Laserfiche WebLink
are three blocks that are configured in this manner in the city. <br /> There is an alternative method for constructing an addition to the <br /> property that does not require a substantial variance. <br /> Any additional cost for constructing to the south of the property instead <br /> of to the west of the property is not a reason for granting a variance. <br /> The adjacent property value at 1780 North Snelling Drive might be <br /> negatively affected by the addition of a two story home 14 feet from its <br /> rearyard, which is also quite shallow. (The variance does not require <br /> that a dollar amount to be assigned to a loss of property value, but that <br /> it bebased upon a commissoner's sense of whether or not 1780 North <br /> Snelling would be more desirable, Tess desirable or remain the same as <br /> a result of granting the variance for the neighbor to the east.) <br /> ATTACHMENTS: <br /> A Standards for granting a variance <br /> B Proposed site plan with alternative areas <br /> C Staff report on variance request for February 28, 1994 meeting <br /> D Letter from property owner <br /> E Updated report at March 28, 1994 planning commission meeting <br /> F Minutes of meeting <br /> ACTION REQUESTED: <br /> Deny the variance request for the addition and the garage. The request for the garage <br /> variance was denied because it is an integral part of this project. (The property owner <br /> may submit new plans at any time in the future for review.) <br /> If discussed off the consent agenda: <br /> 1. Begin with a brief staff review and report on the project <br /> 2. If desired, request the property owners and neighbors to speak. <br />