My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda_94Feb23
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda Packets
>
199x
>
1994
>
CCAgenda_94Feb23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2010 10:49:20 AM
Creation date
11/12/2010 10:49:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 7 <br /> OPEN MEETING EXCEPTIONS or charter permits making the proceed <br /> Statutes specify two exceptions to the ings public only with the approval or at <br /> open meeting law. First, the state exempts the request of an employee who has not <br /> meetings of any state agency. board, or waived the exception. This is true of <br /> commission when exercising quasi school teachers under state law. <br /> judicial functions involving disciplinary Third, collective bargaining sessions <br /> proceedings. However. this provision does with union representatives may be exempt <br /> not apply to meetings where local agen- if the director of mediation services so <br /> cies discharge quasi-judicial functions.'S provides, otherwise such sessions are <br /> Second, the city council may, by major- public. <br /> ity vote in a public meeting, decide to hold <br /> a closed meeting to consider strategy for DATA PRACTICES ACT <br /> labor negotiations, including negotiation The Minnesota Government Data Prac- <br /> developments or discussion of labor tices Act serves as a fourth exception to <br /> negotiation proposals. The council must the open meeting law; but much more <br /> announce the time and place of the closed narrowly than it has in the past. <br /> meeting at the public meeting. Now, the general rule is that cities <br /> After the closed meeting, a written cannot close a public meeting to discuss <br /> record of all members of the city council data that is not public. Government <br /> and all other people present must be officials may discuss data that is not <br /> available to the public. The council must public data at a meeting without liability <br /> tape record the proceedings at city ex- if the disclosure relates to a matter within <br /> pense and preserve the tape for two years the scope of the public body's authority, is <br /> after signing the contract. The tape re- reasonably necessary to conduct the <br /> cording must be available to the public business, and is without malice. During <br /> after all labor contracts are signed for the an open meeting. the public body must <br /> current budget period. make reasonable efforts to protect the <br /> If someone claims that the council data from disclosure, including reference <br /> conducted public business other than to letter, number, or other designation <br /> labor negotiations at the closed meeting, that does not reveal the identity of the <br /> and the tape is still available to the pub- data subject. <br /> lic, a court may review the recording of However, the city must close any por- <br /> the meeting. If the court determines that a tion of a meeting if another law expressly <br /> violation of the open meeting law may requires it or if certain types of data are <br /> exist, the recording may be introduced at under discussion. This includes data that <br /> trial in its entirety, subject to any protec- would identify alleged victims or reporters <br /> tive orders either party requests and the of criminal sexual conduct, domestic <br /> court deems appropriate. abuse, or maltreatment of minors or <br /> Three additional exceptions to the open vulnerable adults; active investigative <br /> meeting law may apply to cities because data or internal affairs data relating to <br /> other state laws require confidentiality in allegations of law enforcement personnel <br /> certain cases. misconduct; educational data; health <br /> First are meetings between the govern- data; medical data welfare data; or non <br /> ing body and its attorney to discuss public mental health data. <br /> pending or threatened litigation. This A public body must close a meeting for <br /> exception is based on the confidential preliminary consideration of allegations or <br /> relationship between attorney and client. charges against an individual subject to <br /> The city may not abuse this privilege to its authority. If the members conclude <br /> suppress public observation of the deci- that discipline of any nature may be <br /> sion- making process. It does not extend to warranted, further meetings or hearings <br /> the governing body's request for general must be open. <br /> legal advice or opinion. 91 It would seldom A public body may close a meeting to <br /> be justified in situations other than evaluate the performance of an individual <br /> threatened or pending litigation. subject to its authority. The governmental <br /> The second exception includes meetings unit must, however, identify the indi- <br /> to consider possible disciplinary proceed vidual to be evaluated prior to closing a <br /> ings against an employee when a statute meeting. At its next open meeting, the <br /> 101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.