Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-15-2023 Regular Meeting-AmendedCITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS Regular Meeting of the City Council City Hall 2077 West Larpenteur Avenue AGENDA - AMENDED November 15, 2023 at 7:00 P.M. A.CALL TO ORDER: B. ROLL CALL: GUSTAFSON____ LEEHY___ MEYER ___ WASSENBERG ____ WEHYEE___ STAFF PRESENT: LINEHAN___ C.APPROVAL OF AGENDA D.PRESENTATION E.APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1.October 25, 2023 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes F.PUBLIC HEARINGS: G.CONSENT AGENDA: 1. General Disbursements through 11/08/23: $224,055.81 Payroll through 10/31/23: $21,248.22 Wire Payments through 10/31/23: $13,519.08 2.Approval of City License(s) 3. Canvassing Election Results for November 7, 2023 4.Construction Cooperation Agreement for Roselawn Avenue 5.Resolution in Support of Application for MPCA Brownfield Assessment Grant 6.2024 Ramsey County Select Committee on Recycling & The Environment (SCORE) Grant Submittal and Enter into Agreement with Ramsey County for Funding 7.City Administrator Jack Linehan – 18-Month Employee Step Adjustment 8.Finance Director Roland Olson – Pay Adjustment 9.Authorization for City Administrator to Negotiate and Approve Employee Benefit Plans 10. Release of RFP for 2024 Printing Services 11. Support for City Administrator Jack Linehan to Participate in Compass Peer Leadership Group H.POLICY ITEMS: 1. Amber Flats PUD 2. Pathway Sidewalk Maintenance Map and Plowing Update 3.Resolution Authorizing the City Administrator to Execute Grant Applications 4.Law Enforcement Contract Update 1 I. INFORMATION/ANNOUNCEMENTS: J. COMMUNITY FORUM: Please limit comments to 3 minutes per person. Items brought before the Council will be referred for consideration. Council may ask questions for clarification, but no council action or discussion will be held on these items. K. ADJOURNMENT: 2 BLANK PAGE  3 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS Regular Meeting of the City Council City Hall 2077 West Larpenteur Avenue MINUTES Wednesday, October 25, 2023 7:00 p.m. A. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 PM B. ROLL CALL: GUSTAFSON_X_ LEEHY_X_ MEYER _X_ WASSENBERG _X_ WEHYEE___ STAFF PRESENT: LINEHAN_X__ C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Administrator Linehan takes item 4. Appointment of Wesley Goldberg to the Parks and Recreation Commission of the Consent Agenda on the request of the applicant. Councilmember Leehy motions to approve the amended agenda; approved 4-0 D. PRESENTATION 1. Charitable Gambling Proceeds Donation to the Friends of the Philando Castile Peace Garden Administrator Linehan explains that the City maintains a Charitable Gambling fund that is financed by a tax on charitable gambling activity within Falcon Heights. Of the 10% funds that are collected to this fund, a portion needs to go back into the community. The funds were collected a number of years ago and it is of the best interest for the City to find a use for the fund. One of these purposes is that a contribution to a 501(c)(3) is allowable. Formal approval is recommended for the contribution of these 10% gambling funds to the 501(c)(3) “Friends of the Philando Castile Peace Garden” to assist in getting a water hookup to the site and closure of Special Revenue Fund 203. Council agrees this would benefit the volunteers, who are Falcon Heights residents as well as the Philando Castile Peace Garden, which is located in Falcon Heights and therefore benefits the community. Councilmember Meyer reads Resolution 23-69 Resolution for Contribution to The Friends of the Philando Castile Peace Garden into record. Councilmember Leehy motions to approve Resolution 23-69 Resolution for Contribution to The Friends of the Philando Castile Peace Garden into record; approved 4-0 Sue Gehrz thanks the City for this generous donation. This will help pay for a permanent water source. The Peace Garden has been an effort of this community and surrounding communities. Provides recent updates: - Signage has been installed in the garden with explanations - Planning for installation of boulders that will provide additional seating 4 - Designing proposals for lighting in the garden - Bringing back original donated artwork - Plan for virtual exhibit of the garden. They also had an art festival on September 9th at the garden, sponsored by Public Arts St. Paul. The garden is still relying on volunteers to help water, weed and maintain the garden. Councilmember Leehy adds that those interested can visit https://philandocastile- peacegarden.org/ E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. October 11, 2023 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Councilmember Wassenberg motions to approve the minutes; approved 4-0 F. PUBLIC HEARINGS: G. CONSENT AGENDA: 1. General Disbursements through 10/20/23: $154,383.15 Payroll through 10/15/23: $19,395.00 Wire Payments through 10/15/23: $12,681.96 2. City Licenses 3. 6-Month Performance Evaluation – Administrative and Communications Coordinator Elke van der Werff 4. Appointment of Wesley Goldberg to the Parks and Recreation Commission 5. Resolution in Support of Buhl Investors’ Application for Emerging and Diverse Developers Grant Funds Councilmember Meyer motions to approve the Consent Agenda; approved 4-0 Administrator Linehan thanks Council for the 6-month step adjustment for Administrative and Communications Coordinator Elke van der Werff. This position is the first-person people see or hear when interacting with the City, and Elke does a great job of listening to residents and diffusing situations. Administrator Linehan states that this Resolution in Support of Buhl Investors’ Application for Emerging and Diverse Developers Grant Funds is not a vote of any matter for the Amber Flats proposal, rather this is to help Buhl Investors with the grant application process, which they qualify for. H: POLICY ITEMS: I. INFORMATION/ANNOUNCEMENTS: Councilmember Meyer reminds everyone to get out and vote. Councilmember Leehy has no announcements. Councilmember Wassenberg reminds residents about the public engagement session for the Community Park. This will take place during the Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting on Monday, November 6 at 6:30 PM at City Hall. Mayor Gustafson announces that the Planning Commission held the first community meeting of the Snelling & Larpenteur Corridor Study on October 18 at City Hall together with the consultant WSB. Staff created a webpage where residents can fill out a community survey and 5 provide input on a community map. The Planning Commission also held a Public Hearing on October 24, regarding a proposal from Buhl Investors for the parking lot next to Amber Union. Conversations with Constitutions will be held on October 26 at the Roseville City Hall at 6:30PM where all mayors from surrounding cities will gather. Lastly, Public Works has two open positions. Administrator Linehan states that the City Council meeting for Wednesday, November 8th will be moved to Wednesday, November 15th to allow for certification of election results. Ramsey County requires certification by City Councils between November 13th – 17th. The City Council Workshop next Wednesday, November 1st will include Personnel Policy Updates, Sidewalk Snow Plowing and a Map Update as well as a 10-Year Capital Plan Budget Update. The general election is on Tuesday, November 7. Polling locations remain the same. City Hall will be a polling location, only on election day itself. Residents west of Snelling vote at City Hall, east of Snelling vote at Falcon Heights Church. The Community Engagement Commission is looking for commissioners as there are currently 3 vacancies. J. COMMUNITY FORUM: Please limit comments to 3 minutes per person. Items brought before the Council will be referred for consideration. Council may ask questions for clarification, but no council action or discussion will be held on these items. Chuck Long – 1717 Albert St. N. Chuck Long states at their last meeting on October, 24, the Planning Commission voted to approve a PUD proposal for the apartment building, Amber Flats. Before the proposal will get voted on by the City Council, Chuck asks the Council why they should make a decision about the PUD now, when the Larpenteur & Snelling Corridor Study just kicked off. He believes the City should wait for the results of the study. Ric Cox – 1639 Larpenteur Ave. Ric and his wife are residents of Roseville and business owners in Falcon Heights. Ric provides history on how they acquired the property on Larpenteur for their business and how they renovated it over time. They are interested in the development of the vacant lot located next to Amber Union and across from their property, but are asking the City to make an informed decision and await the result of the Larpenteur & Snelling Corridor Study as they are worried about parking at both properties. Ric states they need more parking at their property and are concerned they cannot expand their parking and therefore stay in Falcon Heights. K. ADJOURNMENT: 7:57 PM Councilmember Leehy motions to adjourn the meeting; approved 4-0 _______________________________ Randall C. Gustafson, Mayor Dated this 15th day of November, 2023 _________________________________ Jack Linehan, City Administrator 6 BLANK PAGE  7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 BLANK PAGE  24 Item Approval of City License(s) Description The following individuals/entities have applied for a Municipal Business License for 2024. