HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCAgen_12 Dec 12CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS Regular Meeting of the City Council City Hall 2077 West Larpenteur Avenue AGENDA December 12 , 2012 A. CALL TO ORDER: B. ROLL CALL: LI NDSTROM ____ HARRIS ____ GOSLINE ____ LONG ____ MERCER -TAYLOR ____ FISCHER ____ C. PRESENTATIONS : D . A P PROVAL OF MINUTES: November 28 , 2012 E. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Refinancing of 2005 Ecumen -Pines of Hutchinson Conduit Financing Bonds 2. Budget Hearing F. CONSENT AGENDA: 1. Gen eral Disbursements through 12/5 /2012: $114,976.20 Payroll through 11/28 /2012: $14,364.58 2. Approval of City License 3. 2013 Commission Appointments 4. Recognition of 2012 Adopt -a -Crop Participants 5. 2013 -2014 Forester Contract 6. Mileage re imbursement rate for 2013 7. 2013 Fee Schedule 8. Budget amendment to the Parks Program Special Revenue Fund (201) 9. Resolution Supporting Metro Transit’s Funding Request from MnDOT for the Snelling Avenue Arterial Bus Rapid Transit Implementation 10. Receive Feasibility Report and Order Public Hearing for the 2013 Pavement Management Program 11. Budget Amendment of Transfer to General Fund from Sanitary Sewer Fund G: POLICY ITEMS : H. INFORMATION/ANNOUNCEMENTS: I. COMMUNITY FORUM: J. ADJOURNM ENT:
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS Regular Meeting of the City Council City Hall 2077 West Larpenteur Avenue AGENDA November 28 , 2012 A. CALL TO ORDER: 7:05 pm B. ROLL CALL: LI NDSTROM __X__ HARRIS __X__ GOSLINE __X __ LONG __ab __ MERCER -TAYLOR __ab __ FISCHER __X__ C. PRESENTATIONS : D . A P PROVAL OF MINUTES: November 14 , 2012 Approved E. PUBLIC HEARINGS: F. CONSENT AGENDA: Keith Gosline Moved Approval 3 -0 1. General Disbursements through 10/30/2012: $89,771.38 Payroll through 10/31/2012: $14,909.60 2. Approval of City License 3. Declaration of Amendment and Restatement of the City of Falcon Heights Flexible Benefits Plan 4. Designation of 2013 Prosecuting Attorney 5. 2013 Housing Resource Center Consultant Services Agreement G: POLICY ITEMS : H. INFORMATION/ANNOUNCEMENTS: Council member Pam Harris Brief update on Planning Commission meeting . Council member Keith Gosli ne Brief Park board update - commission discussed the thistle problems at Curtiss . Brief update o n NYFS meeting. Mayor Peter Lindstrom S o lar Panel Ribbon Cutting is at 9am on Saturday, December 1 st Solar Pane Workshop/Bulk Purchasing Program is at 10am Saturday, December 1 st
I. COMMUNITY FORUM: J. ADJOURNMENT: 7:2 5 pm
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Families, Fields and Fair __________________________ The City That Soars! Item Refinancing of 2005 Ecumen -Pines of Hutchinson Conduit Financing Bonds Description The City has the authority to con duit issue bank -qualified, tax -exempt (501(c)3) bonds each year. In a conduit financing scenario, t he City lends its authority to a qualified non -profit, tax -exempt entity, and can take an administrative fee in retur n for lending this auth ority. In 2005, the City of Hutchinson, MN, asked Falcon Heights to utilize its conduit bonding authority in order to help with the issuance of housing bonds for Maplewood Senior Housing, Inc./Ecumen , a Minnesota non -profit corporation and tax -exempt 501 (c)3 org anization. These bonds were utilized to construct a 50 -unit independent senior housing facility , The Pines of Hutchinson, LLC . The City of Hutchinson agreed to lend host approval to this transaction, due to their inability to act as a conduit for these bonds because they were near their bank -qualified limit for 2005. Maplewood Senior Housing /Ecumen agreed to a fee of $25,000, or slightly less than .5% of the total issue of $5,500,000. Re cently, Pines of Hutchinson, LLC, contacted the attorney at Briggs & Morgan , who had originally crafted the conduit financing deal in 2005 for the City of Falcon Heights , about the possibility of refinancing these bonds to a lower rate. There is no financial risk or repayment liability to the City for allowing th is , and this conduit bonding does not affect the City’s bond rating. It will however, allow us to collect about a .5% fee for the refinancing. They anticipate refinancing a little less than $5 million in bonds which would put the fee collected by us at a bout approximately $23,000. The action requested is for the City Council to hold a Public Hearing and adopt Resolution 12 -15 approving the conduit bond refinancing and authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to sign/execute all documents related to th e refinancing. Budget Impact T he authori zation of this refinancing will bring in one -time revenue of approximately $23,000 for the City. Meeting Date December 12 , 201 2 Agenda Item Public Hearing Attachment Resolution No. 12 -15 Submitted By Bart Fischer, City Administrator
Att achment(s) Resolution No. 12 -15 Action(s) Requested Staff recommends that the Falcon Heights City Council hold a P ublic Hearing and adopt Resolution 12 -15 approving the conduit bond refinancing and authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to sign/execute all documents related to the refinancing.
5043898v1 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS COUNCIL RESOLUTION December 12, 2012 No. 12 -15 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF A SENIOR HOUSING REVENUE REFUNDING NOTE (PINES OF HUTCHINSON, LLC PROJECT), SERIES 2012 AND AUTHORIZATION OF THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act"), authorizes municipalities to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of financing or refinancing projects including any land, building or other improvement and real or personal property, whethe r or not in existence, to the end that more adequate residential housing facilities for seniors and low - and middle -income families and persons may be provided, to enter into financing agreements with others for the purpose of providing revenues to pay suc h bonds, and further to secure the payment of such bonds; WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota (the "City") has received from Pines of Hutchinson, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Borrower"), a proposal that th e City assist in refinancing a Project hereinafter described through the issuance of a revenue note, as further defined below, the "Note", pursuant to the Act; WHEREAS, The Project to be refinanced by the Note is the refunding of the outstanding principal balance of the City’s $5,285 ,000 Senior Housing Revenue Bonds (Pines of Hutchinson, LLC Project) Series 2005A (the “Prior Bonds”), which were issued to finance the acquisition and construction of a 50 -unit senior housing facility located at 945 Century Ave nue in Hutchinson, Minnesota (the “Project”). The Project is owned by the Borrower; a. Based on representations of the Borrower, no public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official eit her directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project; and b. A public hearing on the Project was held on this date, after notice was published and materials made available for public inspection at the City's offices, all as required by the Act and Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), at which public hearing all those appearing who desired to speak were heard and written comments were accepted. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota, as follows: SECTION 1. FINDINGS . The City hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: a) The City is a municipal corporation and a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota and is authorized under the Act to assist the senior housing project
5043898v1 2 her ein referred to, and to issue and sell the Note for the purpose, in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Act and in this Resolution. b) The issuance and sale of the Senior Housing Revenue Refunding Note (Pines of Hutchinson, LLC Proje ct), Series 2012, (the "Note") by the City, pursuant to the Act, is in the best interest of the City, and the City hereby determines to issue the Note and to sell the Note to Bell State Bank & Trust, in Alexandria, Minnesota (the "Lender"), as provided her ein. The City will loan the proceeds of the Note (the "Loan") to the Borrower in order to refinance the Project and refund the Prior Bonds. A form of the Note has been submitted to the City Council. c) Pursuant to an Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (the "Loan Agreement") to be entered into between the City and the Borrower, the Borrower has agreed to repay the Note in specified amounts and at specified times sufficient to pay in full when due the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Note. In addition, the Loan Agreement contains provisions relating to the maintenance and operation of the Project, indemnification, insurance, and other agreements and covenants which are required or permitted by the Act and which the City and the Borrower deem necessary or desirable for the refinancing of the Project. A form of the Loan Agreement has been submitted to the City Council. d) Pursuant to a Pledge Agreement (the "Pledge Agreement") to be entered into between the City and the Lender, the City has pledg ed and granted a security interest in all of its rights, title, and interest in the Loan Agreement to the Lender (except for certain rights of indemnification and to reimbursement for certain costs and expenses). A form of the Pledge Agreement has been su bmitted to the City Council. e) Pursuant to an Amended and Restated Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents (the "Mortgage") to be executed by the Borrower in favor of the Lender, the Borrower h as secured payment of amounts due under the Loan Agreement and Note by granting to the Lender a mortgage and security interest in the property described therein. A form of the Mortgage has been submitted to the City Council but will not be executed by the City. f) The Note will be a special, limited obligation of the City. The Note shall not be payable from or charged upon any funds other than the revenues pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. No holder of t he Note shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the Note or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City. The Note shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. g) It is desirable, feasible and consistent with the objects and purposes of the Act to issue the Note, for the purpose of refin ancing the costs of the Project and refunding the Prior Bonds.
5043898v1 3 SECTION 2. THE NOTE . 2.1 A uthorized Amount and Form of Note . The Note is hereby approved and shall be issued pursuant to this Resolution in substantially the form submitted to the City Council with such appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as are necessary and appropri ate and are permitted or required by this Resolution, and in accordance with the further provisions hereof; and the total aggregate principal amount of the Note that may be outstanding hereunder shall not exceed $5,000,000, unless a duplicate Note is issue d pursuant to Section 2.7. The Note shall bear interest at a variable rate as se t forth therein, not to exceed 4 %. 2.2 The Note . The Note shall be dated as of the date of delivery to the Lender, shall be payable at the times and in the manner, shall bear int erest at the rate, and shall be subject to such other terms and conditions as are set forth therein. 2.3 Execution . The Note shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of its Mayor and the City Administrator and shall be sealed with the seal of the City; provided that the seal may be intentionally omitted as provided by law. In case any officer whose signature shall appear on the Note shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Note, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if had remained in office until delivery. In the event of the absence or disability of the Mayor or the City Administrator, such officers of the City as, in the opinion of the attorney for the City, may act in thei r behalf, shall without further act or authorization of the City Council execute and deliver the Note. 2.4 Delivery of Initial Note . Before delivery of the Note there shall be filed with the Lender (except to the extent waived by the Lender) the following ite ms: (1) an executed copy of each of the following documents: (a) the Loan Agreement; (b) the Pledge Agreement; (c) the Mortgage; (2) A n opinion of Counsel for the Borrower as prescribed by the Lender and Bond Counsel; (3) T he opinion of Bond Counsel as to the validity and tax exe mpt status of the Note; (4) A 501(c)(3) determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service evidencing that the Borrower ’s sole member is exempt from income taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code; (5) S uch other documents and opinions as Bond Counsel may reasonably require for purposes of rendering its opinion required in subsection (3) above or that the Lender may reasonably require for the closing.
5043898v1 4 2.5 Disposition of Proceeds of the Note . Upon delivery of the Note to Lender, the Lender shall, on behalf of t he City, disburse the proceeds of the Note for redemption and refunding of the Prior Bonds in accordance with the terms of the Loan Agreement. 2.6 Registration of Transfer . The City will cause to be kept at the office of the City Administrator a Note Register in which, subject to such reasonable regulations as it may prescribe, the City shall provide for the registration of transfers of ownership of the Note. The Note shall be initially registered in the name of the Lender and shall be transferable upon the N ote Register by the Lender in person or by its agent duly authorized in writing, upon surrender of the Note together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the City Administrator, duly executed by the Lender or its duly authorized agent. Th e following form of assignment shall be sufficient for said purpose. For value received ___________ hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto ________________ the within Note of the City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota, and does hereby irrevocably constitute a nd appoint ___________________ attorney to transfer said Note on the books of such City with full power of substitution in the premises. The undersigned certifies that the transfer is made in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.9 of the Resolution authorizing the issuance of the Note. Dated: Registered Owner Upon such transfer the City Administrator shall note the date of registration and the name and address of the new Lender in the applicable Note Register and in the registration blank appearing on the Note. 2.7 Mutilated, Lost or Destroyed Note . In case the Note issued hereunder shall become mutilated or be destroyed or lost, the City shall, if not then prohibited by law, cause to be executed and delivered, a new Note of like outsta nding principal amount, number and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of such mutilated Note, or in lieu of and in substitution for such Note destroyed or lost, upon the Lender's paying the reasonable expenses and charges of the C ity in connection therewith, and in the case of a Note destroyed or lost, the filing with the City of evidence satisfactory to the City with indemnity satisfactory to it. If the mutilated, destroyed or lost Note has already matured or been called for rede mption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Note prior to payment. 2.8 Ownership of Note . The City may deem and treat the person in whose name the Note is last registered in the Note Register and by notation on the Note whethe r or not such Note shall be overdue, as the absolute owner of such Note for the purpose of receiving payment of or on account of the Principal Balance, redemption price or interest and for all other purposes whatsoever, and the City shall not be affected b y any notice to the contrary. 2.9 Limitation on Note Transfers . The Note will be issued to an "accredited investor" and without registration under state or other securities laws, pursuant to an exemption for such issuance; and accordingly the Note may not be assigned or transferred in whole or part, nor
5043898v1 5 may a participation interest in the Note be given pursuant to any participation agreement, except to another "accredited investor" or "financial institution" in accordance with an applicable exemption from suc h registration requirements and with full and accurate disclosure of all material facts to the prospective purchaser(s) or transferee(s). 2.10 Issuance of a New Note . Subject to the provisions of Section 2.9, the City shall, at the request and expense of the L ender, issue a new note, in aggregate outstanding principal amount equal to that of the Note surrendered, and of like tenor except as to number, principal amount, and the amount of the periodic installments payable thereunder, and registered in the name of the Lender or such transferee as may be designated by the Lender. SECTION 3. MISCELLANEOUS . 3.1 Severability . If any provision of this Resolution shall be held or deemed to be or shall, in fact, be inoperative or unenforceable as applied in any particular case in any jurisdiction or jurisdictions or in all jurisdictions or in all cases because it conflicts with any provisions of any constitution or statute or rule or public policy, or for any other reason, such circumstances shall not have the effect of rendering the provision in question inoperative or unenforceable in any other case or circumstance, or of rendering any other provision or provisions herein contained invalid, inoperative, or unenforceable to any extent whatever. The invalidity of any one or more phras es, sentences, clauses or paragraphs in this Resolution contained shall not affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof. 3.2 Authentication of Transcript . The officers of the City are directed to furnish to Bond Counsel certified copi es of this Resolution and all documents referred to herein, and affidavits or certificates as to all other matters which are reasonably necessary to evidence the validity of the Note. All such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any h eretofore furnished, shall constitute recitals of the City as to the correctness of all statements contained therein. 3.3 Authorization to Execute Agreements . The forms of the proposed Loan Agreement and the Pledge Agreement are hereby approved in substantial ly the form presented to the City Council, together with such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by Bond Counsel prior to the execution of the documents. The Mayor and the City Administrator of the City are authorized to execute the Loan Agreement and the Pledge Agreement and such other documents as Bond Counsel considers appropriate in connection with the i ssuance of the Note, in the name of and on behalf of the City. In the event of the absence or disability of the Mayor or the City Administrator such officers of the City as, in the opinion of the attorney for the City, may act on their behalf, shall witho ut further act or authorization of the City Council do all things and execute all instruments and documents required to be done or executed by such absent or disabled officers. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. 3.4 Qualified Tax Exempt Obligation . The Prior Bonds were designated by the City as a "qualified tax -exempt obligation" within the meani ng of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code and
5043898v1 6 the City intends that the Note be deemed a “qualified tax -exempt obligation” within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; Adopted by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota, this 12th day o f December, 2012. Moved by: Approved by: ________________________ Peter Lindstrom, Mayor December 12, 2012 LINDSTROM ____ In Favor GOSLINE Attested by:_________________________ HARRIS ____ Against Bart Fischer, Administrator LONG December 12, 2012 MERCER -TAYLOR
5043898v1 7 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Administrator of the City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of the City of Falcon Heig hts, Minnesota duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to a resolution authorizing the issuance of a revenue note. WITNESS my hand this ____ day of December, 2012. _________________________________________ City Administrator
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Families, Fields and Fair __________________________ The City That Soars! Item 2013 Budget Hearing and Adoption Description Each year the C ity C ouncil is required to adopt a budget and tax levy to fund C ity operations. This action must be completed before the end of the year, and the adopted levy is then provided to Ramsey County so they can produce property tax statements for each parce l in the C ounty. On September 1 2 th , the City C ouncil adopted a preliminary levy and established December 1 2 th as the date at which the public would be given an opportunity to address the C ouncil about the proposed budget and tax levy. Before the C ouncil is a proposed property tax levy of $1,084,007 and a General Fund Budget of $1,724,310 . T he levy and budget with a comparison to 2012 is det ailed below: 201 2 Levy Proposed 201 3 Levy % Increase (Decrease) Ad Valorem $9 45,644 $1,008,302 6.60% Debt Service $72,300 $75,705 4.70% Total $1,017,944 $1,084,007 6.49% 2012 General Fund Budget Proposed 201 3 General Fund Budget % Increase $1,6 90,552 $1,724,310 1.98 % The impact of this proposed levy on a m edian valued home, which in 2013 is assessed at $218,900 , is estimated to result in a decrease of $5, or (-0.9%), in the C ity portion of the homeowner’s taxes. A full presentation with mo re deta ils will be presented at the City C ouncil meetin g and will be available on the C ity’s website. In addition, attached to this report is the budget cover letter which goes into more detail about specific budget line items, Meeting Date December 12 , 201 2 Agenda Item Public Hearing Attachment Budget Introduction Letter Resolutions 12 -19 and 1 2 -20 Due to the size and cost of printing the 2013 Budget, the document is available on the City’s website: www.falconheights.org Subm itted By Bart Fischer , City Administrator
factors influencing the pro posed budget, and historical information. Budget Impact This budget prese rves the core functions of the C ity’s current operations, but do es rely on a transfer from the Sanitary Sewer fund . Att achment(s) Budget Introduction Letter Resolution s 12 -19 and 1 2 -20 Due to the size and cost of printing the 2013 Budget, the document is available on the City’s website: www.falconheights.org Action(s) Requested Staff recommends that the Falcon Heights City Council hold a public hearing and receive comment. Once t he hearing is clo sed, staff recommends that the City Council adopt R esolution 12 -19 regarding the 2013 tax levy and adopt R eso lution 12 -20 regarding the 2013 City of Falcon Heights budgets.
