Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCAgenda_89Sep27CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 A. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. B. ROLL CALL: WALLIN BUSH CIERNIA BALDWIN CHENOWETH WIESSNER S. CHENOWETH ATTORNEY ENGINEER C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER I3, 1989 ACTION: D. PUBLIC HEARING 1. 7:30 P.M. - DELINQUENT UTILITY C-7?~RGES HEARIiQG ACTION: E. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Disbursements a. Disbursements through 9/27/89, $52,382.35 b. Payroll, 9/1/89 - 9/15/89, $11,098.57 2. Cancellation of Check #22713 3. Commission Minutes 4. Licenses ACTION: F. REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Fire Department Fund Raising Discussion ACTION: 2. Smoking Policy ACTION: 3. 1990 Lauderdale Fire Protection/Presention Contract ACTION: 4. State Fair Parking ACTION: 5. Proposed Recycling Conttract with Supercycle, Inc. ACTION: 6. Stratford Professional Office Park Assessment Agreement ACTION• 7. Agreement with Roseville Area Schools Regarding Playground ACTION: AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 PAGE 2 G. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND UPDATES H. ADJOURNMENT: ACTION: CJ ADDENDUM TO SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 COUNCIL AGENDA Addition to Consent Agenda Item E(4} Blacktop Maintenance Co. #370 881 East County Road E Vadnais Heights, MN 55127 Vasko Rubbish Removal #368 NEW 920 Atlantic Street St. Paul, MN 55109 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 13, 1989 Baldwin convened the meeting at 7:10 P.M. p,LL MEMBERS PRESENT Baldwin, Bush, P. Chenoweth, Ciernia, and Wallin. were Gedde, Maurer, Wiessner and S. Chenoweth. Also present Item E (6), Planning Commission Minutes of September 11, 1989, was added to the Consent Agenda. MINUTES OF AUGUST 30, 1989 APPROVED ADDENDUM TO CONSENT AGENDA The Minutes of August 30, consent. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED 1989 were approved by unanimous Council approved the following Consent Agenda: 1. Disbursements: a. Disbursements through 9/13/8$9~984.857~86b. Payroll 8/16/89 - 8/31/89, 2. Solid Waste Commission Minutes of Augusta, 1989 3. Licenses, Northeast Sheet Metal, #367, and Cronstroms Heating and Air Conditioning, #369 to Human 4. Appointment of Gwen Willems, 1880 Tatum, Rights Commission, Term to Expire 12/31/89 5. Cancellation of Checks #22679 and #22641 6. Planning Commission Minutes of August 30, 1989 DISCUSSIONDEPARTMENTFANDECITY OFOROSEVILLEOM RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S Council discussed the law enforcement proposals presented by the the Ramsey County Sheriff's Department and the Roseville Theice Department at a workshop preceding the Council Meeting. discussion was interrupted to open the public hearing scheduled for 7:30 P.M. 7:30 P.M. - PUBEUR O ROSELAWNPROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS OF gAMLINE AVENUE, LARPENT Baldwin opened the public hearing, noted the Affidavits of Publication and Mailing, and outlined the hearing process. Maurer then Prssandedroposedpassessmenpsan and explained the estimated cost P BILL SOUKOUP, 1763 Hp,NB,INE, asked what the new werefslightly numbers indicated to which Maurer replied they higher. Soukoup then addressed the following concerns: 1) the need to repair the Gottfried Pit with this project as he felt it was an optional issue, 2) the need for the sidewalueanaoned suggested it be placed on the Roseville side, 3) q MINUTES SEPTEMBER 31, 1989 PAGE 2 whether or not property owners would be assessed for theGottfriedPitandsidewalkprojects. Maurer replied that theywillbeutilizingmaterialsoutofthepittoreplacesoilsonHamline, that the lift station at the Pit is presently unsafe,and it is more economical to include the project in the largestreetimprovementprojectthantodoitseparatelyatalaterdate. Baldwin informed Mr. Soukoup that there are no plans toassessforthepitimprovementorforthepathwayasitispartoftheCity's pathway network. Fenita Foley, 1905 Hamline, inquired about the environmentalstudyresults. Maurer replied that the environmental worksheethasbeensubmittedtotheCountyforreview, and when theprojectentersintothefinaldesignitwillthenbedeterminedwhetherornotanenvironmentalimpactstudyisnecessary. Ms.Foley also inquired about the width of the boulevard and MaurerexplainedthattheCountyhasagreedtoa4footboulevardwithdeviationsto6feetinRosevilleandwouldprobablybeagreeabletothesameinFalconHeights. Ms. Foley stated shefelthopelessbecauseshedidnotthinkhervoicewasbeingheardbytheCouncil. Baldwin explained that Council also feelshopelessattimes, but that the County owns the land, and thattheFalconHeightsCouncilisnottheonlygovernmentalbodyincontrolofthestreet. He also stressed that the Council didgetsomechangesmadeintheproject. TERRY SOUKOUP, 1763 HAMLINE, questioned the cost listed on thehearingnotice, $370,000 when Maurer has presented an amount of99,078. Maurer explained that the $370,000 was based on 1/4theareawithinFalconHeights) of the entire $1,500,000projectbutthecitywillbebilledforapproximately $100,000asitsshare. There being no others wishing to be heard, Baldwin closed thehearingat8:10 P.M. Following a brief discussion, Council directed Maurer to requestthatRamseyCountynarrowtheboulevardto4feet. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT FUND RAISER Fire Chief Lindig requested that Council approve the Department's plan to hold a fund raiser at the Roseville KnightsofColumbusHallonNovember18, 1989 and stressed that thefundsraisedwouldbeusedforequipment. Following a briefdiscussion, P. Chenoweth moved approval of the fund raiser inthenameoftheFalconHeightsFireDepartmentwithsuchfundstobeusedforequipment. Motion carried unanimously. FUNDING FOR NEW COPIER APPROVED Council reviewed and discussed Accountant Tom Kelly's memo datedSeptember13, 1989, documenting the need for a new copier fortheCityOffice, after which Ciernia moved authorization of anexpenditureofupto $8,000 for a new copier. Motion carriedunanimously. MINUTES SEPTEMBER 13, 1989 PAGE 3 PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9-14.02 OF THE CODE RELATING TO SWIMMING POOLS DEFERRED TO 9/27/89 MEETING Wallin explained the Planning Commission unanimously recommended adoption of the ordinance following the Public Hearing held September 11, 1989. Council reviewed the proposed ordinance, questioned the 5 foot, non-climbable fence requirement and concurred a four foot construction fence would not be necessary for above ground pools (which must be filled with water during construction) if the walls of the pool are at least 4 feet above grade. Wallin felt that if a perimeter fence is already in place, there should be no need to construct a second fence around the pool. Staff was directed to check for State standards regarding pool fencing and make the recommended changes for further discussion at the September 27th meeting. PLANNER'S REPORT ON LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT NOTED Council briefly discussed the memorandum dated August 28, 19898 submitted by Susan Hoyt-Taff, regarding the Light Rail Transit Plan f or Ramsey County POLICING DISCUSSION RESUMED - CITY TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACT WITH ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT Some concern was expressed regarding terminating the long standing relationship with the Sheriff's Department; however, Council felt that a contract with Roseville might be more of a long range control on costs and that the Roseville proposal should be investigated. Wiessner was directed to negotiate a contract with the City of Roseville with the understanding that residents of both Falcon Heights and Roseville will receive the same service at the same per capita cost. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:27 P.M. Tom Baldwin, Mayor ATTEST: Shirley Chenoweth, City Clerk CITY OF TALCOK SEICSTS PUBLIC HEARING 7:30 P.M. r I.Eenda Item: D-1 MeetinS Datt:9/27/89 ITEM DESCRIPTION: DELINQUENT UTILITY CHARGES HEARING SUBMITTED EY: Tom Kelly AEViEi~ED sY: fl0?I.ANATION/SL1liMARY (attach addltioasl sbeets as necessary): See attached assessment roll. All attached properties are at least two months late (due July 31st) and all have received two notices (2nd quarter bill and public hearing notice). Property owners have until October 10 to pay the delinquent charges without it being placed on their tax statement. ACTION REQUESTED: I No.R-89-21 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS C O U N C I L R E S O L U T I O N Date September 27 , 1 989 A RESOLUTION RELATING TO LEVYING SPECIAL ASS ESSMENTS FOR DELINQUENT SEWER CHARGES Res olved, that 1.It is hereby determined that there are delinquent sewer charges against the properties hereinafter set for th, in' the amounts set forth opposite the description of such properties; 2.A special assessment in the amount hereinafter set forth is hereby levied against each of such tracts, with an interest rate of eight percent annually, respectively; 3.A total amount of such special assessment, in each case, shall be payable with the 1989 real estate taxes d ue and payable during 1990; 4.The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified cop y of the assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County and such assessment shall be col]_ected and paid over into the same manner as other municipal taxes; 5. Tracts of land and the amount of such special assessments are as follows: (see attached) 6. The Delinquent Sewer assessment roll total is $3,735.13. Moved by Approved by YEAS Nays BALDWIN CIERNIA CHENOWETH WALLIN BUSH in Favor Against Mayor September 27, 1989 Date Attested by City Clerk September 27, 1989 Date Adopted by Council September 27 , 1989 UNPAID SEWER CHARGES FOR ASSESSMENTS AS OF 9/21/89 AMOUNT NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 58.32 Ivy Johnson 15-29-23-34-0060 1701 Albert Street Sub. to Albert St. The So. 63' Falcon Heights, MN 55113 of N. 1113 ft E 166.3 ft. W 1/2 of SE 1/4 of SW I/4 27.77 Gordon Traux 15-29-23-34-0040 1776 Albert Street S 52 50/100 ft of W 1/2 Falcon Heights, MN 55113 of Lot 1, Larpenteur Villas 128.90 OKsana Yonan 15-29-23-31-0022 1892 Albert Street Lot 3, Block 1, Klatts Addition Falcon Heights, MN 55113 128.90 Charles Larson 15-29-23-33-0072 1725 Arona Street Lot 14, Block 6, Falcon Heights Addn. Falcon Heights, MN 55113 128.90 Eric Jorve 15-29-23-32-0097 1864 Arona Street W. 1/2 of Vac. Alley adj. of Lot 20 Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Block 2, Falcon Heights Addition 30.55 David Black 15-29-23-32-0032 1887 Arona Street Lot 5, Block 2, Juhl's Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Roselawn Addition 128.90 Albert Kolmer 5-29-23-33-0077 1732 Asbury Street W. 1/2 of Vac. Alley adj & Fol. Falcon Heights, MN 55113 S. 2 ft of Lot 20 and all of lot 19, Block 6, Falcon Heights Addition 27.77 Douglas Nyman 15-29-23-33-0086 1790 Asbu Street.ry Lot 28, Block 6, Falcon Hei hts9 Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Addition 128.90 Howard Smeby 15-29-23-33-0089 1801 Asbury Lot I, Block 2, Ke].1ers Falcon Falcon Heights, MN 551I3 Heights 58.32 Thomas Dashiell 5-29-23-32-0048 1861 Asbury Street Lot 1, Block ]_, Kellers Falcon Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Heights 128.90 Wilbur Rogers 16-29-23-32-0008 1947 Autumn Street Lot 10, Block 1, Falcon Woods Fa]_con Heights, MN 55113 128.90 Jack Fisher 22-29-23-21-0078 1396 California Avenue Falcon Hei hts MN 55108 Lot 11, Block 4, Northome g 2- AMOUNT NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 27.77 Donna Trethewey 22-29-23-21-0037 1437 California Lot 17, Block 2, Northome Falcon Heights, MN 55108 128.90 Edward Sainoski 22-29-23-22-0009 1507 West California Ely 50 ft of Lot 1, Block 13, Falcon ~ieights, MN 55108 Northome 3rd Addition 27.77 Collin McAllister 22-29-23-22-0008 1513 California