Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCAgenda_89Nov8r REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS AGENDA. NOVEMBER 8, 1.989 A. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M. B. ROLL CALL: WALLIN CIERNIA BALDWIN CHENOWETH BUSH WIESSNER S. CHENOWETH ATTORNEY ENGLNEER C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 25, 1989 D. PUBLIC HEARINGS: NONE E. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Disbursements a. Disbursements through 11/8/89 - $62,205.48b. Payroll 10/16/89-10/31/89 - $10,399.442. Cancellation of Check ~~22856 3. Discussion on an Amendment to Chapter 5-14.04 of theCityCodetoChargeaRecordingFeeforConditional UsePermits 4. Request for a Permitted Accessory Use Permit for UtilityShedatFalconHeightsElementarySchool 5. Request for a Permitted Accessory Use Permit for a Utility Shed at 1808 Asbury6. Request for a Permitted Accessory Use Permit for a Storage Shed at 1892 Holton 7. Licenses Crown Healthcare Services 4380, Brigley Roofing, Inc., 4379,Peterson Bros. Roofing of St. Paul, Inc. 44382, GlobeConstruction4383, Central Air Conditioning and Heating Co.44381, University of Minnesota Forestry Club 4384. ACTION: F. REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1• Preliminary Development Agreement - Professional Ventures,Incorporated (PVI) ACTION: 1 - Page 2 November 8, 1989 Agenda F. REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 2. Lions Club Christmas Tree Sale at Park ACTION: 3. Report on the University Grove Neighborhood Commons and Lots 7 & 14, which act as a Commons ACTION: 4. Report on the City Easement on the Extension of Folwell Avenue in Auditor's Subdivision Number 90 in the University Grove Neighborhood ACTION: 5. Proposed Amendments to the Nuisance Code, 8-1.01, Subd.(k) and the Zoning Code, 9-4.01, Subd. 3(k) and 9-2.04, Subd. 1(k) to Allow Composting Areas and Structures ACTION: 6. Adopt Assessment Policy ACTION: 7. Council Retreat ACTION: G. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND UPDATES H. ADJOURNMENT ACTION: COUNCIL WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING MEETING MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1989 r Baldwin called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. ALL MEMBERS PRESENT Baldwin, Bush, P. Chenoweth, Ciernia and Wallin. Also present were Gedde, Wiessner and S. Chenoweth. MINUTES OF OCTOBER 11, 1989 APPROVED The Minutes of October 11, 1989 were approved by unanimous consent. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Council unanimously approved the following Consent Agenda: 1.Disbursements a. Disbursements through 10/25/89, $96,819.11 b. Payroll 10/1/89 - 10/15/89, $10,243.98 2.Cancellation of Check #17856 in the amount of $293.16, issued to Nicholas Bauman on October 13, 13, 1989 Check accidentally destroyed) 3.Resolution R-89-23 Prohibiting Parking on Hamline Avenue from Larpenteur to Roselawn 4.Solid Waste Commission Minutes of October 5, 1989 5.Accepting Audit Proposal from George M. Hansen Company for the 1989 Audit 6.Licenses: Quimby Company, #376 and Rollins Heating and Air Conditioning,,.#378 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH CITY OF ROSEVILLE FOR POLICE SERVICE Baldwin explained that proposals from Roseville and the Ramsey County Sheriff's Department had been considered, and Council felt the City could best be served by Roseville. He stressed that it was a very difficult decision as the Sheriff's Department had provided excellent service for twenty-two years. Wiessner explained that several drafts of the proposed contract had been discussed and several negotiating sessions held. During the discussion Wallin suggested the following minor changes in the proposed contract: provide an example of the population/cost calculation (Page 6, second paragraph), add the words "and service" to paragraph 1 on Page 7, and add "binding" to the word "arbitration" in Item 3 on Page 11. Bush felt it would be nice if the squad car could be marked in some way to indicate Roseville/Falcon Heights to keep the City's identity. Chief Zelinsky of Roseville stated that they are planning to check into the matter and come up with something satisfactory. Following the discussion, Ciernia moved approval of the contract with amendments as suggested at this meeting. Motion carried unanimously. P. Chenoweth expressed concern over the transition from the Sheriff's Department to Roseville. Staff was directed to make arrangements to facilitate the change over. MINUTES OCTOBER 25, 1989 PAGE 2 COUNCIL/SOLID WASTE COMMISSION WORKSHOP SCHEDULED FOR 11/15/89, 7 :00 P.M. Council scheduled a workshop with the Solid Waste Commission for November 15, 1989 at 7:00 P.M. COMMUNITY PARK UPDATE Baldwin reviewed the meeting of the University Physical Planning and Operations Committee which he and Wiessner attended. At that meeting he stressed the importance of cooperation between the University and the City pointing out that the park facility is of benefit to many persons connected with the University. The Committee agreed to add the option of leasing to the U of M staff's recommendation to negotiate the sale of the park land. Council concurred that it is important to show the University that it profits from the use of the park and to encourage them to continue with the present working partnership ie., the University providing the land and the City providing the capital. Baldwin, Bush and Wiessner will attend a meeting with G. M. Donhowe, Vice President of Finance at the University, on November 2nd. REP. MARY JO MCGUIRE'S PRESENTATION RESCHEDULED FOR 11/29/89 Representative McGuire's appearance was rescheduled for November 29, 1989 at her request. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:20 P.M. Tom Baldwin, Mayor ATTEST: Shirley Chenoweth, City Clerk Consent x Policy r~ L~ ItEQUES? TOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION CITY OF TALCON SEICflTS Agenda Item: E-1 Mseting Date: 11/8/89 ITEM DESCRIPTION: DISBURSEMENTS SUBMITTID BY: Tom Relly REVIEf~D BY: II~LANATION/SiJMlSARY (attach additional sheets as necassary) a) Disbursements through 11/8/89,_:.. $62,205.48 b) Payroll 10/16/89 - 10/31/89, $10,399.44 ACTZOr REQITESTED: Approval. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN nOl0 ~O ~ ~p \O \O ~O ~O ~ l0 l0 ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O lfl ~O ~O ~ ~O ~p ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~ ~O ~p xWWWNNNNNNNNNNF-' F-~ H F-+ N N F-' F-' ~...+ F'' 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O ~N I-' O ~O 00 V O~ lJt ~ W N F-~ O ~ 00 V O~ In .L~ W N F-' O \O 00 v O~ Cn .~ W N I-•~ O n x z 0 rorrbd Ca ~'~HHHH7•~G]',D°~W ddC]C7b7 iG bdtd9~zOC]roy;vwmwwOwnGGm ~C o rn K o HcmoGwGG~~ rt o G o G y wCN cn K N W rC ~" a m H K ~w ~C ~~ G~ o rt rt rt N. ~ K rr cn r rtN•x m H n o~c rt p w~c N•p o 0 0 ~ promo'r• ro x m N• w coN• o w ~ ~ :~ ~ ~ x O m to w~ p E (D r~N n K a u, ~ ~N• p ri p ~ c., co ro w G H ~C H c~ G K w ~dKwwmwowartaw. p rr ~O Coc rt ~'rt w t~nb~roysr roc G G rt ~wK nNxQN• m w w w o rt a o o K cn ywwoboroctir• a' ~, rt 7y H K K N. rn rtoq ~ ~ r o n yco xrorr•K~~nwwm~~ma~H,r~~~bbr•ax~,G x' K G~ C a o w w N N K G p rn G~ v~ n w G cn rt p °a m N• x• fD N G~ ~ r'i D O rt rt r• ~ ~ w o o K m ~ rt ~ o7~ G ~ G G~ 04 w ~ G o m G r* G ~ K~ G m w o.G ~ rt G rt rt (D p K v, w p.. w oc rt rh ~Q' ro K ~ n 9 w w mfDG] H F'• (D r• hi fr m rt ~ G O W m n ~n m K n o ~ m° b y tz ~ ~CG K ~ o w o ro w w C watnnF''• ~ fD n rt F-+ H p (D rtrortCnwnwb ~ x p N. rr rt O Gco v, O m a n m ~' ~• ° o ~' ~ o rt w G rt ~ K rt z ro z z~~ o ~+ ro n~ ~n ro y ~n ;ro y~~ r w ro y ro ro r H y ro~o w o~u boyyco ~ co ~ w w o~~~ co K w' w K w ~ rt H ui N.K~~ ro ~ rt rt d rt~ ~w v o ~d rw~ g b r r r, o N. o~ w ~~ w ro ~i~ i w rt ~ o w w ~c m a p m aw~ ~~~ rh G G rt N G co artKK~ o a' K N w o G ~n K w rt w ~o m NwrtoG~~ oo co ~n pmnmmKOcor* z oc K w rt K p K H K rt N. ~p m ~w O O w ocwrtbK~~ N cD G w g R'+ G1. p [n fD z w w w rt K K m E :a ov rt w n ~ ~, K m ~~ ~ ~' rt~ C o w w m r-r,a~ a m o m n~ m m ~ w cn N fD G m K rtrnmKr-i, rn i--~ rt H ~+, n cn ~' rt ~' p rn K b C G by ~ G m A' K m w ~' ~G - G ~o G m o G N b w n o C G w w w Krtw K cD mrtatopw ~, rt G w O G p' G co p G w O w~ NmapGrta~ K m rt i-~ a n rt m l~ i-. G x ~K C1 K I--' N• W p (D n rt cr O (D to O OQ Ocoomwo ~ a K ~ m K w .b b rt ny rnN• G w C G oo m ~ w m ro i~orn ~ O w :~ b N. rn m G r•S G ~c o rn r• ~ p vKi m K G n ry n ~ m o m K n a ~' m '~ ° Kc m ~ C ~. ~' ~' 'b ~b m•w ~rt rt ~ ~ a td K O N p, N ~ 00 ri w a` n v ~. N ~ N 00 ,PV y W N ~ ~ rn H F-+ Cn -P In V ~ I--' ~ V N -cnL~ 00 O 00 F-~ Oo ~ O V In W H+ V V I-' ~O .L~ In O N ~p I-' O~ I V V V O I 0n n N N Vt In ~,,~0 O W 00 O 00 O~ ~p ~ O N C O N N ~p pp O ~--~ tp V W~ O O X 0 0 V N O to O O In O O V O~ O N 0 0 0 O~ O O~ 0 0 0~ In O pp V O AOO 9OVOOOOO~OOOOONOOOOOOOOI-~000~ Wp~,~OV OIJ 000 O z H G~ rJ z 7 z a r d H bd O C!] L17 tl7 z H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N www wwww W N HO~OODV p~ln.~W roz~~7cnto~nro zzz~ t~ w o G o h o w ~c cn r• cn~~v w r•cn ~ aro~ D U1 . H (D n rt fD U~ (D p m n a ~' C o n C ~ n ~ r• ~c 0 0~ o o H td n cn ~ ro rn r+, H n o O rt 'd ri rr, (D O ~ f~ W A '~ p rfi rt LC w rr o o rt r• rt ~ rt n r~ w n a f'1 G °C to O r• !A v n o D p rt H H ~' d O~ TJ F ,' ,' '~ .~ z x ro o ~ DC G N A~ rt 0 A~ A~ n W to m o ~C m rt r• ~ C ~ H rt p G ~ oo ~ ro p ~ ~ ~ rt ri (D fD rt rt A r• O (D w N ~ m G C/] p p m ~-S CY p ¢~ p'' N N ~ n ~ r• w n o ro m r• fD (D F~ p rt n to rt (~ p Hf) o r•r•m rt m D ri t-h QQ ri G r-n p rt r• n c~~ wn~w r• ao ~ r• ~ ~ rt n ~ b ~ C co .• m cD m rt x~ ~ n w m r• m H H ~ rt O O H rt w rt y rt Y rr w i~ r'o r• b ~ Qo cn p' rt n w m r• o rt a co n n to N N N w N N 00 O F--' 1--' H \O N I~ O 00 l~ ~ N F-' N ~ ll7 00 N Q1 In 00 W v H O H V In H In H 00 00 V lIi O ~O .~ O N 00 00 OO ~O O~ 6~ 00 \O O O O~ O ~O In n x n x z 0 H t~ d H 0 7y O z O z 3G~Dct 1981 paid Register Scn 12x37 PM City of Falcon Heights Pane i k ber Employee Number Employee Name Pay period pay Group Number Pay roue D.escriptian Check r~maunt Check Date Status 617887 G G.GG 31-Oct-89 VOIU 617888 G G.GG 3i-Dct-89 dOID 617889 GGGGGGGG2 Wiesner, Janet R.2t1 G1 serni-rnanthly 1,165,64 31-Oct-89 Outstanding017896E~GGGGGG4 Kriegier, Carol J.20 G1 semi-manthly 375.31 31-Dct-89 uutstandinct 617891 GGGGGGGII Chenoweth, Shirley 8.2G G1 semi-manthly 739.21 31-Dct-89 Dutstandina 617892 GGCKlE}4G2G lversan, Terry D.2G G1 serni-monthly 812.71 31-Oct-89 Dutstandina 617893 GGt7GGGG27 Morgan, Jay ?~.2G G1 serni-manthly 763.33 31-Dct-89 Dutstandina 617894 tr4C~CK1G35 timmerman, Katherine 2G G1 semi-manthly 511,98 31-Dct-89 Outstanding 617895 GGUGG4Us8 Wright, Vincent U.2G ul semi-monthly 799.48 31-Dct-89 Outstanding 617896 GGCKiCKiG41 Neumann, Kristine L.2G G1 serni-monthly 43.12 31-Det-89 Outstanding 617897 GGGGGGG63 Phillips, Patricia R.2G G1 semi-rnanthly 637.17 31-Oct-89 Outstanding617898GGGGGGG65Keiiy, Thomas R.2G G1 semi-manthly 862.69 3i-Dct-89 Outstanding617899GGGGGOG66baoenhalrn, Sarin W.2G G1 semi-monthly 135.31 31-Dct-89 Dutstandina 617966 CrGCbGUC~B Supaes, Jean 20 Gi semi-manthly 58.48 31-Dct-89 Outstanding G#7961 GGGGGGG72 Carlson, Carol 20 U1 semi-monthi,y 397. G3 31-Oct-89 Dutstar,ding 617X12 GGGGC~G75 PICKFi, GEDRtiE 2G G1 semi-manthly 32.56 31-Dct-89 Outstanding 617963 666666677 Pose, Gmy E 2G G1 serna-monthly 13.49 31-Oct-89 Outstandir:g 017964 KiCrfiGGG79 Hoyt Taff Susan L.2G U1 semi-monthly 344.92 31-Cict-89 Dutstandina u179G5 GDGDGGGBG Treeful, Linda 20 61 serni-manthly 2c4.87 31-Oct-89 Outstanding 617966 GGCrGGGGGi Baldwin, Tharnas W.iu 03 monthly 2 346.84 31-Oct-89 Dutstandina 617967 DGGGGGGG3 Baumann, Nicholas B.16 G3 manthly 2 5G. 71 31-Dct-89 Dutstandina 617968 GGGGC>tiGG5 Berndt, Ross iG G3 manthly 2 41.5E 31-Det-89 Dutstandina G9 GGGDDGGG7 Bianchi, Joseph D.1G G3 manthly 2 68.66 31-Dct-89 Dutstandina 916 CKrUUGGGGB Bro~vn, Raymond F.1G 63 manthly 2 63.66 31-Dct-89 Dutstandint; 017911 GGOGGGGG9 Bush, Patti J.iG G3 monthly 2 295.65 31-Oct-89 utstanding017912UGCrGGGG1GChenaweth, Philip E.1G G3 marcthiy 2 293. G0 31-Dct-89 Outstarrdir,g617913GUDOGGGI2Ciernia, Paul C.1G 63 manthly 2 250. DG 31-Dct-89 Outstanding 617914 OOGDGGGIB Halmgren, John M. Sr.1G G3 manthly 2 135.66 31-Det-89 Dutstandina 017515 666666622 Lehtay, Dermis G.1G 03 manthly 2 56.66 31-Dct-89 Outstanding 617916 GGOGGGG24 Lindig, Leo 1G G3 monthly 2 363.34 s'1-Dct-89 Outstanding 617917 ODDGGGG33 Scnauffert, Craig F.16 G3 manthly 2 I35.GG 31-Oct-89 Outstanding617918GGCKJGGG34Smida, Gaii iG G3 rncmthiy 2 6x'.66 31-Dct-89 Dutstandina 617919 666666637 Wallin, Gerald E,16 U3 manthly 2 266.60 31-Dct-89 Outstanding 617926 666666639 Morgan, Jay 1C7 G3 manthly 2 41.56 31-Oct-89 Outstanding Srand Fatal 1G, 399.44 Consent x Policy CITY OF TALCON BEIGflTS tEQUEST TOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Item: E-2 Meeting Date: 11 8 89 ITEM DESCRIPTION: CANCELLATION OF CHECK #22856 SUBMITTED BY: Tom Kelly REVIEf+~ED BY: PLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary): The amount was incorrect on check #22856 issued 10/26/89 to Business Records Corporation in the amount of $869.87. ACTIOr REQUESTED: Cancel Check #22856 Consee~t X 3 Polio y CITY OF PALCON HEIGHTS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION r L_ Agenda Item: E-3 fleeting Date: 11/8/89 ITEM DESCRIPTION: DISCUSSION ON AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 5-14.04 OF THE CITY CODE TO CHARGE A RECORDING FEE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS SUBMITTED BY: S t a f f Susan Hoyt Taff, City PlannerREVIEWEDBY : J a n W i e s s n e r ~ . Planning Commission f~LANATION/SUifiI~iRY .(attach additional sheets as necessary): Under the State of Minnesota Administrative Procedures Act, the City is responsible for recording conditional uses and subdivisions with the Ramsey County Recorder. Currently, the City relies on the property owners to record these land use designations. With the exception of Subdivision recordings, which are infrequent and handled as part'of a lengthy approval process, I recommend that the City directly record Conditional Use Permits with the'County (1) to assure the State that the City is fulfilling its statutory obligations; (2) to minimize the delay between granting and recording these documents; and (3) to avoid spending administrative time checking o~n whether or not they are recorded. I also recommend a 30.00 recording charge to property owners for each parcel of land affected by the ,change. (A non-recorded Conditional Use Permit is stillvalid.) -. Proposed Amendment to 15-14.04: 5-14.04 Zoning Application and Recording Fees 50.00 Rezoning 20.00 Variance 20.00 Permitted Accessory Use for Accessory Bldgs. 20.A~0 Conditional Use 30..00 Conditional Use Recording/Parcel of Land 25.00 Subdivi ing 50.00 Platting The Planning Commission reviewed this at its~ll/6/89 meeting. ACTION REQUESTED Apgroval const ;t• lY~ CITY OF FALCON HEIGATS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda I~em:E-4 Beefing Date: 11 /8 /89 ITEDB DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR A PERMITTED ACCESSORY USE PERMIT FOR A UTILITY SHED AT FALCON HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IN A P-1/R-1 ZONE SUBMITTED BY• Roseville Area Schools REVIEWED BY: . Susan Hoyt Taff, City Planner Jan Wiessner, City Administrator Planning Commission II~LANATION/SU!~LSARY (attach additional sheets as necessary) The proposed utility shed is located on the west side of the school building (see Attachment A). The construction material is wood with a white corrugated steel roof. The structure is seven (7) feet high, eight (8) feet long and eight (8) feet wide. The Commission may wish to ask about the visibility~of the roofing material. The shed will be used to hold cans for recycling for school fund-raising projects. The Planning Commission reviewed this at its 11/6/89 meeting. ACTION REQUESTED: Approval d.. , j ATTACf•Il`1EN'I' A Iw n2N,K~~ 1} a~. c_ m i r c t~h~hi ~~~t~ _ _ -~ - -.. - -- - _ c ;3 r ~ ATTACHMF,N'P B i;~'C ~vrv r-iF~G~-iS FLr~Fn•'Ai2; S~/~~'o~ i 7~ 1 rte cR ! I i I l~ yN CC' 0 S r` F~ 2 ~ y ~vtis rQ~~~~o~.v 6 ~'- L w Ox C ~ F r ~r ~`~' ~ G S~FF~ ,~oc'F u~~'c'D S fo/vfp a~N r onse ~t X r~ CITY OF PALCON HEIGATS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda I~em: E-5 keting Date: 11 /8 /8 ITE*i DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR A PERMITTED ACCESSORY USE PERMIT FOR A UTILITY SHED AT 1808 ASBURY IN AN R-1 ZONE SUBMITTED BY: Mr . William Brown, Property Owner REVIEHED BY• ~ Susan Hoyt Taff, City Planner Jan Wiessner, City Administrator Planning Commission fl~LANATION/STMKARY (attach additional sheets as necessary): Mr. Brown proposed to build a utility shed in the northeast corner of his rear yard (see Site Plan - Attachment A). The shed's size and location conform to the City Zoning Code (see Attachment B). The shed will be made of wood and constructed on concrete. Mr. Brown proposed to paint it white with a red roof and red trim to match the house. The Code, 9-2.04, Subd. 1(i)(5) recommends an exterior color scheme to match the principal structure or an earth tone. The Planning Commission reviewed this at its 11/6/89 meeting. ACTION REQTIESTED: Approval 1 DY_ ~_~4~4'ri _DATE~?/~a /~y sue~ecT----{~ ~~~-- f CMS ). CY------DATE-------- -----------------------~-ATTACFiMII~*T A co. T o~?GEL J _, ~ /~ J~) ~ ~r T 33 26700 120 03 2 623U NII~IAM H BRONN ET AL 1806 ASBURY ST PAUL MIN L Y i V L..vC° A T 1 ~ -'Y fs,re E= v c J f i C v 1•-- f f e;Y 4 i i Y~1 i . i l ~ --~rr e_ s ~ IY1 i /Y d'i J i~ 7 c ACHMENI' B awl f`'ds'.~?h '~ LJe Y i~- .it1 C k, . v f t.I/ 1 v.Mr"~~ . f. I l i~ 11 yi.+;~f, I ~ ' ~ y,l~ ~ ! I , ~ I , , ~s' r•i v ~~ ~. i ~ t ~ E C ~ - I .. i 1 f s.' _ IConae .t X Poli~CITY OF PALCOTr' HEIGHTS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda I,em: E-6 Beefing Datt: 11/6/89 ITE*t DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR A PERMITTED ACCESSORY USE PERMIT FOR A STORAGE SHED AT 1892 HOLTON IN AN R-1 ZONE SUBMITTID BY• Mr. Gary Affoleter, Property Owner REVIEi~ED BY• Susan Hoyt Taff, City Planner Jan Wiessner, City Administrator Planning Commission PLANATION/SjM*SARY (attach additional sheets as necessary).: Mr. Affoleter is currently constructing a storage area attached to his. garage for his boat. It qualifies as a storage shed because it is a separate use from his garage. As of this writing, he has not yet submitted his site plan to the City due to short notice. However, he described the shed's dimensions and the site has been reviewed by the Planner. The shed is 24 feet long, 10 feet wide and 8 feet high. He planned to temporarily cover it with tarpaper and plastic. This would not meet our Code. r The Planning Commission reviewed this request at its 11/6/89 meeting. A ACTION REQUESTED : 29 ~ ~ (fit ~AQ~~ No-t '~ sC,r~~E Approval Consent x Policy 7 CITY OF lALCON HEICSTS ItEQUES? !OR COUNCIL CONSIDERA?ION Agenda Item: E - ~ Meeting Date: 11/8/89 ITEM DESCRIPTION: LICENSES SUBMITTID BY: Ratherine J. Zimmerman RgpIEWED BY: Shirley Chenoweth PLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary): CORPORATE Crown Healthcare Services #380 NEW 1550 West Larpenteur Avenue (Approved by Fire Marshal) Falcon Heights, MN 55113 GENERAL CONTRACTOR Brigley Roofing, Inc. #379 NEW 2089 Lamplight Circle Woodbury,"MN 55125 Peterson Bros. Roofing of St. Paul, Inc.382 NEW 481 Burgess Street St. Paul, MN 55117 Globe Construction #383 NE W 4640 North Chatsworth Shoreview, MN 55126 MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR Central Air Conditioning and Heating Co.381 NEW 2020 Silver Bell Road Eagan, MN 55122 University of Minnesota Forestry Club 384 to sell Christmas trees) ACTION REQUESTED Approval ADDENDUM REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 8, 1989 Consent Agenda E-8 Planning Commission Minutes of November 6, 1989. E-7 Additional License - Conklin Tree Farms and Gardens X386 P.O. Box 167 (sell Christmas trees at Wheeler, Wisconsin 54772 Hermes Floral) DELETE ITEM F-1 Paul Ganst from PVI called to request that this item be placed on hold. He said they are working on some ingress-egress concerns. MINUTES REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 6, 1989 Vice Chair Finegan called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. PRESENT Barry, Boche, Duncan, Finegan, Grittner and Nestingen. Also present was Council Liaison Wallin and City Planner Susan Hoyt Taff. ABSENT Black, Carroll (written comments submitted), Daykin. OCTOBER 2, 1989 MINUTES APPROVED Duncan moved, seconded by Barry, approval of the October 2, 1989 Minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USE PERMIT REQUEST FROM WILLIAM BROWN, 1808 ASBURY William Brawn, 1808 Asbury, requested a Permitted Accessory Use Permit to remove a brick/stone fireplace and construct in its place a utility shed located in the rear of his lot. This utility shed will be constructed within setback restrictions, placed in an unobtrusive location in the rear of his lot on a cement slab, have wood paneled exterior and be 8' long by 8' wide by 7' high. After a discussion, Duncan moved, seconded by Nestingen approval of the Permitted Accessory Use Permit. The motion carried unanimously. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USE PERMIT REQUEST BY THE ROSEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT AT FALCON HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Gary Ruud, a Falcon Heights Elementary School parent, presented a plan to build a 8' by 8' utility shed to house aluminum cans that the school collects as a fundraising tool to purchase playground equipment. After a discussion on location, construction materials and the use of corrugated steel for roofing material, Barry moved, seconded by Nestingen that the Permitted Accessory Use Permit Request be approved with the condition that the roof be painted a dark color in the spring of 1990. The motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED COMPOSTING ORDINANCE 9-4.01, SUBDIVISION 3 k AND 9-2.04, SUBDIVISION 1 Finegan opened the Public Hearing at 7:50 P.M. and Affidavit of Publication. 9-4.01, SUBDIVISION presented the Richard Wenkel, 1825 Fairview, asked whether the proposed composting ordinance would affect his placing leaves in a temporary storage area to be plowed into the ground in the spring. Wallin replied that it was not the intent of the City to intrude on the practices of its citizens but provide away to accomplish these kinds of items in a consistent manner. Daykin arrived at 8:00 P.M. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:10 P.M. MINUTES REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 6, 1989 • PAGE 2 Further discussion on the wording changes requested by the Solid Waste Commission and the fact that they are planning to write their own composting brochure followed. After more discussion on yard waste collection, the .Commission moved to another agenda item. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USE PERMIT .FROM GARY AFFOLTER, 1892 HOLTON Mr. Affolter, 1892 Holton, requested a Permitted Accessory Use Permit to construct a shed attached to his garage for storage of his boat during the winter months. He distributed his application for Consideration of Planning Request Form with attachments describing location and type of construction. Discussion ensued whether or not the structure constitutes a shed or a garage addition and, therefore, whether the Permitted Accessory Use Permit was necessary. Planner Hoyt Taff agreed that the structure initially-appears to bean addition to an existing garage. However, she interpreted it as a storage shed because it did not fit the definition of a garage, it has a separate entrance and it is built specifically for storing a boat. Therefore, a Permitted Accessory Use Permit as well as a building permit, due to its size, is required. Barry moved, seconded by Daykin, to approve the Permitted Accessory Use Permit as requested based upon the description contained in his October 31, 1989 Application for Consideration of Planning Request and attachments; that a building permit would be required and should • be taken out forthwith; and work on such structure be completed within a year. A vote was taken. The following voted in favor thereof: Barry, Daykin, Duncan, Finegan, Grittner and Nestingen and the following voted against: Boche. (Boche was of the opinion that a precedent would be set by approving a structure which is attached to the garage as a Permitted Accessory Use.) The motion carried. DEFINITIONS OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN THE ZONING CODE, 9-1.02(1) and 9-2.04, SUBDIVISION 2 b Staff Planner Susan Hoyt Taff reviewed changes which would clarify portions of the Zoning Code which are illogical, confusing and/or contradictory relating to accessory structures. She recommended exempting attached garages in an R-1 Zone from the Code requirement that the accessory use not extend beyond the front of the principal structure (9-2.04, Subdivision 1(f). She described several examples of this construction currently within .the City. She suggested a size limitation such as a four car garage be considered.. Discussion on these points followed. Boche moved the lay the item over but the motion died for the lack of a second. Black arrived at 8:33 P.M. After further discussion on whether the Commission wanted to address this issue at this time or request further staff clarification, • Finegan moved (he relinquished the Chair to Black) seconded by MINUTES REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 7, 1989 PAGE 3 Boche to again lay the item over. After a vote was taken, the following voted in favor thereof: Finegan and Boche, and the following voted against the same: Barry, Black, Daykin, Duncan, and Critter. Motion failed. Then Finegan moved, seconded by Grittner to approve the idea of exempting attached garages in R-1 Zones from the requirement in Section 9-2.04, Subdivision 1(f ). Motion carried unanimously. Grittner was of the opinion that the size of an .attached garage located in the front of the house should be limited to 50 percent of the front footage of the home. Staff was directed to further research the issue and present further data and recommendations to the Commission. A second contradictory definition of accessory structure was clarified. Daykin moved, seconded by Finegan, to delete the words "and this Code" from Section 9-2.04, Subdivision 1(b) of the Zoning Code. The motion carried unanimously. AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 5-14.04 OF THE CITY CODE TO CHARGE A RECORDING FEE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, VARIANCES AND REZONING INITIATED BY PROPERTY OWNERS Planner Susan Hoyt Taff reviewed the .fee schedule in Section 5-14.04 and suggested that charges be added for the recording of variances and conditional use permmits on parcels of land so that the the State is assured that the City is fulfilling its statutory obligations; it would .minimize the delay between granting and recording; and it would avoid spending administrative time checking on whether or not they were recorded. Discussion ensued as to how the City assures such recording is done and what fee is adequate. Boche moved, seconded by Barry, that a minimum $30.00 fee be charged for recording variances and conditional uses plus additional charges for the recording when the fee is greater; and that staff investigate whether the City is charging adequate fees for the rezoning, variance, and conditional use requests. The motion carried unanimously. UNIVERSITY GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMONS AND LOTS 7 AND 14, WHICH ACT AS A COMMONS In response to an inquiry from the University of Minnesota, Boche moved to recommend to the City Council that it not purchase the Neighborhood Commons Area and Lots 7 and 14, which act as a Commons, of University Grove. The motion was seconded by Barry and approved unanimously. CITY EASEMENT ON THE EXTENSION OF FOLWELL AVENUE IN AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 90 IN THE UNIVERSITY GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD Discussion ensued on whether the Basemen extension, whether it would be needed as bicycle/pedestrian trail as proposed in Plan and whether it should be given with t would be needed for street a connection for the proposed the Park and Recreation no charge to the University. r ~ =1., MINUTES REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE 4 • Boche moved, seconded by Barry, that the Planning Commission support the City Council in their negotiations with the University of Minnesota to give up only 25 feet of the easements which would increase the size of the lot to 12,090.60 if in doing so it would be of benefit to the City of Falcon Heights. The motion. carried unanimously.. PROFESSIONAL VENTURES INCORPORATED (PVI) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LARPENTEUR-AND SNELLING AVENUES Planner Susan Hoyt Taff updated the Commissioners on the proposal by Professional Ventures, Inc. for the construction of a 65,000 square foot one-story commercial space for the southeast corner of Larpenteur and Snelling. The item was on the City Council agenda for November 8th but is being withdrawn at the request of the Developers. She will keep the Commissioners updated. APPROPRIATE MANNER OF CONDUCTING HEARINGS ON LAND USE ISSUES Commissioners noted the summary on procedures to be used when conducting hearings on land use issues. Chairman Black declared the meeting adjourned at 9:38 P.M. Submitted by: Katherine J. Zimmerman Approved: Edgar Finegan, Secretary FALCON HEIGHTS 2077 W. LARPENTEUR AVENUE FALCON HEIGHTS, MN 55113.5594 PHONE 612.64<•5050 APPLICATIOIr FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Commission Action/Date Council Action/Date Applicant Name: Address: Owner Name: r- Date of Application l ~ ~3 l l Q $~( Fee Paid r~,p{- s~ rt,I (e`fZ- a2-IS T tntl_ hone 1 ~ ~, 2 ~ ~-)-~a~n ~ul can -~-~t,~q-~b ~1,~,~ ss i ~ 3 Street Ctty Sta e Ztp Code Q.v~,e. l.CSC+.~UJ~Q.~ Last First Intl. Phone Address: Street City State Zip Code Street Location of Property in Question: i• Type of Request:Rezoning Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval Plan royal ~ r~ ~«~~ ~~er ( ec Appli le g Code r?umber: Chapter Section Present Zoning of Property: ~- - 2 Present Use of Property: ~ ~..c„ I,~ ~.i.~t 1.t1 ~w.:l..lJ(,~n(. I hereby declare that all statements made on this request a don the ad itio al material are true. n ~~ r Signatur of Ap nt Date Received by (name, tide) Legal Description of Property: L U r' ~ L .- A r / 5 ~ ~e ~" f ex~! ~r~ 1~~"~ y,~ pd t" ~~x ~ ~I, ct /" C P a'I f ~ ~a ~J( lf_~~h ~ t ~!° ~'' r~ a~I ~F q/ frimfl18Q'/9G/~a P i ~5ft~r x~ rl v/rl v sf s x ~ ~ r T ra art P/ S©i~~l .- i~~ J- r ~ s ~ 5l ~ c_ Grey llrna.,,/- ~c~' ~~~'='jg 7X b~'iiap~c~~i ~° s off"~~/d~sd~ I~~vc l 5~~ s' ~ /,' /7i"Ps a5 -rd~tn~d~~c~ r 1 P ~' ~`"N f~1 f ~ /~f`o ,L- ~"r of J ~~ 1 1 r J'v ~ ~a i G a v/ /~/ /C~ ~fc Y w ~G o n /~c t y ~~5~ /~~> ~ h' ~ 1f ..~ 6/~7b/~ ur ~ _. eP .ter d t~ r' Q' ~'~/ .. -_ __S~r N ~ ~ r~ _ /" / _ _ ._ l __ __v2X ``,,>> _. X ff ~ -~ --- ~- _ .. - --_ G------ -- _ ___ yP-rte a_~C7f~-- ._ __ _- 1 / __ . Q l • g ! r-- r A~' 3' 1 „ G {f _ ~ rte ~, ~ V;_P ~ j~oc~ ~ ~ r a ~ t' S f~ PLAAgIF(3 11~D DEDBLOPl~Nf 9-1.02 18. B~ ldia&_ fay atruoture, either tesporary or persd~e~nt, havingaro" and yyd or built for theshelter or •ncloaure of asaniaal, or property of any kind. Ybea an y person, pletely separated from evs other y portion thereof is ooa- a "`~"'~ 1 ~ de ..L„~,~p~aration, T0, tiarage private. Dor'tion of the prinoipaldbuildingone story aooeaaory building or sed riaaril for the etori of ~ aaseu~~ a ~o~' i-hioh isp ~~ reoreatioaal vehlelea or farmttvoks. ~r vehioles trailers, 129. aeoreation Vehicle. any vehicle or atruoture designed sad Io, i7 v Qua ers x i see ~ :11ofraerolloxingqualifioationa~ a) is sot used as the per~aneotreaidenoeofthe~oxner or~ooeupant; b) is used for tasporary livingquartersbytheoxneroroooupait -tdiile engaged in reorsation orvaoationaotivities; o) is toxed or~self-propelled on public streetsorbighxaysiaoideataltosuchrecreationorvacationaativitiea; d) iaampleaofauoh~~ebiolas isolude van oaapera, tent oaspiag itrailers, self-contained travel trailers, pick-up oaaipers, osaping Iibuses, and self-contained self-propelled truck chassis scantedvehiclesprovidinglivingaceommodatio~ns. Co3nst ,t_ ~ Agenda I.em: F-1A Yoliry x CITY OF PALCON HEIGATS 11 / 8 / 8 9MeetingDate. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERA?ION ITEM DESCRIPTION: PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - PROFESSIONAL VENTURES, INCORPORATED (PVI) SUBMITTED BY: John Grossman, President REVIEWED BY : . Tom G e d d e Jan Wiessner ' II~LANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary): PVI has submitted a Preliminary Development Agreement Application and fee to the City for a project to redevelop the SE corner of Snelling and Larpenteur. If the Council approves this Agreement, the next steps for the project will be simultaneous project review by. a. Planning Commission with community and professional planner input. b. Technical review by the City's financial, engineering and legal consultants. Representatives of PVI will be present to describe project. ATTACHMENTS: A. Preliminary Development Agreement . B. Application for TIF Financing C. Goals and Policies re: TIF Applications ACTION REQUESTED: Consider entering into Preliminary Development Agreement with PVI. ' 1 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS PRELIlyiINARY DEVELOPMEAI'!' l,GREEMENT ATTfIAICHMENT "A" -1 1\~~~k ~' This Preliminary Development Agreement wade this 30 day of October , 1989y between the City of Falcon Heights, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota hereinafter called City"') and Professional Ventures Partnership general a partne.~ship under the laws of Minnesota hereinafter called 'Developer"). WHEREAS, the City .has received from Developer a proposal that the City .assist in financing a project by - providing tax increment financing in coruzect on to a project to be undertaken by the Developer within the City. NOW, THEREFORE; in consideration of the foregoing, the parties hereto agree as follows: I. The Developer shall .submit to the City with this Preliminary Development.Agreement an applicat~_on for tax increment financing, together with an application fee in the amount of $10,000. 2. The .City si`~all consider the application in accordance with its policies and procedures for reviewing tax increment financing applications, as such .policies and procedures currently exist or as revised from time to time by the City. The City shall have no obligation to issue tax increment financing and the City reserves the right to take any action on the application that the City, in its sole discretion, shall deem appropriate. L~ A-~ 3. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for any and all expenses and costs of the City in connection with , the preparation of the development program, the tax increment financing plan, the development agreement and all documentation and procedures required $n connection with the proposed or actual issuance of .tax increment financing. Costs and expenses shall include, but not be limited tb, all out-of-pocket expenses, all fees €or legal services, all fees for engineering and :financial services including feasibility reports, appraisal costs, and all costs of report, and hearings. 4. Three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) of the application .fee is a non-refundable administrative fee. 5. Seven thousand dollars ($7,000..00) of the application fee is an advance to cover reimbursable expenses incurred by the City as described in paragraph 3, and the City may disburse those funds as costs and expenses are incurred by it. ~Cf costs and expenses exceed $7,000.00, the City shall bill the Developer for the additional costs and expenses and Developer shall pay any such statements within UXV thirty days. 6. The City shall, in its sole .discretion, determine the reasonableness and appropriateness of costs .and expenses it incurs. 2- A-3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF., the undersigned have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota By Its DEVELOPER y ~ ~. Its ~~. r-~ 3- 88-9 10/12/88 TG/JW/PP ATTACHMENT"B" -1 i•CITY OF .FALCON HEIGHTS APPLICATION FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Please type or print I. APPLICANT a) Business Name: Professional Ventures Partnership b) Business Address: 5891 Cedar Lake Road Minneapolis, Minnesota 554 T6 c) Telephone 612/542-9999 d) Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, etc.) and date of formation: Partnership e) -State of Incorporation or Organization: Minnesota 6 B-2. f) .Brief description of nature of business, principal. products, etc. Commercial Real Estate Development and Brokerage. g) If project is leased, List prospective lessees, nature of lessee's. business. and principal products, etc. N/A h) Authorized IRepresentative (provide mailing address and telephone number(s): Professional Ventures development Services 5891 Cedar Lake Road Minneapolis, MN 55416 i) If applicant is corporation, state officers, directors, stockholders .holding more than 5$ of the stock of corpora ion (state name, address and relationship to applicant): [If Corporation not formed, set forth as much as .possible concerning potential Officers, Directors, Stockholders N/A j) If applicant is general partnership state general partners and if litaited partnership state general partners and limited partners with sere than 5~ interest in the .limited partnership: (if partnership is not formed set forth as ~euch as possible concernin5 potential partners: John N. Grossman William H. Beard. 7 k) Name, address and telephone number of Applicant's legal counsel and accountant: Legal Accounting David SeLlergren Larkin, Hoffman, Daly Lindgren 1500 Xerxes Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55431 II. PROJECT Marvin Mirsky Devine, Scherzer & Brody 500 American National .Bank Bldg. St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 a) Location.{state street address and attach the legal description of project site): Attached b) Present ownership of project site. If project site is not currently owned by applicant, describe arrangements by_which applicant intends to acquire or use site: Land under opt-ion and control at this time. c) Describe Fraject.~ If Project is a building or addition to building, specify number of stories, square footage, related parking facilities, etc. If Project includes equipment, describe equipment. rttach site plan and build.iag elevations, if available): Single story retail strip center. 285 stalls. r ~ L_J 8 65,000 total square feet. B-3 B-- 4 d) Zoning: 1) What is the zoning status of project site? Retail (P~-Z> 2) Is zoning status appropriate for the intended use.? Yes 3) Wil rezoning, zoning-variance, or conditional use pennit be sought in connection with project? See pity -Administrator) Describe: Conditional use and other attenant variances. 4} Is the property properly subdivided far the intended use? Yes 5) Has site plan approval been obtained for this project? If so, on what date by Planning Corrsnission No ? By Council No ? 6) Attach zoning reap of property within 300 feet of project (see City ~-Administrator): 9 B-5 i• e) Attach a financial proforma (5 year minimum) which shows an estimate of sources and uses of project funds which allows for the analysis of the following: 1) Project cost detail 2) Total debt detail 3) .Ongoing revenue sources 4) Ongoing expenditure items 5) Inflation analysis 6) Vacancy analysis 7) Tax analysis 8) Sale of project analysis 9) Profitability, risk and interest rate of return ratios 10) Time period of public participation 11) Testing of various financial assumptions L 10 - B.- 6 g) Will project De occupie8 DY applicant after. • completion? Zf not, state name of future lessees, and status of commttmenta or Lease agreements: " Retail community strip usage. blames and addresses of .architect,engineer and general con.tractar for project: Architect Engineer Contractor Korsunsky Krank Erickson Westwood Engineering Kraus Anderson 300 1st Avenue North 7101 York Avenue 200 Grand Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55401 Suite 300 St. Paul, MN 55102 Minneapolis, MN 55435 i) Current real estate taxes assessed on project .site, and estimated real estate taxes on project site upon completion of project: j~ idhat is the target date for: 1.Construction Start March, 1990 2.Construction completion 7 - 9 Months k) If the applicant is proposing Planned Unit Development PUD)" status, additional information is required. (See Ch 9,Part 16 of City Zoning Code)Checklist is attached which Will be used to assure completion of application. 11 B-7 III. TAX INC~NT FINANCING a) Demonstrate that alternative sources of financing are not available for the project and that the project could not be constructed as proposed without the assistance requested. Site .currently occupied by blighted building and structures. Preliminary proforma analysis indicates that financing would be unavailable to 'acquire and demolish structures. Even if .financing was available, equity returns would .not allow project to proceed, Development proforma analysis attached. b) Amount of .project expenses requested by applicant to be paid from proceeds of the tag increment financing: c) Proposed date that applicant expects tax increment proceeds to be available to pay project expenses: IV: MISCELLANEOUS a) Detail the status of any previous or current requests Which applicant., its principals or affiliates have made to the City or to other municipalities fer tax increment financing: City of Oakdale, Bergen Plaza b) If tax increment financing has been granted to the applicant by other municipalities, please describe: City of Oakdale, Bergen Plaza 12 - B-8' c) Has applicant ever been in bankruptcy? If yes, describe cizcumstances. No or its officers, shareholders or partners d) Has applicant/,ever been convicted of a felony? If yes, describe conviction and .sentence. No e) Has applicant ever defaulted on any bond or mortgage commitment? No f) Will any public official of the City, either directly or indirectly, benefit by the issuance of the City's tax increment zevenue bonds for this .project within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.311 or 471.87? If so, specify. No Applicant understands and agrees that the information contained in this application and the information containe8 in items above i6 intended for use by the City of Falcon Aeights, its officers, employees, and agents in connection with the City's consideration of possible tax increment financing for applicant's project; however, the City gives no assurance that this information may not be disclosed, is whole or in part, to persons other than City's officials, employees and agents. i3 r The Undersigned, (a) (the) Partner of applicant, hereby represents and warrants to the City that he) {she) has carefully reviewed this application, and .that , the statements and information contained herein and submitted herewith are accurate and complete to the best of the Undersigned's knowledge and belief. Dated: November 2, 1989 Professional Ventures Partnership Applicant By: ZtS : Partner The City reserves the fight to require additional information and supporting data from the applicant after the filing of this Application. B-9 14 B-10 EXHIBIT B The West 506.5 feet except the~West 426.5 feet of the South 150 feet of the North 359.5 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 22, Township 29, Range 23, ~xcE.pt public streets and highways. ALSO Tracts A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J and R, Registered Land Survey No. 94, files of Registrar of Titles, County of Ramsey. Tract A except the North 38.33 feet of the West 70 feet thereof and except the South 51.67 feet of the North 90 feet of the West 73 feet of Bract A, Registered Land Survey No. 2, files of Registrar of Titles, County. of Ramsey. Subject to an easement over the South 20 feet of the North 110 feet of the West 73 feet of Tract A, Registered Land. Survey No. 2. Sai3 easement is to be used for parking. r ores is non-exclusive, but no obstruction shall be Bu P ~ ' placed thereon.deprving the grantee of the use thereof. i Subject t,o an easemenr. over ~ that part of :the East 20 feet of the West 9Q feet of the North 38.33-feet which lies Northwesterly of a line drawn .from the Northeast. corner of said East 20 feet to the Southwest corner of said East 20 feet of the West 90 feet of the North 38.33 feet of said Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 2. Said Easement is non-exclusive, but no obstruction shall be placed thereon depriving the grantee, its successors or assigns, of the use thereof. Subject to easement'"for snow.fenees_n the State of Minnesota in connection with Trunk`%Highway No. 51. (Covers-Tract A,. Registered Land Survey No. 2). I rnc,y ~yE~vUE 4tgPLEKNG' ° ~R. i P-2 ° 0 i o a I i i ~ _ .~ I i tiOCD CT' I y i 0 0 1L-• R-3G a I er _ o a ~ o 0 0 o o o i o i o O~ O i O` O o-- `u l o o o o o l i J o o o o I a l o I o I o\~. i00IQJ r... .._._ ~ ° i D i - o L ° !~u o i b o Iv °_ o I o i o o o ~ o ~ o i ° p:q : :TV~r KfJ~V: Lci t[w...rc LAI~L I i I I .i q d i o~ ! IOi ~ I~I .o i j l ~ ! i Z~nin~~-..OJ ~-~ i~lIII~ I, ~; ~1 is ;` I I ' i O I I O ._. ~-----: r--~ p ~ i1.. O..' i ~ i I ~ o 0o i o ;~-~ o ! p :~ o' ~'v~ o ? ~ 't c j o f r----~J ° i /, j Q ~O ~ OI~ l o j Z~ ~ o ~ o ° o o ~ c o I' °° -~ Z ~-' ~° ° i/} o ~° ~ ~ a I a o i oI 7 cio~opo j l~~ a ! o ':o I . B - l 1 a ° o 1 c o e o~ I O ° I O C o O Co I ° ~ ° I Ci i a . ° ¢ I o o Ie t o j a t a l i o o..~. '~~ r o l e o f o 1 o f ~Q ' L~ :~_ c o II E L~--; j o i a a f O ; O iI9 0 0 ~c o° o r a_~; j o po o j o j o ~, r--i '- ijofo~ .` o c o1 ~~ ~ I o 0 o .. C o to+oo:o;o o cold=l o LARPE~y i EUR AV EVUE j *~7<GI i o O l 0 0 l 0 0 `O o f 0 D i o O i o l c i a L• : a oio a~ o is ou a:o o~ I _ i i ~ 111 of oia:o R= ~._j r1 e a0o.ioolo o:o.o o; ~ ' o:oeoloi d~ o J p D of `Ion o`D O I ~ ~ ~ l~ o : o . co:oloiolololoto o 0 o el ':L-o i ! i o ~ ° ( ° ° o 4 0 io ojo to to joio o G G p `.aI Quo - 0- 0 0 I I i.V I I I ~[ o i~ j j I j~ j j~' o fo to :e: d o ~la olo ?o la to to loi o:e ~o:o~c a O 0 :c I ~ I ~ . I I t ~ - ~~- - _ -_ r i_ falcon H~~g~~s r-- 0 a00' 80G' NOr j ' `.~, iii' __ - _- ~ .-1 -:~':~ i-. ~•. L~~. its. ____ _. I! -i ^iIl) -+ill F- E '~' o+ ry -i~; a~i ~tt~= -ii;.iii U'.~ -- --•--. - -- - - - F - - --- ~ n _ .. n S rF; ~__. ..- .. i Y~ " i' `r~ Grl~a T-~ ~' i 3 - -. 9r ; '-- 1 r~~v~~nr. _.__ ... 1`~. i• c -- i 2~ Ii.~ I\ I1 u u_= i ATTACHMENT "C".-1 CITY OF FALCON HEIG~iTS, ~ES02A GOALS AND :POLICIES OF THE CITE EfP fALC~i HEIGHTS AND .CRITERIA AS TO THE B.EVIEii OF SAE I]ICREMF.NT FINANCING te-PPLICATZAtS GOALS AND POLICIES 1. General Goals a. ?la,intain and iaprove [he community character and identity. b. Prevent and eliminate blight and resist deterioration of the environment. c. Maintain and continue development of a strong economic base and create a favorable climate for the operation of responsible free enterprise systems - d. Provide active and passive open space for the en 'o entJym of Falcon Heights' residents. e. Enable the convenient movement of persons vithln the City in a safe manner. 2. General Policies a. Continue development in accordance with a co=prehen.sive plan .for land use, housing, transportation, aid community facilities. Insofar as it fs.possible and practical, all future development should .reflect the major proposals of the comprehensive plan, mere possible., the plan should be related to plans in eeigbboring communities and to the metropolitan area as a whole. b. Review and amend the comprehensive plan :s necessary to ensure its usefulness as a practical guide to current and future development. .Adhere to the comprehensive plan as closely as possible to ensure consistent development policy. Zoning changes based on the comprehensive plan shall be considered only after appropriate review of a specific development proposal. r 1 LJ 1 _ b. Plan land .uses to reduce congestion trn streets.. c. Channel major traffic volumes onto a relatively few major streets and highways and discouraged from passing through residential areas. d. Require streets be developed according to their function. Pavement width, load capacity, and continuity of the street must recognize the function for Which the street is intended. e. Coordinate all street playing With county, state, and federal road plans. f. Develop and expand the pedestrian system .and bikeway system in the City. CRITERIA The City of Falcon Heighte is granted the paver to issue tax 3nerement financing assistance under Minnesota Statutes: Chapter 273. The Falcon Heights City Council, being aware that such .financing may pre- vent the emergence of blighted land., excessive unemployment and the need for redevelopment financing from the state and federal governments, has expressed its support for the use of such financing but has reserved the right to .approve or reject projects on a case by case basis. The following criteria have, therefore, been developed as a guide for review of applica- tions: 1. The project is to be compatible with the overall development plans-and objectives of .the City and of the neighborhood in which the project is located. 