1 -1 December 12, 2012 Honorable Mayor Lindstrom And Members of the City Council City of Falcon Heights I am pleased to present for your consideration the 2013 City of Falcon Heights operating budget. This document is important not only as a budgetary t ool, but also communicates to our residents, business community, and property owners the goals and priorities of the city for the upcoming year. The City of Falcon Heights is primarily a residential community situated near the center of the Minneapolis an d St. Paul metropolitan area. The city is at or near full development, with the economy consisting of light industry, commerce, and agricultural related businesses. Economic conditions and employment remain stable with the University of Minnesota St. Pau l campus, Spire Federal Credit Union, and the Minnesota State Fairgrounds providing a diversified economic employment base. FORM OF GOVERNMENT The City of Falcon Heights operates under the Stat utory Plan A form of government, where the policy decisio ns are made by the city council, but the administrative duties are delegated to the city administrator. One of the primary administrative duties of the city administrator is to prepare an annual budget for approval by the council. BUDGET PROCESS In Ju ne, city staff start the preparation of their budget requests for the next calendar year (Falcon Heights' fiscal year is the calendar year). This is accomplished by correlating the city’s budget goals into financial projections, while at the same time, re venues are estimated for the next year. During July, the staff submits their budget requests for the general, special revenue, debt service, and enterprise funds to the city administrator and city finance director. Budget requests are reviewed to determi ne if they are accurate, reasonable, and well justified. Staff requests are modified according to projected revenues. Once completed, a preliminary budget is prepared based upon initial revenue estimates, departmental budget requests, historica l trends, and financial policies. In July, the city administrator and finance director meet with staff members individually. During these meetings, any recommended revisions are discussed and the city administrator makes the final decision as to what will be inclu ded in the proposed budget. The finance director uses this information to prepare the proposed budget document. In August, budget workshops open to the public are held where the city administrator presents the proposed budget to the city council. The ci ty council reviews the proposed budget with staff, who then adjusts the budget for any changes the council recommends. In early September, the city certifies a proposed levy and budget to Ramsey County. The proposed levy is published and parcel specific notices are mailed to property owners . The council holds a public hearing on the prop osed budget in early December and afterward approves the final budget. The city's property tax levy, which is necessary to finance the approved budget, is then certified to Ramsey County. Ramsey county collects the property taxes on behalf of the city as well as other taxing jurisdictions. During the fiscal year, line items may be overspent as long as the total activity budget is not overspent. City staff may recommend changes in the activity budget to the city council, who can then approve or
1 -2 disapprove the amendment. The council may approve an activity to be overspent if funding is available, but may not amend the property tax levy. BUDGET ORGANIZATION The city's a nnual budget consists of five basic sections: 1. Introductory section 2. Governmental funds 3. Enterprise funds 4. Five -year capital improvement plan 5. Appendixes The introductory section in cludes the city's goals for 2013 , fiscal policies and bu dget summary information. The governmental funds section includes revenue and expenditure h istory and projections from 2010 to 2013 for the general, special revenue, debt service, and capital projects funds. A fund is defined as an independent fiscal and accounting entity with a self -balancing set of accounts and resources which are dedicated for a specific purpose. The city uses the modified accrual basis of accounting for all governmental funds, in which revenues are recognized when they become measura ble and available and expenditures are generally recognized when the related fund liabilities are incurred. Enterprise funds are those operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, where the costs of providing services (expenses) are to be recovered primarily on a user -charge basis to the general public (revenues). The city uses the accrual basis of accounting for its enterprise fund (sanitary sewer, storm sewer), in which revenues are recognized when they are earned and expenses are recog nized when they are incurred. The city's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (C.I.P.) is a tabulation of projects and equipment that are being recommended with potential funding sources for each. A capital asset is defined as an expenditure which results in the acquisition or replacement of a fixed asset which costs $1000 or more and/or has a life expectancy of three years or more. The c ity uses the threshold level of $5000 to determine if the capital asset is listed in the general fixed asset account gr oup. The Five -Year Capital Improvment Plan is approved by the city council, but it is a planning document only and approval carries no appropriation authority. All appropriations are made as a result of the annual budgeting process. A glossary of terms is provided to assist in a better understanding of t his budget. Appendixes include additional information to support underlying budget assumptions. 2013 BUDGET SUMMARY The 2011 State of Minnesota legislative session, or rather the special session that ended the state government shutdown, enacted sweeping changes to how property taxes are calculated at the local government level. The budget compromise negotiated between the governor and legislature eliminated the Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) prog ram. In theory, this program served as a credit to local units of government and helped reduce the property tax impact on homesteaded properties. Over the past several years, however, this program was rarely fully f unded and left cities such as Falcon Heig hts in the position of having to make up this loss of revenue. During the 2011 legislative special session, the MVHC program was eliminated and replaced with a Market Value Exclusion, where a portion of residential homestead properties value was eliminated for tax purposes. In effect, this action reduced the taxable market value of property in Falcon Heights by 4% FOR 2011.
1 -3 For 2012, the Market Value Exclusion continue d . The median Estimated Value dropped from 244,800 to 218,900 resulting in a decrease of 10.6% value . However, the city’s fiscal disparities distribution in creased by $4,490 , or 2 .5 %. Due to these two factors, and the fact that the residential households decreased in value more than the commercial and industrial properties, the median valu ed home in Falcon Heights would see an approximate $5 dollar decrease in the city’s portion of the property tax. Personnel As in most government and service related organizations, the vast majority of our spending is the result of employing workers and th eir associated benefits. Health Insurance 2013 will be the fourth year where the city participates in the Public Employees Insurance Program. PEIP is a plan offered through the State of Minnesota to cities and other organizations throught the state. The 2 013 renewal rate is 6%. Employees will continue to purchase other insurance coverages (dental, life, etc.) through Ramsey County. Personnel Costs We have included a 2% cost of living adjustment for regular employees in 2013. There was a 1% COLA in 2012. There are no new full -time employees included in the 2013 Budget. Individual Budget Summaries As was the case for the past few years, the economic outlook is still uncertain , but it is likely that economic improvements will be seen in the near future. Th e areas below highlight department budgets where there are noteable changes from the 2012 budget: Planning and Inspections (117): The expenses have been modestly adjusted upwards to better reflect the relationship with expected building permit revenues as the economy improves. Police (122): Reflects 2 nd year of two -year contract negotiated during 2011. Also reflects a slight de crease in dispatching expenses associated with consolidated dispatch center. The increase in the police budget for 201 3 totals a modest $4,331 ($5,904 for the police contract, a decrease of $1,573 for dispactching costs ). Fire (124) The fire study ($10,000) was concluded in 2012. There is no additional study needs budgeted for 2013. Expenditure Summary The proposed budget refle cts a modest increase in expenditures of $33,4 58, or 1.9 8 % Revenues: Local Government Aid (LGA) The city’s LGA allocation is projected to remain flat as compared to 2012 in the amount of $310,126.
1 -4 Licenses, Permits, and Charges for Service Estimated re venues from building permits and licenses are projected to increase compared to what was anticipated in the 2012 budget. We also are budgeting about the same in other revenues such as facility rentals, zoning fees, and accident clean -up fees, but slightly less in fines and forfeitures, which reflects recent trends. Transfer from Reserve Funds In order to provide a balan c ed budget, a transfer from reserve funds is needed in the amount of $80,000 . This is a decrease as compared to 2012, but during budget w orkshops the city council determined that due to the changes in the MVHC program, this was the best way to mitigate large property tax increases. The actual amount transferred in the past few years has been smaller than budgeted due to higher than expected revenues a n d lower than expected expenses. It is possible this could occur again in 2013, but this amount is needed in order for the budget to balance. Transferring money from capital and enterprise accounts to the general fund began in response to the 20 03 LGA cuts the city was impacted by. Eliminating this transfer should be a goal of future budgets in order to protect the capital account balances and our bond ratings. Since 2006, the actual amount transferred from capital or other accounts at the end of the year has been less than what was originally budgeted. History of Transfer From Reserves to General Fund Year Budgeted Amount Actual Amount 2004 $135,676 $135,676 2005 $204,315 $204,315 2006 $229,832 $160,000 2007 $161,337 $4,000 2008 $113,797 $65,000 2009 $21,732 $0 2010 $112,400 $77,400 2011 $71,917 $23,800 2012 $126,075 $126,075 (Estimate) Debt Levy The city council issued new equipment certificates in 2010 to fund the acquisition of new public works equipment. The total bond issue was $300,000 for a term of five years. Favorable interest rates were received (under 3%) and the first payment on these bonds was due in 2011. $75,705 is being included in the 2013 debt levy, which will be spread across all taxpayers in the city. Summary The overall general fund budget, including expenses, revenues, and transfers, totals $1,724,310. This is an increase of $33,4 58, or 1.98% over the 2012 operating budget. The total tax levy is $1,084,007, which is 6.49% higher than the levy approved for the 201 2 budget. This results in a city tax rate of 26.5 68 %, and a resulted $5 (-0.9 %) property tax decrease on a median valued home (which in 2013 will be $218,900). This property value shows a significant decrease due to the changes in how taxable values are ca lculated due to the changes in the MVHC program. I believe it is a responsible budget that allows the City of Falcon Heights to continue to provide a high level of service at a very reasonable cost. When measured against other Ramsey County municipalities , Falcon Heights’ tax rate is very impressive: City Proposed 2013 City Tax Rate Falcon Heights 26.568 % Arden Hills 27.841 %
1 -5 Lauderdale 31.631 % Little Canada 30.855 % Maplewood 49.013 % Mounds View 50.362% New Brighton 42.058% North St. Paul 36.749% R oseville 38.961% St. Paul 47.403% Shoreview 36.953% Vadnais Heights 29.273% White Bear Lake 21.467% The frugal tax rates are due to an aggressive budget philosophy that encourages sharing or contracting for services from neighboring government agenci es. Some examples of these practices include: • Obtaining police services from the City of St. Anthony • Using the City of Roseville for city engineering services • Providing fire department services to the City of Lauderdale (allowing us to offset our expenses) • Sharing a building inspector and street sweeper with the City of Little Canada • Participating with seventeen area communities on technology related issues, such as phone and information technology services In closing, I wish to acknowledge the contributio ns of many staff members, especially Finance Director Roland Olson and Finance Intern Jake Stanczyk for their tireless efforts in putting these documents together. Sincerely, Bart Fischer City Administrator
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS Council Resolution 12 -19 D ecember 12 , 2012 ______________________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2013 TAX LEVY BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights authorizes the City to levy taxes in the amount of $1,084,007 for the year 2013 ; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Auditor should extend the tax levy in the amount of $1,084,007 for the year 2013 . Moved by: Approved by: ________________________ Peter Lindstrom , Mayor December 12 , 2012 LINDSTROM _____ In Favor Attested by: _________________________ HARRIS Justin Miller LONG City Administrator MERCER -TAYLOR December 12 , 2012 GOSLINE _____ Against Subscribed and sworn before me this ____ day of ______________, 2012 . ________________________________ Notary Public My commission expires:____________
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS RESOLUTION 12 -20 DECEMBER 12, 2012 ______________________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2013 BUDGET BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights that the Genera l Fund Op erating Budget for the year 2013 in th e amount of $1,724,310 and other Fund Budgets as listed are adopted. Park Program Fund (201) $52,400 Community Garden (203) $ 1,000 Water Fund (204) $11,030 Emerald Ash Borer $125,150 Recycli ng Fund (206) $84,700 Community Development Fund (208) $6,6 50 Street Light Utility (209) $40,275 CERT (211) $3,035 CERT (214) $4,935 G O Equipment Cert. Series 2010A $70,200 General Capital Impr ovements (401) $4,150 Pub lic Safety Capital (402) $27,150 Parks Recreation/Public Facilities Capital (403) $6,150 TIF District #1 -2 (412) $245,690 TIF District #1 -3 (414) $191,650 Infrastructure Capital (419) $1,122,790 Capital Equipment 2010 A (424) $76,650 ___________________________________________________________________________________ Moved by: Approved by: ________________________ Peter Lindstrom, Mayor December 12, 2012 LINDSTROM ____ In Favor Attested by: _________________________ HARRIS Justin Miller LONG City Administrator MERCER -TAYLOR December 12, 2012 GOSLINE ____ Against Subscribed and sworn before me this ____ day of ______________, 2012 ________________________________ Notary Public My commission expires:____________
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Families, Fields and Fair __________________________ The City That Soars! Item General Disbursements and Payroll Description Gen eral Disbursements th rough 12 /5 /2012: $114,976.20 Payroll through 11/28 /2012: $14,364.58 Budget Impact Att achment(s) General Disbursements and Payroll Action(s) Requested Staff recommends that the Falcon Heights City Council approve general disbursements and payroll. Meeting Date December 12 , 201 2 Agenda Item Consent F1 Attachment General Disbursements and Payroll Submitted By Roland Olson, Finance Director
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Families, Fields and Fair __________________________ The City That Soars! Item Approval of City License s Description The following individuals have applied for a Mechanical Licens e for 2013 . Staff has received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. Absolute Mechanical Contractors, LLC 2. Noah Acquisitions dba Benjamin Franklin 3. Corval Constructors, Inc. 4. Norblom Plumbing 5. Genz Ryan Plumbing and Heating 6. Kath HVAC 7. Standard Heating & A ir Conditioning The following individuals have applied for a Municipal Business License for 2013 . Staff has received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. Falcon Heights Gas & Convenience, Inc. 2. Minnesota Association of Secondary School Principals 3. Merw in Liquors Falcon Heights, LLC 4. Association of Metropolitan School Districts 5. Edward Jones 6. Cornerstone Construction Management, Inc The following individuals have applied for a Liquor License and Restaurant License for 201 3 . Staff has received the necessa ry documents for licensure. 1. Di Vo Jac, Inc. dba Dino’s Gyros 2. Stout’s Pub, LLC The following individuals have applied for a Massage Therapist License for 201 3 . Staff has received the necessa ry documents for licensure. 1. Feren cz -Mihaly Vincze -Turcean Meeting Date December 12 , 201 2 Agenda Item Consent F2 Attachment N/A Submitted By Michelle Tesser , Assistant to the City Administrator
Budget Impact Att achment(s) N/A Action(s) Requested Staff recommends that the Falcon Heights City Council approve the 2013 City License Applications .
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Families, Fields and Fair __________________________ The City That Soars! Item 2013 Commission Appointments Description Each year the City C ouncil appoints residents to serve on various city commissions. Below are my recommendations for residents to serve three year terms (201 3 -2015 ), as directed by the city code: Serena Jones -White, Park Commission (second term) Rebecca Montgomery, Environment Commission (second term) Christopher Minns, Planning Commission (secon d term) Ryan Wartick, Planning Commission (second term) Budget Impact N/A Att achment(s) Action(s) Requested I recommend that the residents listed above be appointed to three year terms to their respective commissions. Meeting Date December 12 , 201 2 Agenda Item Consent F3 Attachment Submitted By Peter Lindstrom, Mayor
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Families, Fields and Fair __________________________ The City That Soars! Item Recognition of 2012 Adopt -a -Crop Participants Description A few year s ago the City Council and Environment C ommission ini tiated an “Adopt -a -Crop” program. This idea was brought fort h by local resident Joni Fletty who started a similar program at her place of business and has updated the Falcon Heights Adopt a Crop Blog over the past season . Residents were encouraged to bri ng their excess fruits and vegetables to City H all where staff would weigh the donations and then deliver them to a local food shelf. In 2011, 1189.2 pounds of produce was donated. The results for this year were again impressive . The amount donated by i ndividuals this year include: Tom Staffa 1202 lbs . Ivan Marier 297 lbs . Peggy Hall 32 lbs . The Halvorson’s 25.5 lbs . Lois Braun 24 lbs . Sue Johnson 22 lbs . The Behrens’ 19 lbs . North Como Presbyterian Church Community Garden 18.5 lbs . City of Falco n Heights Park & Rec Department 17 lbs . Anne Holzman 15 lbs . Anonymous 5.5 lbs . Julie Plovnick 5 lbs . Lisa Betz 4 lbs . TOTAL 1686.5 lbs . Types of produce donated included corn, squash, tomatoes, zucchini, carrots, peppers, and many others. All o f the food was taken to Keystone Community Food shelves in Roseville and St. Paul. Meeting Date December 12, 2012 Agenda Item Consent F 4 Attachment N/A Submitted By Bart Fischer , City Administrator
Budget Impact N/A Att achment(s) None Action(s) Requested No action is required. This is being provi ded simply as an update to the C ouncil and to provide recognition of t he people who generously donated to this cause.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Families, Fields and Fair __________________________ The City That Soars! Item 2013 -2014 Forester Contract Description For the past 5 years, Andy Hovland, d/b/a Branch and B ough, has served as the C ity’s contract forester. His services have been very well received by residents and staff alike. He has been very instrumental in the Emerald Ash Borer mitigation program as well as assisting residents in evaluating trees on the ir own private property. Andy has requested extending the agreement from an annual to a 2 -year term. Staff feels comfortable recommending a 2 -year agreement based on the excellent working history with Andy. Staff recommends that the City continue workin g with Andy as the City Forester and that the attac hed Agreement be approved. Budget Impact Funds for this service are allocated in the 201 3 operating budget and are anticipated to be allocated in the 2014 operating budget as well . The hourly rate for t his Agreement is consistent with other contract foresters and with what Mr. Hovland has billed the City in 2012. Furthermore, it is anticipated that much of his time will be covered under grant funding tha t has been secured . Att achment(s) Professional Se rvices Agreement Action(s) Requested Staff recommends that the Falcon Heights City Council adopt the attached A greement with Andy Hovland, d/b/a Branch and Bough, for cons ultant forester services in 2013 & 2014 . Meeting Date December 12, 2012 Agenda Item Consent F 5 Attachment Professional Services Agreement Submitted By Bart Fischer , City Administrator
131455 v0 2 RNK:r 05/1 4 /2008 1 AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this _________ day of ___________________, 2012 , between the CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS , a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and ANDREW HOVLAND d/b/a Branch and Bough ("Consultant"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL UNDERTAK INGS HEREIN CONTAINED, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents", all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONSULTANT. The Consultant , a certified tree inspector, shall provide the services, and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents and applicable state law, Minn. Stat. 18G.16, and Rules, Minnesota Rules Chapter 1505, concerning shade tree disease control programs. 3. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY. The City shall pay the Consultant $50 per hourly basis in accordance with the attached plus mileage based upon the IRS ded uction rate. 4. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party may assign, sublet, or transfer any interest or obligation in this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. 5. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The term of this Agreement shall be from January 1 , 2013 through December 31, 2014 . 6. PAYMENT. The City will make periodic payment to the Consultant as the work is completed.. Such payment shall be made not later than thirty (30) days after invoicing by the Consultant. 7. PROMPT PAYMENT TO SUBCONSULTANTS. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 471.25, Subdivision 4a, the Consultant must pay any subconsultant within ten (10) days of the Consultant’s receipt of pa yment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subconsultant. The Consultant must pay interest of one and one -half percent (1½ %) per month or any part of a month to subconsultant on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subconsultant . The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Consultant shall pay the actual penalty due to the subconsultant. A subconsultant who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the Consultant
131455 v0 2 RNK:r 05/1 4 /2008 2 shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney’s fees, incurred in bringing the action. 8. WORKER’S COMPENSATION. Te Consultant shall obtain and maintain for the duration of this Contract, statutory Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance as required under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 9. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY. Consultant shall obtain the following minimum insurance coverage and mainta in it at all times throughout the life of the Contract, with the City included as an additional name insured: Bodily Injury: $1 ,000,000 each occurrence $1 ,000,000 aggregate, products and completed operations Property Damage: $1 ,000,000 each occurrence $1 ,000,000 aggregate Contractual Liability (identifying the contract): Bodily Injury: $1 ,000,000 each occurrence Property Damage: $1 ,000,000 each occurrence $1 ,000,000 aggregate Personal Injury, with Employment Exc lusion deleted: $1 ,000,000 aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability (owned, non -owned, hired): Bodily Injury: $100,000 each occurrence $50,000 each accident Property Damage: $100,000 each occurrence 10. DATA PRACTICES/RECORDS A. All data created, collected, received, maintained, or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Contract is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules ado pted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. B. All books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Consultant and its subconsultants, if any, relative to this Contract are subject to examination b y the City.