Avenue Ex. Ely 50 ft. of Lot 1, Block 13, Falcon Heights, MN 55108 Northome 3rd Addition 27.77 Wolfgang Taraba 20-29-23-11-0019 2160 Folwell Avenue Lot 4, Block 2, Adutior's Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Sub. #90 128.90 Bill Johnson 16-29-23-41-0018 1615 Garden Avenue Lot 6, Block 1, Maple Knoll Addn. Falcon Heights, MN 55113 27.77 Ian Bain _16-29-23-41-0025 1626 Garden Avenue Lot 4, Block 2, Maple Knoll Addn. Falcon Heights, MN 55113 31.47 W.W. Rooke 15-29-23-34-0007 1771 Hamline Avenue N 1/2 of lot 2, Larpenteur Villas Falcon Heights, MN 55113 62.39 Robert Westlund 15-29-23-34-0004 1781 Hamline Avenue N 52 5/10 ft of S 157 5/10 ft of E 1/2 Falcon Heights, MN 55113 of Lot 1 „ Larpenteur Villas 128.90 Cynthia Koecher 21-29-23-11-0011 1625 Hollywood Court E 17 ft of Lot ]_2 and all of lot 11 Falcon Heights, MN 55108 Block 21, Crossroads Court 169.56 Ernest Kutzik 15-29-23-31-0042 1910 Holton Street Lob 2, Block 15, Midway Plains Falcon Heights, MN 55113 35.26 Lawrence Jorissen 22-29-23-21-0157 1419 Hoyt Avenue W 30 ft of Lot 27 and all of Lot 26 Falcon Heights, MN 55108 Block 7, Cables Hamline Heights Addn. 27.77 Joseph Neglia 22-29-23-22-0]_32 1463 Hoyt Avenue Lot 12, Block 7, Northome 2nd Addn. Falcon Heights, MN 55108 128.90 Owner/Occupant 22-29-23-21-0089 1341 West Idaho Avenue Lot 22, Block 4, Northome Falcon Heights, MN 55108 27 77 Michael Dickerman 22-29-23-21-0115 1412 Idaho Avenue Lot 3, Block 6, Northome Falcon Heights, MN 55108 30.55 William Mosier 1464 West Idaho Falcon Heights, MN 55108 22-29-23-22-0062 E 5 ft of Lot 14 and all of Lot 13, Block 11, Northome 2nd Addn. 3- AMOUNT NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 128.90. Robert Tramel 22-29-23-22-0032 1505 Idaho Ex W 85 ft. Lot 1 & ex. E 65 ft. Falcon Heights, MN 55]_08 Lot 2, Block 12 „ Northome 3rd Addn. 169.56 Owner/Occupant 22-29-23-21-0111 1349 Iowa Avenue Lot 21, Block 5, Northome Falcon Heights, MN 55108 58.32 Owner/Occupant 22-29-23-21-0164 1358 Iowa Avenue E 9 ft of Lot 8 and all of lot 7 Falcon Heights, MN 55108 Block 8, Cables Hamline Heights Addn. 58.31 David Wickdem 22-29-23-22-0092 1537 Iowa Avenue E 36 ft of Lot 4 and a_11 of Lot 3 Falcon heights, MN 55108 Block 10 Northome 2nd Addn. 27.77 L.J. Chadwick 15-29-23-34-0022 1365 West Larpenteur S 50 ft of W 100 ft of Lot 7 and E Falcon Heights, MN 55113 100 ft of Lots 8 and 9, Larpenteur Villas 128.90 Robert Olson 22-29-23-21-0009 1386 West Larpenteur Avenue Ex. E 34 ft, Lot 11 and E. 37 2/10 Falcon Heights, MN 55113 ft of Lot 12, Block 1, Northome 58.32 Grace Lai 16-29-23-34-0088 1893 West Larpenteur Common Area .Interest in Lot 6, Block ]_ Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Attributable & Lot 3, Block 1, Falcon Ridge Estates 24.20 Owner/Occupant 16-29-23-33-0003 2061 West Larpenteur Falcon Heights, MN 55113 30.55 John Ryan 15-29-23-31-~004~ 1444 West Roselawn W 44 72/100 ft of S 75 ft & Ex W Falcon Heights, MN 55113 24 4/10 ft of Lot 2 and W 10 ft of Lot ]., Block 1, Barthel Villas 58.32 27.77 27.77 27.77 Gregory Clarson 15-29-23-31-0007 1878 Sheldon Street Lot 6, Block 3, Klatts Addition Falcon Heights, MN 55113 #2 Tony Weber 1770 Simpson Street Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Raymond Johnson 1810 Simpson Street Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Michael Pitz1 1858 Simpson Street Falcon Heights, MN 55113 15-29-23-33-0025 Lot 25, Block 8, Falcon Heights Addn. 15-29-23-32-0]_08 Lot 11, Block 1, Falcon Heights Addition 15-29-23-32-0116 Ijo~t .19, &icick' 1, Falcon Heights Addition AMOUNT 61.38 128.90 128.90 16.58 373.40 83.03 3,735.13 NAME AND ADDRESS -4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Janet Brown 15-29-23-32-0018 1887 Simpson Lot 5, Block 4, Juhl's Roselawn Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Addition #3 John Webster 15-29-23-32-0057 1850 North Snelling Lot 1, Block 1, fellers Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Falcon Heights Bobby Thomas 16-29-23-44-0046 1703 St. Marys Street Lot 28, the Crossroads Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Robert O'Connell 17XX St. Marys Street Falcon Heights, MN 55113 North Star Pizza Corp. 1552 Larpenteur Avenue Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Stratford Investments 1781 North Prior Avenue Falcon Heights, MN 55113 16-29-23-44-0040 Lot 28, The Crossroads 22-29-23-22-0060 RLS #2 16-29-23-33-0012 Lot 1, Block 1, Stratford Professional Park TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL Consent x L Policy CITY OF PALCON HEIGHTS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: DISBURSEMENTS Tom Kelly EXPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary): a) Disbursements through 9/27/89, $52,382.35 b) Payroll, 9/1/89 - 9/15/89, $11,098.57 ACTION REQUESTED: P ~ Agenda Item: E-1 ._' Meeting Date: 9/27/89 Approval H z O OOOO~OMOOOO~r10u'10~000OO~n.-1o0~nu~ONM0000N 000ONOOO~~tOMO000~70a0000~O~t~pO~~tnOu~ppO ~T000'--I OO ~MdN~OOU1'-INapNOu'1u'1NO~11~~pp~pOppp~MCT~NO~ON~t O~YOrl.7OO •M N ~O N N ~ 00 N n N Vl r-I O ,-{ r•~ N N ~O N O~ N t!~ pp N ~7 O 1~ '•{ V~ l!1 NV} rl ~O O~ M I~ a0 N r-1 1~ N M r-1 MNONN T N u'1 rl N b0 t'. 1 o ~ ro x ai i o G o 0 CG p G H o ~ 's'v vin v H W N a N NN ~O rl ro U a~ N a)m ro m C+ JJ S-i N ~ to ctf N u1 R~ ~a ` v 3a N U ro l l 41 QJ rlar4-1 ro v~G G o~a~v~ a~ ro a~co v •~ u oooa o po u~~,o v u v a +~b a~ ~+ ~ ro v a~ •~ va 'd o v b a~ ro o a •~ u J.,v ai ai oz w v po m u m a~ •~ a o u a~ a~ G u a~ v v u •~ o b 4J a1 p0 N N ~ra G b0 A ror ir JJ r I b N GJ N 3%i ~v N N J~i ~IvnvIU1 ~.+ u o,i ~ R ~+ 41 F+G G O ~..~ 41 3-i ~+J.1 S-+dl r aD C roxu, ro w~~a a u ro~ao a o~ u v o i~ u., o v i o o a oo au~ v a o•~ ro o f u i aro o v w o o v H o o~o v o •~+ o o v o r-~o u o v ,-~ cy J. G v ro o G o 0 0 a o A •-+ W aaa z wd dv~zoaw xz=z o w E-+w~Hr~z v,z o a~ .c c~c~a o •~ o ro ,a o ro U .~ ~ ~ a •~ •~ o +, oxUU O y ~ ~ ~ ~v a ~ ~ aH a~ ~d ~-C •av•~ u ~ ~+ ~, o •~ •~ m ~ ,~o ~ ~ .~0 ro00 +~ v G o v o i ° ~' v ~ wa ro ,.'vcau~vv ro a z Q o~ro a,v o u bu~cqu idDf~+0 3~ ~ b J •~ v ~+-~x u d i~3 x cn•o ~nvi~o i G ui aivvUyvd ~~ o ao 0 w cn o cn •~ v o ro +.~o ~, v o G 0 o JJ x ao ~ 3 cn ~ O ° •~ >i o o v ~ 3cnHcvdw ° ~ ~ 3+~•~c~•~ ~+ ro ro ~o3a x ao ~ ~ ~z,-i,-i v •~.o ro m a ~ u ~+~ ro +.~ •~ ~ a ~ ~w ~ H w a a•~,n cn u oroornHH•,a~°~~a~.coro•~+rov•,~u ov~rowwroro a~+~° •~roxE•+.-+~dd~dcar~aahc~cSx~~Gt••ara~~zzAaa+xa~ncacnv~pr~hA a W z z U O 1~ a0 C1 O r-I N M ~7 u'1 ~O I~ 00 ~ O •--I N M may' u1 ~ n a0 01 O ri N M ~t t/1 ~O 1~ O O~ OMMMM7 ~7 ~t ~t ~t ~7 ~t ~7 ~t ~t v1 u 1 u'1 t!'1 tl'1 u"W 1 tr1 u 1 u1 u1 ~ ~p ~p ~p ~O ~o ~O ~O ~ ~O I~r~~~~nt~~~~r~~r~i~r~r~r~~~x r~~r~t~~~~r~~r~r~N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NU N N N N N N N N N N N N NNNNNNcJNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 14 Sep 1989 Raid Register Page 1Thu9:01 AM City of Falcon Heights Pay PaykEmployeeEmployeePayGroupGroup CheckrNumberNamePeriodNumberDescriptionCheckAmountDate Status 017769 017770 0 0 0.00 15-5ep-89 VOID 017771 OC2 Wiessner, Janet R. 017772 000000004 Kriegler Carol J 17 01 semi-monthly 0.00 15-5ep-89 VOID 1,165.24 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 017773 0000011 Chenoweth, Shirley G. 17 U1 17 01 semi-monthly 4t~.14 15-Sep-89 Dutstamiing 017774 (h70U0dU20 Yverson, Terry D.17 01 semi monthly semi-manthiy 739,21 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 850.48 15-5ep-89 Outstanding017775000000027Morgan, Jay M. 017776 000000035 Zimmerman Katherine 17 01 semi-monthly 687.33 i5-Sep-89 Outstanding 017777 000000038 Wright, Vincent D. 0 77 17 01 17 01 semi-as7nthly semi-monthly 332.37 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 793,63 15-5ep-89 Outstanding178000000041Neumann, Kristine L. 017779 000000063 Phillips, Patricia A. 17 01 17 0 semi-monthly 246.98 15-5ep-89 Outstanding 017780 000000065 Kelly, Thomas R. 4177 1 17 01 semi-monthly semi-monthly 112.66 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 802.69 15-Sep-89 Dutstandi»g81000000066Bogenholm, Garin W. 017782 000000[I68 Suppes Jean 17 01 semi-monthly 96.58 15-5ep-89 Outstaring 017783 000000075 PICKA, GEORGE I7 U1 17 semi-monthly 41.39 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 017784 000000079 Hoyt Taff, Susan L. 017 01 17 01 semi-monthly semi-monthly 320.26 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 385.17 15-Sep-89 Outstanding785000000003Baumann, Nicholas B. 017786 000000005 Berndt Ross -9 02 monthly 1 343.30 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 017787 000000006 Bianchi, David P. 9 02 9 02 monthly 1 monthl 1 203.76 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 96 88017788000000007Bianchi, Joseph D. 0 9 02 y monthly 1 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 49.38 !5-Sep-89 Outstandin17789000000008Brown, Raymond F. 017790 000000013 Ciarkin Michael D 9 02 morhhly 1 g 260.51 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 017791 000040014 Dow, Michael J. 9 02 9 02 monthly 1 monthl 1 151.38 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 275 33 1592OOOO00015Dowdeli, Ralph L.9 02 y monthly 1 5ep-89 Outstanding 46.88 15-Sep-89 Outstanding93000000016Fuller, James D. 017794 000000018 Holmgren Jahn M. Sr 9 02 monthly 1 77.50 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 017795 000000021 KurhaJetz, Clement M. 01779 9 02 9 02 monthly 1 monthly 1 201.88 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 219.38 15-Sep-89 Outstandin6000000022LeMay, Dennis G. 017797 000000023 LeMay Dougias 9 02 tenthly 1 g 123.88 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 017798 000000024 Lirig, Lea 9 02 9 02 monthly 1 monthl 1 69.63 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 144 66017799000000025McDermor, Ciry K. 01780G 9 02 y monthly 1 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 25.UO 15-Sep-89 Outstandin000000026McNabb, Gerald 017801 040000029 Olson, Joseph E. 9 02 monthly 1 g 103.76 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 017802 000000032 Schaefer, Richard A. 017803 0 9 02 9 02 monthly 1 monthly 1 86.88 15-5ep-89 Outstanding 71.26 15-Sep-89 Outstandin000000335chauffert, Craig F. 017804 000000034 Smida 6ai1 9 02 monthly 1 g 71.26 15-5ep-89 Outstanding 017805 000000039 Morgan, JaY 9 02 9 02 monthly 1 31,25 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 017806 000000040 Kayser, Douglas 017807 9 02 monthly ! monthly 1 103.26 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 217.01 15-Sep-89 Outstandin000000042Stolz, Steven P. 017808 000040045 Gilbert Jerome J 9 02 tenthly 1 g 86.88 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 017809 000000046 Holmgren, John H. Jr. 9 02 9 02 monthly 1 215.27 15-Sep-89 Outstanding G17810 000000047 McNabb, Kevin 01781 9 02 monthly 1 monthly i 171.38 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 101.25 15-Sep-89 Outstandin1000000049Anderson, Kevin L. 017812 0000004 PETERSON, GREGORY S. 9 02 monthly 1 g 296.50 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 0178!3 040000069 Martinez, Joseph L. 9 Q2 9 02 monthly 1 monthly 1 51.25 15-Sep-89 Outstanding 221.88 15-Sep-89 Outstanding r Total 11,098.57 l~, Sep 1989 Paid Register Page 2Thu9:G1 RM City of Faicon Heights User initials AJR Payroll Thursday 14 Septeaaber 1989 9:GI AM Start 9:01 AM Finish Buffer Na~we CheckNistary Records Read ii21 Rerords Selected 45 Nu~aber of Pages p elected by Pay Group NuMber Nat Equal To 3 And Check Date Equal Ta 15-Sep-89AndCheckNu:aber Equal Tv And Check Nua:ber Equal Ta Sorted by Check Nueber No Totals No Page Breaks Consent x Policy ITEM DESCRIPTION: SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: Agenda Item: E-2 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS Meeting Date: 9/27/89 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ' CANCELLATION OF CHECK #22713 Tom Kelly ERPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary); Check #22713 was issued 9/11/89 to Dale Kielsmeier