Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCMin_69Mar13REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 13, 1969 1 1 1 2860 The regular meeting of March 13, 1969 was called to order at 7:00 P.M. with the following meanbers present: Mayor Warkentien, Clerk Taylor, Councilmen Stone, Black and Ecklund. Also present were Attorney Seed, Engineer Lemberg and Treasurer Olsen. Minutes: Stone maned, Black seconded that the minutes of the Meeting of February 27, 1969 be approved as corrected. Motion was carried unanimously. Credit Memo frcan Northland Insurance: Stone moved, seconded by Ecklund that the minutes of the Public Hearing on Storm Sewer Project 1969-1 held March 6, 1969 be approved as corrected. Motion carried ~uianimously. A Credit Memo was received fran Northland Insurance indicating that as of January 1, 1969, we have a credit of $1,572.00 for Worlcmen~s Compiensation. It is due to changing the Fire Department to a 100 Volunteer Organization. Public Hearing continued at 8:00 P.M. on Storm Sewer Project 1969-1 in northwest corner of the Village. Brad Lemberg: Under this storm sewer project, the County hasn~t been notified by Roseville. The County has lead us to believe that unless we go along with it, it won't be done. They are not upgrading until the catch basins are in. The County is having Mr. Floyd Snyker, Assistant County Engineer, come up tonight. Attorney Seed: If the road were to obstruct the natural flowage and cause it to back up, then the County would have an obligation to keep t~ drainage as it was prior to the roads construction. The property owners could have a cause of action. Brad Lemberg: The road caused no drainage problem until the development of that area. When the developer filled the area, he put in the minimum amount of fill and, consequently, some of the lots are below maximum grade. We are dumping out water without authorization with that culvert. If the County participates, it will put the catch basins in along its right-ofway. Engineer Lemberg Previously, we would be paying $].1G,000 to Roseville to provide to Residents: drainage to the northwest corner. The question was raised as to what the County would do ~,rith RASelawn. Since the last meeting, we have seen Roseville's plans. They do not show catch basins on Prior and Autumn along Roselawn and removing the existing culvert put in a couple of years ago. It is the assumption that the County and Falcon Heights are going in. Fairview and Tatum has a stub for a manhole on Prior. We would still basically have the over-the-ground flow as we do now. Again, I say that this is with the assuu~tion that Falcon Heights and the County are going. Martin Joyce: I am on the Maplewood Village Council and an Attorney engaged by some of the residents of the northwest area. I can readily understand. your position here due to my experience in Maplewood. This is the type of thing that people fail to see the benefit of. Obviously, the people can only take so much because of the property tax and one assessment after another. Would the County allow us to participate in this type of project if there would be an accumulation of water on their right-of moray? Floyd Sn~yker 1 1 1 Martin Joyce: Mr. Snyker: 28b1 Actually, this culvert was installed by Falcon Heights to rvn drainage to Roseville. If Roseville blocks it, this will create a dam by the nature of the roadway. If there are not adequate storm sewers available, the County would not undertake construction of the road. You don't allow them to cut that off if it would allow a cut- off of your road. If they block it, the water would then accumulate on Prior and Roselawn and block the road. The County doesn't pay for it then. Mr. Joyce: The County isn't going to allow anybody to cut into it. Mr. Snyker: It was done with the assumption that amore stable system would be put in in the practicable future. Mr. Joyce: There is a moral issue involved. The other side of the coin involved the few people affected. Almost everybody feels that the expense does not justify the benefit. I don't know of anyone in the area that feels th at $30,000 would justify the result. If seems to me th at when you undertake storm sewer construction, that you have to take in a larger area. It is not economically feasible in a small area like this. You might be a!.little premature on this. If you waited, then ultimately, the problem would be resolved without Falcon Heights taking arty action. I don't feel that the County would allow or contribute to the plan unless the corner of Prior and Roselawn was taken care of . Maplewood held out for $200 in a project with St. Paul and eventually it got it. If the County upgrades Fairview or Rosel afari, a substantial expense would be born by the owner for this. What good is storm sewer without curb and gutter? This is just the beginning of more and more assessments. Roseville is the growing community -- Falcon Heights is small and already grown. Roseville wants the storm sewer. Engineer