2. New businesses locating in Falcon Heights must show relatively substantial new employment and tan base being generated by the project. 3. Businesses should locate in areas of the City that the City wishes to develop, redevelop, or which in any way complements any development plans or policy of the City, will constitute a prime purpose under .these guidelines.. It is also the City's intent to assist in business e~cpansions or relocations within the City where it can be shown that such would have a substantial, favorable impact on employment and/or tax base, or would help retain existing business in the City. r~ U J j 3. The applicant shall be required to deliver aPreliminaryAgreementsignedbytheApplicantin theformattachedheretoatthetimetheapplicantsubmitstheapplicationtotheCity. ADMINISTRATIVE 1. The City Council reserves the right to deny anyapplicationforfinancingatsaystageoftheproceedingspriortoitsacceptanceoftheI3evelopmentAgreement. 2. The City is to be reimbursed, and he3.d harmless, foranalfromanyout-of-pocket costs related to the actualorproposedtaxincrementfinancing. 3. All applications and supporting materials anddocumentsshallremainthepropertyoftheCity. Notethatallsuchmaterialsmaybesubjecttodisclosureand/or public review under applicable provisions of Statelaw. _ Revised October, 1988 5 - I Coflst 1t I Policy X i CITY OF PALCON HEIGHTS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Item: F-2 1'keting Date: 11/8/89 ITEM DESCRIPTION: LIONS CLUB CHRISTMAS TREE SALE AT PARK SUBMITTED BY: Carol Kriegler REVIEWED BY. Jan Wiessner fl~LANATION/SU~SARY (attach additional sheets as necessary): The Falcon Heights/Lauderdale Lions Club would again like to use the Community Park from Nov. 18 to Dec. 15, 1989 for the purpose of selling Christmas trees and wreaths. The Lions Club is prepared to propose some alternative ideas for displaying and selling the trees and .wreaths in the park, and for providing shelter to its sales people. Sam Jacobs will be available at the Council meeting to discuss their proposal and to answer questions. ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of use of park for Lions Club Christmas tree sales. Conae ~t Yoli~ ~ X CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS BEQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda I~em: F-3 Beefing Date: 11 /8 /89 ITE*i DESCRIPTION: REPORT ON THE UNIVERSITY GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMONS AND LOTS 7 & 14, WHICH ACT AS A COMMONS SUBMITTED BY• University of Minnesota REVIEGfED BY• -Susan Hoyt Taff, City Planner - Jan Wiessner, City Administrator Planning Commission B~LANATION/SU*~MARY (attach additional sheets as necessary): The University of Minnesota is currently proposing to sell the lease rights to the University Grove property! to the homeowners in the neighborhood. In so doing, the homeowners will hold title to the dwellings and property. The neighborhood will no longer be re- stricted to University faculty and staff. As part of this effort, the University of Minnesota-inquired if the City is interested in purchasing the three common areas and lots 7 and 14, which act as a commons. (see Attachment A). You may wish to consider these facts when making your decision: 1. The commons areas serve adjoining property owners as . undivided open space. They do not act as a neighborhood park because there- is no public access. 2. Our park plan does not address these areas as park space. There is a University Grove Park. 3. The expense of maintaining these areas would-come out of the City's budget. 4. At the University Grove Neighborhood Association meeting, University officials indicated the commons areas would be deeded over to adjoining property owners or the Neighborhood The Planning Commission reviewed this at its 11/6/89 meeting. ACTION REQUESTED: Response to University of Minnesota inquiry I h G4 KMAY c ~`, ~ A ~_ ~J '1''; ~-'"'b ~ _~ 1 1' ~1 ~ r; r r J ~~ ~ 0 I'fl]LaLV~% H 11Lt'+ i -~ ATTACHMEI3T A Q rwlw t i ~~, Q ~ ~'~~ IE ~r '1 O ". ~ 11~i0M T~ 1 1 ~ r~ .. ~' - ----- J/~' -~ - r i ; ; ~. f • _ _~] mac, k. x, ~ D ~'J ~b~ t~t~~ ~ ~ ~r~ 1 ~i _I I ~ O ~ '~ I - o ~ ~ ~~~- _ ~~~ 7 ~ z o t J 1 ~ -~ ~ ~~ z 0.(K~~uO t'/~. . i 1 1 T IConat:~t IPoli~ ~ X r CITY OF FALCON BEIGATS BEQUEST FQR COj3NCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda I~em: F-4 Seeiing Datt:ll/8/:89 ITE*iDESCRIPTION: REPORT ON THE CITY EASEMENT ON THE EXTENSION OF FOLWELL AVENUE IN AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 90 IN THE UNIVERSITY GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBMITTED BY: University of Minnesota REVIEUED BY• Susan Hoyt Taff , City Planner Jan Wiessner, City Administrator Planning Commission EXPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach .additional sheets as necessary): The University of Minnesota is requesting the City to vacate its easement on the extension of Folwell Avenue so the University may sell the additional land as part of Lot C for a dwelling unit (see Attachment A and Attachment B). Information you may wish to consider when making your decision is: 1. Lot C is large enough for a single family dwelling as it exists without the additional land because it was platted before the current Zoning Code (9-2.03), although the lot is 1,284 sq. feet less than the current 10,000 sq. foot requirement for a City lot. 2. The City does not require the easement for utilities or~ streets. .. 3. A larger dwelling could be built if the lot is larger. 4. Any future development on the soccer fields would most logically be accessed from Cleveland. S. The easement or a portion of the easement ma.y be used for pedestrian access to the proposed walkway included in the City of Falcon Heights Park Plan. There are currently three. access points from the Grove neighborhood to the east (see Attachments C & D). 6. The adjoining land use to the west is a single family dwelling. To the east is open space, which the University is landscaping next to the University tennis courts. The Planning Commission reviewed this at its 11/6/89 meeting. ACTION REQUESTED: Response to the University of Minnesota inquiry. i r I J ' L ~ V ~] ~J. Q IKMaY M-~s,L~ r Qa .,~ r• ~ r m- R- ~~ ~ ~ , ~ H J ~ ~ -' J ~id1~ , ~ AGF~~ *~ F_ ~ ATT'AC: ~, A uo~~ cow G_, -~ r~, ,~ J ~ 3' l ~ ~ ~ 1 -~ ~- ~ ~ ~ r Z ~ 0 D Rtvti~~ q i j r t i 9-2.03 Lot Provisions J ~i'Llviy~ ~1 ~ 3nbdiviaion 1. Restrictions. A lot of record existing upon the effective date of this Cbapter which does not meet the requirements of this Chapter as to area or xidth may be utilised for single familydetacheddwellingpurposesprovideditiszonedresidentialandthe mess urements of such area or Width are Within sixty six and tWO thirds 66 2/3x) percent of the requirements of this Chapter, but said lot of record. shall not be yore intensively developed unless combined ~•ith one 1) or more abutting lots or portions thereof so as to create a lot meeting the requirements of this Chapter. S. oTc r Welk Z-S ~~ lCVfw~IMF ~Z~ o Q0. EO ~.•~~1~' AGENDA ITEM F-~' ATTACHMENT C GREEN WAY CORRIDORS LINDIG MINI AND FALCON HEIGHTSLARPENTEURCOMMUNITYLINEARPARKGARDENELEMENTARYAVENUEPARKPARKSCHOOL i off[-~.~~^. _ ' __ _. " `, i~ ~ - J Howe .- _.~ = I w+wn. a .- ... ~.-_ _ :: s: w~~. .~ ! ~_ e i ~ ... c i mii i • . . LN`~ II~IOT~ OI 1~1pf~ I ~ ~ i I I I { f .._ ... "'~_'b100~O~Y111CLLT1111[ ~ ~ ~ I I ~s -.. UNtYERSITY ~•a~J ~ ~~-~`~ ~ ~ _~ IDAHO/SNELUNGGROPE ~, PARK a ~~ ~~ ~~ PARK FOLWEIL LINEAR ~.~~ _°- -- - _- ~~ PARK - ` , ~ -+; ~ r..~,. ~~ .,.~ , . `~ !fir c U ~' FA1CC)N HEIGHTS a1` ~ .~ i :c. ~» ~ w..,....~ 4 '!J` .,CQ SNELLING AVENUE FIGURE 15 Pack ariC~ ReCI'eat1011 Plan PARK SYSTEM MASTER PLAN Cit~• of Falcon Hei~hts,'~Iinnes~ta 8~ or I Nwrwvn a rrawr• i i 1 m...... i o r i ) ;~ ~ ACCESS TO LAUDERDALE AGENDA ITEM F~, ATTACEIlHENT B ACCESS TO ROSEVILLE f gr i~ -_ ~- 1leY IJ ~, _ i i ,1. ~ ;ML• y! 1 ._Y ~ ~Y~ ~ . F 0~ ;~ ;__....._ .__ ;~ u«voum a rrusou r ~ e ~ ~ ,- .. _.................... !~ F 1 G3u ~t'i ~_ ~_ It c ~ - ~ __ ~ o F r ACCESS TO ST. PAUL FALCON HHGHTS r b i:.-c_ Existing Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail Proposed Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail Proposed Pedestrian Trail ACCESS TO ST. PAUL FIGURE 14 Park and Recreation Plan BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PLAN Cite of Falcon H~i~ht~, ~1innesc~ta O 79 Coupe ;t I Fo21r y X r CITY OF PALCON BEIGATS BEQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Item: F-5 Meeting Date:11/8/89 ITEM DESCRIFTION:pROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE NUISANCE CODE, 8-1.01 SUBD. (k) AND THE ZONING CODE, 9-4.01, SUBD. 3(k) AND 9-2.04, SUBD. 1(k) TO ALLOW COMPOSTING AREAS AND STRUCTURES. SUBMITTED BY: Staff REVIEiiED BY: Susan Hoyt Taff, City Planner _ Shirley Chenowebh, City .Clerk Solid Waste Commission Planning Commission fl~LANATION/SUGARY (attach additional sheets as necessary): Currently, composting is not allowed in the City of Falcon Heights under the Nuisance Code. The existence of composting areas within the City, and the termination of the collection of yard wastes by local haulers in 1990 suggest that a composting ordinance is timely. The purpose of the ordinance is (1) to allow small- scale residential composting, (2) to define acceptable composting materials, and (3) to regulate the size the location of the compost area or structure. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on 9-4.01, Subd. 3(k) anal 9-2.04, Subd. 1(k) at its 11/6/89 meeting. ACTION REQUESTED: Adoption of proposed amendments r II. f °. Public Hearing on: Agenda Item E-1 ATTACHMENT A 9-4.01, Subdivision 3, Permitted Accessary Uses. k) One c st area, or one c st structure as defined in 9-2.04, Subdivision 1(k of leaves, rass cli in s, and lant trimmi s not includin fruits and vegetables not to cover more than twenty-five (25 square feet in area and five (5) feet in height in the rear yard. A larger composting area requires a Permitted Accessory Use Permit. 9-2.04, Subdivision 1, Accessory Building and Structures. k) One GN/V J-'J. V1 / Permit. A Use Permit. structure for area an~five ure that meets bdivision 3(k~ not to cover more than twenty-five (25) In height in the rear yard. A this: requirement, 9-2.04, Subdivision 1(c) does not require a Permitted Accessory Use structure rewires a Permitted Accesssorv III. Nuisance Code: (Not included in Public Hearing) 8-1.01, Subd. 2. Junk, Trash, Rubbish and Refuse. Subdivision 2. Junk, Trash Rubbish and Refuse. In any area within the City the storage or accuumulation of junk, trash, rubbish or refuse of any kind, except refuse stored in such a manner as not to create a nuisance for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days is illegal. The term "junk" shall include parts of machinery or motor vehicles, unused stoves or other appliances stored in the open, remnants of wood, decayed, weathered or broken construction materials no longer suitable or safe, approved building materials, metal or any other material or cast-off material of any kind whether or not the same could be put to any reasonable use. The exception to this is the stora a of leaves, rass cli in s and lant trimmi s (not includin fruits and v etables in accordance with sections 9-2.04, Subdivision 2(k and 9-4.01, Subdivision 3 k The compost shall be maintainer according to acccepted composting practices for the residiential yard as described by the most current University of Minnesota Extension Service publication. t Polir ~ g 7 CITY OF FALCON HEICATS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda I:em: F-6 11/8/89 Meeting Date: ITE.'i DESCRIPTION: ADOPT ASSESSMENT POLICY SUBMITTED BY:Terry Maurer, City Engineer REVIEWED BY:Jan Wiessner Tom Gedde ' II~LANATION/SU!~L-~SARY (attach additional sheets as necessary): Attached is the final draft Assessment Policy manna l which, if acceptable, can be approved as City policy. ACTION REQUESTED:Review and discuss Assessmenr Policy draft. Approve if acceptable. IConae-t IPoli~ ~ X C7 CITY OF FALCON flEIGATS BEQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda I_em: F-7 Stating .Date: 11 /8 /89 ITE*i DESCRIPTION: COUNCIL RETREAT SUBMITTED BY: Jan Wiessner and Carol Carlson REVIEWED BY: LANATION/SjMKARY (aitach additional sheets as necessary): Carol Carlson has checked into several alternative locations to conduct the annual Council Planning Retreat. A matrix is attached which summarizes the alternatives. It is difficult to compare costs because the facilities differ a great deal; however, the cost comparisons include the following assumptions: 1. Eight rooms (However, at Afton House it woul-d be 4 singles and 2 double rooms) 2. 3 meals (dinner Friday night, breakfast and lunch Saturday). 3. Coffee and soft drinks for Saturday. 4. .Thanksgiving week-end (Fri. evening and Saturday). We have made tentative reservations at the following facilities: Cost Estimate White Bear Country Inn $600 Holiday Inn-Roseville 610 Afton House 720 Hilton 700 NOTE: The special rate we received last year at the Hilton is no longer available. The cost for the same rooms this year would be $1,018. Also attached are proposals from. two consultants who could be hired to conduct the team building (or planning) parts of the retreat. A. Don Salverda's rates are:-$600 for 1/2 d,ay (or, evening) 800 for full day (plus materials). B. Jim Brimeyer indicated to me that he would do the team building Friday evening for $350-$400 (including materials). C. No facilitator - We could purchase the Geier Profiles and Jan(?) could facilitate for $10 each. ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Select Location 2. Decide whether a facilitator should be used. i• I i N roIv ro I o 0 0 0 0 o aNiI °o o n I "'m 1p o M vyo W 0I H Iro O ry I o ro Q 1J Ol 41i y.t ~F ~m H N ro i,W ti O a, •r ro w •tivaSO ^I v •C N m ro y ro O\O 3 v q,v a v m I a,\v a a U\~ya roa v avAUN ~ m firy A N y N a CN a a.yvlaorovmUaaoroo0CITro0roUANNrowroO "I N O ro ~a N ~a fi 3\ary o y cy\y\a fi vy +~ \ ~I ro v ro t roOC^iN Oi ti C g ry N~ry+~ ~ cao A N wti~vcaw~Aa 3 4 fi ro v I o A ~ ro 3 I ~ y m y al m ti 0,N N O O N N O O N N N Rro ~ a fi fi N a,a C fi a,a,a,tiU voroiaN ro I ro I I v v O I cn N Ql •ti ti b+ N A m N y yUroiNAfiroyrororovro owNavroNrowNrowN .c w N a,w N ox .c v ro +, ~ro w x .c v w N m .c v u c v N x •c v N ro o c ro •~v ro u c x •c v ro u c ro u c ro roo fiyvl:fi oro a,Nvfi~roue vcfio vcfi.c vfifi TWINa •N ro >O N a •ti v g fi N a •ti q N a •ti U N a -ti fiWNqNrovWNqNa •ti.A N A aq N A.W N q ti ro N C a aq N q I Oofiaofirnho ~n ro fi a., fi 0 Nlnlnrn rn morn o~n ti N Ol H ~N N N 61 O1 y V1 O h y rn ro ro \O ec~M op .N.H n. I w \ N N q m co •-I o .y w •~ •-~c~ mIIirok .c v v O I I I I I I l l~o 0 0~i I r o ti ~ ~c~ro Uw y N~~ o Inu~u~u~v~~n 0 00o O ono ro NU10~v fiw v 1N01~1 rnrnrn rn o o ono v ~N a O N R,H rr ~ O N k CN ut O1 W N U O ul ~ ^i M V• v1 lp o~ .y I t~, ry I O I H I O O y O O O ry O h ul y O ro I D ry R,tn.V),fiOoCNUoNroO ~ N N vl 0 I C v 0 ti N ro N ro ti 7, ^I N O F y b 'H '>0 H H v y N bl FbiAInOvNC •r N O•0~ W 0, N C 0 rnqabiON •-i N ti ~ 1J 1 C U C U H O F. C( '^~ O O E N I a R,u1 O a O O H k H k y N Obau0u\O U 00 y N y v O I \\O Q~U1 UI O O N 41 u1 O NvvlulONyOOkt~ to O h O y O O roNIOlOlOa1vFNWCMWUO ^i O ry NINtiNNNrnCCro.ro rn Af1] I N f~N v fi H O N CF O fi v V~ v O~ v M O V~ CF M R~ O tp ro V~y ~- •H V~ N ro vl F V• F.v>N a fi m w w ro v v ro ro N M I a,a a,a y q a,a,tio ~ ro o,v ro vro v v o y ro v ro roofaroefiroEvroo,N fi ro a ro w .c x a o \o aro \N a \ oa H ro tio o t"Q c oo N o o uiow ~ •~q v U I w v U U -,q q 0 0 a I v 0 ~+1 C N ul 0 0 O v1 O) N vl 0 0OIroHMIUkNnO 'H M O 1 O i.1 N I~k H !\O hU ~ `- va U W `- v~.U W va fi r ~n tq ~- y:W `- v~-v~ vs x y N fi v v ro fi fiHeNNmroa,q qroI-,v o a at ~N H4luro w a,I y ai o ro a a,i., ti ~ N ro N N u ~M fi ro NIN +I y v H C N G O ro O W btiaUU a~p +I O ^i H y E h cb w l a ~a w x x m v a ro 6862 2i.3BW.~AON Q,3HJ21Tf.~S.32f) ifSTfQ SFI.~2iS.'32I AFTON HOUSE INN ine Dining...." njoy the elegant setting of the Wheel oom, where we offer intimate dinners by candlelight. Weekend entertainment, tableside cooking, and excellent service will make your special dinner perfect. The Pennington Room offers a more private setting for weddings or rehearsal dinners, and corporate /client entertaining. Our high standards carry over to daily luncheons, Saturday breakfast, and our famous Sunday Gourmet Brunch. And the Catfish Saloon is right here for casual meals and great hamburgers. A wonderful dining experience for any occasion! Traditional Lodging..." All of the charm of an historic country hotel: Each of our rooms is unique in decor, with antique and reproduction furnishings. We offer the modern convenience of private baths and t.v.'s in of the rooms. everal rooms feature whirlpool tubs the room, some with outdoor balconies overlooking the St. Croix river. There are cozy rooms with a double bed, and spacious rooms with king size beds. Treat yourself to a night or weekend away. Whether you are planning a honeymoon night, a winter ski weekend, or a special gift certificate...the Afton House Inn is worth remembering! And More ..." The Afton House Inn is well equipped to service meetings and seminars. Our peaceful atmosphere invites productive results. And the overnight lodging allows the groups to continue for as many days as you need. And the perfect finish to a long meeting is a relaxing cruise on the St. Croix river in our private charter boat, the "SWEET AFTON". A luxury houseboat, with a capacity of groups from 20-49. Anywhere from afun-filled day in the sun with abeach- side bbq, to ormal cocktail cruise or dinner buffet the boat. Everything for your needs, at the Afton House Inn. G72P/ ~C%~i~2 ~ ~~ :~ eJ ~~ snlaor lalay anlaMl paNadv NNl' asnol{ Nolfy' Ir~s~1{ayl pNn BHUds ayl y~ palaldNlna snM ByyapoNlalf-9861 7aloy n sn asn /ny~B~ro sl1 al asnol{ Nalfy'ayl arolsar of ragNlaldaS H~ panasl snM l~Nlrad asn lmaads saaryd ~~rols~l{1o rals~Ba11/nno~ln~' ayl Na pallyd asnol{ Noafjs^ ayl army vl 11106 spy payanar s~nrn6 ayy' rlarnyy' N~ 5861 Has~1~u3 «rapllntY ay2» oni13 ranrnapovM Nvlf~' fo d/ay ayl yl~M paNB~sap ByyapolNar fv sasnyd 1Uranas Nayl araM arayz slnrn6 Rylnx pan Prpra~ Rq pasnyarnd snm arnlanys aHZ-9L6! yarod panaaras n pNn nlaor BN1N/p N/nn/ ayl BN1ppn aNgl Slyl 'NIn6n pa/apON1a1 NasaapN~' y6n1{raNMO MaN llrnsranlNNn rnaPr ppl ayl roEL96! s11MOl ranlr 1ya aya fo lNaaslNlNlar rnq n rloolnS ysllan~ ayl Na pappn Prayl 9961 N~ J/ paNlrofsNnlJ pNn BH~p1/nq ayl lyBnaq sraRyy' pNn yJ1N1s srssyy'-p961 1fa1y„Prrnyy'raylvyt;', -9461 SraNNlp Na~'Jlya llUpNns' 1nlaadS lay BNlnras NnBaq pNn asno}E Nvlf~' ayl parmban NaIBy~NNad „Rrnyy'rayloyy,', -LO6l E888-9£ti ~Z~9) LOOSS NW `uo~~d 9ZE Xo8 'O'd sra~aas arnsnald yl1M papmcua s/ asnoy ayl sy,NO,N ra1N/Nns ayl BNIrn¢ a1lg3 paoB N7 pNn NadO Jl sdaall JJ7/s af1M sJ~, yms 11a~A~ p pnarana~l ayl asnal{ Nolfy' ayl fa BH~llrlp-1881 pap BH~ysn~-9L81 asnol{NVlfy'ayl sn NMaNy s~ pNn Nrryol sanlnlns lC 7aloy pao>as s yolf}^J)~nq BN~ysn~ ~ sarrny~-L~paNmq laav}E s, Nosraavd l 7a1o1{s,NOSralnd H~ P1ay BNpaaN1, sra;on n an pazlNnBio Nolfy^ fo aBv111n8581 11o1f}~' fo aa~s aNasard ayl paly~nla a1~nX.1yy'rapanxa/y~'-1581 1101f~' lNaBard f0 lSaM a17N/ 7N0 SUM N/1Uf 37}F 'UlOSaNNI~' fO /lrOJlJJal ayl N~ 1Nrnf lsr~ayl ysygnlsa of IN~rya n pa11f llaysnl{ ydaso~' xno~S pNn nmadd~y~ ayl yl~M payanar snM Blnarl U ralf~ 6£8l aar~ sallntY fo ylnaNl ayl In papas sa1111Nnf yanarE aN1oS-L£8l Nalf~' fo ales ayl Main oa sNnadaln3lsrJayl araM asay2 sNmpN~ oMl pNn NaNlyaaar£ rnof Aq palNndNlafan arar~ S ayl NMOp paBaNrnO/ yln~ ap rna1S' '11n10S/lar~ 1'INn(z-0891 905E-9Eb EOOSS B}OS2UU1 W `UO}}y eal x!oa~ ~1S 'S EZEE 0116eg eSll '8 1119 bd uo o~ S~ui 6~0Ib ~~ .E 6 sgSnoH ~,od i(Q,(~Fj 56 ~ 56 81 on u OOL-9£4'uo!~eoen o,( s! ~anu ayl Pue eldeo ayl aie noA leogasnoy ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~//, anxn! e u! 's~an!y dd!ss!ss!y~ g x!oi0 Poo ~,oGU' 1S a41 to s~alem o!uaos ayl as!nip suoi~eoe~ ~eogasnoH U0~{d ~O no ~ 6 19 o S. s s E888-9£b uu! asnoH uo;;y ouo3s!FI lae;uoa suoi;enaasaa G s6u!ppa/N • s6u!;aayy ssau!sne • 7~ ~ sanbl}uy • 56 Z! _© ~sePy1~!8 • sa!3~ed 6u!yoea n s}san0 gq }o ~}laede0 sauossaooy • suo!yse~ s~au6!saa • ta~nm ,} ° f C~uosp~ ((. S' ~d148 aslns0 I(~nxn~ ,qg V NOldt/ 133MS„ S~Oy u SNk L188 uue itlA -1kitl31433N - S3nbllNtl 6E4 LhbL-9E7 w,aoa ~~ aa9 •~NI O~ awoolaM sac}eog ;ua!sueal EUUeI/1J aOInJeS Iln~ d LZ88-9Eb EOOSS NW 'uo;}y 5bZ5-9Eb aago;op - ~(eW !e;uaa ;a!ey0 doys !~s a~!naas Ilnj DOt) b i paau;,uop noA T oS ~iS 3s EE - EL09E X06 looy~s !~s `s}}!la!eyo gE sdoys leluaa g 's}aleUo b f-Dea yoaew -aagwanoN 6u!!~IS O~ L o S f s6u!uan3 leg-~!~j ol L ~I!e0 uadp ~~~A~O o13 9f1101HO~dA'8 1/NIHtlW NOldtl d ® awoy o} asol~ os pue un} y~nw oS ZL£v-8vS-008-1 3F{,L yO V3atl IBS Shc~d NOldV OSLL-8£b-ZL9 II~~ LZOZ-9Eb '1S N Ib'W sa!l~ed l NnS 3H1 N! Nn~ Nltl~d 1Snf uawa~!lay • sallied Aepyi~!8 • A 6 woos sew~s~iy0 aleiogel3 • Adoyguayol~~ lawino0 • ~O~ ~sapossaooy aegeioaaa • ~ L908-9Eb 'aJOw yonw pue S;}16 `sa!pueo 'scone!} pa;eaa~ eueolaawy ~o calls a 6ulaa;~o ~ suo!unay u!ppa/y~ •wej • saues~en!uuy/ sfiu!leayy • se!l~ed yoea8 • V sa~pus0 xex~saag ~ensnu~ • ~ I WO~SnO sauo~ apEWawoy weaa~ aa! leaa6 isnf uey; a~oW ano~avd Wv3d~ 3~1 saaleaa Z E 4 J 'r' - yS II S`dW13S1111ZOIL-9E4 ~ sluawlu!oddy Ag s6u!uan3 e JPa~J~9~21~0 Z1lJ~/'~O so <s s-s 5-0£ l unS S-l l leg-uoyy v z i NOSFitl3d Ntl3f ua~~o ~jaeq auzoa pus ains aq jjinn nod •uoouaa~e ajgeLio[ua ue ao lpua~jaann ~uixejaa a .~a~j~ta io3 •uoos sn ~tstn o~ ~utod e ~i a~jey~j •ino~ o~ saris atzo~sitj se jjann se sdo~js L~ueuz saa~3o ~jas~i unno~ aij,I, •.la~uinn a~j~ ut ~uijigouznnous pue ~un~js jjttjunnop `~uii~js Liz~unoa sso~a o~ liautuzns a~j~ uT 310 pue ~ui~jiq `$uiuxuxinns `$ui~eoq uzoi3 ~ui~j~L~aan~ •uot;eaaaaa punoa-aea~i 3o L~aizen a Lio[ua uea saauoi~eaen pue s~o~isin •Liajjen xioa~ •~S a~j~ ~o ~.zea~j a~j; ui paj~sau si uo~~~ ~o ueno~ ~uienb ayZ l~IL1i `1~IO,L3~' ~I~IO,I,SIH Qi~~' ~~'I'I~'A XI02I~ 'ZS Ii~I~~S ~H,L OZ ~NiO~'I~ ATTITUDE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS, INC. C Roseville Professional Center • 2233 N. Hamline Avenue • Roseville, Minnesota 55113 612) 484-1335 November 2, 1989 Ms Janet Wiessner City Administrator City of Falcon Heights 2077 W Larpenteur Avenue Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Dear Jan, Thank you for the opportunity to visit with you regarding my being part of your November 24-25 Council Leadership Retreat. You, the Mayor, and Council are to be commended for scheduling a retreat that provides the opportunity to share perspectives, develop renewed esprit de corps, and plan for the future in a positive environment. Enclosed is a brief outline of a suggested plan that you might react to, built around a day and a half format, with my leading the Friday evening and Saturday morning sessions. I hope the content and format are in line with your thinking; if not, we can altar accordingly. My fee to plan, prepare for, and lead the retreat is $800, plus 10 per participant for the "Personal Profile System" learning instrument that I would like to incorporate into the session. The instrument is an excellent team building tool that is extremely popular with participants. There would also be an additional nominal cost for other expenses incurred for handout materials, easel pad, etc. I want very much for you to have a high quality retreat that is educational, enjoyable, and meets your overall objectives. I pledge you my best efforts to accomplish all three. Please call on any questions or concerns. Thanks again for your call and conversation. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, ATTITUDE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS, INC Donald E Salverda DES/bjs Attachments c ~:..~ t-~-- G~. t~1~, ~ i, a.w, ~ ~ r~ ~~~d~` ~ i rtt~`c u ~`d~~.c.. c~.