in the amountof $4.00 wa-s incorrect . ACTION REQUESTED: Cancel check #22713 Consent x Policy ITEM DESCRIPTION: SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: CITY OF PALCON HEIGHTS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION COMMISSION MINUTES Various Commissions Shirley Chenoweth EXPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary): Agenda Item: E-3 Meetiag Date: 9/27/89 a)Park and Recreation Commission Minutes of August 28,1989 b)Solid Waste Commission Minutes of September 7, 1989 ACTION REQUESTED: i August 29, 1989 Minutes of the Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting6:30 P.M., Tuesday, August 29, 1989 Present: Linda McLoon, Connie Lasser, Jyneen Thatcher, Jeff Johnson, Sue Gehrz, JeanSuppes, Lloyd Jacobson, Sr. Representative, Pat Bush, City Council Representative, CarolKreigler, Park Director. Absent: Michael Smallpage 1. Falcon Heights School Playground Equipment Committee Request Kirsten Eckberg, representative of the F.H. School lapresentationontheircurrentstatusintheirfundraising. They ha~e raised a ittee gave a6,200 earmarked for handica pproximatelyandprivateorganizationdonatpions. aTheybwere requesting $7 OOOOfOrom the cht f ofdraisersHeights. Kirsten indicated to cost of specific pieces of the la y Falcon indicated that it might be a good idea for the city to buy specif cnd equipment. Jyneen equipment rather than less tangible items, such as pea gravel. When asked whetheg therewasanyassurancefromtheschooldistrictabout-the school being put up for sale, Kirstenindicatedthatthedistricthadnoplanstoselltheschoolandhadbeentoldforthenext10yearstheplansintheschooldistrictindicatedtheschoolwouldbeinuse. Kirsten saidthattheschooldistrictwasgoingtopayforinstallationoftheequipmentandhadalsocontributed $5,000 for handicapped accessibility pieces. The school district would alsoretaintheliabilityfortheequipmentandmaintainthewholestructure. Linda asked whytheFalconHeightsPTAhadnotgivenabigdonationtotheplayground, since it was theirschool. Kirsten said that the whole issue only came up after the budget had been preparedforlastyear. For the current year the PTA pledged anything over their operating budgetof $1,600 to go towards the playground equipment. After Kirsten left, it was generally agreed upon that the city should contributesomethingtothisfacility. This is the only playground "Heights, and the only way to serve this area of the population) wouldt be to esu of Falcon playground. Several options were presented by Linda, who indicated we could su port thisthespiralslideandspiralslidesection, for $4,800, or include the accessor pport just6,586, or also include .the step section for a total of $7,261. If the latter course was takenrifforsomereasontheschoolwassold, the equipment would be able to stand alone andthereforecouldbemovedtoanothersite. Jeff felt uncomfortable about one taxing unitdonatingmoneytoanotherseparatetaxingunit. Carol indicated that the city attorney saidthattherewerenolegalreasonswhythistypeofthingcouldn't be done. Little Canada wassupportingagymandotherequipmentfortheelementaryschoolinLittleCanada, andRosevillewasdoingthesamethingforschoolsinRoseville. Lloyd expressed concern oftheSeniorsheknewthatallthismoneyexpenditurewouldresultinhighertaxesandthatwouldpossiblyforcepeopletomovefromFalconHeights. He did see the need for thisequipmentintheareaandsaidthatanumberofFalconeershaddonatedtothefundraisingefforts. Pat asked how much had been spent by the city for similar equipment in otherparks. The average in the past several years had been between $3,000 and 4,000. Maybe weshouldlimitourcontributiontoasimilaramount. Once again it was brought up that to Minutes 2 serve this area of the city, the school playground was really the only area which could beupgradedeffectively. There was little else that the city could do the improve the "parksiteattheschool. We then voted. The unanimous decision was to request the City CouncilsupporttheFalconHeightsplaygroundforthefull $7,261 with the proviso that the schooldistrictgivesomeassurancesthattheschoolwouldremainopenandtheequipmentaccessibletoeveryone. Pat added that she felt it would have been more in keeping withexpendituresatotherparksitestoonlysupport $4,800 of the equipment. We all agreedthatweshouldcontacttheSchoolDistrictandindicatetothemthatinthefuturewewouldexpectthemtocommunicateinamoretimelyfashiontheirupcomingneedsandrequestssothattheycouldbebudgetedforandincludedinourparkplanningefforts. We were alluncomfortablewiththe "pressured" nature of the request when we were in the throes ofparkplanning. We felt we should have advance notice so that we could plan effectively inthefuture. Carol said she would discuss this with the proper people at the school. Lindaindicatedshewouldwritearecommendationtothecitycounciltosupporttheplayground,listing specific equipment purchases, to a total of $7,261. Carol indicated that there wasover $10,000 in the Capitol Improvement budget for the current year. This money hadbeenearmarkedforIdahoandSnellingregradingandsewerpipes, but Jan had informedCarolthatthismoneywouldcomeoutofotherfundsthatweresupposedtobeforthosepurposes. Thus we felt we could use come of the capitol improvement money for thispurchase. 2. Park Plan Carol felt that the commission should make a recommendation to the City CounciltoadoptthecurrentParkPlan. Everyone agreed unanimously that we should make thisrecommendation. Linda said she would write the appropriate letter. 3. Community Park Building A general discussion of the park building was held. Those who had not seen it wereabletogetagoodlookatthemockupandfloorplansoftheproposedparkbuilding. Thequestionofwhetherthebuildingwouldhavesufficientoccupancywasraised. 48 couldpicnicundertheroofoutsideandCarolthoughtanother34or36couldpicnicintheinterior. We reiterated the need for more window area on the skating rink side, removal ofthedecorativewoodbeamsontherestroomside, and adding a door so that the picnic areawouldbemoreeasilyconnectedtothekitchenfacilities. The bathrooms would be lockable.Whenever programmed activities were going on at the park, the bathrooms would be open.A satellite would still be placed at the park for use at other times. There appears to be nootherwaytopreventvandalism. Carol indicated that the aluminum bleachers had beenstolenfromtheCommunityParkthispastmonth. Everyone was appalled. We thenunanimouslyagreedtorecommendtotheCityCouncilthattheycontinuetoproceedwiththecurrentplansfortheparkbuildingasdrawnupbyBuetowandAssociates. Thecurrentestimatedcostforthebuildingwas $170,000 - 190,000. Carol reminded us that thiswasfromthedriplineinanddidnotincludesidewalks, landscaping, picnic tables etc.Linda indicated that she would write an appropriate letter to the City Council of ourrecommendations. 4. Acquisition of University-Owned Park Property Carol said that it had come to the attention of Jan Wiessner that the University maybeinterestedinsellingtheCommunityParkandGardenParkpropertiestothecity. Pataskedifwehadanyideahowlongourleasescouldbeextended. Carol didn't know, butsaidshewouldfindout. Carol said that our original estimates of the value of the land at 1milliondollarswasprobablywaytoohigh, because the land had to stay parkland andthereforehadlimitedsalepotential. Jan thought the land was probably worth $300,000 -500,000. We all agreed that it was crazy to buy something we could use for free. Carolindicatedthatwepay $1 per year to lease the property. The discussion was tabled until Minutes 3 Carol could find out how long our leases could be extended. 5. Budget Carol has started work on the Capitol Improvement budget plan for the next 5 years.She is basing her figures on the end table in our Park Plan, using Scott's suggestions forexpendituresperyear. It was generally agreed that until we knew how realistic the figureswere, it was too early to begin to prioritize expenditures. We all agreed, however, to gowiththefiguresfromourParkPlan. We are already at work on the firstImprovementplanofrebuildingourparkbuildingattheCommunityPark, and cost awe~enotyearfinalized. Carol explained the new accounting system being set up by the city. The Parksbudgetwillconsistofthreeparts. First, the Capitol Improvements budget, theadministrativebudget (which includes things like Carol's salary, postage, utilities and thelike), and lastly, a programs budget. This last will give a better cost accounting of the costofeachindividualprogramandtherevenueitgenerates. This will help us plan more costeffectiveprogramminginthefuture. The general discussion indicated that we were allcomfortablelettingsomeprogramshelppayforothers, and that just because a program wasmoreexpensivetorunshouldn't mean that it wouldn't be offered. Linda asked howcomparableourprogramfeesweretothoseofthesurroundingcommunities. Carol and Patbothindicatedthattheywereonthelowside. We were all pleased at the new budgetsystem. Carol indicated that she would continue working on it. 6. Fall Programs Carol-said she had started working on the Fall Programs, which would be sent homewithchildrenalongwithinformationonafter-school activities run by the school district.Carol said the programming would be largely the same as last year, since everything wentsowell. 7. Center for Community Studies Jyneen had information, which she passed around, on a program at the Center forCommunityStudiesattheUniversityofMinnesotawherestudentsusedparksaspartofclassroomprojectsorthesisprojects. She felt it might be an inexpensive way to get a largenumberoflandscapingplansforanyparksitewewanted. She felt it would be especiallyusefulforGardenorLindigparksites, which are currently totally undeveloped. Lindaaskedifwecouldn't get these services free from landscaping firms, since it representedlargeamountsofpotentialpurchases. Carol said she would find out. We all agreed thattheprogramwasworthpursuing, especially as the university is juxtaposed physically toFalconHeights. 8. 9:30 p.m. meeting was adjourned. Solid Waste Commission MeetingSeptember7, 1989 e meeting was called to order by Chairperson Thompson at 7:15 pm. ODMMISSION MEN~II~.S PRE5ETIT: Michael Haglund, Leo Rlisch,Laura Kuettel, Marty McCleary, John Zhompson and Shirley Chenoweth. CDMMISSIUN MEN~E~tS NC1T PRFSII~T: John Hustad, Diane Rlisch, Nancy Misra,Terry Iverson, and Lyle Wray. The agenda for the meeting was approved by consensus, The minutes of the last meeting were approved with a motion byMichaelHaglund, seconded by Marty McCleary after corrections were made toMartyMcCleery's name and Metropolitan Council replaced Ramsey County MetroCouncilinwording. CONIl~DSTIlQG: Shirley Chenoweth with be meeting with Susan Hoyt Taff, CityPlanner, to discuss the Commission's suggestions for canpost related revisionstotheordinance, Michael Haglund suggested defining the length of a can ststructuretoclarifypresentdefinitions. Shirley Chenoweth discussed ~removing "side yards" fran the present ordinance for a canposting site and thelastsentenceof9-4.01 Subd. 3 Permitted Accessory Uses. (The canpost areaorstructureshallnotbelocatedsothatseepagefromthecanpostwillrunoffintopublicorprivatestreets, storm sewers, or drainage ditches.) Itwasalsosuggestedthatthematerialstobeusedtobuildacanpostingstructurenotbelimitedto "wood and/or wire screen." John ~anpson suggested the Cammission use space in the next newsletter todefinetheconditionsrequiredforindividualcanpostingsites. Shirley Cnenoweth responded to the question of sharing leaf collection withthecityoafRoseville. Roseville is not interested in expanding theirpickup. The approximate purchase price of $90,000 per truck is prohibitiveforthecityofFalconHeights. Questions were raised regarding the exact wording, information and guidelinesthatacompostsitemustfollowaccordingtotheUniversityofMinnesota.Shirley Chenoweth will bring that information to the next Commission meeting. Leo Rlisch suggested the city provide a site where residents could bring