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. Hamline Family Dental 2. Falcon Heights Gas & Convenience Inc. 3. Merwin Liquors 4. Hair Designs Unlimited 5. National Dentex Twin Cities Laboratory The following individuals/entities have applied for a Gasoline Station Operator License for 2024. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. Falcon Heights Gas & Convenience Inc. The following individuals/entities have applied for a Retail Grocery License for 2024. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. Falcon Heights Gas & Convenience Inc. The following individuals/entities have applied for a Massage Therapy for 2024. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. Hair Designs Unlimited, Ferencz Mihaly Vincze Turcean The following individuals/entities have applied for a Home Occupation License for 2024. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. Pamela M Harris PLLC 2. Weyandt Mediation PLLC The following individuals/entities have applied for a Tree Contractors License for 2024. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. The Davey Tree Expert Company 2. Precision Landscape and Tree, Inc. 3. Bratt Tree Company 4. Three Trees Horticulture Meeting Date November 15, 2023 Agenda Item Consent G2 Attachment N/A Submitted By Kelly Nelson Assistant to the City Administrator 25 The following individuals/entities have applied for a Refuse & Recycling Hauler License for 2024. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. Walters Recycling and Refuse 2. Tennis Sanitation, LLC 3. Gene’s Disposal Service Inc. 4. Curbside Waste, Inc. The following individuals/entities have applied for a Multifamily Rental Dwelling License for 2024. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. Donald Sobania; 1510 Larpenteur Ave. W. 2. Larpenteur Manor LLC; 1710, 1720, 1730 and 1740 Larpenteur Ave. W. 3. Apartments, LLC; 1845 Larpenteur Ave. W. 4. Larpenteur Crossing / Legacy Apartments, LLC; 1855 Larpenteur Ave. W. 5. Carousel Flats/Midtown 2500, LLC; 1561 Idaho, 1634 and 1642 Snelling Ave. N. 6. Larpenteur Terrace/Edwards Properties; 1504 Larpenteur Ave. W. 7. Falcon Arms/1717 Fry Company Ltd. Partnership; 1687, 1697, 1707 and 1717 Fry St. 8. Chad Johnson; 1800 and 1818 Larpenteur Ave. W. 9. PC Hendrickson, LLC; 1750 Larpenteur Ave. W. The following individuals/entities have applied for a Restaurant License for 2024. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. Jimmy John’s 2. Dino’s Gyros 3. Stout’s Pub 4. Ayvaz Pizza LLC dba Pizza Hut The following individuals/entities have applied for a Liquor License for 2024. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. Merwin Liquors 2. Dino’s Gyros 3. Stout’s Pub The following individuals/entities have applied for Holiday Tree Sales for 2023. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. Falcon Heights – Lauderdale Lions Club 2. University of Minnesota Forestry Club 26 The following individuals/entities have applied for a Car Wash License for 2024. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. Falcon Heights Gas & Convenience Inc. The following individuals/entities have applied for a Tobacco License for 2024. Staff have received the necessary documents for licensure. 1. Falcon Heights Gas & Convenience Inc. 2. Merwin Liquors N/A Attachment(s) N/A Action(s) Requested Staff recommends approval of the City license applications contingent on background checks and fire inspections as required. 27 BLANK PAGE  28 Item Canvassing Election Results Description The City is required to hold a meeting to accept and approve election results for the years that the City holds an election. I have attached a resolution to accept the results with certified results provided by Ramsey County Elections. Candidate(s) Totals Percentage Mayor (Elect 1) Randy Gustafson 1,089 95.11% Write-In 56 4.89% Council Member at Large (Elect 2) Jim Wassenberg 954 45.82% Paula Mielke 1,097 52.69% Write-In 31 1.49% Voters Registered: 3,088 Budget Impact N/A Attachment(s) •Certified Results from Ramsey County Elections •Resolution 23-71 Approving the 2023 Election Results Action(s) Requested Staff would recommend approval of attached resolution and Abstract. Meeting Date November 15, 2023 Agenda Item Consent G3 Attachment Resolution 23-71 Submitted By Jack Linehan, City Administrator 29 Abstract of Votes Cast In the Precincts of the City of Falcon Heights State of Minnesota at the Municipal and School District General Held Tuesday, November 7, 2023 as compiled from the official returns. 30 Abstract print version 40033, generated 11/8/2023 2:01:18 PM KEY TO PARTY ABBREVIATIONS NP - Nonpartisan Mayor (Falcon Heights) NP Randy Gustafson 1089 WI WRITE-IN 56 Council Member at Large (Falcon Heights) (Elect 2) NP Jim Wassenberg 954 NP Paula Mielke 1097 WI WRITE-IN 31 Summary of Totals City of Falcon Heights Tuesday, November 7, 2023 Municipal and School District General Summary of Totals City of Falcon Heights Tuesday, November 7, 2023 Municipal and School District General Number of persons registered as of 7 a.m.3088 Number of persons registered on Election Day 24 Number of accepted regular, military, and overseas absentee ballots and mail ballots 213 Number of federal office only absentee ballots 0 Number of presidential absentee ballots 0 Total number of persons voting 1304 Abstract print version 40033, generated 11/8/2023 2:01:18 PM Page 1 of 5 31 Detail of Election Results City of Falcon Heights Tuesday, November 7, 2023 Municipal and School District General Precinct Persons Registered as of 7 A.M. Persons Registered on Election Day Total Number of Persons Voting 62 0060 : FALCON HEIGHTS P-1 1424 14 556 62 0070 : FALCON HEIGHTS P-2 1664 10 748 City of Falcon Heights Total:3088 24 1304 Page 2 of 5 32 Detail of Election Results City of Falcon Heights Tuesday, November 7, 2023 Municipal and School District General Office Title: Mayor (Falcon Heights) Precinct NP Randy Gustafson WI WRITE-IN 62 0060 : FALCON HEIGHTS P-1 494 12 62 0070 : FALCON HEIGHTS P-2 595 44 Total:1089 56 Office Title: Council Member at Large (Falcon Heights) (Elect 2) Precinct NP Jim Wassenberg NP Paula Mielke WI WRITE-IN 62 0060 : FALCON HEIGHTS P-1 415 484 8 62 0070 : FALCON HEIGHTS P-2 539 613 23 Total:954 1097 31 Page 3 of 5 33 We, the legally constituted county canvassing board, certify that we have herein specified the names of the persons receiving votes and the number of votes received by each office voted on, and have specified the number of votes for and against each question voted on, at the Municipal and School District General held on Tuesday, November 7, 2023 As appears by the returns of the election precincts voting in this election, duly returned to, filed, opened, and canvassed, and now remaining on file in the office of the City of Falcon Heights Clerk. Witness our official signature at ________________________________ in _________________________ County this _____________ day of ______________, 2023. ____________________________________________________________________________ Member of canvassing board ____________________________________________________________________________ Member of canvassing board ____________________________________________________________________________ Member of canvassing board ____________________________________________________________________________ Member of canvassing board ____________________________________________________________________________ Member of canvassing board ____________________________________________________________________________ Member of canvassing board ____________________________________________________________________________ Member of canvassing board Page 4 of 5 34 State of Minnesota City of Falcon Heights I, __________________________________________________, Clerk of the City of Falcon Heights do hereby certify the within and foregoing __________________ pages to be a full and correct copy of the original abstract and return of the votes cast in the City of Falcon Heights Municipal and School District General held on Tuesday, November 7, 2023. Witness my hand and official seal of office this ________ day of ________________, 2023. ______________________________________________ Page 5 of 5 35 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS COUNCIL RESOLUTION November 15, 2023 No. 23-71 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - RESOLUTION APPROVING ABSTRACT OF VOTES CAST IN THE PRECINCTS OF THE CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS STATE OF MINNESOTA AT THE GENERAL ELECTION HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2023 WHEREAS, the City of Falcon Heights held a municipal election on November 7, 2023; and WHEREAS, the abstract of votes cast are attached and incorporated into this resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Falcon Heights City Council, sitting as members of the canvassing board, approve the abstract of votes cast attached to this resolution. Passed and Adopted by the Council on this 15th day of November 2023. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - Moved by: Approved by: ________________________ Randall C. Gustafson Mayor GUSTAFSON ___ In Favor Attested by: ________________________ MEYER Jack Linehan WASSENBERG ___ Against City Administrator LEEHY WEHYEE 36 BLANK PAGE  37 Item Approve Construction Cooperation Agreement for Street Construction on Roselawn Avenue and Order Feasibility Report Description Falcon Height’s pavement management program provides maintenance of the city’s street system as identified in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The aim of the program is to maintain the street infrastructure, provide timely maintenance to reduce long-term costs, and improve the quality of city infrastructure. Falcon Heights has identified Roselawn Avenue between Snelling Avenue (TH51) and Hamline Avenue for a mill and overlay as the 2024 Pavement Management Project. Roselawn Avenue is bordered on the north by Roseville and on the south by Falcon Heights. Roseville has also identified this segment of Roselawn Avenue for improvement in 2024, with the intent to work with Falcon Heights on this project. The project is proposed to include milling the top layer of asphalt, paving a new asphalt layer, spot curb and gutter repair and minor utility work. To document the responsibilities and costs associated with the project between Falcon Heights and Roseville, a Construction Cooperation Agreement for Street Construction on Roselawn Avenue has been drafted and is included as Attachment 1. Both City Attorneys have reviewed the document. The major terms of the agreement are as follows: • Nothing within this agreement will alter the ownership and maintenance after the project is complete. • Roseville will be the engineer and contracting agency for the project. o City of Roseville has in-house staff to complete this work and currently provides municipal engineering services to Falcon Heights. • Falcon Heights intends to assess the project to their residents adjacent to Roselawn Avenue. Roseville will provide technical assistance for the MN 429 Statute assessment process. • Roseville will prepare the project documents. Falcon Heights will need to approve the project documents prior to bid. Meeting Date November 15, 2023 Agenda Item Consent G4 Attachment Cooperative Agreement, Resolution Submitted By Stephanie Smith, Interim City Engineer 38 • If the bid is 120 percent over the estimate, Falcon Heights can notify Roseville to reject the bids. • Cost participation o Falcon Heights o 50% cost of roadway improvements o 100% cost of stormwater improvements south of Roselawn Avenue centerline o A pro-rata share of mobilization, traffic control, and similar items o $8,500, for 50% of engineering costs and 100% of the costs incurred in the assessment process o Roseville o 50% of roadway improvement costs o 100% of stormwater improvement costs north of Roselawn Avenue centerline o A pro-rata share of mobilization, traffic control, and similar items o 50% of engineering costs Staff believes the cost breakdown fairly reflects the benefits the cities both receive from the improvements. The project is scheduled to be bid in the winter of 2024 for construction in the spring/summer of 2024. A portion of the improvement cost is proposed to be assessed. The approval of the attached resolution is required for the Minnesota Chapter 429 Assessment Process to order the preparation of the feasibility report. The report will discuss the project need, estimate costs, cost effectiveness, available funding and the preliminary assessment roll. Budget Impact This project has the following financial implications for the city and property owners along the streets being considered for maintenance: • Assessments levied in accordance with the City’s assessment policy. • Use of Municipal State Aid (MSA) and street infrastructure funds to pay the City’s portion of the project. • Expenditure of utility fund dollars to pay for repairs needed to the existing utility system. Attachment(s) Cooperative Agreement Resolution 23-72 Action(s) Requested 1. Consider a motion to approve the Construction Cooperation Agreement for Street Construction on Roselawn Avenue with the City of Roseville; and 2. Approve resolution to Order Feasibility Report for Roselawn Avenue Pavement Management Project. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS COUNCIL RESOLUTION November 15, 2023 No. 23-72 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RESOLUTION ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR ROSELAWN AVENUE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT FH24-01 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights, as follows: WHEREAS, IT IS PROPOSED TO IMPROVE Roselawn Avenue between Snelling Avenue (TH 51) and Hamline Avenue and to assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota: That the proposed improvement, called Improvement FH24-01, Roselawn Avenue Pavement Management Project, be referred to the Interim-City Engineer for study and that the engineer is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels. Adopted by the Falcon Heights City Council this 15th day of November, 2023. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moved by: Approved by: Randall C. Gustafson Mayor GUSTAFSON ____ In Favor Attested by: LEEHY Jack Linehan MEYER ____ Against City Administrator WASSENBERG WEHYEE 49 BLANK PAGE  50 Item Support of MPCA Brownfield Assessment Grant Application for Get Pressed Property Environmental Site Assessment Description Brownfields are abandoned, blighted, or underused properties where reuse is complicated by potential or actual contamination. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has grant money available to fund investigation of previous uses of properties to support redevelopment and reuse. The work is performed by MPCA contractors at no cost to the grant recipients. Funding comes from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1407 Larpenteur Ave W, the site of the former Get Pressed dry-cleaning business, is a property that has been condemned and has been identified as a source of blight within the community. Recently there have been discussions about possible redevelopment there to include residential townhomes, however this cannot occur without first having an environmental site assessment and potential mitigation plan taking place. As the property was a dry-cleaner and, prior to that, a gas station, there are suspected contaminants located on site. This grant would allow for the investigation and reporting efforts to commence. Budget Impact N/A Attachment(s) • Resolution 23-73 in Support of MPCA Brownfield Assessment Grant Application for Get Pressed Property Environmental Site Assessment • MPCA Brownfield Investigation Grant Application Action(s) Requested Staff recommend approval of resolution in support of application for MPCA Brownfield Assessment Grant for environmental site assessment at 1407 Larpenteur Ave W. Meeting Date November 15, 2023 Agenda Item Consent G5 Attachment Resolution 23-73 Submitted By Hannah Lynch, Community Development Coordinator 51 November 2, 2023 VIA EMAIL Minnesota Pollution Control Agency – Brownfield Assessment Grant brownfieldgrants.MPCA@state.mn.us RE: Request for MPCA Brownfield Assessment Grant Application Dear MPCA Brownfield Assessment Grant Coordinators: Please consider this letter a request on behalf of Sarin Homes, LLC for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Brownfield Assessment Grant for “Get Pressed” located at 1407 Larpenteur Ave W, Falcon Heights, MN 55113, Ramsey County. The property is shown on the attached map and includes .50 acres of land. The property is presently owned by Sarin Homes, LLC. The property is presently an unused site with a condemned dry cleaning building on it and is being considered for potential redevelopment. We understand that we will be contacted by the MPCA Brownfield Assessment Grant coordinators to inform us of the outcome of our application. I can be reached at 651.792.7613 or hannah.b.lynch@falconheights.org Sincerely, Hannah B. Lynch cc: Lee Sarin 52 Brownfield Assessment Grant Application MPCA Brownfield Program Doc Type: Brownfield Assessment Grant Application Instructions: Please fill out Section 1. Site Eligibility to determine if your property meets the basic requirements. If questions 1-4 indicate the property is eligible to be considered for the Brownfield Assessment Grant, continue with the remaining questions. Provide as much information as you can for each question and contact us if you need help. Please attach this completed form to the cover letter (see page 4) and attach any other supporting information (pictures, support letters, etc.) and email the package to brownfieldgrants.MPCA@state.mn.us. Section 1. Property Eligibility 1. Is there known or potential contamination on the Property that hinders the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of the Property? Yes No Stop. Funding is only available