HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-26-2022 Regular Meeting CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
Regular Meeting of the City Council
City Hall 2077 West Larpenteur Avenue AGENDA October 26, 2022 at 7:00 P.M.
A. CALL TO ORDER: B. ROLL CALL: GUSTAFSON____ LEEHY___
MEYER ___ WEHYEE___ VACANT___ STAFF PRESENT: LINEHAN_______
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
D. PRESENTATION:
1. Receiving the Feasibility Report and Ordering Public Hearing for the 2023 Pavement
Management Program (PMP)
E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. October 12, 2022 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS: G. CONSENT AGENDA: 1. General Disbursements through: 10/20/22 $222,924.42
Payroll through: 10/15/22 $23,798.72
Wire Payments through: 10/15/22 $16,067.73 2. City Licenses 3. 2023 Ramsey County Select Committee on Recycling & The Environment (SCORE) Grant Submittal and Enter into Agreement with Ramsey County for Funding
4. Appointment of Michael Tracy to Parks Commission 5. Appointment of Randi Lundell to Parks Commission 6. Flexible Benefits Plan Amendment
H: POLICY ITEMS:
I. INFORMATION/ANNOUNCEMENTS: J. COMMUNITY FORUM:
Please limit comments to 3 minutes per person. Items brought before the Council will be
referred for consideration. Council may ask questions for clarification, but no council
action or discussion will be held on these items. K. ADJOURNMENT:
BLANK PAGE
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota __________________________
Item Receive Feasibility Report and Order Public Hearing for the 2023 Pavement
Management Program
Description
In 2022, the City Council ordered the preparation of a feasibility report for the
2023 Pavement Management Project (PMP). The following streets have been
identified to be considered for improvements in 2023:
• Holton Street, Larpenteur Avenue to Roselawn Avenue
• Albert Street, Ruggles Street to Roselawn Avenue
• Sheldon Street, Ruggles Street to Roselawn Avenue
• Ruggles Street, Holton Street to Hamline Avenue
• Garden Avenue, East Snelling Service Drive to Hamline Avenue
In accordance with City Council direction, a feasibility report has been
prepared that details the proposed design, neighborhood impact, and
estimated cost of the proposed 2023 Pavement Management Program. Copies
of the completed feasibility report are attached. The next step in the process is
for the Council to accept the feasibility report and to schedule a public hearing.
A resolution receiving the feasibility report and ordering the public hearing for
November 9, 2022, is attached. A portion of the 2023 PMP is proposed to be
assessed. The approval of the attached resolution is required for the Minnesota
Chapter 429 Assessment Process.
At the public hearing on the November 9, the Council will need to take the
following actions:
• Should Ruggles pathway constructed?
• Which layout options for Garden Avenue?
• Hold Public Improvement Hearing, and Adopt Resolution Ordering
Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the 2023
Pavement Management Project.
Meeting Date October 26, 2022
Agenda Item Presentation D1
Attachment Feasibility Report, Resolution 22-50
Submitted By Jesse Freihammer, City Engineer
Budget Impact This project has the following financial implications for the City and property
owners along the streets being considered for improvements:
• Assessments levied in accordance with the City’s assessment policy.
• Use of Municipal State Aid (MSA) and street infrastructure funds to pay
the City’s portion of the project.
• Expenditure of utility fund dollars to pay for repairs needed to the
existing utility system.
Attachment(s) • Feasibility Report
• Resolution 22-50
Action(s)
Requested
Receive Feasibility Report and Order Public Hearing set for November 9, 2022,
for the 2023 Pavement Management Program.
Feasibility Report
2023 Pavement Management Program
Project FH-23-01
Holton Street, Larpenteur Avenue to Roselawn Avenue
Albert Street, Ruggles Street to Roselawn Avenue
Sheldon Street, Ruggles Street to Roselawn Avenue
Ruggles Street, Holton Street to Hamline Avenue
Garden Avenue, from East Snelling Drive to Hamline Avenue
Prepared by: Jesse Freihammer
City Engineer City of Falcon Heights I hereby certify that this feasibility report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
___________________________________________, P.E. Licensed No. 47272
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This feasibility report has been prepared for the 2023 Pavement Management Project, FH 23-01. The
project was initiated by council/staff as part of the City’s Pavement Management Program. This report
consists of a detailed investigation of the streets proposed for improvements, listed below. A map
showing the street locations can be found on Page 4. Area 1 - Mill and Overlays
Area 1 of the proposed project involves milling the pavement, spot curb replacement, spot utility
improvements and pavement replacement. Utility improvements for the project include the repair
of selected storm sewer manholes and catch basins. As has been discussed during development of
the CIP, the City Council has expressed the desire to complete maintenance on City streets that, if
neglected for too long, would need to be reconstructed. The proposed mill and overlays included in
the 2023 PMP achieves this, while also maintaining a neighborhood approach to minimize the
inconveniences residents experience due to construction. Streets include:
• Holton Street, Larpenteur Avenue to Roselawn Avenue
• Albert Street, Ruggles Street to Roselawn Avenue
• Sheldon Street, Ruggles Street to Roselawn Avenue
• Ruggles Street, Holton Street to Hamline Avenue
Area 2 - Reconstruction
Garden Avenue, from East Snelling Drive to Hamline Avenue, is proposed for pavement reclamation
to address deficiencies in the pavement and base section of the roadway. This area is proposed for a
significant amount of curb removal. Also proposed are impacted driveway replacements, and minor
storm sewer and sanitary sewer work.
The existing street design changes at Holton so staff recommends Council look at the new options as
two segments. Segment 1 is west of Holton, Segment 2 is east of Holton and includes the elementary
school. Different decisions can be made on the width of the roadway and if a pathway should be
installed for each segment. The decisions can be made independent for each segment.
Roadway Geometry was examined for benefits, including lowering driver speeds and decreasing
stormwater run-off. Reduction of the roadway width would result in some loss of parking.
Pathway Installation on the north side of the street was examined. Previous Council Action
determined, if a pathway is installed with this project, costs would not be assessed and snow
removal would be done by City staff. All proposed sidewalk options are located within the existing
curb line so no further impacts to residents’ yards or loss of driveway space would occur, even
though the City has additional right of way and could exercise this right.
Segment 1 – Options
• Option 1 (Existing Street Design)
o Street Width 36 Feet
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
2
o 11-foot Drive Lanes
o 7-foot Parking Lanes on Both Sides
o No Sidewalk
• Option 2 (Existing Street Design Modified)
o Street Width 36 Feet
o 11-foot Drive Lanes
o 8-foot Parking Lanes on South Side
o 6-foot shoulder on North Side, No Parking
o No Sidewalk
• Option 3 (Concept B modified)
o Street Width 34 Feet (Narrowed 2 Feet by Moving the North Curb)
o 11-foot Drive Lanes
o 7-foot Parking Lane on South Side
o 5-foot shoulder on North Side, No Parking
o No Sidewalk
• Option 4 (Concept A)
o Street Width 29 Feet (Narrowed 7 Feet by Moving the North Curb)
o 11-foot Drive Lanes
o 7-foot Parking Lane on South Side
o 7-foot Sidewalk on North Side, Next to the Curb
Segment 2– Options
• Option 5 (Existing Design)
o Street Width 42 feet
o 12-foot Drive Lanes
o 9-foot parking South Side Only
o 9-foot Shoulder North Side Currently Signed No Parking.
o No Sidewalk
• Option 6 (Concept G)
o Street Width 32-foot (Narrowed 10 Feet by Moving North Curb)
o 12-foot Drive Lanes
o 8-foot Parking South Side Only
o Elimination of North Shoulder Currently Signed No Parking.
o No Sidewalk
o East of School Property: North Side Shoulder for School Pick-Up Queuing, No
Sidewalk
• Option 7 (Concept F)
o Street Width 32-foot (Narrowed 10 Feet by Moving North Curb)
o 12-foot Drive Lanes
o 8-foot Parking South Side Only
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
3
o Elimination of North Shoulder Currently Signed No Parking.
o 6-foot Sidewalk
o 5-foot Boulevard Between Sidewalk and Curb Adjacent to the School Property
o East of School Property: North Side Shoulder for School Pick-Up Queuing, 7-foot
Sidewalk, No Boulevard
o Bumpouts at Intersection to Eliminate Parking Near Intersection/Shorter Pedestrian
Crossings Ruggles Pathway Connection
The right-of-way connecting Ruggles Avenue from Pascal Street to Holton Street was evaluated for a
pathway. The existing right of way is 12 feet wide. The existing surface is unimproved so access can be
limited to some users, particularly those in wheelchairs or those who are less mobile. Options for this
pathway include installing a concrete sidewalk, installing a permeable paver sidewalk or doing no
improvements. If improvements are not completed, consideration of vacating the right of way could be
considered since the unimproved segment would not meet ADA standards. Project Cost
The total project cost for Falcon Heights is estimated to be $1,688,000 if sidewalks are fully installed on
Garden Avenue. This also includes contingencies and overhead costs. If Ruggles pathway was added, this
would add between $35,000 and $51,000 to the costs. This estimate applies to all options but is the
highest cost scenario. All the street cost options are generally the same with only some minor estimated
reductions. Funding for the project will be provided through assessments from the benefitting properties,
utility funds, street infrastructure funds, and Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds. A summary of the
estimated project costs and funding sources are as follows:
Mill and Overlay Street Costs: $427,000
Garden Avenue Street Costs: $680,000
Garden Ave Sidewalk (West): $172,000
Garden Ave Sidewalk (East): $127,000
Storm Sewer Costs: $242,000
Sanitary Sewer Costs: $ 40,000
Funding:
Approximated Assessments: $533,000
Street Fund: $287,000
Municipal State Aid: $586,000
Storm Sewer Fund: $242,000
Sanitary Sewer Fund: $ 40,000
Project Schedule
If this project is approved, the proposed project schedule is shown below. Items marker is the project
schedule and Council Action items are noted with a CC:
CC Receive Feasibility report and Set Improvement Hearing October 26, 2022
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
4
CC Improvement Hearing, Order Improvement, and November 9, 2022
Authorize Preparation of Plans & Specifications
CC Approve Plans & Specifications, and January, 2023
Order Advertisement for Bid
Bid Opening February 2023
CC Award Contract March 2023
Construction Start Summer 2023
Substantial Completion Fall 2023
CC Set Assessment Hearing October 2023
CC Assessment Hearing October 2023
Recommendation
Based on the data within this report, the proposed 2023 Pavement Management Project, FH 23-01, is
feasible, necessary, cost-effective and will benefit the City of Falcon Heights.
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
5
PROJECT LOCATION
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
6
STREETS Existing Conditions
The approximately 1.4 miles of streets in the project area were originally paved between 1957-
1967. From historical aerial photos, Garden Avenue was originally a gravel section line road It was
widened to its current configuration in 1976. The last time the roadway
was resurfaced was in 1999. All streets have an urban design with
concrete curb and gutter and stormwater systems to convey drainage.
Holton Street, Albert Street, Sheldon Street and Ruggles Avenue are
residential streets. They are 31 feet wide, with parking allowed on both
sides. The speed limit for these streets is 20 mph and staff are not aware
of a speeding issue, nor have they received residents’ comments about
speeds.
Garden Avenue is a Municipal State Aid route and is classified as a minor
collector. From the Snelling Service Road to Holton Avenue it is 36 feet
wide with two lanes of traffic, parking on both sides, with parking restrictions in front of the
church. From Holton to Hamline the roadway transitions to a 42-foot-wide street with no parking
posted on the north side. parking restrictions in front of the school. between the school and
Holton Street and near the church on Holton Street. Garden Avenue has pavement markings that
are not consistent with the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) at the
intersection with Albert Street.
Garden Avenue has a school zone with a 20-mph speed limit and a 20-mph speed limit west of
Holton Street. The school zone speed limit is out of date since the City updated the posted speed
limit on Garden to 20 mph in 2021. Garden Avenue speed counts from May 2022 measure the
85th percentile speed at 27 mph near Simpson Street and 24 mph near Falcon Heights Elementary
School. The measured speeds represent a significant speeding issue although based on the new
speed limit. Staff has heard numerous resident concerns about speeding vehicles on Garden
Avenue.
Municipal State Aid (MSA) traffic counts taken in 2020, during the COVID-19 Pandemic, measured
610-620 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on Garden Avenue. Staff took additional counts in May of
2022 and measured 743-748 ADT (not seasonally adjusted by MnDOT Traffic). The MSA traffic
counts taken in 2017, pre-pandemic, measured 790-1050 ADT. Traffic volumes on Garden Avenue
appear to be increasing, but are not back to pre-pandemic volumes.
Pavement condition scores were considered to determine the streets for the City’s pavement
management and capital improvements plan. Falcon Heights’ pavement management system
utilizes a pavement condition index (PCI) rating of 0 to 100. This rating is based on surficial
pavement observations. Street condition ratings are divided into three categories: “adequate”
(66 to 100), “marginal” (36 to 65) and “problem” (0 to 35). The average PCI for Garden is 20. The
average PCI for the mill and overlay roads is 47.
Falcon Heights contracted with a geotechnical engineering consultant to obtain pavement borings
on Garden Avenue within the project. The observed pavement depth was generally 4 inches. The
Figure 1 - Non-Standard
Painted Cross-Hatch
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
7
thicker pavement observed at one of the borings was likely due to a roadway patch. Observed
aggregate base ranged from 4 to 7 inches. The fill encountered below the base consisted of sandy
soils. The geotechnical report indicated the pavement distresses on Garden Avenue may indicate
issues within the subgrade of the roadway. Slightly organic soils were encountered at one of the
locations 2-4 feet below the street surface. The fill contained some debris, including concrete and
bituminous. The existing pavement sections are summarized in the table below:
Measured Existing Pavement Sections Table
Boring
Location
Bituminous Pavement
Thickness (in.)