theirgrassclippingsandleavestobeprocessed }~, a ~Pactor. Shirley Chenowethexplainedthereisnositeavailable. John Thompson will have the addressesofalleanpostingsitesinRamseycountyforthenextmeeting. The issue of brush disposal, which is not acre le fornotbeenresolved. ptab canposting sites. has There were no attendees at the Ramsey County Fall Lawn Clinic. MINU'I~,S Solid Waste Ccnunission 7 September 1989 page two MEZROPOLITAN ~UNCIL REPORT: Marty McCleary gave an update on information hereceivedfrantheMetropolitanCouncil. He indicated the Metro Council isgoingtomakesanedecisionsforthecountieswhichwillgivetheFalconHeightsSolidWasteCcRrtnissionabettergraspofwhatisavailablewhenmakingourrecommendations. Marty McCleary will keep us posted regardingMetroCouncildecisions. BIN PROGRAM: Shirley Chenaweth informed the Catsnission that bin sales arelow. Use of bins throughout the neighborhoods is most likely the bestadvertising. She also mentioned that Roseville has shown interest in the bins. FUNDING: The county is providing $3000 to Falcon Heights for curbside pickupand $300 for public education. Shirley Chenaweth discussed the 1990 budget which is $43,049. Zhe increasesoverthepreviousyearshowingmainlyinrecyclingpickup, properdisseminationofsalariesandthenewsletter. Shirley Chenoweth will applyforagrantfor $31,000. e budget does include-monies for the recognition program. LICENSING RDQUIRII~1'15 ; Copies of the present licensing requirements ofFalconHeightswereavailable. Shirley Chenoweth informed the Canmission thattherenewalforlicensingisinJanuaryandifchangesaretobemadethemonthofNwenberisourtargetdate. If the Ca~unission requests lioensing to reflect pickup of recyclables, brush,yard waste and garbage Leo Klisc~ suggested that if several haulers qualifytheresidentsmaychoosetheirownhaulerandleavethecityoutofthebillingprocess. Zhis retains some freedan for the resident to select ahauler. John Thanpson and Michael Haglund have copies of ordinances for Disposal ofGarbageandCompostingfranseveralcatununities. fey will compile anyinformationwhichmightassisttheCarnnissioninreviewingtheordinances forFalconHeights. 13~e meeting was adjourned at 9 : 40pm. Respectfully sutmitted, Laura Ruettel, Secretary 1 Coast ;at X Policy ITEM DESCRIPTION: SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: Agenda Item: E-4 CITY OF PALCON REIGHTS Meeting Date: 9/27/89 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Licenses Katherine J. Zimmerman Shirley Chenoweth PLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary): General Contractor Anderson-Johnston Construction, Inc. #371 NEW8200HillTrail Lake Elmo, MN 55042 ACTION REQUESTED: Approval Consent Agenda Item: F-1 Policy x CITY OF PALCON HEIGHTS Meeting Date: 9 27/89 YEQUEST YOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: FIRE DEPARTMENT FUND RAISING DISCUSSION SIIBMITTED 8Y: Jay McNabb ggpl~ gy; Jan Wiessner PLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary): The attached memorandum from-Jay McNabb explains that the CityFireDepartmentcannotacquirepermissiontoconductaonedayfundraiserasitdoesnotmeettherequirementsofbeinganon-profit charitable organization so the Relief Associationisproposingtoconductthefundraiserandpurchaseequipmentwiththeproceeds. I think we have to consider whether theReliefAssociationwouldhavetousethebiddingrequirementsofthecityintheirpurchases. Jay also would like the Council to discuss the Fire Department°sfundraisingactivitiesingeneral. About a year ago the FireDepartmentwastoldtheycouldraisefundseitherthrough .theReliefAssociationortheCityFireDepartment, however, it mustbeclearwhichorganizationisconductingit, who the checksshouldbepayabletoandwhatthefundswouldbeusedfor.Many checks were previously made out to the City of FalconHeightsFireDepartmentbutwerenotdepositedorusedbytheCity.) Attached is a flyer the Relief Association used in 1988. ACTIOT REQiTESTED: 88-6 I. 2077 West Larpenteur Avenue Sept. 21, 1989 Falcon Heights Fire Department Relief Association Falcon Heights, Minnesota 55113 Ms. Jan Wiessner Re: Fund raising dinner at the Knights of Columbus Dear Jan: 612) 644-5575 I apologize for not being able to attend the last Council meeting,- where this subject came up for consideration. It is my understanding that the City is expecting our application for exemption to be done in the name of the Fire Dept. and not the Relief Association. Unfortunately, the Fire Dept., as part of the city, does not qualify under the charitable gambling statutes to have a gambling license, even a temporary one. These statutes specifically require these licenses to be issued to non-profit organizations only, such as the Relief Association. Thus, if we are going to be able to hold this function at all, it must be done under the auspices of the Relief Association, and not the Fire Dept. I confirmed this with phone conversations with the Knights of Columbus, the Charitable Gambling Commission, and the City of Roseville, all on 9/21/89. It is my further understanding that one of the concerns that the Council had was with our intentions regarding the proceeds we receive from this event. In the application form itself, we state that the entire amount of the proceeds are going to be used for equipment. We i~ will have to keep separate records for this entire event, and submit them to the IRS, the State Auditor's Office, and the Charitable Gambling Commission. Thus, the Relief Association will be held accountable for the disposition of the proceeds. The Fire Dept. will select the equipment, and the Relief Association will purchase the equipment, then donate it directly to the Fire Dept. Finally, we are requesting with this letter that the Council give us some specific direction .with respect to future fund-raising activities. Approximately one year ago we were requested to channel all such activities through our Relief Association. We agreed to do so, and at some time and expense to our members, we adjusted our activities. Mow we are sensing that there is some sentiment among the Council to change back, i.e. to put those activities back under the direction of the Fire Dept. We are now set up to run these activities through the Relief Association, and will continue to do so; if you or the Council feel otherwise, please let us know at the Council Meeting, and we will discuss it at that time. Sincerely, V G~~ y McNabb surer Q' ~ A m- c.~ Minnesota Charitable Gambling o c a a ~~~ For Office Use OnlyApplicationforExemptionfrom o Charitable Gambling Licensemm- m Fill in the unshaded portions o/ this application for exemppon and send it in at least 45 days be/ore your gambling activity for processing. Name and Address o Or anization Organizati n currenvprevious license number currenvprevious exempt number Street Ciry State Zip code ounry Z ~ 7 7 ~ L.; c C'r~rti-~vC' ~' -~ ~a I~ r,/t 1-~ TC i'~'1.-- ~_~11 ? ~a_YYI.SGC~ Chief executive officer Phone IOl3R~"1" i ~G~ SU r~ f` Phone N Years in existence U~ .Attach proof of three years or more of existence. Number of active members ~ ~ Fraternal ^ Religious ^ Veterans Other non-profit I_ f ypu checked box for other nonprofit, check one of the following and attach proof of nonprofit status f~'~{IRS designation ^ Incorporated with Secretary of State ^ Affiliate of parent nonprofit organization (charter) i ~ G tom/ 1~~'t~f ,L~ ~ ~ ~a I ~ Street j City Lp State Zip code Countyr°1 ~ ! ~ ~ n ~ ~ t~ ~C. ~S~Y; ~f~, i~'vltl ~~di Z ~T nn ~_~ c~ Gambling Site Name of site where activity will take place Date(s) of 1lypes of Games ~ Ftinancial Report caame lies No Gmss racstpis Expenses, lncfud~g Cost: of Prizes Net profit MaricaY Yalua of Prizes Bingo Raffles T~ Paddlewheels Tipboards I Pull-tabs Q Clo~w'} will prOTR De uSetl: I Distribptor from whom gambling equipment purchased fJ ~~ lPl r.~..S ~ C?"r {~Y~, it ~ f!~N7~ i'1`~ _ DistribrtoCS license number n f o+~clare all in/onna6on submitied to the Department o/Revenue I dec/are aA infvrmadorr submitted to the Department of Revenue is true, ac at a complete is true,: acrtlrats, and complete Chief utive officer's cure Date Ct-ief executive officer's signature Date Lbdai Govern ~.t AcknowIedgement I have received a copy of is application. This application will be reviewed by the Department of Revenue and will become effective 30 daysfromthedateofreceiptbythecityorcounty, unless the local government passes a resolution to specifically prohibit the activity. A copy of that resolution must be received by the Department of Revenue wlthln 30 days of the date filled in below. City or County Township city or county name Township name - ignature o person receiving app icatton ignature o person recelving app Icatlon eOerd Mail this application to:PiNc - Organ¢a6m Vdlew-Board reNne to Orga,izaYonro Department of Revenue -Gaming Divisioncanpsud,.dsd tie.. cad-Gn«~+nn Mail Station 3315 St. Paul, MN 55146-3315 FALCON HEIGHTS 5 DONATION Fundraiser Yflu are invited to participate in ourAnnual Fire Ball Fundraiserto beeldSATURDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 1988 at Bel Rae Ballroom inMoundsview. Unlike previous years, we will not be going door-to-door with our tickets. This year we askthatyoureturntheattachedenvelopewithyourdonationdirectlytothedepartment. Past donations have allowed your Volunteer Fire Department tocontinue itscommunity ser-vice in a modern and efficient manner. For instance YOU have allowed us to purchase tools such as: JAWS OF LIFE" .used to quickly and safely removeaccidentvictimsfromtheirautos Self-contained breathing apparatus) A-udio/Video Training equipment Uniforms Also, if you orany friends would be interested in serving your community with us, we haveseveralopeningsavailable. We provide all training, equipment and a retirement pension.For further information contact the Falcon Heights City Hall or drop a note in with yourdonation. Thank-you for your support, Falcon Heights Fire Department Bel Rae Ballrooms Consent Policy x ITEM DESCRIPTION: SMOKING POLICY SUBMITTED BY: Smoking Committee: r o- ' Agenda Item: F-2 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Meeting Date: 9 27/89 Carol Carlson, Gail Smida, Jay Morgan, Kitty Zimmerman REVIEFIED BY: Jan Wiesner EXPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary): The Smoking Committee recommends the attached po:l_icy. Based on tA,hisproposedpolicy, the City Hall facilities and vehicles would be non-smoking except for the Public Works Foreman's Office, the PublicWorksrestroom; the Fire Department apparatus room, training room,lounge, kitchen, dorm and office. The policy provides for an effective date of January a, 1990. AlsorecommendedbytheCommitteeisanon-site smoking cessation program oremployees--this probably would be through the American Lung Assn. Attachments: ACTION REQUESTED: 1) Survey Results 2) Memorandum from Smoking Committee to City Council dated September 18, 1989 3) Summary of Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act4) Smoking Policy dated September 18, 1989 Consider Smoking Policy for City. ATTACHMENT lA QUESTIONS 1. Are you a smoker? 2. If you are a smoker, would you quit smoking if the city funded or co- funded your participation in a smoking cessation program? 3. Would you prefer that smoking be permitted in the following: CITY HALL YES NO Lobby 13 22 Lunchroom S 26 Conference Room 5 31 Council Chambers 4 34 Office-General 4 33 Private 10 22 Restrooms 5 29 Storage Room 4 33 Vault 3 35 PARR BLDGS. Comm. Park Bldg.4 30 Idaho/Spelling Warming Souse)4 30 DON'T CARE 5 6 3 3 3 4 4 3 1 RESPONSES Ocassionally Quitter/ Not at Work Sometimes Yes 5 No 29 5 2 Maybe Yes 2 No 9 2 FIRE DEPT. Lounge Bay Dorm Training. Room Restrooms Vehicles N/A 11 YES NO DON'T CARE 11 16 ZI 9 21 8 7 24 8 8 24 S 7 23 9 4 28 6 PUB. WORRS 4 Storage Rooms 2 25 Office II 20 3 Bays 9 27 Restrooms 7 27 Vehicles 6 26 Mezzanine 7 25 7 6 7 7 6 ATTACHMENT 1B 4. How would you handle conflicts between smokersandnon-smokers in common shared spaces/areassuchasvehicles, etc. 5. Would you like to see an on-going EmployeeCommitteetoaddressemployeeconcerns? 