HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCAgenda_89Jul26CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
AGENDA
JULY 26, 1989
A. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M.
B. ROLL CALL: BUSH CIERNIA P. CHENOWETH WALLIN
BALDWIN WIESSNER S. CHENOWETH ATTORNEY
ENGINEER
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 12, 1989
D. PUBLIC HEARINGS: NONE
E. CONSENT AGENDA:
1. Disbursements
a. General Disbursements through 7/26/89, $95,742.78
b. Payroll, 7/1/89-7/15/89, $13,106.23
2. Ratification of Increase in 1989 Sealcoating Cost
3. Designation of Streets to be posted °'No Parking'"
during State Fair
4. Memo dated 7/7.7/89 regarding North Suburban Cable
Commission's Move from City Hall
5. Planning Commission Minutes of July 10, 1989
6. Licenses:
Ken's Roofing #353
John Beissel Inc. #356
Concept Designs Builders, Inc. #346
R.A.O. Construction #355
F. REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Amendments to Sections 9-4.01, Subd. 4; 9-2.04,
Subd. 1(c) and Subd. 2(d) of Chapter 9 of the City
Code
ACTION:
i 2. Re-schedule August 23rd City Council Meeting
ACTION:
3. Hamline Avenue Project - Local Feasibility Study
ACTION:
4. Schedule Council Workshop Meeting
ACTION:
5. Tatum Street Sod Project - Reimbursement
ACTION:
6. United Way Campaign Incentive
ACTION:
G. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND UPDATE:
H. ADJOURNMENT;
ACTION:
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 14, 1989
Baldwin called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
ALL MEMBERS PRESENT
Baldwin, Bush, P. Chenoweth, Ciernia, and Wallin. Also present
was Gedde, Maurer, Wiessner and S. Chenoweth.
MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 1989 APPROVED
Council approved the Minutes of June 28, 1989 as presented.
CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED
Council approved the following Consent Agenda:
1.Disbursements:
a. General Disbursements Through 7/14/89, $64,072.31
b. Payroll 6/16/89 - 6/30/89, $11,007.97
2.Cancellation of Check No. 22419
3.Appointment of Martin McCleery, 1918 Autumn, to Solid
Waste Commission to Complete Term of Benno Salewski
12/31/91)
4.Request for Permitted Accessory Use (Utility Bldg.), H.
Leonard Boche, 1776 Fry St.
5.Licenses:
a. Mechanical Contractors, Blaine Heating & AC, #350,
and Boehm Heating, #354
b. General Contractors, Mojek Construction, #351,
Booker Construction, #352
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ASSESSMENT POLICY
Maurer's letter dated July 6, 1989, (a copy of which is on file
in the Clerk's Office) relating to assessment of collector
streets was reviewed, after which Council thoroughly discussed
the matter and made recommendations. Maurer will come back with
a draft of the assessment policy addressing the items
discussed. Council also requested that a map be prepared
categorizing the different street uses.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT RELATING TO REGULATION OF DOGS DISCUSSED
Carol Carlson explained that the purpose of the proposed
amendment is to make it more convenient for the Roseville Animal
Control Officer to deal with a situation when a dog has bitten
someone. The present wording in the Code is different from the
Roseville wording forcing the officer to follow two sets of
rules. Following a short discussion, Wallin moved adoption of
Ordinance 0-89-11 which carried unanimously.
ORDINANCE 0-89-11
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 5-2.07 AND 5-2.09
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO REGULATION OF DOGS
MINUTES
JULY 14, 1989
PAGE 2
DISCUSSION - REQUEST FROM DENNIS HUNT, BULLSEYE CENTER, THAT THE
CITY WAIVE THE TAX DELINQUENCY PROVISION OF THE CITY LIQUOR
LICENSE REQUIREMENTS
Dennis Hunt, owner of Bullseye Center, explained that he is
interested in applying for a liquor license for a proposed
liquor store in his center. This is presently prohibited by
City code due to the fact that Bullseye has not paid the real
estate taxes for the last half of 1988. He stated that Bullseye
Golf is in bankruptcy proceedings (Chapter 11) and in order to
make the reorganization work it is necessary to have a cash
flow, which is not the case at present due to vacancies in the
building. For this reason he requested the City waive the
requirement that taxes be paid before a liquor license can be
issued. He also stated that he plans to pay the back taxes at
1,500 per month over a three year period. Baldwin advised Mr.
Hunt that the residents of Falcon Heights already have $400,000
invested in the center (bonds) and the only way to protect the
residents from paying double taxes on the Bulleye property is to
have the taxes paid to cover the bond payments. Following a
lengthy discussion Council agreed that it would not be prudent
to grant Hunt's request at this time as there is no reason to
believe that deleting that portion of the liquor code would
solve the problem. If Hunt can provide assurance that this is
the best way to cover taxes Council would again discuss the
matter.
DONATION TO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT LAKES AND TRAILS RESERVE UNIT
Wiessner explained that in 1988 Council authorized a donation of
500.00 to the Lakes and Trails Reserve Unit for extra traffic
patrol services for special events at the State Fairgrounds,
however due to an oversight the check was never issued.
Wiessner requested that Council authorize issuance of a check in
the amount of $1,000 to cover the 1988 donation of $500.00 plus
500.00 for the year 1989. Ciernia moved approval of the
request which carried unanimously.
PERA CONTRIBUTION INCREASE
Council noted that there will be an increase of $218.00 in the
City's PERA payments for the remainder of 1989 due to changes in
the State Law.
AMBULANCE BID AWARDED TO ROAD RESCUE, INC.
Fire Chief Leo Lindig reviewed the bids received from North
Emergency Vehicle Sales, North Central Ambulance Sales and
Service, and Road Rescue, Inc. He then recommended awarding
the bid to Road Rescue, Inc., based on the fact that they
submitted the low bid and met specifications. Following a
brief discussion, P. Chenoweth moved awarding the bid to Road
Rescue, Inc., which carried unanimously. Lindig also requested
that the old ambulance be kept as a back-up. Council asked that
the item be placed on the July 26th agenda for discussion.
MINUTES
JULY 14, 1989
PAGE 3
M-75 BUILDING MAINTENANCE SERVICE
Wiessner explained that there have been some problems with the
present cleaning service, ie. missed cleans, poor work, etc.,
and, therefore, bids were requested from other cleaning firms.
After evaluating the eight bids received, Staff recommended
signing a contract with M-75 Building Maintenance Service based
on cost and favorable references. Council concurred.
ADMINISTRATOR'S EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDED
Baldwin commented on Council's favorable assessment of the
Administrator's work in the past year and recommended that the
salary be increased to $41,500 annually, retroactive to the
anniversary date. Also discussed were changes in sections of
the agreement relating to vacation time and insurance benefits
to be in compliance with the benefits offered other employees.
Following the discussion, Wallin moved approval of the salary
increase and amendment of the vacation and insurance items in
the agreement. Motion carried unanimously.
WORKSHOP WITH PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION SCHEDULED FOR
7:00 P. M., 8/14/89
Council scheduled a workshop with the Park and Recreation
Commission for 7:00 P. M., August 14, 1989 to discuss future park
plans.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:04 P. M.