for properties with known or potential environmental contamination 2. To the best of your knowledge, does the property fall into any of the following categories? (If you need help with this, please contact Shanna Schmitt at 651-757-2697 or shanna.schmitt@state.mn.us.) Yes No Is the property the subject of a planned or ongoing removal/cleanup under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)? CERCLA/Federal Superfund site lookup. Yes No Is the property an active site listed or proposed for listing on the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) National Priority List (NPL), or a portion of an active NPL site? CERCLA/Superfund site lookup. Yes No Is the property the subject of a unilateral administrative order, a court order, an administrative order on consent, or judicial consent decrees issued to or entered into by the parties under CERCLA, the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA), the Federal Water Pollution Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), or the Safe Drinking Water Act? Yes No Is the property owned by the U.S. government, not including land held in trust by the U.S. for an Indian tribe? Yes No Is there a polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) release on the property that is subject to remediation under the TSCA (i.e., PCB concentrations greater than 50 parts per million)? Yes No Is the property a closed permitted landfill? Yes No Is the property an active site listed or proposed for listing on the Minnesota Permanent List of Priorities (PLP), or a portion of an active PLP Site? PLP/State Superfund site lookup on the What’s in My Neighborhood online application. If “yes” is checked in any of the categories above, the project is not eligible for a Brownfield Assessment Grant – Stop. 3. Is the applicant a potentially responsible party that has caused or contributed to the contamination at the property, including petroleum, non-petroleum, or agricultural contamination? Yes Stop – Funding cannot be used to assist potential responsible parties. No 4. Does the applicant have, or can it obtain, access to the entire property? Yes An Access Agreement will be emailed to the applicant once the MPCA approves the application. No Stop – The MPCA cannot proceed without access to the property. 5. If contamination has been identified at the property, does a potential responsible party exist? Yes List the entity: Note: Answering yes does not necessarily mean the project is not eligible. No If the property is eligible, please continue to complete application. 53 Section 2. Property Description 1. Provide the property name and any aliases or historic names the property is known by. A current project name will also work. Get Pressed Dry Cleaners, One Hour Martinizing 2. List the street address of the property, the city, county, and parcel identification number(s). 1407 Larpenteur Ave W, Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Ramsey County, MN PIN 152923340061, 152923340062 3. List the size of the property, in acres. Two Parcels, .21 acres and .29 acres 4. Submit a map of the property that clearly shows the outline of the property boundary (look on your County’s property map page). 5. List and describe any known or suspected areas of contamination and contaminants of concern at the property. Previously a dry cleaning location and a gas station. We've been told the old tanks are in the ground but are capped. The most recent use of a dry cleaner took the items off site, but in the past the work was done on site. Known or suspected sources/wastes – Indicate if the sources of contamination/wastes are known (“K”) or suspected (“S”): Foundry sand S Surface spills S Routine industrial operations Transformer Dumping or buried drums Burning of materials K Underground pipeline or tank Lagoon S Contaminated building Industrial accident Aboveground pipeline or tank Fly ash Old, imported fill Other (specify): Past use of the property – Indicate if the sources of contamination/wastes are known (“K”) or suspected (“S”): K Service station Salvage yard Pipeline K Drycleaner Coal gas manufacturer Electroplater Manufacturing Unknown Bulk plant Tannery Landfill (dump) Other (specify): 6. Identify the current landowner: Name: Sarin Homes LLC Mailing address: 1693 Ridgewood Ln N City: Roseville State: MN Zip code: 55113 Phone: 612.817.6774 Email: lhsarin@gmail.com 7. How did the current landowner acquire the property? Purchase Donation Tax forfeit Payment in lieu of taxes Date of acquisition (mm/dd/yyyy): 7/30/2018 8. Is there a potential health, safety, or ecological concern at the property? Check all that apply. The property is currently occupied by residents or employees. The property poses a physical hazard to trespassers. The contamination at the property may be affecting residents or employees of adjacent properties. The property includes, or is adjacent to, a sensitive ecological area. 54 Section 3. Proposed Project Details 1. Is there a confirmed end user in place for the property? Yes Explain: Yes A developer is in place, but no final end users confirmed: The current owner is wanting to redevelop the property. We are also including it in a current study for redevelopment at the city level. No Project is included in the community’s master plan or being evaluated for redevelopment. No Property is not included in community’s master plan or being evaluated for redevelopment. 2. Describe the proposed future use of the property (residential, recreational, commercial, industrial, green space, etc.): The most recent proposed future use of the property is for ten townhomes on the site. 3. Is this a community driven project or does it have strong support within the community? Yes Describe how the project benefits the community. What steps have been taken and/or are planned to engage the local community? List the community groups that are active in the project area. Currently the property is an eyesore. The building is condemned. No use can be made of the current property without it being cleaned up and the building either being completely renovated or demolished. We have held community meetings to talk to neighbors about the potential for townhomes. We are also currently including the property in a study to determine the best future use of our two main city corridors. The community supports something happening there. It seems like residential is the best fit. It's more of a question of how many units to put on the property, rather than if it should or should not be residential. No Unknown at this time. Explain below: 4. Provide a general timeframe for assessment activities that need to be performed. We'd prefer as soon as possible since nothing can happen there until an assessment is completed, but we don't have a set deadline currently. 5. Has a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) been completed? Yes No If yes, please submit a PDF copy of the Phase I ESA with this application. 6. Have Phase II Environmental Site Assessment(s) been completed? Yes No If yes, please submit PDF copies of any Phase II ESAs with this application. Section 4. Information Certification I certify that the information provided in this application, the cover letter, and any attachments are true and correct. Note: Environmental Consultants cannot sign applications. Electronic signatures are accepted. Applicant Print name: Hannah B. Lynch Title: Community Development Coordinator / Planner Signature: Date (mm/dd/yyyy): Phone: 651.792.7613 Email: hannah.b.lynch@falconheights.org 55 56 University of Minnesota Bolstad Golf Course University of Minnesota Bolstad Golf Course Community Park CurtissField Grove Park 20332275 15362100 2100 1393 1840 1666 1695 1710-1740 2025 1667 2077 1601 1750 1687-1707 2129 1840 1533-1557 1857 1643-16691781 1639 1875 1847 1815 1892 1865 1859 1887 1825 2097 1805 1763 1739 1784 1644 1764 1818 1795 17901800 15511850174118601717 1865 1875 1611 1755 17082038 1783 1830184517071785 19 5 8 1795 1844 18551757 1775 1765 1761 1725 1757 1795 1749 1900 1794 1749 1757 1746 1769 1729 1747 1710 17751776 19 6 8 1756 1728 1766 1720 1734 1735 1739 1718 1710 1700 1905 1777 1800 1767 1737 1893 1786 1735 1725 1910 177118402048 1757 1758 1731 14111782 1733 1717 1737 1709 1700 20971704 1710 1727 1716 1724 1763 1732 1771 1740 1746 1750 1758 1764 1770 1728 178818701880159216071804 1750 170717881821 1707 1776 13471365202818671745 1717 1707 1642 13501895 1691 139717751776 17811780 1789 17971984 198 1 1803 1911 19051775 1755 1794 18671868 1723 1867 1868 1879 1892 1900 1881 1891 1901 1765 17252008201819781801 15 92 1923 1576 1885 1836 1806 1586 158215821683 14361634 225217261988199817541736 1888 1750 1880 14071712 18711713 1603 217917971920 187718701885188019101728 1703 13711720 1701 14921736 1742 1754 1804 1777 1711 1768 21971868 2189174819801869 2099 1813195821231760 2203214319421715 187519712137137516651870 1878 1884 1892 1896 1906 1912 16181903 1864 153219381875 19 1 8 1885 1849 1701 1887 1888 1893 1892 1842 1854 1588 1805 21171869 1877 1700 1883 19661838 1889 1897 1880 1811 1905 1572 1913 220213971807 1849 1718 1821 1827 1835 1843 1615 1905 1897 1869 1930210521152124158321211891 1789 1842 1646 1836 1828 2111196916281826 