6. If so, would you be willing to serve onsuchacommittee? Yes 24 No 14 Yes 11 No 21 Name Optional n r 4. CO'.~NTS ATTACHMENT a_C I find it disgusting you are considering turning me into a second classcitizenbecauseIsmoke. City funded or co-funding for a smoking cessation program would bebeneficial. It might earn lower insurance rates for city employees andstudieshavealsoshownsmokersareabsentmorefromworkandhavemoreillnesses. If employees stopped smoking, the city night even save money. Please have the meetings at time when more of us may attend. As a volunteer firefighter who normally works during the day at a regularfob, I feel the meetings during the daytise hours discriminate against thoseofuswhodoourcivicdutyatnight. I am unable to attend any meetingsduringthedaytimehoursunless....of coui'se....the city would like tocompensatemefor ~- time. i QUESTION 3 1. Should not allow smoking in unsupervised buildings. 2. Smokers have a right to smoke, but not at the ea~pense of ~y healthorrightsnottobreathsmoke--this may mean dividing times, as well a8properventilation. Outside smoking en city property is o.k. with me i.f smoker does notdropbuttsonground. designated smoking area outside of City Hall and other citT buildingsw'O~d ~~ cosply ~ ~ belief to attain or somply to l[innesotan~sKoko-I'~'®e e~ironment in the workplace. mat about safety. Vault is fireproof with. no ventilation. Storageareascouldhavetlamableswhichmightbeconsidered. QUESTION 5 I don't feel a committee has to be formed but maybe some volunteer asdesignatedbycityhall. QoESTION t~ ATTACHMENT 1D Confined spaces like vehicles, or, only if agreed to by occupants.In large open areas, have a designated smoking section. NOTE: Smokers, like flag burners, also have constitutional rights. Defer to the non-smoker. Get a no smoking policy and that is that. Get some reasonable rules and stick to them. Nobody has the "right" to smoke in any place another person must go to perform their jobs. Also, there should be no smoking in areas open to the public. Don't aaow smoking. Don't know. No smoking. I would explain "In the interest of public safety" in hazardous areas. I would say other areas infringe upon the health and well being of non- smoking employees. There should be no smoking in vehicles - too cont'ined and health haaard. Open discussion and compromise re: designated smoking spaces. No smoking. It depends upon who it is. rights It is my belief that non-smokers/should be addressed first or take precedence in such disputes. Smokers should be asked politely, firmly, and if necessary, ordered not to intrude on non-smokers workspace. Have the individuals decide for themselves. Ban smoking in such areas. Establish a policy. lay the strongest person win. Everyone has their own rights. I'm a taxpayer and they work for nre. Non-smokers. have precedence. 2- QIJFS____ TIQN ~. ~ ATTACHMENT lE Defer to the non-smokers rights in spaces /aY'eas.....vehicles depend on theownerswishes. Common sense discussions. Allow smoking it all in vehicle agree. N/A to me. There should be a no smoking policy in confined areas. Any area with mixed response should be no smoking. Smoker defers to non-smoker if a problem. Ask them politely not to smoke. Non-smoking prevails. I have not hsd u~y conflicts with smokers nor do I intend to have any. I have had no conflicts thus far. Policy - No smoking in public buildings/places - not in public interest.Provide time/training to aid smokers in quiting, otherwise they gust findtime/place to smoke in non-public area. No smoking at any time. I think smokers should defer to non-smokers - allow times that alternate. Publicly funded bldgs, vehicles --- clean air act prevails -- a completelysmoke-free area/grnds. THIS IS A HEALTH ISSUE ATTACHMENT 2 September 18, 1989 TO: Falcon Heights City Council FROM: Smoking Committee: Gail Smida, Kitty Zimmerman, Jay Morgan, Carol Carlson The Smoking Committee met on six occasions and discussed at greatlengthhowtheCitycouldcomplywithStateLawregardingsmokingincityownedfacilitiesandvehicles. The Committee contactedtheLeagueofMinnesotaCities, neighboring communities andothercitiesthathadadopteda "Smoking Policy". Also, theCommittee's first task was to survey attitudes towards smokinginCitybuildingsandvehicles. A questionnaire was sent toCouncilmembers, Commissioners, and employees. Attached is acopyofthesurveyresults. The Committee after numerous hours of discussion voted 3 to 1Smida, Morgan and Zimmerman in favor; Carlson opposed) to recommendtheattachedSmokingPolicy. It was noted in the discussion that the Fire Department feelsthataFireHallisnotanordinaryworkenvironmentandis,in fact, a unique job site which creates much difficulty withcompliancetoStateLaw. At any given time, there may be oneto29firefightersintheFireDepartmentand95~ of the timethenumberisbetweenoneandfive. The Fire Department has.found the smokers and non-smokers are most cooperative. Thefirefightersfeeltheyarenotaffectinganyoneandsincethereiscurrentlynoconflict, why solve a problem that does not exist.Firefighter meetings last only four hours and are held only onceaweek, (which limits the amount of contact they have together). The firefighters also expressed concern that the City is writingapolicythatapplies100percentofthetimewheninfactitisneededonly50ofthetime. The minority vote reflects concern that not all the areas designatedassmokingwillcomplywithstatelaw. Costs for smoking cessation programs sponsored by the AmericanLungAssociationare: 1) $7 for a self help program -"FreedomfromSmoking" (20 days); 2) video with manual, $60/video; 3)on-site program @ $50 individual - minimum of 12 persons; and4) off-site program @ $50 person (hospital/community school,etc.). The Fire Department also proposes to establish a three memberSmokingCommitteemadeupoffirefighterstoreviewchangestotheFireDepartmentSmokingPolicyandtohearanycomplaintsregardingtheFireDepartmentSmokingPolicy. The firefightersfeeltheissueofworkerscompensationliabilityshouldnotaffectasmokingpolicy. ATTACHMENT 3A State Law The Minnesota Clean Indoor Act (MCIAA) waspassedin1975. The law ensures that smoke freeareasmustalwaysbeauailableinpublicplaces.It accomplishes this by prohibiting smokingeverywhereeseeptindesignatedareasandbyfor-bidding any public place except a bar to be designotedasasmokingareainitsentirety. The law has had an extremely good reception inMinnesota-mainly because it is reasonable. Itdoesnotpreventpeoplefromsmoking; rather, itrequiresthatcertainmeasuresbeadopted ~protect the health and comfort of nonsmokers. Compliance through Public Action Even though .polls show that Minnesotans ov-erwhelmingly favor the law and its intent, thereisstillnot-.total compliance, The state, due tolackoffundiing .and personnel, hoe had limitedenforcementcapabilities; so thetotaketheactive :role, vainpublic-.has had Prusure, or g ~~n..publicbothtoencouragecompliance. Meaning of the MCIAA Two out of three people do not smoke. The lawo~m the majority by forbidding smoking inosed. indoor areas used by the generalpublicorservingasaplaceofworkunlessitis ,thatreunless~~ To a smoker that meansSou, see a sign that says you ran, youcannot. i4nd to businesses that-means that the"rules must be learned so that if a smoking areaweredesignated {there does not have to be one),it must be properly located, marked, and super.vised. Introduction to the Requirements There are two parts- to tbe 11dCIAA; the law andtherules. The law is general. It grants peopletherighttosmoke-free indoor air but leaves ituptotheMinnesotaDepartmentofHealthtode-termine the details. The rules are the detailssuchasthesizeofnonsmokingareas, signs, whomustcomply, etc.). This brochure highlights the key requirementsoftheMCIAA, Each requirement will include areferencetothesectionofthelawortheruleonwinchrt ~ based• This guide is not exhaustive;further study ~' the actual ~~ or ~w is neces-sary for a full understanding of every provision. NO~• Federally-owned buildin¢s are exemptfromtheMCIAA. Buildings operated .but notownedbythefederalgovernmentarenotex-empt. Signs 1. If smoking-permitted areas are delisignsmustbepostedtellin grated, smokin g People whereg-permitted and nonsmoking areasare. Signs must be easy to see and. read andeYmustclearlydesignatetheboundarybetweenano,smoking and smoking-per.witted area (Rules, 4620.0500). 2. The statement "SMOKING ISPROHIBI'1*ED EXCEPT IN DESIGNATEDAREAS" must be posted at all major en-trances to every public building. In publicplaceswheresmokingisnotallowed, thestatement "NO SMOKWG IS PERMITTED1NTHISENTIRE ~T~ISHMENT" or asimilarstatementmust. be posted (Rules,4620.0500, Subpart 1 sad Subpart 2). Area. 3. A nonsmoking section must ben contiguouspartofaroomandmustmeasureamin-imum of 200 squai-e feet {I{~~~ ;4620.0100,Subpart 2). A nonsmoking section must beonesideoftheroom, although it uisy be theentireroom (Rules, 4620.t?400, Subpart 3). 4' ~ $ refit_aurant, at least 309E of the seats inthengareamutrtbedealnonsming (Rules, 4620.1000).. Fated as 5• :'If a king permitted area is designatedthereybe "one and onl 'Y one" per roomRules . 3 - "$moking-Permitted Area").See ~.P css ~ Work" below for only excep-tions). ' , 6• _ ~~s~of the designated smoking-per-shall -not be more than propor-donate to the preference of users of that lo-cation." If the person in charge chooses todesignateasmoking-permitted area, thatPei~n `shall use a survey or other reason.y4 - -' `able method to determine preference (Rules4620.0400, Subpart 4). Separation 7. The nonsmoking area must be separatedfromthesmoking-permitted area by a bar-rier at least 56 inches high or by a four footbufferone," unless the ventilation systemprovides6changesofairperhourana-t;cubic feet per minute per person of fresh airRules, 4620.0100, Subpart 2a). ATTACHMENT 3B Genera] 8. 9 10. 11. Portable ash trays are banned in all no-smoking areas" (Rules, 4620.0600) In nonsmoking areas "ash stands and per-manent ash trays shall be conspicuouslylabeledwiththefollowingmessageplacedonorneartheashstand: SMOKING ISPROHIBITEDPLEASEEXTINGUISHALLSMOKINGMATERIALSIMMEDIATELY"Rules, 4620.0600). A restaurant or other public place whichtakesadvancereservationsshallasktheei`son's preference for asmoking-permittedorno-smoking area at the time the reserva-tion is made" (Rules, 4620.0500, Subpart. 6). In restaurants, patrons must be asked theirpreferenceforasmoking-permitted or nonsmoking area (Rules, 4620.0500, Sub- part 6). In health caze facilities, prospectivepatientsorresidentsmustbeaskedtheirpreferenceforasmoking-permitted or nonsmoking area (Rules, 4620.1200). 12. "The proprietor or other person in charge of a public place shall make reasonable effortstopreventsmokinginapublic. place" byaskingsmokerstorefrainfromsmokingin nonsmoking areas (Minnesota Statues, Sec-tion 144.416). 13. If a service or activity of public place is 1o-Gated in asmoking-permitted area, it mustalsobeavailableinanonsmokingarea. Thesectionfornonsmokersmustcomplywithalltherules, including those regarding size and separation, or the entire azea must be desig-nated as nonsmoking. It is often more prac-tical to designate as nonsmoking all com-mon areas such as entry or exit areas, recep-tion areas, cash register areas, hallways, or copy areas unless there are two comparableareasusedforthesamepurpose, in which case one can besmoking-permitted (Rules,.4620.1400). 14. The carrying of lit cigarettes, pipes or cigarsisconsideredsmokingandisprohibitedex-cept in designated smoking areas (Minne-sots Statues, Section 144.413). Definitions 1.- Place of V-orlc. Where individuals perform services gratuitously or for profit. 2. Restaurant. Area where other than prepackaged meals are served (may therefore include. cafeterias within other types of estab- lishments}. 