Tom Baldwin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Shirley Chenoweth, City Clerk
Consent X
Policy
r
C
CITY OF PALCON HEIGATS
REQUEST FOR CQUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Agenda Item: E-1
Meeting Date: 7/26/89
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Disbursements
SUBMITTED BY:
Tom Kelly
REVIEWED BY:
EXPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary):
a) General Disbursements through 7/26/89, $95,742.78
b) Payroll 7/1/89-7/15/89, $13,106.23
ACTION REQUESTED:
f~C~7~~
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN ~~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NlT1U'l tJ7 Ul Ul lJ7 U7 Ul U7 Ul Ul U7 (•Jl Ul (TI (•J1 Ul Ul CJ7 lJl U1 Ul Ul ~] ~ ~ ,(~ iP ~P ~P ~ ~ ~ ~P ~ ~N N N I-~ ---~ I~ N N N N I-' I-~ N O O O O O O O O O O l0 l0 l4 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 lp 0o OD ODWNI-~O1000JdlUt~A W NI-+O1000~1 O1U~~P W NI--~OIOOD~)dl(It~P WNH-'O140D~1
zCncn[n~:~~bdroroG~xlzb7dz333~n]h]''~LT13C1C~bdCUGd~y W~C O N• O n G G' rt O i--+ a 0 Ct] (D O Cn a a O z N ~+• (D N• G G C a 0 0 U~ r5 ri H H G ~a ~K ~a a a a ~K v, ~~ n.ro~~ rt~a n ~~m n ~--~~z~-o >z~sr~o mrtarta 'L3 E h• Q, I rt rt~ N N cn n K E Cn fn I N K ~' r, o ~ E H H N KN• U] r• G' K I (D ~ O O ~ N CJ O O (D (D rt O N I r• G cn ~ G K r•a a so r z~ ~ ro ro~ K~ m ~ ~ ~ n K c~l~~ ~•~ rtr• ~~nr'S ~ C~ fD G G H cD (D I G a u~ m S E E rr ~ H-- K~ cn a o o~ K e aroMmn ~ n a n qtr xo a C]rra a n cn u, m~ ~K ~~o o m~M x G H tT' N n I•'• UI N O G ~ O r'S '•C U1 bC7 x G lD cD C=7 rt f.~, r5arrsrO (D a G n n ~+• "C a rr G r• ~ ~ ;U G K ~ H m < 'T1 r• r- r
x a n o n~ m a ~-n cn prom cn n rra a r*m ~ m m rtn ~•
m ~ a cn~ G ~ ~ ~ a ~cn ~- ~•x n,n,r n u, rtK a afDNOto -'i art a ~' bD K C1 G (D r- N- a rt G (D K n (DGGcDHa1GN• ~'i (D G (D O fD G O O E ri rS ri F'• O GfDr}' ~ Ul (~ K G O G O {], ri U1 G U1 ~ G r• a r• m KSG~ O n ct G N r• w a~ rr ~ fn n G G "Onrsnr+ ~ cn o M G K ~ n a Hn ~ G ~ ~m E M(D cno rom m K ~
a G O sr r m M O Q,
n a m ~m xnC ~' h7 rt G O
m n crmo~c nm cn
o a n rt rt
n ~ sr ~ m 'U-
a rt
H ~ a
K ~
a
r•
N
CA (A ;i7 :~ z ro ro N U] ro~ ro~ N b.7 c., c., e ro d~ r 3 H c.~ Z1 'TJ H H H~ -I ~-I ~-, 3 r h7 r
a s (D (D ~• N• N G G O C G G G a G G O fD K G r• a G G (D N a G G G C G W (D G F+-
I--'F°'MMC~,r'i~'C Cbro"o ~ O•~ ~--,a ~ ~ K~~~~ r*~'V Kra ~ ~ ~ ~ NN•a m afD (D G G r• cD E '~ (D ~-+ G F-' (D fD a (!~ G (D "C a rt -•~• rt G b fD '•C G m ~ fDU~ G G~ O b i --~• U~ t0 rt O n to r- v~ K r• r• G a K rt N G
H C2, Q, tCa d O rt I~• ro n rr rt x G cn r• G G' (p (~, (p fD rtn N iQ i-+ a 7d to w (DHa ~ (D Q, rS fD a K O rt N O G (D K n to O N• N G O (D (D G aaxMr"L7 ~ K xr•• ro ~•K a m~ c roc rt zN o nos K K a~
x o ~a rtM 7s'N ~ ~ ~c ~~•~•a ~• dam MI-•~(D m c c ~ ~
rJ rS ~ E O !/~ a ~ H fp N• t~• ~ n n 'Z3 n (D D.. a ~ r• r• n
U (D t7" G rS G ro r'I G G K rtn Cn ~ a (D fD fD n N• ro .P ~ H n n (D b7
D M ~'' G ~ ~'t ri I-' r• r5 U1 N• (D O n F•-' ri O a O "O H fD cD a
MG o ~o o can a ~ a"~ m cn ort a cn n rt~ ~ ~
G GEC a E o K ~' ~~ ~ m u, ~•a ~ z x~ rr mm ~o a ~ n n Mo a sz a Ica
CL O, n K cn C K cn m rr o G Q, CL a bd o 3 ~ 'L3mmm ~n cu ro ~• n cn Y• G l hr ~ a aromriGorort~ o Q,r~E K ~o~ ro ccr ~ -oac~ amo is
r- a ~• ~ w K~ n ~ "C ~ r a MrtnF+- M ~ ~ O n O r• --~ ~ O
m n m ~ m ~ ~ rt m n
a m ~ a rr ~c ,r
rt [n ~ rt K rp '~
O ~ a ac ~ w G'0 0 o n a G n oOcnrtNN ~' G
M N G- G (D
o a ro cn
n ~ ~
n
au o
lfl G
A N fZ,
F-' W W I-~ 1-+ W J H fA
l0 lb N W i--~ I--+ W Ul l0 ~1 O ~ N ~A 61 .p N !-~ N F••~ N to
W N V1H+UlF-'NUIN W lDN lJlNdllJlO~l~ll0 d161W I-~lb~A~~~NF-+.p(JlF-+U1Oo~AO W O61(J~W W N61~Alflll~l0001flO0Dlfl~1NNO~lO~POd100OU'ilO0oO0~OD
1~1O~PO1-' WNInWN~IOOIO W W OII~IQ~tU'ilOOlflNOOOONOIJ~NI-~~1~10610WOOdIE--~OO~1cnOO~~110OOOO0olnOOlOOOOOdIONOD61O~A
CJ L1
CrJ z
C] CI]
x x
z r
O
d
H
Cn
b7
C;
Cn
C1]
3
z
H y
W W
cn
C
Cn
d
H
O
b
z
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
U7 CJi U'i lJ7 Ul lJl U1 lTt Ul Ul CJ1 Ul V1 V1 Ul (J~
W W W W W W W W W W N N N N N N
1000~1d1Cri~p W Nf-'OlSJ00Jdl V7~P
q] ~ O~~ x r x y n H H m ~n ~n CrJ
C a N• r• a (D a tT O O G rt rt n
ts~ ~nrtNn E g ~~ ~~cn m E
C rt~ C r•'U (p ~ N a r• r-
n ~~m u, a cn~ n~ a
r~•cu roa ~n~c x ~~ n ~
a N fn r• g rt [n H O O O G• x 0 N 3
rt rt~•m rn~ ~ o ~•~ o
a~cmm~m ~tsrn"Cx -~
x G a a rt~ rp H a ~ rt m rt
a (D n~ a to a~ n G 7~' I to ~
n ri N• cn rt a "C ~•C H n O
cz a ~ m ,~ ~ a n ~
m G ~ a> rn m m
a tr ro M m n
n arr• o m a ~•c
m m n o
n rt a ro n
a m n o
rt r•
G
o rt
a N•
C!1 ~-I ~-I 7 N h] 70 :~1 [xl I L~ '~ 3 -C (A (A
c c G o~ G m m n o a ~~•o o a
v ~~tzm ~ro a ~ ~ ~G rn~
73 "C"C Cam I ~~mrtrtm
N r• 10 (~ r• in rt p r• a ~' Cf' fn
u,cn rta -~n a G ~~ a
cu~•cu u~n~~• axcnmmH~H
Ui Nn r• Q,G'~]Q,a I Na
fD C O ~ N a tT C'1 3 rn x
a r•G H ;U a 'LJ ~ "C r• ~' N
ri ~i1 n m s3• rt rt m ~ x r• ,.q ~
Z3 G "C3 a G H n ~ G rt r• rfi
a D r• m r• a Q, N 'Z3 C
N•r• t7 ri ~4 G N ~ G
n rt m Gn rnNSa,
c~•o a o~
O o rn N n rt
a
rt m C n
g rn O 't7 N
mmt~r ~ ~
a m ~ a
rtma rt ro
rt m n
0
rn st
H m n
0 o a
H A ~
r
cn r
1 }-~ 1-' F•~ N 1--+ I--~ N d~ dl
A H' tTi ,p l0 CTt W W N N F-' W Ol lJt 00 W
N NOIONO~W d1~PWO~AIONUtWUt
t NO~AlONOO0NO61~AlONQ~OD
0~ 01 0 1fl d1 Ul d~ O ~ 00 O Cn ~) t0 O t•-= .A
n
x
C17
7
x
z
0
H
t:~
C
t~
d
H
O
O
z
3
O
C
z
H
13 Jul 1343 paid Register page i
Thu iC+,42 AM City c+f Falcon Heights
Pay pay
k. Empiayee Empiayee pay 6raup 6rou3 Check
C+176t?5 u G.CsO 14-Jul-d9 VEiB
C+17606 0 0, 00 14-Jul-89 vOIB
017607 000000002 itiiessner, Janet R.13 0'l semi-rnanthly 1,3is.c:8 14-Jui-83 Gutstanding
C+17603 000006004 i(riegier, Canal .~.13 ui semi-manthiy 310.2 14-Jul-89 Outstanding
017609 OCK}t100011 Chenaweth, Shirley U.13 O semi-monthly 752. i7 14-Jul-BS Gutstanding
017616 riJ000002U Iverson, Terry J.13 U1 semi-me+ntnly 846.29 14-Jui-85 Gutstandinc
017611 6x6x6027 Mangan, Ja_y ~i.i3 xi sear-manthiy 768. i9 14-Jui-83 Outstanding
017612 600000x'9 Wright, Vincent B.13 C+1 semi-monthly 61.36 14-Jui-83 Outstanding
