HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCMin_59Aug24_Special~~~
SPECIAL I4iEETING AUGUST 2l~th9 1959.
Meeting was called to order at 7s00 P. M., the following Council Members being
present: Harold C. Nilsen, Mayor; George J. Shavor, Trustee; Wm. R. Utecht, Clerk.
Also present were Frank N. Graham, Village Attorney; Vern Ljungren, Village Engineer.
Absent: Willis Warkentien and Paul Coppini, Trustees.
Bids on the im- Bids on the improvement of Larpenteur Avenue from Snelling Avenue
provemen t of Lar- west to a point 726 feet east of the center line of Cleveland
penteur Ave. by Avenue by 'the extension of water mains and appurtenances according
the extension of to plans and specifications on file in the office of the Village
Water Mains Clerk were opened and read as follows
Lametti & Sons, 211 No. Pascal Ave. St. Paul, Minnesota
$66l~,188.00
Bid bond was attached in the amount of 10~ of bid,
Herbst Construction Co. Minneapolis Minn. X50,006.00
Bi bond was attached in the amount of 10% of bid.
Robert W. Moore ~ Austin P. Keller, 1613 Ridgewood Lane,
St. a ,Minnesota X78,119.00
Rid bond was attached in the amount of 10~ of bid.
Montgomery Construction Co., St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin
360,300.00
Bind bond was attached in the amount of'10~ of bid.
It was moved by Utecht, seconded by Nilsen and unanimously voted
that bids be turned over to Engineer Ljungren for checking and
then turned over to Attorney Graham.
Hearing - Fry St. Utecht read Notice of Hearing for the Improvement of Fry Street
Water Main. by the Extension of Vtater Main as published in the Rose Tribune
August 13th and 20th, 1959. Mayor Nilsen reviewed the history
of the proposed improvement and Village Engineer Ljungren presented
• the technical problems of extending this main.
Question by H. Klosterman - 1736 Fry Streets What would be the
advantage of running this up Fry Street? Without the pumping
station, would there be any increase in pressure? Ljungren
ans:rered: Not without the pumping station - It is intended
that a pumping station be put in.
C. Kilberg, 1503 Garden: What is the estimated cost of the
pumping station? Nilsen: $1b,500.00.
Kilberg: Who pays for that? Nilsen: Those are problems yet to
go into. When the main goes into use, the cost will be borne by
users when they connect to the. main.
Kilbergs Is there anything different about the pumping station
that was contemplated in Maple Kno11? Nilsen: No one here is
acquainted with the job for Maple Knoll.
Ljungrens Originally, an underground station was ruled out by
.the State Board of Health. It has to be built in a separate
building above the ground. The station a.s pretty much standard
and has been used in a large number of installations.
~~~
Kilberg: Why can't you get the same results in our area?
Ljungren: You have the problem of segregating Village. You
would be pumping water back into St. Paul to the homes cm the
high pressure part of the pump. We would use a gate
valve at Maple Knoll tiwhich would act so that the valve was
closed when pressure was higher than in the main. However,
when the two would equalize, it would open.
Kilberg: Is this a 6" main at Snelling? Ljungren: No, a
16" main at Snelling, then to 12".
Kilberg: What you really are talking about is not just
$6;000.00? Nilsens The whole system would total 952,000;
956,000: X80,000 on the entire line, including the pumping
station. All Benefited property owners will be assessed.
Kilberg: What is the pumping station charge per foot?
Ljungrena Charge for the pumping station and oversizing
of mains - we have gone through the .number of houses, some
~~ master
lannin
street la
outs
etc
---
p
g,
y
,
.
0. J. Wall, 1645 Garden Avenues Am I right in assuming that
the University will be assessed? Grahams If the property
North of Larpenteur were released, then the Village would be
able to charge them on an equitable basis for the work done,
on the same basis as other property owners. We cannot now assess
them. Ljungrena Provisions have been made in the system that
will permit the University to connect if they want to. Certain
adjustments can be made. It can be worked into their property.
H. Klosterman, 1736 Fry Street: If this line goes up Fry
S
d
treet,
o the people on Fry have to pay some extra money?
Korstad, 1625 Garden: We had a meeting of our group. Vde do
have money and, to date, X1500. has been pledged to the people
on Fry to offset the cost of this line on Fry. The total is
X1806. We have about 91500. of that, roughly.
Mrs. Kittleson, 1718 Fry: I -.was wondering why they pick on
Fry Street. Nilsens I donat think there was any choice except
there are undeveloped lots on Fry Street.
f~uestion: Has the Council a~anroached the University lately,
or is it just hearsay? Nilsen: We had a letter from the
University, dated December 31st, 1958, in which they stated
their water requirements were well taken care of and they were
not interested in a water main on Larpenteur Avenue as pro-
posed.
