HomeMy WebLinkAboutChicken Ordinance Packet
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Families, Fields and Fair
__________________________
The City That Soars!
Description The Falcon Heights Environment Commission recommends adoption of an
ordinance allowing and regulating the keeping of a limited number of hens in
residential neighborhoods of Falcon Heights.
Background
In 2012 the Falcon Heights Environment Commission took up the topic of back yard
chickens under the principle that growing food locally is a good sustainability
practice. Commissioners met with Bill Stephenson of St. Paul’s Animal Control
department, which manages that city’s chicken permits and inspections, and with
Jane McHattie, a St. Paul resident who keeps chickens. Commissioners studied
chicken ordinances from Stillwater, Maplewood, Minneapolis, Eagan and other
cities. Commissioners used these codes as models to craft an ordinance for Falcon
Heights, drafted by the City Attorney, which was presented to the City Council at
their workshop on March 6.
The proposed ordinance would add Article IV to Chapter 10 Animals, providing
conditions under which residents may keep up to four hens in their back yards, by
permit. The ordinance would amend the Zoning Code, Chapter 113, Sections 113-
174(d) and 113-181(d)(1) to allow as an accessory use for single family and two-
family homes the keeping of chickens as regulated by Chapter 10, Article IV.
A majority of the Council favoring adoption, the proposed ordinance was sent to
the Planning Commission. As the proposed ordinance amends the Zoning Code of
the City, State Statute requires a public hearing and a recommendation by the
Planning Commission.
At the request of Mayor Lindstrom a straw poll was set up on the website to survey
citizens on this matter. At 3:00 p.m. on May 23, the poll stood at 129 in favor of
chickens; 58 opposed. The poll allows only one vote per computer.
Budget Impact Unknown
Attachment(s) Draft ordinance allowing and regulating the keeping of chickens
Map of the Metro area showing chicken ordinance status in cities
Spreadsheet of city ordinances
Action(s)
Requested
Hold a public hearing on the proposed ordinance.
Discuss the proposed ordinance and make a recommendation to the City
Council.
Meeting Date May 28, 2013
Agenda Item 1
Title Chicken Ordinance
Submitted By Deborah Jones, Staff Liaison
Doc. #168232v.1
RNK: 1/7/2013 1
ORDINANCE NO. ____
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 10 AND 113
OF THE FALCON HEIGHTS CITY CODE
CONCERNING CHICKENS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF FALCON HEIGHTS ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 10 of the Falcon Heights City Code is amended by adding Article IV to
read as follows:
ARTICLE IV. CHICKENS
10-34 Keeping of chickens.
A. Any person who keeps chickens in the City must obtain a permit
prior to acquiring the chickens. Chickens may only be kept in zoning
districts where chickens are an allowed accessory use. The initial permit
is valid for up to two (2) years beginning on the date the chickens arrive
on the site and ending on December 31 of the following year. Subsequent
permits are valid from January 1 of one year to December 31 of the second
year. Applications for permits must be made to the Zoning and Planning
Director.
(1) Fees charged for the issuance of a permit to keep chickens
will be set by the City Council.
(2) If the permit applicant is not the fee owner of the premises on
which the chickens are sought to be kept and for which the permit
would apply, the application shall be signed by all fee owners of
the premises.
(3) The City may refuse to grant or may revoke a permit if the
chickens become a nuisance, as evidenced by a second
substantiated violation (within 12 months of a first substantiated
violation) of this Section of the City Code, or Chapter 22 of the
City Code.
(4) The City may refuse to grant a permit to, or may revoke a
permit from, a person convicted of cruelty to animals.
Doc. #168232v.1
RNK: 1/7/2013 2
(5) Permits are non-transferable and do not run with the land.
(6) A permit is a license granted to the chicken keeper by the
City and does not create a vested zoning right.
.
(7) Prior to issuance of a permit, the prospective permit holder
must acknowledge they have read the chicken run educational
material provided by the City.
(8) Prior to issuance of a permit, the prospective permit holder
must provide a detailed sketch plan of the premises on which
chickens are sought to be kept, including the location, the
dimensions and design of the coop and run, establishing
compliance with the chicken coop and run specifications provided
in this Article.
