Laserfiche WebLink
City of Falcon Heights D <br /> Memorandum <br /> DATE: 29 March 1994 <br /> TO: Mayor and Councilmembers <br /> FROM: Susan Hoyt, City Administrator <br /> RE: Information related to RFP for police services <br /> I've attached sections of a book Beyond 9 1 1 (Basic Books,1990) by Malcolm <br /> Sparrow, Mark Moore, and David Kennedy. This book, along with Policing in a Free <br /> Society by Herman Goldstein, was recommended to me by the Minneapolis police <br /> officer who works on community policing. Both of these books are geared toward <br /> police management, typically in larger cities with larger police departments. <br /> Nevertheless, it is still applicable information, especially for an inner -ring suburb where <br /> the problems aren't so overwhelming that the officer assigned to the city must spend <br /> most of the time dealing with incidents and arrests. <br /> Perhaps the most valuable information in this work is its insight into the "visibility" <br /> component of policing that we keep hearing so much about. The authors point out <br /> that most "police 9 1 1 calls" are not serious crimes or crimes in action, and, if they <br /> are, they don't arrive in time to stop them or to arrest anyone. And, many 9 1 1" <br /> calls are made by the same parties. Yet, over the past thirty or more years the police <br /> establishment has made responding to "9 1 1 calls' its primary goal and measure of <br /> success. <br /> The authors believe that it is time to de- emphasize the hierarchical structure and <br /> specialization of police agencies, and to redirect resources and energy from a <br /> "response time" mentality. They suggest that a patrol officer, who is assigned to a <br /> geographic area and given the time and incentives to patrol a neighborhood(s), does <br /> much more than drive around a community to be visible. The officer has the <br /> responsibility of noticing potential problems and remedying them because the officer <br /> sees the community day -in and day -out. These problems may vary from possible <br /> "drug" houses, to teen loitering that, if left unattended, might lead to community <br /> misunderstanding, to "attractive community issues" (code enforcement), to selling <br /> liquor to minors from a local store, to traffic control /public safety issues. (This patrol <br /> would act very much like the mail carrier who contacted us three years ago because <br /> he was concerned about an elderly resident who was not picking up her mail.) <br /> The authors suggest that the patrol officer is not only responsible for community <br /> protection by observation. He or she can *directly communicate with community <br /> residents, business people and city officials outside the "police call" setting. By <br /> interacting in informal and formal neighborhood settings, the police officer escapes the <br /> response oriented relationship that a "call" creates between a police officer and an <br /> individual. Given the opportunity to have more direct contact with citizens and public <br /> officials in daily settings, the patrol officer doesn't need to rely solely upon other <br /> police personnel, who act as the administrative liaison or community contact person, <br /> to communicate to him or her what is important to the community. Although there <br /> are no guarantees, this approach should ultimately reduce the number of police calls. <br /> It may create a police force that is more willing to investigate and resolve a situation <br /> from the beginning rather than waiting until it is a documented concern or emergency. <br />