My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda_94Feb23
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda Packets
>
199x
>
1994
>
CCAgenda_94Feb23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2010 10:49:20 AM
Creation date
11/12/2010 10:49:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEB 22 '94 09 :58AM ROTHSCHILD B W INC P.4/5 <br /> v. What does the Open Meeting Law Defense Cost Reimbursement <br /> Agreement cover? <br /> Under the new coverage, LMCIT will reimburse a city <br /> official for 801 of the defense cost incurred by the city <br /> official in defending an Open Meeting Law lawsuit. The Open <br /> Meeting Law Defense Costs Reimbursement Agreement is limited to <br /> $20,000. This is the most LMCIT will reimburse any one city <br /> official for defense costs for Open Meeting Law lawsuits <br /> commenced during the term of the insurance coverage agreement, <br /> regardless of the number of lawsuits or the number of actual <br /> alleged violations. <br /> VI. What doesn't it cover? <br /> There are two Major kinds of costs for which this coverage would <br /> not reimburse the official: <br /> 1. Any fine or penalty for violating the open meeting law. <br /> 2. Any award that orders the city official to pay for the <br /> opposing party's attorney's fees. <br /> As an example, suppose a newspaper is successful in bringing an <br /> open meeting claim against a city official. The judge awards a <br /> $100 penalty against the official and also orders the official <br /> to pay the attorneys fees incurred by the newspaper in bringing <br /> the claim. The new coverage would not pay or reimburse either <br /> the penalty or the attorneys fees awarded. <br /> Note too that this coverage would not cover any legal costs that <br /> the city might incur if the city itself were a party to the <br /> Open Meeting Law litigation unless, of course, it was part of <br /> a suit that also included a covered claim for damages, as <br /> discussed earlier. <br /> VII. How will the Open Meeting Law Defense Cost Reimbursement <br /> Agreement work? <br /> The coverage is significantly different than other coverage <br /> provided under the standard LMCIT coverage agreements in a <br /> couple important ways. First, unlike LMCIT's liability <br /> coverages, the Open Meeting Law coverage does not pay the legal <br /> costs on the city official's behalf. Instead, LMCIT will <br /> reimburse the city official for 80% of those costs, to a maximum <br /> of $20,000, after the official has incurred those costs. The <br /> city official remains responsible for paying his/her defense <br /> attorney, including the 20% which LMCIT will not reimburse as <br /> well as any costs over $20,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.