(9) Prior to issuance of a permit, the prospective permit holder
must provide a plan for maintaining an adequate temperature in the
coop for the safety of the chicken hens. The plan must address
both extreme winter and summer temperature conditions.
(10) The permit application will be processed administratively.
It will not be referred to the City Council for consideration.
10-35 Each person holding a permit to keep chickens within the City must
comply with the following:
(1) The principal use of the specific property must be either
single-family residential or two-family residential. A permit will
not be issued for any property which is used principally for
something other than single-family or two-family. If the property's
principal use is two-family residential, then the property owner
must sign the permit in addition to the chicken keeper;
(2) No person may keep more than four (4) chickens;
(3) No person may keep a rooster;
(4) No person may allow chickens to range freely without
fencing or without a mobile pen;
(5) No person may keep any chickens inside a house or garage;
(6) No person may slaughter any chickens within the City;
Doc. #168232v.1
RNK: 1/7/2013 3
(7) Chickens must be provided a secure and well ventilated
roofed structure ("chicken coop");
(8) The roofed structure for the chickens may only be located in
a rear yard and must meet setback and building separations as
established in City zoning and building codes, except that the
roofed structure and fencing must maintain a 20-foot separation
from dwellings on adjacent properties;
(9) The roofed structure shall be fully enclosed, wind proof, and
have sufficient windows for natural light;
(10) All premises on which hens are kept or maintained shall be
kept clean from filth, garbage, and any substance which attracts
rodents. The coop and its surrounding must be cleaned frequently
enough to control odor. Manure shall not be allowed to
accumulate in a way that causes an unsanitary condition or causes
odors to be detected on another property. Failure to comply with
these conditions may result in removal of chickens from the
premises or revocation of a chicken permit.
(11) Chickens must be kept in the roofed structure, an attached
pen, or a detached mobile pen whenever they are unattended by the
keeper; but when attended by the keeper, the chickens are allowed
in a completely fenced exercise yard;
(12) The coop's attached pen must be securely constructed with
at least a mesh type material and shall have protective overhead
netting to keep the chickens separated from other animals;
(13) The coop's attached pen must be well drained so there is no
accumulation of moisture; and
(14) The floor area of the roofed structure or a combination of
the floor area and attached pen area must equal at least ten (10)
square feet of area per chicken.
(15) All grain and food stored for the use of the hens on a
premises with a chicken permit shall be kept in a rodent proof
container.
(16) Leg bandings are required on all chickens. The bands must
identify the owner and the owner’s address and telephone number.
SECTION 2. Section 113-174(d) of the Falcon Heights City Code is amended by adding
subsection (13) to read as follows:
Doc. #168232v.1
RNK: 1/7/2013 4
(13) Keeping of chickens as regulated by the Code.
SECTION 3. Section 113-181(d)(1) of the Falcon Heights City Code is amended to read as
follows:
(13) All accessory uses as permitted in the R-1 and R-2 Districts except that the
keeping of chickens, as regulated by the Code, is only allowed as accessory to a single-
family or two-family home.
SECTION 4. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication.
ADOPTED this ______ day of _______________, 2013, by the City Council of Falcon
Heights, Minnesota.
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
BY: _______________________________________
P e t e r L i n d s t r o m , M a y o r
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Bart Fischer, City Administrator/Clerk
St. Paul
HugoBlaine
Eagan
Minneapolis
Grant
Lakeville
Andover
East Bethel
Afton
Orono
Corcoran
PlymouthMedina
Ramsey
Dayton
Woodbury
Ham Lake
Lino Lakes
Oak Grove
May Twp.
Burns Twp.
Columbus Twp.
Bloomington
Rosemount
Eden Prairie
Shakopee
Edina
Burnsville
Maple Grove
Empire Twp.
Linwood Twp.
Cottage Grove
Marshan Twp.
Minnetonka
Vermillion Twp.
Lake Elmo
St. Francis
Savage
Hassan Twp.
Sand Creek Twp.