131455 v0 2 RNK:r 05/1 4 /2008 3 11 . WARRANTY. The Consultant shall exercise the same degrees of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the Services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a certified tree inspector under similar circumstances 12 . INDEMNITY. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any claim made by third parties as a result of the services performed by it. In addition, the Consultant shall reimburse the City for any cost of reasonable attorney's fees it may incur a s a result of any such claims. 13 . WAIVER. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Contract by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Contr act by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition, or obligation. 14 . INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains the Consultant as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Con sultant is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Consultant shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Consultant shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, a nd incidentals necessary for Consultant's performance under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree that Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's agents or employees are in any manner employees o f the City. Consultant shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Consultant's own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self -employment taxes if any such payments, amo unts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 15. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 16. SEVERABILITY. If any term or condition of this Contract is fo und to be or become unenforceable or invalid, it shall not effect the remaining provisions, terms, and conditions of this Contract, unless such invalid or unenforceable provision, term, or condition renders this Contract impossible to perform. Such remaini ng terms and conditions of the Contract shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties' entire contract. 1 7 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Contract represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a final, complete, an d all inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s), understandings, or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto.
131455 v0 2 RNK:r 05/1 4 /2008 4 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS B Y : ____________________________ ____________________________ Peter Lindstrom , Ma yor Andrew Hovland d/b/a Branch and Bough AND ___________________________ Bart Fischer , City Administrator
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Families, Fields and Fair __________________________ The City That Soars! Item M ileage reimbursement rate for 201 3 Description The business mileage reimbursement rate allowed by the IRS is 5 6 .5 cents p er mile effective January 1, 201 3 . This is a 1 cent per mile increase in the mileage rate allowed by the IRS in 2012 . Budget Impact The mileage reimbursement rate is 5 6 .5 cents per mile effective January 1, 201 3 . Att achment(s) NA Action(s) Requested Staff recommends allowing the IRS approved reimbursement mileage rate of 5 6 .5 cents per mile when employees use their personal vehicles for city business. Meeting Date December 12 , 201 2 Agenda Item Consent F6 Attachment Submitted By Roland Olson, Finance Director
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Families, Fields and Fair __________________________ The City That Soars! Item 2013 Fee Schedule Description Each year the City C ouncil is required to approve a fee schedule that identifies t he various fees charged by the C ity. Staff reviews these fees each year to ensure th at the costs charged cover the C ity’s expenses and so they are competitive with other cities of comparable size. Staff’s recommendations for 201 3 are incorporated into the attached draft fee schedule. Changes are noted in strikethrough and new language indicated by underlining . Budget Impact These fees have been incorporated into the 2013 budget. Att achment(s) Draft 2013 Fee Schedule Resolutio n 1 2 -16 Action(s) Requested Staff recommends that the Falcon Heights City Council adopt the attached Resolution 12 -16 approving the 2013 City of Falcon Heights fee schedule. Meeting Date December 12 , 201 2 Agenda Item Consent F7 Attachment Draft 2013 Fee Schedule Resolution 1 2 -16 Submitted By Bart Fischer , City Administrator
1 FEE SCHEDULE 2013 December 12, 2012 A. LICENSES 1. Business Licenses Item Fee Bus Benches (Courtesy) $ 25.00 per bench Filling Stations Less than 15 hours $ 100.00 15 -20 hours $ 400.00 20 hours or more $ 500.00 General B usiness $ 50.00 Pool Halls $ 800.00 Precious Metal Dealer Investigation fee/general $1500.00 Investigation fee/MN only $ 500.00 License fee $2000.00 Restaurants Lunchroom $ 50.00 Less than 15 hours $ 100.00 15 -2 0 hours $ 400.00 20 hours or more $ 500.00 Therapeutic Massage License Investigation fee $ 350.00 License fee $ 100.00 2. Liquor Licenses Item Fee Bottle Club $ 300.00 Liquor, Off -Sale $ 310 .00 Liquor, On -Sale $4000.00 Liquor, Special Event $ 25.00 Liquor, Sunday $ 200.00 Malt Beverage, Off -Sale $ 150.00 Malt Beverage, On -Sale $ 500.00 Malt Beverage, On -Sale (with wine license) $ 1.00 Wine License $2000.00 3. Other Licens es Item Fee Am usement machines (per machine) $ 30.00 Cigarette sales $ 250.00 Contractor licenses $ 3 5 .00 Itinerant salespersons & solicitors (for profit only) $ 25.00 (Charitable) Free Pool tables (per table) $ 30.00 Refuse Haulers $100.00 Rental License $ 50.00
2 B. PERMITS 1. Building permit fees: Total Valuation 2012 Fee $1.00 - $500.00 $25.00 $501.00 - $2,000.00 $25.00 for first $500, $3.25/each additional $100, to and including $2000 $2,001.00 - $25 ,000 $73.75 for first $2000, $14.75/each additional $1000, to and including $25,000 $25,001.00 - $50,000 $413.00 for first $25,000, $10.75/each additional $1000, to and including $50,000 $50,001.00 - $100,000.00 $681.75 for first $50,000, $7.50/each addi tional $1000, to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 - $500,000.00 $1,056.75 for first $100,000, $6.00/each additional $1000, to and including $500,000 $500,001.00 - $1,000,000.00 $3,456.75 for first $500,000, $5.00/each additional $1,000, to and inclu ding $1,000,000 $1,000,001 and up $5,956.75 for first $1,000,000, $4.00/each additional $1,000 Other Inspections and Fees: 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours $47.00 per hour 1 (minimum charge – two hours) 2. Reinspection fees assessed unde r provisions of Section 305.8 $47.00 per hour 1 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $47.00 per hour 1 (minimum charge – one -half hour) 4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to plans $47.00 per hour 1 (mi nimum charge – one -half hour) 5. For use of outside consultants for plan checking and inspections, or both actual costs 2 1 Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages, and fringe benefits of the employees involved. 2 Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs. *Building Permits are subject to the State Surcharge 2. Relocation of structure or building: $150.00 3. Demolition or r emoval of structure: $1.25/1,000 cubic ft; minimum $50.00
3 4. Mechanical permit fees a. Residential Work Base Fee $30 .00 Gas Piping $10.00 $500 valuation or less (repair or installation) $ 6 .00 Each additional $500 cost of repair or installatio n Gas or oil fired furnaces or boilers $2 5 .00 First 100,00 BTU input or less. $ 5 .00 Each additional 100,00 input or fraction thereof. Warm air or hot water heating system $30 .00 First 100,000 BTU input for construction, installation, alt eration, or replacement of each warm air furnace duct work or hot water system per unit. $ 6 .00 Each additional 100,000 BTU input or fraction thereof. $20 .00 First 100,000 BTU input per unit on unit heaters $ 5 .00 Each additional 100,000 BTU i nput or fraction thereof. Air conditioning $30 .00 First 5 tons (60,000 BTU) of air conditioning per unit or of cooling for duct work for air conditioning. $ 6 .00 Each ton (12,000 BTU) or fraction thereof over first 5 tons for duct work or air conditioning. Other Items $35 .00 Wood burning furnace per unit $35 .00 Swimming pool heater per unit $25 .00 Air exchanger with duct work per unit $25 .00 Gas or oil space heater per unit $25 .00 Gas direct vent heater per unit $25 .00 Gas f ireplace log or heater per unit $25.00 Gas hot water heater for domestic hot water b. Commercial Work Gas piping, refrigeration, chilled water, pneumatic control, ventilation, exhaust, hot water, steam, and warm air heating systems. This fee shall be $50 plus 1 -1/4 percent (1.25%) of the total valuation of the work. Value of the work must include the cost of installation, alteration, addition, and repairs, including fans, hoods, HVAC units and heat transfer units, and all labor and materials neces sary for installation. In addition, it shall include all material and equipment supplied by other sources when those materials are normally supplied by the contractor.
4 5. Plumbing Permit Fees. $30 .00 base fee plus $7.00 per fixture installed 6. Sewer Connection or Repair $50.00 7. Water Connection Meter Size Fee 3/4" $ 62.00 1" $ 115.00 1 -1/2" $ 265.00 2" $ 470.00 3" $1,080.00 8. Street Opening Fee $25.00 (plus cost of permit) 9. Fence Permit Fee $40.00 10. Driveway Permit Fee $25.00 11. Temporary Sign Permit $30.00 12. Permanent Sign Permit $50.00 13. Dumpster Permit $ 20.00 (30 days) $10.00 (14 days) (Dumpster permits can be renewed once) C. PLANNING FEES Item Fee Comprehensive Plan Amendment $550.00 Conditional Use Permit $500 .00 Design Review (when required by code) $ 50.00 Lot Split (one lot into two) $ 250.00 Planned Unit Development $ 500.00 Rezoning/Zoning Amendment $ 500.00 Subdivision (>1 new lot) $ 300.00 + $ 100.00/lot crea ted Variance $ 350.00
5 D. FACILITY RENTAL FEES Private use of public facilities is permitted on a space available basis. Reservations and damage are required and security deposits may be are required for private use of the following community fa cilities . Discounted rates are available for weekly bookings : Park and Facility Rental Fees * For park building rentals there is a $200 damage depos it required that needs to be made in a separate form than the payment. Deposit will be refunded upon return of the key and inspection of the park building. * Key pick up is two days prior to scheduled event and can be picked up at City Hall Monday –Friday 8:00am -4:30pm, (Summer hours: 7:30am - 5:00pm Monday -Thursday, Friday 7:30am -noon Memorial Day - Labor Day) * Keys can be dropped off at the key box located on the city hall building (near the front doors ) or during City Hall office hours. * Park building rental permits will be issued when payment is received. Holding reservations without payment is not accepted. *If you plan on bringing any equipment (i.e. inflatable devices, dunk tanks etc.) into the park you must disclose this to a c ity employee during the reservation process. The city may require documentation such as: a hold harmless agreement or certificate of insurance naming the city has an additional insured. Venue Amenities included in rental Half Day 9am -3pm 4pm -10pm Full Day 9am -10pm Community Park Building and Upper Picnic Area 2050 Roselawn Ave. (corner of Roselawn and Cleveland) Park Building Full Kitchen (stove, oven, frig/freezer, sink, microwave) Tables and Chairs Inside Bathrooms 2 BBQ Grills 9 Outdoor picnic tables Parking lot (50) and off street parking $100.00 + Tax $200.00 + Tax East Pi cnic Area (near playground) 2 Picnic Tables Trash receptacles Portable bathroom Parking lot (50) and off street parking $20.00 + Tax $35.00 + Tax Lower Picnic Area (Southwest corner of park) 2 Picnic Tables 1 BBQ Grill Trash receptacles Portable b athroom Parking lot (50) and off street parking $20.00 + Tax $35.00 + Tax Curtiss Field Building and Picnic Shelter 1551 W. Iowa Ave. Park building Inside Bathrooms Playground Basketball hoop and half court 2 picnic tables Portable bathroom Parking lo t (10) and off street parking $50.00 + Tax $100.00 + Tax Rentals: Play Kit Play kit variety of balls, frisbees, and other play equipment $15.00 + Tax Set up/Tear Down $25.00 Formatted: Font: 10 pt Formatted: Font: 9 pt
6 City Hall Rental Fees City Hall Capacity Rates (3 hours) Hours must fall within half/fu ll hours Half Day 9am -3pm 4pm -10pm Full Day 8am -10pm Council Chambers Full Room (includes kitchen facility) 150 75 - Seated $115.00 $175.00 $250.00 Council Chambers Front Half 75 30 Seated $50.00 $100.00 $150.00 Council Cha mbers Back Half 75 30 Seated $50.00 $100.00 $150.00 Kitchen Facility 10 6 Seated $25.00 $50.00 $50.00 Conference Room 8 maximum $30.00 $60.00 $100.00 Set Up Fee Excludes governmenta l entities $25.00 * For city hall rentals there is a $200 damage deposit required that needs to be made in a separate form than the payment. Deposit will be refunded upon return of the key and inspection of the park building. * Key pick up is two days prior to scheduled event and can be picked up at City Hall Monday –Friday 8:00am -4:30pm, (Summer hours: 7:30am - 5:00pm Monday -Thursday, Friday 7:30am -noon Memorial Day - Labor Day) * Keys can be dropped off at the key box located on the city hall building (near the front doors) or during City Hall office hours. * Building rental permits will be issued when payment is received. Holding reservations without payment is not accepted.
7 Field/Court/Rink Rental Fees You may rent Community Park’s soccer field, t ennis courts or basketball courts and Curtiss Field’s ice rink (seasonal). Discounted rates are available for weekly bookings. Renters Fee (3 2 hr. block time) Fee Seasonal 3 2 hr block time April -October Consecutive times in one week Additional Hours Resident $20+ tax - $10 + tax Non Resident $30+ tax - $10 + tax Youth Organizations ages 2 -18 (must be open to serving residents of Falcon Heights) $20+ tax 2 -3 1 -2 times per week $50.00 4 -5 3 -4 times per week $100.00 6 -7 5 -7 times per week $150.00 $10 + tax Adult Organizations $30+ tax 2 -3 1 -2 times per week $75.00 4 -5 3 -4 times per week $125.00 6 -7 5 -7 times per week $175.00 $10 + tax Striping a soccer field $25 case by case basis Fees apply only for games and practices. Tournaments or special eve nts/services are subject to additional fees. Field r ental permits will be issued when payment is received. Disclaimer: All short term rentals (1 -5 times) entitle the customer to use of the field as is: anything additional will be the customer’s responsi bili ty (i.e. striping the field or providing bases.) Special request of services will be dealt with on a case by case basis and may include extra fees. All requests should be discuss ed with the Parks and Recreation Department at 651 -792 -7617.
8 E. FACILI TY USE BY PUBLIC SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 1. Public facilities are available for use on a reservation basis. 2. The following shall be allowed use of public facilities but set up/tear down fees apply : a. Specifically listed local organizations: • Leagu e of Women Voters • Senior Citizen Groups (Falconeers, Roseville Area Seniors) • Ramsey County League of Local Governments • League of Minnesota Cities/Association of Metropolitan Municipalities • Watershed management organizations • Scouts, Brownie Troops, 4 -H, Cam pfire • Neighborhood Groups (e.g. Grove Association, Maple Knoll Courtyard Homeowner’s Association) • 55 Alive Mature Driving Class • Cable Commission • Developers when presenting to neighbors • Legislators for informational (non -campaign) meetings, except after the filing date and before the November election of a legislative election year unless requested by a majority of the city council • Northwest Youth and Family Service • Lauderdale and Falcon Heights Lions Club • Roseville Rotary Club • Party Precinct caucuses, legi slated district conventions and county conventions under the requirements of MN State Statute 202A.192 • AARP Tax Services • Hobby groups or clubs that meet the following criteria: o Falcon Heights based (A minimum of 25% of on -going members or participants are Falcon Heights residents ). o Non -profit o Open membership o Founded on a hobby o Actively reaches out to include people of different ages, especially youth, to encourage intergenerational exchanges of information o Encourages a community service and/or benefit compo nent • Falcon Heights neighborhood or community groups whose activities are open to all and for the sole purpose of developing, fostering and strengthening neighborhood and community well -being. b. Any organization that meets the above guidelines yet uses a facility more than twice a year shall be charged $100 per year. c . The organization or group cannot be a private, business, political, or religious organization. d. Any organization denied free use under this po licy as defined in this section m ay appeal to the city council.
9 F. MISCELLANEOUS FEES. Item Fee Agendas (Council or Planning) 1 $15.00/year City Council Minutes 1 $35.00/year Planning Commission Minutes 1 $20.00/year Single copies $ .25 /page for first 100 pages Assessment search $20.00 Maps $ 6.50 Open burning permit $25.00 (no charge for recreational fires) Returned Check Fee $25.00 1 The charges apply only when hard copies are mailed. T hese documents can be view ed free o f charge on the website or at City Hall. G. FALSE ALARM FEES 1. Fire False Alarms $175.00 for second false alarm and $225.00 for the third and all subsequent false alarms at an address within one calendar year. 2. Security False Alarms $60 .00 for second call and $75 .00 for the third and each subsequent false alarm at an address within one calendar year. 3. Penalties and Assessment Penalties for late payment and assessment of unpaid fees are the same as stipulated for unpaid utility fee s in the city code. H. VEHICLE EMERGENCY RESPONSE The fee for emergency personnel response to accidents is $350.00/vehicle. I . PARKING FEES Item Fee Application fee for residential area permit parking $ 200.00 Annual residential area parking permits First two vehicles $ 15.00/vehicle T hird and subsequent vehicles $ 25.00/vehicle Lost permit replacement $ 7.00 Temporary parking permit (up to 3 weeks) $ 3.00/vehicle Temporary parking permit for 5 or more vehicles for a one -t ime/ one -day event $ 25.00/event Mobile Storage Structure (up to 72 hours) $ 10.00 J. RENTAL HOUSING RE -INSPECTIONS $50.00 for third and subsequent inspections K . SANITARY SEWER The sanitary sewer fee for residential units is $26.5 0 28.75 per quarter plus $.0173559 0188311 per cubic foot of water usage during the months of November – January. For apartment units, the rate will be $26.50 28.75 /unit/quarter plus $.0173559 0188311 per cubic foot of water used in November. For residential units, this will serve as the maximum fee for other quarters throughout the year, but the actual amount billed may be lower depending on water usage. For commercial units, the fee is $.0173559 .0188311 per cubic foot of water usage during each month.