Apparent Aggregate
Base Thickness (in.)
ST-8 4 4
ST-9 4.5 7
ST-10 4 6
ST-11 7 5 Proposed Improvements
Area 1 Proposed Improvements - Mill and overlaying of the pavement is proposed as the method
of pavement construction. The process involves grinding off the top 2 inches of pavement and
replacing with two new inches of bituminous. This method is a cost-effective way to get a new
pavement surface that is smoother and free of defects. Although cracking is likely to mirror in the
year following construction, sealing cracks the following year is anticipated to address that issue
and maintain the pavement longevity. Cost for the street resurfacing is estimated at $427,000.
Area 2 Proposed Improvements - Falcon Heights contracted with a geotechnical engineering
consultant to obtain pavement borings on Garden Avenue. Based on the data and the minimal
utility work proposed with this project, a full-depth reclamation is proposed. This would include
grinding and mixing the existing pavement with the underlying base section. This strengthens the
base of the roadway. Excess grounds are removed and a new, 4-inch asphalt section would be
paved without changing the elevation of the roadway. Some areas may need subgrade correction
if unsuitable soils are encountered. The road is proposed to be striped with pavement markings
consistent with the MN MUTCD. Cost for the street reconstruction is estimated at $680,000
Area 2 Proposed Improvements Options
Segment 1, Snelling Service Road to Holton Avenue
• Option 1 (Existing Street Design)
o Street Width 36 Feet
o 11-foot Drive Lanes
o 7-foot Parking Lanes on Both Sides
o No Sidewalk
• Option 2 (Existing Street Design Modified)
o Street Width 36 Feet
o 11-foot Drive Lanes
o 8-foot Parking Lanes on South Side
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
8
o 6-foot shoulder on North Side, No Parking
o No Sidewalk
• Option 3 (Concept B modified)
o Street Width 34 Feet (Narrowed 2 Feet by Moving the North Curb)
o 11-foot Drive Lanes
o 7-foot Parking Lane on South Side
o 5-foot shoulder on North Side, No Parking
o No Sidewalk
• Option 4 (Concept A)
o Street Width 29 Feet (Narrowed 7 Feet by Moving the North Curb)
o 11-foot Drive Lanes
o 7-foot Parking Lane on South Side
o 7-foot Sidewalk on North Side, Next to the Curb
Segment 2, Holton Avenue to Hamline Avenue
• Option 5 (Existing Design)
o Street Width 42 Feet
o 12-foot Drive Lanes
o 9-foot Parking South Side Only
o 9-foot Shoulder North Side Currently Signed No Parking.
o No Sidewalk
• Option 6 (Concept G)
o Street Width 32-foot (Narrowed 10 Feet by Moving North Curb)
o 12-foot Drive Lanes
o 8-foot Parking South Side Only
o Elimination of North Shoulder Currently Signed No Parking.
o No Sidewalk
o East of School Property: North Side Shoulder for School Pick-Up Queuing, No
Sidewalk
• Option 7 (Concept F)
o Street Width 32-foot (Narrowed 10 Feet by Moving North Curb)
o 12-foot Drive Lanes
o 8-foot Parking South Side Only
o Elimination of North Shoulder Currently Signed No Parking.
o 6-foot Sidewalk
o 5-foot Boulevard Between Sidewalk and Curb Adjacent to the School Property
All options for reducing the street width involved moving in the north curb line. Garden Avenue
is currently 36 feet wide, much wider than the other streets in this neighborhood. The additional
width is likely contributing to faster speeds on Garden Avenue. Narrowed roadways can provide
more visual feedback for drivers to better interpret the speed they are traveling at, along with
feeling less comfortable at higher speeds.
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
9
Reduction of street width will result in some loss of parking. Based on staff observations and
resident feedback, there is ample parking even if one side of parking is eliminated. All options
leave at least one side with parking which as feedback received from residents.
A significant reduction of the street width without addition of a new sidewalk, such as Option 6
could eliminate current space used by walkers.
Pathways Existing Conditions
Area 1 and 2 – No pathways are located on the project streets in Area 1 or Area 2.
Ruggles Pedestrian Connection – The City has right-of-way parallel to Ruggles Street that is
currently used by residents on foot to cut through the neighborhood from Pascal Street to Holton
Street. The area is currently maintained by the residents on both sides as lawn, so it does not
meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards for accessibility. A utility pole is located in
the center of the right-of-way. The city has no formal count of usage but anecdotally it is relatively
well used during the summer. Proposed Improvements
Area 1 – No improvements are proposed.
Area 2
Segment 1
Option 4 identified under the STREETS segment is the only option for this segment that has a
dedicated separated pathway. This option provides a 7-foot concrete sidewalk behind the new
north curb line. Dedicated pathways such as this option provide a higher level of safety compared
to shared space within the roadway where pedestrians and bikers would use the parking lane or
shoulders. It defines where pedestrians should walk. The sidewalk is elevated behind a curb which
acts as a barrier. As long as the pathways are plowed in the winter, it provides a much safer space
as typically shoulders get reduced as snow builds up and pavement markings get hidden under
the snow. Estimated improvement cost is $172,000.
Area 2
Segment 2
Option 7 identified under the STREETS segment is the only option for this segment that has a
dedicated separated pathway. This option provides a 6-foot concrete sidewalk separated by a 5
foot boulevard behind the new north curb line. This option provides room for snow storage
between the curb and the sidewalk. Dedicated pathways such as this option provide a higher
level of safety compared to shared space within the roadway where pedestrians and bikers would
use the parking lane or shoulders. It defines where pedestrians should walk. The sidewalk is
elevated behind a curb which acts as a barrier. As long as the pathway are plowed in the winter,
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
10
it provides a much safer space as typically shoulders get reduced as snow builds up and pavement
markings get hidden under the snow. Estimated improvement cost is $127,000.
Council action has determined, if a pathway is installed with this project, costs would not be
assessed. This report assumes the funding would be split between Municipal State Aid and the
Street Fund. Ongoing maintenance, including snow removal would be performed by the City.
Ruggles Pedestrian Connection – An improvement to the Ruggles right-of-way was considered.
The pathway could be constructed as concrete with drain tile at an estimated cost of $35,000. A
second option would be permeable pavers, which allow stormwater to filter through the
pavement into the ground below to accommodate drainage. The estimated cost of a permeable
paver installation is $51,000. These estimated amounts include contingency and
engineering/overhead costs.
Due to significant opposition by the adjacent property owners and others living in the
neighborhood in addition to the low resident support heard from the neighborhood, current
usage of the connection and the cost of the improvement construction, the pathway is not
recommended. However, ongoing discussions are happening around this proposal as additional
meetings are occurring with neighbors. If a pathway were constructed, costs of the 2023 PMP
would increase by $35,000 to $51,000, funded from the street fund.
Sanitary Sewer Existing Conditions
The sanitary sewer system within the project streets was constructed in the 1950s and 1960s. All
of the sanitary pipe has been lined with Cure-In-Place-Pipe through the City’s sanitary sewer
rehabilitation program. This process creates a new pipe within the existing pipe. Proposed Improvements
The sanitary sewer manholes are proposed for minor rehabilitation work to include new, water-
tight castings and lids, new concrete rings and installation of an inflow and infiltration barrier at
the top of the manhole. These improvements are anticipated to reduce stormwater entering the
sanitary sewer system, which increases downstream capacity and treatment costs. They will also
reinforce the top of the manhole to prevent future settlements within the street. The cost
estimate for these improvements is $40,000.
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
11
Stormwater and Drainage Existing Conditions
The streets in the project area are served by catch basins which collect water on the street and
transport it to the east into Roseville. Storm sewer structures within the project area were
constructed with various materials including brick and mortar, concrete barrel sections seated on
top of pipe, and more conventional concrete structures. Catch basins on Garden Avenue are
located behind the curb line, which cause maintenance issues with keeping the drain open for
water in the winter and spring months. Staff inspected all storm structures to evaluate their
condition and determine replacement priorities.
The project area eventually flows east across the City line to a known flooding area, Gottfried Pit,
located in Roseville at Larpenteur Avenue and Fernwood Avenue. Gottfried Pit is a regional pond
that is owned by Ramsey County, and maintained by the City of Roseville. In extreme events, the
pond has flooded up to approximately the 912 elevation (approximately 16’ above the normal
water level). Proposed Improvements
Based on staff inspection, deteriorated catch basins will be rehabilitated or replaced as part of
the proposed project improvements. During design, catch basins may be added to alleviate
drainage issues or redundant catch basins may be eliminated.
Catch basins located behind the curbline on Garden Avenue are proposed to be removed or
converted and new catch basins are proposed within the curbline. If Option 1B is selected, catch
basins will be constructed within the north curbline relocation.
The cost estimate for these improvements is $242,000.
As the proposed street improvements would disturb an area greater than one acre, the project is
required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to include a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and use erosion and sediment control best practices during
construction, and obtain an MPCA Construction Permit. A watershed district erosion and
sediment control permit will also be required.
The proposed improvements would not add enough impervious surface that would trigger
watershed district quality or quantity requirements. Option 1B, to narrow the roadway, would
reduce impervious surface in the area, reducing stormwater conveyed downstream to Gottfried
Pit. No improvements for stormwater treatment are proposed with this project.
RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS
These project improvements are proposed within the existing right-of-way. No right-of-way or easement
acquisition is anticipated.
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
12
If the Ruggles Street right-of-way between Pascal Street and Holton Street is not going to be improved to
be an ADA-compliant pathway, the Council may consider vacation of the right-of-way. Failure of Falcon
Heights to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act on a travel-way within City right-
of-way may be a liability for the City. Vacation or turning-back the right-of-way may be appropriate to
address the liability concerns.
The vacation process is prescribed by Minnesota State Statute as a discretionary act of the Council. It can
be initiated by the City and approved by City Council with a four-fifths majority at a public hearing. Prior
to the hearing, notice must be sent to affected property owners and notice posted and published in the
City newspaper. The right-of-way area at issue is not land owned by the City. It is a platted right-of-way
easement over land. A vacation process would remove the City’s right-of-way easement over the
property, “turning back” the property to the underlying property at no cost to them. The property would
then be available for their use and enjoyment. The property would also be returned to the tax roll.
OUTSIDE AGENCY COORDINATION
The watermain system that services the project area is owned and operated by St. Paul Regional Water
Services and they have indicated no improvements are planned for inclusion or coordination with this
project.
The project area is within the Capitol Region Watershed District. Proposed improvements are not
anticipated to warrant any stormwater requirements from the District.
During the design process, staff will do a Gopher State One Call for the project area to identify all small
utility operators. The City will coordinate with small utilities to finalize relocates and other coordination
items during design.
ESTIMATED COSTS AND PROPOSED FUNDING
Proposed project costs for the 2023 PMP Improvement Project are summarized below. The cost estimate
is based on recent construction projects of similar character and assumes that the proposed
improvements would begin in 2023. All costs include estimated engineering costs and 15% contingency,
which includes unforeseen costs including inflation, unforeseen site conditions, etc. Actual costs will be
determined through competitive bids following final design for the project. The actual costs will be
dependent upon the market conditions that exist at the time of the bidding.
The proposed street improvements are eligible for assessments according to the City of Falcon Heights
Assessment Policy. Per City Policy, a portion of the street improvements will be assessed to the
benefitting properties. Along with assessments, street costs will be financed through the Street
Infrastructure Fund and Municipal State Aid. Typically, only roads that have been added to the City’s
Municipal State Aid system (MSA) are eligible for funding through the City’s portion of state gas tax
revenues. However, the City of Falcon Heights has a Certified Municipal State Aid Street system. As a
result, the City can use MSA funds to pay for the City’s portion of the costs.
Storm sewer and sanitary sewer improvements will be funded from the appropriate infrastructure fund,
and are not eligible for assessments.
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
13
Estimated
Cost MSA
Street
Infrastructure
Funds
Assessments
Sanitary
Sewer
Fund
Storm Sewer
Fund
Street
Improvements –
Area 1
$427,000 $117,000 $117,000 $193,000 - -
Street
Improvements –
Area 2: Garden Ave
$680,000 $170,000 $170,000 $340,000 - -
Storm Sewer
Improvements $242,000 - $242,000
Sanitary Sewer
Improvements $40,000 $40,000 -
Total $ 1,389,000 $287,000 $287,000 $533,000 $40,000 $242,000
*Includes 15% Engineering
If a pathway is installed with this project, the Council has directed staff not to assess project costs. This
report assumes the funding for pathway improvements would be split between Municipal State Aid
Funding and the Street Infrastructure Fund. This is consistent with past practice; the City did not assess
for pathway replacement along Roselawn Avenue in 2015. The table below shows the estimated costs
with contingency and funding for the pathway options.
Estimated
Cost MSA Street Infrastructure
Funds Assessments
Options 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
No Pathway Improvements $0 - - -
Option 4 $172,000 $86,000 - -
Option 7 $127,000 $127,000 - -
Option 4 and 7 $299,000 $299,000 - -
No Pathway at Ruggles
Right-of-Way $0 - - -
Ruggles: 5-Foot Concrete Pathway $35,000 - $35,000
Ruggles: Permeable Pavers $51,000 - $51,000 -
*Includes 15% Engineering
PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS
Assessments will be levied to the benefitting properties as outlined in Minnesota State Statute Chapter
429 and the City’s Assessment Policy, which is summarized below. The assessed amount is levied on a
front footage basis. Residential corner lots are assessed 100% for the long side, 0% for the short side.