Brooklyn Park
Chaska
Spring Lake Twp.
Forest Lake Twp.
Chanhassen
Coon Rapids
Fridley
Maplewood
Prior Lake
Roseville
Apple Valley Hastings
Nininger Twp.
Shoreview
Victoria
Anoka
Farmington
Louisville Twp.
Champlin
Richfield
North Oaks
Helena Twp.Cedar Lake Twp.New Market Twp.
New Scandia Twp.
Greenfield
Inver Grove Heights
Credit River Twp.
Oakdale
Minnetrista
Independence
Dahlgren Twp.
Arden Hills
Stillwater Twp.
Crystal
Stillwater
Laketown Twp.
St. Louis Park
Golden Valley
Mound
Shorewood
Rogers
Mendota Heights
St. Lawrence Twp.
White Bear Twp.
Carver
Baytown Twp.
Jackson Twp.
Wayzata West Lakeland Twp.
New Brighton MahtomediBrooklyn Center Vadnais HeightsWhite Bear Lake
Hopkins
San Francisco Twp.
New Hope
NewportSouth St. Paul
Eureka Twp.
Jordan
West St. Paul
Forest Lake
Deephaven
Little Canada
Douglas Twp.
Fort Snelling (unorg.)
Hampton Twp.
Mounds View Dellwood
Castle Rock Twp.
Hanover
Robbinsdale
Centerville
Chaska Twp.
North St. Paul
Columbia Heights
St. Anthony
Tonka Bay
Coates
St. Paul Park
Ravenna Twp.
Grey Cloud Island Twp.
Circle Pines
Bethel
Falcon Heights
Oak Park Heights
Sunfish Lake
Spring Lake Park
Lilydale
Woodland
Osseo
Gem Lake
Vermillion
Excelsior
Maple Plain
Long Lake
Greenwood
Minnetonka Beach
Pine Springs
Lexington
White Bear Twp.Stillwater Twp.
Marine on St. Croix
Lauderdale
Loretto
Mendota
Medicine Lake
Birchwood Village
Landfall
Chickens in the Metro Area
Google spreadsheet + added staff research
Legend
Chickens
MAYBE
NO
YES
Published by Google Drive –Report Abuse – Updated automatically every 5 minutes
Chicken Laws for Minnesota Cities : Sheet1
CITY CHICKENS ALLOWED INFO
accessory
building
Eagan NO
Oakdale YES-with permit http://oakdale.govoffice2.com/vertical/Sites/%7B9D2ABE6F-4847-
Mounds View NO http://www.ci.mounds-view.mn.us/vertical/Sites/%7B9DACB450-8
Little Canada NO
http://www.ci.little-canada.mn.us/vertical/Sites/%7BEB0504CE-
3D9E-4F5B-8199-A5A488B9A257%7D/uploads/%7B30DF8DD9
-62C0-48BE-BA01-C18D4804C1F6%7D.PDF
Recently banned every
possibility of farm animals
in city limits
Apple Valley NO
Cottage Grove YES-but w/ 1 1/2 acres http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php?book_id=50
West St. Paul YES_w/permit & feet restr. only 2 under 5 acres
http://www.ci.west-saint-paul.mn.us/index.asp?
Type=B_LIST&SEC={5AB2A4C2-6052-4911-AF1B-
3C51575DB80A}#{D1265D7C-C172-4CA3-9CC6-
CFC4F97B81C4}
St. Paul YES_w/permit & feet restr.
Montrose YES http://www.montrose-mn.com/assets/files/docs/ZoningOrds/1022.p
Anoka YES-up to four http://www.anoka.govoffice2.com/vertical/Sites/%7B213A9A90-C8
Ramsey YES_with 3 acres
Otsego YES_with license http://www.ci.otsego.mn.us/vertical/Sites/%7B2D2448C9-1D69-4E
Maplewood YES-Approved July 11th, 2011 http://www.ci.maplewood.mn.us/DocumentView.aspx?DID=2035
St. Michael NO-in Residential under 4 acres
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Minnesota/smichael/cityof
f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:stmichael_mn
Ham Lake NO, only in R-A rural agriculture with 5 acres http://www.ci.ham-lake.mn.us/docs/article05.pdf
Dayton YES-with CUP in R-2
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Minnesota/dayton_mn/day
f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:dayton_mn
http://www.cityofdaytonmn.