Questions Now that the improvements are. coming on Larpenteur
Avenue, wouldn't it be well to inquire again? Nilsen: It will
do no good. We have talked to University people many times.
They provide for their own use as they see fit. Ljungrena
There is a possibility of having 324 houses connected to the
pumping station, and breaking it down on the cost per meter
side - 1, 2, 3, and !~, the coat on a 3/~" meter would be
X60.00 and the connection charge on a ~" meter ~16l~O.OOp
That includes the pumping station. Shavor: In addition to
the footage charge, there is <~ connection charge.
F-
~~
M. A. Jarvis, 165b Garden: Do you propose that all homes
connect on to the water system, and what would be the charge
to the ones already hooked on to the water? Nilsens We
haven't given any thought to having everyone connect. There
are a large number of users on Larpenteur Avenue who want to
connect immediately. Also some on Tatum, Fairview and West
of Tatum, Hermes Greenhouses. These people are connected
and were in 1918 at their own expense. They are now having
trouble with leaks and the county has refused to do any
more repair work under the streets.
Stanley P. Schultz, 1725 No. Fry Streets The figures you are
discussing are approximate figures? L~ungren: That is right.
Schultzs They could eventually run more, couldn't they?
Nilsens It could run more or less. That is all you can have
at a hearing. We will not know what you have to pay until the
bids come in.
Schultz: There is no purpose in having an estimated cost then?
Nilsens Yes, it is an estimate. It might run 20~ over or 20~
less.
Schultz: Tn some cases, people have been quoted some figures
and in the end it increased a considerable sum. Nilsen: It
is not possible for us to sit here and answer that. V~Te have
bids ranging from X50,000 to X78,000 for the same piece of work.
Questions I cannot see why the water should go up Fry Street
at all because they are not the ones who will benefit from it.
I don't believe it is necessary. If it benefits someone else
to a great extent, they should be assessed. Grahams There
might be a way to figure this out. Actually, it was thought
that Fry Street people would he paying for their water on the
same basis as the people on Tatum, Fairview and other areas
to get water in front of their house. It wasn't thought that
they would apply this - what Maple Knoll was talking about -
to reduce the assessment. That X1800. would be best applied
to the pumping station which would benefit Maple Knoll. The
assessment for the pumping station can be assessed to the
whole benefited area which would include Maple Knoll, In that
case, Maple Knoll would pay for the pumping station along with
everyone else. Understand, the Council has not determined any
of these things - that is why we are having a hearing.
Charles Reiter, 17l~6 Fry Streets It seems pretty well estab-
lished that the water main will go on Fry Street. Nilsens
Nothing has been determined yet. We are having a Hearing so as to
determine whether or not it goes on Fry Street. L~ungren: From
an engineering standpoint, it would be better to put the water main
on Fry Street. One reason for selecting Fry is that there are
more vacant lots on Fry.
Mrs. Kittlesons Is it possible that, some time in the future,
if the Council so desires, they can force the people to hook up,
assuming that a well is in good operating condition? Nilsen:
I don't know. Then you dump your sewage on to the lawn, you
endanger people around you. I am not sure the same reasons ex-
ist which would require you to connect to village water. L3ungren,
~~`~~ can you require people to do so? Ljungrena I have not seen it
done. Graham: It is my impression that as long as you are sat-
isfied with your own water, you may go ahead and use it. There
is not the reason to make you hook up to water as there would
be to hook up to the sewer, You and your family are primarily
concerned in the use of the water. I would guess that they
probably would not have the power, but I will check.
Korstad: As I understand the over-all plan of the Council,
instead of putting a big water tank in, you contemplate
putting a booster station West of Snelling and then another
one East of Snelling. Is that right? Ljungren: The area
East of Snelling. and South of Larpenteur is not having a par-
ticular r~roblem. The area that is experiencing the difficulty
is generally North of Larnenteur which can be segregated and
put on pumps. Eventually we might build a second pumping
station at Hamline and Larpenteur. O~.ir pressure checks 35 to
ISO pounds, but as you go further North, the pressure lessens,
Korstad: It is not contemplated right away then? Ljungren: No,
only if the need develops,
Nilsen: One of the problems all of us living West of Snelling
have is that we are penalized by the University property. We
would probably have homes on both sides of the. street if it
were not for the University. We have got to accept the cost
and we have got to face it, We have the problem of people
East of Snelling having paid for the mains and the ones West of
Snelling have to bear the cost.
Klostermans Most of the homes on Fry Street are only 3 and 4
years old. and actually would not derive any benefit from a
water main. With the pumping station, Z cannot see where the
people would benefit. Nilsens You will recall tl4at, under the
original proposal, the underground pumping station was in the
plans. We were forced to turn it down. Had the State Board
of Health approved, we would have been on our way now. We had
to hold up the plans for the pumping station until a site was
found
Ljungrens It is impossible to do anything on Snelling at this
time. A contemplated inter-change is coming in on Snelling and
Larpen tear and the State does not want to give us their permit
to use their right of way. Another problem is that we cannot
open up the roads - it has to be done through tunnelling.