-~ `~'~-~. CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS 1989 LEADERSHIP RETREAT I PRIMARY OBJECTIVES 1) To review progress made during 1989 2) To develop concensus on the big issues facing the city 3) To enhance communication and develop renewed esprit de corps among participants 4) To identify and discuss any problem areas 5) To fine tune participants leadership skills 6) To be an enjoyable experience 7) Other II FORMAT OF THE RETREAT The sessions will include a mix of lecturette, group participation and discussion, and individual activities III TIMING AND LOCATION Date: November 24 (evening) and November 25 (morning) Location: To be determined IV PARTICIPANT MATERIALS Each participant will receive an outline and related supplemental handout materials, plus a learning instrument CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS 1989 LEADERSHIP RETREAT SUGGESTED AGENDA FRIDAY 7:00 - 9:00 SESSION 1 ... "WORKING AS A TEAM" A brief presentation that sets the tone for the reteat, followed up with structured group discussion that reviews progress made during the last year. Participants will then participate in a learning experience that is designed to increase harmony and understanding of one another by identifying work behavioral patterns, potential conflict areas, and how to maximize team strenghts. SATURDAY 7:30 - 8:30 Breakfast 8:30 - 10:00 SESSION 2 ... "PROVIDING COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP IN THE 90'S" Structured group participation that is focused on providing community leadership in the 90's. Emphasis will be placed on the changing roles of of the leader and manager. 10:00 - 10:15 Coffee Break 10:15 - 11:45 SESSION 3 ... "DEVELOPING CONCENSUS ON THE BIG ISSUES" Structured group participation that will result in concensus on the major issues and opportunities facing the city. After reaching concensus, the next step is to discuss specific goals and strategies to achieve the goals. 11:45 - 1:00 Lunch 1:00 - 2:30 SESSION 4 ... "GOALS FOR THE CITY - ONE YEAR" To be led by the Mayor Structured group participation that develops a realistic goals program for 1990. 2:30 - 2:45 Refreshment Break 2:45 - 4:00 SESSION 5 ... "SURFACING AND RESOLVING PROBLEM AREAS" An open discussion that surfaces problem areas that can be discussed and resolved if possible 2:45 - 4:15 WRAP UP n C7 I w w• O J VI C V W O v iii d 0 d d a C A g 0 a~.' p ~ ^S' 010+1 C -~ N +0+ •p ~ ~ U 009 "C" ~ F+ ~' '~~' ~"~ y "C ~' ~ s o1 01 0 ~ 01 0 3 Cgryo`~'" `°~'' oo1~a pl C ~ tN "C 4. W a1 D ~.. Q ~y,,O~ O O ry+ ~' ~ C C p~oCi C ~ td A. ~ ~ C ~ ; r O d +, rn W ..r N O a1 y to C O y 0 -" ~ ~ Q. .p Q~ O C .O oCi O opi ~n C v1 ~~ O y 01 ,« RJ O ~ -y. C. ~ ?, O~i to ~ ~ C b v~' 01 01 tp f0 0. •-• Q O o1 p ~ +p' C C U Q ~ Oi C ^ ~ V to t0 c0 d sU. 'C d O C' 01Q. s..'~ O ~(nt C'.:U 01~So....~E~3 ~.~oc1 .c o1 Lyi O 'p +~ d h fw U Q C ~ .,. C ~.O C O d fA U a W o y ~s~ ao o1co~3 .~~ co1=~Qo1 ~ sr y (A +~ d ~ 00'' y p O U ~ 'p ~ O ~. 0'1 U •^+ ~ .C ~3 ~ ~v .ti ,r a ~ d y„ w~ y~ p d~o c1 s a ~ > u 3o1c~=y~c~°' oeo`~i~~coooo o n coo ~ r'~°'~Q aod,~"oU°~~C .... ^C cC ~' ~ ~ t •~ ti..o3+.+.rn o r 0.t 3 .~..1 ° ~ a. o coo O C •~ _°.' r~ c ~ ~° ~ ~ o y O .., m ~ ~ 01ci~ 3 "" o ~ ~ o a ~ o°i o ~, E c `~ ~°°' o d v ~ ~ +. 01 ~ a~ c v~'~ a~ ~ as ox To d~ vv O~~ •O C p v~i vi u p~ 3~ ~.ao yap ~ ao, °coao~'u~ ~-oy~~' E`~xo~ oo~ d~+. ~ ~~o ~~ 01 ~ "y ~ ~ y r, ~ ~ ~~+ y v y '~ v °' a°~ o .ox = x `° C0CB0 H = 01 ro o~ 1 C .b O o.y a 8,~o"'i~ooh,.U '% ~ O d F ~ d ~ o .c .~ ~ ~ d +. ~ O d 17 U w 0. d i d p, ^p oCi ~ Q ar p C~~ ~ (n C~ E C p C~ d d bV •~ ~ 'y V 0 .~ ... p w O C y y y U W O ..., ,~ V O -. O ld 0~i to O '-' C Q~ 'y y~~ y V m U~ ~~ > V pV Q D O Oc O ~ 01 to ..U, H a1 ~ O c0 7 ++ ..l O G ppFr~ .y. '3 W.T. 7 y O y C S (~ ,?d~ tpii p +y+ C C p O C ,t O~ 01 •y Q~ y C l0 r',+ C O U Or in t0 C ~p ,~ y ~ O U ~ .... OA ~ ~ 7 u O `~ C '~+ *O' .C y d 'S.+ .r obi .~ obi C C >' ,. n p OU V O V d C9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 01 G p0o'.~~oo~'ao~oO~uCj;~~etocnU~~u c.~oa~oai.tioroc~~°,~or~~ C a~.:~ o.:: o o~~ ~~ o1C001' ~ y y ~~ ~ C8a ~. •v ... ~ o d ~ .~ :..... AC ~ ... A M 0 B A n A 0 o~ AN 00 ~ oWrt w CI1 CJ1 r-~ r-~ W M O~~~q~npf~~pwOf0rt •~ c '~ ,w,f ~ .w ~ ~• d. y eAOt00t0~'^tAiictCoooo~~,Exmc.~szia+,~,o~oa O f0 ~~.O"C O w ° 'd a• co Ica w ~' C~py'A+ 7~0b _ .:m ~w D C ~.0 nTJ 0.p AAO~E~G~°'CJ O f~0 K rT.,' y rt ,..F ~*' a No w y ~ o O z ~ v 7° f0 e n Ow ~ =~ ~ ~ O .. r.g x, z f0 ~O7dDO c °= n m yrt ° ~ f0 n ~ O Z Ir K ~ N=.~'~ ~ N flimad°c~y 0.Cp„~0.m O 300 A fOE~ od vy .O d~~o.;.=°~~ al~pe'°•,~mAH m y ~' C ~ O ~,C a•mc a°'.o y o A ~'~O^~.n~t m ~ ~ ~ p rt ~1 0.00. rt ~ ~ zo`~~°~aE~Q~~ f0 C1 ~ • y ° ~ f0 sOK'CS~m`<G.W y TM d ~.x~AO~~oC7a~ryoA EE. rt Cb ~~n'A oE~ooc10 ~ 01rtpy3m~~Fnoff. c°o °~x-<o w ywd070AOtfC'f O h ~.° 0.w aA C rt %* ?rt O ^! ~ ~ ? rt Qt gE ° x~.:w ~oooo n Aye E c E o~da~~d O ~ ~p A ,~ f0 S.c 0.~ A 0 0. a.oow~o E O ~ f0 ~ f~0 rt"°.A..W 0xoc o~~o°c~ o• oa-aEO ~-. O ° C f! 'Cy O .w 0. `Y C E rt ~ t0 O D y CA B `< f~0 O' z'< C) 0 ° •c o °'*t C m .+ rt C 'C f'1 c ° wA a, frt0 O rt ~ A ~ <o e~° y rt ~ E~~ w ac :°yo°'r,~r~~10~c~.~^,o AS~0.(rt~ A Q.~~ ~'~o~wEnroo,,C<"roc~ p~tAAdOA.G~'~'~7rt0 rtC'+ ~ rt .A":.E 0.~ ~ ~~ <A f0 rt ~ y tll,~7 O ~t 7 C O ~ y .'. G'< 0. 3 0 A ~ ~ er ~ FALCON HEIGHTS 2077 W. LARPENTEUR AVENUE FALCON HEIGHTS, MN 55113-5594 PHONE (612) 644-5050 FAX (612) 644-8675 November 2, 1989 FOR :COUNCIL WORKSHOP DISCUSSION 11/8/89 T0: Mayor Baldwin and Councilmembers FROM: Jan Wiesner RE: 1990 Budget Revision Alternatives During the 1989 Special Session, the State Legislature passed a new tax bill. Several changes were made in the local government aid law. However, the change having the most impact on cities is an aid transfer to school districts. The City of Falcon Heights' LGA allocation for 1990 has been decreased 27.4% from the 1989 allocation to $199,010. The following chart shows the changes in recent years: 1990 t'1988 Law)1989 Special 1988 1989 Vetoed Bill)Session) LGA 195,005 274,253 308,621 323,865 199m010 CITY TAX LEVY 540,024 497,057 489,800 474,556 599,411* TOTAL TAX REV.735,029 771,310 798,421 798,421 798,421 CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS YEAR 1988 1989 LGA 0 40.6 12.5 18.1 (27.4) LEVY 4.5 (8.0) (1.5) (4.5) 20.6** TOTAL 3.3 4.9 3.5 3.5 3.5 Assumes entire LGA decrease made up with Tax Levy. This is an 11% increase over the 1988 Tax Levy. HOME OF THE MINNESOTA STATE FAIR AND THE U OF M INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURE Strategy 4~1 - Increase Local Property Tax Levy The State Legislature's changes in Local Government Aid distribution during the Special Session were called "transfers to school districts" intending to shift the revenue sources without the taxpayers noticing a change in the overall property tax bill. (See Attachment A, excerpt from LMC's "Cities Bulletin".) State Representative Mary Jo McGuire assured me that the intent of the bill was that the cities would increase property taxes by the same amount the school districts would lower their tax levy amounts. LMC staff member Ann Houle, explained to me that the School District's levy limit would be decreased by the amount of this transfer. The State Legislature also made a provision for cities to include a statement on their Truth in Taxation advertisements clarifying that the reason their taxes are going up is due to the shift in aid to the school districts. Most cities are following this direction from the State Legislature and increasing their tax levies by the entire amount of the LGA decrease. See attached memo from Tom Kelly regarding telephone survey of cities). The 1989 Special Session Tax Law also calls for the repeal of all city levy limits by Pay 1992. Part of the reason for the delay in this repeal is to allow time for restructuring of the aid programs. The intent is that after that time cities will be more accountable to taxpayers for tax increases, less dependent upon State Aid, and the adjustments will have been made. Strategy #2 - Increase Other Revenue Estimated Change 3,140 1. Increase license and permit fees by 10%. 1,000 2. Increase other charges for service, such as Planning fees, City Hall and Park rental fees, dump fees, etc. 2,000 3. Increase miscellaneous revenue 1,000 4. Implement a $4.00 non-resident fee for recreation programs. This would decrease transfer expenditures in the Park and Rec Administrative budget which would offset Recreation Program budget.) 23,000 5. Implement a charge for street lighting to offset estimated 23,000 expense. This could be included with sewer bills. A rough estimate would be a $2.80/quarter charge; however, a more careful study would have to be conducted to determine a fair allocation for residential vs. other uses. The current system of levying taxes does not take into account benefit to non-taxable entities such as the State Fair and U of M for use of street lights). 30,140 Total Other Revenue Option Increases 2 - One concern about this strategy is that all fees and charges should be based on actual costs of providing services. Rather than a simple cross-the-board increase, a study should be conducted to deter- mine appropriate charges. It is possible that some of our existing charges should be lowered and some raised. Other Revenue Sources to Consider: 1. Implement a Recycling or Solid Waste Fee. This needs to be explored further depending upon whether the City decides to get more involved in solid waste removal. 2. NSP Local Tax Implementation: This needs to be explored further but is a revenue source some cities use. J Strategy ~~3 - Decrease Reserve Funds Using the City's reserve funds to finance General Fund Operating Ex- penses is a practice which is strongly discouraged. The only exception to this general rule would be if they are used for items which are known to be of a one-time only, or at least very infrequent nature. The reason for this is that reserves are limited and once spent, cannot be replaced. Some examples of appropriate uses for Reserve Funds would be: Financing of Capital Improvement items Financing of Debt Service payments for capital items Projects such as major building repair (park building or City Hall repair) Studies which would have long-term revenue generating, cost saving or developmental implications for the City Unforeseen major expenditures such as lawsuits Major change in telephone system, Cable TV system, etc. Tree planting or other landscaping projects Land acquisition, buildings or financing for these 1990 Budget Items which could be levied for or paid with Reserve Funds: 40,489 C.I.P. fund annual allocation 15,703 Annual payment for capital note 6,000 Park building repair (Recreation Admin.) 62,192 3 - Strategy ~~4 - Decrease Budgeted Expenses The City Council has already thoroughly reviewed the staff's proposed budget for 1990 and adopted changes. It is our rec- ommendation that. the discussion on how to adjust to the loss of Local Government Aid focus on revenue sources rather than changing the expenditure budget. If the Council feels that the expenditure budget should be reviewed again this can be done in a couple ways. 1. Identify a % dollar decrease eliminated from the budget as each department and let staff 2. Identify programs or projects eliminated. 3. Go through the budget line by you feel appropriate. which should be a whole or from recommend changes. which could be line and cut items At this time, it seems that the first three strategies are viable and do not necessitate overall budget cuts. JW:PP 4 - BUDGET REVISION OPTIONS: A. Levy increase to cover decrease in LGA. B. Levy increase to cover decrease in LGA, and use Reserve Funds to finance short term equipment note annual payment. C. Levy increase, use Reserve Funds to finance short term note payment and annual CIP fund allocations. D. Levy increase, increase other revenue resources. E. Levy increase, increase other revenue resources, and use reserve funds. F. Some combination of A-E with some decreases in budgeted expenditures. G. Increase other revenue, decrease expenditures, use Reserve Funds. H. I. r~ J s wwwwwwwl - wwwww ~~iC~ulGjtjiG~ii~i~ oo ! sn pW+W TN rNl_ •11 kYF W W WWW N NP?Nrrrrr ~•. i -~ i'N ~j r0 WNr GQ rpn ~1?WNr'! WNN-' r r r J` W OOOQOOS W`•O r o-• "" Nr oeGG ooooa~ po 1OrOO ~ N ..1 t7 Z ~ ;Q Z C~ i rx'w -I O a ~ xJ ~cnQ -Im z c m H G~ ~~M~„Qa~~~~ '~ Z 91 ~ ~o~ a ~iQ'~' ~ ~~o ~~~~auQiam`Q m ,Imm~mi Z r~Qnvr r am ~ -1~ ~ m m m .a~w ~r'' a a••maz m a as Q m~ ~ r~~ ~ ~.n~t a~~~~~~oTm~m ~~~n~~ m «,~~~~~ ~~70 I c~ r ~ ~.,o c Im ~m~mx m ~ iaimtn-1 0 dim r~mzar, x g~~~ -I r ~~~ o ~m a~ 1 ~Il~azw'nym ~ .+m-• a~ .• w ~ia tl)rcl~ m coyy-+ ~ ~ 1~1" V ml~a ~n~DD70 ~ ~~-;+~ww mn~3 Q 111`n ~ ~Miwn~ z ~ ~sam~ ~ a3 Uzi ~ ~ aamm m °°-~~ m m~-n°vc ~tom 3 OD Q 04 Q -1 x ~ -i g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~m a a ~ m ummiom c + ~r' ~ 3x~ ~ N a w m < = m m ~ Q 1 1 1 m 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 D m 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 ~ -~ m r111 1 1 N I NW t0 A l " '"• r l i 0~ v ~ r~ u(~O T 1 M y r~ N T O I O~Ntpp r 0~ W O ~j~jg+,~j S 1O~ u C U 1 r l i~V A I ~I Q j~mp0+N0~ W ~I 1 O~r O 011 t0~0m~~ NIOO~N v~ i~ w ~ v ~ gV Y ~ VII O- ~ OOCrO III ~0 1 rrV ~I 1 Wm0 tt 1 I = 1 ; i N i rt ~ r^ ~ a 1~ W ~ N W ? ~ mNf~11Wt1R M 1 { Jlr?~j10 ~AqQ~ ~ropj = Q~ N ~ Q~j 1 +WQ y yyN,,~~QW~ r r$00~00 tA+ OD 1 +o`Ivva+OvvtOA N 1 t+JINtAJItVJ10N O~tA O ~ 1V0~• A 1 QI 1 T fA ~ Q~ ~ 1 P~~rQ 1 ~O ~0 I 1 I ~ j 1 I 1 ~ C r 1 I ~ W N ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ m~r l r ~ -• T 1 r(JI W 1 rtNJ) tJl J 1 W ~IINWLV` ~ 1 i•rWT ?~'Q V 1 d ~ -1 N 1 V I? W 0 1 0 0 f~Ql+i 1 r 1 O 1 0 0 8 1 0 0 1 O ro t O 1 0 O 0 1 0 0 O I ~ O O O ~ I i i 4 0 W O 1 O O O O O O O v l V 1 r 1 1 j ~ 4 i ~ ~ i ~ i I m o t I I I 1 ~ ~, ~ •• I 1~ 4Q1 I I r r l -• r 1 N I ? 1 ~'' r l N ~0 OD I r N V I ~O N •' N t r• ••• m~ uO V 1 m~ ~ 0 d 0~O U I O+N r r W r ~0 U 1 ,D O+ a0 u l rd0t0•' N 0~ 1 O 1 m l Om O Ou-~ ~I 1 +v W O(I+U O'+ N I tatA O A l OTC' W 0+ v' d 1 0-r 1 r( NODO+GON O G 1 t0Q U I 1 I 1 1 1 ~ 1 I 1 1 1 1 ~~ r r 1 1 I 1 W 1 A l ~ 1 D' 1 q ~ 1 S v l m l ~+OQ- O 1 W' N r O 1 0-' JWtti r ~ -' N~ON-' 2~AN u I O 1 m Q I 8= mo o ~_ ~ Q S O O O O O O O ~ j G N Q O N O 1 O O p V O O N O O O O ropp I p 1 C Q SOOOr OIOOSOOS0000 OI O 1 I 1 ~ I I Q ~~.1 1 = ; ~ ; j ~ C rs, v ~ mac.' . r; j 1 ~ I = +1 A; IQt10~1 W 1 t0 1 10 ~`. 1 ~D 1 U I I ~. W r W Q I Q~ JW •" I rr VNmNrr. Wt+1_1N O I V ~ V ~~ u i ~ {norm g i •~ u = ~ro~oueo ~ $' ge~Oe °o i °o~°o~Sogo$vCOO y i ~ 1 gt , ml Elmo of oloo ooeo rl -- N 1 N I Q~ jO ~ ~ ~ NW I ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ vWi I ~ ~ ~ ~ OI CrJ H p j ~ ~ 3W ' v p I t~D ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 H 1 * O I O 1 F'' F'' G bt1 C d F/ O ~ ~ I t,ll t•n C+] tOOIW~'J~ W} W H i ~ C]w6d1~~ v,P O I O ~ v! v ~ z an ~ a ro ~ N N~N I --' 1 v, ~ roowppp~~ ~] ~ API a1 I 01 H1-+W 8 ~ W QIW gg.. F-+ O ~ ;>_ ~--• O ~ ONO ' ONO U1O~ OD ~OND d~ ~- O ~ O Off" u Ul ro rt n o r' r m c fl ~~~GlL6~i~League of Minnesota Cities ~ ~~ Cities Bulletin Number 28 (Interim) October 6, 1989 Lawmakers approve tax bill In a tour around the state on October 3, Governor Perpich signed the $278 mil- lion tax bill into law. On September 29, both House and Senate approved the tax bill with wide margins of support, on a vote of 42 to 24 in the Senate and on a vote of 102 to 27 in the House. Legislative leaders heralded the new tax law as a first step toward reform of the state's property tax system. Compared to the vetoed tax bill, the tax law in- creasesthe state's contribution to school financing by cutting city and township aid and transferring that aid to school districts. The law calls for closer scru- tiny of state mandates and local aid programs and provides more relief to business property than the vetoed tax bill. Law cuts city aid by 84 million The new tax law will cut city aid (local government aid and homestead credit and agricultural credit aid) by an esti- mated $84 million in Pay 1990 relative to the aid levels that the vetoed tax bill would have provided. For cities, this means a $75 million cut in city LGA and a $9 million cut in city homestead and agricultural credit aid (RAGA). Town- ship aid will decrease by approximately 15 million. This city and township aid After the LGA cut in the new tax law,will go to school districts through in- total city LGA under the basic formula creased funding for the basic school in 1990 will drop by $44 million to education program. ~6elei~r.; • ,$331.7 million, down from the 1989 i~_ ~' funding level of $376.4 million. The tax law retains the tax base equalization aid which the vetoed tax bill established and The city aid reduction is lower than the governor's original recommendation which would have cut city aid by $129 million and township aid by $23 million. funds that .program at nearly the full 18.9 million level. See Tax bill, page 3 Law sets new timeline .for truth in taxation hearings The new property tax law includes the final dates and requirements for the truth in taxation process that cities with populations over 2,500 will need to follow this fall. But, even after Governor Perpich signed the bill, sane of the requirements and standards for compliance are not in final form. The Revenue Department, in consultation with House and Senate tax chairs, is developing guidelines for local gov- ernments regarding when they must hold hearings and how to explain the aid shift to schools on truth in taxation notices. Local governments have been sub- jected to several different sets of gtiide- linesfor complying with truth in taxa- tion this year. First, the veto of the legislative tax bill returned cities to existing law with unworkable time- lines, then the attorney general said the Revenue Department had author- ity to issue guidelines for the process in lieu of a special session, and now the special session law, lacking some of the specifics for actual implemen- tation, contains the final guidelines. See Taxation, page 7 Note: The League will publish the next Cities Bulletin on Oct. 27, 1989. Contents Page Articles Lawmakers approve tax bill ..................................... l Law sets new timeline for truth in taxation hearings .............................................1 Regional Transit Board seeking members for three advisory committees ........................6 Hamline to host local government leaders seminar ..............................................8 Transportation study boazd to solicit information from cities .................................9 Election officials offer views on consolidated local election proposal............9 Federal Update ........................................................10 Local government aid preliminary estimates for pay 1990 (print out) ................P 1 Policy Adoption Meeting registration form .......................................Inside back cover The Cities Bulletin is a publication of the League of Minnesota Cities and includes an update of state legislative, administrative, and congressional actions that affect cities. It also includes reviews of metropolitan azea issues by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. League legislative staff members are available to answer your questions concerning legislation relating to cities. The Bulletin lists League and AMM authors of articles and bill summaries by their initials. Chuck Bichler -- CB Jean Mehle Goad -- JMG Thomas Grundhoefer -- TG Sazah Hackett -- SH Laurie Fiori Hacking -- LFH Carla HeyI--CH Ann Higgins -- AH Joel Jamnik -- dd Andrea Lubov -- AL Debra Nyberg -- DN Stanley Peskar -- SP Roger Peterson -- RP Vern Peterson -- VP Barry Ryan -- BR Donald Slater -- DS Peter Tritz -- PT page 2 LMC Cities Bulletin Tax bill, continued The aid transfer represents a, first step toward the governor's original reform goal. of increasing the state's financial support for state-mandated programs that schools and counties provide while de- creasing financial support for "local" services cities provide. A remaining question is whether there will be at- tempts in the future to transfer more city aid to fund school and county programs. The special session tax law will reduce each city's and township's aid by the dollar value of 3.4 percent of its adjusted net tax capacity (taxable assessed value). and generally transfer those property tax relief dollars to the school district in the community. (See the print-out at the end of this B ulletin for an estimate of the city LGA reduction due to this 3.4 percent reduction.) Under the governor's origi- nal plan, city/township aid would have decreased by 5.5 percent of adjusted net tax capacity. The 3.4 percent reduction will first come out of the city's regular LGA allocation for 1990. If the 3.4 percent reduction is greater than the city's entire LGA, then the reductions will come out of city's equalization aid and HACA, in that order. Levy limits (including per capita and market value limits) will automatically change to allow cities to increase their 1990 levies to make up for the loss in LGA. School aid and referendum changes Under the new tax law, ascity/township aid decreases by 3.4 percent of its net tax capacity, state aid to school districts will increase so that school levies will de- cline. The state-mandated education levy will go from a rate of 29.1 percent to 26.3 percent. In addition, the law will equalize 100 percent, rather than 70 per- cent, of school levies for facilities and equipment. The intention of the tax bill is to evenly trans er aid from_cities and townships to school districts in a manner that will, not change tots tax ur ens for ~taxnayers. Eac~ischool district should gain the same October 6,.1989 amount of aid that the city or cities within its boundaries will lose. In the end, the bottom line tax bill for taxpay- ers is supposed to remain the same. However, the aid transfer will not be an even swap in all communities for a number of reasons. Some cities and townships receive less aid than 3.4 percent of their net tax capacities and therefore their schools are likely to gain more aid than the cities will lose. The interactions of the various school aid formulas may result in some school districts receiving more or less aid than the cities or town- ships lose. Out of concern that the cut in school levies may prompt school districts to seek referendum levies, the new tax law contains some limited safeguards: For the November 1989 referendum levy elections, school districts cannot represent to the voters that school taxes will be lower because of the transfer of city/township aid. For all future school referendum levy elections (which will occur on the gen- eral election date in November), school boards must mail to all taxpayers a no- tice of referendum and estimate the impact of that referendum on taxpayers' tax bills. The law stipulates that the notice include the following statement: "In 1989 the Legislature reduced property taxes for education by increasing the state share of funding for education. How- ever, state aid for cities and townships was reduced bya corresponding amount. As a result, property taxes for cities and townships may increase. Passage ofthis referendum will result in an increase in your property taxes." New law doesn't change LGA formula The special session tax plan does not call for any major structural changes in the current LGA formula. The governor had proposed acompletely different formula for Pay 1990, but the Legislature refused to go along with that change. Many legislators expect a change in the city LGA formula next year. However, the law directs the Legislative Commission on Planning and Fiscal Policy to recom- mend LGA changes by November 15, 1990 for the 1991 session. Additionally, the law requires the commissioner of revenue to submit to the Legislature, by January 15, 1991, recommendations for LGA formula revisions. The law also directs the legislative commission to develop a "representa- tive expereliture study of alternative means to assess the relative service needs of cities, counties, towns, and school dis- tricts."The commission must also make recommendations for changes in uni- form accounting and financial reporting methods "necessary to assure public and legislative oversight of expenditures tay cities, counties, towns, and special serv- ice districts." The legislative commis- sion is an 18-member bipartisan House- Senate Committee with power to hire an executive director. For Pay 1991, the tax law will restrict city LGA increases for Pay 1991 to 25 percent of the LGA increases allowed under the law. While the LGA formula itself did not change, the rate of in- creased funding for Pay 1990 and 1991 declined. The vetoed bill had restricted LGA increases in 1990 to 50 percent of the rate increases in the law and that resulted in a $30.4 million increase. The 25 percent provision will approximately cut in half the expected 1991 LGA in- creases. Levy limits The tax law calls for repeal of all cif levy limits (overall, pecrapita, and tax rate limits)~Pa~ 1992, and county levy limits by Pay 1993. According to law- makers, part of the reason for the de- layed repeal of levy limits is to allow time for restmcturing aid programs. All other levy limit provisions are identical to the vetoed tax bill. (See Cities Bulle- tin, No. 22 for complete description.) The tax law restricts the levy limit three percent and byone-halfthe Qrowth m population or households, whichever r.