145313941854 1837 1810 21592173215121611818 1853 1819 1812 1842 1749 1741 1727 1837 1818 18351840 18431848 18491852 18571860 21291864 1865 1872 1869 1878 1877 1938 18811884 18911892 1853 1847 18971898 16551906 1745 1820 1710 16421834 1827 20152007198719971845 1847 1911 17351829 1578 1604 2190 1905 1802 1879 1882 1564 1889 1766 1565 1907 1776 18651802 1756 1746 1571 188819 2 2 1911 150415961791 1572 1837 19111856 1803 1864 14361974148614662225 147215101842 1711 21401730 1740 1852 1808 1860 15111861 1816 1854 1870197719531890 1551211115221830 1633 1811 1900 16101626 1579 1913 186319351891 1883 18621929 1653 21291811 1905 1824 1853 1857 1831 1389187919981906 2243 1870 1805 1878 1775 1776180117951800 1751 1864 1765 1733 1588 15251707 1755 216522251892 1406139114231412138114161468148514701513137214801452144214461432143314071413138615031469147713581354142214331422144313871464136814061506149014961854 14441597 1915 1643 162521482154217021601958 1753 1771 1759 1777 1783 176518051871 1879 164515961656 151118711872 218016352098 1876 1880 1873 1887 1901 1893 1905 1892 1915 1900 18991900 1908 19071908 1914 14701912 1700 1947 18231961 14541966 1715 1837 1579 1853 1815 21181697 221117911941 21351877 19071529213216151863 214721532141223115471781 1546153118101906 15251884 21122203 1799 1700 1570 15371896 15692303 1865 1871 1877 1914 1883 1889 1897 1905 18991913 16951740182618401850 22171906 18601561 1779 158722912243 1720162717301746148817601770215917801706 2297226122852298 1462220816301739 1575 1745 224922551746 1701 1705 1725 1580 179518311800 15231796 1588 1765 1419146814741816 1478227914841874 1771 1844 1488149614691834 1504146315061743 1824 151013571381151621051700 1753 1765 1771 1868 1706 22161892 210816111711 1825 1580 1723 1830 1754 1910 22671802 151215401803 1880 1775 172517351802 16241717 1803 1801 1724 15221781 1914 1820 15891802 22731576 1824 222214451803 15971811 1570 1757 17131712 17171716 17231722 17291728 17351734 17411740 17471744 17531754 17571758 17651764 17711770 1776 1775 1791 1784 1783 1790 1811 1791 1756 195718091886 17441745174417451744 17541755175417551750 1758175917581758 1764176517641764 1770177117701770 1776177717761776 1784178517841784 1790179117901790 1795 1794179417951794 1745 18161817 1755 181618171816 1824182518251824 18281829 1759 18291830 18341835183418351834 1618184018411840 1765 18411840 18461847184618471846 185218531854 1771 1853 1858185918581859 1782 186418651864 1775 1865 15341785 1791 1795 1811 1817 1835 1841 1847 1853 1859 1865 1733 1766 1712 15261896 185115321582 15381770 1850 1828 1810 1718 15301864 154016121810 154614972271 160314411808 162513491810 139022861732 1829 14721485150216171732 1790 1759 22911564 15242292168813451473148014841564 1389146917181717171817151539 17241725172417251724 1728173117291728 173217351731 174017411741 1717 1725 14751483149114951731 1735 1741 15051583 15491571 1543138215982285154215291375147214791536153515391367159013721738 1357160713762279137714371395139615451390138713861368140213591608146813751464136913581376135413651355150813811364134813401412145713591349142713801402140313551387135415131341139514031453141815121391140313491391135813681484143713761380138614171402141314021426143414561348147115031477144714561366136013901412140713571340144614521408136914421489151313611364150314931494149014571453150414941365134114381430146714461471148916041467142614431468143313961456145714271358148214781395137914361493148114771497138114521481142914931488137314261416142214711497143214851497146314421485143314521437140614131498141514951483150714631502144614891425151214371447141714271361141613751365138214631507149113761410147614561463136214641447145714531453141714361906 1591 1930 1659 16161636 1938 1964 1948 1927 1997 1974 1654 1937 16091954 1975 1965 1916 19571994 1660 2280175117611771177517171821186118411577 1595 1589 16031595 1534-1550 1589 1583 1423142213961507144315081442142313671407144914991503149814431405140316331617164916411673 16251609160116571665 18811885 189718891893 15301703-17111740 1836 1826 2088 2050 1785 FAIRVIEW AVE NLARPENTEUR AVE W INTERCAMPUS TRANSIT WCLEVELAND AVE NALBERT ST NARONA STUNDERWOOD ST NGORTNER AVETATUM STGARDEN AVEHOLTON STCOMMONWEALTH AVE FRY STRANDALL AVE W SNELLING AVE NSNELLING AVE NSNELLING AVE NSNELLING AVE NQUESTWOOD DR BUFORD AVE IOWA AVE WASBURY STCOOPER ST NSIMPSON STJUDSON AVE WLINDIG STCOSGROVE ST NBUFORD PL KNAPP STCOFFMAN STFOLWELL AVE RUGGLES ST JUDSON AVE WFORDSTECKLES AVEDAN PATCH AVE CRAWFORD AVE SAINT MARYS STRUGGLES AVE MOORE STNELSON ST NLEE AVE STEVENS ST NBUFORD C IR MAPLE CT LIGGETT ST NAUTUMN ST FITCH AVE LINDIG AVEARONA AVE NCLOUGH ST NFIFIEL D P LBURTON STVINCENT STMAPLE KNOLL DR HOLLYWOOD CT COSGROVE STSNELLING AVE N TO COMO AVECARTER AVE N ECKLES AVE NSNELLING AVE NMINNESOTA AVE W SNELLING AVE NCALIFORNIA AVE W MURPHY AVE PRIOR AVE N PRIOR AVE NHOYT AVE W CARTER AVE N BOYD AVEGARDEN AVE HENDON AVE SUMMER ST SHELDON STCARTER AVE FOLWELL AV E DUDLEY AVEPRIOR AVE NFIFIELD STALBERT ST NPRIOR AVE NHOWELL ST NTATUM STTATUM STLINDIG STFAIRVIEW AVE NUP PE R B U F O RD C I RUP P E R B U F OR D C I R BUFORD AVE RANDALL AVE WMINNESOTA AVE WNELSON ST NDAN PATCH AVE JUDSON AVE W LARPENTEUR AVE W FAIRGROU N D ST WCOOPER ST NCOSGROVE ST NCOSGROVE ST NCOOPER ST NUNDERWOOD ST NUNDERWOOD ST NUNDERWOOD ST NWRIGHT AVE W RANDALL AVE WRANDALL AVE W COOPER ST NUNDERWOOD ST NCOOPER ST NUNDERWOOD ST NHOYT AVE WFRY STSAINT MARYS STFRY STGARDEN AVE GARDENAVE GARDEN AVE GARDEN AVEASBURY STARONA STSIMPSON STRUGGLES STASBURY STARONA STSIMPSON STPASCAL ST NPASCAL ST NPASCAL ST NCRAWFORD AVE ARONA STPASCAL ST NHOLTON STHOLTON STALBERT ST NHOLTON STLARPENTEUR AVE W LARPENTEUR AVE W ARONA STPASCAL ST NCALIFORNIA AVE W CALIFORNIA AVE W ALBERT ST NALBERT ST NPASCAL ST NIDAHO AVE W IDAHO AVE W IDAHO AVE W HOYT AVE W HOYT AVE W HOYT AVE W IDAHO AVE W IOWA AVE WIOWA AVE WIOWA AVE W HOYT AVE W HAMLINE AVE NHAMLINE AVE NHAMLINE AVE NHAMLINE AVE NROSELAWN AVE W ROSELAWN AVE W ROSELAWN AVE W ROSELAWN AVE WROSELAWN AVE W LARPENTEUR AVE WLARPENTEUR AVE WLARPENTEUR AVE WLARPENTEUR AVE WLARPENTEUR AVE WLARPENTEUR AVE W CLEVELAND AVE NMAPLE CTROSELAWN AVE W ROSELAWN AVE W HAMLINE AVE NUNDERWOOD ST NJUDSON AVE W KNAPP S T GIBBS A V E GIBBS AVE GIBBS AVE FIFIELD STFIFIELD AVECOMMONWEALTH AVECOMMONWEALTH AVE CARTERAVE N FITCH AVEGORTNER AVEGORTNER AVEBUFORD AVE BUFORD AVEBUFORD CIRBUFOR D CI R RANDALL AVE W BUFORD PL GORTNER AVEROSELAWN AVE W GORTNER AVEDUDLEY AVE ROSELAWN AVE WROSELAWN AVE W CLEVELAND AVE NFULHAM STFULHAM STFULHAM STNORTHROP AVECOFFMAN STFULHAM STHOYT AVE W HOYT AVE W HOYT AVE W CLEVELAND AVE NFOLWELL AVE FOLWELL AVE 0 300 700 1000 1000 Feet BaseMap LPrepared by: City of Roseville Engineering Department 4/26/2023 Base Map DISCLAIMER:This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records,informationand data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to beused for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare thismap are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purposerequiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepanciesare found please contact 651-792-7075. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21(2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, andagrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or thirdparties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. Data Sources and Contacts: * Ramsey County GIS Base Map (4/03/23) * City of Roseville Engineering Department For further information regarding the contents of this map contact: City of Roseville, Engineering Department, 2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville MN * 57 University of MinnesotaBolstad Golf CourseUniversity of MinnesotaBolstad Golf Course CommunityPark CurtissFieldGrovePark 20332275 15362100 2100 13931840166616951710-17402025 16672077160117501687-17072129 18401533-15571857 1643-16691781 163918751847181518921865 18591887182520971805176317391784164417641818 17951790180015511850174118601717186518751611175517082038178318301845170717851958179518441855 175717751765176117251757179517491900179417491757174617691729174717101775177619681756172817661720173417351739171817101700190517771800176717371893178617351725191017711840204817571758173114111782173317171737170917002097170417101727171617241763173217711740174617501758176417701728178818701880159216071804175017071788182117071776 1347136520281867174517171707 1642 13501895 1691 