Lemberg: For eight or nine years we have been waiting for an outlet for this area. Mr. Joyce: What does a one mill levy in Falcon Heights? Mayor Warkentien: $3,71l~.00. Mr. Joyce: Do you feel thatthis would be worth nine mills? To Falcon Heights, that is a lot of money. Councilman Black: Storm sewers operate well without curb and gutter. You are telling us things that are pretty obvious. Mr. Joyce: The only streets I am predicting are Fairview and Roselawn for curb and gutter. In conclusion, if we did not order this project, the problem on Roselawn would eventually be resolved by the County and Roseville. Engineer Lemberg: Tatum is trouble every year. Where do we drain water? Mr. Sr~yker: I talked with the foreman and he had already had three calls about that street this year. Engineer Lemberg: Mr. Joyce: Councilman Black: Paul Romanowski 1920 Roselawn: C. Gustav Hard 1937 Autumn: Mr. Snyker: 1 1 2862 When this was computed on a point to point basis, it came out to $1,200 per lot. We can predict how much water will run off. We know how many calls we have been getting. We have already had the Maintenance Man out keeping the ditch open. First of all, we have no place to run the water to. It is not a bunch of "if!s" because we have the plans and it is not on it. You have almost 100 opposition. The point is, in my understanding, that you all have been quite in favor of this. I have not made up ~ mind. I can see great problens if that culvert is removed. Has ar~one pursued the idea of an old culvert under Tatum? It was brought to ~ attention but I can find no record of it. The foreman would look for it if someone would show him where it is. A list of names was presented to the Council which supposedly showed who Mr. Joyce was representing. Councilman Black: Did you indicate that these people would be interested in something like $200 per lot? Mr. Joyce: They felt that they wanted to help but not at this expense. Mayor Warkentien: We have already established a precedent from the NE Storm Sewer Project for assessment. Mr. Joyce: This is why Roseville can do it because they are spread over a large area. Mayor Warkentien read the napes off the list presented to the Council. Rev. Storasli I would not have engaged an attorney for this. I don't know 1916 N. Prior: haw my name got on that. Although I am involved, I too turned to the cost assessment, but I don't know how I got on that list. Mr. Joyce: Will Rogers asked me to come and I did attend a meeting at his neighbor's home. I am representing a number of people but I can't tell you exactly whom. Wilbur Rogers 19t~7 Autumn: Is there anyone else here who does not want to be on that list? Joseph Anderson: I am against it. Mr. Rogers: There axe ten houses on Roselawn between Tatum and Fairview. Eight of the owners are ~ainst it; the other two, I don't know. Ed Finegan I didn't authorize it. (The use of his name to engage an attorney) 1918 Roselas~n: 2863 Engineer Lemberg: Based on normal run-off and point to point basis, they originally gave us $1,200 per parcel. We brought it down to $350. Any project of this type you have to start with all and cut down because you can't add. It is a normal story that as areas grow and there are mature people, they want curb and gutter. We know assessments are tough. Up here we have a chance and a possibility of obtaining an out let for this area. This small area flows to the north. Mr. Joyce: The residents indicated that in 1958 Sanitary Sewers were installed, in 19b6 water and there's been construction within the area since. They are paying annual installments which are substantial and when you put on an additional assessment like this and add it to the County roads and the rising cost of real estate, it is rough. Councilman Black: (1n what basis would there be no problem if the culvert were taken? Mr. Joyce: I don't think that the County would allow this. It probably would have a hard time. It seems to me that the water would flow across. Mr. Snyker: It was pointed out that the culvert was not authorized. In the past, when roads are under water with no storm sewers, the County has a tendency to raise the roads. You are into a problem where you are saying th at if it doesn't go through, the County is involved in a position to shove this down Roseville's throat. We don't allow the road to become flooded -- b~at if it does,. we can raise it . If Falcon Heights didn't pay for and share the cost of oversizing the pipes, do you think we could go out and put in catch basins anyway to drain into Roseville? I think the compromise should be worked out between Roseville and Falcon Heights; the County doesn't want to be in the middle of it. Mr. Joyce: You can see that this is a bad deal. Engineer Lemberg: You would find that the cost would be considerably higher if the County wasn't already helping out. Do you know how much it would cost to go north and find some place to get rid of it? Mr. Joyce: The only problem is the catch basins on Roselawn. Councilman