HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes for Feb 10MEETING MINUTES
Monday, February 10, 2014 6:30 p.m. City Hall
City of Falcon Heights Parks & Recreation Commission
1. Call to Order
Meeting called to order at 6:36pm. No public comment was offered.
Attendance X=present; AB=absent
X Gordon Strom Chairperson
X Christina Erickson Secretary
X Michelle Tesser Staff Liaison
X Tim Pittman Staff
AB Chuck Long Council Liaison
X Mary Hannon Jacobson
X Dave Thomas
AB Liz Asmus
X Michael Breen
AB Cari Lee
2. Approval of Meeting Minutes
Christina Erickson asked the commission if her appointment of Secretary was approved
by all since no official vote was performed during the January meeting. Mary Hannon
Jacobson confirmed the sole role of the Secretary is to take meeting minutes and
forward to Michelle after compilation. The commission agreed to both of these and the
the January 9, 2014 meeting minutes were approved.
3. Welcome New Commission Leketta Troupe
Michelle Tesser informed the commission that Leketta is unable to make the Park & Rec
commission meeting time/dates and withdrew her application as commissioner.
4. Presentation of Searchability of Laserfiche database
Michelle Tesser reviewed the website with the commission. Clicking on the City
Government\City Commissions\Parks and Recreation Commission menu option displayed
the Park and Rec Commission page where an Archive was specified at the bottom. Clicking
on the “this link” hyperlink in the Archive section brings the user to the Laserfiche WebLink
system.
A hyperlink into the Laserfiche WebLink system can be found on the City Council tab or any
of the City Commision tabs.
Using the Laserfiche WebLink system, a user can search criteria and access information on a
specific topic that has been captured in previous meeting minutes or agendas of Park & Rec
meetings. The Archives go back as far back as minutes/agendas are found in 1987 and are
open to the public. Meeting minutes and agendas are automatically moved into laserfiche
for searchability. Meeting minutes and agendas are also listed by date of the meeting.
5. Update on the Park Improvement Open House and Survey
Michelle Tesser said there were 165 online responses to the Park Improvement Survey that
was on the city website. 20 people attended the open houses. Candace Amberg (Project
Manager & Landscape Architect from WSB) got a lot of feedback and will present WSB’s
findings and recommendations to the Park and Rec Commission at the March 10th meeting.
On March 26th she will present the information to the Falcon Heights City Council.
Gordon Strom requested that the Park & Rec commission see a draft of her findings and
recommendations before the March 10th meeting so that the commissioners have time to
review/absorb the information and come prepared with questions/comments to the March
10th commission meeting. Michelle Tesser said she will ask Candace if this can be provided
and emailed to the commissioners.
6. Recap on Winterfest Event
Michelle Tesser reviewed the Winterfest event held on Sunday, Jan 26th from 1pm-4pm at
Community Park. The activities (animals, snowshoeing, ice skating and the hayride) all had
participants. However, the weather was very cold and played a factor in the lower turnout
than usual – too cold for outside activity. The Medallion was found in the usual amount of
time, 1.5 hours .
Gordon Strom asked how do we determine plans for future years and is the event evaluated
for future improvements or consideration. Michelle recaps that the City Council strongly
supports the Winterfest event as a community builder and budgets are built knowing some
events may not be as successful some years as they were in previous.
7. Presentation on 2013 Budget and Rec Data Analysis
Michelle Tesser presented a Powerpoint review of the budget and analysis data
(*attached*). Connected to budget, as revenue in rec programs has increased over the
years. Michelle explained the budget on specific activities in relation to costs to provide the
program versus revenue made.
Comments made during open discussion:
Gordon Strom asked: Will there ever be a maximum reached on ability to offer
programs? Michelle stated that we are reaching that maximum now (with 101
programs in 2013.)
Lauderdale residents are charged a resident rate per our agreement with them.
Question was asked why there were not more winter programs. Michelle replied
that it is hard to have winter programs as there are no staff that time of year to run
them and Michelle’s other administrative duties become very busy with license and
permit renewals
Families like Falcon Heights Park & Rec summer offerings for the younger kids.
Revenues are excellent..
Draw from other cities has increased, though Michelle has not done advertising
differently.
What happens if we go over budget? There is a parachute system built in, programs
do not have to be dropped.
Budget for supplies and material are very low. Most of the budget goes for staff
salaries. Also costs for specialty instructors. The city earns 20% on specialty
instructors.
The extra revenue earned over the past years are transferred into the general funds.
They are not maintained in a fund for Parks & Rec.