10 L . STORM DRAINAGE The fee for storm drainage is $19.75 22.00 per quarter for residential units and $184.33 205.32 per acre for commercial a nd apartment units. M . HYDRANT WATER The fee for hydrant water is 6 % surcharge of the water bill. N . RECYCLING The rec ycling charge is $9.00 75 per quarter for residential units. O. STREET LIGHTING The street lighting fee is $6.00 per quarter for residential units and $0.02 per lineal foot frontage for commercial properties monthly. O P . FEES FOR UNSPECIFIED REQUESTS A private party or public institution (hereinafter applicant) making a request to the City for approval of a project or for public assistance must cover the City's consultants' costs associated with reviewing the request. Prior to having the request conside red by the City, the applicant must deposit an escrow fee in an amount that is estimated to cover the City's consultants' costs as determined by the City Administrator. If the City's consultants' costs exceed the initial escrow deposited by the applicant, an additional escrow fee will be required to cover the additional costs. The City shall use the applicant's fees to cover the City's actual consultants' costs in reviewing the request regardless of the City's action on the applicant's request. If the ap plicant's escrow fees exceed the City's actual consultants' costs for reviewing the request, the remaining escrow fees shall be refunded to the applicant. Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5"
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Resolution No. 12 -16 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE THE CITY COUNCIL OF FALCON HEIGHTS RESOLVES: The City of Falcon Heights Fee Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by r eference is hereby adopted. This schedule shall be effective upon passage. ADOPTED this 12 th day of December 2012 , by the City Council of Falcon Heights, Minnesota. Moved by: Approved by: ________________________ Peter Lindstrom, May or December 12, 2012 LINDSTROM ____ In Favor Attested by: _________________________ GOSLINE Justin Miller HARRIS City Administrator LONG December 12, 2012 MERCER -TAYLOR ____ Against
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Families, Fields and Fair __________________________ The City That Soars! Item Budget amendment to the Parks Program Special Revenue Fund (201) Description Additional revenues and expenses are being re cognized in the Parks Program Fund from the Tae Kwon Do classes and other specialty classes such as Yoga. In addition, the city is offering a Winter Break Adventure Camp b efore the end of the year. Staff recommends amending the revenue budget and expe nse budget to reflect th ese additional revenue and expen diture increases for 201 2 . Budget Impact I ncreas e the non -resident recreation fees revenue line item by 3 ,0 00 and the resident recreation fees revenue line item by 4 ,000. Also, increas e the expe nditure line items for seasonal employee s by 3 ,000, and specialty instructor s by 4,0 00 . Att achment(s) NA Action(s) Requested Staff recommends the following budget amendments to the Parks Program Special Revenue Fund 201 for 201 2 : Increase 4 ,000 to the resident recreational fees revenue line budget item. Increase 3 ,000 to the non -resident recreational fees revenue line budget item. Increase 3 ,000 to the seasonal employee expenditure line budget item. Increase 4,0 00 to the specialty instructor expenditure line budget item. Meeting Date December 1 2 , 20 1 2 Agenda Item Consent F8 Attachment Submitted By Roland Olson, Finance Director
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Families, Fields and Fair __________________________ The City That Soars! Description Metro Transit has requested the City’s support for Metro Transit’s application for Chapter 152 Transit Funding from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Background In 201 1 -2012 Metro Transit conducted a study of the benefits and costs of arterial bus rapid transit on eleven metropolitan area corridors. Th e upgraded bus service envisioned would add rider capacity and improve trip frequency and speeds by making use of easy -on and off vehicles, pre -boarding ticket purchase and coord inated traffic lights, among other measures. The study identified S nelling Avenue/Ford Parkway/46 th Street as the top candidate for early implementation of arterial bus rapid transit. Metro Transit has now set in motion implementation of ABRT on Snelling by setting up a project office and seeking funding for the project. In 2008 the Minnesota Legislature provided $50 million in bonding for improvements to trunk highway corridors. The Snelling corridor project qualifies for this funding, and Metro Transit i s seeking $6 million toward implementation of the project . Application for this Chapter 152 funding requires a written statement of support from each municipality on the trunk highway corridor. The proposed resolution offers support from the City of Falco n Heights. Budget Impact None Att achment(s) • Draft Resolution 12 -17 in support of Metro Transit’s funding request to MnDOT for implementation of the proposed arterial bus transit way on Snelling Avenue • Minnesota Department of Transportation Chapter 152 L etter • Map and station conce p t s for the proposed Snelling corridor project Action(s) Requested • Approve Resolution 1 2 -17 Meeting Date December 12 , 2012 Agenda Item Consent F9 Title Resolution Supporting Metro Transit’s Funding Request from MnDOT for the Snelling Avenue Arterial Bus Rapid Transit Implementation Submitted By Deborah Jones, Director of Zoning and Planning
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS COUNCIL RESOLUTION December 12 , 2012 No. 12 -17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE METRO TRANS IT’S FUNDING REQUEST FROM MNDOT THROUGH THE CHAPTER 152 STATEWIDE TRANSIT GRANT SOLICITATION PROGRAM WHEREAS , Metro Transit wishes to make transit improvements to State Trunk Highway 51 by building arterial bus rapid transit stations (Project); and, Wher eas , the Project will be of mutual benefit to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Metro Transit, and the City of Falcon Heights; and, Whereas, Metro Transit is requesting financial participation for allowable construction costs of the Proj ect from MnDOT as noted and through the Chapter 152 Transit Grant Solicitation Program; and, Whereas, Metro Transit is committed to providing all other non -eligible costs of the Project as well as any construction costs exceeding the award amount and for any agreed on -going costs for operation or maintenance as noted in the solicitation; and, Whereas, Metro Transit is committed to completing the Project if selected and funding is provided in part through the Chapter 152 Statewide Transit Grant Solicitati on Program; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Falcon Heights hereby supports the Project and Metro Transit’s funding request from MnDOT for the construction of the project. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moved by: Approved by: ________________________ Peter Lindstrom, Mayor December 12 , 2012 LINDSTROM ____ In Favor Attested by: ________________________ GOSLINE Bart Fischer HARRIS ____ Against City Administrator LONG December 12 , 2012 MERCER -TAYLOR
April 2012 Final Report 21 SNELLING AVENUE RAPID BUS CONCEPT
Me tr op ol it an C ou nc il Extra Small Prototype Street View With Back Wind Screen P rototypical Station S helter C oncepts Ra P id bu S C on CEP t Small Prototypes Medium Prototypes Large Prototypes Street View With Back Wind Screen Sidewalk View With Back Wind Screen Street View With Back Wind Screen Street View Street View Street View Sidewalk View Street View
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Families, Fields and Fair __________________________ The City That Soars! Item Receive Feasibility Report and Order Public Hearing for the 201 3 Pavement Management Program Description On October 12, 2011 and August 8, 2102, the City Council ordered the preparation of a feasibility report for the 201 3 Pavement Management Pr oject (PMP ). The following streets have been identified to be considered for improvements in 2013: • East Snelling Aven ue Service Drive, Idaho Avenue to dead end • Albert Street, from Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue • Pascal Street, from Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue • Arona Street, from Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue • Arona Street, from Crawford Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue • Crawford Avenue, from Snelling Avenue to Simpson Street • Hollywood Court , from Snelling Avenue Frontage Road to alleys • Alley between Larpenteur Ave nue and California Ave nue , from Albert St reet to Hamline Ave nue • Alley between Larpenteur Avenue and Crawford Avenue, from Snelling Avenue to Arona Street In accordance with City Council direction, a feasibility report has been prepared that details the proposed design, neighborhood impact, and estimated cost of the proposed 2013 Pavement Management Program. Co pies of the completed feasibility report are attached. The next step in the process is for the Council to accept the feasibility report and to schedule a public hearing. A resolution receiving the feasibility report and ordering the public hearing for J anuary 9, 2013, is attached. A portion of the 201 3 PMP is proposed to be assessed. The approval of the attached resolution is required for the Minnesota Chapter 429 Assessment Process. Budget Impact This project has the following financial implications for the city and property owners along the streets being considered for maintenance: • Assessments levied in accordance with the City’s assessment policy. • Use of Municipal State Aid (MSA), Tax increment financing (TIF), and street Meeting Date December 12 , 2012 Agenda Item Consent F10 Attachment Feasibility Report, Resolution 12 -18 Submitted By Kristine Giga, Civil Engineer
infrastructure funds to p ay the City’s portion of the project. • Expenditure of utility fund dollars to pay for repairs needed to the existing utility system. Att achment(s) Feasibility Report Resolution 12 -18 Action(s) Requested Receive Feasibility Report and Order Public Hearing for t he 2013 Pavement Management Program
2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 5 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .................................................................................................................................... 7 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................................... 9 G ENERAL C OMMENTS .............................................................................................................................................. 9 S PECIAL C ONSIDERATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 10 A. Street Design .................................................................................................................. 10 B. Alley Design .................................................................................................................... 11 C. Utility Conditions ............................................................................................................ 12 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 15 G ENERAL C OMMENTS ............................................................................................................................................ 15 S PECIAL C ONSIDERATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 15 A. Street Improvements ...................................................................................................... 15 B. Alley Improvements ........................................................................................................ 16 C. Utility Improvements ...................................................................................................... 16 D. Permits ............................................................................................................................ 18 ESTIMATED COSTS AND PROPOSED FUNDING ............................................................................................... 19 A. Street Assessments ......................................................................................................... 19 B. Alley Assessments ........................................................................................................... 20 C. Schedule ......................................................................................................................... 23 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................... 24 EXHIBIT A: LOCATION MAP ........................................................................................................................... 25 EXHIBIT B: ASSESSMENT PARCELS ................................................................................................................ 26 EXHIBIT C: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL ................................................................................................ 27 EXHIBIT D: SOIL BORING LOGS ...................................................................................................................... 28
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 2
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 3 December 12, 2012 Honorable City Council City of Falcon Heights 2077 W. Larpenteur Avenue Falcon Heights, Minnesota 55113 ‐5594 RE: 2013 Pavement Management Project Dear Mayor and City Council Members: At the council meeting of October 12, 2011 and August 8, 2012, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility study for the improvements to the streets included in the 2013 Pavement Management Project. This study considers proposed improvements to the following streets: East Snelling Avenue Service Drive, Idaho Avenue to dead end Albert Street, from Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue Pascal Street, from Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue Arona Street, from Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue Arona Street, from Crawford Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue Crawford Avenue, from Snelling Avenue to Simpson Street Hollywood Court, from Snelling Avenue Frontage Road to alleys Alley between Larpenteur Avenue and California Avenue, from Albert Street to Hamline Avenue Alley between Larpenteur Avenue and Crawford Avenue, from Snelling Avenue to Arona Street As a part of the study for this area, the various public utilities have been analyzed regarding their capacity and structural integrity. Necessary utility improvements have then been recommended where appropriate. In accordance with the City Council request, this study has been completed. It is my recommendation that the projects as proposed in this study are feasible. Sincerely, Kristine Giga, P. E. Civil Engineer
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 4
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 5 INTRODUCTION On October 12, 2011 and August 8, 2012, the City Council adopted resolution # 11 ‐12 and 12 ‐09 authorizing the preparation of a feasibility study for the improvements to the streets included in the 2013 Pavement Management Project. This report consists of a detailed investigation of the streets proposed for improvements, listed below. A map showing the street locations can be found in Appendix A: East Snelling Avenue Service Drive, Idaho Avenue to dead end Albert Street, from Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue Pascal Street, from Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue Arona Street, from Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue Arona Street, from Crawford Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue Crawford Avenue, from Snelling Avenue to Simpson Street Hollywood Court, from Snelling Avenue Frontage Road to alleys Alley between Larpenteur Avenue and Crawford Avenue, from Snelling Avenue to Arona Street Alley between Larpenteur Avenue and California Avenue, from Albert Street to Hamline Avenue The proposed project involves street and alley reclamation, spot curb replacement and storm sewer structure repairs. As has been discussed during development of the CIP, the City Council has expressed the desire to complete maintenance on City streets that, if neglected for too long, would need to be reconstructed. The proposed 2013 PMP achieves this, while also maintaining a neighborhood approach. The neighborhood approach minimizes the inconveniences residents experience due to construction. Utility improvements for the project include the repair of selected sanitary manholes, storm sewer manholes and catch basins, and construction of bioinfiltration trenches. The watermain system is owned and operated by St. Paul Regional Water Services, who has identified minimal repairs needed to the system. The total project cost is estimated to be $1,227,149, which includes contingencies and overhead costs. Funding for the project will be provided through assessments from the benefitting properties, sanitary sewer utility funds, surface water management utility funds, street infrastructure funds, Tax Increment Financing (TIF), and Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds. It is expected that if these improvements are approved, the work will be completed during the 2013 construction season. This project is necessary, cost ‐effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint and should be constructed as proposed in this Report. It is expected that if these improvements are approved, the work will be completed during the 2013 construction season. As outlined by state law, projects initiated by council/staff require a 4/5 vote by the City Council for approval.
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 6
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 7 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT An informational meeting was held on December 4, 2012, for residents who live within the proposed 2013 PMP project. The meeting lasted approximately two hours. Meeting notices were sent out two weeks in advance to 124 residences. Approximately 20 people attended, representing 14 properties. The meeting was an open house format, where staff was available to discuss the City’s Pavement Management Program, the roadways being proposed for improvement, and the City’s Assessment Policy. Most of the questions City staff received pertained to the timing and necessity of the improvements, the scope of the project, the proposed project schedule, and traffic volumes. Residents also had questions regarding the assessment policy, particularly with respect to the multi ‐family residential assessment rate.
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 8
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 9 EXISTING CONDITIONS General Comments The project areas include single family, apartment buildings, town homes, and commercial properties. The neighborhoods are fully developed. All of the streets are delineated with concrete curb and gutter; the alleys do not have curb and gutter. Segments of the project area have concrete sidewalks, but there is no continuous sidewalk along the entire length of any segment. Falcon Heights’ pavement management system utilizes a pavement condition index (PCI) rating of 0 to 100. This rating is based on surficial pavement observations. Street condition ratings are divided into three categories: “adequate” (66 to100), “marginal” (36 to 65) and “problem” (0 to 35). Generally, the indices correspond to a level of most cost effective improvement as follows: problem = pavement reconstruction; marginal = asphalt overlay; and adequate = sealcoat and/or crack sealing. This rating system assists in prioritizing roadway improvements and projecting costs for use in the City’s pavement management and capital improvements plan. Studies conducted by a number of agencies indicate that as pavement conditions decrease, the cost for the appropriate method of repair can quadruple. A graph of a typical case taken from the American Public Works Association, The Hole Story, is shown in the following figure. The 2010 street ratings, compiled by GoodPointe Technology, are listed in the table below, as well as the previous ratings from 2007. Using GoodPointe Technology’s pavement management software, ratings can be
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 10 projected based on the observed street condition and anticipated deterioration of the road. These estimated 2013 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) values have also been listed. Street 2007 Rating 2010 Rating Est. 2013 Rating 2013 Category East Snelling Avenue Service Drive, Idaho to dead end 64 45 31 Problem Albert Street, Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue 76 68 58 Marginal Pascal Street, Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue 75 65 54 Marginal Arona Street, Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue 77 68 57 Marginal Arona Street, Crawford Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue 76 66 55 Marginal Crawford Avenue, Snelling Avenue to Arona Street 79 62 51 Marginal Crawford Avenue, Arona Street to Simpson Street 72 48 34 Marginal/ Problem Hollywood Court, Snelling Avenue Frontage Road to alleys 74 65 54 Marginal Alley between Larpenteur Avenue and Crawford Avenue, Snelling Avenue to Arona Street 75 50 36 Marginal/ Problem Alley between Larpenteur Avenue and California Avenue, Albert Street to Hamline Avenue 58 44 30 Problem Actual levels of street improvements are determined by obtaining soil borings and a comprehensive geotechnical evaluation report. Soil borings have been obtained and are included in the appendix of this report. City staff has reviewed the soil boring results and have verified that the recommended improvements as described are appropriate. Special Considerations A. Street Design The streets vary from 25 feet to 40 feet in width. The alleys are 14 to 15 feet wide, and do not have curb and gutter. All of the existing streets are located within a 60 ‐foot right ‐of ‐way, except for Hollywood Court and the East Snelling Service Drive, which are within a 40 ‐foot right of way. The streets have an average pavement thickness of 3 to 4 inches, with a subsurface consisting mainly of silty sands. The roads are 25 to 35 years old. 1. East Snelling Service Drive (Idaho Avenue to dead end) This street is located just east of Snelling Avenue and north of Idaho Avenue. This street serves three apartment buildings and dead ends where the Town Square development begins. The pavements show signs of distress, such as transverse and longitudinal cracking, alligator cracking, areas of settlement, and potholes. There is evidence of previous maintenance, including patching and seal coating. The pavement surface shows signs of severe oxidation, as evidenced by the exposed pavement aggregates. This street was originally constructed by Mn/DOT as the Snelling Service Drive, and was turned back to the City in 1993. 2. Albert Street, Pascal Street, Arona Street (south of Larpenteur) These primarily residential streets are located between Snelling and Hamline Avenues and south of Larpenteur Avenue, in the Northome neighborhood. Arona,
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 11 from Larpenteur to Idaho, has the highest average daily traffic volume in the neighborhood. The pavements show signs of distress, such as transverse and longitudinal cracking, alligator cracking, areas of settlement, and potholes. There is evidence of previous maintenance, including crack sealing and seal coating. The pavement is raveling and deteriorating along the edge of the curb and gutter, which is indicative of drainage issues. Drainage issues are also visible at the cross streets of Iowa, Idaho and California. Pascal and Albert were constructed in 1984. Arona was constructed in 1976. 3. Arona Street (north of Larpenteur), Crawford Avenue These streets are located east of Snelling Avenue and north of Larpenteur Avenue. Arona, from Larpenteur to Crawford, and Crawford, from Arona to Snelling, have some of the highest average daily traffic volumes in the Northeast neighborhood, aside from Garden and Roselawn Avenues. The pavements show signs of distress, such as transverse and longitudinal cracking, areas of settlement, pavement shoving around manholes, and potholes. There is pavement raveling and deterioration along the edge of the curb in some areas. Previous maintenance includes patching, crack sealing and seal coating. These streets were originally constructed in 1976. 4. Hollywood Court This residential street is located west of Snelling Avenue and south of Larpenteur Avenue. This street does not connect to any other streets, and serves only these residents. The pavement shows signs of distress, such as transverse and longitudinal cracking, alligator cracking, potholes and areas of settlement. There is evidence of previous maintenance, including patching, crack sealing and seal coating. This street was originally constructed in the late 1970s. B. Alley Design The alley between Larpenteur and California from Albert to Hamline has an 18 ‐foot right ‐of ‐way, and the alley between Larpenteur and Crawford from Snelling to Arona has a 20 ‐foot right ‐of ‐way. The alleys have an average pavement thickness 4 inches, with a subsurface consisting mainly of silty sands. 1. Alley between Larpenteur Avenue and Crawford Avenue (from Snelling Avenue to Arona Street) This alley abuts six residential properties, and Falcon Crossing. Dino’s Gyros also is located next to, although none of their property is directly adjacent to, the alley. The alley is exhibiting signs of distress including severe cracking, potholes, and poor drainage. There is evidence of previous maintenance, including seal coating and patching. This alley was milled and overlayed in 2001. 2. Alley between Larpenteur Avenue and California Avenue (from Albert Street to Hamline Avenue) This alley serves all single ‐family properties with the exception of one property, the Super America gas station. The alley exhibits moderate to severe transverse and longitudinal cracking. In areas this has developed into alligator cracking. The alley also exhibits potholes and areas of poor drainage. Previous maintenance includes seal coating and patching. The alley was originally constructed in 1986.