One alteration proposed to the policy considers the long, narrow lots between Albert Street and Hamline
Avenue. Tax-exempt lots are assessed for all frontages. To be consistent with the assessment practice
used on the 2015 PMP, which also included a lot with significant length, residential lot depth is proposed
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
14
to be capped at 176 feet. This would affect two lots lowering their assessible frontage from 296 feet to
176 feet.
Assuming this project is completed by fall 2023, the final assessment amount would be determined at an
assessment hearing in the fall of 2023 with a thorough review of the proposed assessments by the Council.
The Council would also set the length of assessments and the interest rate at the hearing. In past projects,
the assessments have been over 7 years for mill and overlay projects and 10 years for reconstruction
projects at an interest rate 2% above the current rate of return on the City’s portfolio.
The following factors regarding the City of Falcon Heights assessment policies should be considered:
• The properties owned by the Falcon Heights UCC are tax-exempt parcels, and have been included in
the preliminary assessment roll as such. The City may choose to pursue a benefit appraisal on the
properties to ensure the assessment proposed does not exceed the estimated benefit to the
property, as required by Minnesota State Statute 429. This may result in a higher City cost, which
could be offset by using additional State Aid funds. Staff will update the City Council as information
becomes available.
• Garden Avenue assessments are higher than they would be for a similar project on a north-south
street due to the orientation of the lots. The majority of the adjacent lots have their long side on
Garden Avenue. This means they were not assessed for the improvements to the street on their
short side, but, in accordance with the assessment policy, they will have a long assessable frontage. Area 1 – Holton Street, Albert Street, Sheldon Street, Ruggles Avenue
This area includes 8,705 feet of frontage, 504 feet of which is not assessable due to corner lots.
There are 96 parcels eligible for assessment. The average residential assessment is estimated at
$1,495.34. The estimated assessment rates are shown below:
• Residential (40% of the improvement cost) = $19.62/ft
• Tax-Exempt (100% of the improvement cost) = $49.05/ft Area 2 – Garden Avenue
This area includes 4,241 feet of frontage, 553 feet of which is not assessable due to corner lots.
There are 22 parcels eligible for assessment. The average residential assessment is estimated at
$8,844.57. The estimated assessment rates are shown below:
• Residential (40% of the improvement cost) = $64.14/ft
• Tax-Exempt (100% of the improvement cost) = $160.34/ft
No assessments are proposed for funding pathways, if constructed.
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
The City hosted two open houses for the Northeast Quadrant as a whole, on April 5, 2022 and July 20,
2022, to discuss the Ruggles Street pathway proposal and Garden Avenue. These open houses were
widely attended by both residents adjacent to the proposed improvements and also residents from other
Northeast Quadrant streets. Layouts with project concepts were available for viewing and discussion.
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
15
The residents expressed concerned about assessment cost, snow maintenance and impact on their yard
of the pathway options. Several residents who live on Garden Avenue didn’t see a need for a sidewalk as
people currently walk on the street. Residents had concerns about speeding on Garden Avenue. They
also expressed desire to have parking on Garden Avenue. Comments received are summarized and
written comments are attached in the Appendix.
An informational meeting was held on October 5, 2022 for residents who live adjacent to the project
streets and Ruggles pathway option. Approximately 10 people attended. The meeting was presentation
format, where staff presented information on the City’s Pavement Management Program, the proposed
improvements, and the City’s Assessment Policy. Residents asked clarifying questions about the City’s
assessment policy, the history of Garden Avenue, and about pedestrian facilities. As Garden Avenue was
proposed for improvement in 2015, a Garden Avenue resident asked why they should bear a higher
assessment cost for construction in 2023.
PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
If this project is approved, the proposed project schedule is shown below. Items marker is the project
schedule and Council Action items are noted with a CC:
CC Receive Feasibility report and Set Improvement Hearing October 26, 2022
CC Improvement Hearing, Order Improvement, and November 9, 2022
Authorize Preparation of Plans & Specifications
CC Approve Plans & Specifications, and January, 2023
Order Advertisement for Bid
Bid Opening February 2023
CC Award Contract March 2023
Construction Start Summer 2023
Substantial Completion Fall 2023
CC Set Assessment Hearing October 2023
CC Assessment Hearing October 2023
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the information and analysis included in this report, the 2023 Street Rehabilitation Project,
FH 23-01, is feasible, necessary and cost effective. The following is recommended:
1. The Falcon Heights City Council accept this feasibility study and report and order public hearing
for November 9, 2022.
2. After receiving the appropriate staff reports, information and input from the public hearing, the
City Council shall:
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
16
a. Determine whether to proceed with or reject the proposed public improvements;
b. Determine which Garden Avenue pathway option to proceed with or reject;
c. Determine the roadway width of Garden Avenue; and
d. Determine Ruggles Avenue pathway option to proceed with or reject.
3. Based on the outcome of the public hearing, the Council can order the proposed improvements
and authorize the preparation of plans and specifications.
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
17
APPENDIX 1: IMPROVEMENT MAPS
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
18
APPENDIX 2: PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTIONS
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
19
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
20
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
21
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
22
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
23
APPENDIX 3: PUBLIC COMMENT SUMMARY
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
24
APPENDIX 4: OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
25
APPENDIX 5: DRAFT ASSESSMENT ROLLS
[ON FOLLOWING PAGES]
ParcelID BuildingNu StreetName StreetSuff Front Footage LandmarkBu TaxExemptYN Assessment Rate Assessment Amount
152923310108 1393 GARDEN AVE 665 Falcon Heights Elementary Sch Y 49.05$ 32,618.25$
152923340131 1411 LARPENTEUR AVE 140 N 19.62$ 2,746.80$
152923310044 1436 ROSELAWN AVE 162 N 19.62$ 3,178.44$
152923340130 1695 HOLTON ST 126 N 19.62$ 2,472.12$
152923340065 1700 HOLTON ST 80 N 19.62$ 1,569.60$
152923340128 1701 HOLTON ST 80 N 19.62$ 1,569.60$
152923340066 1706 HOLTON ST 63 N 19.62$ 1,236.06$
152923340097 1707 HOLTON ST 68 N 19.62$ 1,334.16$
152923340067 1712 HOLTON ST 63 N 19.62$ 1,236.06$
152923340096 1713 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340095 1717 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340068 1718 HOLTON ST 63 N 19.62$ 1,236.06$
152923340094 1723 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340069 1724 HOLTON ST 63 N 19.62$ 1,236.06$
152923340093 1729 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340070 1732 HOLTON ST 63 N 19.62$ 1,236.06$
152923340092 1735 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340120 1740 HOLTON ST 69 N 19.62$ 1,353.78$
152923340091 1741 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340121 1746 HOLTON ST 69 N 19.62$ 1,353.78$
152923340090 1747 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340089 1753 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340073 1754 HOLTON ST 63 Posel Communications Inc N 19.62$ 1,236.06$
152923340074 1756 HOLTON ST 63 N 19.62$ 1,236.06$
152923340088 1757 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340087 1765 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340075 1766 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340076 1770 HOLTON ST 56 N 19.62$ 1,098.72$
152923340086 1771 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340085 1775 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340077 1776 HOLTON ST 73 N 19.62$ 1,432.26$
152923340078 1782 HOLTON ST 63 N 19.62$ 1,236.06$
152923340084 1783 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340079 1790 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340083 1791 HOLTON ST 60 N 19.62$ 1,177.20$
152923340082 1795 HOLTON ST 126 United Church Falcon Heights Y 49.05$ 6,180.30$
152923310111 1795 HOLTON ST 322 Y 49.05$ 15,794.10$
152923340080 1796 HOLTON ST 63 N 19.62$ 1,236.06$
152923310078 1816 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310077 1820 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310076 1824 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310075 1830 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310074 1834 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310061 1835 HOLTON ST 75 N 19.62$ 1,471.50$
152923310062 1843 HOLTON ST 75 N 19.62$ 1,471.50$
152923310073 1844 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310107 1849 HAMLINE AVE 125 N 19.62$ 2,452.50$
152923310063 1849 HOLTON ST 75 N 19.62$ 1,471.50$
152923310072 1850 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310071 1852 HOLTON ST 133 N 19.62$ 2,609.46$
152923310064 1857 HOLTON ST 75 N 19.62$ 1,471.50$
152923310033 1863 ALBERT ST 145 N 19.62$ 2,844.90$
152923310017 1863 SHELDON ST 137 N 19.62$ 2,687.94$
152923310018 1864 ALBERT ST 123 N 19.62$ 2,413.26$
152923310034 1864 HOLTON ST 133 N 19.62$ 2,609.46$
152923310009 1864 SHELDON ST 139 N 19.62$ 2,727.18$
152923310091 1865 HAMLINE AVE 123 N 19.62$ 2,413.26$
152923310065 1865 HOLTON ST 75 N 19.62$ 1,471.50$
152923310035 1868 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310032 1869 ALBERT ST 77 N 19.62$ 1,510.74$
152923310066 1869 HOLTON ST 75 N 19.62$ 1,471.50$
152923310016 1869 SHELDON ST 77 N 19.62$ 1,510.74$
152923310019 1870 ALBERT ST 77 N 19.62$ 1,510.74$
152923310008 1870 SHELDON ST 77 N 19.62$ 1,510.74$
152923310036 1874 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310031 1877 ALBERT ST 72 N 19.62$ 1,412.64$
152923310067 1877 HOLTON ST 75 N 19.62$ 1,471.50$
152923310015 1877 SHELDON ST 77 N 19.62$ 1,510.74$
152923310020 1878 ALBERT ST 75 N 19.62$ 1,471.50$
152923310007 1878 SHELDON ST 77 N 19.62$ 1,510.74$
152923310037 1880 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310068 1881 HOLTON ST 75 N 19.62$ 1,471.50$
152923310030 1883 ALBERT ST 79 N 19.62$ 1,549.98$
152923310014 1883 SHELDON ST 76 N 19.62$ 1,491.12$
152923310021 1884 ALBERT ST 77 N 19.62$ 1,510.74$
152923310006 1884 SHELDON ST 76 N 19.62$ 1,491.12$
152923310038 1886 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310013 1889 SHELDON ST 77 N 19.62$ 1,510.74$
152923310029 1891 ALBERT ST 77 N 19.62$ 1,510.74$
152923310069 1891 HOLTON ST 75 N 19.62$ 1,471.50$
152923310022 1892 ALBERT ST 76 N 19.62$ 1,491.12$
152923310039 1892 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310005 1892 SHELDON ST 77 N 19.62$ 1,510.74$
152923310023 1896 ALBERT ST 77 N 19.62$ 1,510.74$
152923310040 1896 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310004 1896 SHELDON ST 76 N 19.62$ 1,491.12$
152923310028 1897 ALBERT ST 76 N 19.62$ 1,491.12$
152923310070 1897 HOLTON ST 75 N 19.62$ 1,471.50$
152923310012 1897 SHELDON ST 76 N 19.62$ 1,491.12$
152923310027 1905 ALBERT ST 77 N 19.62$ 1,510.74$
152923310011 1905 SHELDON ST 76 N 19.62$ 1,491.12$
152923310024 1906 ALBERT ST 77 N 19.62$ 1,510.74$
152923310041 1906 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310003 1906 SHELDON ST 77 N 19.62$ 1,510.74$
152923310042 1910 HOLTON ST 62 N 19.62$ 1,216.44$
152923310043 1914 HOLTON ST 64 N 19.62$ 1,255.68$
Non-Assessed Frontage504
Total Garden Ave Frontage 8705 Feet Total Assessment 193,659.21$
Residential Footage 7088 Feet 139,066.56$
Tax-Exempt Footage 1113 Feet 54,592.65$
ParcelID BuildingNuStreetName StreetSuff Front Footage LandmarkBu TaxExemptY Shape_Area Assessment Rate Assessment Amount
152923340082 1795 HOLTON ST 269 United Church Falcon Heights Y 3144.587721 160.34$ 43,131.46$
152923340081 1800 HOLTON ST 133 N 814.603913 64.14$ 8,530.62$
152923340045 1801 ALBERT ST 136 N 795.0729334 64.14$ 8,723.04$
152923340044 1800 ALBERT ST 176 N 1883.353773 64.14$ 11,288.64$
152923340001 1803 HAMLINE AVE 176 N 1432.801041 64.14$ 11,288.64$
152923330088 1802 ASBURY ST 134 N 773.9533434 64.14$ 8,594.76$
152923330060 1803 ARONA ST 134 N 771.0093924 64.14$ 8,594.76$
152923330059 1802 ARONA ST 134 N 766.7522857 64.14$ 8,594.76$
152923330031 1803 SIMPSON ST 134 N 763.8091285 64.14$ 8,594.76$
152923330030 1802 SIMPSON ST 134 N 759.5542827 64.14$ 8,594.76$
152923330001 1803 PASCAL ST 133 N 754.2643167 64.14$ 8,530.62$
152923320108 1810 SIMPSON ST 134 N 727.9478677 64.14$ 8,594.76$
152923320107 1811 PASCAL ST 133 N 728.2853416 64.14$ 8,530.62$
152923320088 1810 ARONA ST 134 N 721.2236725 64.14$ 8,594.76$
152923320087 1811 SIMPSON ST 134 N 723.9678764 64.14$ 8,594.76$
152923320069 1808 ASBURY ST 134 N 714.4960799 64.14$ 8,594.76$
152923320068 1811 ARONA ST 134 N 717.2410744 64.14$ 8,594.76$
152923310111 1795 HOLTON ST 134 Y 4016.612118 160.34$ 21,485.56$
152923310108 1393 GARDEN AVE 665 Falcon Heights Elementary Sch Y 35452.41886 160.34$ 106,626.10$
152923310101 1807 HAMLINE AVE 126 N 957.3236552 64.14$ 8,081.64$
152923310079 1810 HOLTON ST 133 N 794.823746 64.14$ 8,530.62$
152923310059 1806 PASCAL ST 134 N 1207.738902 64.14$ 8,594.76$
Non-Assessable Frontage 553
Total Garden Ave Frontage 4241 Feet Total Assessment 339,289.92$
Residential Footage 2620 Feet 168,046.80$
Tax-Exempt Footage 1068 Feet 171,243.12$
Note: Parcel depth is capped at 176 feet, applies to 1800 Albert St. and 1803 Hamline Ave.
