My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda_94Apr13
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda Packets
>
199x
>
1994
>
CCAgenda_94Apr13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2010 11:29:15 AM
Creation date
11/12/2010 11:29:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attach. E <br /> City of Falcon Heights <br /> Planning Commission <br /> 28 March 1994 <br /> ITEM: Consideration for a request for a variance to Chapter 9 4.01 <br /> Subdivision 4 of fifteen feet three inches 15' 3 to the required <br /> thirty foot rear yard setback, and to Chapter 9 2.04 Subdivision 1(c) <br /> of two feet three inches (2'3 to the required five foot side yard <br /> setback for 1775 Asbury Street <br /> SUBMITTED BY: Theodore Wiger, property owner <br /> REVIEWED BY: Phil Carlson, AICP, planning consultant <br /> Susan Hoyt, City Administrator <br /> ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM FEBRUARY 28, 1994 MEETING: <br /> Commission suggestion. The planning commission deferred the decision on the <br /> request for a variance for a sideyard and rearyard setback as requested by Mr. <br /> Wiger until the March 28, 1994 meeting in order to permit the property owner, Mr. <br /> Wiger, to revise his proposed construction plans to require a Tess substantial <br /> variance request than the one presented to the commission (see minutes and <br /> attachment 1). <br /> Communication with Mr. Wiger. On March 1, 1994 Mr. Wiger stopped by city hall <br /> to ask what his next step should be regarding the variance request. Staff <br /> explained that the commission suggested that he revise his plans so he does not <br /> require a substantial rear yard variance. Staff asked that plans be submitted by <br /> March 18 so they could be reviewed prior to the agenda being prepared for the <br /> planning commission meeting. This was followed up with a letter (attachment 2). <br /> After Phil Carlson further researched the city's non conforming use requirements as <br /> they apply to existing setbacks, Phil confirmed that Mr. Wiger would need a <br /> variance even if he maintained the current rear and front yard setback because <br /> they are at 28 feet rather the required 30 feet (attachment 3). (A non- conforming <br /> sideyard setback does not need a variance.) Staff informed Mr. Wiger of this by <br /> letter on March 9, 1994 (attachment 4). <br /> Although Mr. Wiger stopped by city hall for information on city setback <br /> requirements for all types of uses (garages, driveways, fences, additions) in early <br /> March, as of this writing staff has not received plans nor heard from Mr. Wiger <br /> about his plans. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.