___--.- ~°-----~.._.... See Lawmakers, page 4 page 3 i Lawmakers, continued is greater. In preparing budgets and esti- mating total revenue (LGA plus levy), cities should refer to the vetoed tax bill levy limits which the Revenue Depart- ment certified in September. Cities will be able to increase their levies to com- pensate for LGA lost in the transfer to schools. Property classifications The new tax plan calls for the eventual reduction in the number of pmpeliy classes from 21 to eight. The law renames the new net tax capacity percentages as "class rates."The classes of property receiving the most relief are middle- and upper- valuedhomesteads, and rental and busi- ness property. Since last week's Bulle- tin, the rates on high-valued business property and rental property have changed. See table.) Homestead relief The final tax law will provide an esti- mated $131 million in tax relief to resi- dential homestead property. Of that amount, $45 million will go to the lower tier of home value (under $68,000 in value), $58 million to the middle tier of home value (between $68,000 and 100,000) and $28 million for the upper tier of home value (over $100,000). Funding for the additional homestead relief, as well as the relief to businesses and rental property, will come mainly from an expansion of the homestead and agricultural credit aid (HACA) program. Had the state not provided additional aid to local governments to cover the cost of rate reductions on these classes ofprop- ertythe tax burden would have shifted to other classes, particularly farms and cabins. The class rates for homes will decrease to one percent for the first 68,000 of value; two percent on the home value between $68,000; and 100,000 and three percent on the value over $100,000. Homestead targeting credit The tax law also includes a new target- ingcredit program for Pay 1990 through page 4 Class rates, current law compared to new tax law Property Class Pay 1990 Pay 1990 Previous Law New Law Residential homestead: under $68,000 1.0096 1.0046 68,000-$100,000 2.50 2.00 over 100,000 3.30 3.00 Blind/disabled homestead 0.40 0.40 Rental property: fewer than four units 3.50 3.00 4 units or more 4.10 3.60 Title II subsidized apts.2.50 2.40 Farmers Home Admin.1.50 1.70 (2.0 in 1991) CommerciaVlndustrial and Public Utility: under $100,000 3.30 3.30 (3.0 by 1993) over $100,000 5.25 5.06 Farm non-homestead: House, garage, one acre 2.70 3.00 Remainder 1.665 1.70 (1.5 by 1992) Agriculture homesteads: House, garage and one acre: under $68,000 0.805 1.00 68,000-$100,000 2.20 2.00 over $100,000 2.20 3.00 Excess land and building value: under $68,000 excess to 320 acres 1.12 0.40 excess over 320 acres 1.295 0.40 68,000-$100,000 excess to 320 acres 1.44 0.40 excess over 320 acres 1.665 0.40 over $100,000 excess to 320 acres 1.44 1.30 (1.5 by 1992) excess over 320 acres 1.665 1.70 (1.5 by 1992) Seasonal recreational commercial: Homestead resorts under $32,000 0.90 0.40 (1.0 in 1993) over $32,000 0.90 1.00 Seasonal resorts 2.60 2.40 Seasonal recreational residential 2.30 2.40 Public Utility: Machinery 4.60 5.06 Vacant land, Mineral, Railroad 5.25 5.06 LMC Cities Bulletin r~ J 1995. This credit was originally part of the vetoed tax bill. The final tax law scales down the credit somewhat from the original version of the compromise tax plan. Under the targeting credit, the state will pay owners of homestead prop- erty for a portion of the property tax increase in excess of 10 percent. In 1990 and 1991, the percent of taxes that the state pays will be 75 percent of the first $250 of the increase (over the 10 percent threshold) and 90 percent of the increase over $250. The amount to which the 75 percent rate applies will increase in 1992 to $275; in 1993 to $300; and in 1994 to $325. In order to qualify for this credit the tax must increase by at least 40. The $40 minimum threshold will rise to $60 in 1992; $80 in 1993; and 100 in 1994. There is no maximum credit amount. The law eliminates the 250 maximum on the credit for Pay 1989.. Beginning in 1990, the law limits the appropriation to $7 million for this tar- geting credit. The limit drops to $6.5 million in 1991, $6 million in 1993, and 5.5 million in 1994. If the cost of the credit exceeds these appropriation lim- its, the commissioner of revenue must make proportionate reductions in the credit and threshold amounts. Business, rental relief CommerciaUindustrial property will receive $106 million in additional relief under the new law, up from the $85 million in the. vetoed tax bill. This relief was not as much as the governor origi- nallyrequested since the costs ofprovid- ingthatrelief, especially in future years, are extremely high. The govemor had recommended reducing the top rate of 5.25 percent on business property to five percent in 1990 and gradually to four percent by 1999. Instead, the new tax law sets up a struc- ture to allow aphase-in of additional business relief in future years. Begin- ning in Pay 1991, the tax rate on 10 percent of the property tax levy on busi- ness property value over $100,000 will October 6,1989 be at the lower rate of four percent, while the rate on 90 percent of the levy will be atthe base rate of 5.06 percent. This will yield a class rate of 4.954 percent on commercial/industrial value over 100,000. If the governor recommends future business rate reductions, the tax law requires the govemor to identify the funding source to finance the business rate reduction. Unlike the vetoed tax bill, the law appro- priates up to $10 million fora commer- ciaUindustrial equalization refund for businesses in communities which have local tax rates in excess of 100 percent. Businesses could receive a refund equal to 75 percent of their property taxes in excess of a 5.06 percent effective tax rate, up to a maximum refund of $4,000. The refund is effective for two years: Pay 1990 and 1991. If the $10 million appropriation is insufficient to cover the costs of the refund, then refund amounts would decrease proportionately. The new tax law would also remove the four percent sales tax on capital equip- mentfor new and expanding businesses. Apartment and rental property will also receive $100 million in property tax relief in Pay 1990 under the new tax law through a reduction in the class rates for rental property. HACA changes The governor's original tax bill called for a phased elimination of city HACA beginning in Pay 1991. (HACA is homestead and agricultural credit aid" and is the replacement aid for the old homestead credit program which was also known as transition aid.) The new tax law does not call for such an elimina- tion of city HACA. Instead, beginning in Pay 1991, HACA payments will re- flect increases in the consumer price index and increases in the number of households. (The law does not specify whether the state will use a statewide or communitywide increase in househods.) HACA payments may also change if homestead value changes as a portion of a taxing unit's total property value. For schools, HACA payments will be part of the basic education fomn-la and will reduce school levies beginning in Pay 1990. Counties, will continue to receive HACA payments but they will decrease by the costs the state incurs as a result of the state takeover of county court costs, income maintenance, and certain human service programs. Local hotel-motel taxes The special session tax law will grant cities and townships the authority to levy a local hotel-motel tax of up to six percent, effective January 1, 1990. As under prior law, the city must dedicate 95 percent of the first three percent of the tax proceeds to a local convention or tourism board. However, the remaining three percent of the tax proceeds would be available for general government purposes.. The two other local option taxes the govemor proposed, acounty-wide sales tax and service fees for tax-exempt prop- erty, are not part of the new tax law. City lobbying costs The tax law requires local government ' units, including cities, to report to the state auditor any payments they made in the previous year to a lobbyist and to any staff person not registered as a lobbyist but who spends over 25 percent of his/ hertime during the legislative session on legislative matters. The state auditor must prescribe the reporting forms, but as of yet there is not clear definition of "lob- bying activities." Local governments would need to file the reports by January 31, 1990 and each year thereafter. The League will be working with the state auditor's office to determine how this provision covers League lobbyists and to streamline the reporting process for cities. Mandate review The tax law does not include the gover- nor's recommendation for repealing See Tax, page S page 5 Tax, continued nearly all local aid and state mandated programs to force their review. Instead the law calls on the Legislative Com- mission onPlanning and Fiscal Policy to work with the administration and inten- sively review aid programs and man- dates. Some of the programs the com- mission will review include LGA, HACA, disparity reduction aid, talc increment fi- nancing, and fiscal disparities. The commission will conduct a study of state-local finance andmake recommen- dations on the level of state aid to local units, basic levels of local need, bal- ances of local revenues and options, relationship of local taxes to individu- als, ability to pay, and financial report- ing by local units. The new tax law makes a distinction between state mandates and non-pro- grammandates. State mandates are those programs and procedures that state law requires local governments to finance, deliver, or perform. The law states that these state mandates are worthy of state compensation. Non-program mandates are not worthy of state compensation and the law defines them as mandates which apply equally to private entities and local units or which relate to the basic organization and institutional operation oflocal units. The law catego- rizes most of the costly city mandates, particularly those in the personnel area comparable worth, binding arbitration), as non-program mandates. The law attempts to strengthen the fiscal note process by requiring such notes for any bill proposing a new or expanded mandate on local governments. The fis- calnote is to idendfythe projected fiscal impact on both the state and local units. The department of finance will receive a 100,000 appropriation to implement the fiscal note provisions. State takeover of county costs Beginning in Pay 1990, the state takes over most county court costs--a provi- sion that is identical to the vetoed tax bill. By Pay 1991, the law obligates the state to takeover the base costs of in- come maintenance as well as the future growth in income maintenance and re- latedsocial programs. In exchange, each county's LGA or HACA would decrease by the amount which state costs increase due to these takeovers. Property tax refund circuit breaker The new law extends the refund pro- gram for homeowners to people with incomes up to $60,000. The governor had proposed a $40,000 limit, while the vetoed bill called fora $50,000 ceiling. The renters refund program has a maxi- mum income level of $35,000. LFH Tax increment financing Tax increment financing provisions in the new tax law are the same as those contained in the vetoed tax bill, except for effective dates. Details on the tax increment provisions of the vetoed bill were in Cities Bulletin, No. 21. Most of the bill was enacted, October 4, 1989. The following provisions apply to dis- tricts cities established after October 4, 1989: Buildings, streets, utilities, or other improvements must occupy parcels rep- resenting 70 percent of the area of a redevelopment district; Published notice of the public hearing must include a map which shows the area from which the city will collect tax increments and the area in which it will spend tax increments; Cities may shorten the maximum dura- tion of tax increment districts; Cities must spend 90 percent of the tax increment in redevelopment districts to correct the conditions that allowed the city to designate the area as a redevelop- ment district; Street improvements on streets that are adjacent to parcels in a district will not satisfy the four-year "knockdown" rule except forconstrnction ofa new street or substantial reconstruction of an existing street; and Cities need to send requests for certifi- cation of a new TIF district or amend- ments or modifications to established districts to county auditors by July 1, 1990 in order for the auditor to recog- nize them in the calculation of tax ca- pacity rates (currently October 10 cut off). The law sets income limits for housing districts. AL Regional Transit Board seeking members for three advisory committees The Regional Transit Board (RTB) is seeking members for three advisory committees to the board. The RTB is the short to mid-range transit planning and policy making agency in the seven~ounty metropolitan area. The advisory com- mittees play a key role in the develop- ment ofpolicies for transit in the metro- politan area. The three committees are the Transit Accessibility Advisory Committee, Rideshare Advisory Committee, and Private Operator Advisory Committee. Applications and qualifications infor- mation are available at the Regional Transit Board offices. The deadline to submit applications is October 24,1989. The final committees will be approved at the RTB meeting on November 6, 1989. For more information and an applica- tion, ca11292-8789. page 6 LMC Cities Bulletin Taxation, continued 1990 Truth in Taxation Timeline October 23, 1989 Department of Revenue certifies 1990 LGA pay- ments to all cities Department of Revenue certifies levy limits to cities with populations over 2,500 By November 15, 1989 Cities with populations over 2,500 adopt preliminary budget and certify proposed tax levies to county auditor Dates to be announced Cities with populations over 2,500 hold public hear- ings and advertise hearings five weekdays before hearings By December 28, 1989 All cities must certify final levies to county auditor. Levies for cities over 2,500 cannot exceed November 15 proposed levy amount. Budget hearing schedule The Revenue Department will notify cities soon of the final schedule for budget advertisements and hearings this fall. The procedures for scheduling hearing dates will be the same as those previ- ously established. Counties will select meeting dates first, followed by school districts next, and cities will chose last. The Revenue Department had consid- ered establishing a hearing schedule of specific dates to be used by each level of local government. The League met with the Revenue Department to stress that such timeliness would not allow cities adequate flexibility. Cities may have to repeat hearings The constantly changing requirements for Pay 1990 truth in taxation led many cities to proceed with their budgeting and hearing processes according to their charter, existing law, Revenue Depart- mentguidelines, or a combination of all three. Many cities, having operated according to timelines other than those included in the special session bill, are finalizing their budgets and have sched- uled their hearings; other cities have reduction. Publication of a second budget hearing notice could again cost a city between $200 and $600 (estimate for metropolitan newspaper publication). According to the Revenue Department, cities will not have to work under initial levy certifications they may have made in August or September before passage of the tax bill. In addition, the special session truth in taxation law overrides timelines in city charters, Plan B statutory city rules, and other laws which set forth requirements and schedules for budget and levy hear- ings and certification. Newspaper advertisement requirements for 1990 The newspaper advertisement require- ments will be similar to the guidelines the Revenue Department issued in June with one imporiantexception, citiesmay explain the effect of their LGA loss in the advertisement. The tax bill author- izes cities to "include a statement that part of a percentage increase in property taxes...reflects a transfer of state aid dollars from the city to the school dis- trict to reduce school district taxes, and is not caused by increased city spend- ing." The Revenue Departmnt and House and Senate tax committee staff are pres- ently developing language to explain the potential change in levy amounts. They have said that in explaining the aid shift, cities should be as precise as possible. already held their budget hearings and adoptedtheirlevy. Unfortunately, cities which change their levies as a result of the tax law must publish another news- paper advertisement and hold an addi- tional set of public hearings. Senator Doug Johnson (DFL-Cook), Senate Taxes Committce Chair, was very concerned with achieving a truth in taxa- tion system this year that closely ad- hered to the truth in taxation program in the vetoed bill. The law includes the following language: If a taxing authority has published a notice or had a public hearing prior to the date of final enactment of this act that does not comply with the provisions of this section, or if a proposed levy or adopted levy will change as a result of the provisions of this act, the taxing authority must publish a correct notice and hold a hearing that complies with the provisions of this section." This clause requires cities which in- crease levies as a result of the aid cut to repeat the certification, advertising, and budget hearing process within the new timeline that the Revenue Department is setting. Levy limits will change to allow cities to levy the full amount of the aid The print-out at the end of this Bulletin includes a column indicating "aid reduc- tionfor education" (column #5). This is an estimate of the amount of aid the city will lose. The city can use this figure to estimate the portion of a city's levy increase (or reduction in a city's levy decline) due to the state aid shift. The League would encourage cities to take this opportunity to accurately explain to citizens the changes in state aids to cities for 1990. The Revenue Department will be mailing sample language to explain the change to cities shortly. See Timeline, page 8 October 6,1989 page 7 Timeline, continued The newspaper ad must also indicate the following: 1) Hour, date, and place of hearing; 2) Total dollar amount of 19901evy; 3) Percent increase or decrease between 1989 and 1990; 4) A separate indication of the amount of any voter referendum the local unit will hold after the public hearing; S) An invitation to all citizens to attend and participate in the hearing. Special notice requirements affect cities that are wholly within the seven-county metro area. Notice publication must be in the com- munity section of either the Thursday edition of the Star Tribune or Wednes- day edition of the Pioneer Press Dis- patch, whichever goes to the greatest number of people within the city. Cities in the seven-county area have received contact information from the Star Trib- une specifying .the advertising account representative and phone number to contact to arrange for their budget hear- ing advertisement. Cities arranging for advertisements in the St. Paul Pioneer Press should contact Valerie Jones at 228-5327. For cities outside the metro area, notice publication must be fulfilled according to the following priority where avail- able: 1) A daily newspaper published in the city for circulation within the city; 2) The weekly newspaper of the greatest circulation that is printed in the city for circulation within the city; 3) A daily newspaperprintedinthecounty inwhich the city is located for circulation within the county; 4) A weekly newspaper of the greatest circulation published in the county for circulation within thc county. Other requirements are that newspapers used for notices outside the metro area must be "sold," regularly contain news articles of general interest, be delivered duectly to subscribers; or if there is no newspaper of general interest sold within the city, the notice may be published in a free newspaper if it is delivered and of general interest. Although the special session law ne- glected to include information on the size and print type requirements for Pay 1990, the Revenue Department has said that, in determining compliance with the truth in taxation requirements, they will expect local governments to adhere to the publishing guidelines the department issued in its August 25 memo. Delayed mailing of final property tax statements Under the special session bill, the re- quirementfor mailing final property tax statements will be April 15, 1990 (cur- rently January 31). The Revenue De- partmentexpects that most counties will not have difficulty meeting this dead- line. For 1990, this allows taxpayers one month before the unchanged May 15 deadline for the payment of the first half of property taxes. Hamline to host local government leaders seminar More than a dozen of Minnesota's gov- ernment leaders are on the agenda of a public management seminar from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m on October 13 at Hamline University, 1536 Hewitt Ave., St. Paul. Hamline's Master's of Public Admini- strationprogram issponsoring the semi- narcalled "The Changing Metropolitan Environment." Larry Bakken is execu- tivedirector of the master's program. Minnesota's government leaders who will address participants include George Latimer, mayor of St. Paul; Ann Wynia, commissioner of human services; Jan Smaby, director of the Office of Drug Policy; R. Thomas Gillaspy, state de- mographer; John Brandl, state senator; Don Fraser, Minneapolis mayor, Curtis Johnson, executive director, Citizens League; and Charles Slocum, executive director, Minnesota Business Partner- ship. Latimer will give a keynote lunch- eon address at noon at Hamline's Sorin Hall Cafeteria, 1536 Englewood Ave. The special session bill eliminates the March settlement date for payments o(' property tax proceeds from the county auditor to local governments. The May settlement date will, therefore, will be the first time cities receive property tax revenues. Tax statements to describe aid shift Next year's property tax statements will differ from those in previous years be- cause the statements will show both the current and previous year's property tax for each level of local government. The new tax law also requires the Revenue Department to nsfer of state aid otrown to the Truth in taxation requirements for Pay 1991 and after The truth in taxation program for Pay 1991 received less attention during this special session, as efforts focused on the next several months. The law, however, clearly states that the requirements will extend to all cities, including those with populations under 2,500. The League will be updating cities on the Pay 1991 truth in taxation process in more detail next spring. SH develop meaningful solutions to current and future problems caused by demo- graphic changes in the Twin Cities. It will include panel discussions, small- group discussions and lechires, will begin with a look at changing demographics in the Twin Cities, and then focus on such areas as education and employment, social service delivery, and finance. The cost of the seminar is $20 for stu- dents, $35 for nonstudents. For more information about the seminar, ca11641- The seminar will help local leaders 2284. page 8 LMC Cities Bulletin Transportation study board to solicit information from cities The Transportation Stndy Board has started their process for detemuning the long-term surface transportation needs in Minnesota. The board will involve state and local governments responsible for providing transportation facilities and services. Sometime in early November the board will ask each MnDOT District, county, municipality, and township in Minne- sota for its list ofneeds and priorities for the next 20 years. The board will mail each city a packet of survey forms. This effort is important to city govern- ment in Minnesota. Future funding for the City and County State Aid System will likely be based, in large part, on the board's recommendations. The deadline for the board to have its final report to the governor and the Legislature is Janu- ary 15,1991. Cities' needs must be within the board's recommendations. The board is emphasizing that cities' responses should be an accurate reflec- tion of long-term needs and not just a wish list." The board