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
26
APPENDIX 6: DRAFT ASSESSSMENT MAPS
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
27
2023 Pavement Management Project October 26, 2023 Feasibility Report
28
APPENDIX 7: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
[ON FOLLOWING PAGES]
Geotechnical Evaluation Report
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement Management
Falcon Heights, Minnesota
Prepared for
City of Falcon Heights
Professional Certification:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Richard S. Jett, PE
Project Engineer
License Number: 58781
June 13, 2022
Project B2203417
Braun Intertec Corporation
AA/EOE
Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438
Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com
June 13, 2022 Project B2203417
Stephanie Smith, PE
City of Falcon Heights
2077 Larpenteur Avenue West
Falcon Heights, MN 55113
Re: Geotechnical Evaluation Report
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement Management
Falcon Heights, Minnesota
Dear Ms. Smith:
We are pleased to present this Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the above-referenced project. The
following report provides the results of our evaluation and should be read in its entirety.
Thank you for making Braun Intertec your geotechnical consultant for this project. If you have questions
about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of our work to date, please
contact Richard Jett at 815.545.7059 (rjett@braunintertec.com) or Josh Kirk at 507.514.1348
(jkirk@braunintertec.com)
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
Richard S. Jett, PE
Project Engineer
Joshua L. Kirk, PE
Account Leader, Senior Engineer
Table of Contents
Description Page
A. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
A.1. Project Description .............................................................................................................. 1
A.2. Current Roadway Designations ........................................................................................... 2
A.3. Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3
A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents .......................................................... 3
A.5. Scope of Services ................................................................................................................. 3
B. Results .............................................................................................................................................. 4
B.1. Geologic Overview .............................................................................................................. 4
B.2. Visual Field Observations .................................................................................................... 4
B.3. Existing Pavement Sections ................................................................................................. 5
B.4. Boring Results ...................................................................................................................... 6
B.5. Groundwater ....................................................................................................................... 7
B.6. Laboratory Test Results ....................................................................................................... 7
C. Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 8
C.1. Design and Construction Discussion ................................................................................... 8
C.1.a. Understanding of Project Scope ............................................................................. 8
C.1.b. General Pavement Conditions................................................................................ 8
C.1.c. Observations of Subgrade Soils .............................................................................. 8
C.1.d. Pavement Improvement Options ........................................................................... 8
C.2. Pavement Improvement Recommendations ...................................................................... 9
C.2.a. Pavement Improvement Approach – Falcon Woods Area (ST-1 through ST-7) ..... 9
C.2.b. Pavement Improvement Approach – Garden Avenue Area (ST-8 through ST-11)10
C.3. Site Grading and Excavations ............................................................................................ 11
C.3.a. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction .......................................................... 11
C.4. Pavements ......................................................................................................................... 12
C.4.a. Pavement Subgrade Preparation – Full Reconstruction ...................................... 12
C.4.b. Proofroll Observations ......................................................................................... 13
C.4.c. Design Sections .................................................................................................... 13
C.4.d. Bituminous Pavement Materials .......................................................................... 14
C.4.e. Subgrade Drainage ............................................................................................... 14
C.4.f. Performance and Maintenance ........................................................................... 14
D. Procedures ...................................................................................................................................... 14
D.1. Penetration Test Borings ................................................................................................... 14
D.2. Exploration Logs ................................................................................................................ 15
D.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets ............................................................................................. 15
D.2.b. Geologic Origins ................................................................................................... 15
D.3. Material Classification and Testing ................................................................................... 15
D.3.a. Visual and Manual Classification .......................................................................... 15
D.3.b. Laboratory Testing ............................................................................................... 15
D.4. Groundwater Measurements ............................................................................................ 15
E. Qualifications .................................................................................................................................. 16
E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions .................................................................................. 16
E.1.a. Material Strata ..................................................................................................... 16
E.1.b. Groundwater Levels ............................................................................................. 16
E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility .......................................................................... 16
Table of Contents (continued)
Description Page
E.2.a. Plan Review .......................................................................................................... 16
E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing ............................................................... 17
E.3. Use of Report ..................................................................................................................... 17
E.4. Standard of Care ................................................................................................................ 17
Appendix
Soil Boring Location Sketch
Log of Boring Sheets ST-1 through ST-11
Pavement Core Photographs
Descriptive Terminology of Soil
A. Introduction
A.1. Project Description
This Geotechnical Evaluation Report addresses the planned improvements to select roadways located in
Falcon Heights, Minnesota. Tables 1 and 2 below provide a summary of project details.
Table 1. Falcon Woods Area (Borings ST-1 through ST-7)
Aspect Description
Streets Included Autumn Street, Summer Street, Prior Avenue, Moore
Street, Howell Street, and Garden Avenue.
Pavement Type Bituminous pavement with aggregate base layer
Assumed Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT)* 600 or less
Estimated ESAL’s 230,000*
*Assumed value over a 20-year period.
Table 2. Garden Avenue Area (ST-8 through ST-11)
Aspect Description
Streets Included Garden Avenue from Hamline Avenue to Snelling
Avenue
Pavement Type Bituminous pavement with aggregate base layer
Assumed Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT)* 1000
Estimated ESAL’s 380,000*
*Assumed value over a 20-year period.
The figure below shows an illustration outlining where pavement improvements are planned.
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 2
Figure 1. Street Improvement Layout
Figure furnished by the City of Roseville and dated March 8, 2022.
A.2. Current Roadway Designations
Garden Avenue, between Hamline Avenue and Snelling Avenue, is classified as an urban minor collector
with an Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) ranging from 600 to 1000. The Falcon Woods neighborhood
roadways, including Autumn Street, Summer Street, Prior Avenue, Moore Steet, Howell Street, and
Garden Avenue (from Moore Street to Howell Street) are classified as residential roadways with an AADT
of less than 600.
Falcon Woods Area (ST-1 through ST-7)
Garden Avenue Area (ST-8 through ST-11)
↑ N
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 3
A.3. Purpose
The purpose of our geotechnical evaluation was to core the existing pavement, characterize the
subsurface soil conditions at selected exploration locations, evaluate their impact on the project, and
provide geotechnical recommendations for use in the design and rehabilitation of the selected roadways.
A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents
We reviewed the following information:
Proposed 2023 Pavement Management Map, furnished by the City of Roseville and dated
March 8, 2022.
In addition to the provided source, we have used several publicly available sources of information
including topography maps obtained from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnTOPO
website) and Google Earth aerial photographs.
We have described our understanding of the proposed construction and site to the extent others
reported it to us. Depending on the extent of available information, we may have made assumptions
based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the
project details, the project team should notify us. New or changed information could require additional
evaluation, analyses and/or recommendations.
A.5. Scope of Services
We performed our scope of services for the project in accordance with our Proposal for a Geotechnical
Evaluation (QTB156087) dated April 4, 2022. The following list describes the geotechnical tasks
completed in accordance with our authorized scope of services.
Reviewing the background information and reference documents previously cited.
Staking and coordinating clearing the exploration location of underground utilities. The City
of Falcon Heights selected and we staked/marked the new exploration locations in the field.
We acquired the surface elevations and locations with GPS technology using the State of
Minnesota’s permanent GPS base station network. The Soil Boring Location Sketch included
in the Appendix shows the approximate locations of the borings.
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 4
Performing 11 standard penetration test (SPT) borings, denoted as ST-1 through ST-11, to
nominal depths of 5 feet below grade across the site.
Core the pavement at each boring location for a total of eleven pavement cores.
Performing laboratory testing on select samples to aid in soil classification and engineering
analysis.
Preparing this report containing a boring location sketch, logs of soil borings, a summary of
the soils encountered, results of laboratory tests, and recommendations for
reconstruction/rehabilitation of the existing roadways and pavement design thicknesses.
Our scope of services did not include environmental services or testing and our geotechnical personnel
performing this evaluation are not trained to provide environmental services or testing. We can provide
environmental services or testing at your request.
B. Results
B.1. Geologic Overview
We based the geologic origins used in this report on the soil types, laboratory testing, and available
common knowledge of the geological history of the site. Because of the complex depositional history,
geologic origins can be difficult to ascertain. We did not perform a detailed investigation of the geologic
history for the site.
B.2. Visual Field Observations
We performed a site visit to visually observe the conditions of the existing pavements across both project
areas following completion of the field work and laboratory testing. Visual observations, in combination
with the results of the geotechnical evaluation, can offer additional insight into the subgrade conditions
in areas where soil borings were not completed. In addition, these visual observations of the existing
pavements can help determine the practicality of different rehabilitation options and how the previous
pavement section has held up since its previous improvements.
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 5
In the Falcon Woods area (Borings ST-1 through ST-7), significant surface distress in the form of surface
cracks and some raveling was observed throughout the entire project area. In general, minimal amounts
of potholes and rutting were observed with localized areas exhibiting more distress, specifically rutting
along Summer Street between Prior Avenue and Howell Street and potholes near the intersection of
Howell Street and Prior Avenue. The roadways showed previous signs of maintenance, including
bituminous patches and sealed surface cracks.
The Garden Avenue project area (ST-8 through ST-11) showed significant signs of distress in the form of
surface cracks and raveling with occasional potholes throughout. Rutting was observed throughout the
project area but was more heavily concentrated on the western half of Garden Avenue. The roadway
showed previous signs of maintenance, including bituminous patches and sealed surface cracks. The
adjacent curb and gutter also showed signs of distress in the form of settlement.
B.3. Existing Pavement Sections
Table 3 below outlines the existing pavement section thicknesses that were encountered during our
geotechnical exploration.
Table 3. Existing Pavement Section Profile
Boring Location
In Place Measured Bituminous Pavement Thickness
(in)
In-Place Measured Apparent Aggregate Base Thickness
(in)
ST-1 3 1/2 5
ST-2 3 1/2 7
ST-3 4 5
ST-4 4 1/2 5
ST-5 3 5 1/2
ST-6 3 5 1/2
ST-7 4 4
ST-8 4 4
ST-9 4 1/2 7
ST-10 4 6
ST-11 7 5
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 6
We did not perform gradation analysis on the apparent aggregate base material encountered as part of
the pavement section, in accordance with our scope of work. Therefore, we cannot conclusively
determine if the encountered material satisfies a particular specification.
B.4. Boring Results
Tables 4 and 5 provides a summary of the soil boring results in the general order we encountered the
strata. Please refer to the Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix for additional details. The Descriptive
Terminology sheets in the Appendix include definitions of abbreviations used in Tables 4 and 5.
Table 4. Subsurface Profile Summary – Falcon Woods Area (Borings ST-1 through ST-7)
Strata
Soil Type -
ASTM
Classification
N values
Blows Per Foot
(BPF) Commentary and Details
Pavement
section N/A N/A
Observed bituminous pavement thicknesses
ranged from 3 to 4 inches.
Apparent aggregate base thicknesses ranged
from 4 to 7 inches.
Total pavement section thicknesses ranged from
8 to 10 1/2 inches.
Fill SM, SP-SM, SC 7 to 40 BPF
Observed below the pavement sections and
extended to the termination depths of the
borings.
Consisted of sandy soils at our exploration
locations.
Moisture conditions were generally moist.
Seams of clay soils were encountered in Borings
ST-2, ST-5, and ST-7.
Highly variable, soils intermixed.
Existing fill contained variable amounts of debris, including concrete and bituminous.
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 7
Table 5. Subsurface Profile Summary – Garden Avenue Area (ST-8 through St-11)
Strata
Soil Type -
ASTM
Classification
N values
Blows Per Foot (BPF Commentary and Details
Pavement
section N/A N/A
Observed bituminous pavement thicknesses
ranged from 4 to 7 inches.
Apparent aggregate base thicknesses ranged
from 4 to 7 inches.
Total pavement section thicknesses ranged from
8 to 12 inches.
The thicker bituminous pavement encountered at
Boring ST-11 is likely due to a boring being
completed within a previously patched pothole.
Fill SM, SP-SM 9 to 50 BPF
Observed below the pavement sections and
extended to the termination depths of the
borings.
Fill consisted of sandy soils.
Moisture conditions were generally moist.
Slightly organic fill soils were encountered in
boring ST-11 at a depth ranging from
approximately 2 to 4 feet below existing grade.
Existing fill contained variable amounts of debris, including concrete debris.
For simplicity in this report, we define existing fill to mean existing, uncontrolled, or undocumented fill.