017fii3 x60000041 Neumann, i{ristine i_.i3 O1 serci-mar,thly 245.61 14-Jul-89 Gutstanding
017514 000000045 Marshall, Timothy 13 C+1 semi-mar+thly 361.56 14-Jul-89 Outstanding
0176:5 000000050 ttubes, Jc+r~ E.13 01 semi-rnanthly 339.26 14-Jul-83 Outstanding
017616 OC+0000063 Phillips, Patricia A.13 01 semi-manthiy 646.0tr 14-Jul-83 Gutstanding
x17617 00000Cr665 iceiiy, Thomas ,v.13 1 semi-monthly 812.05 i4-J~1-89 Outstanding
017618 000000066 bagenho'tm, tiarin W.13 U1 semi-monthly 435.11 14-Jul-83 Outstanding
017619 000000068 5uppes, Jean.13 61 semi-monthly 334.17 14-Jul-d3 Outstanding
017620 000000072 Carlson, Carol 13 01 semi-monthly 174.86 14-Jui-89 Gutstanding
017621 000000076 Glson, Rod L.i3 O1 semi-manthiy 161.86 14-Jul-83 Outstanding
17622 000000077 pc+sel, Amy i_i3 01 semi-manthiy 62.05 14-Jui-89 Outstanding
017623 000000078 l~ickelsen, Tc+r~y J.13 Oi semi-monthly 222.55 14-Jul-89 Outstanding
017624 tr00000079 Hoyt Taff', Susar+ L.13 01 semi-rncmtiliy 244.10 14-Jul-83 Outstandine
017625 C+60660063 8aurnann, tJichoias R,7 02 monthly 294,98 14-Jul-83 Outstanding
0176c.'6 OC+0000005 Aerndt, Ross 7 02 rnanthly 1 188.76 14-Jul-83 Outstanding
017627 000Crx0066 Bianchi, David p.7 02 me+nthiy 1 6.25 i4-JuI-89 Outstanding
8 0006x0+;167 Bianchi, Joseph B.7 02 rnanthly 1 61.38 14-Jui-89 Outstandirr;
6~9 0x00x00C+8 drown, riayrnand F.7 02 rnor;thly 1 358.01 14-Jui-89 Gutstanding
017630 Cr(+001X+013 ula!^icin, Michael J.7 02 rnanthly 1 167.38 14-Jul-89 Gutstanding
017631 000000014 Jaw, Michael J.7 02 mar:thly 1 302. i8 14-Jul-89 Gutstanding
0176x'2 000000015 Bowdeil, Raiah ~.7 02 rnar+thzv 1 8b. 75 i4-Jul-83 Outstanding
017633 600000016 Fuller. Barnes B.7 02 rnanthly 1 201.00 14-Jul-83 Gutstanding
x}17634 000000013 Holmgrery John +i. Sr.7 62 monthly 1 213.38 14-Jui-89 Outstanding
017635 000x60t121 t',urhaJetz, Element ~t.7 02 mar:thiy 1 217.50 14-Jul-63 Gutstanding
017636 O0C:000022 LeMay, Bennis U.7 02 monthly 1 80.13 14-Jui-89 Outstanding
017617 C+{+0000023 LeMay. Baugias 7 02 monthly i y3.64 14-Jui-89 Outstanding
0176x8 000000024 Lirn;ig, Leo 7 02 mar;thly 1 70.29 14-3u1-83 Gutstanding
417633 00C+000025 McBermond, Cindy tt.7 62 manthiy 1 96,27 14-Jui-89 Gutstanding
017646 000000026 McNabo, Herald 7 02 rnanthly 1 13.13 14-Jui-89 Gutstandint+
017641 006000029 Glsory Jaseph E.7 02 manil-cly 1 202.50 14-Jul-83 Outstanding
1117642 000000032 Schaefer, Richard A.7 02 manthiy 1 16.88 i4-Jul-89 Outstanding
0:7643.000000033 Schauffert, Craig F.7 62 monthly 1 132.51 14-Jul-83 Gutstanding
017644 6000{X+634 Smida,. Iaail 7 02 manthiy 1 6.25 14-Jul-83 Gutstanding
017645 0000x0035 Mangan, Jay 7 02 manthiy 1 229. i3 14-Jul-83 Gutstanding
01764b 000000040 P;ayser, Jauglas 7 02 monthly 1 117.50 14-Jul-83 Gutstanding
017647 000666042 5taiz, Steven p,>-7 02 rnanthly 1 58.75 i4-Jul-89 Outstanding
017648 000000045 6ii~ert, Jerarne .;.7 02 monthly 1 177.2:,14-JuI-89 Gutstanding
17643 666601'+646 Nairngrer+, ,;ahn ~i. Jr.7 62 rnanthly 1 217.63 14-Jul-d3 Gutstanding
017650 0UC+000047 Mcfvabd, Kevin 7 02 manthiy 1 167.5£14-Jul-89 Outstanding
017651 060600049 Anderson, Kevin L,7 02 rnanthly 1 169.13 14-Jul-89 Gutstandin
017652 006600664 PETERSO~l, tiftEGORY S.7 02 monthly 1 46.64 14-JuI-83 Outstanding
5~J0xCr60663 ^;artinez, Jaseph L.7 62 me+nth~ay 1 163.13 14-Jui-83 outstanding
Grand Tc+tal 13,166.23
Consent X
Policy
CI
U
CIY'! ~ FALCQN HEIGATS
REQUEST l'~ C(}UNCIL CONSIDERATION
Agenda Item: E-2
Meeting Dater 7/26/89
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Ratification of Increase in 1989 Sealcoating Cost
SUBMITTED BY:S _ Chenoweth
REVIEWED BY:
ERPLANATION/SUMMARY attach s+dd3ti~al sheets as necessary):
On July 3rd,Terry Maurer ca lled explaining that additional
alley patchi ng had been deemed necessary and recommended the
work be done at an estimated cost of $1,800 to $2,000.
Council was polled (4 out of 5 members were reached) and the
expenditure was authorized.
This item is being presented at this .time for ratification
only.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval.
Consent X
Policy
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
CITY ~ FAZ.COl~: BEI6HTS
REQUEST'?CO~CIL CONSIDERATION
Agenda Item:
E-3
Meeting Date:7~26/89
Designation of streets to be posted "No Parking,
Tow Away Zone" during State Fair
S. Chenoweth
ERPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach add3~iana2 sheets as necessary):
The following list of streets to be posted "No Parking"
during the State Fair is the same as in previous years.
1. All of Northome Addition, water side
2. All of Hollywood Court including alley
3. St. Mary's, Fry, Maple Knoll Dr. and Garden Ave. west of
Snelling on both sides .
4. All streets north of Larpenteur, between Snelling and
Hamline running to Roselawn, except Holton, Albert and
Sheldon north of Ruggles, water side
5. Tatum, 1,300 feet north of Larpenteur
6. Lindig on Waterside including the cul-de-sacs
7. Larpenteur Ave. from Snelling to Cleveland
8. Snelling Drive north and southbound and Snelling Ave.
both sides.
ACTION REQUESTED:
i ~av
Consent X
Policy CITY aF FALCON BEIGATS
BEQUES? COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Agenda Item: E-4
Meeting Dater 7/26/89
ITEM DESCRIPTION:Memo dated 7/17/89 regarding the North Suburban
Cable Commission's move from City Hall
SUBMITTED BY:Bootsie Anderson, Cable Administrator
REVIEWED BY:
EXPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sbtets as necessary):
See attached Memo
ACTION REQUESTED:
NORTH SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION
i77 WEST LARPENTEUR AVENUE FALCON HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA SS 113 (612) 646-8172
DATE: July 17, 1989
T0: Janet Wiessner, Mayor Tom Baldwin, Falcon Heights City Council
FROM: Bootsie Anderson, NSCC Administrator
RE: North Suburban Cable Commission Office Move
The past S-I- years have given us the opportu~aity to build a great
deal of cooperative work;-ngs as well as some great friendships.