Tim Pittman discussed facilities and grounds maintenance and estimated how much he will
spend on maintenance at Curtiss, Grove and Community Parks in 2014. This cost in 2013
was $5,354. This covers things like grass seed, paint, repairs, etc. Tim showed the 5 year
capital requests for improvements to parks = $126,000 would be needed in the next 5 years
$140,000 was given by park dedication from Hermes, but that will be spent quickly.
Park & Rec commission will need to think of a way to get funding back into the budget for
park improvements and maintenance. Roseville had to have a referendum to gather
enough funds for their recent park improvements. The park improvement study being
performed by Candace and her team at WSB will outline options and suggestions regarding
funding.
8. Public Works Report
Tim Pittman discussed public works. He said plowing is going well, with his staff is doing
most of the plowing (as opposed to contracting it out to Ramsey County). The county was
called recently to plow (such as weekends when his staff is not always available) but not
often. Falcon Heights can pay Ramsey County to plow but it is more cost effective and
cheaper to do it ourselves. Tim was considering purchasing another plow and not contract
to Ramsey County anymore but he is holding off on that decision because of the small size
of his staff (3 person crew includes himself) and their availability. As it works now, Ramsey
County calls us to see if we need the plowing, and we try to save the dollars by doing the
plowing ourselves.
Question was asked: When does the work in Curtiss Field begin (to resolve
drainage/flooding issue)? Tim said September 2014. Part of the outcome of the WSB Park
Improvement study will be what changes/improvements will be made to Curtiss Field Park
so nothing can be done until that study is presented to the city (currently scheduled for
March 26th) and decisions are made by the City Council.
Dave Thomas asked if the pond will be removed. Tim replied that the pond will stay but
structurally they will manage the piping to prevent flooding of the park (the pond will
always have standing water). Fencing will be installed around the pond. Landscaping
options will be in the Park Improvement Study from WSB.
9. 2014 Recreation Programs
I believe this agenda item was skipped due to time constraints.
10. FHE Site Construction
Michelle was notified via email by Kirstine Rossow of the Roseville School District that
Falcon Heights Elementary school may be undergoing expansion construction this summer
(2014). Therefore, there is a strong likelihood that the Falcon Heights space (school
playground/park) will NOT be available for summer park & rec programming. The
construction has not been approved yet but Michelle is looking into other venue options
(such as Lauderdale park.) See *attached* email.
11. Recap of meeting with Potential Sponsor – Spire
Michelle met with Spire in January, Spire agreed to sponsor $650 for Movie in the Park this summer
which covers the rental equipment. Spire is also interested in providing $150 towards the Falcon
Heights/Lauderdale 5k fun run in September.
12. Andy Hovland’s memo to Commissioners on tree update
Andy Hovland was unable to attend the meeting so he sent the (*attached*) email updating
the commission on his tree plan. Mary Hannon Jacobson discussed a conversation she had
with Rainbow Treecare who treats her residential Ash tree. According to Rainbow, chemical
treatments used against EAB (Emerald Ash Borer) are now nationally recognized by the
industry as proven, recommended and warrantied treatments against EAB. In light of this,
Mary was curious if Andy Hovland would support the use of chemical treatments for any
healthy Ash trees in Community park whose preservation would be beneficial to the park
until new trees that are/will be planted are established. Mary requested that Andy Hovland
communicate his viewpoint on the use of chemical treatments for healthy Ash in our parks.
Tesser discussed that Andy will present in front of the council during his usual yearly update
in the next couple of months. Chuck Long, Council Liaison to the Parks and Recreation
Commission can ask this question at that time.** NO DECISIONS WERE MADE **
The Question was also asked about timelines for the Master Tree Plan. Michelle said Andy is
not working on a Master Tree Plan for Falcon Heights Parks. Instead he is addressing the
trees in Community, Grove and Curtiss Field Parks and the Cleveland and Larpenteur
boulevards, but no Master Tree Plan is being developed for the park at this time.
13. New Business
a. Summary of previous EAB decisions
Chuck Long sent an email (*attached*) summarizing the background of previous
discussions/decisions regarding chemical treatment of EAB (Emerald Ash Borer) by
Andy Hovland and the City Council.
b. Onboarding New Commissioners
Mary Hannon Jacobson requested that the process for onboarding new Park & Rec
commissioners be reviewed and modified. She talked with Roseville Park & Rec who
gives their new commissioners a binder of information about current projects for
them to review and familiarize themselves with before their first meeting so they
can come to the meetings prepared. Mary believes this would make those meetings
more efficient/effective and give new commissioners a tool to help contribute to
the meetings immediately. Dave Thomas recommended writing up a 1 page
document for new commissioners outlining current projects each time a new
commissioner comes on board. Mary Hannon Jacobson recommended using the
Laserfiche WebLink system to combine information from various meetings to create
a summary of current projects. The question was asked how often Park & Rec has
commission turnover. Mary said she has been on the commission nearly 1 year and
many new commissioners have joined. Michelle said the commissions are usually
not like this (so many new members.)