3. Retail Establishment. Those establishments where goods or services are purchased from employees on the premises {e.g_, grocery stores, convenience stores, bowling aAeys, barber shops, etc.). 4. Health Care Facility. (e.g., hospitals, clinics, nursing homes, etcJ b. Public Bufld'ung. Areas frequented by the general public where due to the nature of the building, lines, lounges, or common areas are key problems (e.g., schools, banks, laun- dromats, sports facilities, shopping centers, etc.). Places of Wark A full-time worker spends approximately 2,000hourseachyearonthejob. Whether that personworkswithornearasmokerisoftennotamat-e tar of choice.... Coatmon Violations - Commort~ violations range from unrestricted Smoking in common areas, to area managers not enforcing the rules,to total Aoncompliance (smoking allowedthroughout). Exceptions to General Rules -With the per-mission of company management, the occupantofaprivateofficemaydesignatethatofficeasasmoking-permitted area. Places of work that arenotcustomarilyfrequentedbythegeneralpublicmayhaveseveral, separate no-smaking andsmoking-permitted areas within the same roomprovidedeachno-smoking area is st least 200 square feet. ~uch workplaces must post at ]eastonesignper! floor which states SMOKING ISPROHIBITEEXCEPTINDESIGNATEDSMOKINGEASbutotherwiseare .not re-quired to po signs. In very large mamts (over20,000 square feet) the person in charge maydesignatemorethanoneamo~.permittedarea, but must otherwise follow tbs:t~les. ATTACHMENT 3C Restaurants . Restaurants came to terms with =the MCIAAearlierthananyothertypeoferfabli~hments.Although the law was originally opposed. bymanyrestaurants, most now find it eat and totheiradvantagetocomply. Common Violations - Smaller aid more isolated restaurants have been slower to crnnplywiththeMCIAA. Common violations are notdesignatingenoughseatsasnonsma~iBg,' notsepazatingthesectionscorrectly, or ast takingactiontostopsmokinginnonsmokiag~ess. Exceptions to General Rules - Iieataurants in which a host seats guests do not base to postsignsinsidetheeatingareabutmustpastasignstatingthatcontrolledseatingisneed- Bars canbedesignatedassmokingintheireatatety. Bars are defined as places where one ~ purchaseandconsumealcoholicbeverages, bate defini-tion excludes those kinds of places ~$'meals can be served to more than SQ peopk at a time.In other words, the fact that a restsara®t`aervesliquordoesn't make it a "bar." $ass that allowsmokingthroughoutmustpostasipssaying,THIS ESTABLISHMENT IS A S~tOII`INGAREAINITSENTIRETY," or a air state-ment. Retail Establishments Although the wording is not diraet, s !tactical application of the rules to retail stores is thattherecanbenosmokinginthecustomerportionofthestore (see A'13 above). In places where ser-vices are for sale such as bowling alleys andbarbershops, those services may be available inasmokingsection, but only if they are alsoavailableinanonsmokingsection. Customerloungeareasmayhavesmoking-permitted areasonlyiftherulesregardingsizeandseparationcanbemet. If for some reason they cannot be met, the area must be declazed entirelynonsmoking. Common Violations -The problem for manyretailestablishmentshasbeenahesitancytosetdownclearpolicies; consequently signs have notbeesposted, and customers and employees havenotbeenalertedtothefactthattheycannotsmokeeverywhere. Small retail establishments,where a practical division cannot be made, oftendefaulttosmokingthroughoutrather' than the4PP~~, as the law requires. Health Care Facilities Health Gaze facilities have generally compliedwellwiththeMCIA.A. This is natural because smoking causes or exacerbates many health problems. Complaints concerning the MCIA.Ausuallygetpromptattention. Common Violations -Violations seem to oc-cur most often in waiting rooms or lounges. Exceptions to General Rules -. Exceptions inhealthcarefacilitiesservetostrengthenprotec-tion of nonsmokers. The law says that visitorsandstaffcannotsmokeinpatientorresident's room unless it is expressly permitted. Smokingisalsopohibitedincorridors, emergency rooms,treatme~t rooms, admitting areas, and intensive care units. Public Buildings Public buildings" encompass a wide variety ofindoorareas. In public buildings it is up to build-ing managers to set a policy and post signs so itisclearthatsmokingisrestrictedtocertain azeas, if it is permitted at all. Compliance alsodepends~on smokers becoming aware of the rulesandfollowingthem. The fact that people smokewhereit's not expressly permitted illustrates the 1TjP between the law's intent and the change inculturalattitudesnecessaryforfullcompliance.No-amokdng reminders are important. Com-pliance would improve greatly if managers post-ed signs at entrances and carefully located andmarkedAnysmoking-permitted areas inside. Commo~t Violations -One common violationisthattherearenosigns, or improper signs atbuilding .entrances or inside. Another is thatthereishoenforcementorinadequateenforce-ment of any existing rules. Exceptions to General Rules -None. E:ceptiana to General Roles -None. ATTACHMENT 4 SMOKING POLICY PURPOSE To provide city officials, commissioners, employees, and generalpublicwithaworkandmeetingenvironmentthatistobaccofree. POLICY Smoking in city facilities and vehicles shall be prohibited withthefollowingexceptions: l) Public Works Foreman's Office 2) Public Works Restroom 3) Fire Department Apparatus Room, Training Room,Lounge, Kitchen, Dorm, and Office Lighted smoking materials (cigarette, cigars, and pipes) mustnotbecarriedintoanynosmokingarea. Portable ashtrays must not be moved into a no-smoking area. Grievance on the smoking policy except for the Fire Departmentmustbehandledaccordingtotheprocedureoutlinedintheemployee'smanual. Complaints from the Fire Department members regarding smokingpolicytobeheardbyathreemembercommitteeoffirefighters.All amendments to smoking policy which affects Fire DepartmentmustbereviewedbytheFireDepartmentSmokingCommittee. IMPLEMENTATION 1) The effective date of this policy shall be January 1, 1990. 2) Signs stating "SMOKING IS PROHIBITED EXCEPT IN DESIGNATEDAREAS" and."DESIGNATED SMOKING AREA" shall be installedbyJanuary1, 1990 3) Ashtrays to be removed from Non-Smoking areas byJanuary1, 1990 4) On-Site Smoking Cessation Program shall be offered employeesintheCityHallduring1990 Conaen~;~' Policy x CITY OF PALCON HEIGATS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Item:F-3 Meeting Date: 9~27~89 r i• i• Revised Exhibit "A": Sept., 1989 Original Contract: July 1, 1980 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS LAUDERDALE FIRE PROTECTION/PREVENTION CONTRACT January - December, 1990 A. Base Rate - Modification of Old Formula Comparison of Current/Modified Formu`_as to Determine Base Rate Assessed Value Fiscal Disp. TOTAL Total Base Total MV Total Base Current Contract Formula 87-88 14,396,245 445,431) 15,739,663 x($3.50/10,000) 5,508 88-89 14,376,255 689,380) 15,824,947 x($3.50/10,000) 5,538 92.4/PAV ) 1990 Assessed Value No Longer Calculated Modified Contract Formula Contract Contract Contract 1987MV)1988MV)1989MV) 56,206,502 59,943,300 65,463,100 x($98/million MV)x($98/million MV) x($98/million MV) 5,508 5,874 6,415 Page 1 i• B. Inspection Rate: This cost includes routine fire inspections as well as other related plan reviews, certificate of occupancy and fire code activities. 1988-89 1990 1. Routine inspections of 60 businesses and apartments. 120 60* The Fire Marshal and Fire Chief recommend that starting in 1990, annual inspections should be adequate. 2. Annual inspections of 4 tri-plex units. 4 4 3. Annual iinspections of 8 day care facilities. 8 g 88/89 Rate: $20/inspection 132 72 Proposed 1990 Rate: $22/inspection Total Cost: $2,640 1,584 C. 1988-89 Call Rate: $220/truck/hour 1990 Call Rate: $275/truck/hour Est. June/Dec. Total Contract Cost 1987-88 1988-89 1989 1990 A. Base Rate. $5,508 $5,538 6,415 B. Inspections 2,460 2,640 1/2 1,584 7,968 $8,178 4,089 7,999 C. # Fire Calls: 55 52 est)26 est)53 Cost for Calls: $22,220 $25,060 11,440 29,150 Total $30,188 $33,238 15,529 37,149 hours/call 1.8 2.19 2 est)2 hours Page 2 PROJECTED 1990 FIRE SERVICE COSTS* I. All Costs FF FP Ca . II. Not Capitol FF FP III. Not FP Cap FF IV. FF On]-Y 1990 Budget:200,696 128,509 168,465 96,278 Cost/Cap.34.36 22.00 28.84 16.48 3386 F.H. 58~116,343 74,492 97,652 55,801 2455 Laud. 42~84,354 54,010 70,802 40,458 5841 Total Pop. Cost/Call 1715 938 1230 $702 88Calls 64 FH 47$94,327 60,399 79,179 45,249 73 Laud. 53 106,369 68,109 89,286 51,027 137 Fire Call History:1987 1988 1989 July YTD) Falcon Heights 52 64 26 Lauderdale 51 73 29 TOTAL 103 137 55 Calculations based on Proposed 1990 Budget figures, estimated .fire calls Page 3 t G~sent Policy x _ A;cnda Ites~-4 CIT? OF TALCON HEIGHTS MaetiaS Date: 9/27/89 REQUES? POR COUNCIL COASIDERA?IG'N ITEM DESCRIPTION: STATE FAIR PARKING SIIBMITTED EY: Vince Wright and Carol Carlson HE'PZE~ED 3Y: Jan Wiessner D~LANATION/SUl44ARY (attach additional sheets as necessary): While the T989 Minnesota State Fair is still fresh in everyones mind, there are two parking related issues which should be considered: 1) Are any changes in current parking restrictions warranted? 2) Should the existing signs be changed? Current Situation A concern was raised by the City's Workers Compensation Insurance Company about the extent of lifting and pounding required in installing and removing the signs. One step which has been taken to relieve the physical exertion was the relocation of the signs from the second floor mezzanine to the first floor in the Public works area. Three hundred thirty seven (337) signs are currently .installed and removed each year. (See Attachment A: Current No Parking Postings.) This year the time was documented at a total of 217 hours. Five employees participated. The current cost of installing and removing 337 State Fair signs is: 2429 Personnel costs (217 hours at 4 rates $6-18 hour) George-24 hours, Vince-43 hours, Jay-70 hours, Tim-40 hours, John-40 hours .TOTAL - 217 hours) 375 Pneumatic hammer rental 252 Replacement Signs (33/year @ $7.64) 3056 i 2- Cost/Sign = $9.07 *(NOTE: We did not include costs of vehicle use. We used personne]_ costs because they could be assigned to other projects). It currently takes approximately 2 weeks to install the signs Alternatives: Carol gar son studied several other alternatives including: 1) Continue with present system - permanent signs installed on temporary basis using existing signs (no permanent base) 2) Install permanent new signs and replace only as needed no permanent base) 3) Install existing permanent signs on temporary basis using concrete and Telspar tubing base (permanent) and signs are put up each year before Fair and taken down after the Fair is over. 4) Contract with Ramsey County (or other agency) to install existing signs on an annual basis (no base - same as Alternative with another agency doing the work). 