B.5. Groundwater
We did not observe groundwater while advancing our borings. Therefore, it appears that groundwater is
below the depths explored. Project planning should anticipate seasonal and annual fluctuations of
groundwater. Should a more accurate determination of groundwater be needed, we recommend the
completion of additional soil borings and the installation of piezometers.
B.6. Laboratory Test Results
The boring logs show the results of the laboratory testing we performed next to the tested sample depth.
The moisture content of select fill soil samples ranged from 3 to 14 percent moisture by weight. Sieve
analysis tests (passing the No. 200 sieve only) performed on select fill soil samples indicated between
5 to 44 percent particles passing the No. 200 sieve by weight. Organic content tests performed on select
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 8
samples indicated between 1 to 2 percent organic material, by weight. These percentages classify the
material as non- to slightly organic.
C. Recommendations
C.1. Design and Construction Discussion
C.1.a. Understanding of Project Scope
Based on the provided request for proposal dated March 28, 2022, we understand that the City of Falcon
Heights is considering cost efficient improvements to the project areas consisting of pavement
rehabilitation options and possible reconstruction should the conditions warrant. We assume there will
likely not be any utility improvements or large-scale subgrade improvements planned during these
improvement projects. We expect that pavement rehabilitation options will be the first choice of the City
of Falcon Heights.
C.1.b. General Pavement Conditions
Generally, pavement distress observed throughout the project site appears to be in the form of alligator
cracking, some potholes, etc. Some rutting was observed in the Falcon Woods neighborhood but on a
relatively minor scale. More significant rutting was observed in the Garden Avenue area. Both project
areas showed previous signs of maintenance, including bituminous patches and sealed surface cracks.
C.1.c. Observations of Subgrade Soils
Subgrade soils in the Falcon Woods project area generally consisted of sandy fill subgrade soils with some
zones of clay-based soils observed. The Garden Avenue project area generally contained sandy subgrade
fill soils. Some debris, including concrete and bituminous, was encountered across both project areas.
Based on the soil boring samples, the subgrade soils contain minimal organic material within the
explored depths.
C.1.d. Pavement Improvement Options
Several options are available for pavement improvement. One option available is full reconstruction,
which includes full removal of the existing pavement section, preparation of the subgrade soils (as
needed), and placement of a new pavement section. Other options available include Full-Depth
Reclamation (FDR), or mill and overlay techniques, which utilize the reuse of the existing pavement to
reconstruct a new pavement section. These approaches do not include full removal of the existing
pavement section and limits the opportunity to observe and improve the subgrade soils.
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 9
While the latter two approaches tend to be more economical, there is a small risk that unforeseen
deficiencies in the existing subgrade may lead to future pavement impacts. If subgrade performance is
expected to be an issue in the future, rehabilitation options may not be practical or economical to
perform and will likely not provide the highest quality pavement over the long term.
If observation of the existing subgrade soils are a priority, we recommend reconstruction of the existing
pavement section. This option would provide the highest quality pavement over the longest possible
service life but is typically more expensive than other rehabilitation options. We would recommend the
existing bituminous pavement and aggregate base layers be removed, the existing subgrade
recompacted and minor soil corrections performed as needed, and a new pavement section, including
bituminous and aggregate base, be placed.
C.2. Pavement Improvement Recommendations
The following sections provide our recommendations for each of the proposed improvement areas
discussed in the RFP. In addition to our recommended approach, we understand there may be cost
implications to the city. We encourage the city to investigate multiple approaches to improving the
pavements, while understanding that each approach has a slightly different life cycle and subsequent
maintenance cycle. While one approach may be the most cost-effective in the short term, the
maintenance program may be more involved and have higher cost in the future.
C.2.a. Pavement Improvement Approach – Falcon Woods Area (ST-1 through ST-7)
Based on the results of our exploration, it appears that the existing pavement has reached the end of its
lifespan. Based on the type of distress noted in the pavements, and the results of our subsurface
exploration, it appears that the existing subgrade is generally sandy in nature and does not appear to be
in need of major improvement. Therefore, pavement improvement techniques such as a mill and overlay,
or a full-depth reclamation are feasible options. As noted previously, these techniques do not allow for
observations of the underlying subgrade soils and improvements to the subgrade. The design team
should analyze the cost and practicality associated with each option and choose the option that will best
suit the budget, schedule, lifespan, and performance standards for the project. These options will often
require more frequent maintenance compared with a full pavement reconstruction but are typically
more cost effective during construction.
To perform an FDR of the existing pavements, the full thickness of the existing asphalt is pulverized and
blended with a portion of the existing apparent aggregate base to form a new base layer for future
asphalt placement. We recommend leaving a nominal section of the existing aggregate base layer in
place so the underlying subgrade soils are not incorporated into the reclaimed material. The table below
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 10
provides recommended reclamation depths based on the borings performed. Note that pavement
section thicknesses are likely to vary, so the contractor should be observing their reclamation during
construction and making any necessary adjustments.
Table 6. Anticipated reclamation depths for FDR
Boring Anticipated Depth (inches)
ST-1 6
ST-2 8
ST-3 7
ST-4 7
ST-5 6
ST-6 6
ST-7 6
We recommend that a minimum of 2 inches of aggregate base is left into place during reclamation
operations. The contractor should make efforts to not reclaim the entire existing pavement section and
disturb the underlying subgrade soils during reclamation operations.
FDR is typically more cost efficient to perform as compared to full reconstruction and will eliminate the
existing near-surface distresses. We recommend a proofroll is performed once the reclaimed material is
at pavement elevations. If areas of unsuitable soils are encountered, it may be difficult, but achievable to
perform soil corrections; however the contractor will need to remove and store the reclaimed material to
perform any subgrade corrections.
C.2.b. Pavement Improvement Approach – Garden Avenue Area (ST-8 through ST-11)
Based on the results of our exploration, it appears that the existing pavement has reached the end of its
lifespan. Due to the visually observed rutting that is occurring and the higher traffic volumes associated
with Garden Avenue, it appears there may be subgrade-related issues contributing the distress observed
the pavements. As such, we recommend a complete reconstruction of Garden Avenue, which will
provide the highest quality pavement and improve the subgrade conditions simultaneously. We
recommend the existing bituminous pavement and aggregate be removed, the existing subgrade
recompacted, and a new pavement section, including bituminous and aggregate base, be placed.
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 11
C.3. Site Grading and Excavations
This section outlines site grading recommendations for the full pavement reconstruction option as
outlined in Section C.2.b. Included are recommendations for engineered fill soil types and classification,
as well as compaction recommendations for both engineered fill soils and aggregate base material.
C.3.a. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction
Table 7 below contains our recommendations for engineered fill materials.
Table 7. Engineered Fill Materials
Locations To Be Used Engineered Fill Classification
Possible Soil Type Descriptions Gradation Additional Requirements
Pavement areas Pavement fill SP, SP-SM, SM
100% passing 3-inch sieve <30% passing No. 200 sieve
< 2% Organic Content (OC) Plasticity index (PI) < 15% Debris Free
Drainage layer Non-frost-susceptible
Free-draining
Non-frost-susceptible fill
MnDOT select granular
SP, SP-SM, SW
100% passing 1-inch sieve < 12% passing #200 sieve
See MnDOT 3149.2.B.2
* More select soils comprised of coarse sands with < 5% passing #200 sieve may be needed to accommodate work occurring in
periods of wet or freezing weather.
We recommend spreading engineered fill in loose lifts of approximately 12 inches thick. We recommend
compacting engineered fill in accordance with the criteria presented below in Table 8. The project
documents should specify relative compaction of engineered fill.
Table 8. Compaction Recommendations Summary - Soil
Reference
Relative Compaction, percent (ASTM D698 – Standard Proctor)
Moisture Content Variance from Optimum, percentage points
Granular Soils (SP, SP-SM) Silty Sand Soils (SM)
Within 3 feet of pavement subgrade 100 * -2 to +1
More than 3 feet below pavement subgrade 95 * -1 to +3
*The minimum moisture content should be no less than 5 percent and no more than 3 percentage points over optimum.
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 12
Table 9. Compaction Recommendations Summary – Aggregate Base
Material
Relative Compaction, percent
(ASTM D698 – Standard Proctor)
Aggregate Base 100
The project documents should not allow the contractor to use frozen material as engineered fill or to
place engineered fill on frozen material.
We recommend performing density tests in engineered fill to evaluate if the contractors are effectively
compacting the soil and meeting project requirements.
C.4. Pavements
C.4.a. Pavement Subgrade Preparation – Full Reconstruction
We recommend the following steps for pavement subgrade preparation, understanding the site will have
a grade change of 1 foot or less. Note that project planning may need to require additional subcuts to
limit frost heave.
1. Strip unsuitable soils consisting of existing pavements, organic soils, debris-laden soils,
existing structures (if encountered), and other unsuitable soils from the area within 3 feet of
the surface of the proposed pavement grade.
2. Have a geotechnical representative observe the excavated subgrade to evaluate if additional
subgrade improvements are necessary. Based on the results of the borings, the contractor
should anticipate that soil correction excavations of the existing fill may be needed to
provide a stable subgrade. Where needed, subcuts on the order of 2 to 3 feet should be
sufficient in pavement areas at this site.
3. Slope subgrade soils to allow the removal of accumulating water.
4. Scarify, moisture condition, and surface compact the subgrade.
5. Place pavement engineered fill to grade and compact in accordance with Section C.3.d. to
bottom of pavement and exterior slab section. See Section C.3.e. for additional
considerations related to frost heave.
6. Proofroll the pavement or exterior slab subgrade as described in Section C.2.d.
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 13
C.4.b. Proofroll Observations
After preparing the subgrade as described in C.3.a for the Garden Avenue Area prior to placing the
aggregate base, and after preparing the reclaimed material in the Falcon Woods areas, we recommend
proofrolling the soils with a fully loaded tandem-axle truck. We also recommend having a geotechnical
representative observe the proofroll. Areas that fail the proofroll likely indicate soft or weak areas that
will require additional soil correction work to support pavements.
The contractor should correct areas that display excessive yielding or rutting during the proofroll, as
determined by the geotechnical representative. Possible options for subgrade correction include
moisture conditioning and recompaction, subcutting and replacement with soil or crushed aggregate,
and/or geotextiles. We recommend performing a second proofroll after the aggregate base material is in
place, and prior to placing bituminous pavements
C.4.c. Design Sections
Our scope of services for this project did not include laboratory tests on subgrade soils to determine an
R-value for pavement design. Based on our experience with similar soils anticipated at the pavement
subgrade elevation, we recommend pavement design assume an average R-Value of 20 for both project
sites. Note the contractor may need to perform limited removal of unsuitable or less suitable soils to
achieve this value. Tables 10 and 11 provides minimum recommended pavement sections, based on the
soils support and traffic loads. We understand that the City of Falcon Heights requires all residential
roadways to be designed, at a minimum, as a 7-ton roadway.
Table 10. Recommended Minimum Bituminous Pavement Sections – Falcon Woods Area (ST-1 through ST-7)
Use 7-ton roadway 7-ton roadway with sand subbase
Minimum asphalt thickness (inches) 3 1/2 3 1/2
Minimum aggregate base thickness (inches) 8 6
Minimum granular subbase --- 12
Table 11. Recommended Minimum Bituminous Pavement Sections - Garden Avenue (ST-8 through ST-11)
Use 7-ton roadway 7-ton roadway with sand subbase
Minimum asphalt thickness (inches) 4 4
Minimum aggregate base thickness (inches) 8 6
Minimum granular subbase --- 12
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 14
C.4.d. Bituminous Pavement Materials
Appropriate mix designs are critical to the performance of flexible pavements. We can provide
recommendations for pavement material selection during final pavement design.
C.4.e. Subgrade Drainage
We recommend installing perforated drainpipes throughout pavement areas at low points, around catch
basins, and behind curb in landscaped areas. We also recommend installing drainpipes along pavement
where exterior grades promote drainage toward those edge areas. The contractor should place
drainpipes in small trenches, extended below the aggregate base material. The draintile systems should
be tied to the existing storm sewer system for disposal of water runoff.
C.4.f. Performance and Maintenance
We based the above pavement designs on a 20-year performance life for pavements. This is the amount
of time before we anticipate the pavement will require reconstruction. This performance life assumes
routine maintenance, such as seal coating and crack sealing. The actual pavement life will vary depending
on variations in weather, traffic conditions, and maintenance.
Many conditions affect the overall performance of the exterior slabs and pavements. Some of these
conditions include the environment, loading conditions and the level of ongoing maintenance. With
regard to bituminous pavements in particular, it is common to have thermal cracking develop within the
first few years of placement, and continue throughout the life of the pavement. We recommend
developing a regular maintenance plan for filling cracks in exterior slabs and pavements to lessen the
potential impacts for cold weather distress due to frost heave or warm weather distress due to wetting
and softening of the subgrade.
D. Procedures
D.1. Penetration Test Borings
We drilled the penetration test borings with a truck-mounted core and auger drill equipped with hollow-
stem auger. We performed the borings in general accordance with ASTM D6151 taking penetration test
samples at 2 1/2- or 5-foot intervals in general accordance with ASTM D1586. The boring logs show the
actual sample intervals and corresponding depths. Pavement cores were also collected near each boring
location.
We sealed penetration test boreholes in general accordance with MDH procedures.
