Laserfiche WebLink
th future options for street sweepings is known, these figures would occur cm an annual basis. It is the intent of the <br /> a ea communities to continue this joint project indefinitely. <br /> P+: _ibilitfes for replication <br /> processing site will be available: to interested panics for first -}rand observation. Written materials regarding pricing of <br /> cled materials and other operational details will be prepared for the project, and will be made available to interested <br /> p. ins, ha addition, MN /DOT and the Local Road Research Board have interests in understanding this process in order to <br /> d': a+1 I the findings to other jurisdictions in Minnesota. <br /> ptementation .Process <br /> irk tasks: Timeline <br /> 1. Notification of grant award Jemmy 1, 1995 <br /> 2. Partners meetings to contimie to develop Janu.'uy through May, 1995 <br /> process, acrd select best equipment. <br /> i Purchase equipment March 1995 <br /> 4 Design and develop site March/April 1995 <br /> 5 Develop preliminary process agreements April 1995 <br /> 6 Develop preliminary costing structure April 1995 <br /> Begin processing material May 1995 <br /> 8 Evaluate and refine process May thnnigh Sept. 1995 <br /> 9 Record inputs and outputs continuously <br /> 4 Review prauudtion st end of season October/November 1995 <br /> 17.j. Revise if necessary for next year December 1995 <br /> L Develop status report December 1995 to February 1996 <br /> !L t/dutica or 2e-remind <br /> Cities: All parmer cities would be involved in tasks 1 -6, 8 -12, .above. City personnel would include street <br /> maintenance supervisors, public works directors for the punning stages. Supervisors and load workers in site <br /> development, and heavy and light equipment operators for the actual reprocessing operation. <br /> County: ,Reansey Cciunty would be involved in all tasks 1 through 12, above. County personnel would include <br /> street maintenance 3upexvisots, public works directors for the planning stages. Supervisors and lead workers in <br /> site development, and heavy and light equipment operators for the actual reproc essiog opct*tioni. <br /> MN/DOT, LRRl3, Metropolitan Council: These three partners would participate in tasks 1-6 and 8 -12 as needed <br /> and requested by the partner cities and county. Staff from these groups would be available to assist in working <br /> out eolations to any of the process or accounting needs identified in the above tasks. As necessary, other <br /> consultants could be brought in to assist in areas of special need. <br /> G naps of Clients affected: <br /> is service is primarily a benefit to the partner communities, and for practical purposes, they would be considered the <br /> cli t. However, taxpayers from partner communities and current and future landfill users will benefit from lower tipping <br /> fe due to abated waste going to the landfills. <br /> icipnted diifictidtiesii'.ropost:d solutions <br /> eras potential difficulties have been identified. However they do not appear to be barriers that would prohibit the <br /> pr jest from being successful. One is the convenient location of a site and the preparation of it for this recycling <br /> op ion. The short -term (not longer than five years) solution is to use a piece of property used by Ramsey County and <br /> o by Ramsey County in the south -east part of Roseville. However, this site is designated in 1.eeeville's band use plan <br /> Grant Proposal <br /> Page 5 <br />