5) Combination of Option 1 and 2 - Continue to use present system while installing 67 new signs with concrete basis each year for five years until all signs have been replaced. Signs can easily be put up and taken down. 6) Cardboard signs - installed a day or two before the fair starts. The Public works Staff felt strongly about the negative aspects of the other alternatives so they are not detailed here. If you would like further information on these other options, please call before the. Council meeting and we can provide it for you. Alternative l: Sign Reduction According to Ken Wenzel, the State Fair has added approximately 6,000 (net) Park and Ride spaces in the last ten years. They did not fill the Park and Ride facilities any day during the last two years. Areas which may not need to be posted No Parking include: A) Westside of E. Snelling Drive from Larpenteur/ Roselawn B) Eastside of West Snelling Avenue from Larpenteur/ Roselawn C) The area north of Garden, west of Hamline, south of Roselawn and east of Asbury There are approximately 75 signs in area (A, B and C). This would save approximately $680 ($9.07 x 75). Alternative 2 - Permanent Signs The Public Works staff recommends that signs be purchased similar to the signs St. Paul uses south of the State Fair which say: 3- NO PARKING DURING STATE FAIR AUG THRU SEPT These signs would be left up year round. all at once or phased in. A) All at once: - 1st Year Cost 1405 Personnel 375 Pneumatic Hammer 2520 Sign Cost 4300 They could be installed Following years: Repair/Replacement Onl 243 Personnel 100 Pneumatic Hammer Rental 252 (33/year @ $7.65) 595 1244 ($2461) = 2nd Year Payback Pro - This option addresses the carrying and pounding of the signs. This option projects costs of sign replacement at 10~ per year based on the estimated life of a sign at 10 years ($7.65 per new sign and $2.69 for "refinished signs". Con - Permanent signs could be considered visual pollution by some of the residients. Replacement costs may be higher due to vandalism and weathering of the signs. ATTACHMENT A. 1. All of Northome Addition, water side 2. All of Hollywood Court including alley 3. St. Mary's, Fry, Mapl~.e Knoll Drive and Garden Avenue west of Snelling on both sides 4. All streets north of Larpenteur, between Snelling and Hamline running to Roselawn, except Holton, Albert and Sheldon north of Ruggles (water side) 5. Tatum, 1,300 feet north of Larpenteur 6. Lindig on Waterside including the cul-de-sacs 7. Larpenteur Avenue from Snelling to Cleveland 8. Snelling Drive north and southbound and Snelling Avenue both sides. r~ Consent Policy x r L_ CITY OF PALCON ~iEIGHTS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Item: F-5 Meeting Date: 927/89 ITEM DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED RECYCLYING CONTRACT WITH SUPERCYCLE, INC. SUBMITTED BY•Shirley Chenoweth REVIEWED BY: ~Tom Gedde Solid Waste Commission ERPLANATION/SUMMARY attach additional sheets as necessary); Tom Gedde and th e Solid Waste Commission have reviewed and recommend approval of the attached contract. ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of contract and authorization to submit to Supercycle. CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS AND SUPER CYCLE, INC. FOR THE COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLE MATERIAL This agreement is made this day of 1989, between the City of Falcon Heights (hereinafter City and Super Cycle, Inc. (hereinafter Contractor). Witnesseth: Whereas, the City supports curbside collection of source separated materials for recycling and desires that it be made available to its residents; and Whereas, the City supports curbside collection of source separated materials as an integral part of an overall landfill abatement, solid waste management strategy; and Whereas, Ramsey County has funding available for this program to the City; and Whereas, the Contractor has submitted a bid for curbside collection of source separated materials to the City; Now, therefore, the City and Contractor mutually agree as follows, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein: 1. Definitions 1.1 "Service Area" shall mean the legal boundaries of the City of Falcon Heights. 1.2 "Recyclable Materials" shall include, but not be limited to; all glass food and beverage containers, all mixed metal and aluminum food and beverage containers and newsprint. Other items such as yard waste, PETE, HDPE, corrugated cardboard and office type paper may be added as mutually agreed. 1.3 "Certified Dwelling Unit (CDU)" shall mean all single family homes, townhomes, twinhomes, du-plex, four-plex and mobile home parks. Other buildings such-as, schools, small businesses, municipal buildings, and multi-family buildings may be included if convenient to curbside collection. 1.4 "Recyclable Collection" shall mean the taking up of all source separated recyclable material accumulated at all CDU's and the transporting of the recyclables to a processing facility or market which is approved by the city. 2. Payment i 2.1 The City will compensate the contractor for the collection of recyclables described in section 3 as follows: 2- 2.1.1 A payment on the last day of each month of the contract in the amount of $67.50 per ton for curbside pickup. Minimum payment will be $1,100.00 per month. 2.1.2 A payment on the last day of each month of the contract in the amount of $147.60 for weekly pick up at 1666 Coffman (multi-unit) 2.2 The contractor shall include the following on each monthly invoice. The invoice shall be at the Office of the City Administrator no later than 4:30 p.m. on the 15th of each month. 2.2.1 Tons and participating CDU•s per collection day 2.2.2 Tons and participating CDU's for the month. 2.2.3 Total number of missed stops for the month, listed by collection day. 2.2.4 Call sheet listing complainants name, address, phone number, nature of complaint and action taken to rectify said complaint. 2.2.5 Original truck scale receipts from an approved market and/or processing facility. 2.2.6 Total cost of collection for said month. 2.3 The City shall provide the contractor maps of the city noting areas in which collection is not desired and/or necessary. 2.4 The City may withhold payment for collection if monthly reports and/or curbside collection are deemed to be incomplete or inadequate. 2.5 The City or the Contractor may request amendments to the price paid at anytime during the contract period as a result of such things as removal or addition of recyclables to the collection. 3. Obligations-Contractor 3.1 Service - The contractor shall provide collection of recyclables to all CDU's within the city limits according to the following schedule: 3.1.1 Collection will be provided to all CDU's in the City on the first and third Friday of each month. 3.2 Delivery of Materials - The contractor shall deliver all source separated materials collection from each participating CDU to a City approved market or processing facility. 3.2.1 The contractor may, with prior approval of the city, deliver recyclable material to the Newport facility, at the contractors expense, if all other options of disposal have been exhausted. At no time is any recyclable material to be 3- deposited in a landfill. The Contractor may deliver material to the Newport facilityforuptosixty (60) days. At the end of sixty (60) days, the city will review with the contractor the need to continue deliveryofsaidmaterialtotheNewportfacility. If need exists after the sixty (60) days, the City may opt to discontinue collection of the designated material. If this option is selected, the Contractor shall help in notifying the. public of this occurrence. 3.3 Contractors Operation - The Contractor shall establish and maintain, in a location approved by the City, an office with continuous supervision for accepting and recording complaints and customer calls. The office shall be in service with continuous supervision during the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on all days of collection as specified in section 3.1.1 of this agreement.The address and telephone number of such office shall be giventotheCityinwriting. Changes in the office location and/or phone number shall be given to the City in writing ten (10) dayspriortothechange. The address of this office is at 775 Rice Street, St. Paul, MN 55101. The phone number is 224-5081. 3.4 Collection - 3.4.1 The Contractor shall collect all recyclables from all participating CDU's beginning July 7, 1989 and continue throughDecember31, 1990. 3.4.2 The Contractor shall complete the collection accordingtotheschedulesetinsection3.1.1 of this agreement. Collection shall begin by ?:00 a.m. and be completed by 5:30 p.m. or sunset, whichever is earlier. 3.4.3 The Contractor will answer and document all customer calls by taking the callers name, address, phone number and nature of call. 3.4.4 All calls shall be answered promptly and courteously. 3.4.5 All complaint calls received by the City shall be referred to the Contractor. The Contractor will be responsible for all corrective action. 3.4.6 Whenever the of locations which have not is required to service said day. Failure to do so will contractor for each day the 3.4.7 Recyclable m manner: City or resident notifies the Contractor received service, the Contractor location by 3:00 p.m. the following result in a $2.00 fee against the house is not serviced. aterial shall be prepared in the following NEWSPRINT: Place in a paper bag, a box or bundle and tie with string, twine or other material. 4- GLASS: Rinse out and place in a paper bag or box. J METALS: Rinse out and place in a paper bag or box. CORRUGATED CARDBOARD: Tie in bundles no larger then a three by three square. 3.4.8 All other material added shall have preparationrequirementsdevelopedatthetimeofintroductiontotheprogram. 3.4.9 Containers used for storing source separated materials,shall be placed at the curbside or alley on the designated collectiondayinplainsighttothecontractornolaterthen7:00 a.m. 3.4.10 Containers other than boxes and paper bags maybeusedbytheCDU's as long as said container is adequatelymarked. Containers marked "SAVE" shall be left at the curb for re-use by the resident. 3.4.11 Recyclable materials deemed to be unacceptablebytheContractor, according to the preparation procedures insection3.4.7, shall be collected on the first occurrence bytheContractorandnoticeleftastotheproperpreparation ofthematerials. On the second occurrence the contractor shall collect the material and notice shall be given to the homeowner indicatingthatmaterialswhicharenotproperlypreparedwillnotbecollected. Notice shall be given to the city regarding the address and reason the material was deemed unacceptable. On the third and subsequent occurrences, the Contractor shall leave material and notice explaining why the material was not collected. 3.5 Vehicles 3.5.1 All Contractors vehicles shall be clearly marked with identical markings bearing the Contractors name and logo. 3.5.2 The Contractor shall maintain all vehicles and equipment used in the collection of recyclable material in goodworkingcondition. All trucks shall be free of offensive odors, be clean and be aesthetically pleasing. 3.5.3 All vehicles and equipment used shall be constructed to prohibit the spilling or blowing of material. 3.5.4 All collection equipment shall be equipped with tools necessary for the clean-up of any spills. 4. TERM The term of this agreement shall be from July 7, 1989 and continue through December 31, 1990. 5- 5. CANCELLATION Either party may cancel this agreement at anytimeuponon-hundred and twenty (120) days written notice totheotherparty. In the event of such an occurrence, the contractorshallbeentitledtoreimbursementforthoseexpensesincurreduptotheterminationdate, provided the contractor continuesserviceasoutlinedinsection3. 6. DEFAULT Any of the following shall constitute default onthepartoftheContractorandtheresultwillbesubjecttotheCitycollectiononthebondand/or requesting just compensation. 6.1 Failure of the Contractor to submit the required reportsoutlinedinsection2, subsection 2. 6.2 Failure of the Contractor to provide service in a mannerconsistent•with section 3. 6.3 Falsifying any records and/or any reports. 6.4 Failure to give the City the required one hundred andtwenty (120) day written notice when cancelling the contract. 6.5 Failure to comply with any of the other terms and covenantsofthisagreement. 7. GENERAL CONDITIONS 7.1 All services and duties performed by the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed to the satisfactionoftheCity, and in accordance with all applicable Federal, StateandLocallaws, ordinances, rules and regulations as a conditionofpayment. The Contractor agrees to comply with all Federal,State, and Local Laws, ordinances and policies regarding AffirmativeActionandEqualEmployment. 