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 15
D.2. Exploration Logs
D.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets
The Appendix includes Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings. The logs identify and
describe the penetrated geologic materials, and present the results of penetration resistance and other
in-situ tests performed. The logs also present the results of laboratory tests performed on penetration
test samples and groundwater measurements.
We inferred strata boundaries from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings.
Because we did not perform continuous sampling, the strata boundary depths are only approximate. The
boundary depths likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may occur as
gradual rather than abrupt transitions.
D.2.b. Geologic Origins
We assigned geologic origins to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report, based
on: (1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2) visual
classification of the various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface
exploration, (3) penetration resistance testing performed for the project, (4) laboratory test results, and
(5) available common knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the
site and surrounding area in the past.
D.3. Material Classification and Testing
D.3.a. Visual and Manual Classification
We visually and manually classified the geologic materials encountered based on ASTM D2488. When we
performed laboratory classification tests, we used the results to classify the geologic materials in
accordance with ASTM D2487. The Appendix includes a chart explaining the classification system we used.
D.3.b. Laboratory Testing
The exploration logs in the Appendix note the results of the laboratory tests performed on geologic
material samples. We performed the tests in general accordance with ASTM procedures.
D.4. Groundwater Measurements
The drillers checked for groundwater while advancing the penetration test borings, and again after auger
withdrawal. We then filled the boreholes or allowed them to remain open for an extended period of
observation, as noted on the boring logs.
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 16
E. Qualifications
E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions
E.1.a. Material Strata
We developed our evaluation, analyses and recommendations from a limited amount of site and
subsurface information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from
exploration locations continuously with depth. Therefore, we must infer strata boundaries and
thicknesses to some extent. Strata boundaries may also be gradual transitions, and project planning
should expect the strata to vary in depth, elevation and thickness, away from the exploration locations.
Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until
performing additional exploration work, or starting construction. If future activity for this project reveals
any such variations, you should notify us so that we may reevaluate our recommendations. Such
variations could increase construction costs, and we recommend including a contingency to
accommodate them.
E.1.b. Groundwater Levels
We made groundwater measurements under the conditions reported herein and shown on the
exploration logs, and interpreted in the text of this report. Note that the observation periods were
relatively short, and project planning can expect groundwater levels to fluctuate in response to rainfall,
flooding, irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications and other seasonal
and annual factors.
E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility
E.2.a. Plan Review
We based this report on a limited amount of information, and we made a number of assumptions to help
us develop our recommendations. We should be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the
designs and specifications. This review will allow us to evaluate whether we anticipated the design
correctly, if any design changes affect the validity of our recommendations, and if the design and
specifications correctly interpret and implement our recommendations.
City of Falcon Heights
Project B2203417
June 13, 2022
Page 17
E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing
We recommend retaining us to perform the required observations and testing during construction as
part of the ongoing geotechnical evaluation. This will allow us to correlate the subsurface conditions
exposed during construction with those encountered by the borings and provide professional continuity
from the design phase to the construction phase. If we do not perform observations and testing during
construction, it becomes the responsibility of others to validate the assumption made during the
preparation of this report and to accept the construction-related geotechnical engineer-of-record
responsibilities.
E.3. Use of Report
This report is for the exclusive use of the addressed parties. Without written approval, we assume no
responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations may
not be appropriate for other parties or projects.
E.4. Standard of Care
In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under
similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality.
No warranty, express or implied, is made.
Appendix
ST-1
ST-2
ST-3
ST-4
ST-7
ST-6
ST-5
ROSELAWN AVENUE W.
AUTUMN STREET
PRIOR AVENUE N.SUMMER STREET
GARDEN AVENUEMOORE STREETHOWELL STREETTATUM STREETST-8 ST-9 ST-10 ST-11
GARDEN AVENUE
PASCAL STREETSNELLING AVENUEHAMLINE AVENUE N.FALCON WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD
GARDEN AVENUECLEVELAND AVENUE N.FAIRVIEW AVENUE N.HAMLINE AVENUE N.SNELLING AVENUE N.LARPENTEUR AVENUE W.
ROSELAWN AVENUE W.F:\2022\B2203417\CAD\B2203417.dwg,Geotech,5/16/2022 4:49:11 AMbraunintertec.com952.995.2000Minneapolis, MN 5543811001 Hampshire Avenue S
Project No:
B2203417
Drawn By:Date Drawn:
Checked By:
Last Modified: 5/16/22
Drawing No:
Project Information
Drawing Information
B2203417
JAG4/27/22
RSJ
Falcon Heights 2023Pavement Management
Garden Avenue and
the Falcon Woods
Neighborhood
Falcon Heights,Minnesota
Soil BoringLocation Sketch
N
DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFSTANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING
0
SCALE:1"= 200'
200'100'
FALCON WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD
GARDEN AVENUE
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Elev./
Depth
ft
986.1
0.8
980.6
6.3 WaterLevelDescription of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 3 1/2 inches of bituminous over 5
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel,
contains concrete debris, brown, moist
END OF BORING
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings
5
10
15 SampleBlows
(N-Value)
Recovery
11-16-7-6
(23)
16"
2-4-3-5
(7)
18"
1-4-4-5
(8)
15"
qₚtsf
MC
%
14
Tests or Remarks
P200=44%
Water not observed while
drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2203417
Geotechnical Evaluation
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement Mgmt
Garden Avenue
Falcon Heights, Minnesota
BORING:ST-1
LOCATION: See attached sketch
NORTHING:175582 EASTING:551775
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:05/06/22 END DATE:05/06/22
SURFACE
ELEVATION:986.9 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:2 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Sunny
B2203417 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/16/2022 ST-1 page 1 of 1DRAFT
Elev./
Depth
ft
981.8
0.9
979.7
3.0
976.4
6.3 WaterLevelDescription of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 3 1/2 inches of bituminous over 7
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-
grained, trace Gravel, contains seams of Clay,
dark brown to brown, moist
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-
grained, trace Gravel, contains seams of Clay,
brown, moist
Little Gravel at 5 feet
END OF BORING
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings
5
10
15 SampleBlows
(N-Value)
Recovery
13-6-5-2
(11)
17"
3-3-4-5
(7)
18"
6-5-8-11
(13)
15"
qₚtsf
MC
%
13
Tests or Remarks
Water not observed while
drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2203417
Geotechnical Evaluation
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement Mgmt
Garden Avenue
Falcon Heights, Minnesota
BORING:ST-2
LOCATION: See attached sketch
NORTHING:175737 EASTING:552265
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:05/06/22 END DATE:05/06/22
SURFACE
ELEVATION:982.7 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:2 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Sunny
B2203417 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/16/2022 ST-2 page 1 of 1DRAFT
Elev./
Depth
ft
988.2
0.8
987.0
2.0
982.7
6.3 WaterLevelDescription of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 4 inches of bituminous over 5
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-
SM), fine to coarse-grained, little Gravel,
brown, moist
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-
grained, trace Gravel, contains seams of
organic, contains bituminous debris, brown,
moist
END OF BORING
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings
5
10
15 SampleBlows
(N-Value)
Recovery
6-15-11-8
(26)
15"
6-4-3-3
(7)
20"
3-4-4-5
(8)
14"
qₚtsf
MC
%
5
Tests or Remarks
OC=1%
Water not observed while
drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2203417
Geotechnical Evaluation
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement Mgmt
Garden Avenue
Falcon Heights, Minnesota
BORING:ST-3
LOCATION: See attached sketch
NORTHING:175303 EASTING:551962
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:05/06/22 END DATE:05/06/22
SURFACE
ELEVATION:989.0 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:2 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Sunny
B2203417 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/16/2022 ST-3 page 1 of 1DRAFT
Elev./
Depth
ft
984.1
0.8
982.9
2.0
980.9
4.0
978.6
6.3 WaterLevelDescription of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 4 1/2 inches of bituminous over 5
1/2 inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-
grained, little Gravel, dark brown, moist
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-
grained, trace Gravel, contains bituminous
debris, dark brown, moist
FILL: SILTY SAND (SC-SM), fine to medium-
grained, trace Gravel, contains seams of Clay,
brown, moist
END OF BORING
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings
5
10
15 SampleBlows
(N-Value)
Recovery
10-14-8-6
(22)
18"
10-12-18-18
(30)
6"
12-13-10-10
(23)
22"
qₚtsf
MC
%
8
Tests or Remarks
P200=22%
Water not observed while
drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2203417
Geotechnical Evaluation
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement Mgmt
Garden Avenue
Falcon Heights, Minnesota
BORING:ST-4
LOCATION: See attached sketch
NORTHING:174993 EASTING:551631
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:05/06/22 END DATE:05/06/22
SURFACE
ELEVATION:984.9 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:2 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Sunny
B2203417 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/16/2022 ST-4 page 1 of 1DRAFT
Elev./
Depth
ft
983.3
0.7
980.0
4.0
977.7
6.3 WaterLevelDescription of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 3 inches of bituminous over 5 1/2
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: SILTY SAND with GRAVEL (SM), fine to
medium-grained, brown, moist
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-
grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist
END OF BORING
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings
5
10
15 SampleBlows
(N-Value)
Recovery
7-11-14-8
(25)
19"
14-16-17-22
(33)
16"
7-7-7-10
(14)
20"
qₚtsf
MC
%
6
Tests or Remarks
Water not observed while
drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2203417
Geotechnical Evaluation
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement Mgmt
Garden Avenue
Falcon Heights, Minnesota
BORING:ST-5
LOCATION: See attached sketch
NORTHING:174541 EASTING:551946
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:05/06/22 END DATE:05/06/22
SURFACE
ELEVATION:984.0 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:2 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Sunny
B2203417 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/16/2022 ST-5 page 1 of 1DRAFT
Elev./
Depth
ft
983.5
0.7
978.0
6.2 WaterLevelDescription of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 3 inches of bituminous over 5 1/2
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT and
GRAVEL (SP-SM), fine to coarse-grained,
brown, moist
END OF BORING
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings
5
10
15 SampleBlows
(N-Value)
Recovery
6-12-21-14
(33)
20"
10-26-14-11
(40)
18"
10-10-8-12
(18)
16"
qₚtsf
MC
%
4
Tests or Remarks
P200=7%
Water not observed while
drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2203417
Geotechnical Evaluation
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement Mgmt
Garden Avenue
Falcon Heights, Minnesota
BORING:ST-6
LOCATION: See attached sketch
NORTHING:174970 EASTING:552247
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:05/06/22 END DATE:05/06/22
SURFACE
ELEVATION:984.2 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:2 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Sunny
B2203417 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/16/2022 ST-6 page 1 of 1DRAFT
Elev./
Depth
ft
986.2
0.7
984.9
2.0
980.6
6.3 WaterLevelDescription of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 4 inches of bituminous over 4
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-
grained, little Gravel, dark brown to brown,
moist
FILL: SILTY SAND with GRAVEL (SM), fine to
coarse-grained, brown, moist
Clay seams at 4 feet
END OF BORING
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings
5
10
15 SampleBlows
(N-Value)
Recovery
2-10-15-18
(25)
18"
38-19-16-16
(35)
14"
50-30-8-8
(38)
16"
qₚtsf
MC
%
5
8
Tests or Remarks
Water not observed while
drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2203417
Geotechnical Evaluation
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement Mgmt
Garden Avenue
Falcon Heights, Minnesota
BORING:ST-7
LOCATION: See attached sketch
NORTHING:174909 EASTING:551951
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:05/06/22 END DATE:05/06/22
SURFACE
ELEVATION:986.9 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:2 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Sunny
B2203417 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/16/2022 ST-7 page 1 of 1DRAFT
Elev./
Depth
ft
967.7
0.7
966.4
2.0
964.4
4.0
962.1
6.3 WaterLevelDescription of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 4 inches of bituminous over 4
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-
grained, trace Gravel, contains concrete debris,
dark brown, moist
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-
grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist
FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-
SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel,
contains seams of Silt, light brown, moist
END OF BORING
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings
5
10
15 SampleBlows
(N-Value)
Recovery
10-50
(50)
10"
10-10-8-12
(18)
20"
10-9-10-12
(19)
22"
qₚtsf
MC
%
5
Tests or Remarks
P200=16%
Water not observed while
drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2203417
Geotechnical Evaluation
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement Mgmt
Garden Avenue
Falcon Heights, Minnesota
BORING:ST-8
LOCATION: See attached sketch
NORTHING:174560 EASTING:556224
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:05/06/22 END DATE:05/06/22
SURFACE
ELEVATION:968.4 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:2 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Sunny
B2203417 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/16/2022 ST-8 page 1 of 1DRAFT
Elev./
Depth
ft
952.5
1.0
949.5
4.0
947.2
6.3 WaterLevelDescription of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 4 1/2 inches of bituminous over 7
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-
grained, little Gravel, brown, moist
Concrete debris at 2 feet
FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to
coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist
END OF BORING
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings
5
10
15 SampleBlows
(N-Value)
Recovery
23-34-14-3
(48)
18"
10-16-23-17
(39)
20"
5-6-5-5
(11)
18"
qₚtsf
MC
%
3
Tests or Remarks
P200=5%
Water not observed while
drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2203417
Geotechnical Evaluation
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement Mgmt
Garden Avenue
Falcon Heights, Minnesota
BORING:ST-9
LOCATION: See attached sketch
NORTHING:174573 EASTING:557065
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:05/06/22 END DATE:05/06/22
SURFACE
ELEVATION:953.5 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:2 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Sunny