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 12 C. Utility Conditions City utilities located within the project limits include storm sewer, water, and sanitary sewer. A summary of the City’s utilities are listed below. Private utilities include gas, electric, cable television, and telephone. 1. Water System St. Paul Water Utility maintains the water system in Falcon Heights. They have indicated that the existing system within the project area is in good condition. 2. Sanitary Sewer System The existing conditions for the sanitary sewer system were obtained from City as ‐built drawings and televised recordings, which are a part of the City’s routine maintenance practices. City staff also inspected all sanitary sewer manholes within the project limits to determine if maintenance should be performed in conjunction with the street improvement project. The recommended manhole and pipe maintenance is discussed later in this report. In the Northome neighborhood, most of the sanitary sewer is located on the east ‐west streets. The following is a table of the existing sanitary sewer with information on pipe size, pipe material, and any problems noted from the televising. The sanitary sewer was constructed in the late 1950’s. Street Pipe Size, Material, Comments East Snelling Avenue Service Drive, Idaho to dead end 8” clay Albert Street, Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue No pipe along Albert Pascal Street, Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue No pipe along Pascal Arona Street, Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue 8” clay from Larpenteur to Idaho; Separated joint Arona Street, Crawford Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue No pipe along this segment Crawford Avenue, Snelling Avenue to Arona Street 8” clay Crawford Avenue, Arona Street to Simpson Street 8” clay Hollywood Court, Snelling Avenue Frontage Road to alleys 8” clay, lined 2011 3. Storm Sewer System/ Drainage All street and private property drainage east of Snelling drains to storm sewer that connects to the Roseville and St. Paul storm systems. Storm water from these neighborhoods ultimately drains to Como Lake. The street and private property drainage west of Snelling (namely, Hollywood Court,) drain west into a concrete swale that runs through the State Fairgrounds. The storm water entering the storm sewer system receives little to no pre ‐treatment for water quality. Most street drainage is overland with minimal storm sewer conveyance. Generally, drainage is channeled along the edges of the streets and relies on the curb and gutter to keep the drainage impounded. Some of the streets have concrete valley gutters through intersections to aid the flow of storm water.
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 13 The existing storm sewer is generally in adequate condition. Some of the existing structures are old, block constructed structures that have deteriorated and reached the end of their useful life. There are also areas within the project that have poor drainage due to inadequate crown on the street. These streets are relatively flat; any changes in pavement elevation, such as settlements, potholes, etc., from freeze ‐thaw cycles have also inhibited proper drainage on the streets. Upgrades to the existing neighborhood drainage system are recommended for properly managing storm drainage from the roadway and provide treatment prior to discharge into the storm sewer system. The recommended storm drainage system improvements are discussed later in this report.
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 14
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 15 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION General Comments Staff evaluated all of the streets and alleys listed in this report and compared visual observations to the projected 2013 PCI values calculated by the GoodPointe software. The estimated 2013 PCI values are in line with what staff observed in the field. Due to the existing conditions of the roadways as previously outlined and as shown in the soil borings, City staff recommends that all of the proposed streets and alleys within the project be improved with a bituminous reclamation, unless otherwise noted. Bituminous reclamation (or reclaim) involves grinding the existing asphalt surface and underlying aggregate base together, which creates a new uniform roadway base material. Some of the reclaimed material is then removed in order to meet the existing curb and gutter grades. Finally, the new base is graded and compacted in preparation for the new bituminous pavement. Special Considerations All items in this section of the report have been presented and discussed with the residents during the public involvement process. A. Street Improvements As shown on the soil borings, all of the existing roadways within the project have varying thicknesses of bituminous pavement and aggregate base. Refer to the Appendix for the soil boring results. On average, the new section for all the roadways will have approximately 6 ‐inches of reclaimed base material with 4 ‐inches of new bituminous pavement. This recommended improvement will meet the City’s and State Aid’s minimum standard for a 7 ‐ton design roadway. The following streets proposed for improvements are designated State Aid streets: Albert Street, from Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue Arona Street, from Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue Arona Street, from Crawford Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue Crawford Avenue, from Snelling Avenue to Arona Street Typically, designated State Aid streets that are rehabilitated must meet a 9 ‐ton design. However, streets with average daily traffic volumes less than 5,000 vehicles per day may be built to meet a 7 ‐ton design. The average daily traffic on all of these street segments is less than 2,000 vehicles per day. All of the improved roadways will maintain their existing widths. By preserving the existing curb lines along the roadways, the new vertical alignments will match the in ‐place alignments. The streets have segments of curb and gutter which have sunk, are deteriorated or have been damaged; spot curb replacement is proposed as needed on each of the streets. Necessary corrections to the roadway subgrade will be made in areas exhibiting more severe signs of distress or if poor soils are discovered prior to placing the bituminous pavement. The reclaimed base will be graded with sufficient crown (slope from the centerline to the curb) to allow for proper drainage. Storm water runoff will sheet flow across the pavement into the curb and
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 16 gutter. It will then follow the gutter line until it reaches the storm sewer system. Concrete valley gutters will be constructed through intersections as needed to facilitate the movement of storm water runoff. If driveways are impacted for spot curb removal or more extensive pavement/subgrade corrections, the removed portion of the driveway will be replaced in ‐kind with asphalt or concrete. Any sod that is damaged as a result of the project will be replaced. B. Alley Improvements 1. Alley between Larpenteur Avenue and Crawford Avenue, from Snelling Avenue to Arona Street This alley was last improved in 2001 with a mill and overlay. Since then, the pavement has deteriorated, developing severe cracking and potholes. The relatively flat grade of the alley also does not provide for adequate drainage. The condition of the alley is such that more extensive repairs need to be made. Staff evaluated two options. The first is to reclaim the alley, as is proposed for the streets, and repave a bituminous alley. This would allow for re ‐establishing an aggregate base, as well as grading and shaping to improve the drainage along the alley. Because asphalt is considered a flexible pavement that can shift when the ground freezes and thaws, staff recommends adding storm sewer to the alley to improve the drainage. The details of the storm sewer improvements would be determined during final design. The second option evaluated is to construct the alley with a concrete pavement. This alley is mostly used by the adjacent commercial properties, and there is a higher volume on this alley than most alleys in the City. Concrete pavement typically is more durable in this type of environment, and more long ‐lasting. Concrete is a rigid pavement, and more suited to carry storm water runoff over relatively flat grades. Concrete pavement typically lasts 40 to 50 years, whereas bituminous pavement typically lasts 20 to 25 years, prior to needing major maintenance. If concrete is used, it reduces the need for storm sewer to improve drainage. The costs differences are discussed later in this report. 2. Alley between Larpenteur Avenue and California Avenue, from Albert Street to Hamline Avenue This alley was originally constructed in 1986, and has reached the end of its useful life. Staff recommends reclaiming this alley. The grade on this alley is relatively flat, causing drainage problems. To improve drainage, staff recommends constructing a 2 ‐foot wide longitudinal concrete valley gutter the entire length of the alley. Because concrete is a rigid pavement, it is more conducive to carrying storm water runoff over relatively flat grades. This will allow the storm water to reach the existing catch basins, as opposed to ponding in low points in the pavement along the alley. C. Utility Improvements Existing manholes, fire hydrants, gate valves, and other similar structures will be adjusted and repaired as necessary as part of this project. The cost of underground utility improvements will be excluded from the assessable portion of the project and financed by the appropriate utility funds. City staff will coordinate with private utility owners such as gas, electric, cable television, and telephone throughout the construction project.
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 17 1. Water System City staff has contacted St. Paul Water Utility (SPWU) regarding the proposed 2013 project area. Initial comments from SPWU indicate that the existing watermain within the project area does not have a history of watermain breaks, and no improvements are scheduled. If any needed improvements or repairs are identified during final design, City staff will work with SPWU to incorporate the needed maintenance into the plans and specifications. 2. Sanitary Sewer System The recommended sanitary sewer system improvements are relatively minor and include maintenance on all manholes. Manhole castings will be replaced with new, standard sized castings with concealed pick holes and chimney seals to reduce the potential for inflow and infiltration. All of the pipe segments within the project have been televised and inspected. One segment has been identified for repair. A section along Arona Street from Larpenteur to California has separated joints and has settled; this correction needs to be made by digging up and replacing approximately ten feet of pipe. The remainder of the pipe within the project area is in sufficient operating condition. It is recommended, however, to program these segments in a future sanitary sewer main lining project. The clay pipe is over 50 years old, and is susceptible to root intrusion and cracking, which can cause infiltration. Cured ‐in ‐place pipe lining is effective at eliminating infiltration and provides the structural integrity of a new pipe. 3. Storm Sewer System and Water Quality Public Works has identified several block ‐constructed catch basins in need of replacement. The grout between the concrete blocks has deteriorated to a point where it is more cost effective to replace the structure with one that is pre ‐cast than it is to repair the existing structure. Pre ‐cast structures are monolithic and are not as susceptible to joint/grout deterioration as block structures. Areas identified with poor drainage will be analyzed in more detail during final design. Specific locations identified during the field survey were at intersection with the cross streets. Some of the intersections have existing concrete valley gutters, which are intended to guide runoff along the gutter line through the intersection to reach the intended catch basin. However, since the pavement has heaved or sunk around the concrete, the valley gutters are ineffective. These will be removed and replaced in conjunction with additional improvements. Potential improvements to these areas include extending storm sewer and installing new catch basins, modifying the grade to improve the drainage flow towards existing catch basins, or installing a Best Management Practice, which is described below. a. Storm Water Management ‐ Curtiss Field Drainage Study The Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) is in the process of completing a drainage study at Curtiss Field. Curtiss Pond was originally designed to be an infiltration area; however, existing conditions are such that the pond does not drain. CRWD is investigating the reason for this, as well as identifying potential solutions and improvements to resolve this issue within the park. As a part of the study, CRWD is also evaluating the contributing upstream drainage area and identifying potential upstream improvements that could help alleviate some of the flooding at Curtiss Field. Upstream improvements will be incorporated into the design of this project.
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 18 Storm water management is often achieved by constructing Best Management Practices (BMPs.) BMPs are features such as infiltration basins, bio ‐filtration basins, rain gardens, underground filtration cells, and filtration strips. Storm water runoff is directed to BMPs, where it filters through an engineered soil media that provides time for sediments and nutrients to settle out, discharging cleaner water into the storm sewer system or infiltrating into the native, undisturbed sandy soils. Not only do BMPs help manage storm water volume and rate control, but they are also used to improve the water quality of storm water runoff in the area. BMPs that are incorporated into this project will be designed to meet Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requirements. b. Erosion Control As part of the project plans and specifications, staff is required to prepare a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) for the purposes of enforcing erosion and sediment control rules. The SWPPP will include erosion and sediment control methods that will be implemented throughout the project. Silt fence, bio ‐rolls, erosion control blanket, and other best management practices will be utilized where direct runoff might occur. Inlet protection will be used to protect both the existing and new catch basins during construction. Street sweeping will occur, as needed, on all paved street surfaces throughout the project, including intersecting streets. Exposed soils and aggregate material will be watered as needed as a dust ‐control measure. An erosion and sediment control plan sheet and storm water pollution prevention plan will be created during the design phase of this project. Immediate turf establishment in areas of soil disturbance will be required such as placing seed and erosion control blanket. After street and utility work is completed, sod will be placed as the permanent turf establishment in all disturbed areas. The City, in coordination with the watershed district, will closely monitor all erosion and sediment control measures throughout the construction process. The selected contractor will be required to install all preventative measures and maintain them as required by the City, CRWD, MPCA, and other regulatory agencies. D. Permits Permits will be required from the following agencies for the proposed project: Agency Required Permit Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) NPDES Erosion & Storm water Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) Storm water Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) Right ‐of ‐way Permit Ramsey County Right ‐of ‐way Permit During final design for the project, City staff will coordinate with each of the agencies to ensure all requirements are met.
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 19 ESTIMATED COSTS AND PROPOSED FUNDING Proposed project costs for the 2013 PMP Improvement Project (including bituminous streets, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and restoration) are summarized below. The cost estimate is based on recent construction projects of similar character and assumes that the proposed improvements would begin in 2013. Actual costs will be determined through competitive bids following final design for the project. Therefore the actual costs will be dependent upon the market conditions that exist at the time of the bidding. Estimated Cost* MSA Street Infrastructure Funds TIF*** Assessments Sanitary Sewer Fund Storm Sewer Fund**** Street Improvements $848,487.74 $150,000.00 $272,332.14 $58,600.00 $367,555.60 $0 $0 Alley Improvements** $136,536.89 $0 $13,673.85 $0 $122,863.04 $0 $0 Storm Sewer Improvements $240,224.40 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $240,224.40 Sanitary Sewer Improvements $1,900.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,900.00 $0 Total $1,227,149.04 $150,000.00 $286,006.00 $58,600.00 $490,418.64 $1,900.00 $240,224.40 *Includes 17% Engineering **for purposes of this table, the costs for a concrete alley were used. ***TIF funds will be used where eligible on the project, as determined by the Finance Director and the City’s Finance consultants. **** The 2013 Budget includes $179,440 for storm sewer improvement on this project. It is anticipated that some of the improvements will be a result of the Curtiss Field Drainage Analysis. Capitol Region Watershed District has monies budgeted for improvements, which may also include areas upstream from Curtiss Field. The proposed project is eligible for assessments according to the City of Falcon Heights Assessment Policy. Per City Policy, a portion of the street improvements will be assessed to the benefitting properties. Along with assessments, street costs will be financed through the Street Infrastructure Fund and Municipal State Aid. Typically, only roads that have been added to the City’s Municipal State Aid system (MSA) are eligible for funding through the City’s portion of state gas tax revenues. However, the City of Falcon Heights has a Certified Municipal State Aid Street system. As a result, the City can use MSA funds to pay for the City’s portion of the project costs. Utility improvements will be funded from the appropriate infrastructure fund, and are not assessable. Assessments will be levied to the benefitting properties as outlined in Minnesota State Statute Chapter 429 and the City’s Assessment Policy, which is summarized below. The assessed amount is levied on a front footage basis, or rear footage, in the case of alley assessments. The City Council may deviate from any portion of the Assessment Policy as deemed appropriate. Assuming this project is completed by fall 2013, the final assessment amount would be determined following an assessment hearing in the fall of 2013 and a thorough review of the proposed assessments by the Council. A. Street Assessments
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 20 The following City of Falcon Heights assessment policies are being followed: Corner lots assessed 100% long, 0% short side If the property being assessed is a non ‐single family residential parcel, both sides will be assessed. Mill & Overlay (Reclaim) Assessment Rates: o Residential ‐ 40% of project cost o Commercial and Multi ‐Unit Residential ‐ 60% of project cost Assessment Summary ‐ Streets Estimated total street construction cost $848,487.74 Total Assessable Frontage 9,227.34 ft Engineer's recommended street assessment: 60% of project cost/ foot $55.17 40% of project cost/ foot $36.78 B. Alley Assessments The following City of Falcon Heights assessment policies are being followed for the alleys in this project: Alley Assessment Rates: o Residential, Multi ‐Unit Residential and Commercial ‐ 90% of project cost The Assessment Policy states that for alleys which also serve non ‐residential purposes, a traffic study will be performed to determine the amount of traffic created by the non ‐residential users and the assessment amounts will be altered to reflect estimated usage. It is the intent of this policy to set the assessment amount as fairly as possible, using best engineering practices, for all benefiting property owners. 1. Alley Traffic Study Traffic counts were collected for both alleys proposed for improvements, since both serve at least one non ‐residential property. SRF Consulting, Inc., was contracted by the City to collect video traffic counts over a two day period to establish average daily trips along each alley. The video method was used to be able to identify the destination of the traffic (commercial or residential). The results of the traffic counts are summarized below. a. Alley 1 (Alley between Larpenteur and Crawford, Snelling and Arona, or “Falcon Crossing” alley) The alley provides access to the Falcon Crossing Shopping Center, Dino’s Gyros, and six (6) residential properties. Of the six residential properties, two properties do not have garage access from the alley (one has access to Crawford Avenue; one has access to Arona Street). The average daily trips by user type along the alley are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 – Alley 1 Trip Summary Trip Type Average Daily Trips Percent Trips Commercial 365 trips 99% Residential 3 trips 1% Total Trips 368 trips 100%
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 21 The traffic data collected indicate that Alley 1 has an average daily traffic volume of 368 trips. o Commercial trips represent approximately 99 percent of the average daily trips. o Approximately two (2) percent of the commercial trips observed were considered heavy vehicles (i.e. garbage trucks, delivery trucks, etc.). o Residential trips represent approximately one (1) percent of the average daily trips. The peak traffic periods of the alley corresponded with the peak commercial trips, which represent the midday peak (approximately 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.) and the evening peak (approximately 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.) periods. o These peak periods are consistent with typical shopping center and restaurant land use peak periods. b. Alley 2 (Alley between Larpenteur and California, Albert and Hamline, or “Super America” alley) The alley provides access to 20 residential properties and two parking spaces for the Super America commercial property. Of the 20 residential properties, three properties do not have garage access from the alley (two have access to Albert Street; one has access to Hamline Avenue). The two parking spaces for the Super America commercial property serve primarily employee parking. However, garbage truck and delivery trucks for this commercial property were observed using the alley as well. The average daily trips by user type along the alley are summarized in Table 2. Table 2 – Alley 2 Trip Summary Trip Type Average Daily Trips Percent Trips Commercial 12 trips 13% Residential 83 trips 87% Total Trips 95 trips 100% The traffic data collected indicates that Alley 2 has an average daily traffic volume of 95 trips. o Commercial trips represent approximately 13 percent of the average daily trips. o Approximately 17 percent of the commercial trips observed were considered heavy vehicles (i.e. garbage trucks, delivery trucks, etc.). o Residential trips represent approximately 87 percent of the average daily trips. The peak traffic periods of the alley corresponded with the peak residential trips, which represent the a.m. peak (approximately 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.) and the evening peak (approximately 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.) periods. o These peak periods are consistent with typical residential land use peak periods. c. Interpretation of findings The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual is a collection of traffic studies completed for various land uses. The manual studies show that a typical trip count for residential properties is 12 average annual daily trips (AADT) per residence. The traffic counts for Alley 1 indicated an average of 0.5 trips per day per residence. The traffic counts for Alley 2 showed that there was an average of 4 trips per day per residence. It is difficult to reconcile the large difference between the ITE manual AADT with the counts
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 22 taken. We concluded that the two day count may not have captured a “typical” traffic count for shared commercial/ residential alleys. To acknowledge that the counts may have not been an accurate representation of a typical residential alley use, staff recommends that for determining the assessment rate, we use the following criteria: If results from traffic counts show a greater number than 4 trips per day per residence, then the actual number will be used. If results from traffic counts show that less than 4 trips per day per residence, than 4 trips per day will be assumed. The assumption of 4 trips per day is based on the counts from Alley 2 and an assumption that there are typically two trips in the morning and two trips at night for residential property owners. These assumptions help reconcile the differences between the ITE manual and counts taken for each of the alleys. 2. Recommendations Once the projected residential traffic is determined, residential and commercial percentages are calculated based on the total trips. This percentage is then applied to the assessable portion of the construction costs to determine the pro ‐rated amounts used to set the per foot costs. Assessment Summary ‐ Alley 1 (“Falcon Crossing”) Bituminous Estimated total alley construction cost ‐BITUMINOUS $57,144.20 90% assessable cost $51,429.78 7% Residential*$3,354.12 93% Commercial $48,075.67 Assessable Residential Footage 311.78 ft Assessable Commercial Footage 655.99 ft Engineer's recommended alley assessment: Residential cost/ foot $10.76 Commercial cost/ foot $73.29 Assessment Summary ‐ Alley 1 (“Falcon Crossing”) Concrete Estimated total alley construction cost ‐CONCRETE $88,117.85 90% assessable cost $79,306.06 7% Residential**$3,354.12 93% Commercial $75,951.95 Assessable Residential Footage 311.78 ft Assessable Commercial Footage 655.99 ft Engineer's recommended street assessment: Residential cost/ foot $10.76 Commercial cost/ foot $115.78
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 23 * The traffic counts showed less than 4 trips per day per residence. Therefore, 4 trips per day per residence was assumed to establish the residential percentage (6 parcels x 4 trips per day = 24 trips. The commercial balance was then taken from the total 368 trips counted = 344.) **Because the concrete pavement would be to accommodate the traffic volumes of the commercial properties, it is recommended that the residential properties are assessed for the cost of bituminous pavement, and the commercial property assumes the responsibility of the additional costs for concrete pavement. Assessment Summary ‐ Alley 2 (“Super America”) Bituminous Estimated total alley construction cost $48,419.05 90% assessable cost $43,577.14 87% Residential $38,072.66 13% Commercial $5,504.48 Assessable Residential Footage 1,048.28 ft Assessable Commercial Footage 136 ft Engineer's recommended alley assessment: Residential cost/ foot $36.32 Commercial cost/ foot $40.47 C. Schedule If the City Council approves the project for construction the following is the recommended schedule for this project. City Council Receives Feasibility Report and Orders the Public Improvement Hearing December 12, 2012 Conduct Public Improvement Hearing and Order Preparation of Plans and Specifications January 9, 2013 Neighborhood Open House to review Plans and Specifications February 2013 City Council Approves Plans and Specifications and Orders Ad for Bids February 2013 Anticipated Bid Opening March 2013 City Council Accepts Bids and Awards the Construction Contract April 2013 Begin Construction May 2013 Complete Construction August 2013 City Council Conducts the Assessment Hearing September 2013
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 24 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS A. All portions of the project proposed are feasible. B. Estimated project cost ‐ $1,227,149 (cost includes 17% engineering) The following is a summary of the recommendations discussed in this report. A. Construct the project in 2013. B. Construct the project as proposed in this report, with one of the following options. 1. Construct the “Falcon Crossing” alley with bituminous pavement. 2. Construct the “Falcon Crossing” alley with concrete pavement. C. Fund the street and alley construction with Municipal State Aid and TIF funds as allowed, street infrastructure funds, utility funds, and assessments as detailed in this report. D. Schedule a public hearing on Wednesday, January 9, 2013.