7.2 The Contractor shall post a bond of not less than three3) months collection fee to be made available to the City intheeventoftheContractor's inability to execute the Contractor'sobligationssetforthbythisagreement. 7.3 The Contractor must obtain and submit to the City Administrator,certificates showing proof of the following insurance coverageswiththeseminimumlevelsofcoverage: Vehicle Liability $300,000/$500,000 Property Damage $100,000 Geneeral Liability $250,000 Statutory Workers' Compensation Insurance Said certificates shall state that the City will be given thirty30) days notice of cancellation of said insurance. 7.4 The Contractor shall at all times be an independentContractorandshallnotbetheemployeeoftheCityforanypurpose. The City shall not be responsible for the payment of any taxes, either Federal or State, on behalf of the Contractor, t J 6- nor shall the City be responsible for any fringe benefits. NoCivilServiceorotherrightsofemploymentwillbeaquiredbyvirtueoftheContractor's services. 7.5 The Contractor agrees to defend, hold harmless, andpay, on behalf of the City and its officials, agents, and employees,from any and all liability, loss, or damage they may suffer asaresultofdemand, claims, judgments, or costs, arising outoftheContractor's negligent action,. or failure to act in performanceofthisAgreement. 7.6 Any amendments to this Agreement shall be valid onlywhenreducedtowriting, and duly signed by the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have subscribed their names asofthedatefirstwritten. contractor)City of Falcon Heights By: Chief Executive Officer By: Mayor By: City Clerk n u Consent Policy x L_.J ITEM DESCRIPTION: SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: CITY OF FALCON HEIGATS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION STRATFORD PROFESSIONAL OFFICE PARK ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT Jan Wiessner City Attorney EXPLANATION/SUMMARY (attach additional sheets as necessary); Agenda Item: F-6 Meeting Date: 9/27/89 There have been several potential buyers looking at the StratfordOfficeParkcomplexwhohaveaskedabouttheCity's positionregardingenforcementofthecurrentAssessmentAgreement. EdBockhasissuedalegalopinionregardingthevalidityoftheagreementintheeventanon-tax paying entity should purchasetheproperty. He also makes recommendations to confirm our position. ATTACHMENTS: A. B. ACTION REQUESTED: 9/14/89 Bock Letter 3/11/89 Assessment Agreement (Page 1 and 2 Only) Consider action recommended by Attorney Bock. ATTACHMENT A -1 BOCK, EDWARD A., JR. BUCHMAN, JOHN T. GEDDE, THOMAS A. GROVER,BETH H. HICKEN, JEFFREY P. HOWARD, ROBERT A. JENSEN, DAVID L. MATTRE, PAUL E. SCOTT, MICHAEL J. SOUCIE, FRED M. JENSEN, HICKEN, GEDDE ~ SOUCIE, P. A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 300 ANOKA OFFICE CENTER 2150 THIRD AVENUE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303-2296 TELEPHONE (812) 421-4110 TELECOPIER (812) 421-1040 SEP ~ 51989 OF COUNSEL HADLEY, CHARLES S. LUTHER,RICHARD L. September 14, 1989 Ms. Jan Wiessner Falcon Heights City Manager 2077 West Larpenteur Avenue Falcon Heights, MN 55113-5594 Re: Stratford Professional Office Park Dear Jan: This is a follow up to my letter of May 18, 1989, regardingtheabove-referenced tax increment project. The question has been raised: What happens with respect torealestatetaxesifanon-taxable entity, such as theUniversityofMinnesota, acquires title to the StratfordProfessionalOfficeParkproperty? I have found no Minnesota court cases on point and theStatutesdonotaddressthequestiondirectly, but in myopinionastrongargumentcanbemadethatthepropertywillremaintaxableandthatthetaxincrementwillbepayabletotheCityofFalconHeights. My argument is based on theexistenceoftheAssessmentAgreementdatedMarch12, 1986,and filed April 17, 1986 as Ramsey County Recorder Documentv'a. 231C714. According to Min=.esota Statutes, sect-ion469.177, Subd. 8, the recording of an ,assessment agreementShallconstitutenoticeoftheagreementtoanysubsequentpurchaserorencumbrancerofthelandoranypartthereof,whether voluntary or involuntary, and shall be binding uponthem". (Emphasis added.) I would interpret the word "any" toincludepublicentitieswhichareusuallynottaxable. Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179 deal withtaxincrement "financing". The use of tax increment paymentstopaybondsiscontemplatedthroughoutthosesections. Amunicipalityactuallypledgestaxincrementforthepayment ofbondsinaccordancewithMinnesotaStatutes, Section 469.178,Subd. 2. The whole idea of the Statutes is that themunicipalityisrelyingontherealestatetaxincrements to ATTACHMENT A-2 Ms. Jan Wiessner September 14, 1989 Page 2 cover bond payments. A public entity which acquires landsubjecttoanassessmentagreementshouldexpecttopayrealestatetaxes, unless the Statutes give it a specificexemption. However, the Statutes appear to make an assessmentagreementbindingon "any" purchaser of the property. I recommend that the City of Falcon Heights consider takingthefollowingstepsinconnectionwiththismatter: 1. Send a letter to the current fee owner of the propertyasofMay1989thatwasCommercialStateBank) advising itthattheCii:y intends to enforce the Assessment Agreement onthepropertyandrequestingthattheowneradviseanyprospectivepurchaserofthatfact, so that there will be nodisputeaboutthatfactifthepropertyissold. 2. Advise .the Ramsey County Department of Taxation inwritingthattheCityintendstoenforcetheAssessmentAgreementagainstthepropertyandexpectstocollectits taxincrements, even if the property is acquired by a publicentity. 3. If the City learns about the existence of a prospectivepurchaser, advise that purchaser of the City's positionregardingtheAssessmentAgreementandpaymentofreal estatetaxes. 4. If there is a dispute between the City and a purchaser ofthepropertyregardingtherealestatetaxissue, seek anopinionfromtheMinnesotaAttorneyGeneral's Office regardingthematter. Please let me know if you wish this office to follow throughonanyoftheserecommendations. For example, it would be agoodideatosendalettertoCommercialStQ.te Rank ri.g~taway. Very truly yours, JENSEN, HICKEN, GEDDE & SCOTT, P.A. ic Edward A. Bock, Jr. EAB/fak r ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, dated as o.f this 11th day of March, 1986byandamongtheCityofFalconHeights (the "City"), StratfordInvestments, Ltd. (the "Developer"), and the Assessor forRamseCountthe )Y Y ( "Assessor" , WITNESSETH WHEREAS, on or before the date hereof the City and Developer have entered into a Development Agreement datedDecember19, 1985, as~revised on March 7, 1986 (theAgreement"), regarding certain real property located in theCity (the "Development Property"), which property is legallyJdescribedonExhibitAattachedheretoandherebymadeaparthereof; WHEREAS, it is contemplated that pursuant to said Agree-s ment, the Developer will undertake the development of anapproximately54,000 square foot, six building project (theProject") on the Development Property; n WHEREAS, the City and Developer desire to establish aminimummarketvaluefortheDevelopmentPropertyandtheimprovementstobeconstructedthereon, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 8; and WHEREAS, the City and the Assessor have reviewed plans andspecificationsfortheProjectandthemarketvaluepreviouslyassignedtotheDevelopmentProperty: NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to this Agreement, in consid-eration of the promises, covenants and agreements made by eachtotheother, do hereby agree as follows: 1. Upon substantial completion of the Minimum Improve-ments, the minimum market value of the Development PropertyshallbeThreeMillionFiveHundredForty-Four Thousand NineHundredDollars ($3,544,900). The parties to this AgreementexpectthattheconstructionoftheMinimumImprovementswillbecompletedonorbeforeDecember31, 1988. 2. Upon completion of a building constituting a part oftheProjectsoonerthansaidDecember31, 1988, the MinimumMarketValueofsuchbuildingandportionoftheDevelopmentPropertyonwhichitislocatedshallbeassetforthonExhibitBheretoandherebymadeaparthereof. ATTACHMENT B-2 r 3• The minimum market value herein established shall beofnofurtherforceandeffect, and this Agreement shall ter-minate, on January 1, 1995. 4• This Agreement shall be promptly recorded by theDeveloperalongwithacopyofMinnesotaStatutes, Section273.76, Subdivision 8, attached hereto as Exhibit C and herebymadeaparthereof. The Developer shall pay all costs ofrecording. 5• Th° Assessor represents that he has reviewed the plansandspecificationsfortheimprovementsandthemarketvaluepreviouslyassignedtothelanduponwhichtheimprovementsaretobeconstructed, and that the "minimum market value" as setforthaboveisreasonable. 6• Neither the preamble nor provisions of this Agreementareintendedtomodify, nor shall they be construed asmodifying, the terms of the Agreement between the City and theDeveloper. 7• This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bebindinguponthesuccessorsandassignsoftheparties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City, the Developer and theAssessorhavecausedthisAgreementtobeexecutedintheirnamesandontheirbehalf,. all as of the date set. forth above. THE CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA Its Signature page for Assessment Agreement by and among the CityofFalconHeights, Minnesota, the Ramsey County Assessor, andStratfordInvestments, Ltd. 2 Consent Policy x CITY OF FALCON ~iEIGHTS REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Item: F-7 Meeting Date: 9/27/89 t . A. P.3i4 L.:J AGREEMENT REGARD2NG FALCON HEIGHTSELEMENTARY. SCHOOL p~yGROUND~p~ THI$ AGREEMENT is made on this day of 1989 between the City of Falcon Hei hts ag Minnesota municipalcorporation (the ~Cit `'~`~"'~'~~` Q"~"` _Y"), and e t Schools~DistricttheHSchoo~, District"). 623 WHEREAS, the School. District is the owner of the buildinandgrounds (the ppla „ 5 yground ) located in the City of FalconHeightsandknownastheFalconHeightsElementarySchoolplayground, and and WHEREAS, the grounds are used i.n part for playground pur-poses to accommodate the students of the School District and arealsousedtoaccommodatetheparkandrecreational. needs of thecitizensofFalconHeights, and WHEREAS the City and the School District would lzke to co-operate in the purchase, installation and maintenance of addi-tional recreational equipment on said grounds so as to betterservetheneedsofboththestudentsoftheSchoolDistrictandthecitizensofFalcanHeights, and WHEREAS, the City and the School District would like to co-operate to insure that the playground property will beonapermanent available basis to serve the recreational needs of the stu_dents of the School District and the citizens of FalconHeights. NpW, THEREFGRE, it is hereby agreed between the parties asfollows: t P.4/4 1. The Cit y wi11 pay to the School District the sum of 5,00~•pp to be used by the School District for the purchase of recreational equipment to be installed on the above-referenced grounds. The equipment will be owned and maintained by the School District, which assumes responsibility foz any claims arising out of the use of said equipment and agrees to indemnifytheCityagainstanysuchclaims, 2. Sch D' a 1 i the qua.pmentti purchased with the contribution of Falcon Heights,~aum~ ~n the event at any future date that the School Dis- tract removes the equipment from the grounds, the School District shall notify the City, in advance, and shall give the City the option to purchase the equipment for $1.00. 3• The School District agrees not to sell the grounds adw acent to the Falcon Heights Elements SchoolrY to any other partywithintenyearsfromthedateofthisAgreementwithoutgivingtheCitytherightoffirstrefusaltopurchasesaidpropertyand further agrees to explore with the City an arrangement wherebytheCitycouldacquirealIarpartofthegroundstobeusedfor permanent park purposes. CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS By Tts INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTN0. 623 By Tts