The ltiorth Suburban Cable Comrmission would like to thank the Gity
of Falcon Heights for being so accommodating aver the years.
The Commission office will be completely moved on or before
September 1, 1989.
Again, thank you for your hospitality over the years.
Sincerely,
Bootsie Anderson
Administrator
North Suburban Gable Commission
BA/cjp
Arden Hills • Falmn Heights • Lauderdale • Little Canada • Mounds View • New Brighton + North Oaks • Roseville • St. Anthony • Shoreview
Consent.. X
Policy CITY OF FALCON liEIGATS
BEQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Agenda Item: E-5
Meeting Date: 7/26/89
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Planning Commission Minutes of July 10, 1989
SUBMITTID BY: Planning Commission
REVIEWED BY: ~ S . Chenoweth
EXPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as aecessary):
See Minutes attached.
I
ACTION REQUESTED:
MINUTES
REGULAR PLANNING OONIl~7ISSION MEETING
JULY 10, 1989
Chairman Black called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
Barry, Black, Boche, Carroll, Daykin, Duncan and Grittner. Also
present were Planners Susan Hoyt Taff and Tim Malloy, and Administrator
Wiessner.
Nestingen and Finegan.
Duncan moved, seconded by Daykin, to approve the June 5, 1989 Minutes
as presented. Motion carried unanimously.
H. Leonard Boche, 1776 Fry Street, requested a Permitted Accessory
Use for a Utility Shed to be located in the southeast corner of his
lot five feet from his property line. Construction will be as indicated
in the diagram he attached to his application and indicated the structure
will be painted green to blend with its surroundings.
Carroll moved, seconded by Daykin, to approve the Permitted Accessory
Use as requested. Motion carried unanimously.
Barry arrived at 7:44 P.M.
Chairman Black opened the Public Hearing at 7:45 P.M. an the Request
for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a parking lot in R-1 Single
Family District as requested by Dennnis Hunt on a lot owned by George
Peck, 1546 Crawford Avenue. Such Public Hearing Notice was published
in the Focus Newspapers at June 28, 1989.
Barry questioned whether the conditional use request should be considered
based upon the fact that Mr. Hunt does owe back property taxes.
Also, the future use of the shopping center should be considered
before acting on the request.
After further discussion, Carroll ~a!ved, seconded by Barry, to continue
the Public Hearing to August 7, l~ if, and only if, Mr. Hunt has
provided the necessary requested information. Motion carried unanimously.
Dave Black and Planner Malloy reviewed the background of the Code
Amendments as chronologically Iisted in the agenda attachments.
Planner Malloy stated that the Plaming Cotmission may want to reconsider
its action taken at its June 5th mewing in its motion for a code
amendment change on page two, paragraph three, to use the conditional
use permit process. TY-e use of the conditional use permit in this
instance may be awkward because it requires every accessory structure
on a corner lot to be put through the conditional use process which
means requiring a public hearing and fees associated with the request.
At the last meeting some Commission members had also expressed concern
about the criteria and felt there ues a better way to handle such
situations.
PRESENT
ABSENT
6/5/89
MINUTES
APPROVID
LEONARD
PERMITTID
ACCESSORY
USE
APPROVED
PUBLIC
HEARING
REQUESTED
BY DENNIS
PINUID
CODE
AMENDMENTS
Minutes
Regular Planning Commission Meeting
July 10, 1989
Page 2
Chairman Black then opened the Public Hearing at 8:30 P.M. on Code.
Amendments to Section 9-4.01, Subdivision 4, and Section 9-2.04,
PUBLIC
HEARING
Subdivision 1(c). Such Public Hearing Notice was published in the ON CODE
Focus Newspapers on June 28, 1989.AMENDMENTS
9-4.01,
Council Liaison Wallin arrived at 8:39 P.M.SUBD. 4,
9-2.04,
Planner Tim Malloy reviewed the Code Amendment changes made on Jane SUBD. 1(c}
5, 1989 and made suggestions €or other options that might be considered ADID
instead of using the conditional use process.9-2.04,
SUBD. 2(d)
There being no one wishing to be heard, Chairman Black closed the APPROVED
Public Hearing at 8:50 P.M.
Carroll moved, seconded by Duncan, that the third paragraph of Page
2 (Accessory buildings, including garages, on a corner lot in a residential
district, may be located within the corner side yard subject to a
conditional use permit. The issuance of such permits shall comply
with the .provision in Section 9-15.04 of this Code (conditional uses}.
Design and placement of such structures must be consistent with the
surrounding residential district, and shall be evaluated based on
the following criteria: visibility, height, safety and potential
distraction to passing motorists.) be stricken and the following
language substituted: Garages on a corner lot in a residential. district
shall have the same corner side yard setback as the principal structure.
If required setback allows garage to be placed less than. l5 feet
from the corner side lot line, this is permissible only if vehicular
access door faces either the alley or interior lot line.
After a discussion, the motion was approved subject to editing by
Planner Malloy that would create no substantive change.
Boche moved, seconded by Carroll, an amendment to Section 9-2.04,
Subdivision 2 (d) as follows: d. Through Lot: The minimum setback
from the rear street or-~ey lot line of a through lot shall be
thirty (30) feet. Motion carried unanimously.
Daykin requested an illustration be used in Section 9-2.04 of our
Code similar to the one used by the City of Minnetonka as was presented
to the Planning Commission by Planner Malloy.
Carroll moved, seconded by Boche, approval of Code Amendments to
Section 9-4.01, Subdivision 4, Section 9-2.04, Subdivision 1(c) and
Section 9-2.04, Subdivision 2(d) to be considered by the City Council
as a block of changes. Motion carried unanimously.
Minutes
Regular Planning Commission Meeting
July 10, 1989
Boche moved, seconded by Carroll, to adjourn the meeting at 9:17 AATOURNMENT
P.M. Motion carried unanimously.
Submmitted by:
Katherine J. Zimmerman
Approved:
Edgar Finegan, Secretary
Zoning Ordinance
Section 300.10.
Page 42
SIIB D I V I S I ON 6. ADI~I'~~~. RETIREMENTS .
a ) A 11 dwe 11 ings , iac38~ a~~sfactured homes , shal 1 have
a depth of at lei; 2`t3 feet. for at Ieast 50 percent of
their width. 813. ~elTi~s. including manufactured
homes , shal l ha~re a~ ~rie~th of at least 20 feet for at
least 50 percent of t8etir depth.
b) All dwellings shsil' have a permanent foundation in
conformance with ttte l~naesot~r state building code.
c) Accessory structures'. sha31 confora to the setbacks
established for prfne3pal structures . except for_ the
following:
1' ) sl l accessary s#a-uctures located more than 10 feet
from a priacl structure may be located a
minimum of 1@ feet from a rear or side lot line;
and
2) all accessory structures except detached garageswhicharelocatedbetweentheprincipalstructure
and the front. lot lime shall maintain a minimum
setback of 50 feet. On corner lots, swimmingpoolsshallbesub,ect to front yard setbacks
established fete principal structures. (Amended by
Ordinance 87-458,. 1-20-87.)
3) Sheds or storssge buildings less than 120 squarefeetinsizeshallbelocatedbehindtherear
building line ®f the house. (Amended by Ordinance
87-450, 1-20-87.j
d) Off-street parking shall be provided for at least two
vehicles for sll single family dwellings. A suitable
location for a garage measuring at least 20 feet by 24
feet which does aot require a variance shall be
provided and indicated as such on a survey or site plantobesubmittedwhenapplyingforabuildingpermitto
construct a new dwelling or alter an existing garage.
SIIBDIVISION 7. ~"EJCCEPTIONS FOR {iIIALIFYING SMALL LOTS.
a) The buildable status of R-1 lots is determined in
accordance with Section 300.07, Subdivision 1, b. If a
substandard lot has been declared buildable, the
provisions of this subdivision (Section 300.10,
Subdivision 7) may be applied. (Added by Ordinance
88-500. 7-20-88.) '
Zoning Ordinance ,
Section 300.10.
Page 43
b) In recognition of the exceptional circumstances of
nonconforming small lots located in neighborhoods of
similarly sized lots, the R-1 district setback
standards shall be reduced for lots meeting the
following criteria: (Amended by Ordinance 88-500
7-20-88)
1) less than 15,000 square feet;
2) lot of .record as of February 12, 196b or lots
approved by the city subsequent to~this date; and
Amended by Ordinance 87-450, 1-20-87.)