20regarding%20Farm%
20Animals.pdf
http://www
f=template
$vid=amleg
Andover YES_with restrictions http://files.andovermn.net/pdfs/Clerk/CityCode/TITLE_12_Zoning_
Champlin NO
http://library1.municode.com/default-now/home.htm?
infobase=14283&doc_action=whatsnew
Blaine NO
Domestic farm animals, including cattle, horses, sheep, goats
and chickens are only permitted in Agricultural (AG) and Farm
Residential (FR) zoning districts
Roseville YES http://www.cityofroseville.com/index.aspx?NID=1677
Brooklyn Park NO
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Minnesota/brooklyn/brook
f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:brooklynpark_mn
Fridley YES-just passed
http://www.ci.fridley.mn.us/images/article-files/citycode/100%
20Health,%20Safety%20and%
20Welfare/Ch_101_Animal_Control.pdf
http://fridley.patch.com/artic
-council-oks-backyard-
chickens#photo-5798490
Plymouth NO-only in FRD future restricted development
http://plymouthmn.gov/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?
documentid=754
Brooklyn Park NO
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Minnesota/brooklyn/brook
f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:brooklynpark_mn
Minnetonka Yes-1 per .10 acres
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Minnesota/minneton/cityo
f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0
$vid=amlegal:minnetonka_mn$anc=
Maple Grove NO- at least 1 acre
http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?
clientId=13556&stateId=23&stateName=Minnesota
Shorewood MAYBE-no laws against?
Vadnais Heights 1 acre required
http://www.cityvadnaisheights.com/Government/City-
Code/Zoning-Code.aspx
New Brighton No rules?
Thank you for your question in regards to backyard chickens.
New Brighton ordinance currently does not address chickens.
There is a nuisance code which may address many concerns if
someone had chickens and didn’t take care of them but it is not
specifically addressed at this time. If someone keeps chickens
they would be required to ensure they don’t become a nuisance
because of odor or noise. Let me know if you have any other
questions.
Lexington NO
Burnsville YES
http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php?
book_id=468
Richfield YES-up to three in residential zoning http://www.cityofrichfield.org/Residents/Codes/docs/ch09.pdf
Saint Paul Park YES
http://www.stpaulpark.govoffice.com/vertical/Sites/%
7B917EB38B-D67A-4E8B-9D54-1241156F27C8%7D/uploads/%
7B30F853F7-2F51-46FE-9884-9CB6FBAAD5ED%7D.PDF
Newport YES http://www.ci.newport.mn.us/documents/Chapter6Animals.pdf
Mounds View NO
http://www.ci.mounds-view.mn.us/vertical/Sites/%7B9DACB450-
86B3-4304-946D-6016EF70E9E3%7D/uploads/%7B226EF007-
3579-4362-BD2A-3CC9A0EC8557%7D.PDF
North Saint Paul NO
§ 95.24 EXOTIC PETS/NON-DOMESTIC ANIMALS. No person
shall harbor any exotic or non- domestic pets, nor build, maintain
or use a structure for the keeping of such animals within the city
limits.
Bloomington YES http://www.ci.bloomington.mn.us/code/index.php/o/page/p/1119
Robbinsdale YES-with permit
http://www.ci.robbinsdale.mn.us/Download/City%
20Code/Chapter%209.pdf
Saint Anthony
NO-Not closer than 500 ft of any building or
property
http://www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us/vertical/Sites/%7B5ED4AFB9-
D450-4F68-BA29-2600D3C2A620%7D/uploads/%7BED535969-
1E1F-4A2F-BE7B-6B456E2C9227%7D.PDF
Falcon Heights No law against?
Columbia Heights No law against?
Page 1 of 1Chicken Laws for Minnesota Cities
12/10/2012https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&hl=en_US&key=0AkE_sjjr...