Laserfiche WebLink
DAHLGREN <br /> S RDLOW <br /> AND UBAN <br /> ,.:,r <br /> CONSULTING PLANNERS <br /> LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS <br /> 300 FIRST AVENUE NORTH <br /> SUITE 210 <br /> MINNEAPOLIS. MN 5=)301 MAR f 1994 6,13 3393300 f� 94 <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> DATE: March 3, 1994 <br /> TO: Susan Hoyt, City of Falcon Heights <br /> FROM: Phil Carlson; Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban, Inc. <br /> RE: Wiger Variance/Front Setback, 1775 Asbury Street <br /> Related to our discussion about Mr. Wiger's variance application, it should be clear that even an <br /> addition to the south side that extends the existing front and rear edges of the house would need a <br /> variance, although a justifiable one in my opinion. <br /> The existing front setback of the house is 28' -0" and the existing rear setback is 28' -7 both less <br /> than the 30' required by ordinance. I referred in my previous planning report (first page, last <br /> paragraph) to §9 -2.02, Subd. 8(b) and 9(a), which require a non conforming house such as the <br /> Wigers' to meet all standards if it is to be enlarged. As you mentioned, the only exceptions are for <br /> interior side yard and corner side yard setbacks. We were concentrating on the rear setback since <br /> that was the focus of his proposal, but the same standard applies to the front setback. I implied this <br /> in the last line of the planning report, urging the applicant to expand south where a "substantial" <br /> variance would not be needed (as opposed to no variance). <br /> Therefore, even if Mr. Wiger expands as I had suggested in my sketch, he must apply for a variance <br /> to both the front and rear setbacks. I believe it would impose a "particular hardship" on Mr. Wiger <br /> to require him to meet the 30' front and rear setbacks, instead of extending the house flush with the <br /> existing setbacks. Meeting the 30' setbacks would create an awkward jog in the front and rear edges <br /> of the house, creating difficulties for construction. It would also create an aesthetic concern <br /> considering the design of the existing house, and it would impose a harsher standard on Mr. Wiger's <br /> use of the property, compared to the many neighbors in the area who enjoy similar front setbacks of <br /> slightly less than 30 feet, due to the vary shallow lots on these blocks between Asbury and North <br /> Snelling Drive. <br />