3) located in an area in which the average size of
all residential Lots within 400 feet is less than
15,000 square feet. (Amended by Ordinance 88-500,
7-20-88.)
c) The following standards shall apply to principal
structures located on qualifying small Iots:
1) Front yard setback: average front setback of
principal structures located on adjoining parcels,
but in no case less than 20 feet from the
right-of-way. (Figure 15)
2) Side yard setback: 10 percent of lot width
measured at the building setback line on each side
of the structure, but in no case Less than seven
feet. (Figure 15}
3) Rear yard setback: 20 percent of lot depth, but
in no case less than seven feet. (Figure 15)
I~~~ 1 i l i~~ I ~„~b~s~+g ~nXiurai
rl;mD s{• • ltmo.a . , ~l,ooo ~~ `3j'
eo~~T ~'"~ tiooosad
o~i~surr~ sn~uure
e~+sTu+y svev~v~vo~+
Zoning Ordinance
Section 300.10.Page 44
d) The following standardsstructureslocated shall apply to accessory15) on qualifying small lots: (Figure
1) Front yard setback:structure, same as for principal
2) Side yard setback: seven feet.
3) Rear yard setback: seven feet.
e
i
I
I
I
i
I
Consent x
Policy CITY OF FALCON HEIGATS
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Agenda Item: E-6
1~leeting Date: ~ 26 89
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Licenses
SUBMITTED BY: S . Chenoweth
REVIEWED BY:
EXPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necesearp};
General Contractors Licenses:
Ken's Roofing #353
3600 Minnehaha Ave. S.
Mpls., MN
John Beissel Inc. #356
153 ,E. Thompson Ave.
West St. Paul, MN
Concept Designs Builders, Inc. #346
305 Snail Lake Rd.
Shoreview, MN
R.A.O. Construction #355
2616 Avon
Roseville MN
All are new except R.A.O.
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval
Consent
policy X
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Agenda Item: F-1
Meeting Date:~~26/89
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Amendments to Sections 9-4.01., Subd. 4; 9-2.04
Subd. 1(c) and Subd. 2(b) and (d) of Chapter 9 of
the. City Code
SUBMITTED BY: Planning Commission
REVIEWED BY: Planning Commission
Tim Malloy
Susan Hoyt-Taff
ERPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary):
Over the past several months. the Planning Commission and City
Council reviewed and revised residential setback requirements
for principal .and accessory structures in Chapter 9 of the
City Code to accomodate the changing needs of Falcon Heights
residents without routinely granting variances.. The following
sections of the Code are included in the residential setback
review.
Recommended by the Planning Commission on M-~ 1, 1989
Adopted ~ the City Council on May 9, 1989
ATTACHMENT A - 9-2.02 Non-conforming Uses, Buildings and
Structures
Subd. 2 - Preservation of Dimensionally Substandard
Buildings or Structures
Subd. 8 - Repairs and Alterations (b) Permitted Use
Subd. 9 - Additions and Enlargements (a) Permitted Use
Recommended by the Planning Commission on July 10, 1989
ATTACHMENT B: 9-4.01, Subd. 4, Lot Area, Height, Lot Width and
Yard Requirements
A~1"1'ACHMENT C: 9-2®04, Subd. 1(c) General
Subd. 2(b) Area
Subd. 2(d) Through Lots
ATTACHMENT D: Memo from Tim Malloy summarizing recommendations,
action to date.
David Black will present the recommendations. Tim Malloy is
available to answer questions.
ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve amendments to Oity Code.
t
ADOPTED 5/9/89
ATTACHMENT A
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9-2.02 OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO NON-CONFORMING USES, BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURS
9-2.02 Non-Conforming Uses Buildings and Structures. Subdivision
2. Preservation of Dimensionally Substandard Buildings or
Structures. Except as hereinafter provided in this Section,
buildings or structures lawfully existing on the effective
date of this Code may be maintained although such buildings
or structures lawfully existing on the effective date of
this Code may be maintained although such building or structure
does not conform to the dimensional standards of this Code.
Any such building or structure shall not be altered ar improved
beyond normal maintenance. However, in cases where the principal
structure or garage is legally non-conforming with respect
to corner side yard and interior side yard setbacks, an addition
to the principal structure or garage may be allowed providing
the proposed addition does not encroach further into the
corner side yard or interior side yard lot lines than the
existing principal structure or garage, and providing that
such addition meets all other requirements of this Code.
Subdivision 8. Repairs and Alterations.
b) Permitted Use: Repairs, alterations, and structural
changes may be made to a non-conforming building or structure,
all or substantially all of which is designed or intended
for a use permitted in the district in which it is located.
Such repairs, alterations, or structural changes shall conform
to the regulations of the district in which said building
or structure is located except as permitted in Section 9-2.02,
Subdivision 2, relating. to interior side yard or corner side
yard setbacks.
Subdivision 9. Additions and Enlargements.
a) Permitted Use: A non-conforming building or structure
which is non-conforming as to area, and is designed or intended
for a permitted use, shall not be added to or enlarged in
any manner unless such additions or enlargements are made
to conform to all of the regulations of the district in which
it is located, except as permitted in Section 9-2.02, Subdivision
2, relating to interior side yard or corner side yard setbacks.
All non-conforming buildings or structures, including all
additions and enlargements shall conform to this Code.
This ordinance passed this 9th day of May, 1989, and shall
become effective following its publication.
ATTACHMENT B
PROPOSED
Subdivision 4.Lot Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements.
a. No structure or building shall exceed two (2) stories
or twenty-five (25) feet in height above ground level,
whichever is lesser in height, except as provided
in Section 9-2.07 of this Chapter.
b . ~.s~~~a~~--a~trt~-wag-~-st~~e~ct-arc}~-~tvt-~-}mss--ti~~ar~
ee~. A side yard abutting a street shall
be at least 20 percent of the width of the lot.
c. The following minimum requirements shall be observed
subject to the additional requirements, exceptions
and modifications as set forth inthis Section and
Section 9-2.03.
Front Side Rear
F~e~-c~~ Lot Area Lot Width Yard Yard Yard
t~~y 10,000 sq. ft. 75' interior 30' S' 30'
lot
90' corner
a-~t~~}mss ~A~-04A-•sf}-r-€~ . ~~--~R~t~ie~~ 3E~L ~.-5' 39'
e ~.
99-'--ee~•fre~-~-et
Flexibility may be provided by allowing the side vard to
be decreased to a minimum of-three feet if a maintenance
easement is recorded on the deeds of all. affected roperties.
No fences or significant landscaping could be installed
in the easement areas).
Attachment C
PROPOSED.
Section 9-2.04 Accessory Buildings and Structures Subdivision 1. General c.
eet €re~e ~~e-~i~~st ~i~c~~ri~ac~3)-€ee~ $f t-h~-fea=--let ~i~rc~ Accessory
buildings, other than garages in a residential district may be located not less
than five feet from an interior side or rear lot line unless the accessory structure
is located in the rear twenty percent of the lot, in which case they can be located
not less than ene foot from the interior side or wear lot li*+e (overhangs may not
extend into the one foot side or rear yard setback).
Garages in a residential district may be located not less than five feet from an
interior side or rear lot line unless they are located in the rear twenty percent
of the lot, adjacent to an alley and oriented such that the vehicular access door
does not face the alley in which case they can be located not less than one foot
CORNER LOTS
The corner side yard setback for accessory. buildings, including garages, shall
adhere to the setback requirement for principal buildings as described in .Section
9-4.01 Subd 4(b) (20% of the lot width). The rear yard and interior side yard
setbacks shall be those required for garages and accessory buildings on interior
lots. Lots smaller than 75 feet will have a minimum corner side yard setback re-
quirement less than 15 feet. Garages on these lots may be located closer than 15
feet from the corner side lot line if the vehicular access door does not face the
side street. In no case shall a garage or other accessory building be located within
the corner side yard.
9-2.04 Subd 2 (b) •
b. Area: No detached accessory building shall occupy more than -
thirty five percent }-35X of the area of a required rear yard.
9-2.04 Subd. 2(d)
d. Through Lot: The minimum setback from the rear sr=.=t =_ ;~~o=~ ~~~~ lot line
of a through lot shall be thirty (30) feet.
ATTACHMENT D
t `~
r
i
aMCar=~;,-~.
C02~5 PLA?JNER.~
LAI•:I~ ARCHITECTS
300 }7~,'ST' ~3'E13UE 1JOxTH
SUITE X819
MII~iAII~;AI~tS, ~11h'+ 55~~;
612 3~8a~
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 21 July 1989 '
TO: Honorable Mayor and C~ f Members
V
FROM: Tim Malloy, Planning ~ ~.