Black: The County already paying about $l~0,000 for their share of the project. Would the people be entirely satisfied if the culvert were removed. Mr. Joyce: I don't think, that as a practical matter, there would be air problem. Rev. Storasli: Without the culvert there is no place for the water to go, period. I think you have to look at it frown both sides. I don't think there is any future for us if we don't go now. How would the cost compare for this project and St. Antho~r? Engineer Lemberg: Estimated cost without this area, University area or Fair Grounds including just east of Snelling and South of Roselawn comes to about $lt33,000, at present day cost. It would cover about 70 acres and that just places it to the south border of Falcon Heights. Mayor Warkentien: It would be financed by assessment. Mr. McCleary: I am assuming you are talking about punting in catch basins on the south side of Roselawn. 286? Engineer Lemberg: The ~.tean ate proposal was this at the last meeting and still having the right in the future to tie 3.n. The assessment is not based on arm engineering data. The normal assessment based on r`un-off formula and entire area would cost about $1,200 per lot.. But we refused this offer. The Village can divide this $350 up. Richard Bandon: Last meeting we talked about engineering aspects and was there a legal right to have drainage through this area? Attorney Seed: The straight answer is the law does not help you. If it could be shown that the natural flowage of water was to the north and that the water did flow to the north and did not collect and if it could be shown that prior to the area being developed, the water didn't collect to the area south of the line, then there would be a legal case. The difficulty is establishing, historically, water flowage to the north. Most, if not all, of the water did collect in ponding areas south of Roselawn. The real issue is this fact question. It doesn't look too promising for the residents south of Roselawn. Mr. Joyce: The County would have maps showing the prior collection of water. Engineer Lemberg: Some of the areas were filled as much as three feet. Mr. Blumfield After that pond is drained and dry, the construction company 1900 Tatum: intends to build. Th at means that Roseville would get the tax base; they just want us to pay; it's not going to benefit r~'alcon Beights. It rains so hard sometimes that no storm sewer would take it. Tatum Street has never been in better shape than it is today. I think that the water from Roselawn runs north . Engineer Lemberg: The other day I was out there. If flows in both directions; it Tits right in front of your driveway. I explained at the hearing that each lot would be cheked and those not contributing would not be assessed. The policy established is the direction it roans off the flow of the lot determines the district the lot will be in. I am not going to go into this. Attorney Seed: This is a very acceptable way of assessing. Engineer Lemberg: If we include those two lots on the corner of Summer and Prior, we pay $700 more. Mrs . I~.rd : If tY~ey are contriibuting water, then they should be paying . Engineer Leamb erg: They are paying for the south district when it comes in. It's just a means of determining this. 1 f Mr. 1 i i~l 2865 Hard: In discussion with the Conservation Department, I inquired about this area. The trees are about 27,~years old, the ponding area about 27 years vegetation. The gravel was taken at that time to build the lot on the north side. That has all been filled in over the years because each year the policy was to dump the soil from a greenhouse. There are some fine 1ega1 points of the lot but it has been established that the general flowage is to the north and the deepest point was to the north of Roselawn at that time there should have been a culvert and no one has taken the time to find out about it. Mr. Joyce: I think you should look at this realistically. The Village of Roseville, in stating that it is cutting off the culvert, is using leverage to make Falcon Heights submit to their will. Mayor Warkentien: Did they say it would be cut off? Engineer Lemberg: You can leave it there, but the water wouldn't go mere. Roseville doesn't care. It wi11 cut down the pipes all the way down. I couldn't state the cost of it. It took its bids for the different size pipes. It just drops one size all the way clown. We are talking about l2'' ~ 72t1 pipe. Mr. Joyce: What is the difference in comparison between 1211 and 1591. Engineer Lemberg: I have to low the grade of 'ihe :.and - I can't just say. Mr. Stump: The comment has been made that this area was farm land prior to subdivision-and that the water has drained north.. Some- where along the 1:ine~ the County built a road. It would have provided suitable drainage to the north if it had stopped drainage of the land. This might answer the question about the hidden culvert. Engineer Lemberg: I have no indication of that culvert. If the County