will ask each city council to pass a resolution document- ing that the needs in the city's response have been adopted by the council. This is important. The board is giving the cities an excellent opportunity to ex- press their needs and concerns. Do not let this chance get away. JJ Election officials offer views on consolidated local election proposal During the September mini session in Winona, city officials recounted views on consolidated local elections from a variety of perspectives for the members of the House Elections Division. Jim Pomeroy, Winona city clerk, said he supports the consolidated local election concept in Winona. He told of the good relationship on elections between the city and the local school district. He said the opportunity to vote on local issues is an advantage to city voters. He also noted that the city itself is located en- tirely within a single school district. Similar comments were offered by Carol Grimm, Rochester city clerk. Township and. school district officials testifying did not share the same out- look. They had concerns over require- ments to shift election dates, prospects for poor voter turnout, increased elec- tion costs, overlapping jurisdictional election districts, and increased likeli- hood of voter confusion. In addition, some officials spoke of the problems township governments would face in shifting the date of township annual meetings, adoption of the annual budget, and election of township officers includ- ing the position of township clerk. In recent years cities have been shiftingCityofficialsfromthemetropolitanarealocalelectionsintotheeven-numbered were anxious to address the House Elec- year to encourage greater voter turn-out October 6,1989 tions Division members during the Sep- tembermini session hearing. However, lawmakers said they only had an interest in hearing from local officials in the southeastern part of the state. The members said they would hear from city officials from other parts of the state at future mini sessions. (The mini session in Worthington is scheduled for October 18; the meeting in Moorhead is set for November 15.) Several officials from cities in Dakota County did get a chance to discuss con- cernsregarding changes in state election law that would mandate that all units of local government hold general elections only in November ofodd-numbered years. Officials were unanimous in support of provisions in the bill that would require cost sharing among jurisdictions to cover an increase in costs for city elections. They also said that state law does not address how to detemune such cost sharing and which level of government is au- thorized tomake final decisions regard- ing polling place locations, ballot for- mat, and a variety of other essential elements of pre- and post-election ad- ministration of consolidated local elec- tions. and to lower local election costs by re- ducingthe numberofelections theymust hold. The proposed legislation would create the prospect of increasing city election costs once again. Earlier, Secretary of State Joan Growe said that the proposed legislation would provide that the state must reimburse cities (and other units. of local govern- ment) for the cost of statewide and con- gressional elections. City officials agreed that such a requirement (for the state to pay its fair share ofthe local cost of state, legislative, and congressional elections) is essential. There is concern among local election officials about statutory requirements which fail to compel the state to compensate cities and counties fully for actual proportionate cost of statewide elections local election juris- dictions incur. The League has sent a request to local election officials in cities in the south- western part of the state to attend the October 18 meeting of the House Elec- tions Division in Worthington when a second hearing on the proposed legisla- tion (now drafted) will take place. A copy of the bill summary was enclosed with the League's request. If you are interested in testifying before the com- mittee, please contact Ann Higgins at the League as soon as possible. AH page 9 Federal Update Cities may submit policy amendments and resolutions on federal issues to NLC policy committee from Minnesota in addition to one LMC member on each of the five NLC Steering Committees. LMC delegation activities at NLC conference Although it is past the first deadline for NLC direct member cities and state leagues to submit policy proposals and resolutions for the NLC Congress of Cities, cities still can submit policies for consideration. The NLC Congress of Cities is November 25-29 in Atlanta. The LMC Federal Legislative Commit- tee is done with its policy development process. The committee will recommend adoption of new LMC federal policies on anti-drug abuse assistance, restruc- turing of federal surface transportation programs, and rural development issues. At the League's Policy Adoption Con- ferenceNovember 16, committee mem- bers will review NLC 1990 policy rec- ommendations and detemvne whether LMC needs to offer amendments or reso- lutions. In the meantime, LMC member cities, including the 48 cities which are direct members of the NLC, may offer sugges- tions for additional topics or amend- ments to current or proposed NLC pol- icy positions. Members of NLC policy. committees may offer amendments during policy committee meetings set for Sunday, November 26, at the Congress of Cities. There are usually five members on each National drug abuse efforts stymied for lack of new funding commitments In a letter LMC President Millie MacLeod sent to members of the Minnesota Con- gressional Delegation she expresses concern that the national drug strategy the Bush Administration is sponsoring would take more than $600 million from programs to assist state and local gov- ernment in anti-drug measures. Under the proposal nearly $200 million of that amount would go directly to states. This would deplete resources that had for- merlybeen directed to cities to aid in ef- forts tocombat the conditions that make drug problems more difficult to over- come--poverty,lack ofaffordable hous- ing,refugee resettlement and assistance, and economic and social problems. House and Senate congressional leaders are suggesting across-the-board reduc- tions in federal funding for city pro- grams to finance increased anti~lmg abuse assistance for state and local govern- ments. Cities need new funding to fight drug abuse. There is not much to gain by taking funds away from job training, housing, head start programs for young children, and other programs for youths at highest risk for drug abuse. City officials registered for the NLC Congress of Cities can look forward to a number of special activities. LMC will host a reception for Minneapolis Mayor Donald Fraser who is seeking NLC sec- ond vice president position. The recep- tion will be Sunday, November 26, from 5:00 to 6:30 p.m., just prior to the NLC welcoming reception. LMC will invite city officials and NLC leaders from cit- ies throughout the nation to attend. Those registered for the conference will re- ceive more details soon. The League will also sponsor a morning class" for Minnesota city officials on Tuesday, November 28, preceding the NLC conference program. Richard Campbell, who is on the faculty of the Vinson Insitute of Government at the University of Georgia, will discuss local government fiscal issues and implica- tions of growth on the stmcture of local government in Georgia. Campbell's informal presentation will offer plenty of chance for city officials to offer comments and observations about the status of state-local fiscal relations in Minnesota. City officials will receive more details soon. For more information on any of these topics, contact Ann Higgins at the League office 612/227-5600. AH r page 10 LMC Cities Bulletin Local government aid preliminary estimates for pay 1990 The following print-out, supplied by the House Research Depart- ment, provides estimates of Pay 90 LGA allocations including the LGA reductions caused by the transfer of city aid to school dis- tricts. This aid transfer will cause a reduction in each city's aid equal to the dollar value of 3.4 percent of the city's adjusted net tax ca- pacity. These LGA amounts are only estimates; final allocations will be determined by the Reve- nue Department and could differ from these estimates. Caution: In relying on these esti- mates, keep in mind the follow- ing: City levy limits will. automati- cally be adjusted for loss of LGA, so that. cities will be allowed to levy for their loss in LGA. Tax base equalization aid is provided in a manner different from Basic LGA. Equalization aid should NOT be taken into account by a city in setting its levy be- cause, unlike basic LGA, equali- zation aid is provided to the city after, not before, the city certifies its levy. The print-out does NOT include possible reductions in city home- stead and agricultural credit aid HACA). Cities which lose all of their LGA -may also lose some HACA relative to what would have been provided under the vetoed tax bill. Column description Column 1: Current 1969 LGA. This column indicates 1989 LGA allocations. Column 2: Basic LGA Before Education Reduction. This col- umn indicates the total 1990 LGA that would be provided render the basic LGA formula, before the 3.4 percentnet tax capacity reduction required in the new law. Column 3: Tax Base Equaliza- tion Aid. This column indicates the 1990 equalization aid, before the 3.4 percent net tax capacity reduction required by thenew law.. This aid does not affect the levy which the city must certify to the county .auditor and should not be taken into account in determining the city's certified levy. Column 4: Preliminary Total Aid. This column .indicates the total aid from basic LGA and equalization aid before the 3.4 percent net tax capacity reduc- tion. Column 5: Aid Reduction for Education. This column indicates the aid reduction caused by the aid transfer from cities to school dis- tricts. The reduction in each city's aid will be equal to the dollar value of 3.4 percent of the city's adjusted net tax capacity. If the aid reduction indicated in .column 5 equals the city's total LGA (indi- cated in column 4), then the city can expect to lose some additional amount in HACA relative to the HACA that would have been paid under the vetoed tax bill. The 3.4 percent net tax capacity reduction is structured to first reduce LGA, then equalization aid, then HACA. Column 6: Final LGA Amount. This column indicates the final LGA amount after the 3.4 percent net tax capacity reduction in each city's LGA. This amount is an estimate of what the department of revenue will certify to cities by October 23. However, this amount does not reflect the slight reduc- tion in each city's LGA for state administrative .costs. City levy limits .will automatically be ad- justed for loss of LGA, so that cities will be allowed to levy for their loss in LGA. Column 7: Final Equalization Aid. This column. indicates the final .tax base equalization aid amount after any needed reduc- tionfor the 3.4 percent aid transfer to schools. This aid does not affect the levy which the city must cer- tify to the county auditor and should not be taken. into account in deter- mining the city's certified levy. October 6,1989 Pl HOWSE RESEARCH DEPARTMENT 29 Sep 89 w CLUSTER REGION GROUP METRO CENTRAL CITIES GROUP TOTALS CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID & EQUALIZATION AID SPECIAL SESSION AID RUN: SSCT1b CITY LISTING PAGE: 1 BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EQUALIZTN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID AID FOR EDUC.AMOUNT EQ. AID CITY (1)2)3)4=(2+3)5)b)7) MPLS CITY OF 75068187 81817114 0 81817114.11932868 6988424?0 ST PAUL CITY 0 47029763 51757069 0 51757069 6347976 45409093 0 122097950 133574183 0 133574183 18280843 115293340 0 LARGE SUBURBS ANOKA CITY OF 1494022 1629648 13602 1643250 388088 1241560 13602 BROOKLYN CENTE 2661190 2953450 0 2953450 884733 2068717 0 COLUMBIA NEIGH 2332694 2533480 0 2533480 433352 2100128 0 COON RAPIDS CI 3191407 3561846 158450 3720296 993093 2568753 158450 CRYSTAL CITY 0 2232703 2445440 106491 2551931 504206 1941234 106491 FALCON HEIGHTS 274264 308973 11269 320243 109956 99018 1~_ 1269. FRIDLEY CITY 0 2384311 2640873 0 2640873 822000 1818873 0 HASTINGS CITY 1428704 1482017 207940 1689957 321615 1160402 207940 MOUND CITY OF 578786 659792 0 659792 259924 399868 0 MOUNDS VIED CI 821731 908570 30319 938889 270904 637666 30319 NEW BRIGHTON C 1257949 1420193 0 1420193 577264 842929 0 NEW HOPE CITY 1647911 1843623 0 1843623 634385 1209238 0 NORTN ST PAUL 903299 981762 32227 1013990 248368 733394 32227 RICHFIELD CITY 4042543 4438346 33062 4471407 839824 3598521 33062 ROBBINSDALE CI 1735962 1856630 136559 1993188 295977 1560652 136559 ROSEMOUNT CITY 607920 620078 52647 672726 193700 426379 52647 SOUTH ST PAUL 2667299 2871537 114095 2985632 449799 2421738 114095 SPRING LAKE PA 331155 374378 30031 404409 143086 231293 30031 ST ANTHONY CIT 394206 453337 0 453337 233429 219908 0 ST PAUL PARK C 524198 544805 49057 593862 100732 444074 49057 STILLUATER CIT 1249328 1300620 82649 1383270 358193 942428 82649 WEST ST PAUL C 1634230 1833910 0 1833910 564815 1269095 0 uHITE BEAR LK 1270980 1429810 38613 1468423 517562 912247 38613 GROUP TOTALS 35666792 39'093120 1097012 40190132 10145005 28948115 1097012 HI-VALUE SUBURBS ARDEN HILLS CI 109649 111842 0 111842 111842 0 0 BLOOMINGTON CI 2967617 3026969 0 3026969 3026969 0 0 CHANHASSEN CIT 333041 339702 0 339702 271133 68569 0 DEEPHAVEN CITY 128020 130580 0 130580 130580 0 0 DELLU00D CITY 34230 34915 0 34915 34915 0 0 EDINA CITY OF 561453 572682 0 572682 572682 0 0 GEM LAKE CITY 29 30 0 30 30 0 0 GOLDEN VALLEY 1406649 1434782 0 1434782 1013447 421335 0 GREENU000 CITY 24386 24874 0 24874 24874 0 0 HOPKINS CITY 0 1454515 1641226 0 1641226 576723 1064504 0 MAPLENOOD CITY 2044410 2184853 0 2184853 982630 1202222 0 MEDINA CITY OF 120256 122661 0 122661 122661 0 0 P2 LMC Cities Bulletin HOUSE RESEARCH DEPARTMENT 29 Sep 89 w * * w • CLUSTER REGION .GROUP METRO HI-VALUE SUBURBS CITY LISTING CITT LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID & EQUALIZATION AID PAGE: 2 SPECIAL SESSION AID RUN: SSCT1b BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EQUALIZTN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID AID FOR EDUC.AMOUNT EQ. AID CITY (1) (2) (3)4=(2+3)5)6) (7) MENDOTA HEIGHT-232754 237409 0 237409 237409 0 0 MINNETONKA BEA 43124 43986 0 43986 43986 0 0 MINNETONKA CIT 1651407 1684435 0 1k84435 1684435 0 0 MINNETRISTA C!201991 206031 0 206031 160885 45146 0 NORTH OAKS CIT.4839 4936 0 4936 4936 0 0 OAK PARK REIGN 101649 103682 0 103682 103682 0 0 ORONO CITY OF 168429 171798 0 171798 171798 0 0 ROSEVILLE CITY 1376201 1582631 0 1582631 1308134 274497 0 SHAKOPEE CITY 638661 651434 0 651434 401043 250391 0 SNOREW000 CITY 163511 166781 0 166781 166781 0 0 SPRING PARK CI 75326 76833 0 76833 71409 5424 0 ST LOUIS PARK 3574492 4110666 0 4110666 1633458 2477207 0 SUNFISH LAKE C 6419 6547 0 6547 6547 0 0 TONKA BAT CITY 53073 54134 0 54134 54134 0 0 WAY2ATA CITY 0 152734 155789 0 155789 155789 0 0 WOODLAND CITY 2863 2920 0 2920 2920 0 0 GROUP TOTALS 17631728 18885128 0 18885128 13075834 5809294 0 HI-GROWTH AREAS ANDOVER CITY 0 350471 403042 52571 455612 261030 142012 52571 APPLE VALLEY C 1334606.1524637 122348 1646985 801768 722870 122348 BLAINE CITY OF 1758232 1998042 154097 2152139 738956 1259086 154097 BROOKLYN PARK 3019554 3472487 0 3472487 1483347 1989140 0 BURNSVItLE CIT 2610087 2662289 0 2662289 1823196 839093 0 CHAMPLIN CITY 689316 792713 99775 892489 291128 501585 99775 CHASKA CITY OF 496875 558138 22358 580496 224910 333228 22358 CORCORAN CITY 136719 141081 20508 161588 103122 37958 20508 COTTAGE GROVE 1474862 1551904 221229 1773133 508690 1043214 221229 EAGAN CITY OF 1007957 1028116 0 1028116 1028116 0 0 EAST BETHEL CI 221070 248488 32220 280708 146243 102245 32220 EDEN PRAIRIE C 331167 337790 0 337790 337790 0 0 ELKO CITY OF 9092 9274 1364 10638 5746 3528 1364 FOREST LAKE CI 512820 547226 0 547226 148008 399218 0 HAM LAKE CITY 307985 349286 44222 393507 173221 176064 44222 HUGO CITY OF 149277 152263 22392 174654 103245 49018 22392 INVER GROVE HT 1020925 1174064 0 1174064 564622 609441 0 LAKE ELMO CITY 179562 183153 26934 210088 160967 22186 26934 LAKELAND SHORE 495 505 0 505 505 0 0 LAKEViLLE CITY 949098 1069582 47766 1117348 525076 544506 47766 LILYDALE CITY 623 635 0 635 635 0 0 L1N0 LAKES CIT 331225 360787 49684 410470 144383 216404 49684 LITTLE CANADA 366619 421612 0 421612 261114 160498 0 MAPLE GROVE CI 1124102 1292717 140952 1433669 861395 431323 140952 October 6,1989 P3 NOOSE RESEARCH DEPARTMENT 29 Sep 89 CLUSTER REGION GROUP METRO HI-GROWTH AREAS GROUP TOTALS CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID & EQUALIZATION AID SPECIAL SESSION AID RUN: SSCT1b CITY LISTING PAGE: 3 BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EOUALIZTN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID AiD FOR EDUC. AMOUNT ED. AID CITY (1) (2)3)4=(2+3)5) (6) (7) OAKDALE CITY 0 957576 1093394 64581 1157975 362927 730467 64581 PINE SPRINGS C 529 540.0 540 540 0 0 PLYMOUTH CITY 838786 855562 0 855562 855562 0 0 PRIOR LAKE ClT 433631 459401 19996 479396 297658 161743 19996 RAMSEY CITY OF 446665 513665 67000 580665 202796 310869 67000 SHOREVIEW CITY 712962 819906 0 819906 683851 136055 0 VADNAIS HEIGHT 246122 283040 0 283040 258193 24848 0 4100DBURY CITY 789162 804945 0 804945 589385 215560 0 22808172 25110282 1209996 26320278 13448123 11162158 1209996 SMALL CITIES AFTON CITY OF 67453 68802 0 68802 68802.0 0 BAYPORT CITY 0 169184 172568 0 172568 101836 70731 0 BELLE PIAINE C 314560 323992 46919 370911 65526 258467 46919 BETHEL CITY OF 20666 21387 3100 24486 5080 16306 3100 BIRCNNOOD CITY 38386 39154 0 39154 35032 4122 0 CARVER CITY OF 37899 39825 5685 45510 11853 27972 5685 CENTERVILIE CI 37943 40370 5691 46062 21784 18586 5691 CIRCLE PINES C 325061 346480 48759 395239 88944 257536 48759 COATES CITY OF 3272 3337 491 3828 3337 0 0 COLOGNE CITY 0 41780 43228 6267 49495 11264 31964 6267 EXCELSIOR CITY 247573 273643 0 273643 91611 182032 0 FARMINGTON CIT 447015 461750 67052 528802 104781 356969 67052 GREENFiELD CIT 31946 32585 4792 37377 325$5 0 3748 HAMBURG CITY 0 40108 41642 6016 47658 7553 34089 6016 HAMPTON CITY 0 19471 19860 2921 22181 6623 13237 2921 HILLTOP CITY 0 72731 79810 0 79810 18857 60953 0 INDEPENDENCE C 69724 71118 7549 78667 71118 0 2175 JORDAN CITY OF 294721 304186 44208 348394 56285 247901 44208 LAKE ST CROIX 28349 32601 4252 36854 21741 10860 4252 LAKELAND CITY 32911 33569 4937 38506 33569 0 0 LANDFALL CITY 31528 32159 0 32159 24360 7798 0 LAUDERDALE CIT 93210 107192 542 107733 57763 49429 542 LEXINGTON CITY 161822 176417 9977 186393 44533 131884 9977 LONG LAKE CITY 147194 150138 0 150138 64273 85865 0 LORETTO CITY 0 30490 31100 955 32055 9502 21597 955 MANTOMEDI CITY 305889 312007 13697 325704 125402 186605 13697 MAPLE PLAIN CI 101009 103029 15151 118181 44628 58401 15151 MARINE-ON-STCR 21406 21834 0 21834 20770 1064 0 MAYER CITY OF 29503 30395 4425 34820 5882 24512 4425 MEDICINE LAKE 5693 5807 0 5807 5807 0 0 MENDOTA CITY 0 12186 12430 1828 14258 5906 6524 1828 MIESVILLE CITY 2791 2847 419 3265 2847 0 0 P4 LMC Cities Bulletin HOUSE RESEARCH * CITY LISTINGDEPARTMENT 29 Sep 89 *CITY IOCAI GOVERNMENT AID 3 EQUALIZATION AID SPECIAL SESSION AI D RUN: SSCT1b PAGE: 4 r:+r ,r •: r r * •,r ,r ,t BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EQUALI2TN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINALCLUSTER1989LGAED. REOUC AIO AID FOR EOUC.AMOUNT EQ, AIDREGIONGROUPCITY1)2)3)4*(2+3)5)6)7) METRO SMALL CITIES- NEY GERMANY CI 20366 21361 305S 24416 5388 15974 3055 NEY MARKET CIT 13243 14102 198 16088 5373 8728 1986NEWTRIERCITY32473312487379919801332487 NEYPORT CITY 0 323497 329967 0 329967 107562 222405 0 IIORY000 CITY 0 93807 98043 14071 112114 23286 74757 14071 OSSEO CITY OF 162000 165240 0 165240 83999 81241 p RANOOLPN CITY 12931 13190 1940 15129 6392 6797 1940 ROGERS CITY OF 32565 33216 0 33216 29303 3913 0 SAVAGE CITY OF 322626 371020 0 371020 229987 141033 0 ST BONIFACIUS 37514 38264 5627 43891 23615-14649 5627 ST FRANCIS CIT 79398 90052 10218 100263 39141.50911 10212 ST MARYS POINT 4797 4893 0 4893 4893 0 0 VERMILLION CIT 11839 12076 1776 13852 9556 2519 1776 VICTORIA CITY 65571 66882 0 66882 66802 81 0 WACONIA CITY 0 327903 342166 49189 391351 65561 276605 49185 YATERTOGAI C17Y 183251 199327 16378 21.5705 34485 164842 1637841ILLERNIECITY478594985571795703412749371067179YOUNGAMERICA9927710239314892117285215158087814892 GROUP TOTALS 5125165 5390618 432421 5823039 2041443.3349175 420157 REGION TOTALS ~203329807 222053331 2739429 224792760 57491248 164562083 2727166 October 6,1989 P5t HOUSE RESEARCH * * CITY LISTING DEPARTMENT 29 Sep 89 * .CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID & EQUALIZATION AID * PAGE: 5 SPECIAL SESSION AID RUN: SSCT1b BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM. AID CURRENT BEFORE EQUALI2TN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL CLUSTER 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID AID FOR EDUC. AMOUNT EQ. AID REGION GROUP CITY (1) (2) (3) 4=(2+3) (5) (6) (7) NON-MET MAJOR CITIES DULUTH CITY OF 14769019 16017569. 