RE: Summary of Residential ~An-lendment Process
BACKCROtTND
Over the course of the past several ~.~ave been working with the Planning
Commission on a variety of issues. g them, and the subject of our review
this evening, has been the amendm'City's Residential Setback Standards, in
response to the changing needs and the citizehs of Falcon Heights.
A recent Supreme C;ocrt decision a precedent making it prudent for
municipalities to insure that their lal~ad zoning regulations are administered
fairly, and that complete and acrura~Iamrda are kept during the process of
administering planning and zoning ~i "mt~~wanson vs. Bloomington). This has made
the job of dealing with the already ria fer variances in the State Statutes
more difficult! With this i~l mind, a>~iilg the number of variance requests the
City has received for minor impro as sheds, fences, and garages in the last
few years, it made sense to recon~i~aek standards.
During the derision process, which the recommended amendments you will be
reviewing, the Plarring Commissia~ed many variables. One of them was the
desire to balance the changing nee~idents with the policies in the
Comprehensive Plan. In the Plan, >.adopted in 1980, a high priority was
placed on the preservatioi of a "srltl~"~t'~rillage" atmosphere. Although these
terms are not defined they inspire marrow, tree lined streets, small lots, and
relatively small, well maintained hc~rs.,character of much of the older portions
of Falcon Heigtlts reflect these idea. Ali town" atmosphere could be
threatened if new more relaxed s e:adopted which encourage improvements
more suited to suburban scale lots. lsafety with respect to sight distances for
vehicular and pedestrian traffic were.ai^~idered. Ordinances from several
r
Mayor and City Council Members Page 2
communities: with similar conditions w;;rc reviewed and alternative standards were
considered. The wording of these amendments was also carefully written to avoid
contradictions with other sections of the Code and to assure they would be correctly
interpreted.
CHRONOLOGY
By the April Plan.-ung Commission meeting, the details ofl~ amendments were worked
out and a motion to recommend the amendments to ~ouneal was approved.
Unfortunately; the pacY.age you received on May 9th dici ~t iaclude a key portion of
the proposed amendments; Section 9-4.01 Subdivision 4{b} sand 4(c). These are the
sections which establish the corner side yard setback at ~ scent of the lot width,
rnd revise the sine zrd r:~r yard se~.ba~its for inie:ior k>isshowir Oil the u-iciosul
copies of the recommended amendments. Therefore, wh+d~~ "reviewed the setbacks for
accessory structures you did not have the information rel the proposed corner side
yard setback (20 }.~rcent of lot width). At this point, the s'ter was referred back to
the Flannina Commission with a sketch illustrating the Cot's intent with respect to
setbacks 2nd a s»geestior, that the conditional use permit process be considered as a.
me*hod to contn~l the setcacks for accessory structures on garner lots.
In respense to the Council's suggestions, the Planning Conunssion reconsidered the issue
at the June Planning ~_.:,mmissi~n meeting. A.s a result, thtwording of the setback
standards nor accessoryy Structures vas modified by removing the word "corner"from
both paragraphs in the proposed amendment to Section 92fi4 Subdivision 1(c) . The ~'
revised wording ndv applies the one foot standard to yarda:A through E as illustrated
on the sketch. from the Council. The concept of using the conditional use process ujas
also reviewed and approved by a 4 to 3 vote.
Lt was after this neetizg that David Black, Jan Wiesaner, and i determined that the
Council did not have the complete package when they reviewed the setbacks a,;d
referred the issue back. to the Commission. The siSa~ of this can be understood
if you consider the impact of the following. Section 9-2.44_.~ubdivi.~ion 2 (e) requirea
accessory structure on a corner lot to recP ct the setback 4`~tablished for the prtnctpat
structure or. the lot. Since we had revised the corner side ~tard setback for principal
structL: es to 20 percent of the lot width (from 30 feet} we ~'ectively modified the
wrner side yard :setback at the sar-:e time. Thi, tranxtatesto a corner side yard
setback fur as:esso~tV structures of 10 feet fora 50 foot lot, 32 feet fora 60 foot
lot, etc.
y
CURR;`'.NT PROPOSED A11'iENI}hiE\"I'S
At this months Planning Commission meeting, the matted described above and the option
of using the conditional use permit for controlling comer s~cie yard setbacks was
discussed further, before the opening of the Public Hearit~, :I reiterated my
recommendation that while the conditional use permit can tae used to control setback
standards, and in fact is used in exactly this manner eLsewbere in the City's ordinance,
it is an awkv~~ard tool for controlling such standards in a residential situation for two
reasons: 1) It requires a fee for every application 2) It requires a public hearing.
Designing a standard that accomplishes the desired effect is a much easier solution to
administer. The Commission believed, as I do, that, for mast ituations, the 20 percent
Mayor and City Council Members Page 3
corner side yard standard for accessory structures allows the"~xibility necessary for
making improvements, on corner lots, without sacrificing safety or the aesthetic appeal
of adequate corner side yards. However, we also recommend Ott for lots less than 75
feet, where the 20 percent standard will allow a garage closer ~ the corner side lot
line than 15 feet, side yards narrower than 15 feet should o~ntyb~e aIlowed when the
vehicular access door does not face the street. This provides sac sight distances for
vehicular traffic entering onto side streets from corner lots'and.::alleys.
Finally, rather than achieving this standard by reference through Section 9-2.04
Subdivision 2 (e)`pa paragraph was drafted describing the ~ far accessory structures
on corner lets which would be included as the third paragraph in the amendment to
Section 9-2.04 Subdivision 1(c )j.
When considered in their e12irctg•, tl;c proposed amendm+e~ts~p~resent a reasonable
comprehensivL solu'i:,n to the setbacks issue, and we tha~~'submit them as such for
your review.
Consent Agenda Item: F-2
Policy °CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
Meeting Date: 7/26/89
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Re-schedule August 23 City Council Meeting
SUBMITTED BY: Jan Wiessner
REVIEWED BY:
EXPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary):
On August 23, the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce is
sponsoring their annual Twins Ni ght. This event has been
well attended for the past 2 yea rs by Councilmembers and
staff .
ACTION REQUESTED: Consider re-scheduling Council meeting.
Consent
Policy X
r
L
CITY OF PALCON HEIGATS
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Agenda Item: F-3
Meeting Date: 7/26/89
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Hamline Avenue Project - Local Feasibility Study
SUBMITTED BY: Terry .Maurer
REVIEWED BY: ~ Jan Wiessner
EXPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary):
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Memo from T. Maurer, 7/20/89
B. Feasibility Study (Yellow cover)
ACTION REQUESTED: ( 1 } Adopt Feasibility Study
2) Schedule Public Improvement Hearing
late August)
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maier Stewart & Associates Inc.
T0: FALCON HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL
FROM: TERRY MAURER
SUBJECT: HAMLINE AVENUE FEASIBILITY STUDY
FILE N0: 330-016-10
DATE: JULY 20, 1989
Attached is a copy of the feasibility study for the local assessment of
costs associated with the Hamline Avenue improvements. In a brief
discussion with the Mayor, he felt it would be appropriate to complete this
prior to the new assessment policy. This is due to the fact that the old
assessment policy deals quite well with the proposed improvements. We have,
however, proposed a slight reduction in the street assessment rate based on
the draft version of the new assessment policy.
TJM/km
attachment
1959 SLOAN PLACE, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021
Consent
Policy X
r
CITY OF FALCON ~iEIGATS
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Agenda Item: F-4
Meeting Date: 7 26 89
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Schedule Council Workshop Meeting
SUBMITTED BY: Jan Wiessner and Terry Maurer
REVIEWED BY:
EXPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary):
The Council may want to schedule a workshop session
to spend some time discussing the proposed new
Assessment Policy.
ACTION REQUESTED• Consider scheduling Council Workshop.
Consent
Policq X
ITII~i ION
CITY. OF FALCON HEIGATS
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Tatum Street Sod Project - Reimbursement
Jan Wiesner
SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary):
Agenda Item:. F-5
Meeting Date: 7/26/89
The average cost per residential lot for the sod replace-
ment which was. recently completed was approximately $160.
The work included replacement of sod and approximately 4
inches of soil on the boulevard on 40 lots. (The 1987 list
identified 28 lots with dead sod.. The situation apparently
worsened.)