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 25 Exhibit A: Location Map
ALBERT ST N SNELLING AVE N IOWA AVE W CRAWFORD AVE SAINT MARYS ST ARONA AVE N HOLLY WOOD CT CALIFORNIA AVE W LARPENTEUR AVE W HOYT AVE W CRAWFORD AVE ARONA ST PASCAL ST N HOLTON ST LARPENTEUR AVE W LARPENTEUR AVE W ARONA ST PASCAL ST N CALIFORNIA AVE W CALIFORNIA AVE W ALBERT ST N ALBERT ST N PASCAL ST N IDAHO AVE W IDAHO AVE W IDAHO AVE W HOYT AVE W HOYT AVE W HOYT AVE W IDAHO AVE W IOWA AVE W I OWA AVE W IOWA AVE W HOYT AVE W HAMLINE AVE N HAMLINE LARPENTEUR AVE W HAMLINE AVE N 1667 1601 1533-1557 1643-1669 1639 1644 1555 1611 1729 1710 1728 1720 1700 1411 1717 1709 1700 1704 1710 1716 1724 1707 1347 1365 1642 1350 1691 1397 1723 1725 1576 1582 1582 1634 26 1407 1713 1703 1371 1492 1375 1532 1701 00 1397 8 1583 1453 1394 0 1565 1504 1436 1486 1466 1472 1510 1711 1511 1551 1522 1579 1389 1525 1707 1406 1391 1423 1412 1381 1416 1468 1485 1470 1513 1372 1480 1452 1442 1446 1432 1433 1407 1413 1386 1503 1469 1477 1358 1354 1422 1433 1422 1443 1387 1464 1368 1406 1506 1490 1496 1511 1700 1697 1529 1547 1546 1531 1525 1700 1570 1537 1433 1561 1720 1627 1488 1706 1462 1630 1701 1705 1523 1419 1468 1474 1478 1484 1488 1496 1469 1504 1463 1506 1510 1357 1381 1516 1700 1706 1611 1711 1723 1512 1540 17 1624 1717 1724 1522 1589 1445 1597 1713 1712 1717 1716 1723 1722 1729 1728 1618 1534 1712 1526 1532 1538 1718 1530 1540 1612 1546 1497 1603 1441 1625 1349 1390 1472 1485 1502 1617 1524 1688 1345 1473 1480 1484 1389 1469 1718 1717 1718 1715 1539 1724 1725 1724 1725 1724 1728 1731 1729 1728 1717 1725 1475 1483 1491 1495 1505 1549 1543 1382 1598 1542 1529 1375 1472 1479 1536 1535 1539 1367 1590 1372 1357 1607 1376 1377 1437 1395 1396 1545 1390 1387 1386 1368 1402 1359 1608 1468 1375 1464 1369 1358 1376 1354 1365 1355 1508 1381 1364 1348 1340 1412 1457 1359 1349 1427 1380 1402 1403 1355 1387 1354 1513 1341 1395 1403 1453 1418 1512 1391 1403 1349 1391 1358 1368 1484 1437 1376 1380 1386 1417 1402 1413 1402 1426 1434 1456 1348 1471 1503 1477 1447 1456 1366 1360 1390 1412 1407 1357 1340 1446 1452 1408 1369 1442 1489 1513 1361 1364 1503 1493 1494 1490 1457 1453 1504 1494 1365 1341 1438 1430 1467 1446 1471 1489 1604 1467 1426 1443 1468 1433 1396 1456 1457 1427 1358 1482 1478 1395 1379 1436 1493 1481 1477 1497 1381 1452 1481 1429 1493 1488 1373 1426 1416 1422 1471 1497 1432 1485 1497 1463 1442 1485 1433 1452 1437 1406 1413 1498 1415 1495 1483 1507 1463 1502 1446 1489 1425 1512 1437 1447 1417 1427 1361 1416 1375 1365 1382 1463 1507 1491 1376 1410 1476 1456 1463 1362 1464 1447 1457 1453 1453 1417 1436 1717 1534-1550 1423 1422 1396 1507 1443 1508 1442 1423 1367 1407 1449 1499 1503 1498 1443 1405 1403 1530 1703-1711 Prepared by:City of Roseville Engineering Department August 3, 2012 mapdoc: 2013PMP.mxd map: 2013PMP.pdf Data Sources and Contacts:* Ramsey County GIS Base Map (7/02/12)* City of Roseville Engineering Department For further information regarding the contents of this map contact:City of Roseville, Engineering Department,2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville MN DISCLAIMER:This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of rec ords,information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepar e this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or disc repancies are found please contact 651-792-7075. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2 000),and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and a grees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third partie s which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided.2013 Street and Alley Improvements ´0100200300400 Feet Proposed Projects CRAWFORD ST ARONA ST LARPENTEUR AVE SNELLING AVE
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 26 Exhibit B: Assessment Parcels
A L B E R T S T N I O W A A V E W A R O N A A V E N C A L I F O R N I A A V E W L A R P E N T E U R A V E W A R O N A S T P A S C A L S T N H O L T O N S T L A R P E N T E U R A V E W L A R P E N T E U R A V E W A R O N A S T P A S C A L S T N C A L I F O R N I A A V E W C A L I F O R N I A A V E W A L B E R T S T N A L B E R T S T N P A S C A L S T N I D A H O A V E W I D A H O A V E W I D A H O A V E W H O Y T A V E W H O Y T A V E W H O Y T A V E W I D A H O A V E W I O W A A V E W I O W A A V E W I O W A A V E W H O Y T A V E W H A M L I N E A V E N H A M L I N E A V E N 1 5 3 3 -1 5 5 7 1 6 4 3 -1 6 6 9 1 5 5 5 1 4 1 1 1 3 4 7 1 3 6 5 1 6 4 2 1 3 5 0 1 3 9 7 1 5 7 6 1 5 8 2 1 6 3 4 1 4 0 7 1 3 7 1 1 4 9 2 1 3 7 5 1 5 3 2 1 3 9 7 1 4 5 3 1 3 9 4 1 5 6 5 1 5 0 4 1 4 3 6 1 4 8 6 1 4 6 6 1 4 7 2 1 5 1 0 1 5 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 5 2 2 1 5 7 9 1 3 8 9 1 5 2 5 1 4 0 6 1 3 9 1 1 4 2 3 1 4 1 2 1 3 8 1 1 4 1 6 1 4 6 8 1 4 8 5 1 4 7 0 1 5 1 3 1 3 7 2 1 4 8 0 1 4 5 2 1 4 4 2 1 4 4 6 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 3 1 4 0 7 1 4 1 3 1 3 8 6 1 5 0 3 1 4 6 9 1 4 7 7 1 3 5 8 1 3 5 4 1 4 2 2 1 4 3 3 1 4 2 2 1 4 4 3 1 3 8 7 1 4 6 4 1 3 6 8 1 4 0 6 1 5 0 6 1 4 9 0 1 4 9 6 1 5 1 1 1 5 2 9 1 5 4 7 1 5 3 1 1 5 2 5 1 5 7 0 1 5 3 7 1 4 3 3 1 5 6 1 1 4 8 8 1 5 2 3 1 4 1 9 1 4 6 9 1 4 6 3 1 3 5 7 1 3 8 1 1 5 1 2 1 5 4 0 1 4 4 5 1 5 3 4 1 5 3 0 1 5 4 6 1 4 9 7 1 4 4 1 1 3 4 9 1 3 9 0 1 4 7 2 1 4 8 5 1 5 0 2 1 5 2 4 1 6 8 8 1 3 4 5 1 4 7 3 1 4 8 0 1 4 8 4 1 3 8 9 1 4 6 9 1 4 7 5 1 4 8 3 1 4 9 1 1 4 9 5 1 5 0 5 1 5 4 9 1 5 4 3 1 3 8 2 1 5 4 2 1 5 2 9 1 3 7 5 1 4 7 2 1 4 7 9 1 5 3 6 1 5 3 5 1 5 3 9 1 3 6 7 1 3 7 2 1 3 5 7 1 3 7 6 1 3 7 7 1 4 3 7 1 3 9 5 1 3 9 6 1 5 4 5 1 3 9 0 1 3 8 7 1 3 8 6 1 3 6 8 1 4 0 2 1 3 5 9 1 4 6 8 1 3 7 5 1 4 6 4 1 3 6 9 1 3 5 8 1 3 7 6 1 3 5 4 1 3 6 5 1 3 5 5 1 5 0 8 1 3 8 1 1 3 6 4 1 3 4 8 1 3 4 0 1 4 1 2 1 4 5 7 1 3 5 9 1 3 4 9 1 4 2 7 1 3 8 0 1 4 0 2 1 4 0 3 1 3 5 5 1 3 8 7 1 3 5 4 1 5 1 3 1 3 4 1 1 3 9 5 1 4 0 3 1 4 5 3 1 4 1 8 1 5 1 2 1 3 9 1 1 4 0 3 1 3 4 9 1 3 9 1 1 3 5 8 1 3 6 8 1 4 8 4 1 4 3 7 1 3 7 6 1 3 8 0 1 3 8 6 1 4 1 7 1 4 0 2 1 4 1 3 1 4 0 2 1 4 2 6 1 4 3 4 1 4 5 6 1 3 4 8 1 4 7 1 1 5 0 3 1 4 7 7 1 4 4 7 1 4 5 6 1 3 6 6 1 3 6 0 1 3 9 0 1 4 1 2 1 4 0 7 1 3 5 7 1 3 4 0 1 4 4 6 1 4 5 2 1 4 0 8 1 3 6 9 1 4 4 2 1 4 8 9 1 5 1 3 1 3 6 1 1 3 6 4 1 5 0 3 1 4 9 3 1 4 9 4 1 4 9 0 1 4 5 7 1 4 5 3 1 5 0 4 1 4 9 4 1 3 6 5 1 3 4 1 1 4 3 8 1 4 3 0 1 4 6 7 1 4 4 6 1 4 7 1 1 4 8 9 1 4 6 7 1 4 2 6 1 4 4 3 1 4 6 8 1 4 3 3 1 3 9 6 1 4 5 6 1 4 5 7 1 4 2 7 1 3 5 8 1 4 8 2 1 4 7 8 1 3 9 5 1 3 7 9 1 4 3 6 1 4 9 3 1 4 8 1 1 4 7 7 1 4 9 7 1 3 8 1 1 4 5 2 1 4 8 1 1 4 2 9 1 4 9 3 1 4 8 8 1 3 7 3 1 4 2 6 1 4 1 6 1 4 2 2 1 4 7 1 1 4 9 7 1 4 3 2 1 4 8 5 1 4 9 7 1 4 6 3 1 4 4 2 1 4 8 5 1 4 3 3 1 4 5 2 1 4 3 7 1 4 0 6 1 4 1 3 1 4 9 8 1 4 1 5 1 4 9 5 1 4 8 3 1 5 0 7 1 4 6 3 1 5 0 2 1 4 4 6 1 4 8 9 1 4 2 5 1 5 1 2 1 4 3 7 1 4 4 7 1 4 1 7 1 4 2 7 1 3 6 1 1 4 1 6 1 3 7 5 1 3 6 5 1 3 8 2 1 4 6 3 1 5 0 7 1 4 9 1 1 3 7 6 1 4 1 0 1 4 7 6 1 4 5 6 1 4 6 3 1 3 6 2 1 4 6 4 1 4 4 7 1 4 5 7 1 4 5 3 1 4 5 3 1 4 1 7 1 4 3 6 1 5 3 4 -1 5 5 0 1 4 2 3 1 4 2 2 1 3 9 6 1 5 0 7 1 4 4 3 1 5 0 8 1 4 4 2 1 4 2 3 1 3 6 7 1 4 0 7 1 4 4 9 1 4 9 9 1 5 0 3 1 4 9 8 1 4 4 3 1 4 0 5 1 4 0 3 1 5 3 0 2 2 3 .5 8 '1 2 5 .5 '1 6 .8 6 ' p e r u n i t 8 0 .6 7 '1 3 6 '7 9 .6 7 '1 2 0 '1 2 0 '1 3 4 .6 5 '1 2 0 '1 2 5 .6 9 '1 2 5 .6 9 '1 2 0 '1 3 4 .6 5 '1 2 4 .6 5 '1 2 4 .6 6 '1 2 5 .5 '5 5 .8 5 '5 6 '1 2 5 .7 '1 2 4 .7 4 '1 2 5 .7 5 '1 2 5 .7 '1 2 5 .6 9 '1 2 4 .6 6 '1 2 5 .6 9 '1 2 0 .8 2 '1 2 4 .6 6 '1 2 0 .8 1 '1 2 0 .8 2 '1 2 0 .8 2 '1 2 5 .7 6 '1 2 5 .7 6 '1 2 4 .6 6 '1 2 5 .7 5 '1 2 0 .8 1 '1 2 0 .8 8 '1 2 0 .8 8 '1 2 0 .8 1 '1 2 4 .7 4 '1 2 5 .6 9 '1 2 4 .7 4 '1 2 0 '5 0 '1 2 0 '1 2 0 .8 9 '1 2 0 '1 2 4 .7 4 '1 2 0 .8 8 '5 0 '1 2 0 '1 2 0 '1 2 5 .6 9 '1 2 4 .6 5 '5 0 '5 0 '5 0 '5 0 '5 0 '5 0 '5 0 '5 0 '5 0 '5 0 '5 0 '5 0 '5 0 '5 9 '6 4 '6 3 '4 8 5 .6 9 '5 9 .5 7 '1 2 0 .8 1 '1 2 0 .8 2 'P r e p a r e d b y :C i t y o f R o s e v i l l e E n g i n e e r i n g D e p a r t m e n t D e c e m b e r 4 , 2 0 1 2 m a p d o c : 2 0 1 3 P M P A s s e s s m e n t s .m x d m a p : 2 0 1 3 P M P A s s e s s m e n t s .p d f D a t a S o u r c e s a n d C o n t a c t s :* R a m s e y C o u n t y G I S B a s e M a p (1 0 /2 9 /1 2 )* C i t y o f R o s e v i l l e E n g i n e e r i n g D e p a r t m e n t F o r f u r t h e r i n f o r m a t i o n r e g a r d i n g t h e c o n t e n t s o f t h i s m a p c o n t a c t :C i t y o f R o s e v i l l e , E n g i n e e r i n g D e p a r t m e n t ,2 6 6 0 C i v i c C e n t e r D r i v e , R o s e v i l l e M N D I S C L A I M E R :T h i s m a p i s n e i t h e r a l e g a l l y r e c o r d e d m a p n o r a s u r v e y a n d i s n o t i n t e n d e d t o b e u s e d a s o n e . T h i s m a p i s a c o m p i l a t i o n o f r e c o r d s ,i n f o r m a t i o n a n d d a t a l o c a t e d i n v a r i o u s c i t y , c o u n t y , s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l o f f i c e s a n d o t h e r s o u r c e s r e g a r d i n g t h e a r e a s h o w n , a n d i s t o b e u s e d f o r r e f e r e n c e p u r p o s e s o n l y . T h e C i t y d o e s n o t w a r r a n t t h a t t h e G e o g r a p h i c I n f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m (G I S ) D a t a u s e d t o p r e p a r e t h i s m a p a r e e r r o r f r e e , a n d t h e C i t y d o e s n o t r e p r e s e n t t h a t t h e G I S D a t a c a n b e u s e d f o r n a v i g a t i o n a l , t r a c k i n g o r a n y o t h e r p u r p o s e r e q u i r i n g e x a c t i n g m e a s u r e m e n t o f d i s t a n c e o r d i r e c t i o n o r p r e c i s i o n i n t h e d e p i c t i o n o f g e o g r a p h i c f e a t u r e s . I f e r r o r s o r d i s c r e p a n c i e s a r e f o u n d p l e a s e c o n t a c t 6 5 1 -7 9 2 -7 0 7 5 . T h e p r e c e d i n g d i s c l a i m e r i s p r o v i d e d p u r s u a n t t o M i n n e s o t a S t a t u t e s §4 6 6 .0 3 , S u b d . 2 1 (2 0 0 0 ),a n d t h e u s e r o f t h i s m a p a c k n o w l e d g e s t h a t t h e C i t y s h a l l n o t b e l i a b l e f o r a n y d a m a g e s , a n d e x p r e s s l y w a i v e s a l l c l a i m s , a n d a g r e e s t o d e f e n d , i n d e m n i f y , a n d h o l d h a r m l e s s t h e C i t y f r o m a n y a n d a l l c l a i m s b r o u g h t b y U s e r , i t s e m p l o y e e s o r a g e n t s , o r t h i r d p a r t i e s w h i c h a r i s e o u t o f t h e u s e r 's a c c e s s o r u s e o f d a t a p r o v i d e d .2 0 1 3 S t r e e t a n d A l l e y I m p r o v e m e n t s (E a s t A r e a )´0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 F e e t P a r c e l s t o b e A s s e s s e d S t r e e t I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t S i n g l e -F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l w i t h S h o r t -S i d e A d j a c e n t t o P r o j e c t ; N o t A s s e s s e d
U N D E R W O O D S T N F R Y S T S N E L L I N G A V E N C R A W F O R D A V E S A I N T M A R Y S S T H O L L Y W O O D C T C R A W F O R D A V E A R O N A S T P A S C A L S T N L A R P E N T E U R A V E W L A R P E N T E U R A V E W A R O N A S T P A S C A L S T N C A L I F O R N I A A V E W I D A H O A V E W I D A H O A V E W L A R P E N T E U R A V E W 1 6 6 7 1 6 0 1 1 6 8 7 1 5 3 3 -1 5 5 7 1 6 4 3 -1 6 6 9 1 6 3 9 1 6 4 4 1 6 1 1 1 7 2 9 1 7 1 0 1 7 2 8 1 7 2 0 1 7 3 4 1 7 0 0 1 6 4 2 1 6 9 1 1 7 2 5 1 5 8 2 1 6 3 4 1 7 2 6 1 7 3 6 1 7 1 3 1 7 0 3 1 4 9 2 1 7 0 0 1 7 1 8 1 5 8 3 1 7 1 0 1 7 3 5 1 5 0 4 1 4 8 6 1 4 6 6 1 4 7 2 1 5 1 0 1 7 1 1 1 7 3 0 1 5 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 4 6 8 1 4 8 5 1 4 7 0 1 5 1 3 1 4 8 0 1 5 0 3 1 4 6 9 1 4 7 7 1 4 6 4 1 5 0 6 1 4 9 0 1 4 9 6 1 5 1 1 1 5 4 7 1 5 4 6 1 5 3 1 1 5 2 5 1 5 6 1 1 7 2 0 1 6 2 7 1 7 3 0 1 4 6 2 1 6 3 0 1 4 6 8 1 4 7 4 1 4 7 8 1 4 8 4 1 4 8 8 1 4 9 6 1 4 6 9 1 5 0 4 1 4 6 3 1 5 0 6 1 5 1 0 1 5 1 6 1 7 0 0 1 6 1 1 1 7 2 5 1 6 2 4 1 5 2 2 1 5 8 9 1 5 9 7 1 6 1 8 1 5 2 6 1 5 3 2 1 5 3 8 1 5 4 0 1 6 1 2 1 4 9 7 1 6 0 3 1 6 2 5 1 4 8 5 1 6 1 7 1 7 3 2 1 6 8 8 1 4 7 3 1 4 6 9 1 7 1 8 1 7 1 7 1 7 1 8 1 7 1 5 1 5 3 9 1 7 2 4 1 7 2 5 1 7 2 4 1 7 2 5 1 7 2 4 1 7 2 8 1 7 3 1 1 7 2 9 1 7 2 8 1 7 3 2 1 7 3 5 1 7 3 1 1 7 1 7 1 7 2 5 1 4 7 5 1 4 8 3 1 4 9 1 1 4 9 5 1 7 3 1 1 7 3 5 1 5 0 5 1 5 9 8 1 4 7 9 1 5 9 0 1 6 0 7 1 6 0 8 1 4 8 4 1 6 0 4 1 4 9 3 1 4 7 1 1 4 9 7 1 4 9 5 1 4 8 3 1 5 0 2 1 4 8 9 1 5 1 2 1 4 6 3 1 5 0 7 1 4 9 1 1 4 7 6 1 4 6 3 1 7 1 7 1 5 3 4 -1 5 5 0 1 4 9 9 1 5 0 3 1 4 9 8 1 5 3 0 1 7 0 3 -1 7 1 1 2 2 3 .5 8 '1 2 5 .5 '1 6 .8 6 ' p e r u n i t 1 7 3 .5 '8 0 .6 7 '7 9 .6 7 '1 2 0 '1 2 0 '1 2 0 '6 0 '1 2 0 '7 5 '7 3 '5 4 '5 4 '5 4 '5 4 '5 4 '1 5 9 .0 6 '6 7 .3 '1 2 4 .6 6 '6 5 '1 5 9 .0 4 '6 6 '6 1 .6 '6 5 '5 0 '5 0 '5 0 '6 5 '6 1 '1 2 5 .5 '1 3 3 .8 '1 3 3 .8 '1 3 3 '1 3 3 .8 '5 5 '5 5 '1 2 4 .7 4 '1 2 0 '1 2 0 '1 2 0 '1 2 0 '1 2 0 '5 0 '6 1 .6 '6 1 .5 '5 6 '5 5 '5 5 '3 9 .5 '1 7 0 .3 '4 8 5 .6 9 '5 1 .7 8 '5 9 .5 7 'A S B U R Y S T S I M P S O N S T 6 0 '5 0 '5 0 '5 0 '5 0 'P r e p a r e d b y :C i t y o f R o s e v i l l e E n g i n e e r i n g D e p a r t m e n t D e c e m b e r 4 , 2 0 1 2 m a p d o c : 2 0 1 3 P M P A s s e s s m e n t s .m x d m a p : 2 0 1 3 P M P A s s e s s m e n t s .p d f D a t a S o u r c e s a n d C o n t a c t s :* R a m s e y C o u n t y G I S B a s e M a p (1 0 /2 9 /1 2 )* C i t y o f R o s e v i l l e E n g i n e e r i n g D e p a r t m e n t F o r f u r t h e r i n f o r m a t i o n r e g a r d i n g t h e c o n t e n t s o f t h i s m a p c o n t a c t :C i t y o f R o s e v i l l e , E n g i n e e r i n g D e p a r t m e n t ,2 6 6 0 C i v i c C e n t e r D r i v e , R o s e v i l l e M N D I S C L A I M E R :T h i s m a p i s n e i t h e r a l e g a l l y r e c o r d e d m a p n o r a s u r v e y a n d i s n o t i n t e n d e d t o b e u s e d a s o n e . T h i s m a p i s a c o m p i l a t i o n o f r e c o r d s ,i n f o r m a t i o n a n d d a t a l o c a t e d i n v a r i o u s c i t y , c o u n t y , s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l o f f i c e s a n d o t h e r s o u r c e s r e g a r d i n g t h e a r e a s h o w n , a n d i s t o b e u s e d f o r r e f e r e n c e p u r p o s e s o n l y . T h e C i t y d o e s n o t w a r r a n t t h a t t h e G e o g r a p h i c I n f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m (G I S ) D a t a u s e d t o p r e p a r e t h i s m a p a r e e r r o r f r e e , a n d t h e C i t y d o e s n o t r e p r e s e n t t h a t t h e G I S D a t a c a n b e u s e d f o r n a v i g a t i o n a l , t r a c k i n g o r a n y o t h e r p u r p o s e r e q u i r i n g e x a c t i n g m e a s u r e m e n t o f d i s t a n c e o r d i r e c t i o n o r p r e c i s i o n i n t h e d e p i c t i o n o f g e o g r a p h i c f e a t u r e s . I f e r r o r s o r d i s c r e p a n c i e s a r e f o u n d p l e a s e c o n t a c t 6 5 1 -7 9 2 -7 0 7 5 . T h e p r e c e d i n g d i s c l a i m e r i s p r o v i d e d p u r s u a n t t o M i n n e s o t a S t a t u t e s §4 6 6 .0 3 , S u b d . 2 1 (2 0 0 0 ),a n d t h e u s e r o f t h i s m a p a c k n o w l e d g e s t h a t t h e C i t y s h a l l n o t b e l i a b l e f o r a n y d a m a g e s , a n d e x p r e s s l y w a i v e s a l l c l a i m s , a n d a g r e e s t o d e f e n d , i n d e m n i f y , a n d h o l d h a r m l e s s t h e C i t y f r o m a n y a n d a l l c l a i m s b r o u g h t b y U s e r , i t s e m p l o y e e s o r a g e n t s , o r t h i r d p a r t i e s w h i c h a r i s e o u t o f t h e u s e r 's a c c e s s o r u s e o f d a t a p r o v i d e d .2 0 1 3 S t r e e t a n d A l l e y I m p r o v e m e n t s (W e s t A r e a )´0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 F e e t P a r c e l s t o b e A s s e s s e d S t r e e t I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t S i n g l e -F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l w i t h S h o r t -S i d e A d j a c e n t t o P r o j e c t ; N o t A s s e s s e d