B2203417 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/16/2022 ST-9 page 1 of 1DRAFT
Elev./
Depth
ft
947.9
0.8
944.7
4.0
942.4
6.3 WaterLevelDescription of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 4 inches of bituminous over 6
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-
SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel,
contains seams of Clay, light brown, moist
FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to
coarse-grained, trace Gravel, light brown, moist
END OF BORING
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings
5
10
15 SampleBlows
(N-Value)
Recovery
11-11-9-5
(20)
16"
8-9-7-9
(16)
18"
5-5-5-7
(10)
20"
qₚtsf
MC
%
6
Tests or Remarks
Water not observed while
drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2203417
Geotechnical Evaluation
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement Mgmt
Garden Avenue
Falcon Heights, Minnesota
BORING:ST-10
LOCATION: See attached sketch
NORTHING:174585 EASTING:557813
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:05/06/22 END DATE:05/06/22
SURFACE
ELEVATION:948.7 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:2 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Sunny
B2203417 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/16/2022 ST-10 page 1 of 1DRAFT
Elev./
Depth
ft
942.8
1.0
939.8
4.0
937.4
6.4 WaterLevelDescription of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 7 inches of bituminous over 5
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-
grained, slightly organic, trace Gravel,
bituminous, brown to dark brown, moist
FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-
SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel,
contains seams of Silt, light brown, moist
END OF BORING
Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings
5
10
15 SampleBlows
(N-Value)
Recovery
2-18-10-6
(28)
16"
5-5-4-10
(9)
20"
5-6-5-6
(11)
22"
qₚtsf
MC
%
8
7
Tests or Remarks
OC=2%
P200=9%
Water not observed while
drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2203417
Geotechnical Evaluation
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement Mgmt
Garden Avenue
Falcon Heights, Minnesota
BORING:ST-11
LOCATION: See attached sketch
NORTHING:174599 EASTING:558567
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:05/06/22 END DATE:05/06/22
SURFACE
ELEVATION:943.8 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:2 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Sunny
B2203417 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/16/2022 ST-11 page 1 of 1DRAFT
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement
Management
B2203417
Core Photo Log
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
Braunintertec.com
ST-1
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement
Management
B2203417
Core Photo Log
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
Braunintertec.com
ST-2
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement
Management
B2203417
Core Photo Log
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
Braunintertec.com
ST-3
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement
Management
B2203417
Core Photo Log
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
Braunintertec.com
ST-4
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement
Management
B2203417
Core Photo Log
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
Braunintertec.com
ST-5
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement
Management
B2203417
Core Photo Log
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
Braunintertec.com
ST-6
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement
Management
B2203417
Core Photo Log
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
Braunintertec.com
ST-7
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement
Management
B2203417
Core Photo Log
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
Braunintertec.com
ST-8
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement
Management
B2203417
Core Photo Log
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
Braunintertec.com
ST-9
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement
Management
B2203417
Core Photo Log
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
Braunintertec.com
ST-10
Falcon Heights 2023 Pavement
Management
B2203417
Core Photo Log
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
Braunintertec.com
ST-11
Descriptive Terminology of Soil
Based on Standards ASTM D2487/2488
(Unified Soil Classification System)
Group
Symbol Group NameB
Cu ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D GW Well‐graded gravelE
Cu < 4 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D GP Poorly graded gravelE
Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravelE F G
Fines Classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelE F G
Cu ≥ 6 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D SW Well‐graded sandI
Cu < 6 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D SP Poorly graded sandI
Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sandF G I
Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sandF G I
CL Lean clayK L M
PI < 4 or plots below "A" lineJ ML SiltK L M
Organic OL
CH Fat clayK L M
MH Elastic siltK L M
Organic OH
PT Peat Highly Organic Soils
Silts and Clays
(Liquid limit less than
50)
Silts and Clays
(Liquid limit 50 or
more)
Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor
Inorganic
Inorganic
PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" lineJ
PI plots on or above "A" line
PI plots below "A" line
Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and
Group Names Using Laboratory TestsA
Soil Classification
Coarse‐grained Soils (more than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve)Fine‐grained Soils (50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve) Sands
(50% or more coarse
fraction passes No. 4
sieve)
Clean Gravels
(Less than 5% finesC)
Gravels with Fines
(More than 12% finesC)
Clean Sands
(Less than 5% finesH)
Sands with Fines
(More than 12% finesH)
Gravels
(More than 50% of
coarse fraction
retained on No. 4
sieve)
Liquid Limit − oven dried
Liquid Limit − not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M N
Organic silt K L M O
Liquid Limit − oven dried
Liquid Limit − not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M P
Organic silt K L M Q
ParticleSize Identification
Boulders.............. over 12"
Cobbles................ 3" to 12"
Gravel
Coarse............. 3/4" to 3" (19.00 mm to 75.00 mm)
Fine................. No. 4 to 3/4" (4.75 mm to 19.00 mm)
Sand
Coarse.............. No. 10 to No. 4 (2.00 mm to 4.75 mm)
Medium........... No. 40 to No. 10 (0.425 mm to 2.00 mm)
Fine.................. No. 200 to No. 40 (0.075 mm to 0.425 mm)
Silt........................ No. 200 (0.075 mm) to .005 mm
Clay...................... < .005 mm
Relative ProportionsL, M
trace............................. 0 to 5%
little.............................. 6 to 14%
with.............................. ≥ 15%
Inclusion Thicknesses
lens............................... 0 to 1/8"
seam............................. 1/8" to 1"
layer.............................. over 1"
Apparent Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils
Very loose ..................... 0 to 4 BPF
Loose ............................ 5 to 10 BPF
Medium dense.............. 11 to 30 BPF
Dense............................ 31 to 50 BPF
Very dense.................... over 50 BPF
A. Based on the material passing the 3‐inch (75‐mm) sieve.
B. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or boulders,
or both" to group name.
C. Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols:
GW‐GM well‐graded gravel with silt
GW‐GC well‐graded gravel with clay
GP‐GM poorly graded gravel with silt
GP‐GC poorly graded gravel with clay
D. Cu= D60/ D10 Cc = 𝐷30 2/ ሺ𝐷10 𝑥 𝐷60)
E. If soil contains ≥ 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name.
F. If fines classify as CL‐ML, use dual symbol GC‐GM or SC‐SM.
G. If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name.
H. Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols:
SW‐SM well‐graded sand with silt
SW‐SC well‐graded sand with clay
SP‐SM poorly graded sand with silt
SP‐SC poorly graded sand with clay
I. If soil contains ≥ 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name.
J. If Atterberg limits plot in hatched area, soil is CL‐ML, silty clay.
K. If soil contains 15 to < 30% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel", whichever is
predominant.
L. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name.
M. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name.
N. PI ≥ 4 and plots on or above “A” line.
O. PI < 4 or plots below “A” line.
P. PI plots on or above “A” line.
Q. PI plots below “A” line.
Laboratory Tests
DD Dry density,pcf qp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf
WD Wet density, pcf qU Unconfined compression test, tsf
P200 % Passing #200 sieve LL Liquid limit
MC Moisture content, %PL Plastic limit
OC Organic content, %PI Plasticity index
Consistency of Blows Approximate Unconfined
Cohesive Soils Per Foot Compressive Strength
Very soft................... 0 to 1 BPF................... < 0.25 tsf
Soft........................... 2 to 4 BPF................... 0.25 to 0.5 tsf
Medium.................... 5to 8 BPF .................. 0.5 to 1 tsf
Stiff........................... 9 to 15 BPF................. 1 to 2 tsf
Very Stiff................... 16 to 30 BPF............... 2 to 4 tsf
Hard.......................... over 30 BPF................ > 4 tsf
Drilling Notes:
Blows/N‐value: Blows indicatethe driving resistance recorded
for each 6‐inch interval. The reported N‐value is the blows per
foot recorded by summing the second and third interval in
accordance with the Standard Penetration Test, ASTM D1586.
PartialPenetration:If the sampler could not be driven
through a full 6‐inch interval, the number of blows for that
partial penetration is shown as #/x" (i.e. 50/2"). The N‐value is
reported as "REF" indicating refusal.
Recovery: Indicates the inches of sample recovered from the
sampled interval. For a standard penetration test, full recovery
is 18", and is 24" for a thinwall/shelby tube sample.
WOH: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of
hammer and rods alone; driving not required.
WOR: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of
rods alone; hammer weight and driving not required.
Water Level: Indicates the water level measured by the
drillers either while drilling ( ), at the end of drilling ( ),
or at some time after drilling ( ).
Moisture Content:
Dry:Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch.
Moist: Damp but no visible water.
Wet: Visible free water, usually soil is below water table.
5/2021
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
COUNCIL RESOLUTION
October 26, 2022
No. 22-50
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE 2023 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT
FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING PUBLIC HEARING FOR IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Council adopted October 26, 2022, a report has
been prepared by the City Engineer with reference to the improvement of the following streets:
• Holton Street, Larpenteur Avenue to Roselawn Avenue
• Albert Street, Ruggles Street to Roselawn Avenue
• Sheldon Street, Ruggles Street to Roselawn Avenue
• Ruggles Street, Holton Street to Hamline Avenue
• Garden Avenue, East Snelling Service Drive to Hamline Avenue
and this report was received by the Council on October 26, 2022, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as
recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for
affected parcels.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Falcon
Heights, Minnesota:
1. The council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report and
the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $1,688,000. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on November 9, 2022, in the council chambers of City Hall at 7:00 p.m. and the City Administrator shall give mailed and
published notice of such hearing and improvement, as required by law.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Moved by: Approved by:
Randy Gustafson
Mayor
October 26, 2022
GUSTAFSON ____ In Favor Attested by:
LEEHY Jack Linehan
MEYER ____ Against City Administrator
WEHYEE October 26, 2022
BLANK PAGE
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
Regular Meeting of the City Council
City Hall 2077 West Larpenteur Avenue MINUTES October 12, 2022 at 7:00 P.M.
A. CALL TO ORDER: 7:02 p.m. B. ROLL CALL: ANDREWS _A__ GUSTAFSON__X__ LEEHY_X__
MEYER ___ WEHYEE__X_ STAFF PRESENT: LINEHAN__X__
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Leehy motions for Approval of the Agenda; approved 3-0
D. PRESENTATION:
1. Recognition of Kay Andrews’ Service Mayor Gustafson states that Council Member Kay Andrews has sent a letter of resignation to the City and resigned from the City Council effective today, October 12th,
2022. In addition, Kay Andrews became a resident of the City of Roseville after 31 years
of living in Falcon Heights. The City Council has a resolution honoring Kay Andrews’ service to Falcon Heights. The proclamation states WHEREAS, Council Member Kay
Andrews served as President and CEO of Northeast Youth and Family Services,
collaborating with various agencies, including 15 municipalities, 3 school districts and 5
police departments to provide community-based support services and mental health
counseling to the northeastern suburbs of Ramsey County. Council Member Kay
Andrews provided 33 years of service to NYFS and the community, and, in recognition
of this, a facility opened in 2021 was named the Kay Andrews Discovery Center; and
WHEREAS, Council Member Kay Andrews has resided in Falcon Heights since 1992;
and WHEREAS, Council Member Kay Andrews has served on the Planning
Commission, the Human Rights Commission, and the Inclusion and Policing Task
Force, with the desire to create a strengthened, safe, inclusive and more collaborative
community where all people are welcomed, included and safe; and WHEREAS, Kay
Andrews was appointed to the Falcon Heights City Council and took an Oath of Office
on January 8, 2020; and WHEREAS, Council Member Kay Andrews tendered her
resignation from the Falcon Heights City Council effective October 12, 2022; and
WHEREAS, Council Member Kay Andrews has honorably dedicated herself to serving
her community and the residents of Falcon Heights and is a bright example of public
service. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that I, Mayor, Randall C. Gustafson, on
behalf of the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota, do hereby honor and
recognize Kay Andrews for her contributions and service to the City of Falcon Heights
as a councilmember. May this proclamation be provided to Kay Andrews in recognition
for her years of service to the community.
Council Member Wehyee states it has been a pleasure working with Kay Andrews. Kay has always presented what I think is a balanced perspective on many of the issues we
have considered on City Council and has been a great addition to the team. It was a
pleasure starting my political career alongside of her. Council Member Leehy states it has been a pleasure to know Kay Andrews, as a neighbor, friend and colleague in serving young people, being that they’ve bone done
similar work, and to have heard of all of her hard work, which has impacted many lives.
Then, stepping forward to be a part of the inclusion and policing task force that we worked on together and then on City Council. Thank you so much for being the loving and wise person you are and for your dedication to Falcon Heights. You will be deeply missed, and we wish you the best.
Mayor Gustafson thanks Kay very much and states it has been a pleasure. Your service to the citizens and the City of Falcon Heights during your 30 years as a resident and an active one is appreciated. Council Members Leehy and Wehyee
motion to Recognize Kay Andrews’ Service;
approved 3-0 E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. September 28, 2022 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
2. October 5, 2022 City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes
Council Member Wehyee motions for Approval of Minutes; approved 3-0
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
G. CONSENT AGENDA: 1. General Disbursements through: 10/6/22 $32,412.76 Payroll through: 9/30/22 $20,711.11
Wire Payments through: 9/30/22 $14,013.33
2. Accept the Resignation of Kay Andrews from the City Council and Declare a Vacancy 3. Approve Two-Year Extension Agreement with Tennis for Recycling Services
Council Member Leehy motions to Approve the
Consent Agenda; approved 3-0 H: POLICY ITEMS:
I. INFORMATION/ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Council Member Leehy requests that when Jack Linehan, the City Administrator, gives his updates, that he includes clarification for those concerned about a passageway on Ruggles.