Some residents who had previously paid to repair their
yards have requested financial reimbursement for their
expenses.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Memo from Tim Madigan, 7/12/88
2. Excerpt of 10/12/89. Council minutes re: Cowles request,
1728 Tatum
3. Letter from G. Anderson, 1853 Tatum
4. Letter from Aiken, 1849 Tatum
5. 1987 Assessment List
6. Excerpt of 3/12/86 Council minutes re: Nilsen request,
1794 Tatum
ACTION REt~ESTED: Establish policy for resident reimbursements.
T0: TERRY MAURER
FROM: TOM MADIGAN T N`~
DATE: JULY 12, 1989
SUBJECT: TATUM STREET/ST, MARY'S STREET SOD WORK FINAL INSPECTION
During the week of July 3, 1989, the sod was placed in the boulevard on
Tatum Street and St. Mary's Street by Doug Geist, the Contractor hired by
the City to complete this work. An inspection was made by Paul Summers and
myself of the work progress.
A minimum of 4" of black dirt was placed prior to laying of the sod. Mr.
Geist delivered, as the sod was placed, a flyer prepared by Falcon Heights
indicating that water must be placed continually by residents in order to
assure proper growth. In some cases, when residents were not home, the
Contractor took it upon himself to talk to a neighbor or to locate a hose
and water it himself.
It should be noted that the islands along the commercial property on St.
Mary's, because it could not be watered, was not placed. Based upon
discussions with City staff, it was agreed that the City maintenance staff
would seed these areas later this summer when temperatures drop.
Actual quantities for placement of sod break down as follows:
Tatum Street 1683 S.Y. @ $3.86 = $6,496.38
St. Mary's .Street 123 S.Y. @ $3.86 = $ 474.78
Finally, although many of the residents who received sod, have watered it,
many have not done a sufficient enough job to date to keep some of it from
turning brown.
Specifically, the house with the garden at the corner of Larpenteur, the
apartment buildings on that same side, along with 1786, 1745, 1748, 1768,
1776 and 1809.
TJM/km
C]
MINUTES
OCTOBER 12, 1988
PAGE 2
Joyce Gimmested, owner of B and J Midway Floral, felt it wasunfairtoallowtheLionstoputsignsnearotherretailbusinesseswithtreesaleslots, as it definitely reduced thesalesatthoselotslastyear. Following the discussion,. WallinmovedadoptionofOrdinance0-88-15 which carried .unanimously.
ORDINANCE 0-88-15
AN ORDINANCE REMOVING CHRISTMAS TREE SALES LOTS FROMSECTION5-6.01 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ESTABLISHINGSECTION5-6.02 REGULATING CHRISTMAS TREE SALES LOTS
STAFF TO RESEARCH OTHER COMMUNITIES REGARDING EXEMPTION OFNON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS FOR DISCUSSION AT 11/9 MEETING
Staff was directed to obtain information from other communitiesregardingexemptionofnon-profit organizations from signpermits. The matter will be discussed further at the November9thmeeting.
REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR REPLACEMENT OF SOIL AND GRASS ONBOULEVARDAT1728TATUM
Council discussed a reimbursement request from Edna Cowles, 1728Tatum, for replacement of the boulevard sod in front of her
1 residence. wiessner explained the City did plan to replaceapproximatelyone-half of the sod in the spring of 1989;however, did not intend to remove and replace the existing soilasMrs. Cowles has done. After ~_discussion, Chenoweth moved
tha~s. Cowles ~e ~reimburseci ~t a mate ..®qual .~.~A# ~f =tee.typi 1 cost ~of "the °per -I~t sod ~r-~eg7.acement on~Ta~aKn;'=~}ie "p`~~
reimbursement will be made in the spring of 1989 after the costhasbeendetermined.
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT FOR ST. MARY'SSTREETIMPROVEMENT
Ciernia moved adoption of Resolution R-88-18 which carriedunanimously.
RESOLUTION R-88-18
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT OF $1,339.38 TOBITUASI?JOIUS CONSULTING & CONTRACTING FOR THE 1988 ST. MARY'SSTREETIMPROVEMENT
ADODPTION OF RESOLUTION REGARDING ASSESSMENT OF ST. MARY''ST.PARKING IMPROVEMENTS
Ciernia. moved adoption of Resolution R-88-1° which carriedunanimously.
RESOLUTION R-88-19
A RESOLUTION FOR THE ASSESSI~:ENT OF ST. MARY'S STREET
PARKING INPROVE~SENT COSTS TO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES, INC.
i 7 19th
Janet Weissner, City Administrator
City of Falcon Heights
2077 W. Larpenteur Ave.
Falcon Heights, Minnesota. 55113
Dear Administrator Weissner:
On returning. from an out of state
we noted the City had started replacing tl
installed when curbing was added to Tatum
In May of this year I had over 55
the curb up on my property, including the
my neighbor's driveway (Eric Larson, 1857
mission and gratitude.
1853 Tatum Street
Falcon Heights, MN 55113
July 14, 1989
vacation last week,
e poor sod and base
Street.
feet of sod1 a i d from
portion extending to
Tatum) with their per-
This was deemed necessary because, despite watering and
an inordinate amount of time and effort, the inferior sod refused
to respond and grow. (Our lawn service repeatedly has recommended
replacement of that irreparable section.)
Enclosed is copy of the statement for sodding the front
yard.. Although reference is made to "and side" yard, this was
only utilizing scrap sections of sod for patching by side door.
Since this expense was incurred because of inferior
materials and workmanship contracted by the City (and now being
corrected), I would appreciate reimbursement of that portion of
the $207.06 which would have been expended by the City of Falcon
Heights in the current resodding project. Thank you.
S i~cerel y,
Geraldine M. Anderson
STATEMENT
THERA ULT & SONS ~ ~ ~From ;
Plymouth, MN 55447
19`_1r
To ~ '
Address
City
Tsrms
T~\1
VZ L~
I0 O ~,
rv~
V
1849 Tatum St.,
Falcon Heights,Mn.,55113,
May 12,1989.
To the Mayor and City Council of Falcon Heights:
It is our understanding that the City of Falcon Heights intends to redo the
Tatum St. boulevards with a re-sodding effort to compensate for the unfortunate
shoddy specifications and wor}nnanship previously done.If this is true,the Cityistobe .commended even though it is far too Iate in many instances.
My wife and I would like to go on record that we do not want the City to do
anything to our boulevard at the above address.We-have long ago undertaken the
restoral of our boulevard,and it seems to be coming along fine.
However,we do feel that we should be compensated for the expense that weC' experienced.We would accept those monies which would have been expended on our
behalf to restore our boulevard had we not already taken care of it.
Sincerely,
CS5~i
ggS
Myles F. Aiken
1707 Pleasantview (George Berry) Apartments - 11 units ~ ~~~ ~ ~ h 2s ~~
1712 Join I,abalestra ~~9~ ~4 ~ ~~ .
1715 Son Nguc Nguyen aK
yo ~~ ~~1720 Fran Labalestra z~
aY~ 1725 Howard Gilbertson d,ti;
o~ 1728 Edna Cowles jo~rsE.s ~s ~ ~ ~'~' ~ ~,; _
cK1733. Eugene Boeckermann sue- ~ ~ ~ ~~
1736 Florian Lauer «~ ~°~ s0`~ ~ '
K 1739 George Kilgr iff /~,Es ~ ~ ,o ~ ~
1742 Choong-Sihn Your ~s- ~d° ~-~
i~ t
1745 Frank Irving ~~ ~``''~ ~° ~
1748 Janet O~elho ~- a ~ ~~ ~ s~
1751 Geroge Colander ^~-u S°`~ ~°5a - "o~°
1754 Delores Gooseens ~~ ~~ '~"~"`~"
d`"`~~"``
1755 Lillian Hogberg ~~- ~~ i~~ ~~. G
y~.1760 ~ Jim Colten ~ ~ ~ ~~
1765 Richara Elm i.~~ ~ 4e'~
a r 1768 E. J. 1Cemmer ~ a~~~ /~~:: yam'aK-1775-- Ner~cy Misr~/Brian enqufst
1776 Robert Beck sG - ~s ~~ ~°' a soO
1779 Hang $hlrrmeister L S cQia ~ `tD~ ~ "~ ~
1781 E. E. Falck ~--v .~~ ~eca~ s= ~ .~-~ ~ z
o r 1786 Richard Stowman /ev s jr' ~
1791 Robert Setsvold
1794 Harold Nilsen l.~k ~ ~"°'
1795 Fedir Chrun ~0s~ ,~~
uC 1804 Meredith Stockford ~`~'~' ~~`~ _ ;3
r~ 1805 Irene Struck /~ ~
b ~ ~ ~~1808 Joseph Janesek S ~ ~.