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 27 Exhibit C: Preliminary Assessment Roll
2013 Pavement Management Project Falcon Heightscommercial/multi unit rate:55.17 $ Preliminary Assessment Rollresidential rate:36.78 $ Street Improvements Parcel IDPropertyAddress Assessable footage (LF)Assessment rate ($/LF)Proposed Assessment NotesOwner Name 1Owner Name 2Owner Street AddressOwner City/State/Zip COMMERCIAL/MULTI UNI T 1529233301050 SNELLING AVE N (1700)173.555.17 $ 9,572.00 $ Dino's main parcelADAMIDIS PROPERTIES LLC1700 Snelling Ave NFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐5726 1529233301361533 LARPENTEUR AVE W125.555.17 $ 6,923.84 $ Falcon CrossingFALCON CROSSING LLCCO WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT1625 Energy Park Dr Ste 100St Paul MN 55108 ‐2703 1529233301391700 SNELLING AVE N39.555.17 $ 2,179.22 $ Second parcel for Dino'sADAMIDIS PROPERTIES LLC1700 Snelling Ave NFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐5726 1529233301400 SNELLING AVE N (1533)148.555.17 $ 8,192.75 $ frontage on north side of alley ‐ Falcon CrossingFALCON CROSSING LLCWELLINGTON MANAGEMENT INC1625 Energy Park Drive Ste 100St Paul MN 55108 ‐2703 2229232201451530 LARPENTEUR AVE W (0)223.5855.17 $ 12,334.91 $ ApartmentsTOWN SQUARE SR APTS LLCSHERMAN ASSOC INC233 Park Av S #201Minneapolis MN 55415 ‐1132 1529233301351688 ARONA ST125.555.17 $ 6,923.84 $ ApartmentsLEONARD L CARLSONLORRAINE E CARLSON1600 Englewood Ave Ste 100Saint Paul MN 55104 ‐1225 2229232200561561 IDAHO AVE W59.5755.17 $ 3,286.48 $ ApartmentsGARFIELD STREET LLC2601 Sunset Blvd Unit 3gMinneapolis MN 55416 ‐4370 2229232200571634 SNELLING AVE N79.6755.17 $ 4,395.39 $ ApartmentsGARFIELD STREET LLC2601 Sunset Blvd Unit 3gMinneapolis MN 55416 ‐4370 2229232200581642 SNELLING AVE80.6755.17 $ 4,450.56 $ ApartmentsGARFIELD STREET LLC2601 Sunset Blvd Unit 3gMinneapolis MN 55416 ‐4370 2229232200011466 LARPENTEUR AVE W12055.17 $ 6,620.40 $ ApartmentsMARVIN A FLODIN8 Scotch Pine RdNorth Oaks MN 55127 ‐2032 2229232200071510 LARPENTEUR AVE W12055.17 $ 6,620.40 $ ApartmentsDONALD E SOBANIAJOANNE M SOBANIA1510 Crawford StFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐0251 2229232201491669 ARONA ST, Unit 116.8655.17 $ 930.17 $ townhomeGERALD A DRAPERALEXANDRA C E DRAPER1669 Arona St Unit 1Falcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2351 2229232201501665 ARONA ST, Unit 216.8655.17 $ 930.17 $ townhomeTONYA SLATTERY1665 Arona St #2Falcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2351 2229232201511661 ARONA ST, Unit 316.8655.17 $ 930.17 $ townhomeAMY J EICHORNMITCHELL D EICHORN139 Raleigh Dr Apt 1dElizabethtown KY 42701 ‐4138 2229232201521657 ARONA ST, Unit 416.8655.17 $ 930.17 $ townhomeJUSTIN S GRAVINGMICHELLE L OPHAUG1657 Arona St #4Falcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2351 2229232201531653 ARONA ST, Unit 516.8655.17 $ 930.17 $ townhomeJIAJIA DONG1 Dent DrLewisburg PA 17837 ‐2005 2229232201541649 ARONA ST, Unit 616.8655.17 $ 930.17 $ townhomeJOHN P PICHA REV INEVIVOS TRUCO JOHN P PICHA1649 Arona St #6Falcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2351 2229232201551645 ARONA ST, Unit 716.8655.17 $ 930.17 $ townhomeTROY D HELLERGLORIA E LOPEZ FRANCO1645 Arona St Unit 7Falcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2351 2229232201561667 ARONA ST, Unit 816.8655.17 $ 930.17 $ townhomeJOANNA G LEE1667 Arona St Unit 8Falcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2351 2229232201571663 ARONA ST, Unit 916.8655.17 $ 930.17 $ townhomeKAREN M JOHNSON1663 Arona St #9Falcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2351 2229232201581659 ARONA ST, Unit 1016.8655.17 $ 930.17 $ townhomeAMY ELIZABETH KANGAS1659 Arona StFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2351 2229232201591655 ARONA ST, Unit 1116.8655.17 $ 930.17 $ townhomeKYLE B FOSTER1655 Arona StFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2351 2229232201601651 ARONA ST, Unit 1216.8655.17 $ 930.17 $ townhomeARONA HOUSE LLC1651 Arona StFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2351 2229232201611647 ARONA ST, Unit 1316.8655.17 $ 930.17 $ townhomeJULIE ANN HANDBERG TRUSTEE1647 Arona St Unit 13Falcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2351 2229232201621643 ARONA ST, Unit 1416.8655.17 $ 930.17 $ townhomeGARY R BERGERMARTHA I SNIDER1643 Arona St #14Falcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2351 subtotal footage 1532.03 RESIDENTIAL 1529233300451717 SIMPSON ST133.836.78 $ 4,921.16 $ long sideMARGARET D COUNTRYMAN1717 Simpson StFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6257 1529233300461718 ARONA ST133.836.78 $ 4,921.16 $ long sideDONALD E WINGECARMEN E FLANIGAN1718 Arona StFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6248 1529233300731715 ARONA ST13336.78 $ 4,891.74 $ NANCY S OSMON TRPATRICIA A OSMAN TR1233 N Gulfstream Ave Apt 403Sarasota FL 34236 ‐8954 1529233300741539 CRAWFORD AVE133.836.78 $ 4,921.16 $ SCOTT D NOBLEWENDY R NOBLE1539 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6255 1529233300981717 ASBURY ST036.78 $ ‐$ short side ‐ 78.8 on Crawford; long side ‐ 95 on AsburyPAUL P FAUSTJOY L FAUST1717 Asbury StFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6249 1529233300991720 SNELLING DR036.78 $ ‐$ short side ‐ 78.8 on Crawford; long side ‐ 115 on AsburyKATHLEEN S CLEMONS1720 Snelling DrFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐5734 1529233301091522 CRAWFORD AVE159.0436.78 $ 5,849.49 $ long side on AronaJOHN M PATTON1522 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6254 1529233301101526 CRAWFORD AVE5036.78 $ 1,839.00 $ GEORGE T PASEKJEANETTE M PASEK1526 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6254 1529233301111532 CRAWFORD AVE5036.78 $ 1,839.00 $ VIRGINIA A BLASE1532 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6254 1529233301121538 CRAWFORD AVE5036.78 $ 1,839.00 $ VALERIE A RUTHSTACY A RUTH1538 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6254 1529233301131540 CRAWFORD AVE5036.78 $ 1,839.00 $ THOMAS DETERSLILLIAM DETERS1540 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6254 1529233301141546 CRAWFORD AVE6036.78 $ 2,206.80 $ GEORGE PECKCYNTHIA PECK1546 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6254 1529233301151516 CRAWFORD AVE159.0636.78 $ 5,850.23 $ long side on AronaDAN F GREWEALISA R L GREWE1516 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6251 1529233301161510 CRAWFORD AVE5436.78 $ 1,986.12 $ DONALD E SOBANIAJOANNE M SOBANIA1510 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6251 1529233301171506 CRAWFORD AVE5436.78 $ 1,986.12 $ LOUIS D FRENZEL CO TRUSTEESVIRGINA C FRENZEL CO TRUSTEES1506 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6251 1529233301181504 CRAWFORD AVE5436.78 $ 1,986.12 $ ANTHONY T VON RUDENSARAH A R VON RUDEN1504 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6251 1529233301191496 CRAWFORD AVE5436.78 $ 1,986.12 $ PAMELA M WAITE1496 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6251 1529233301201488 CRAWFORD AVE5436.78 $ 1,986.12 $ VIRGINIA E CARPENTEREVAJANE KOEPER1505 Black Oaks Ln NPlymouth MN 55447 ‐2856 2129231100041583 HOLLYWOOD CT036.78 $ ‐$ short side ‐ 76.52 on Hollywood; long side ‐ 125 on Snelling Svc DrNATHAN D WIERZBAIRINA A RIVAS LOPEZ1583 Hollywood CtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130 2129231100051589 HOLLYWOOD CT6636.78 $ 2,427.48 $ ROGER G AIKENCONNIE L AIKEN1589 Hollywood CtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130 2129231100061597 HOLLYWOOD CT61.636.78 $ 2,265.65 $ FAROOK Z MEAHHAFSA F MEAH1597 Hollywood CtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130 2129231100071603 HOLLYWOOD CT61.636.78 $ 2,265.65 $ JUDITH E BALDWIN1603 Hollywood CtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130 2129231100081607 HOLLYWOOD CT5636.78 $ 2,059.68 $ VALETTA M GYURCI TRUSTEEVALETTA M GYURCI1607 Hollywood CtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130 2129231100091611 HOLLYWOOD CT67.336.78 $ 2,475.29 $ DALE J GENGLERIRENE M GENGLER1611 Hollywood CtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130 2129231100101617 HOLLYWOOD CT61.536.78 $ 2,261.97 $ JUDITH A BAILEYJUDITH A BAILEY TRUSTEE1617 Hollywood CtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130 2129231100111625 HOLLYWOOD CT6136.78 $ 2,243.58 $ THANG NGUYEN1625 Hollywood CourtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130 2129231100121627 HOLLYWOOD CT7536.78 $ 2,758.50 $ MARK L HARRINGTONJULIE A JANNIS1627 Hollywood CtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130 2129231100131630 HOLLYWOOD CT7336.78 $ 2,684.94 $ WILLIAM K SCHULTZ TRUSTEEPo Box 131792Saint Paul MN 55113 ‐0020 2129231100141624 HOLLYWOOD CT6536.78 $ 2,390.70 $ ROBERT J SKUNDBERGMOONEEN E SKUNDBERG1624 Hollywood CtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130 2129231100151618 HOLLYWOOD CT6536.78 $ 2,390.70 $ BEVERLY L CLARKINMARGARET A CLARKIN1618 Hollywood CtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130 2129231100161612 HOLLYWOOD CT6536.78 $ 2,390.70 $ PATRICK A HAWKINSMICHELE S HAWKINS1612 Hollywood CtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130
2013 Pavement Management Project Falcon Heightscommercial/multi unit rate:55.17 $ Preliminary Assessment Rollresidential rate:36.78 $ Street Improvements Parcel IDPropertyAddress Assessable footage (LF)Assessment rate ($/LF)Proposed Assessment NotesOwner Name 1Owner Name 2Owner Street AddressOwner City/State/Zip 2129231100171608 HOLLYWOOD CT5536.78 $ 2,022.90 $ NINA T FAN1608 Hollywood CtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130 2129231100181604 HOLLYWOOD CT5536.78 $ 2,022.90 $ SUSAN S MEYERS1604 Hollywood CtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130 2129231100191598 HOLLYWOOD CT5536.78 $ 2,022.90 $ FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE COR400 National Way Stop Sv74Simi Valley CA 93065 ‐6414 2129231100201590 HOLLYWOOD CT5536.78 $ 2,022.90 $ NAVEED MOHAMMED1590 Hollywood CtFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2130 2129231100211582 HOLLYWOOD CT036.78 $ ‐$ short side ‐ 98.53 on Hollywood; long side ‐ 125 on Snelling Svc DrTHOMAS M HONHEMLOCK GARAGE110 4th St EDuluth MN 55805 ‐1731 2229232100101396 LARPENTEUR AVE W120.8236.78 $ 4,443.76 $ long sideANNETTE G NOVAKANNETTE G NOVAK TRUSTEE1396 Larpenteur Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6301 2229232100111395 CALIFORNIA AVE W120.8136.78 $ 4,443.39 $ long sideSTEVE THOMPSONCAROL THOMPSON1395 California AveFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2102 2229232100221402 LARPENTEUR AVE W120.8236.78 $ 4,443.76 $ long sideJOSEPH KUNKELPo Box 8101Saint Paul MN 55108 ‐0101 2229232100321456 LARPENTEUR AVE W120.8936.78 $ 4,446.33 $ long sideDORIS L UTKEROBERT UTKE1456 Larpenteur Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6303 2229232100331457 CALIFORNIA AVE W120.8836.78 $ 4,445.97 $ long sideDAVID B SMITHCOLLEEN M SMITH1457 California Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2103 2229232100441403 CALIFORNIA AVE W120.8236.78 $ 4,443.76 $ long sideRENNETTE E ARNEMAN1403 California Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2103 2229232100451402 CALIFORNIA AVE W120.8236.78 $ 4,443.76 $ long sideJOHN R LUEYCHRISTINA M LUEY1402 California Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2104 2229232100561456 CALIFORNIA AVE W120.8836.78 $ 4,445.97 $ long sideKATHRYN J FRAHM1456 California AveFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2104 2229232100571457 IDAHO AVE W120.8836.78 $ 4,445.97 $ long sideDAVID S GORRINGEGRACE M GORRINGE1457 Idaho Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2114 2229232100681403 IDAHO AVE W120.8136.78 $ 4,443.39 $ long sidePETER WILLIAMSAMY WILLIAMS1403 Idaho Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2114 2229232100791396 CALIFORNIA AVE W120.8136.78 $ 4,443.39 $ long sideMICHAEL R BLACKCAROLYN INDIA BLACK1396 California Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2101 2229232100801395 IDAHO AVE W120.8136.78 $ 4,443.39 $ long sideWILLIAM B KELMBARBARA J