dreated. damage to farms and land, it would have. taken care of then. Mr. Sr~yker: In the past, anytime there was a drainage, the County installed a culvert. On this particular lot, the men who checked it did neot find a culvert. Mr. Stump: Then all it would do would be to raise the assessment for those two lots and for the others. Do they want to charge us on the amount of water or the number of lots? Engineer Lemberg: Same thing -about $350 per lot. Stump: Still, the more area put 3.n, the more Roseville will get for each parcel above that. Engineer Lemberg: We are to determine which parcels are included. The drainage area is established, if we make some drainage come in outside of another drainage area, we have to include it. We are not talking about pipe size. Mayer Warkentien: Our first price from them was $118,000. We gradually reduced i.t and that is when we came-out for a public hearing. We knew we couln't assess you people fora $!18,000 project. We thought this was at least good for a presentation to you. Mr. Stump: I see water running down from Summer to Autumn. Engineer Lemberg: The water on Summer breaks across at the corner lots. The physical break is slightly :around the corner. As far as driving on the streets, the Summer Street residents derive benefit from this project but then so are the people who visit you and the school buses that pick your children up for school. Councilman Black: Don't get the idea that one or two are in favor even with the culvert being gone. We had little children walking to school up to their knees in water in the Northeast section. Ray Garcia Pretty hefty cost for a small benefit. That culvert wasn't 1906 Prior: here for years but the water went across the street. The County will dam up the-road. What happens a year or two from now when Fairview is upgraded? There is going to be some improvement there. Let's assume that there is going to have to be something done. We are going to assess some people on Fairview. Why couldn't we tie it in to our own system? Don't we have an alternative to hook up to our own system? What happens if the County decides to upgrade Fairview? 2866 Engineer Lemberg: The County has a policy whereby it won't upgrade until there is a storm sewer. That is in a different drainage district. You can put in but the cost is going to be that much more for the people to the north. We foresee that the cost for the south portion is going to be greater than this. We are saying that this is the cheapest way out. Mr. Joyce: How does the ditch section on the south side of Roselawn drain? Engineer Lemberg: Part of it drains to the culvert. You would have a ditch about dix feet deep to_continue this. Ed Finegan: I am in favor of the minimum plan and I look at it in several ways. It's a reasonable insurance to guarantee me against the problems which nature, the County and Roseville may generate. Secondly, I think that it has the added advantage of removing me from the St . Anthor~q project. Larry Buegler: Are we correct in asses that in some point of time we will be in some drainage system? Engineer Lemberg: Yes. Larry Buegler: It might seem that it would be cheaper for those who are go3~g to be involved in it at tFiis time. My property is going to be improved because everyone isn't going to slop on my yard and my children won't be playing in $se pond. Will Rogers: Would the cost be less if we only wanted one catch basin? Engineer Lemberg: I rather doubt it becausethe cost is much greater than the cost they are asking from us. Mr. Joyce: It isn't going to flow along the is it? 2867 street from that whole district Councilman Black: Most people are inclined to think that they won't have ar~y problem, but it looks like there is going to be some problem. Are we looking for a free ride? Engineer Lemberg: We are not interested in a catch basin. You are still draining an area. We are paying for a capacity to an outlet. Soaaebody has to pay for this outlet. I am not saying that we have to pay for an increase for pipe all the way down. Mayor Warkentien: Would it help your problem to pay $17.00 per year instead of $35.~ and spread it over 20 years? (No reply} Engineer Lemberg: We are not saying $350 per parcel. The lot that was 20,000 would pay twice as much as the 10,000 square foot lot. If the policy is changed, then you can go into the south district. Forty-five percent of the water runs off, the other fifty-five percent sinks in. We have asked Roseville to cut down, but it has indicated that it will go down no further. Roseville assess- ments are based on the average 10,000 square foot lot. They assess $200 and commercial is assessed on a different basis. Rhe rest of it is paid on general taxes. Its costs on this portion were about 3~ cents per square foot. The total cost has increased. Those people who go ahead should not have to pay for the increased cost for someone else later on. Paul Romanowski: Do you actually think that we eventually will have to have storm sewer back here? Engineer