*NO DECISIONS WERE MADE *
14. Meeting Conclusion
Michelle confirmed this was her last meeting before her maternity leave. The next meeting
is scheduled for Monday, March 10th where the commission will meet with Candace
Amberg (WSB) to review WSB’s Park Improvement study findings and recommendations.
The meeting adjourned at 8:00pm.
a. Summary of Decisions Made
i. Christina Erickson is Secretary of the Park & Rec Commission. The sole
purpose of the secretary position is to take meeting minutes and forward
to Michelle Tesser for review/forward to commissioners.
b. Summary of Action Items
i. Michelle Tesser will contact Candace Amberg (WSB) to request a draft
of the WSB findings/recommendation for the Park & Rec commissions
review before March 10, 2014
c. Documents to Attach/PDF with these Meeting Minutes
i. Powerpoint Presentation of 2013 Budget and Rec Data Analysis
ii. Email from Kristine Rossow re: unavailability of Falcon Heights
Elementary park/playground for Park & Rec programming
iii. Andy Hovland’s memo to Commissioners on tree update
iv. Email from Chuck Long regarding EAB discussion history
d. Incomplete Decisions which should be included on March Agenda
i. Mary Hannon Jacobson requested that Andy Hovland communicate his
viewpoint on the use of chemical treatments for healthy Ash in our
parks. Chuck Long’s email states “We can ask whether there have been
any improvements into the reliability of the chemical treatments.” Will
this request of Andy be made or should we wait/ask until our next
meeting with him?
ii. Onboarding new commissioners – should we modify this process?
Tesser requested this item not be discussed until her return from
maternity leave since this adds to her duties.
Community Park
One of my concerns is trying to improve the safety of the trees in the playground area. Thankfully, there
are several non‐ash species in this area which I think we should preserve as we will be losing so many
trees in the north end of the park as they are mostly ash. I recommend hazard reduction pruning in the
non‐ash tree species, as well as cabling these trees where weak branch attachments are evident. We
have begun to replant in several areas on the edges of the playground and basketball court. My goal is
to continue this process, removing additional ash and replanting new tree stock. A bulk of my efforts
going forward will be removing and replacing the ash on the south side of the parking lot, many of which
are in decline. The trees do not provide much shade at this point given their state. I recommend removal
and replacement of all these ash. I would also like to plant plenty of trees on the north side of the
parking along Roselawn. Cars parked on both sides of the parking lot would then benefit from the shade
these trees will eventually cast. Much of Community Park is recreational space and we need to leave
open space for these activities. Any additional planting would be on the edges of these spaces or along
the walking path in the park. Safety is always a concern and keeping open sight lines is important,
especially in areas further from the road. Strategic plantings along the walking path will provide shade
for park visitors, while still accounting for safety and the mixed use nature of this park.
Curtiss Field
Any planning put into Curtiss Field hinges on the results of the hydrological study. Residents have
requested additional trees planted around the playground area for shade as well as new plantings along
Snelling. We have had a lot of tree loss along Snelling, partly due to salt over spray from the road and
poor tree selection as well as drought conditions over the last 5 years. The Poplar plantings near the
gazebo at the north end of the park are problematic due to the tendency of these trees to root sucker,
which can obscure the view into the gazebo. This situation was addressed several years ago, but will
most likely need to be addressed again. I would be happy to discuss plantings at this park further once I
have seen the results of the hydrological study.
Grove Park
Several trees came down in summer storms this past year. One was an ash adjacent to the fire lane for
1666 Coffman, which I suggest we do not replant as the space was over crowded already with tree
stock. The other tree was along Coffman, which I suggest we replant this spring. Also, we lost a white
pine several years ago at the southwest end of the park along the walking path. It would be nice to
establish something in this space, as it provides a visual buffer between the park and the private
residences behind it.
Cleveland
Cleveland median was replanted this past September with Princeton Elm. Public works assisted in
watering these trees during dry periods last fall to aid in establishment. This spring we will remulch the
beds and adjust the stakes as needed. The trees will continue to be watered this season if we enter
another dry spell.