139717751776178117801789179719841981180319111905177517551794186718681723186718681879189219001881189119011765172520082018197818011592192315761885183618061586158215821683143616342252172619881998175417361888175018801407171218711713160321791797192018771870188518801910172817031371172017011492173617421754180417771711176821971868218917481980186920991813195821231760220321431942171518751971213713751665187018781884189218961906191216181903186415321938187519181885184917011887188818931892184218541588180521171869187717001883196618381889189718801811190515721913220213971807184917181821182718351843161519051897186919302105211521241583212118911789184216461836182821111969162818261453139418541837181021592173215121611818185318191812184217491741172718371818183518401843184818491852185718602129186418651872186918781877193818811884189118921853184718971898165519061745182017101642183418272015200719871997184518471911173518291578160421901905180218791882156418891766156519071776186518021756174615711888192219111504159617911572183719111856180318641436197414861466222514721510184217112140173017401852180818601511186118161854187019771953189015512111152218301633181119001610162615791913186319351891188318621929165321291811190518241853185718311389187919981906224318701805187817751776180117951800175118641765173315881525170717552165222518921406139114231412138114161468148514701513137214801452144214461432143314071413138615031469147713581354142214331422144313871464136814061506149014961854144415971915164316252148215421702160195817531771175917771783176518051871187916451596165615111871187221801635209818761880187318871901189319051892191519001899190019081907190819141470191217001947182319611454196617151837157918531815211816972211179119412135187719071529213216151863214721532141223115471781154615311810190615251884211222031799170015701537189615692303186518711877191418831889189719051899191316951740182618401850221719061860156117791587229122431720162717301746148817601770215917801706229722612285229814622208163017391575174522492255174617011705172515801795183118001523179615881765141914681474181614782279148418741771184414881496146918341504146315061743182415101357138115162105170017531765177118681706221618922108161117111825158017231830175419102267180215121540180318801775172517351802162417171803180117241522178119141820158918022273157618242222144518031597181115701757171317121717171617231722172917281735173417411740174717441753175417571758176517641771177017761775179117841783179018111791175619571809188617441745174417451744175417551754175517501758175917581758176417651764176417701771177017701776177717761776178417851784178417901791179017901795179417941795179417451816181717551816181718161824182518251824182818291759182918301834183518341835183416181840184118401765184118401846184718461847184618521853185417711853185818591858185917821864186518641775186515341785179117951811181718351841184718531859186517331766171215261896185115321582153817701850182818101718153018641540161218101546149722711603144118081625134918101390228617321829147214851502161717321790175922911564152422921688134514731480148415641389146917181717171817151539172417251724172517241728173117291728173217351731174017411741171717251475148314911495173117351741150515831549157115431382159822851542152913751472147915361535153913671590137217381357160713762279137714371395139615451390138713861368140213591608146813751464136913581376135413651355150813811364134813401412145713591349142713801402140313551387135415131341139514031453141815121391140313491391135813681484143713761380138614171402141314021426143414561348147115031477144714561366136013901412140713571340144614521408136914421489151313611364150314931494149014571453150414941365134114381430146714461471148916041467142614431468143313961456145714271358148214781395137914361493148114771497138114521481142914931488137314261416142214711497143214851497146314421485143314521437140614131498141514951483150714631502144614891425151214371447141714271361141613751365138214631507149113761410147614561463136214641447145714531453141714361906159119301659161616361938196419481927199719741654193716091954197519651916195719941660228017511761177117751717182118611841157715951589160315951534-155015891583 1423142213961507144315081442142313671407144914991503149814431405140316331617164916411673 1625160916011657166518811885189718891893 15301703-17111740 1836182620882050 1785FAIRVIEW AVE NLARPENTEUR AVE W INTERCAMPUS TRANSIT WCLEVELAND AVE NALBERT ST NARONA STUNDERWOOD ST NGORTNER AVETATUM STGARDEN AVEHOLTON STCOMMONWEALTH AVE FRY STRANDALL AVE W SNELLING AVE NSNELLING AVE NSNELLING AVE NSNELLING AVE NQUESTWOOD DR BUFORD AVE IOWA AVE WASBURY STCOOPER ST NSIMPSON STJUDSON AVE WLINDIG STCOSGROVE ST NBUFORD PL KNAPP STCOFFMAN STFOLWELL AVE RUGGLES ST JUDSON AVE WFORDSTECKLES AVEDAN PATCH AVE CRAWFORD AVESAINT MARYS STRUGGLES AVEMOORE STNELSON ST NLEE AVE STEVENS ST NBUFORD C IR MAPLE CT LIGGETT ST NAUTUMN ST FITCH AVE LINDIG AVEARONA AVE NCLOUGH ST NFIFIEL D P LBURTON STVINCENT STMAPLE KNOLL DRHOLLYWOOD CTCOSGROVE STSNELLING AVE N TO COMO AVECARTER AVE N ECKLES AVE NSNELLING AVE NMINNESOTA AVE W SNELLING AVE NCALIFORNIA AVE WMURPHY AVEPRIOR AVE NPRIOR AVE NHOYT AVE W CARTER AVE N BOYD AVEGARDEN AVE HENDON AVESUMMER ST SHELDON STCARTER AVE FOLWELL AVE DUDLEY AVEPRIOR AVE NFIFIELD STALBERT ST NPRIOR AVE NHOWELL ST NTATUM STTATUM STLINDIG STFAIRVIEW AVE NUPPER BUFORD CIRUPPER BUFORD CIR BUFORD AVE RANDALL AVE WMINNESOTA AVE WNELSON ST NDAN PATCH AVE JUDSON AVE W LARPENTEUR AVE W FAIRGROU N D ST WCOOPER ST NCOSGROVE ST NCOSGROVE ST NCOOPER ST NUNDERWOOD ST NUNDERWOOD ST NUNDERWOOD ST NWRIGHT AVE W RANDALL AVE WRANDALL AVE W COOPER ST NUNDERWOOD ST NCOOPER ST NUNDERWOOD ST NHOYT AVE WFRY STSAINT MARYS STFRY STGARDEN AVE GARDENAVE GARDEN AVE GARDEN AVEASBURY STARONA STSIMPSON STRUGGLES STASBURY STARONA STSIMPSON STPASCAL ST NPASCAL ST NPASCAL ST NCRAWFORD AVE ARONA STPASCAL ST NHOLTON STHOLTON STALBERT ST NHOLTON STLARPENTEUR AVE W LARPENTEUR AVE WARONA STPASCAL ST NCALIFORNIA AVE W CALIFORNIA AVE WALBERT ST NALBERT ST NPASCAL ST NIDAHO AVE W IDAHO AVE W IDAHO AVE WHOYT AVE W HOYT AVE W HOYT AVE W IDAHO AVE WIOWA AVE WIOWA AVE WIOWA AVE W HOYT AVE W HAMLINE AVE NHAMLINE AVE NHAMLINE AVE NHAMLINE AVE NROSELAWN AVE W ROSELAWN AVE W ROSELAWN AVE WROSELAWN AVE WROSELAWN AVE W LARPENTEUR AVE WLARPENTEUR AVE WLARPENTEUR AVE WLARPENTEUR AVE WLARPENTEUR AVE WLARPENTEUR AVE W CLEVELAND AVE NMAPLE CTROSELAWN AVE W ROSELAWN AVE W HAMLINE AVE NUNDERWOOD ST NJUDSON AVE W KNAPP S T GIBBS A V E GIBBS AVE GIBBS AVE FIFIELD STFIFIELD AVECOMMONWEALTH AVECOMMONWEALTH AVE CARTERAVE N FITCH AVEGORTNER AVEGORTNER AVEBUFORD AVE BUFORD AVEBUFORD CIRBUFORD CIR RANDALL AVE W BUFORD PL GORTNER AVEROSELAWN AVE W GORTNER AVEDUDLEY AVEROSELAWN AVE WROSELAWN AVE W CLEVELAND AVE NFULHAM STFULHAM STFULHAM STNORTHROP AVECOFFMAN STFULHAM STHOYT AVE W HOYT AVE W HOYT AVE W CLEVELAND AVE NFOLWELL AVEFOLWELL AVE 0 300 700 1000 1000 Feet BaseMap LPrepared by: City of Roseville Engineering Department 4/26/2023 Base Map DISCLAIMER:This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records,informationand data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to beused for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare thismap are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purposerequiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepanciesare found please contact 651-792-7075. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21(2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, andagrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or thirdparties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. Data Sources and Contacts: * Ramsey County GIS Base Map (4/03/23) * City of Roseville Engineering Department For further information regarding the contents of this map contact: City of Roseville, Engineering Department, 2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville MN *58 * 59 * 60 61 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS COUNCIL RESOLUTION November 15, 2023 No. 23-73 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF MPCA BROWNFIELD ASSESSMENT GRANT APPLICATION FOR GET PRESSED PROPERTY ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has grant funds available to fund investigation of previous uses of properties to support redevelopment and reuse; and WHEREAS, the program provides MPCA contractors and staff to perform technical reviews and approve work plans, investigation reports, and cleanup plans to ensure environmental concerns are properly addressed during site redevelopment at no cost to the grant recipients; and WHEREAS, the site of the former dry-cleaning business, Get Pressed, located at 1407 Larpenteur Ave W is a site where redevelopment has been proposed; and WHEREAS, redevelopment of the site cannot begin until an environmental site assessment and mitigation plan has been developed due to possible contaminants on the site from the dry- cleaning work and from the former use as a gas station. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota: 1. That the City fully supports the application to seek funding from the MPCA for a Phase I environmental site assessment for the property located at 1407 Larpenteur Ave W, Ramsey County Tax Parcels 152923340061 and 152923340062. 2. That the Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized to execute all necessary documents. Adopted by the Falcon Heights City Council this 15th day of November, 2023. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moved by: Approved by: ________________________ Randall C. Gustafson GUSTAFSON Mayor LEEHY MEYER ____ In Favor Attested by: ________________________ WEHYEE Jack Linehan WASSENBERG ____ Against City Administrator 62 BLANK PAGE  63 Item 2024 Ramsey County Select Committee on Recycling & The Environment (SCORE) Grant Submittal and Enter Into Agreement with Ramsey County for Funding Description The City of Falcon Heights has a long standing history of working with Ramsey County to increase participation in City Wide Recycling Services. The SCORE Grant helps the City to perform these services and to increase the participation rate through education, events, and a diversity of the activities. The results of these actives contribute to our high participation rate and will continue to do so into the future. Our estimated allocation for 2024 from Ramsey County is $15,268. Budget Impact Funds from the SCORE grant are used for a number of recycling efforts in the city. Attachment(s) •Resolution 23-74 Authorization to Apply for the Select Committee on Recycling & the Environment (SCORE) Grant Action(s) Requested Staff recommend approval of attached resolution authorizing application of the 2024 SCORE grant. The grant is in the estimated amount of $15,268. Meeting Date November 15, 2023 Agenda Item Consent G6 Attachment Resolution 23-74 Submitted By Hannah Lynch, Community Development Coordinator 64 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS COUNCIL RESOLUTION November 15, 2023 No. 23-74 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE 2024 RAMSEY COUNTY SELECT COMMITTEE ON RECYCLING & THE ENVIRONMENT (SCORE) GRANT SUBMITTAL AND ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH RAMSEY COUNTY FOR FUNDING WHEREAS, the City of Falcon Heights has a recycling program, which serves the residents of the City; and WHEREAS, the City utilizes the Select Committee on Recycling & the Environment (SCORE) Grant funding to offset costs of that program each year; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that participation in this program is beneficial to the residents of Falcon Heights. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota: 1. Direct staff to apply for the Select Committee on Recycling & the Environment (SCORE) Grant funding to offset costs of the program. 2. Authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to execute all necessary documents. ADOPTED by the Falcon Heights City Council this 15th day of November, 2023. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moved by: Approved by: ________________________ Randall C. Gustafson GUSTAFSON Mayor LEEHY MEYER ____ In Favor Attested by: ________________________ WEHYEE Jack Linehan WASSENBERG ____ Against City Administrator 65 BLANK PAGE  66 Item City Administrator (Jack Linehan) - Eighteen Month Employee Step Adjustment Description Jack Linehan, City Administrator began his employment with the City on May 2, 2022. Jack has completed his first eighteen (18) months with the City. It is the practice of the City to reward after the eighteen-month probationary period with up to a 5% step increase in their base salary. Budget Impact There are available funds budgeted for this step adjustment. Attachment(s) N/A Action(s) Requested I recommend that the Falcon Heights City Council approve a 5% step adjustment for Jack Linehan effective November 2, 2023. Meeting Date November 15, 2023 Agenda Item Consent G7 Attachment N/A Submitted By Randy Gustafson, Mayor 67 BLANK PAGE  68 Item Finance Director Roland Olson – Pay Adjustment Description Roland Olson, Finance Director, has been with the City of Falcon Heights for 25 years. The last adjustment to his pay, outside of a cost of living adjustment, was in 2019. Our pay structure provides increases at 6-months, 18-months, 5-years and 10- years. Employees who have greater than 10-years of service tend to see their pay stagnate. From time to time, the City will adjust for seniority to ensure internal pay equity is maintained. It is recommended in this instance/ Budget Impact There are available funds budgeted for this step adjustment. Attachment(s) N/A Action(s) Requested I recommend that the Falcon Heights City Council approve a 3% step adjustment for Roland Olson effective November 15, 2023. Meeting Date November 15, 2023 Agenda Item Consent G8 Attachment N/A Submitted By Jack Linehan, City Administrator 69 BLANK PAGE  70 Item Authorization for City Administrator to Negotiate and Approve Employee Benefit Plans Description Ramsey County, earlier in 2023, dropped the employee benefits coverage that the City had with Ramsey County for 2024 and beyond. The City has been actively looking for coverage from other sources. The City has been waiting weeks for benefit information. It is now finally starting to arrive. As the end of 2023 is fast approaching, it is paramount that these employee benefit decisions be made since these benefits need to be on line by January 1, 2024 and available to the employees in early December so they can make informed decisions about the benefits. As the year-end crunch is fast approaching with the tax hearing, and other year-end City business , staff needs to be able to complete the negotiations and finalize the arrangements for these employee benefits. Staff requests that the City Administrator finalize the negotiations and enroll the City in these employee benefits plans. Budget Impact Employee benefits are part of the compensation package for all the full time employees and budgeted in the annual budget. Attachment(s) Action(s) Requested Staff recommends council approval for the City Administrator to conclude the negotiations with the outside benefit carriers and execute the agreements so the employee benefits are available for employee review and effective for January 1, 2024. Meeting Date November 15, 2023 Agenda Item Consent G9 Attachment Submitted By Roland Olson, Finance Director 71 BLANK PAGE  72 Item Release of RFP for 2024 Printing Services Description The attached Request for Proposals (RFP) will notify vendors that the City is accepting proposals for printing services for 2024 for the City’s bi-annual Newsletter and potential other mailings. Since 2019, Falcon Heights has utilized service of Rengel Printing Co. located in St. Cloud, MN. The City would like to accept proposals for printing services to compare fees and delivery timelines. The City will begin accepting proposals from qualified vendors from November 16, 2023 through December 06, 2023. Proposals should include printer qualifications, scope of services offered, samples, fee schedule and any additional information the vendor feels is applicable. Proposals will be evaluated based on the proposed turnaround time from receipt of a draft newsletter to delivery to the post office, compensation schedule and printing samples. Budget Impact The 2024 draft budget includes costs for printing services Attachment(s) • Request for Proposals for 2024 Printing Services Action(s) Requested Staff recommends that City Council allow the City to advertise the RFP and solicit responses for 2024 Printing Services. Meeting Date November 15, 2023 Agenda Item Consent G10 Attachment(s) Request for Proposals for 2024 Printing Services Submitted By Elke van der Werff, Administrative & Communications Coordinator 73 November 15, 2023 REQUEST FOR BIDS The City of Falcon Heights 2024 Printing Services Bid Submittal Deadline: Wednesday, December 06, 2023 at 4:30 PM Prepared By: Elke van der Werff, Administrative & Communications Coordinator City of Falcon Heights 2077 Larpenteur Ave West Falcon Heights, MN 55113 elke.vanderwerff@falconheights.org 651-792-7621 74 Request for Proposal TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION SECTION 2: PROCESS SECTION 3: SCOPE OF SERVICES SECTION 4: PROPOSAL FORM AND CONTENT SECTION 5: EVALUATION CRITERIA 75 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION The City of Falcon Heights is seeking proposals from vendors who are interested in providing cost-effective and quality services for the City’s 2024 Printing Services. The City of Falcon Heights may extend the contract based on the vendor’s performance and the need of the City. The print vendor must be located in close proximity to City Hall to provide timely printing services. Proposals must include all items specified in this document. All proposals must be submitted to the City’s Administrative & Communications Coordinator Elke van der Werff at elke.vanderwerff@falconheights.org no later than 4:30PM on Wednesday, December 6th 2023. SECTION 2 PROCESS Notice is hereby given that proposals will be received by the City of Falcon Heights, Ramsey County, Minnesota for printing services. The City of Falcon Heights (the City) invites qualified individuals or firms to submit proposals to provide newsletter/postcard printing services based upon the scope of work contained herein. Information regarding the RFP process, if not found within this document, may be obtained from Elke van der Werff, Administrative & Communications Coordinator, by email at elke.vanderwerff@falconheights.org or by phone at 651-792-7621. Find additional information about the City of Falcon Heights at www.falconheights.org 2-1 Requests for Proposal The City of Falcon Heights invites qualified individuals or firms to submit proposals for newsletter/postcard printing as described in the scope of work set forth in Section 3 of this Request for Proposals (RFP). 