Lemberg: Yes, eventually it will come from the south. This is becoming a mature area. Paul Romanowski: If that is the case, this would be a more economical choice. Three hundred and fifty dollars per lot is a lot of money to me but if we don't take it now it may go up. What's the actual projection for Roselawn? Mr. Snyker: They are talking sometime beyond 1972. Roselawn is relatively low in priority. Putting in this storm sewer makes it possible for Roselawn to be upgraded. We have totake priority in line with money available. Mayor Warkentien: Are you being presented to upgrade for Rosedale? Mr. Sr~rker : No . Mayor Warkentien: Would you people like a show of hands on the minimum plan? What catch basins would you put in? Mr. S'nyker: MicIl3lock between Fairview and Tatum - one; Tatum - two; and Fairview -three. Engineer Lemberg: This plan is the plan drawn by Roseville, with the assumption that all would participate. There was some misunderstanding that there would be put in. The only other we would have to install would be the two catch basins at Tatum. The other catch basins are included in the $111,000. Mr. Sriyker: The $11.x,000 would be increased by the water on Roselawn if the County did not go in. 2868 Councilman Black: You have been involved with Roseville on the matter of price and have been exceedingly successful in getting low terms. Would you think that they would consider a maximum of $10,000. Engineer Lemberg: I would say this is the price we are down to. It just is not going any farther. I didn't even put it into writing until it came down to $350. I don't see why it would have to come down. Larry Buegler: We are hereinafter immune from the St. Anthony System for the part that will have to put in on general taxes? We are still liable to general tax though. Attorney Seed: It is not impossible, legally, that sometime in the future th eDillage might assume a larger share out of general funds. Larry Buegler: That is no guarantee that the proportion of such future cost could be chan~dby a different council. Attorney Seed: I am pretty sure that you are overplaying this. You can't guarantee anything in this world. Mr. Sn®ker: If this developed into a dog fight, then the County would step out and let the villages pay the $1.0,000 for the road right-of-way. The County could turn Roselawn over to the Villages and it would no longer be a County Road. Mr. Joyce: General tax assessments are tax deductible and property tax assessments are not. Councilman Black: People wanted us to place a higher assessment on the School area in the NE project, but we couldn't do that because they didn't contribute at~y more water than any other property. Engineer Lemberg: Roseville bills $350 per lot and the Village will refigure this in terms of net cost . Warkentien asked for a show of hands for the minimum project. Of those present, eight voted for the project and nine were against it. Stone moved that the Village proceed with the proposal on the basis of the minimum plan to provide access and drainage as shown on Sheet 16 of 23 of Roseville's plans. Taylor seconded. The following vote was recorded: Warkentien - No, Taylor -Yes, Councilmen Stone - Yes, Black - Yes and Ecklund - No. The Attorney advised that for such a Council initiated project a ?~/5 vote must be received. He also stated that if 35~ of the benefited property owners would petition then only a majority vote wound be needed. Warkentien moved that the motion to adopt the resolution be reconsidered. Stone seconded. The following vote was recorded: Warkentien - Yes, Taylor - Yes, Councilmen Stone - Yes, Black - Yes, Ecklund - No. Stone again moved adoption of the following resolution: 2869 RESOLDTION ORDERING STORM SE4~ER Il~PRrOVEMENT OF 1969-1 AND ADTHORIZING VILLAGE CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE VILLAGE OF ROSEVILLE TO CONSTR~TCT SAID Il~ROVEMENT. WHEREAS, after due Notice of Public Hearing on the construction of Storm Sewer Improvement 1969-1 for the Village of Falcon Heights, Minnesota, two hearings on said improvement were duly held and the Council.:_heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and fully considered the same, and WHEREAS, said improvement is to be made under a cooperative agreement with the Vill,~age of Roseville by the terms of which the Village of Roseville is to contract to construct said improvement, and WHEREAS, an alternate proposal involving the construction of part of said. storm sewer improvement was presented to the Village Council and duly considered, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Falcon Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient, and necessary that that part of said Storm Sewer Improvement of 1969-1 which provides drainage as shown on Sheet 16 of 23 of the Village of Rosville's plans, be constructed and that it is to include catch basins and ~,~~ leads at the intersection of Prior and A~x~umn. 2. The Village Clerk and Mayor are hereby authorized to enter into