Laserfiche WebLink
accommodate a new two story 22' wide garage. <br /> Mr. Carlson showed an aerial photo of the Wiger lot. The lot is below the minimum <br /> size requirement for the R -1 district. He said the width is adequate but the depth is <br /> Tess than typical or desirable and that such a non conforming lot may not be more <br /> intensively developed. The photo showed there are many shallow lots on the block <br /> between Asbury and North Snelling Drive similar to the Wiger lot. He said the <br /> ordinance standards in §9 -2.02 Subd.8(b) allow alterations, additions, or <br /> enlargement of non conforming uses as long as all other standards (including <br /> setbacks) are adhered to. Mr. Carlson stated that since both the house and garage <br /> need setback variances, the proposed project does not meet this standard. <br /> Mr. Carlson explained that there is room to expand to the south of the house <br /> without needing a substantial variance. He felt that because the rear yards on this <br /> block are already shallow and the houses close together, that to allow an <br /> encroachment other than a garage would set a negative precedent. Also, Mr. <br /> Wiger would need to demonstrate that he cannot meet the ordinance standard <br /> without causing a hardship. It has not been shown that expanding the house to <br /> the south where a limited variance would be needed would create a hardship, so <br /> Mr. Carlson felt a rear yard variance is not justified. However, the side yard <br /> variance request for the garage is necessary to avoid a hardship because an <br /> adequate size garage would be considered a necessity. <br /> Mr. Wiger, property owner, brought plans for the commission to review showing <br /> both the original and the expansion plans. He said that expanding to the south is <br /> not an option because the house is a colonial style home and cannot be expanded <br /> without making it look "added on Also, he explained, their side yard is used for <br /> recreation and they do not want to lose any of it. He said that if they expanded to <br /> the south, a good share of the house would have to be gutted, so to keep it within <br /> a reasonable price range and not lose side yard space, expanding to the west made <br /> more sense. Mr. Wiger explained the second story on the garage will be used for <br /> storage of airplane parts that are currently in a rental hanger. <br /> Neighboring property owner, Glen Olson of 1780 Snelling Drive, said that he would <br /> like to have the variance denied because the Olsons have a small back yard that is <br /> landscaped so he and his wife can enjoy some seclusion, especially from Snelling <br /> Avenue. He said if the variance were to be granted they would lose this seclusion. <br /> Mrs. Helms of 1789 Asbury was also present and expressed concern about the <br /> size and appearance of the proposed addition. <br /> Commissioner Salzberg asked Mr. Wiger if he would be agreeable to having the <br /> variance discussion continued to the March meeting thus giving him some time to <br /> investigate the feasibility of expanding to the south. Mr. Wiger said yes, if was <br /> necessary. <br />