o K 1811 Andrew p~stergaard ~~~ ~'O
1815 Richard Johnson so 7~ ~Lea~ s+~
6X 1816 G. H. Behrens ~
SYo ~~'~~1823 Edward Thomas
1824 Donald Ledin ~ ~ o `~ ®~ ~ t~' ..~ ~~' `' ~ `~
l~~s ~l ~w~cutt ~ tik- ~ ~Jc .rc: u:o~ 7 ~ -
d~' 1830 ~-~ Alfred Nelson Jr.
soy` ~~~ ~~ ~,L ~;.,~ w~1831 Charles McCarthy
1837 Warren Fall ~s 6?° 50~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ';~~ ,u~ `^
a~"'r c^"~ ~`''s
1838 Alfred Nelson Sr. s
1842 Iiev. JoYn Shuey ~s go Y 07a di~~ ~~ ~
1844 1~aymond Brown '`•~ -3°~ ~'"``""'~` ~" `,.~,~ ~ <~9J
o ~- 3.849 Myles Aikin /.~ s ~
aK1853 Geraldine Anderson ~~s ~
1854 Luther Johnson iQi~ ; ~--~~
1857 Eric Larson ~o. /~s ~`'~ ~ s~ ~ Q
1860 8tewnrt Haight s s" ~~a ~ .~
J (~
o1L1870 Thomas Staffa /°'~~ f~~ ,~,~~ ~,~
1871 Mark Ascerno yam" `~'""~ ~
1875 Erli,rg Hallanger lrrf ~ / ~~
6K 1879 Leonard Harkness ~4~ g~
1880 Glen Willesas, Paul Sch ~ r ietrty- ~~ Sow
off` 1885 Mark Suppes lyYs
u a 189 0 C. F. Cempbel 1 lu • ~ 5 ~~`'" ~ ~--,
1891 Helen Skogsburg I'~~y ~ ~~- ~~~-~--4
1892 James Riels~eier ~-~ ~ O,f
190 $1'uoe ATK3erS0[1 1.51e ~~ `{
6~ 1903 Gary !!a].aer !Ero ~4 ~+ ~~
a~ 3905 Tam Bove Ir~~~ ~d'
o i~'i9t16 J. M. Muen ~ r- ~7 1~n ~ ~ . .
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEE1
MARCH 12, 1986
PAGE 3
PAUL BAEHR, 1746 HQLTON,IN~IYEYAY VARIANCE REQUEST DISGUSSION
Council discussed possib ways in which to solve the driveway placement
problem, and recomaernded tine five foot set back be maintained to the east
border of the house, but aAlow the driveway to go up to within one foot of
the lot line in the apron area for garage access. Barnes was directed to
draw to scale, the proposed driveway placement plan together with a Dover
letter to Mr. Baehr, both ~cuments to be reviewed by Council at the March
26, 1986 meeting. Couaeii concurred that the utility pole was placed in an
appropriate location.
R$QII88T , PR~l. $8 179# T'~Z'tt!!, RII~' 1~R HOOI.8ITARD
R1O~~ION , POI.LQ =Jl'~, STREET IMP`R0~9>~IT ' (#51 .97 )
Council discussed the fa+et that Mr. Nilsen personally restored the
boulevard in front of his home following street construction as he has
high standards with a desire to have the new portion match his prior
investment, and whether or rot the City would be setting a precedent by
reimbursing him as he has requested. Barnes stated that the Engineer
feels the City would save X269.00 on the contract after which Ciernia
moved., seconded by Chenoe~.h, that Mr. Nilsen be reimbursed up to the
City~s cost of #269.00, ~viding the engineer assures this is money saved
on the contract, and Bars inform Mr. Nilsen, by mail, of Councils
reasoning. Upon a vote bring taken the following voted in favor thereof:
Baldwin, Ciernia, Chenoweth and Wallin, and th$ following voted against
the same: Hard. I~btion carried.
DISCOSSION OF BRIGGS A MOHGAN STATEMENT - DEFERRED FROM 2/26/86
Council discussed a letter dated March 4, 1886 from John Van de North
explaining the bond attorgey's statement for services relating to the
Office Park tax increment bonds and development agreement. Cadnments were
made regarding the offer to deduct the X150.00 for messenger deliveries,
the fact that the Pees are being paid by bond proceeds or the developer
does not justify the charge, and more detailed billing will be required in
the future. Also discussed was the number of deliveries by messenger,
some of which were not deemed necessary, and in some cases duplicate
documents, charges for research hours on subjects the attorneys office
had approved previously, anti delays due to other commitments. Council
directed staff to keep a record of these types of problems for the review
in June. Hard moved, seconded by Chenoweth, payment of the Briggs and
Morgan statement. Motion carried unanimously.
POLICY ON HALL RENTAL RELlITING TO SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS TO BE DISCIISSED
FURTHER AT A FUTURE MEETING
Ciernia felt there should be some set policy oa which organizations should
not be charged For use of City Hall, citing League of iiomen Voters as one
organization which cannot use the facility due to hall rental fees.
Barnes was directed to develop a specific list of groups that will not be
charged as well as guidelines for these groups, such as a possible deposit
for use of the kitchen, etc. The list and guidelines will be reviewed at a
future meeting.
NO DECISION MADE ON LIQUOR IN THE PARKS - REFERRED TO ATTORNEY
Ciernia explained that Park and Recreation Commission is unanimously
opposed to~use of alcohol in the parks and would like the parks pasted "No
Consent
Policy CITY OF FALCON HEIGATS
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Agenda Item: F-6
Meeting Date:7/26/89
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
United Way Campaign Incentive
SUBMITTED BY: Jan Wiessner and Shirley Chenoweth
REVIEWED BY:
EXPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary):
All the cities in the St .. Paul Area United Way are participating
in the Pacesetter Campaign. This means we have a goal of a
15~ increase in contributions and the campaign takes place in
August rather than September. Also, Falcon Heights is involved
in a competition with the Cities of Roseville, Shoreview, Arden
Hills, New Brighton and MoundsView to increase our participation.
In order to provide Falcon Heights employees with an additional
incentive to increase their giving, we'd like to give all reg-
ular employees who increase their pledges by 15~ an opportunity
to be-included in a drawing for an extra paid day of vacation.
All full-time and regular part-time would be eligible to
participate).
ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize one paid vacation day for a United
Way Campaign incentive.
FALCON HEIGHTS
2077 W. LARPENTEUR AVENUE FALCON HEIGHTS, MN 65113-6594 PHONE 612-644-5054
June 13, 1989
T0: Samantha Orduno, New Brighton
Ron Moorse, Roseville
Kathy Iago, Arden Hills
3~1ary Sarzion, Moundsview
Tom Simonson, Shoreview
Shirley Chenoweth, Falcon Heights
FROM: Jan Wiessner, Group Leade
Northwest Area Cities Gr up
1989 United Way Campaign
Congratulations on your recent appointment as pour City's 1989 United Way
Campaign Coordinator. That is truly an indication of your professional
reputation as the person best able to motivate others, plan and follow through
on projects in your city: -
This year, to add a little "pizazz" to the campaign, the Northwest Area Cities
will be competing with each other and a winner will be selected based on the
following criteria:
1. Participation Percentage (# of contributors/full time employees)
2. $ Contribution increase over last year's campaign (Percentage
increase)
3. Average $ raised per capita (full-time employees)
The winning city will be the first to receive a traveling award which can be
displayed in ite City Hall until next year's campaign. Following the Pace-Setter
Campaign which will be held this summer, the suburban cities will be issuing a
challenge to the City of St. Paul during the regular campaign. The details of
this challenge have yet to be determined.
Don't forget to attend the meeting on June 29, 8-20 A.M. at the International
institute for all Pacesetter Campaign Coordinators. Following the regular meeting,
Tom Hedges of Eagan will have a brief meeting with the suburban city coordinators.
l10ME OF TMf MINNE90TA STATE FAIR AND THE U OF M INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTI/RE
Page 2
If you have any questions or suggestions, don't hesitate to call any of the
following:
Jan Wiessner, 644-5050, NW Area City Challenge'.
Jim Bower, 298-5790, Pacesetter Campaign Chair'
Tom Hedges, 454-8100, Suburban City Chair
Biz O'Mara, 291-8306, Dnited Way Staff
Thanks for your help and Good Luck:
JW:p
enclosure: City Giving Trend Chart
CC: Dave Childs
Steve North
Gary Berger
Don Pauley
Dwight Johnson
Jim Bower
Tom fledges
Biz O'Mara