Nilsens The only sensible, logical vray is to lay the pipe
where it is to be used.
Mrs, Kittleson: I called the St. Paul Water Department and
was informed that, in St. Paul, they do not put in water mains
unless at least 50% of the people petition for it. I don't
think you can find 5~ here, so can you actually go ahead and do
this'. What good does it do the people to ax~near at a Hearing?
Nilsens The reason we. have a Hearing is to find this out.
Mrs. Kittlesons It is clearly indicated +.hat they do not want
it. Can you still go ahead with it? Graham: Your conclusions
are right. The Council, by a ~~5 vote could require that this
water main go down Fry Street. We are not bound. by any percent-
1
1
1
1281
age of the voters. In St. Paul, it is different. That is
not the procedure set up in the State law under which we operate,
where 35% of the voters could require the Council to consider
this. When the Council starts an action, there must be a !~/5
vote of the Council to carry it.
b4rs. Kittlesont They said this is a general practice in most
areas served by the St. Paul Water System. Nilsens You are
correct in your assumption to this point - the reason the Council
goes on this way is to get you down here to talk this over.
Graham: We have called this Hearing because the people in
Maple Knoll wanted this to go ahead:.
Korstads The Engin-per has assured. us that booster pump and 12"
main will not reduce our pressure. We are scared of this. Our
Engineer assured us the only way to regulate water pressure
would be to put a main up Fry Street. We were just as dis-
appointed as you were. Eventually you people will want water
on Fry Street. We are willing .to help pay-for a water main going
up Fry Street. We can contribute about 1/3 of the cost.
Schultz:, Why not take this assessment around Maple Knoll where
it is to be used? Nilsens We can assess only the benefited
users. Under the circumstances, are you willing to invest in
the future now? Shavor: Richfield and F3loomington are having
trouble now, and maybe Roseville. Isn't there a possibility
that the water level is doing down in this area? Ljungren: We
hafvehad 5 wells go dry in my block. The water level in this
general area has dropped 10 feet.
Nilsen: Regarding fire rates which are determined by the Fire
Underwriters, I have a letter from the Chief of Fire Protection
dated April, 1959 and I will read it to you. Letter was read.
Mrs. Kittlesons Would it make any difference in the fire insurance
rates if we have this? Nilsens We cannot say until they come out
to inspect again.
Utechts I suPgest that a roll call of the people present be made
and we can determine how many are for and how many against, and
get more opinions.
Roll call was taken, 8 were against the water main•on Fry; 1 for
it and 2 undecided.
0. J. Walls What is the estimated cost per foot? Nilsens Around
X3.00 to °3.10 per foot.
0. J. Walls Will the road bed be disturbed? Ljungrens It will
be. The line has to be 12 feet clear of the sanitary sewer. The
sewer is in the very center of the street. The water will go on
the west side. Storm sewer goes on the East side where the gas
main is.
Questions This is a speculative thing. How long can we depend
on our wells? Ljungrens I dontt knew how long your wells will
last.
0. J. V'Jalls Could we ask for time so we could get together with
1282 the people in Maple Knoll and discuss this further: Nilsen:
Sure you can.
Kilberg: Is it pretty much of a certainty that this will result
in higher pressure? Will pumping station and main actually bring
pressure? Ljungren: Pumping stations have done the job in the
past. It would bring your pressure up to !~3 pounds based on
your static. You will always have at least 28 pounds. The
pump is an addition to the present pressure.
Nilsen:We can continue this Fearing if you want to think it
over. There is no need to take action immediately,.
Questions I would like to ask if it is all right with the
Fry Street people to delay this for a week. Now that we are
going to be assessed for the pumping station, we should get
together and point it out to them.
Hearing After discussions it was moved by Utechts seconded try Shavor
continued and unanimously voted that. this Hearing be continued at 7:30
P. M, Monday, September 81st, 1959.
Douglas Rees The request of Douglas Rees for a building permit for an
13uiiding annex to the old National Tea. Store! together with his plot
Permit plans and. building glans were presented to the Council.
After discussion, it was moved by Shavor, seconded try Utecht
and unanimously voted that these pavers be referred to the
Village Planner for recommendation and report try Thursday,
August 27th, 1959, if possible,
Deputy Clerk It was moved by Utecht, seconded try Shavor and unanimously
Salary Raise voted that Mrs. White, the Deputy Clerk, be given X1.75 an
hour on a ~.0 hour week instead of the present X61.625, be-
ginning September lst, 1959.
Adjournment On motion, the meeting adjourned at 10:00 P. M,
Clerk.
~~~ove _
Mayor.
1