0 16017569 901479 15116089 0 MANKATO CITY 0 4839856 5103506 580052 5683557 504748 4598757._ 580052 s MOORHEAD CITY 4094507 4388517 275711 4664229 374155 4014362 275711 ROCHESTER CITY 7232702 8060306 0 8060306 1668983 6391324 0 ST CLOUD CITY 6652566 7039240 312920 7352160 1007955 6031285 312920 GROUP TOTALS 37588650 40609138 1168683 41777821 4457321 36151817 1168683 REGIONAL CENTERS ALBERT LEA CIT 3638933 3884057 301247 4185304 218643 3665414 301247 ALEXANDRIA CIT 1257831 1353777 29889 1383666 173376 1180401 29889 AUSTIN CITY OF 3929497 4242453 338149 4580601 314879 3927574 338149 BEMIDJI CITY 0 2194554 2324248 56874 2381122 172169 2152079 56874 BRAINERD CITY 1884172 2033967 129698 2163665 185317 1848651 129698 CAMBRIDGE CITY 378074 416808 0 416808 85729 331079 0 CLOQUET CITY 0 1950992 2031508 179532 2211040 179756 1851752 179532 CROOKSTON CITY 1575799 1650166 236370 1886536 79830 1570337 236370 DETROIT LAKES 1171339 1256101 59100 1315200 117896 1138205 59100 EAST GRAND FOR 1365292 1446833 204794 1651627 104357 1342476 204794 FAIRMONT CITY 1911542 2048548 253376 2301924 128076 1920473 253376 FARIBAULT CITY 3162446 3346240 257059 3603299 213625 3132615 257059 FERGUS FALLS C 2510433 2680548 124533 2805081 196609 2483939 124533 GlENCOE CITY 0 610303 65133 1 91545 742877 58278 53053 91545 HERMANTOWN CIT 467232 521100 59177 580277 118232 402869 59177 HUTCHINSON CIT 1320770 1410739 198116 1608855 166991 1243748 198116 INTL FALLS CIT 1370604 1427982 177380 1605362 87815 1340166 177380 LESUEUR CITY 0 581528 622332 34264 656596 58654 563678 34264 LITCHFIELO CIT 885205 958871 77231 1036101 81929 876942 77231 LITTLE FALLS C 1429005 1507407 113166 1620573 88715 1418692 113166 MARSHALL CITY 1354402 1474739 149175 1623914 181087 1293652 149175 MONTEVIDEO CIT 882191 954911 94326 1049237 59504 895407 94326 MORA CITY OF 420546 449433 9610 459043 48073 401359 9610 MORRIS CITY OF 844026 884740 126604 1011344 49019 835721 126604 NEW PRAGUE CIT 444850 473250 66728 539977 56197 417052 66728 NEW ULM CITY 0 2277630 2425831 250729 2676560 176889 2248942 250729 NORTH MANKATO 1438895 1542122 166158 1708280 157294 1384828 166158 NORTHFIELD CIT 1379965 1461670 206995 1668664 186576 1275094 206995 OWATONNA CITY 2684471 2891666 274023 3165689 342975 2548691 274023 PARK RAPIDS CI 463346 494606 14290 508896 47620 446986 14290 PIPESTONE CITY 676730 729181 68987 798168 39918 689262 68987 PRINCETON CITY 324333 359423 46828 406251 55602 303822 46828 RED WING CITY 1154277 1177363 0 1177363 948912 228451 0 REDWOOD FALLS 826411 889253 123962 1013214 55568 833685 123962 SAUK RAPIDS CI 935236 997172 87015 1084187 87875 909297 87015 ST PETER CITY 998221 1071844 149733 1221577 81293 990551 149733 THIEF RIVER FA 960765 1059296 144115 1203411 86687 972609 144115 P6 LMC Cities Bulletin HOUSE RESEARCH * * CITY LISTING DEPARTMENT 29 Sep 89 * CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID & EOUALIZATiON AID * PAGE: 6 SPECIAL SESSION A1D RUN: SSCT1b BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM. A[D CURRENT BEFORE EGUALi2TN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL CLUSTER 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AiD AIO FOR EDUC. AMOUNT E0. AID REGION GROUP CITY (1) (2) (;) 4s(2+3) (5) (6) (7) NON-MET REW ONAI CENTERS WADENA CITY OF 503643 546216 -46352 592569 53827 492389 46352 WAITE-PARK CIT 460490 510583 0 510583 125986 384597 0 WASECA CITY OF 1337180 1432431 107531 1539962 120027 1312404 107531 WiLLMAR CITY 0 2266342 2436700 160607 2597307 263765 2172935 160607 WINDOM CITY OF 565416 607532 84812 692344 44242 563290 84812 WINONA CITY OF 4358764 4569864 512993 5082857 376092 4193772 512993 WORTHINGTON CI 1652244 1741774 247837 1989611 139282 1602492 247837 GROUP TOTALS 62805925 66996614 6060909 73057523 6615183 .60381431 6060909 i• TACONITE AREAS AITKIN CITY OF 273300 291746 8600 300346 45989 245757 8600 AURORA .CITY OF 292870 305031 43931 348962 13461 291571 43931 BABBITT CITY 0 92830 102222 13925 116146 11708 90514 13925 BIGFORK CITY 0 68666 72383 9556 81939 3938 68445 9556 BIYABIK CITY 0 209435 215312 31415 246727 5689 209623 31415 BOVEY CITY OF 212862 217119 26916 244035 3312 213808 26916 BUNL CITY OF 266427 271756 23668 295424 4986 266770 23668 CHISHOLM:CITY 1099451 1132763 146971 1279734 34368 1098395 146971 COLERAINE CITY 242234 247681 36335 284017 8977 238704 36335 COOK CITY OF 27307 31403 4096 35499 5692 25711 4096 CROSBY CITY OF 292552 318632 43883 362514 20107 298525 43883 CR~SLAKE CITY 8391 8559 0 8559 8559 0 0 DEER RIVER CIT 132401 135990 19860 155850 7542 128449 19860 DEERW000 CITY 67435 73241 10115 83356 9030 64211 10115 ElY CITY OF 682418 715985 72513 788499 24644 691342 72513 EMILY CITY OF 28946 33288 0 33288 20578 12710 0 EVELETH CITY 0 786674 829706 111575 941281 35014 794692 111575 FLOODWOOD CITY 87064 90125 13060 103185 3710 86415 13060 GILBERT CITY 0 452606 463125 59716 522841 11950 451175 59716 GRAND MARAIS C 219977 230237 32997 263233 22035 208202 32997 GRAND RAPIDS C 1321456 1393114 74731 1467845 181663 1211451 74731 HIBBING CITY 0 3116379 3340150 289059 3629210 191591 3148560 289059 HOYT LAKES CIT 276879 284972 41532 326504 48249 236724 41532 IRONTON CITY 0 90663 93693 13599 107292 4732 88961 13599 KEEWATIN CITY 275226 282848 34719 317567 5374 277474 34719 LAPRAIRIE CITY 41402 43231 6210 49442 8080 35151 6210 MARBLE CITY OF 172336 175783 22911 198693 3058 172725 22911 MT IRON CITY 0 206258 237197 30939 268135 48822 188375 30939 NASHWAUK CITY 323107 329569 41868 371438 5519 324050 41868 SILVER BAY CIT 220738 239018 33111 272129 16087 222931 33111 TOWER CITY OF 73109 75902 10413 86315 3516 72386 10413 TWO HARBORS CI 746231 780326 7$942 859267 30668 749657 78942 VIRGINIA CITY 2057746 2122709 308662 2431371 104703 2018006 308662 October 6,1989 P7 HOUSE RESEARCH DEPARTMENT 29 Sep 89 CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID & EQUALIZATION AID SPECIAL SESSION AID RUN: SSCT1b CITY LISTING PAGE: 7 w * * * * w BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEF~tE EQUALI2TN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL CLUSTER 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID AID FOR EDUC.AMOUNT EQ. AID REGION GROUP CITY (1)2)3)4=(2+3)5)b)7) GROUP TOTALS 14465376 15184817 1695828 16880644 953348 14231468 1695828 NON-MET SUB-REG. CENTERS ANNANDALE CITY 199992 214975 29999 244973 20922 194053 29999 APPLETON CITY 299661 321437 44949 366386 13341 308046 44949 BAGLEY CITY OF 241363 255325 11404 266730 13166 242159 11404 BAUDETTE CITY 183434 196313 19262 215575 13012 183301 19262 BENSON CITY OF 726823 768191 54899 823090 22955 745236 54899 BLACKDUCK CITY 93419 96588 14013 110600 6838 89749 14013 BLOOMING PRAIR 246435 264477 36965 301443 19352 245126 36965 BLUE EARTH CIT 557062 591074 83559 674633 47806 543268 83559 BRECKENRIDGE C 907421 959124 64548 1023672 29878 929245 64548 BREWSTER CITY 30600 34156 4590 38746 3720 30436 4590 BROWERVILLE CI 77460 84662 6686 91348 6981 77681 6686 BUFFALO LAKE C 88968 95800 13345 109145 9420 86380 13345 CANBY CITY OF 348113 373150 49143 422292 18994 354156 49143 CANNON FALLS C 380028 396696 50486 447183 65398 331298 50486 CASS LAKE CITY 271338 276765 17702 294467 6940 269825 17702 CLARKFIELD CIT 178624 184148 26794 210941 8932 175215 26794 COKATO CITY OF 265413 284722 30078 314800 25942 258780 30078 COLD SPRING CI 255128 264088 38269 302357 33960 230128 38269 COTTONWOOD CIT 136112 144049 20417 164466 11488 132561 20417 DAWSON CITY OF 246705 263841 37006 300847 20740 243101 37006 DODGE CENTER C 239019 249191 35853 285044 22620 226571 35853 ELBOW LAKE C[T 218709 235185 29490 264676 10441 224745 29490 ELMORE CITY OF 102527 108965 15379 124344 4666 104299 15379 FOLEY CITY OF 249538 265241 23122 288364 18300 246942 23122 FOSSTON CITY 0 241158 258083 36174 294257 12271 245812 36174 FRA2EE CITY OF 118819 127481 14152 141634 9254 118227 14152 GLENWOOD CITY 402433 417720 60365 478084 30712 387008 60365 GOODHUE CITY 0 74354 78875 11153 90028 8238 70637 11153 GRANITE FALLS 519874 553454 26598 580052 23851 529603 26598 GREENBUSH CITY 134043 139527 10485 150012 5293.134233 10485 HARMONY CITY 0 172997 181057 25950 207006 9411 171646 25950 HAYFIELD CITY 132117 138869 19818 158687 14552 124317 19818 HECTOR CITY OF 156760 166123 23514 189637 13231 152892 23514 HERMAN CITY OF 103449 108201 15517 123718 4001 104200 15517 HINCKLEY CITY 136784 143488 13077 156565 20282 123206.13077 HOWARD LAKE CI 146858 161955 16141 178095 19168 142786 1614 1 JASPER CITY OF 103830 110121 4456 114577 4861 105260 4456 KARLSTAD CITY 115182 121293 17277 138570 7297 113995 17277 KENYON CITY OF 190712 204571 28607 233177 18725 185846 28607 LAKE CITY CITY 653210 706228 58554 764781 73607 632621 58554 LEWISTON CITY 101592 112051 15239 127290 17103 94948 15239 LONG DRAIRIE C 512463 541756 23646 565402 27624 514132 23646 pg LMC Cities Bulletin NOOSE RESEARCH *CITY LISTING DEPARTMENT 29 Sep 89 * CIT Y LOCAL GOVERNMENT'AiD & EOUALI7ATION AID PAGE: 8 SPECIAL SESSION AID RUN: SSCT1b w * * * * * * BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EGUALt2TN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL CLUSTER 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID AID FOR EDUC.AMOUNT Ea. AID REGION CROUP CITY 1)2)3)4=(2+3)5)6)7) NON-MET SUB-REG. CENTERS LUVERNE CITY 0 851416 905651 68310 973961 36924 868728 68310 MADISON CITY 0 354457 373484 53169 426652 15817 357666 53169 MELROSE CITY 0 476442 492101 40120 532221 37473 454628 40120 NtLACA CITY OF 330863 356211 18588 374799 28555 327656 18588 MOOSE LAKE CIT 131934 145467 19790 165258 13383 132084 19790 NT LAKE CITY 0 309160 337875 44417.382292 18003 319871 44417 NEW YORK MILLS 199698 205168 29955 235123 9276 195893 29955 OLIVIA CITY OF 491023 522689 59107 581796 26730 495960 591.07 PAYNESVILLE CI 231479 251414 34722 286136 24386 227028 34722 PELICAN RAPIDS 206624 223120 18069 241188 22610 200509 18069 PEOUOT LAKES C 86523 95221 4211 99432 16998 78223 4211 PERNAM CITY OF 226963 246809 22009 268818 35148 211661 22009 PIERZ CITY OF 71711 78205 10575 88780 10379 67826 10575 PINE CITY C[TY 348098 379340 18357 397697 45520 333820 18357 PINE ISLAND CI 201517 211596 30228 241823 24838 186758 30228 PINE RIVER CIT 131874 138384 14526 152910 12101 126282 14526 PLAINVIEW CITY 313466 336271 47020 383291 30063 306209 47020 PRESTON CITY 0 227410 232552 34112 266663 12095 220457 34112 REO LAKE FALLS 257393 265024 38609 303633 10229 254794 38609 RICE C(TY OF 23123 25810 3468 29278 11237 14573 3468 ROSEAU CITY Of 230787 257254 34618 291872 32344 224910 34618 ROUND LAKtc CIT 26893 30927 4034 34961 4806 26121 4034 RUSH CITY CITY 191167 205038 12875 217913 24344 180694 12875 RUSHfORD CITY 150758 165327 22614 187940 15213 150114 22614 SAUK CENTRE CI 691360 728298 63945 792243 41687 686610 63945 SLAYTON CITY 0 432012 453240 64802 518042 1$269 434971 64802 SLEEPY EYE CIT 708612 740637 73779 814417 33353 707284 73779 SPRINGFIELD. CI 311316 333546 46697 380244 19842 313704 46697 ST JAMES CITY 690032 737356 67171 804526 41145 696210 67171 STAPLES CITY 0 573409 601750 47957 649706 18979 582771 47957 TRACY CITY OF 437595 459276 65639 524915 17234 442042 65639 TYLER CITY OF 135179 148447 20277 168723 8784 139663 20277 WABASHA CITY 0 379013 391470 56852 448322 29907 361563 56852 WALKER CITY OF 180756 185328 24241 209569 20305 165023 24241 WANAMINGO CITY 107552 111548 16133 127681 10313 101236 16133 WARREN CI1Y OF 213689 228705 16318 245023 11898 216807 16318 WARROAD CITY 0 116577 126639 0 126639 40271 86368 0 WATKINS CITY 0 76332 80930 11450 92380 8395 72536 11450 WELLS CITY OF 540135 567353 48145 615497 24650 542702 48145 WINNEBAGO CITY 233647 247062 35047 282109 16369 230693 35047 WINSTED CITY 0 253297 260834 37994 298828 19985.240849 37994 2UMBROTA CITY 347250 363299 52088 415386 34692 328606 52088 GROUP TOTALS 23059563 24445669 2610716 27056384 1709841 X273582$51G7"!b October. 6, 1989 P9 HOUSE RESEARCH *CITY LISTING DEPARTMENT * 29 Sep 89 *CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID EQUALIZATION AID PAGE: 9 SPECIAL SESSION AID RUN: SSCT1b BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EQUALIZTN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL CLUSTER 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID AID FOR EDUC.AMOUNT EQ. AID REG10N GROUP CITY 1)2)3)4=(2+3)5)6)7) NON-MET URBAN FRINGE BAXTER CITY OF 174603 200793 16441 217235 71081 129713 16441 BECKER CITY OF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BIG LAKE CITY 249760 277237 37464 314701 39013 238224 37464 BRANAN CITY OF 190658 201745 8863 210608 12004 189741 8863 BRANCH CITY OF 51797 59567 7770 67336 35696 23871 7770 BUFFALO CITY 0 518772 569984 77816 647799 74066 495918 77816 BYRON CITY OF 174472 188063 26171 214234 22889 165174 26171 CHISAGO CITY C 224476 239314 33671 272985 35200 204114 33671 CLARKS GROVE C 59697 64249 8935 73184 4670 59579 8935 CLEVELAND CITY 47947 53998 7192 61190 5462 48537 7192 DAYTON CITY OF 136302 156747 20445 177193 84189 72558 20445 DELANO CITY OF 370576 3936%33205 426902 40798 352898 33205 DILNORTH CITY 393723 419107 43674 462781 19617 399490 43674 EAGLE LAKE CIT 106293 116904 15944 132848 11525 105379 15944 EAST GULL LAKE.4348 4435 0 4435 4435 0 0 ELK RIVER CITY 445148 511920 66772 578692 198233 313687 66772 EYOTA CITY OF 82618 94324 12393 106716 13943 80381 12393 GLYNDON CITY 0 79210 834%11882 95378 6472 77025 118$2 GOODVIEW CITY 200433 219152 30065 249217 45940 173212 30065 HANOVER CITY 0 26483 30455 3972 34428 12983 17472 3972 ISANTI CITY OF 206035 210156 19625 229780 16483 193673 19625 KASSON clTr of 309587 332369 46438 378807 31125 301244 46438 LACRESCENT CIT 256969 291011 38545 329556 38292 252720 38545 LAKE SHORE CIT 9093 9275 0 9275 9275 0 0 LINDSTROM CITY 166220 188151 12468 200619 45404 142742 12468 LONSDALE CITY 67263 77352 10089 87442 12910 64442 10089 MANTORVILLE CI 107252 110340 16088 126427 7535 102804 16088 MAZEPPA CITY 0 57624 63646 8644 72289 6024 57622 8644 MONTiCELLO CIT 181210 184834 0 184834 184834 0 0 MONTROSE CITY 64710 73496 9707 83203 10882 62615 9707 NISSWA CITY OF 13017 13277 0 13277 13277 0 0 NORTH BRANCH C 177553 194314 16901 211215 28785 165529 16901 ROCKFORD CITY 259228 284072 37663 321735 31774 252299 37663 ROCKVILLE CITY 28460 32578 4269 36847 6396 26182 4269 SARTELL CITY 0 326991 355458 0 355458 118358 237100 0 SOUTH INTL FAL 335630 SPICER CITY OF 84457 93611 12669 106280 19688 73923 12669 ST CLAIR CITY 55410 60188 8312 68500 4728 55461 8312 ST JOSEPH CITY 361049 373575 39116 412691 22452 351123 39116 ST MICHAEL CIT 128449 142833 19267 162100 28346 114487 19267 STACY CITY OF 41885 46483 6283 52766 11936 34547 6283 STENARTVILLE C 503091 537964 65717 603681 41302 496661 65717 STOCKTON CITY 14401 16426 2160 18586 4184 12242 2160 41YOMING CITY 0 130690 146370 10777 157147 42891 103479 10777 P10 LMC Cities Bulletin HOUSE RESEARCH * DEPARTMENT 29 Sep 89 s,t*•,r•f i• i• CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID ~ EQUALIZATION AID SPECIAL SESSION AiD RUN: SSCT1b CITY LISTING PAGE: 10 w * * • • * w BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EQUALIZTN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL CLUSTER 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID AID FOR EDUC.AMOUNT EQ. AID REGION GROUP CITY (1)2)3)4=(2;3)5)6)7) NON-MET URBAN FRINGE ZIMMERMAN CITY 71880 78134 10782 88916 15240 62894 10782 GROUP TOTALS 7495470 7801100 858194 8659294 1490339.6310761 858194 MOD.SIZE CITIES ADA CITY OF 337301 356801 50595 4073%16253 340548 50595 ADAMS CITY OF 102584 109862 12664 122525 6010 103852 12664 ADRIAN CITY OF 160309 172068 24046 1%115 6546 165523 24046 AKELEY CITY OF 56661 59049 890 59939 4013 55036 890 ALBANY CITY OF 189712 202239 28457 230695 22426 179813 28457 ALBERriILLE CI b15%65465 9239 74704 15297 50168 9239 ALDEN CITY OF 93435 98780 14015 112795 5397 93384 14015 AMBOY CITY OF 68451 72790 10268 83058 4461 68330 10268 ARGYLE CITY OF 123388 128570 15709 144279 6057 122512 15709 ARLINGTON CITY 220037 240563 33006 273568 16010 224553 33006 ATWTER CITY 0 148464 156872 22270 179142 10957 145915 22270 AVON CITY OF 84145 89288 12622 101910 16545 72742 12622 BALATON CITY 0 98303 103786 14745 118531 4653 99133 14745 BARNESVIILE CI 169554 185891 25433 211325 13987 171904 25433 BATTLE LAKE CI 91254 99685 117'9'6 111481 10437 89248 117'96 BELGRADE CITY 87628 112 13144 109256 7139 88974 13144 BERTHA CITY OF 123300 127543 9509 137052 3446 124097 9509 BIG FALLS CITY 48244 51283 3769 55051 2216 49067 3769 BIRD ISLAND CI 159274 169527 23891 193418 8659 160868 23891 BRANDON CITY 0 46050 500%6908 57004 3664 46433 6908 BROOTEN CITY 0 95144 101410 10329 111738 4766 96644 10329 BROWIS VALLEY 178233 183245 26735 209980 4335 178910 26735 BROWNSDALE CIT 64999 70556 8218 78774 6393 64163 8218 BRO{AITON CITY 101184 1042%15178 119474 4947 99349 15178 BUTTERFIELD CI 71813 76104 10772 86876 3407 72697 10772 CALEDONIA CITY 391850 420902 42246 463148 22830 398072 42246 CARLTON CITY 0 93842 98743 14076 112819 7931 90812 14076 CEYLON CITY OF 47544 49851 7132 56983 2103 47748 7132 CHATFiELD CITY 264810 285610 39265 324875 23307 262303 39265 CHOKIO CITY OF 79703 85285 11812 97097 3404 81881 11812 CIARA CITY CIT 169802 186439 25470 211910 13662 172778 25470 CIAREMONT CITY 54544 57176 8182 65358 3815 53361 8182 CIARISSA CITY 121637 125980 15248 141227 3312 122668 15248 CLEARBROOK CIT 89277 94856 3155 98012 3771 91086 3155 CLINTON CITY 0 109382 113654 16407 130061 3493 110160 16407 CONFREY CITY 0 92818 95918 13923 109841 3594 92325 13923 COSMOS CITY OF 79027 81829 11854 93683 4268 77561 11854 DANUBE. CITY OF 73346 76310 11002 87312 4730 71580 11002 OASSEL CITY OF 146261 151094 21939 173033 12885 138210 21939 October 6,1989 P11 HOUSE RESEARCH *CITY LISTING DEPARTMENT * 29 Sep 89 *CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID EWALIZATION AID PAGE: 11 SPECIAL SESSION A1D RUN: SSCT1b w BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EOUALI2TN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL CLUSTER 1989 LGA ED. REDUC A1D AID FOR EDUC.AMWNT Ea. AID REGION GROUP CITY 1)2)3)4=(2+3)5)6)7) NON-MET MOD.SI2E CITIES EAGLE BEND CIT 101410 105594 15212 120806 3354 102240 15212 EDEN VALLEY CI 122402 128197 17155 145352 7685 120513 17155 EDGERTON CITY 100379 112283 15057 127340 6930 105353 15057 ELGIN CITY OF 64796 69849 9719 79569 7073 62776 9719 ELLENDALE CITY 67956 71960 7360 79319 4756 67204 7360 ELLSWORTH CITY 80150 83728 12023 95751 3280 80448 12023 ERSKINE CITY 0 44523 49622 6678 56301 3670 45952 6678 EVANSVILLE CIT 81580 86960 6549 93509 4626 82333 6549 FAIRFAX CITY 0 178454 193471 26768 220239 1.1418 182053 26768 FERTILE CITY 0 84648 93969 12697 106666 5862 88107 12697 FREEPORT CITY 49224 51642 7384 59026 6377 45266 7384 FULDA CITY OF 192134 204754 28820 233574 7240 197514 28820 GAYLORD CITY 0 295319 309541 44298 353839 19073 290467 44298 GIBBON CITY OF 97877 104977 14682 119659 6028 98949 14682 GLENVILLE CITY 51177 56574 7677 64251 5911 50663 7677 GOOD THUNDER C 49359 51916 7404 59320 2953 48963 7404 GRACEVILLE CIT 111685 118800 14328 133128 4403 114397 14328 GRAND MEADOY C 108981 117284 16347 133631 6711 110574 16347 GROVE CITY CIT 96100 99842 14415 114257 3510 96331.14415 HALLOCK CITY 0 233162 245505 33547 279052 11340 234165 33547 HALSTAD CITY 0 81591 86994 12239 99232 5244 81749 12239 HANCOCK CITY 0 70107 78123 10516 88639 4270 73853 10516 HARRIS CITY OF 29406 33204 4411 37615 11304 21900 4411 NAYLEY CITY OF 142296 154095 18941 173036 13677 140419 18941 HENDERSON CITY 120607 125668 18091 143759 4095 121573 18091 HENORICKS CITY 117498 125873 11890 137763 5314 120559 11890 HENNING CITY 0 120949 129995 13879 143874 6694 123301 13879 HERON LAKE CIT 110495 118249 16574 134823 4947 113302 16574 HILLS CITY OF 76728 82253 7984 90237 4407 77846 7984 HOFFMAN CITY 0 70925 76500 9500 86000 5501 70999 9500 HOKAH CITY OF 121938 126309 15403 141712 4381 121928 15403 NOLDINGFORD CI 92487 95268 13873 109141 5061 90207 13873 HOUSTON CITY 0 154450 165689 15926 181615 8379 157310 15926 ISLE CITY OF 76055 81901 1087 82988 11152 70749 1087 IVANHOE CITY 0 114553 121625 13966 135591 5224 116401 13966 JACKSON CITY 0 692552 741633 103874 845506 28290 713342 103874 JANESVILLE CIT 211880 229376 31782 261158 14060 215316 31782 KASOTA CITY OF 49381 52728 4020 56748 4779 47949 4020 KERKHOVEN CITY 100686 108058 11743 119800 4923 103135 11743 KIESTER CITY 0 103476 108670 15521 124191 5044 103626 15521 KIMBALL CITY 0 39129 43255 5869 49124 7600 35655 5869 LAFAYETTE CITY 71847 74629 10777 85406 4847 69782 10777 LAKE BENTON CI 139727 145422 20959 166381 5069 140352 20959 LAKE CRYSTAL C 213672 236549 32051 268600 17190 219359 32051 LAKE PARK CITY.81148 88416 12172 100589.5254 83163 12172 P12 LMC Cities Bulletin NOUSE RESEARCH *CITY LISTING DEPARTMENT * 29 Sep 89 *CITY LOGL GOVERNMENT AID 8 EQUALIZA71ON AiD PAGE: 1Z SPECIAL SESSION A1D RUN: SSCT1b w * * * * * BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EOUALI2TN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL CLUSTER 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID AID FOR EDUC.AMOUNT ED. AID REGION GROUP CITY 1)2)3)4=(2+33 5)6)7) NON-MET MOD.SI2E CITIES LAKEftElO CITY 332381 347177 49857 397035 10882 336295 49857 LAMBERTON CITY 143874 152049 21581 173631 8406 143643 21581 LANESBORO CITY 144449 154403 1%52 174056 5720 1486$3 19652 LECENTER CITY 225667 246007 33408 279414 21065 224941 33408 LEROY CITY Of 88236 97202 13235 110438 8402 88800 13235 ESTER PRAIRIE 128877 136325 19332 155657 14256.122069 19332 LITTLEFORK CIT 80460,86331.6253 92583 4121 82209 6253 LYLE CITY OF 62761 67208 9414 76622 3078 64130 9414 MABEL CITY OF 134888 141614 20233 161847 5208 136406 20233 MADELIA CITY 0 279381 302759 37163 339922 19138 283621 37163 MADISON LAKE C 56798 60210 8520 68730 5101 55109.8520 MANNOMEN CITY 221727 231951 25651 257602 10843 221108 25651 MAPLE LAKE CIT 136823 144080 19782 163862 20711 123369 19782 MAPLETON CITY 125028 141604 18754 160358 11451 130153 18754 MCINTOSN CiTr 90119 95636 13518 109153 4374 91261 13518 MEDFORD CITY 0 86393 92409 12959 105368 7364 85045 12959 MENANGA CITY 0 149216 157623 18954 176577 9162 148461 18954 MINN LAKE CITY 96941 100531 14541 115073 4587 95944 14541 MINNEOTA CITY 190145 204745 28522 233267 11384 193361 28522 MONTGOMERY CIT 343914 356709 51587 408296 29815 326894 51587 • MORGAN CITY OF 167929 173188 25189 198377 7204.165984 25189 MORRISTOYII CIT 80332 86737 12050 98786 5345 81392 12050 NEW LONDON CIT 112148 114497 16724 136221 9688 109809 16724 NEY RICNLAND C 117216 128778 17582 146360 10619 118159 17582 N[COLLET CITY 77365 82056 11605 93661 7126 74930 11605 OKLEE CITY. OF 70902 75430 10635.86065 4154 71276 10635 ONAMIA CITY OF 63693 68953 7480 76433 5731 63222 74$0 ORONOCC CITY 0 54943 60186 5966 66152 9311 50875 5966 ORTONVILLE CIT 371108 391923 55666 447589 18562 373361 55666 OSAKIS CITY OF 217569 228663 32635 261298 11796 216867 32635 PARKERS PRAIRI 96345 105244 14452 119695 6861 98382 14452 PRINSBURG CITY 72403 76107 10860 86968 6600 69507 10860 PROCTOR CITY 0 277751 312000 41663 353663 26067 285934 41663 RANDALL CITY 0 39820 43570 5973 49543 3701 39868 5973 RAYMOND CITY 0 85768 93554 12865 106420 4904 88650 12865 RENVnLE ctTY 218950 232711 32843 265553 11808 220903 32843 RICNMONO CITY 94608 100660 14191 114851 10759 89901 14191 ROCK CREEK CIT 24309 27955 3646 31602 10940 17016 3646 ROLLINGSTONE C 49550 52361 7433 59794 5863 46498 7433 ROYAL70N CITY 44409 49555 6661 56217 6846 42709 6661 RUSNFORD VILLA SACRED NEART C 24026 116642 27630 122341 3604 15993 31234 138333 6276 4455 21354 117886 3604 15993 SANDSTONE CITY 234368 244952 22356 267308 11830 233121 22356 SCANLON CITY 0 175125 180106 26269 206375 8932 171174 26269 SEBEKA CITY OF 134956 140634 12494 153128 5553 135081 12494 October 6 1989 P13 HOUSE RESEARCH *CITY LISTING DEPARTMENT * 29 Sep 89 *CI TY LOCAL GOVERNMENT A1D 8 EQUALIZATION A!D PAGE: 13 SPECIAL SESSION AID RUN: SSCT1b BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EQUALI2TN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL CLUSTER 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID AiD FOR EDUC.AMOUNT EQ. AIO REGION GROUP CITY 1)2)3)4=(2+3)5)6)7) NON-MET MOD.SI2E CITIES SHERBURN CITY 175441 181263 26316 207579 7729 173534 26316 SILVER LAKE. CI 106135 109543 15920 125463 6954 102589 15920 SPRING GROVE C 220497 231458 32326 263784 10595 220863 32326 SPRING VALLEY 373429 404165 56014 460180 21262 382903 56014 ST CHARLES CIT 275948 297990 41392 339382 29195 268794 41392 STARBUCK CITY 181083 193912 11722 205634 11187 182725 11722 STEPHEN CITY 0 86698 92484 4070 96554 7743 84741 4070 STEWART CITY 0 103859 106608 15579 122187 5770 100839 15579 TAYLORS FALLS 83701 88095 8965 97060 15178 72917 8965 TR[MONT CITY 0 137657 140634 20649 161282 6082 134552 20649 TRUMAN CITY OF 189873 199890 28481 228371 9089 190801 28481 TWIN VALLEY CI 112141 121448 16821 138269 5813 115635 16821 ULEN CITY OF 73710 76863 11057 87919 3416 73446 11057 uABASSO CITY 0 120291 125637 18044 143681 5770 119867 18044 WALNUT GROVE C 107310 115857 12530 128387 6138 109719 12530 uATERViLLE CIT 267954 284062 40193 324255 17886 266176 40193 uELCOME CITY 0 112747 119129 16912 136041 5450 113680 16912 WEST CONCORD C 80893 88241 12134 100375 6225 82016 12134 J uESTBR00K CITY 165711 173164 24857 198020 6887 166276 24857 NHEATON CITY 0 261678 281232 39252 320483 15204 266027 39252 utNTNROP CITY 238400 250537 35760 286297 11299 239238 35760 GROUP TOTALS 19825274 21106055 2765828 23871883 1300898 19805157 2765828 CITIES UNDER 500 ALBERTA CITY 0 8326 8873 1249 10121 1050 7823 1249 ALDRICH CITY 0 1119 1237 168 1405 829 408 168 ALPHA CITY OF 20318 21537 3048 24585 1100 20437 3048 ALTURA CITY OF 42877 45422 4323 49744 6711 38711 4323 ALVARADO CITY 18389 19487 584 20070 2356 17131 584 ARCO CITY OF 10253 10644 1538 12182 584 10059 1538 ASHBY CITY OF 49149 54078 7372 61450 3981 50097 7372 ASKOV CITY OF 30897 33290 3581 36871 3298 29991 3581 AUDUBON CITY 0 28806 31820 4321 36141 4318 27501 4321 AVOCA CITY OF 18938 20195 1369 21564 982 19213 1369 BACKUS CITY OF 32370 34336 4856 39192 3174 31162 4856 BADGER CITY OF 57922 60456 8688 69144 2656 57800 8688 BARNUM CITY OF 54017 55980 8103 64082 3290 52690 8103 BARRETT CITY 0 33368 35555 5005 40560 2887 32668 5005 BARRY CITY OF 1705 1961 256 2217 727 1234 256 BEARDSLEY CITY 37018 40523 5553 46076 2037 38486 5553 BEAVER BAY CIT 31665 32457 4208 36665 2852 24605 4208 BEAVER CREEK C 35139 36230 5271 41501 1451 34779 5271 BEJOU CITY OF 16500 17000 261 17261 396 16604 261 r~ P14 LMC Cities Bulletin HOUSE RESEARCH DEPARTMENT 29 Sep 89 s * CLUSTER REGION GRpUp CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID & EGUALIZATiON AID SPECIAL-SESSION AID RUN: SSCT1b CITY LISTING PAGE: 14 w s * * * * * BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EGUALIZTN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL1989LGAED. REDUC AID AID FOR EDUC. AMOUNT E0 AIDCITY (1) (2)3)4=(2+3)5) (6)T) NON-MET CITIES UNDER 500 BELLECHESTER C 10853 11787 1628 13415 1345 10442 1628BELLINGNAMCIT581035%75 3669 63344 1827 57849 3669BELTRAMICITY1052611346142712773176595811427BELVIEYCITY06682168201100237822421036609710023BENACITYOF15428162%533 16829 643 15653 533BIGELOYCITY018266195631632211951623179401632BINGNAMLAKEC16478176122472200832185154272472BISGYCITYOF2851327942837067302549428BLOINCESTCITY17419185252513210381783167422513BLUFFTONCITY29103275437371115%1679 437BOCKCITYOF4664494112450667894153124BORNCITYOF6%7 7403 352 7755 747 6657 352BOYLUSCITYOF123801365718571551418%11761 1857BOYRIVERCITY1862204927923293141735279BOYDCITYOF46077472076912541191472457356912BREEZYPOINTC1671217046017046170460BRICELTNCITY6252264356937873734476959587 0 9378BROOKPARKCIT1572716727960176876481607996pBROOKSCITYOF83379240125110490142878111251BROOKSTONCITY3846428957748667623527577BRONNSVILLECI28118311334218353512811283224218BRUNOCITYOF21134216576972235379920858697BUCKMANCITY054866309823713217344575823BURTRUMCITY01101711907165313559569113371653CALLAWYCITY2928230499-3554 34052 1784 28715 3554CALUMETCLTY010164710376714577118344213010163714577CAMPBELLCITY34616367133215399272079346333215CANTONCITYOF53782567668067648332426543408067CARLOSCITYOF27197295194080335982170273484080CEDARMILLSCI1067.1169 