Larpenteur
I will be reviewing the original plans this spring and discussing maintenance strategies and replanting
scenarios with Bart and Tim.
20
1
3
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
R
e
v
i
e
w
Mi
c
h
e
l
l
e
T
e
s
s
e
r
20
0
0
-
2
0
1
0
C
EN
S
U
S
C OM
P
A
R
A
B
L
E
S
0
20
0
40
0
60
0
20
0
0
20
1
0
42
3
33
0
35
1
30
2
27
1
26
1
10
-
1
4
y
r
s
5-
9
y
r
s
Un
d
e
r
5
20
1
3
N
UM
B
E
R
O
F
P AR
T
I
C
I
P
A
N
T
S
No
n
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
:
5
0
6
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
:
3
6
4
To
t
a
l
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
:
8
7
0
N UM
B
E
R
O
F
P AR
T
I
C
I
P
A
N
T
S
20
0
1
-
2
0
1
3
0
10
0
20
0
30
0
40
0
50
0
60
0
20
0
1
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
3
2
0
0
4
2
0
0
5
2
0
0
6
2
0
0
7
2
0
0
8
2
0
0
9
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
73
12
3
13
9
15
1
15
0
11
4
16
9
14
0
17
4
27
4
33
0
41
0
50
6
11
1
15
2
10
5
14
5
14
1
14
0
18
6
14
7
21
0
22
7
25
1
24
5
36
4
Non Resident Resident
20
0
4
-
2
0
1
3
A
CT
U
A
L
R EV
E
N
U
E
S
$5
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$5
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$7
,
8
6
5
.
0
0
$1
2
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
1
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$1
5
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$1
2
,
5
9
8
.
0
0
$1
0
,
0
7
3
.
0
0
$1
3
,
7
1
0
.
0
0
$1
8
,
0
3
6
.
5
0
$6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$4
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$8
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$9
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$1
4
,
3
0
2
.
0
0
$2
2
,
6
2
9
.
0
0
$2
1
,
2
8
3
.
0
0
$2
4
,
0
4
9
.
5
0
$0
.
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
20
0
4
2
0
0
5
2
0
0
6
2
0
0
7
2
0
0
8
2
0
0
9
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
Resident Non Resident
20
0
4
-
2
0
1
3
R
EV
E
N
U
E
S
Ye
a
r
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
N
o
n
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
T
o
t
a
l
20
0
4
$
5
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
1
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
20
0
5
$
5
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
20
0
6
$
7
,
8
6
5
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
,
8
6
5
.
0
0
20
0
7
$
1
2
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
0
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
20
0
8
$
1
1
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
0
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
20
0
9
$
1
5
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
4
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
20
1
0
$
1
2
,
5
9
8
.
0
0
$
1
4
,
3
0
2
.
0
0
$
2
6
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
20
1
1
$
1
0
,
0
7
3
.
0
0
$
2
2
,
6
2
9
.
0
0
$
3
2
,
9
5
2
.
0
0
20
1
2
$
1
3
,
7
1
0
.
0
0
$
2
1
,
2
8
3
.
0
0
$
3
4
,
9
9
3
.
0
0
20
1
3
$
1
8
,
0
3
6
.
5
0
$
2
4
,
0
4
9
.
5
0
$
4
2
,
0
8
6
.
0
0
P ER
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
O
F
P RO
F
I
T
S
O
N
R EC
P RO
G
R
A
M
S
20
1
3
20
1
2
20
1
1
27
%
1
8
%
1
9
%
0
50
0
10
0
0
15
0
0
20
0
0
25
0
0
20
1
3
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
1
Ye
a
r
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
I ND
I
V
I
D
U
A
L
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
S
O
F
F
E
R
E
D
20
0
9
-
2
0
1
3
51
61
77
87
10
1
020406080
10
0
12
0
20
0
9
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
To
t
a
l
In
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
To
t
a
l
In
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
Programs
C IT
I
E
S
P AR
T
I
C
I
P
A
N
T
S
20
1
3
Ar
d
e
n
Hi
l
l
s
,
7
22
2
Fa
l
c
o
n
He
i
g
h
t
s
,
28
1
La
u
d
e
r
d
a
l
e
,
58
2
3Mi
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
,
36
Ne
w
Br
i
g
h
t
o
n
,
7 11
Ro
s
e
v
i
l
l
e
,
26
8
Sh
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
,
9
St
.
Pa
u
l
an
d
St
.