Council Member Wehyee states that the Planning Commission will meet on October 25th. The Planning Commission has not met since September.
Mayor Gustafson states that the Community Engagement Commission will be meeting Monday, October 17th, at 6:30 p.m.in the City Hall Chambers. The Commission will
discuss Human Rights Day and update the new resident packet. The Park and Recreation
Commission will have two new members. The City is still looking for someone from the community to step up for the St. Paul Water Board. More information on the St. Paul Water Board is on the City website. Or, give the Mayor a call to walk you through the process.
Council Member Leehy asks if there is a deadline for the St. Paul Water Commission. Linehan states that Friday, October 14th is the deadline. The City has not received any applicants for the Commission.
Council Member Leehy asks whether the notice describes the requirements for serving on that Commission. Linehan states that the description outlines the requirements. In addition, the St. Paul
Water Commission meets monthly in person. The term ends December 31st, 2023, so it is
about a 14-month commitment. Linehan states:
• Public Works Street Sweeping
o Public Works completed street sweeping of all Falcon Heights streets last week.
Street sweeping will continue periodically throughout the fall until snow falls.
o A reminder to residents: please do not rake leaves in to the street. The street
sweeper cannot take that additional volume of leaves, and it is an ordinance
violation.
Residents did a great job last week keeping leaves out of the street, which
made the pass through the community smoother and without equipment
clogging
• iWorQ Permitting System
o We are excited to announce the launch of our iWorQ public portal.
o Residents and contractors can now apply for a wide range of permits entirely
online, from fence permits to mechanical permits.
o Residents can also search active permits and see a full list of open permits. That is
public information. If residents were curious if there were active permits on a
home they wished to purchase, they could see that. Or, if they saw a contractor
working on a roof and were curious if they had a permit for it, they could look it
up and check as well.
o This new software will save staff time and improve service delivery to residents at
a minimal cost. A review is still required and the timeline is two days to two
weeks; we try to stay on the low end of that.
o To view the iWorQ public portal and apply for permits, visit the
www.falconheights.org, click on “I Want to” -> “Apply For” -> Permits. A button
on the permitting page will take you to the iWorQ portal.
• Falcon Woods 2025 PMP Neighborhood Meeting
o Wednesday, October 19th at 6:30 PM in Council Chambers
o The meeting will discuss the planned reconstruction of roads in Falcon Woods
occurring in 2025 to give residents an early overview.
• Ruggles Pathway Update
o The city has been contacted by neighbors in the Northeast Quadrant concerned
about the proposed Ruggles Pathway.
o I want to clarify that no decision has been made, and Engineering is including
various options in their feasibility report.
o The Ruggles Pathway has long been identified by the City as a site that needs to
be brought up to code to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. The current “goat path” does not meet federal requirements for wheel chair
accessibility.
o The next step in the process will be on Wednesday, October 26th at 7PM, when
Engineering presents the 2023 PMP Feasibility Report to the City Council.
o If the Council accepts the report, that will trigger a public hearing held on
Wednesday, November 9th at 7PM. Notice of the public hearing will be sent to all
residents impacted by the 2023 PMP by mail.
o Residents are encouraged to attend the November 9th Public Hearing, as
afterwards the City Council will make a final recommendation on the entirety of
the 2023 PMP, including the Ruggles Pathway.
• Amber Union Update
o Certificate of Occupancy was issued for the main building on September 30th.
o Some residents began moving in on October 1st.
o The western annex building is aiming to have a Certificate of Occupancy issued at
the end of October.
o A ribbon cutting and open house for neighbors is being planned to coincide with
the opening on the annex building in late October/early November. Dates and
formal invites are still being worked out with the developer and property
management company.
• Council Vacancy
o Following tonight’s declaration of vacancy, recruitment for Kay Andrews’
replacement for her term expiring December 31st, 2023 will begin on Thursday,
October 13th. Applications will be made available on our website and in-person at
City Hall. Applications will close on Wednesday, October 26th. The replacement
process will include interviews by the Council and potentially a citizen panel,
following both past practices and Minnesota State Statute.
J. COMMUNITY FORUM:
Please limit comments to 3 minutes per person. Items brought before the Council will be
referred for consideration. Council may ask questions for clarification, but no council
action or discussion will be held on these items. K. ADJOURNMENT: 7:22 p.m.
Motion by Council Member Leehy to adjourn the City Council Meeting; approved 3-0
Dated this 12th day of October, 2022
____________________________ __________________________
Jack Linehan, City Administrator Randall C. Gustafson, Mayor
BLANK PAGE
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota __________________________
Item General Disbursements, Payroll and Wire Payments
Description
General Disbursements through: 10/20/22 $222,924.42
Payroll through: 10/15/22 $23,798.72
Wire Payments through: 10/15/22 $16,067.73
Budget Impact The general disbursements, payroll and wire payments are consistent with the budget.
Attachment(s) • General Disbursements, Payroll and Wire Payments
Action(s) Requested Staff recommends that the Falcon Heights City Council approve general
disbursements, payroll and wire payments.
Meeting Date October 26, 2022
Agenda Item Consent G1
Attachment General Disbursements. Payroll, and Wire Payments
Submitted By Roland Olson, Finance Director
BLANK PAGE
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota __________________________
Item Approval of City License(s)
Description
The following individuals/entities have applied for a Holiday Tree Sales
License for 2022. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure.
1. Falcon Heights-Lauderdale Lions Club
The following individuals/entities have applied for a Bus Bench License for
2023. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure.
1. United States Bench Corporation
The following individuals/entities have applied for a Home Occupation
License for 2023. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure.
1. Bouquets in Bloom
2. Mercarik Incorporated
3. Weyandt Mediation, PLLC
The following individuals/entities have applied for a Multifamily Rental
Dwelling License for 2023. Staff have received the necessary documents for
licensure.
1. Skigh Development LLC - 1707 Lindig Street
2. Sagstetter Properties LLC - 1830 Larpenteur Ave. W.
3. Family Empire Holdings, LLC – 1855 Larpenteur Ave. W.
4. Legacy Apartments, LLC – 1845 Larpenteur Ave. W.
5. 1717 Fry Co. Ltd. Partnership – 1687, 1697, 1707 & 1717 Fry Street N.
Budget Impact N/A
Attachment(s) N/A
Action(s)
Requested
Staff recommends approval of the City license applications contingent on
background checks and fire inspections as required.
Meeting Date October 26, 2022
Agenda Item Consent G2
Attachment N/A
Submitted By Kelly Nelson
Assistant to the City Administrator
BLANK PAGE
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Families, Fields and Fair __________________________
Item 2023 Ramsey County Select Committee on Recycling & The Environment
(SCORE) Grant Submittal and Enter Into Agreement with Ramsey County for
Funding
Description
The City of Falcon Heights has a long standing history of working with Ramsey
County to increase participation in City Wide Recycling Services. The SCORE
Grant helps the City to perform these services and to increase the participation
rate through education, events, and a diversity of the activities. The results of
these actives contribute to our high participation rate and will continue to do so
into the future.
Our estimated allocation for 2023 from Ramsey County is $15,742.
Budget Impact Funds from the SCORE grant are used for a number of recycling efforts in the
city.
Attachment(s) • Resolution 22-51 Authorization to Apply for the Select Committee on
Recycling & the Environment (SCORE) Grant
Action(s)
Requested
Staff recommend approval of attached resolution authorizing application of the
2023 SCORE grant. The grant is in the estimated amount of $15,742.
Meeting Date October 26, 2022
Agenda Item Consent G3
Attachment Resolution 22-51
Submitted By Jack Linehan, City Administrator
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS COUNCIL RESOLUTION October 26, 2022 No. 22-51 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE 2023 RAMSEY COUNTY SELECT COMMITTEE ON RECYCLING & THE ENVIRONMENT (SCORE) GRANT SUBMITTAL AND ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH RAMSEY COUNTY FOR FUNDING
WHEREAS, the City of Falcon Heights has a recycling program, which serves the residents of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City utilizes the Select Committee on Recycling & the Environment (SCORE)
Grant funding to offset costs of that program each year; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that participation in this program is beneficial to the residents of Falcon Heights.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota:
1. Direct staff to apply for the Select Committee on Recycling & the Environment (SCORE)
Grant funding to offset costs of the program. 2. Authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to execute all necessary documents.
ADOPTED by the Falcon Heights City Council this 26th day of October, 2022.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Moved by: Approved by: ________________________ Randall Gustafson
Mayor GUSTAFSON ____ In Favor Attested by: ________________________ LEEHY Jack Linehan
MEYER ____ Against City Administrator WEHYEE
BLANK PAGE
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota __________________________
Item Appointment of Mike Tracy to the Parks and Recreation Commission
Description
City Staff and a current member of the Parks and Recreation Commission
interviewed Mike Tracy for the Parks and Recreation Commission. Mike Tracy
is a Falcon Heights resident who has been involved with the U of M’s rec
sports for many years. Mr. Tracy also brings ideas to the re-design of
Community Park from years of experience as a real estate agent and from
understanding land values.
Budget Impact N/A
Attachment(s) • Commission Application
• Resolution 22-52 Appointment of Mike Tracy to the Parks and
Recreation Commission
Action(s)
Requested
Staff recommends approval of attached resolution appointing Mike Tracy to
the Parks and Recreation Commission.
Meeting Date October 26, 2022
Agenda Item Consent G4
Attachment Application and Resolution 22-52
Submitted By Kelly Nelson, Assistant to the City
Administrator
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
COUNCIL RESOLUTION
October 26, 2022
No. 22-52
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -
RESOLUTION APPOINTING MIKE TRACY TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission shall serve in an advisory capacity to the
City Council regarding the effective, meaningful and equal involvement of Falcon Heights
residents in their community.
WHEREAS, City Staff and a current Parks Commissioner have interviewed Mike Tracy and
recommend appointment to the Falcon Heights Parks and Recreation Commission.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights,
Minnesota:
1. That the appointment of Mike Tracy to the Falcon Heights Parks and Recreation
Commission is approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moved by: Approved by: ________________________ Randall C. Gustafson Mayor
GUSTAFSON ____ In Favor Attested by: ________________________ LEEHY Jack Linehan MEYER ____ Against City Administrator WEHYEE
BLANK PAGE
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota __________________________
Item Appointment of Randi Lundell to the Parks and Recreation Commission
Description
City Staff and a current member of the Parks and Recreation Commission
interviewed Randi Lundell for the Parks and Recreation Commission. Ms.
Lundell is a Falcon Heights resident and frequent user of the parks, who offers
ideas for impactful but practical improvements and has previous grant-writing
experience. For these reasons, she is an ideal candidate for the commission.
Budget Impact N/A
Attachment(s) • Commission Application
• Resolution 22-53 Appointment of Randi Lundell to the Parks and
Recreation Commission
Action(s)
Requested
Staff recommends approval of attached resolution appointing Randi Lundell to
the Parks and Recreation Commission.
Meeting Date October 26, 2022
Agenda Item Consent G5
Attachment Application and Resolution 22-53
Submitted By Kelly Nelson, Assistant to the City
Administrator
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
COUNCIL RESOLUTION
October 26, 2022
No. 22-53
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -
RESOLUTION APPOINTING RANDI LUNDELL TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission shall serve in an advisory capacity to the
City Council regarding the effective, meaningful and equal involvement of Falcon Heights
residents in their community.
WHEREAS, City Staff and a current Parks Commissioner have interviewed Randi Lundell and
recommend appointment to the Falcon Heights Parks and Recreation Commission.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights,
Minnesota:
1. That the appointment of Randi Lundell to the Falcon Heights Parks and Recreation
Commission is approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moved by: Approved by: ________________________ Randall C. Gustafson Mayor
GUSTAFSON ____ In Favor Attested by: ________________________ LEEHY Jack Linehan MEYER ____ Against City Administrator WEHYEE
BLANK PAGE
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION (RCA)
City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota __________________________
Item A Flexible Benefits Plan Amendment to increase the maximum dollar limit
allowed by IRS statutory limits.
Description
Falcon Heights established a Flexible Benefit Plan in October of 2007. That plan
currently has a $2,500 maximum reimbursement limit for health care and a
$5,000 maximum reimbursement limit for dependent care. It has been
recommended by our Flexible Benefit Plan administrator that we amend the
plan to provide for the maximum statutory reimbursement limit of $3,050 for
the health flexible spending part of the plan. This increase is allowed by the
Internal Revenue Code, and adjusted from time to time due to inflation. This
amendment would allow for future statutory rate increases without us having
to amend the plan. Currently, this IRS approved increase is only in the Health
Care Flexible Spending part of the plan or in the Limited Health Care
Reimbursement Account part of the plan. Dependent care would remain at the
$5,000 level. Currently, city employees only use the Health Care Flexible
Spending and dependent care parts of the plan.
Budget Impact Estimated expenditure for this plan amendment is $250.
Attachment(s) City of Falcon Heights Flexible Benefits Plan Amendment.
Action(s)
Requested
Staff recommends approving the amendment for the city’s Flexible Benefits
Plan to allow for the maximum statutory reimbursement limits allowed by the
IRS.
Meeting Date October 26, 2022
Agenda Item G6
Attachment Flexible Benefit Plan Amendment
Submitted By Roland Olson Finance Director
BLANK PAGE