a cooperative agreement with the Village of Roseville by the terms of which the Village of Roseville shall contract to construct said improvement that part of said Storm Sewer Improvement 1969-1 herein authorized to be made. Motion was duly seconded by Taylor and the following vote was recorded: Warkentien - Yes, Taylor - Yes, Stone - Yes, Black - Yes, Ecklund - No. Whereupon, the motion was declared passed. Warkentien explained, after the vote was recorded, that his motion to reconsider was based on the almost even split of the home owners and being that it was so close and as a majority of the Council favored it, we should proceed. Henry Dachtera: Taylor moved, Warkentien seconded that Henry Dachtera be authorized to attend the Fifth Annual Emergency Care Seminar at North Memorial Hospital in Robbinsdale for three days and be paid $15.00 per day. No registration fee is required as he will be teaching in the program. Motion carried unanimously. Payment for Last Black moved, seconded by Ecklund that Tina Vavoulis be paid $17.00 Set of Minutes: for the last set of minutes for October 10 and 2?~, 1968 which we received February. l3, 1969. Ayes: Warkentien, Taylor, Black, Ecklund. Nays: Stone. Motion was carried. Street Signs: Stone moved that April 10, 1969 be set as the opening date for receiving bids on new street signs. Mayor Seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Specifications have been written so that bids will be received both on Embossed Steel Street Signs with Beaded Legend or Scotchlite Legend Street Signs. Alleys and Street Stone moved, seconded bar Taylor that the Village Engineer prepare Maintenance 1969: plans and sp ecifications for the 1969 Street Maintenance Contract which will cover the alleys in the Northome Section. Motion was carried unanimously. See minutes of 9-11-69 2870 Lindig Property: The County Welfare Department feels that it has an obligation to go ahead with the sale of the Lindig Property to the residents for $8,000. Attorney was in contact with the Ramsey County Attorney. He advised the Board last week of the Village's interest and a spokesman for the property owners said that if the Village can condemn the property as it sees fit, they would hold off until the end of plarch and not finalize the agreement if Falcon Heights decided to purchase the property. There is no indication that they would go below the $8,000. Black will bring the Recreation Committee up-to-date on this Friday evening. Fire Reports: Ecklund read Fire Reports 772 and 773. Employment of Mr. Slama was advised that his part-time employment would be Bert Slama: taken up at the March 26, 1969 meeting. The suggested title of his position is Public Safety Officer. He would work for $2.50 per hour, including automobile, with a maximum of four hours per day and $100 per month. He cannot wear his uniform due to the connection with the Fire Department and the risk of losing his reticent benefits. Building Code: Black will take up the revision of the existing Building Code with Mr. Magnuson, Building Inspector, at a later date. NSP Rates: It was noted from a letter from NSP that effective March 11, 1969 the gas rates will be going up. Ordinance Banning Ordinance was proposed by Ecklund which would ban Keys Being Keys in Ignition: Left in the Ignition and provide a penalty for violations thereof. This will be discussed further at the next meeting. Bicycle License: Ecklund stated that it might be a good idea to look into the possibility of licensing the bikes in the Village to stop theft. This matter will be discussed at the next meeting. Next Meeting: Black moved, Ecklund seconded that the next regular meeting of the Council be held at 7:00 P.M., March 26, 1969 in order to have a quorom. Motion carried unanimously. Human Rights Thank you note was received from Mrs. Helen Kain, Secretary Commission: for Human Rights Commission, for the budget allotted for its minutes at the last meeting of the Council. Bills: Taylor moved, seconded by Warkentien that the following bills be paid.: Donnor Communications - Monitors and Cords $1,009.80 Federal Reserve Bank - FWH 271.90 State Treasurer - SWH lt8.20 State Treasurer - P.E.R.A. 93.02 N.S.P. - 2000 Roselawn 86.37 A. B. Dick Products - Office Supplies l~3.75 Reverend Wayne Vankirk - Jan Human Rights Minutes 9.19 Krauses' Bakery - Host RCLM Meting 5.8~. Inter-City Printing Co. - ID Cards 7.25 Ramsey County Treasurer - From State for Constr. Th+~x~ne Coal & Oil - Heat 3,000.00 137.16 Minnesota Fire Extinguisher - Recharge 13.00 1 2871 Oxygen Service Company -Oxygen _ 10.33 Sun Newspapers -Notice of Public Hearing 69-1 18.60 Thomas & Grayston -Office Supplies I~.20 B & E Patrol, Tnc -Dog Control 95,00 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc -Engineer 68.00 Thomas & Grayston -Office Supplies 6.00 Ramsey County Treasurer - Str Mtce and Lighting 282.56 Adjournment: Upon motion, the meeting was adjourned at 12:12 AM. Signed A rove ~~<-.a `. ~ /`~-d'~~ezt I~ l i l _J 1