My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda_94May25
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda Packets
>
199x
>
1994
>
CCAgenda_94May25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2010 12:10:35 PM
Creation date
11/12/2010 12:10:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br /> REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MARCH 28, 1994 <br /> 7 P.M. <br /> PRESENT ABSENT ALSO PRESENT <br /> Tom Brace Kay Andrews Susan Hoyt, Administrator <br /> Lee Barry Wendy Treadwell Sam Jacobs, City Council Liaison <br /> Paul Kuettel Phil Carlson, Planning Consultant <br /> Ken Salzberg <br /> Lisa Lampi (arrived at 7:30) <br /> Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Chairperson Barry. <br /> Minutes of the February 28, 1994 we approved as written. <br /> REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CHAPTER 9 -4.01 SUBDIVISION (4) OF <br /> FIFTEEN FEET THREE INCHES (15' -3 TO THE REQUIRED THIRTY FOOT REAR <br /> YEAR SETBACK, AND TO CHAPTER 9 -2.04 SUBDIVISION 1(c) OF TWO FEET <br /> THREE INCHES (2'3 TO THE REQUIRED FIVE FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK <br /> FOR 1775 ASBURY STREET. <br /> Hoyt briefly reviewed the February 28 planning commission recommendation <br /> regarding the request for a variance at 1775 Asbury by property owners, Mr. <br /> and Mrs. Wiger. She said that the commission requested that the Wigers revise <br /> their proposed construction plans by expanding their house into the sideyard <br /> rather than further into the rearyard. This would require a less substantial <br /> variance request than the one submitted. <br /> Mrs. Wiger explained that no new plans were submitted because it would not <br /> be financially feasible to expand into the sideyard and she understood that any <br /> revisions should go in this direction. And they would like to have their original <br /> variance request reexamined and approved. <br /> The Olsons, of 1780 Snelling Drive, to the rear of 1775 Asbury, said they <br /> objected because of the proximity to their rear yard and the possible invasion of <br /> their privacy. <br /> A discussion followed regarding the impact that the addition of a two story <br /> home 14 feet from the rearyard would have on the adjacent property at 1780 <br /> N. Snelling Drive. The commission also discussed the fact that the Wiger <br /> property is not unusually small in area, that there are other blocks configured in <br /> the same manner in Falcon Heights, and that there is space to expand into the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.