Anthony,
19
0
1
050
10
0
15
0
20
0
25
0
30
0
To
t
a
l
Ar
d
e
n
Hi
l
l
s
Bl
a
i
n
e
Br
o
o
k
l
y
n
Pa
r
k
Co
l
u
m
b
i
a
He
i
g
h
t
s
Fa
l
c
o
n
He
i
g
h
t
s
La
u
d
e
r
d
a
l
e
Li
t
t
l
e
Ca
n
a
d
a
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
Mi
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
Ne
w
Br
i
g
h
t
o
n
No
r
t
h
Oa
k
s
Or
o
n
o
Ro
s
e
v
i
l
l
e
Sh
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
St
.
Pa
u
l
an
d
St
.
An
t
h
o
n
y
(b
l
a
n
k
)
L AU
D
E
R
D
A
L
E
P AR
T
I
C
I
P
A
N
T
S
26
L
a
u
d
e
r
d
a
l
e
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
Re
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
f
o
r
5
3
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
To
t
a
l
S
p
e
n
t
$
3
,
1
4
2
To
t
a
l
A
m
o
u
n
t
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
f
r
o
m
L
a
u
d
e
r
d
a
l
e
p
e
r
an
n
u
a
l
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
:
$
3
6
4
.
0
0
20
1
1
-
2
0
1
3
C
IT
I
E
S
P AR
T
I
C
I
P
A
N
T
S
3
22
9
22
9
8
17
5
7
11
6
6
17
9
59
3
12
5
20
7
6
17
1
7
28
1
58
36
7
26
8
9
19
0
050
10
0
15
0
20
0
25
0
30
0
Ar
d
e
n
Hi
l
l
s
F
a
l
c
o
n
He
i
g
h
t
s
La
u
d
e
r
d
a
l
e
M
a
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
M
i
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
N
e
w
Br
i
g
h
t
o
n
R
o
s
e
v
i
l
l
e
S
h
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
S
t
.
Pa
u
l
2011 2012 2013
N UM
B
E
R
O
F
R ET
U
R
N
E
R
S
Ye
a
r
R
e
t
u
r
n
e
r
s
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
20
1
1
-
2
0
1
2
1
1
7
5
8
1
20
1
2
-
2
0
1
3
1
3
2
6
5
5
20
1
1
-
2
0
1
3
7
2
8
7
0
N UM
B
E
R
O
F
P AR
T
I
C
I
P
A
N
T
S
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
I
N
G
FO
R
M
O
R
E
T
H
A
N
1
CL
A
S
S
A
Y
E
A
R
Ye
a
r
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
M
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
1
a
y
e
a
r
20
1
1
5
8
1
1
0
7
20
1
2
6
5
5
1
0
3
20
1
3
8
7
0
1
5
3
20
1
3
C
ON
T
R
A
C
T
E
D
P RO
G
R
A
M
R EV
E
N
U
E
$8
1
0
.
7
5
$1
,
2
4
0
.
2
0
$1
,
9
1
0
.
0
0
$3
8
6
.
0
0
$1
,
1
9
3
.
0
0
$1
,
2
0
2
.
4
0
$‐
$5
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
20
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
TKD Yoga
20
1
1
P
OP
U
L
A
R
A GE
S
0102030405060
1
2
2
.
5
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
3
3
0
4
0
4
2
4
5
A
d
u
l
t
0
.
8
20
1
1
Ag
e
Ch
a
r
t
Non Resident Resident
20
1
2
P
OP
U
L
A
R
A GE
S
01020304050607080
20
1
2
Ag
e
Ch
a
r
t
Non Resident Resident
20
1
3
P
OP
U
L
A
R
A GE
S
0102030405060708090
No
n
Resident
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
N UM
B
E
R
O
F
S CH
O
L
A
R
S
H
I
P
S
Ye
a
r
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
S
c
h
o
l
a
r
s
h
i
p
s
20
1
3
4
0
20
1
2
1
3
20
1
1
1
0
20
1
0
1
0
20
1
3
C
OM
M
U
N
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
M EA
S
U
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
#
o
f
F
a
c
e
b
o
o
k
L
i
k
e
s
Ye
a
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
20
1
3
2
2
5
20
1
2
1
4
2
20
1
1
7
5
#
o
f
T
w
e
e
t
F
o
l
l
o
w
e
r
s
Ye
a
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
20
1
3
4
1
1
20
1
2
3
2
5
20
1
1
2
4
9
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
#
o
f
l
i
s
t
s
e
r
v
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
:
4
5
6