160 1329 784 385 160CENTER-CITY CI 43841 47406 2453 49859 8457 38949 2453CHANDLERCITY33248358362865387023511323252865CNICKAMAYBEAC21172435318275224350289CLEARLAKECIT42724439436352502953949399946352CLEARGGTERCIT306193271124133512411461207502413CLEMENTSCITY24732257893710294991396243933710CLIMAXCITYOF28928298174339341562163276544339CLITHERALLCIT11966124652481271361711849248CLONTARFCITY23762573248282111201453248COBDENCITYOF131514086414717'/4 4COMSTOCKCITY111451184960812457156310287 608CONGERCITYOF24302259981816278141685243131816CORRELLCITY03675394335943024323511359COURTLANDCITY26437286363966326014132245043966CROMWELLCITY903310388135511743231380751355 October 6,1989 P15 I HOUSE RESEARCH *CITY LISTING DEPARTMENT * 29 Sep 89 *CITY LOGL GOVERNMENT AID Ii EQUALIZATION AID PAGE: 15 SPECIAL SESSION AID RUN: SSCT1b w * * • • * BASIC LGA TAX VASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEfORE EQUALIZTN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL CLUSTER 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID A1D FOR EDUC.AMOUNT EQ. AID REGION GROUP CITY 1)2)3)4=(2*3)5)6)7) NON-NET CITIES UNDER 500 CURRIE CITY OF 35460 38242 4209 42451 1998 36245 4209 CUYUNA CITY OF 20248 21192 2262 23453 2176 19015 2262 CYRUS CITY OF 37520 40373 5267 45639 2453 37920 5267 DAKOTA CITY OF 7429 8543 1114 58 2802 5741 1114 DALTON CITY OF 25459 27615 3542 31157 1954 25661 3542 DANVERS CITY 0 10024 11009 1504 12512 1492 9517 1504 OARFUR CITY OF 12680 13151 1902 15053 1360 11791 1402 DARWIN CITY OF 4981 5475 747 6222 2542 2933 747 DEER CREEK CIT 24140 26968 3621 30589 2661 24307 3621 DEGRAFF CITY 0 2788 2999 275 3274 1326 1673 275 DELAVAN CITY 0 35162 36268 5274 41542 3038 33229 5274 DELHI CITY OF 12136 12468 1521 13989 887 11581 1521 DENNAN CITY OF 685 761 42 803 761 0 0 DENNISON CITY 16876 18110 1162 19272 1920 16190 1162 DENT CITY OF 11198 12008 1042.13050 1281 10727 1042 DEXTER CITY OF 35423 36568 5313 41881 2059 34509 5313 DONALDSON CITY 2824 3228 300 3528 1342 1886 300 DONNELLY CITY 17760 19934 2664 22598 2006 17929 2664 DORAN CITY OF 5108 5520 766 6286 405 5115 766 DOVER CITY OF 49688 52644 2338 54982 3473 49171 2338 DOYRAY CITY OF 7865 8489 60 8549 1673 6816 60 DUMOIIT CITY OF 17395 18593 1289 19882 1593 17001 1289 DUNDAS CITY OF 31144 34351 4672 39022 7802 26549 4672 DUNDEE CITY OF 6285 6770 937 7707 398 6372 937 DUNNELL CITY 0 24850 25729 3728 29457 1284 24445 3728 EASTON CITY OF 32481 33351 4872 38223 3507 29844 4872 ECHO CITY OF 62541 63827 9381 73209 3174'60653 9381 EFFIE CITY OF 1948 1987 0 1987 1030 957 0 EtTZEN CtTY OF 8881 10213 1332 11545 2130 8083 1332 ELBA CITY OF 2567 2893 385 3278 1216 1677 385 ELI2ABETN CITY 17101 18319 1995 20314 757 17562 1995 ELKTON CITY OF 10959 11750 1644 13394 1399 10351 1644 ELMDALE CITY 0 2241 2577 336 2913 886 1691 336 ELROSA CITY OF 7611 8753 1142 9894 2153 6600 1142 ELYSIAN CITY 0 78434 80284 11765 92049 3780 76503 11765 EMMONS CITY. OF 66938 70528 4775 75304 3523 67005 4775 ERHARD CITY OF 9952 10741 1414 12154 852 9888 1414 EVAN CITY OF 3100 3565 465 4030 624 2941 465 FARWELL CITY 0 15005 15305 1236 16541 352 14953 1236 FEDERAL DAN Ci 3158 3458 474 3931 860 2598 474 FELTON CITY OF 26204 27372 3812 31184 1790 25582 3812 FIFTY LAKES CI 1203 1227 0 1227 1227 0 0 FINLAYSON CITT 18032 19586 1276 20661 3149 16437 1276 FISHER CITY OF 21410 23746 3212 26957 3005 20741 3212 FLENSBURG CITY 15443 16790 2272 19062 1631 15160 2272 P16 LMC Cities Bulletin HOUSE RESEARCH DEPARTMENT * 29 Sep 89 w • * * * CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID i EOLIALIZATION AIO SPECIAL SESSION AIO RUN: SSCT1b CITY LISTING PAGE: 16 BASIC LGA TAX BASE:PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EOUAlI2TN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL CLUSTER 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID AID FOR EDUC.AMOUNT E0. AID REGION GROUP CITY 1)2)3)4=<2t3)5)6)7) NON-MET CITIES UNDER 500 FLORENCE CITY 7532 7890 900 8790 310 7580 900 FORAOA CITY OF 3104 3570 466 4035 2708 861 466 FORESTON CITY 26673 28742 2133 30874 4066 24675 2133 FORT RIPLEY CI 906 1042 136 117!!813 229 136 FOUNTAIN CITY 15421 17734 2313 20047 3052 14683 2313. F00(IIOME CITY 0 9907 10661 1179 11840 691 9970 1179 FRANKLIN CITY 84597 86448 12690 99137 2424 84024 12690 FRANKLIN CITY 6435 6564 0 6564 1110 5454 0 FREEBORN CITY 26401 28921 3960 32881 2682 26239 3960 FROST CITY OF 37760 38636 5664 44300 2676 35961 5664 FUNICIEY CITY 0 197 201.0 201 152 49 0 GARFIELD CITY 7338 8357 1101 9458 2362 5995 1101 GARRISON CITY 11120 12169 0 12169 5642 6527 0 GARVIN CITY OF 27104 27723 4066 31789 761 26963 4066 GARY CITY OF 41449 42278 6217 48495 1532 40746 6217 GENEVA CITY OF 35563 39292 5334 44626 3331 35960 5334 GENOLA CITY OF 1201 1381 180 1561 1329 53 180 GEORGETOYN CIT 8123 9028 1218 10246 1125 7903 1218 GHENT CITY OF 34099 37064 5115 42179 2438 34626 5115 GiLNAN CITY OF 2055 2300 308 2609 1707 594 308 GONVICK CITY 0 48039 49601 7206 56807 2258 47343 7206 GOODRIDGE CITY 21463 22287 932 23219 554 21733 932 GRANADA CITY 0 43003 46170 4676 50846 1612 44558 4676 GRASSTON CITY 13239 14077 1466 15543 819 13259 1466 GREEN ISLE CIT 36479 37614 5472 43086 3193 34422 5472 GREENWALD cirY 8785 10013 1318 11331 2733 7280 1318 GREY EAGLE CiT 53056 55788 6415 62202 2131 53657 6415 GRYGLA CLTY OF 30806 32661 3911 36572 1359 31302 3911 GULLY CITY OF 6399 6901 740 7641 744 6156 740 NACKENSACK CIT 19406 21984 1499 23482 5837 16146 1499 HADLEY CITY OF 3105 3335 255 3590 1230 2105 255 NALMA CITY OF 4834 5344 725 6069 349 4995 725 HAMMOND CITY 0 8648 9442 1297 10739 908 8534 1297 NANLEY FALLS C 39555 40528 5933 46461 2328 38200 5933 HANSKA CITY OF 4%T2 52265 7451 59716 3302 48963 7451 HARDING CITY 0 1450 1560 83 1644 898 662 83 NARDYICK CITY 26303 28190 2302 30492 1301.26889 2302 NARTLAND CITY 44835 46856 5783 52639 3251 43605 5783 HATFIELD CITY 1079 1241 162 1403 534 TOT 162 NAYYARD CITY O 30827 33293 4624 37917 3183 30110 4624 HAZEL RUN CITY 7824 8348 627 8975 703 7645 627 NEIDELBERG CtT 1040 11%156 1352 675 521 156 HENDRUN CtTY 0 34814 37622 4875 42497 1808 35814 4875 NENRIETTE CITY 1280 1428 192 1620 464 963 192 NEHITT CITY OF 19929 22330 2989 25320 1303 21028 2989 October 6,1989 ply I HOUSE RESEARCH *CITY LISTING DEPARTMENT * 29 Sep 89 *CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID EQUALIZATION AID.PAGE: 17 SPECIAL SESSION AID RUN: SSCT1b w * * * *w * * * * BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EOUALI2TN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL CLUSTER 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID AID FOR EDUC.AMOUNT EQ. AID REGION GROUP CITY 1)2)3)4=(2+3)5)6)7) NON-MET CITIES UNDER 500 HILL. CITY CITY 48844 50731 7327 58057 9523 41207 7327 HILLMAN CITY 0 1790 1890 45 1935 324 1566 45 HITTERDAL CITY 36554 38168 5369 43537 1810 36358 5369 HOLLAND CITY 0 30293 32193 3363 35556 1235 30958 3363 HOLLANDALE CIT 31693 33960 4685 38645 337!30583 4685 HOLLOUAr cITY 13136 14208 1965 16173 1646 12562 1%5 HOLT CITY OF 6894 7339 4%7835 334 7005 496 HUMBOLDT CITY 5859 6346 778 7124_1060 5286 778 IHLEN CITY OF 10634 11392 1164.12557 466 10927 1164 IONA CITY OF 25079 27172 3762 30934 1554 25618 3762 IRON JUNCTION 3709 4002 428 4430 831 3171 428 ISLAND VIEW CI 208 212 0 212 212 0 0 JEFFERS CITY 0 63867 67713 8240 75953 3263 64449 8240 JENKINS CITY 0 11351 12327 1298 13625 2462 9865 1298 JOHNSON CITY 0 2419 2679 363 3042 372 2307 363 KANDIYOHI CITY 38679 42083 5802 47885 4659 37424 5802 KELLINER CITY 21174 22847 2650 25497 2031 20816 2650 KELLOGG CITY 0 37084 40686 5563 46248 2885 37801 5563 KENNEDY CITY 0 33828 35615 5074 40689 3590 32025 5074 KENNETH CITY 0 9402 9867 1106 10973 724 9138 1106 KENSINGTON CIT 30272 33012 4541 37553 1837 31175 4541 KENT CITY OF 14105 14567 17%16363 685 13882 1796 KERRICK CITY 0 3322 3570 232 3801 665 2905 232 KETTLE RIVER C 21918 22991 3288 26279 2106.20885 3288 KILKENNY CITY 23077 24029 2897 26926 893 23136 2897 KINBRAE CITY 0 1109 1275 166 1442 328 948 166 KINGSTON CITY 2134 2410 320 2730 759 1651 320 KINNEY CITY OF 32766 33997 4915 38912 1509 32488 4915 LAKE BRONSON C 41064 43455 6160 49615 1558 41898 6160 LAKE HENRY CIT 3631 4032 545 4576 610 3421 545 LAKE LILLIAN C 38416 41795 5762 47557 3043 38752 5762 LAKE WILSON CI 38698 40802 5805 46607 2181 38621 5805 LANCASTER CITY 50179 54179 5218 59398 1854 52325 5218 LAPORTE CITY 0 5472 5581 298 5879 1225 4356 298 LASALLE CITY 0 6314 6936 695 7630 1438 5498 695 LASTRUP CITY 0 4105 4535 616 5151 886 3649 616 LENGBY CITY OF 17056 17718 2558 20277 526 17192 2558 LEONARD CITY 0 1605 1724 158 1882 314 1410 158 LEONIDAS CITY 39117 39899 2271 42170 822 39078 2271 LEHISVILLE CIT 28000 30444 4200 34644 2412 28032 4200. LISMORE CITY 0 LONG BEACH CIT 41082 2759 42611 3089 6162 414 48773 3503 1239 3089 41372 0 6162 0 LONGVILLE CITY 13714 15572 0 15572 6531 9041 0 LOUISBURG CITY 3288 3661 493 4154 774 2887 493 LOWRY CITY OF 36718 37782 5508 43290 1955 35827 5508 P18 LMC Cities Bulletin NWSE RESEARCH DEPARTMENT 29 Sep 89 CLUSTER REGION GROUP CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID & EGUALILITION AIO SPECIAL. SESSION AID RUN: SSCT1b CITY LISTING PAGE: 18 BASK LGA 7AX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EGUALi2TN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL1989LGAED. REDUC AID AIO fOR EDUC. AMOUNT E0 AIDCITY (1) (2)3)4=(2+3)5) (6)7~ NON-MET CITIES UNDER 500 LUCAN CITY OF 40923 42899.6138 49037 1299 41600 6138IYNDCITYOF35466369855320423051904350815320MAGNOLIACiTr1016211422152412946234090821524MANCHESTERCIT5580593732062575515385320MANHATTANBEAC0000 MAPLEVIEY CITY 51539 52627 3874 56501 0 887 0 51740 0 3874MARIETTACITY5334854415515659571977534385156MAYNARDCITY08527687305102109751629998430710210MCGRATHCITY0112012381681406-340 898 168MCGREGORCITY52587549397888628273333.51605 7888MCKINLEYCITY6643367762311470876738670243114MEADOIJLANDSCI8441906512661033161884471266METREGROVECI58036671870754211175554870MENTORCITYOF6727757010098579140561641009MIDDLERIVERC264882732853427862191825410534MILANCITY -0F 58631 61169 8795 69964 2063 59107 8795MILLERVILLECI1246132572139778254372MILLVILLECITY57496278862714018344444862MILROYCITYOF2802800994204.34;04 1730 28369 4204MILTONACITT0126391410618%16002 1959 12148 18%MILAN CITY CITY 12273 14073 1841 15914 2009 12063 1841MINNEISKACITY6204681.9 931 7750 1223 5596 931MI2RANCITYOF2235243533527703772057335MORTON. CITY OF 73867 76868 11080 87948 3324 73544 11080MOTLEYCITYOF58964629006551694514642582586551MURDOCKCITY044287465075803523104705418025803MYRTLECITYOF47005112643575483042816t,;NASHUA CITY OF 1567 1802 179 1981 1229 573 179NASSAUCITYOF56256223844706711085115844NELSONCITYOF54916062824688614104652824NERSTRANDCITY22263233783339267173186201923339NEVISCITYOF51879551031846569494362507411846NEWAUBURNCIT25443277533816315691957257963816NEWMUNICHCIT27721299163621335372135277813621NEYFOLDENCITY.4%78 53159 7452 60611 2116 51043 7452NIELSVILLECIT14347.14968 2152 17120 624 14344 2152NIMRODVILLAGE14%1720 224 1945 645 1075 224NORCROSSCITY1679517137251919656846162912519NORTHREDY00062257159934809317345425934NORTHOMEciTr34182355925127407191876337165127NORTHROPCITY16868189412530214712053168882530ODESSACITYOF34815355113685391%826 34685 3685OOiNCITYOF10900120901635137251019110711635OGENACITYOF1978021431296724398781206502967OG1lVIECITY0857778765668%94552 2752 84904 6896 October 6,1989 P19 HOUSE RESEARCH *CITY LISTING DEPARTMENT * 29 Sep 89 *CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID 8 EQUALIZATION AIO PAGE: 19 SPECIAL SESSION AID RUN: SSCT1b BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EQUAl12TN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL CLUSTER 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID A10 FOR EDUC.AMOUNT E0. AID REGION GROUP CITY 1)2)3)4=(2+3)5)6)7) NON-MET CITIES UNDER 500 OKABENA CITY 0 20941 22033 3141 25174 1264-20769 3141 ORMSBY CITY OF 9817 10934.1473 12406 1476 9458 1473 ORR CITY OF 50171 51847 3914 55761 2924 48923 3914 OSLO CITY OF 62700 64227 9405 73632 3238 60989 9405 OSTRANDER CITY 20500 22187 3075 25262 2855 19332 3075 OTTERTAIL CITY 8487 9760 0 9760 8018 1742 0 PALISADE CITY 3789 4357 568 4926 867 3490 568 PEASE CITY OF 7162 7619.260 7879 1801 5818 260 PEMBERTON CITY 12225 13198 1834 15032 2071 11127 1834 PENNOCK CITY 0 50303 52872 7545 60417 3760 49112 7545 PERLEY CITY OF 9472 10168 868 11.037 1177 8991 868 PETERSON CITY 16042 17632 2406.20038 1650 15982 2406 PILLAGER CITY 19326 22225 2899 25124 2469 19756 2899 PLATO CITY OF 22846 24011 3427 27438 4542 19469 3427 PLEASANT LAKE 1165 1340 175 1515 1340 0 139 PLUMMER CITY 0 34950 36112 5243 41354 3062 33049 5243 PORTER CITY OF 30727 32030 3623 35653 1428 30601 3623 OUAMBA CITY OF 2177 2391 327 2717 709 1681 327 RACINE CITY OF 14028 15649 2104 17753 2872 12778 2104 RANTER CITY OF 16083 17257 1571 18828 1592 15664 1571 REGAL CITY OF 809 930 121 1052 544 386 121 REMER CITY Of 41627 44941 4851 49792 2850 42091 4851 REVERE. CITY OF 16954 17344 2543 19887 993 16350 2543 RICHVILLE CITY 2303 2585 345 2930 454 2130 345 RiVERTON CITY 13258 14061 0 14061 3138 10923 0 RONNEBY CITY 0 1014 1166 152 1318 380 786 152 ROOSEVELT CITY 3675 3917 248 4164 783 3134 248 ROSCOE CITY OF 4712 5419 707 6126 1038 4381 707 ROSE CREEK CIT 47784 51138 6252 57390 2830 48308 6252 ROTNSAY CITY 0 46958 51363 7044 58407 4262 47101 7044 RUSHMORE CITY 41393 44675 6209 50884 2304 42371 6209 RUSSELL CITY 0 70575 73227 10586 83813 2412 70814 10586 RUTNTON CITY 0 36358 39344 4424 43767 1457 37887 4424 RUTLEDGE CITY 1900 2185 285 2470 1371 814 285 SABIN CITY OF 20317 21835 3048 24883 3353 18482 3048 SANBORN CITY 0 58446 62087 8767 70854 5286 56802 8767 SARGEANT CITY 4344 4813 360 5173 1331 3482 360 SEAFORTH CITY 11742 12197 1761 13958 780 11417 1761 SEDAN CITY Of 1335 1476 200 1676 449 1027 200 SHAPER CITY Of 15091 16864.2264 19128 3921 12944 2264 SHELLY CITY OF 39808 41988 3503 45491 1731 40257 3503 SNEVLIN CITY 0 6695 7356 1004 8361 1130 6226 1004 SKYLINE CITY 0 7147 8219 1072 9291 3934 4285 1072 SOBIESKI CITY 2977 3407 447 3853 1410 1997 447 SOLHAY CITY OF 3385 3763 508 4270 658 3105 508 P20 LMC Cities Bulletin HOUSE RESEARCH DEPARTMENT 29 Sep 89 CITY LISTING CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID & EWlALIZATION AID * SPECIAL SESSION AID RUN:.SSCT'ib PAGE. 20 s * * * * * * BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CLUSTER CURRENT 1989 LGA BEFORE-EGUALIZTN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL REGION GROUP CITY ED. REDUC AID AID FOR EDUC.AMOUNT EG. AID s 6)7) NON-MET CITIES UNDER 500 SOUTH HAVEN CI 22736 24136 1107 25243 1785SPRINGHiILCI242427883643151 22350 1107 SOUAP LAKE CIT 3158 3554 474 528 2260 364 ST ANTHONY CIT 1049 1206 157 4028 836 2718 474 ST NILAIRE CIT 15797 18167 2370 1364 20536 563 643 157 ST LEO CITY OF 77~8381 1154 2634..15533 2370 ST MARTIN CITY 14492 15918 2174 9535 711 7670 1154 ST.ROSA CITY 0 3120 3382 439 18092 2310 13608 2174 ST STEPHEN CIT 20054 23062 3008 3821 26070 713 2669 439 ST VINCENT CIT 6678 7204 1002 5315 17748 3008 STEEN CITY OF 8274 9084 1241 8205 425 6779 1002 STORDEN CITY 0 54974 56167 8246 10326 694 8390 1241 STRANO~IIST Ci 10426 10826 207 64414 2945 53223 8246 STRATHCONA CIT 2326 2485 136 11033 523 10303 207 STURGEON LAKE 5381 6188 807 2621 220 2265 136 SUNBURG CITY 0 11919 12829 1391 6995 14220 2130 738 4059 807 SPANVILLE CITY 55262 57826 1392 12091 1391 TACONITE. CITY 77021 79020 11553 59219 3253 54574 1392 TAMARACK CITY 5030 5481 622 90573 3529 75491 11553 TAOPI CITY Of 1166 1341 175 6103 678 4803 622 TAUNTON CITY 0 6941 7473 584 1516 407 934 175 TENNEY;CITY OF 1787 1878 8057 1492 5980 584 TENSTRIKE CITY 2776 3036:- 98 391 1976 135 1743 qg THOMSON CITY 0 10365 10572 563 3427.1937 109q 391 TINTAN CITY OF 7637 8363 1146 11136 2698 7874 563 TRAIL CITY OF 3616 3956 542 9509 549-7814 1146 TROMMALD CITY 8901 9333 789 4499 512 3444 542 TROSKY CITY OF 1529 1733 229 10122 863 8470 789 TURTLE RIVER C 886 1962 611 1122 229 THIN LAKES CIT 30163 31281 14 4524 900 875 10 14 UNDERP000 CITY 50362 53642 6704 35806 603 1551 29730 4524 UPSALA CITY OF 52589 56205 4241 46 6044 2280 51362 6704 URBANK CITY OF 2058 2315 309 6 3815 52390 4241 UTICA CITY of 21488 2400 2623 833 1482 309 VERGAS CITY OF 8551 9499 1283 25662 2886 20376 2400 VERNDALE CITY 55300 59699 5544 1p~3129 1283 VERNON CENTER 27092 29001 4064 65243 5095 54604 5544 VESTA CITY OF 46245 4~5 33065 26023 4064 VIKING CITY OF 19672 20201 6937 54721 2181 45604 6937 VILLARD CITY 0 28931 29965 1605 21806 19867 1605 VINIMG CITY Of 8380 8916 4340 34305 2360 27605 4340 PANKON CITY OF 19445 21254 410 1379 9326 226 7 5 410 PAIDORf CITY 0 44914 45843 6742 33 S2584 42 1 13 1379 PALTERS CITY 0 18805 19181 2597 2361 43482 6742 PALTNAN CITY 0 13905 14788 2086 21778 405 18777 2597 16873 1219 13569 2086 October 6,1989 P21 CITY LISTING HOUSE RESEARCH * DEPARTMENT * CITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID a EQUALIZATION AID PAGE: 21 29 Sep 89 w SPECiAI SESSION AID RUN: SSCT1b w * * BASIC LGA TAX BASE PRELIM.AID CURRENT BEFORE EQUALI2TN TOTAL REDUCTION FINAL LGA FINAL CLUSTER 1989 LGA ED. REDUC AID AID FOR EDUC.AMOUNT EQ. AIO REGION GROUP CITY U 2)3)4=(2+3)5)6)7) ; NON-MET CITIES UNDER 500 7710 8425 1157 9582 733 7693 71ST PANDA CITY OF WARBA CITY OF 9406 10345 638 10982 2163 8181 638 WATSON CITY OF 25985 27435 3898 31332 1680.25755 3898 YAUBUN CITY OF 25058 27761 3719 31519 2516 25244 3759 WAVERLY CITY 0 84216 86402 12632 99035 8892 77510 12632 WENDELL CITY 0 34372 35248 4497 39745 1681 33567 4497 WEST UNION CIT 1712 1947 257 2203 522 1424 257 WESTPORT CITY 1963 2086 86 2172 286 1800 WNALAN CITY OF 6139 6730 921 7651 623 6108 921 WILDER CITY OF 8409 9061 1167 10227 563 8498 1167 WILLIAMS CITY 19748 21537 2962 24499 1864 1%73 2962 WILLOW RIVER C 26280 27845 526 28371 2922 24924 526 WILMONT CITY 0 32977 36085 4947 41032 2566 33519 4947 WILTON CITY OF 1157 1277 119 13%1277 0 0 WINGER CITY OF 256%26668 3854 30522 2072 245%3854 WINTON CITY OF 22486 23902 1023 24925 1107 22795 1023 WOLF LAKE CITY 779 ffi9 79 917 344 495 WOLVERTON CITY 18577 18952 2787 21738 1734 17218 2787 WOOD LAKE CITY 73419 76031 10460 86491 3614 72417 10460 d WOOOSTOCK CITY 21765 23243 1719 24%1 959 22284 1719 WRENSHALL CITY 68753 70128 25%72724 5600 64528 25% WRIGNT CITY OF 2039 2345 306 2651 1155 1189 306 WYKOFF CITY OF 78909 81126 11836 92962 3551 77574 11836 2EMPLE CITY OF 1752 2015 263 2278 821 1194 263 ZUMBRO FALLS C 9047 9872 1357 11229 1545.8327 1357 7805736 8256654 977189 9233843 709855 7546799 976549 GROUP TOTALS 173045994 184400046 16137346 200537393 17236786 167163261.16136707 REG10N TOTALS 376375801 406453377 18876776 425330153 74728033 331725344 18863872 ! STATE TOTALS P22 LMC Cities Bulletin League of Minnesota Cities Policy Adoption MeetingThursday, November 16 1989 Hotel Sofitel, Minneapolis8:00 a.m.Registration 9:00-9:45 a.m. 12:00-1:45 Rm. Lunch --1t-ansportation issuesEnvironmentalissueCommissisonerl.rn Levine,C°mmissi°np' Gerald Willey Pollution Control T~nsportation + ~~ment of Agrncy 2:00-4:30MikeRobertson, Diroctor, Ot!]ce ~. Waste P•m• Adoption o[ LMC legislative policiesManagementGPrningremarks -- LMC Presidrnt Millie MacLeod9:45-10:15 a.m.Councilmember, MoorheadOpenmeetinglawAdoptionofrakegoverningtheolic dpyaoptionMarieAnimnson, Counsel, Minnesota New a ~g Associatio P~n Conardaatron of proposed. legislativePriorities Policies and 10:15-10:30 a.m.Break 1 Development strategies 10:30-11:45 a.m. Z.Elections and ethicsPropertytaxissues3' Grneral legislation and personnelDuetotheuncertain[ in the 4• Lend use, rnYPropertytaxarea, the ~BY+ env~orrmrny andsP~ationLeagueisunabletoprovidetentiatvespeakersforthe5• Revenue sourcesPropertytaxissuessession. Our goal is to have th 6echairsoftheHouseandSenateTaxCommittees. Federal legislative Other businessInvitedtospeak Adjournment LlNovember 16,1989 City: LMC Policy Adoption Registration Form Contact Person: Hotel Sofitel, Minneapolis Telephone # A.C. Name Title AddressRegistrationperperson; $25.00 Zip Code MAIL TO: League of Minnesota Ckties,183sUnr'versity Avenue East, St. Paul M N 55101 MAIL TO: Housing reservation form 5601 W. 78th Street I-eague of Minnesota Cities Minneapolis, MN 55435 -3899 Policy Adoption Meeting612) 835-1900 November 16, 1989Toinsurespacelrateavailability, please respond prior to Name November 1, 1989.Representing Address Please specify: 65 + Tax Single (One Person)City ~~ -_ Zip 65 + Tax Double (Two people) Month D+Y Yev / / / ~ IAnivelDateA,rivd Time Month aY YevCheckintime3:00 p.m. Check out time 12:Opnoon I will arrive after 4:00 p.m, please guarantee the reservationwith: Credit Card) Ntunber and Expiration DatePhone: (___) League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Avenue East St. Paul, MN 55101-2526 Phone: 612-227-5600 FAX: 612-221-0986 lhe League ofMinnesota Cities Publishes the Legislative Bulletin weekly during the Legislative session. Subscriptions: members- 20: non-members-$35. Contact Rose Minke, League of Minnesota Cities. Donald Slater Executive Director Deb Nyberg Assistant Editor Jean Mehle Goad Editor League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Staff Jcel Jamnik Environment, personnel, public safety, general govern- ment Laurie Hacking I,GA, taxes, finance Stanley Peskar Pensions, personnel, public safety Donald Slater Development tools Ann Higgins Federal legislation, elections, ethics Sarah Hackett Legislative analyst Barry Ryan Tax policy analyst Chuck Bichler Legislative assistant Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Legislative Staff Vern Peterson Executive Director Roger Peterson Director of Legislative Affairs ar•~H •.ar~~•} u~~.~~•~ EIRST CLASS U.S. POSTAGE PAID St. Paul, MN PERMIT NO. 3223 TMc .' ~c.• wGH l~r Where to get legislative information at the Capitol* Copies of bills House Chief Clerk's Office - 296-2314, Rm. 211, State Capitol Secretary of Senate's Office - 296-2343, Rm. 231, State Capitol Bill status, authors, companion, committee referral (by bill number, author, or topic) House Index - 296-6646, Rm. 211, State Capitol Senate Index - 296-2887, Rm. 231 State Capitol Weekly committee schedules, bill introductions, and summaries of committee and floor action House Information Office - 296-2146, 175 State Office Building Senate Information Office - 296-0504, Rm. 231, State Capitol Recording of the following day's committee schedule and agenda, after 4:30 p.m.) House Call" (House committee schedule) - 296-9283 Senate Hotline (Senate committee schedule) - 296-8088 To reach a member on the House or Senate floor House Sergeant at Arms - 296-4860 Senate Page Desk - 296-4159 To notify the governor's office of your concerns Governor Rudy Perpich - 296-3391, Rm. 130, State Capitol All addresses are St. Paul, MN 55155, all area codes 612 2077 W. LARPENTEUR AVENUE FALCON HEIGHTS, MN 55113-5594 PHONE (612) 644.5050 FAX (612) 644-8675 October 24, 1989 T0: Jan Wiessner FROM: Tom Kelly RE: Survey of Municipalities The following communities are raising or plan to raise taxes for the loss of LGA: Roseville, Arden Hills, Blaine, Columbia Heights, Circle Pines, Shoreview and Moundsview. The City of St. Anthony is raising taxes and have dropped a $300,000 CIP bond for equipment.. New Brighton was increasing taxes anyway so now it's a larger increase. Andover was faced with making up a 200,000 deficit from prior years so they are raising taxes and freezing expenditures. The cities of Brooklyn Park and Plymouth are raising taxes and cutting 1990 budget. Finally, Little Canada said it has no change in their budget. TK:pp HOME OF THE MINNESOTA STATE FAIR AND THE U OF M INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURE W v] W U doWD000001~p O NAO ~ r-I u~ N op OC"1Ma11~i C7 \ n w 0000 N O w w w ao, ~OMMH~ 00 may' N a0 a0 H H ao orn~~H OMOn x r-I r-I W C7 ~ zo ~oornrno, ul r-I M N Nx\O O O O~ NOMI~a\~ UO~ w w w 00~NN ~ w 00 1~ M M r-I r-I MOB pO01O~ 01 O I~ ,-~ n n p r-I r-I r-I M D-+ H W W W O W H Chi O rn ~~ o rn rn a s orn~-I rn A O o O ~o ~o H 00 w w w wr{ W ~~rnr-I H W A H O 00~7N01 N MO~7 H Ol Ol 01 Ol 1~Qi W 0p n n 1~ C I ~t v M ~'W pL,01 r-1 r-I r-I Q'M H ~ Q,1 r-i V} di U O A x x w H H 00 ~ M r-I V1 I~ 00 N t11 1~ ~ pp z H p1 r-I ~ O ~O E" ~00 1~ w w w Op .--I Op M 0p ~O CA w o0 O to r-1 l0 01 n N O a\ ~ w u'1 0p ~O r-I r1 W o0 Cl ~ H H ~v~' H 0 nCO0 H O i r-I r-I r--IWr-I N w a ~n a H d a0 H O z az O Ha A H ~ w ~,w x q U H '~ p Q',Hd DC CY. •L'7 H 3 Ri Qi N ~ H H y~ Da b ~,W ~H c!1 \ H H •rl .F.J H W H H 'J •~W AHUU•rl U W b N W Oa,aa u x a wF' ~ ~ a, ~d a d HHaUU+.~ u o moxaw' a~ d d~ro c~ v o 0 H H C v p 0 E-+H O\\HAHWW A H +~ ~ waHa~ u~ 00 .--I ovr a,a~~~x a, ro b ~Uwe •n~DC cn '~HHUV~ a .nHWAa ~ b ty H H DC H w W UDC DCHWAWHU141D', O z~~~ a ~~~PaHH D,tn D-' W~ ~ N W W OOUaaHv~~~nH v to O NOWWU] H r..a ~ HaaQU~cd K 00 NHaa