ANDERSEN1395 Idaho Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2113 2229232101011396 IDAHO AVE W125.6936.78 $ 4,622.88 $ long sideSHIRLEY ANN DINGMAN1396 Idaho Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2112 2229232101021395 IOWA AVE W125.6936.78 $ 4,622.88 $ long sideBRUCE H LEPPINKJULIE A LEPPINK1395 Iowa Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2122 2229232101131402 IDAHO AVE W125.736.78 $ 4,623.25 $ long sideSTEVEN H MOORELORI W MOORE1402 Idaho Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2115 2229232101241456 IDAHO AVE W125.7636.78 $ 4,625.45 $ long sideMARIE A FURTONDARLENE MCMINN1456 Idaho Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2115 2229232101251457 IOWA AVE W125.7536.78 $ 4,625.09 $ long sideMATTHEW O SHAUGHNESSYGILLIAN O SHAUGHNESSY1457 Iowa Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2123 2229232101361403 IOWA AVE W125.6936.78 $ 4,622.88 $ long sideWILLIAM R MCGUIGANTHELMA S MCGUIGAN1403 Iowa Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2123 2229232101371402 IOWA AVE W125.736.78 $ 4,623.25 $ long sideFREDERICK J MASKECAROL J MASKE TRUSTEE1402 Iowa Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2124 2229232101481456 IOWA AVE W125.7636.78 $ 4,625.45 $ long sideMICHAEL A SHERWOODBRONWYN B SHERWOOD1456 Iowa Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2124 2229232101491457 HOYT AVE W125.7536.78 $ 4,625.09 $ long sideTIMOTHY L CARBONNEAUCAROL R CARBONNEAU1457 Hoyt Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2111 2229232101601403 HOYT AVE W125.6936.78 $ 4,622.88 $ long sidePHILIP A BEHRENSJILL D SCHUBBE1403 Hoyt Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2111 2229232101711394 IOWA AVE W125.6936.78 $ 4,622.88 $ long sideSTEPHEN A HECHTSTACEY H HECHT1394 Iowa Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2121 2229232101721397 HOYT AVE W125.6936.78 $ 4,622.88 $ long sideJAY M LANDINLESLEY A LANDIN1397 Hoyt Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2110 2229232200081513 CALIFORNIA AVE W12036.78 $ 4,413.60 $ long sideCARRIE J MARTINSON 2000 IR TR1513 California WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2106 2229232200191463 CALIFORNIA AVE W12036.78 $ 4,413.60 $ long sideAMY J SELBY1463 California Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2106 2229232200201464 CALIFORNIA AVE W12036.78 $ 4,413.60 $ long sideJOHN R LANDYBRENDA J LANDY TRUSTEE1464 California Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2105 2229232200301512 CALIFORNIA AVE W12036.78 $ 4,413.60 $ long sideF WILLIAM FRITSCHE1512 California Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2105 2229232200311511 IDAHO AVE W12036.78 $ 4,413.60 $ long sideKENT O PAULSONJOAN E PAULSON1511 Idaho Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2117 2229232200401463 IDAHO AVE W12036.78 $ 4,413.60 $ long sideKATHLEEN J STANTON1463 Idaho Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2117 2229232200521525 IDAHO AVE W12036.78 $ 4,413.60 $ long sideJUDITH A CONNOLLY1525 Idaho Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2118 2229232200621464 IDAHO AVE W124.7436.78 $ 4,587.94 $ long sideWILLIAM DONALD MOSIER1464 Idaho Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2116 2229232200721512 IDAHO AVE W124.6636.78 $ 4,584.99 $ long sideHARRIET BALIAN1512 Idaho Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2116 2229232200731513 IOWA AVE W124.6636.78 $ 4,584.99 $ long sideHANS BRINK1513 Iowa StFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2126 2229232200841463 IOWA AVE W124.7436.78 $ 4,587.94 $ long sideKENT S MCCOYANGELA M MCCOY1463 Iowa Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2126 2229232201041523 HOYT AVE W124.6536.78 $ 4,584.63 $ long sideAPRIL J ANDERSONBRIAN J ANDERSON1523 Hoyt Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2133 2229232201051524 IOWA AVE W124.6536.78 $ 4,584.63 $ long sideJAMES A LEE1524 Iowa Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2127 2229232201101464 IOWA AVE W124.7436.78 $ 4,587.94 $ long sideROBERT S TOMLINSONRANDI C TOMLINSON1464 Iowa Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2125 2229232201201512 IOWA AVE W124.6636.78 $ 4,584.99 $ long sidePATRICIA L RHEIN1512 Iowa Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2125 2229232201211513 HOYT AVE W124.6636.78 $ 4,584.99 $ long sidePEGGY L BRITTON1513 Hoyt Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2132 2229232201321463 HOYT AVE W124.7436.78 $ 4,587.94 $ long sideRYAN HOLTONMATTHEW HOLTON1463 Hoyt Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2132 2229232201331522 IDAHO AVE W134.6536.78 $ 4,952.43 $ long sideJOHN S KILBRIDEKARIS A KILBRIDE1522 Idaho Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2119 2229232201421525 IOWA AVE W134.6536.78 $ 4,952.43 $ long sideHERBERT RICHARDSFLORENCE RICHARDS1525 Iowa Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2128 subtotal footage 7695.31 total footage 9227.34
2013 Pavement Management Project Falcon HeightsCommercial Rate Falcon Crossing alley73.29 $ bituminous115.78 $ concrete Preliminary Assessment RollResidential Rate Falcon Crossing alley10.76 $ Alley ImprovementsCommercial Rate Super America alley40.47 $ Residential Rate Super America alley36.32 $ Parcel IDPropertyAddress Assessable footage (LF) Assessment rate ($/LF) Assessment Assessment rate ($/LF)‐ concrete Assessment ‐ concrete NotesOwner Name 1Owner Name 2Owner Street AddressOwner City/State/Zip COMMERCIAL 1529233301361533 LARPENTEUR AVE W485.6973.29 $ 35,596.22 $ 115.78 $ 56,233.19 $ Length along south side of alleyFALCON CROSSING LLCCO WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT1625 Energy Park Dr Ste 100St Paul MN 55108 ‐2703 1529233301400 SNELLING AVE N (1533)170.373.29 $ 12,481.29 $ 115.78 $ 19,717.33 $ Length along north side of alley FALCON CROSSING LLCWELLINGTON MANAGEMENT INC1625 Energy Park Drive Ste 100St Paul MN 55108 ‐2703 subtotal footage 655.99 RESIDENTIAL 1529233301091522 CRAWFORD AVE51.7810.76 $ 557.15 $ alley side, corner lotJOHN M PATTON1522 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6254 1529233301101526 CRAWFORD AVE5010.76 $ 538.00 $ GEORGE T PASEKJEANETTE M PASEK1526 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6254 1529233301111532 CRAWFORD AVE5010.76 $ 538.00 $ VIRGINIA A BLASE1532 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6254 1529233301121538 CRAWFORD AVE5010.76 $ 538.00 $ VALERIE A RUTHSTACY A RUTH1538 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6254 1529233301131540 CRAWFORD AVE5010.76 $ 538.00 $ THOMAS DETERSLILLIAM DETERS1540 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6254 1529233301141546 CRAWFORD AVE6010.76 $ 645.60 $ GEORGE PECKCYNTHIA PECK1546 Crawford AveFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6254 subtotal footage 311.78 COMMERCIAL 2229232100011350 LARPENTEUR AVE W13640.47 $ 5,503.92 $ Super AmericaREALTY INCOME PROPERTIES 3 LLC600 La Terraza BlvdEscondido CA 92025 ‐3873 subtotal footage 136 RESIDENTIAL 2229232100021354 LARPENTEUR AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ MARGARET E CLEMMENTMARGARET E CLEMMENT TRUSTEE1354 Larpenteur Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6301 2229232100031358 LARPENTEUR AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ STEVEN J NAVA1358 Larpenteur Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6301 2229232100041362 LARPENTEUR AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ JANET D JACOBSON1362 Larpenteur Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6301 2229232100051368 LARPENTEUR AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ LAURIE JACHYMOWSKI1368 Larpenteur Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6301 2229232100061372 LARPENTEUR AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ JILL S COPELAND5235 East Oak Point DrPrior Lake MN 55372 ‐3474 2229232100071376 LARPENTEUR AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ RAJU KARMACHARYAMATHURA KARMACHARYA1121 Shryer Ave WRoseville MN 55113 ‐5933 2229232100081382 LARPENTEUR AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ RICHARD R FEECAROL T FEE1382 Larpenteur Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6301 2229232100091386 LARPENTEUR AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ MARY K OLSON1386 Larpenteur Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6301 2229232100101396 LARPENTEUR AVE W56.4336.32 $ 2,049.54 $ ANNETTE G NOVAKANNETTE G NOVAK TRUSTEE1396 Larpenteur Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55113 ‐6301 2229232100111395 CALIFORNIA AVE W55.8536.32 $ 2,028.47 $ STEVE THOMPSONCAROL THOMPSON1395 California AveFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2102 2229232100121391 CALIFORNIA AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ SCOTT HAFNERMEGAN HAFNER1391 California Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2102 2229232100131387 CALIFORNIA AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ EDWARD C JOHNSONSYLVIA R JOHNSON1387 California Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2102 2229232100141381 CALIFORNIA AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ KIMBERLY SCHUDYJAMES ALLARD1381 California Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2102 2229232100151375 CALIFORNIA AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ LISA S SCHILTGEN1375 California Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2102 2229232100161367 CALIFORNIA AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ MARK J BLYIkaroslaan 19 1930 ZaventemSt Paul 55108 ‐2102 Belgium 2229232100171365 CALIFORNIA AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ CHARLES R OJALABARBARA B OJALA1365 California Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2102 2229232100181361 CALIFORNIA AVE W5036.32 $ 1,816.00 $ KIM S HWANG1361 California A Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2102 2229232100191357 CALIFORNIA AVE W5936.32 $ 2,142.88 $ JOHN A REMINGTONJACQUELINE A REMINGTON1357 California Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2102 2229232100201349 CALIFORNIA AVE W6436.32 $ 2,324.48 $ BEATRICE J ROY1349 California Ave WFalcon Heights MN 55108 ‐2102 2229232100211345 CALIFORNIA AVE W6336.32 $ 2,288.16 $ MARVIN S DEMARTINOJOYCE E DEMARTINO1345 California Ave NSt Paul MN 55108 ‐2102 subtotal footage 1048.28
2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report 28 Exhibit D: Soil Boring Logs
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS COUNCIL RESOLUTION December 12 , 2012 No. 12 -18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE 20 13 PAVEMENT M ANAGEMENT PRO JECT FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING PUBLIC HEARING FOR IMPROVEM ENT WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Council adopted October 12, 2011 and August 8, 2012, a report has been prepared by the City Engineer with reference to the improvement of the following streets: • Arona Street, from Crawford Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue • Crawford Avenue, from Snelling Avenue to Simpson Street • Hollywood Court , from Snelling Avenue Frontage Road to alleys • Alley between Larpenteur Ave nue and California Ave nu e , from Albert St reet to Hamline Ave nue • Alley between Larpenteur Avenue and Crawford Avenue, from Snelling Avenue to Arona Street • Albert Street, from Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue • Pascal Street, from Hoyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue • Arona Street, from H oyt Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue • East Snelling Avenue Service Drive, Idaho Avenue to dead end and this report was received by the Council on December 12, 2012 , and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessa ry, cost effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments f or affected parcels. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota: 1. The council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a po rtion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $1,227,149.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 9 th day of January , 201 3 in the council ch ambers of the city hall at 7:00 p .m. and the City Administrator shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moved by: Approved by: ________________________ Peter Lindstrom, Mayor December 12 , 2012 LINDSTROM ____ In Favor Attested by: ________________________ GOSLINE Bart Fischer HARRIS ____ Against City Administrator LONG December 12 , 2012 MERCER -TAYLOR
REQUEST FOR COUN CIL ACTION Families, Fields and Fair __________________________ The City That Soars! Item Budget A mendment of T ransfer to General Fund from Sanitary Sewer Fund Description In prior years , the transfer from the s ani tary s ewer f und to the g eneral f und in support of the general operating budget was completed at the end of the year. In 201 2 this transfer was made at the beginning of the year to increase the investment income allocated to the g eneral f und through out th e year . It is too early to determine if there will be any unused portion of the original transfer, but if there is , staff requests the authority to transfer any excess back to the sanitary sewer fund to keep the fund balance of the g eneral f und approxima tely the same percentage of next year’s expenditures as the ending fund balance of December 31, 201 2 . Budget Impact Transfer back an unused portion of the original budgeted transfer from sanitary sewer to the general fund for 201 2 . Att achment(s) NA A ction(s) Requested Staff recommends that a transfer of unused funds of the original budgeted transfer of sanitary sewer funds to the general fund be transferred back at the end of the year to maintain the ending fund balance of the general fund to be appro ximately the same percentage of next year’s expenditu r es as the ending fund balance of December 31, 20 1 2 . Meeting Date December 12, 2012 Agenda Item Consent F11 Attachment Submitted By Roland Olson, Finance Director