2-2 Schedule (tentative) Issue Date: November 16, 2023 Closing Date: December 06, 2023 Anticipated Award Notice: December 08, 2023 Anticipated Contract Approval: December 13, 2023 Service to Begin: December 14, 2023 2-3 Official Contact Questions regarding the scope of services shall be directed to: Elke van der Werff, Administrative & Communications Coordinator City of Falcon Heights 2077 Larpenteur Ave West Falcon Heights, MN 55113 elke.vanderwerff@falconheights.org 76 651-792-7621 2-4 Proposal Due Date: Three (3) copies of the proposal must be delivered to Elke van der Werff, 2077 Larpenteur Avenue West, Falcon Heights, MN 55113, no later than 4:30PM on Wednesday, December 6th 2023. A digital proposal may also be emailed by this deadline to elke.vanderwerff@falconheights.org but samples should be mailed or delivered. Proposals should be marked “RFP Newsletter/Postcard Printing Services”. Late proposals will be kept by the City, but not considered for award. Proposals must be sealed and clearly addressed and marked with the RFP title. 2-5 Cancellation, Delay or Suspension of Solicitation: Rejection of Proposals The City may cancel, delay or suspend this solicitation if in the best interest of the City as determined by the City. The City may reject any or all proposals, in whole or in part, if in the best interest of the City as determined by the City. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals not in compliance with public bidding procedures. 2-6 Incurred Costs The City is not liable for any costs incurred by a proposer in the preparation and/or presentation of a proposal. The City is not liable for any cost incurred by a proposer in protesting the City’s selection decision. SECTION 3 SCOPE OF SERVICES The City of Falcon Heights welcomes proposals from individual printing companies or individuals in response to specific work products identified below. 3-2 Scope of Work and Deliverables The principal responsibility of the selected printer is a part of a periodic assessment of the cost-effectiveness and quality of Falcon Heights printed material, and the city is requesting proposals for various printing needs. City of Falcon Heights Bi-annual Newsletter: Bid Option 1 – Half-Page Newsletter • Folded size 8.5” x 11” saddle stitched • Full color • A full color proof will be provided to the city for review before the publication is approved for print. Please include the fee for revisions to the final proof. • 4,116 mailing by simplified carrier routes – Every Door Direct Mailing 77 • 100 copies boxed and delivered to City Hall City of Falcon Heights Bi-annual Newsletter: Bid Option 2 – Full Size Newsletter • Folded size 11” x 17” saddle stitched • Full color • A full color proof will be provided to the city for review before the publication is approved for print. Please include the fee for revisions to the final proof. • 4,116 mailing by simplified carrier routes – Every Door Direct Mailing • 100 copies boxed and delivered to City Hall A specific brand of paper is not specified in this RFP, however a high quality, 100% post- consumer recycled content paper is required. Mailing: The City of Falcon Heights Bi-annual Newsletter is mailed, via carrier route, to all Falcon Heights households and businesses. The printer is responsible for mailing preparation and delivery to the post office. The City will provide payment for postage, payable to the printer as part of the printing invoice. Postage cost should be at the presort standard rate. Schedule: The City of Falcon Heights Bi-annual Newsletter will be printed and mailed two times during the year on the following schedule. • January/February – Printed late January or early February for delivery late February • July/August – Printed late July or early August, for delivery before the start of the Minnesota State Fair The printer will have all of the materials delivered to the United States Postal Service within seven business days of receiving approval of the proof from the City. City of Falcon Heights Postcards • 6.25 x 9 postcard size • Full color • 4,116 mailing by simplified carrier routes • 100 copies boxed and delivered to City Hall Mailing: The City of Falcon Heights postcards are mailed, via carrier route, to all Falcon Heights households and businesses. The printer is responsible for mailing preparation and delivery to the post office. The City will provide payment for postage, payable to the printer as part of the printing invoice. Postage cost should be at the presort standard rate. 78 Schedule: The City of Falcon Heights postcards can be printed up to four times during 2024. The City of Falcon Heights will notify the printer a week in advance to prepare for printing. The printer will have all of the materials delivered to the United States Postal Service within seven business days of receiving approval of the proof from the City. SECTION 4 PROPOSAL FORM AND CONTENT 4-1 Proposal Submittal Proposals shall be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward, concise description of the proposer’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements of the RFP. Emphasis should be on completeness and clarity of content and cost effectiveness of the proposal. 4-2 Proposal Form and Content Proposals should include the following items in their proposals addressing the scope of work in Section 3. Proposal and cost schedule shall be valid and binding for ninety (90) days following the proposal due date and will become part of the contract that is negotiated with the City. The following will be considered minimum contents of the proposal and must be submitted in the order listed: 1. Proposed Printer’s Qualifications Summarize your or the firm’s background and history; include the depth and breadth of your firm’s experience in printing newsletters and any experience you may have working on related projects. 2. Scope of Services Offered Provide a detailed breakdown of how you would approach the Scope of Work proposed in Section 3. Include specific information on the steps that would be taken to address each of the primary areas of need. 3. Samples Proposals shall include a minimum of two (2) samples demonstrate a community newsletter that uses the same or similar specifications to the bid. 4. Fee Schedule 79 The printer must submit a compensation schedule for the services outlined in the preliminary scope of work. The compensation schedule submitted shall be guaranteed by the printer for the term of the contract. 5. Additional Information Any information that the proposer feels is applicable to the evaluation of the Proposal or of their qualifications for accomplishing this request for services should be included in this section. You may use this section to address the aspects of your services that distinguish you or your firm from other firms. SECTION 5 EVALUATION CRITERIA The City shall evaluate the proposal on criteria including, but not limited to, the following list (in no order of priority). 1. The printer adheres to the instruction in this Request for Proposals on preparing and submitting the proposal; 2. The proposed turnaround time from receipt of a draft newsletter to delivery to the post office; 3. Compensation schedule; 4. Printing samples. 80 BLANK PAGE  81 Item Support for Participation in Compass Peer Group Description I’ve been invited to participate in a new cohort of other city administrators in the Twin Cities that focuses on leadership development starting in January 2024. The cohort will be made up of 8-12 city administrators of various experience levels, and is led by Edina City Manager Scott Neal. Consultant and former City Manager Craig Rapp is the founder/facilitator of the groups. Compass Peer Groups has operated in Minnesota since December 2011. During that time, 100 City Managers & Assistants have been members. Currently, there are 43 Managers and 20 Assistants across six groups. They provide a safe, supportive environment to share, learn and grow. The Basics: • Groups meet for 3 hours once a month--ten sessions. No meeting in July, optional retreat in December. Minimum group size: 8; maximum group size: 12. • 1/2 of the session is devoted to peer support, 1/2 to a curated leadership and personal development topics. Content satisfies ICMA Credentialing credits. • Cost: $1,600/year. Past Falcon Heights city administrators have participated in the group, and our leadership/training budget currently reflects the cost of participation. Due to the cost and time commitment required, I’m seeking formal support from the City Council to participate. Budget Impact $1,600 per year. There are funds available in our leadership and training line-items to cover this cost. Attachment(s) • Compass Peer Group Brochure Action(s) Requested Request for the City Council to formally support City Administrator Jack Linehan’s participation in the Compass Peer Group. Meeting Date November 15, 2023 Agenda Item Consent G11 Attachment Brochure Submitted By Jack Linehan, City Administrator 82 83 Peer support & leadership development for local government executives 84 When was the last time you admitted you were overwhelmed? 85 When was the last time you claimed your brilliance? 86 When was the last time you shared a personal problem? With your peers? 87 It’s lonely at the top… 88 Where do you go for answers? 89 90 How, and where, do you learn? 91 There’s power in sharing… …with people who’ve walked in your shoes 92 Forum Framework Facilitation 93 PEER SUPPORT LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PERSONAL ASSESSMENTS COACHING 94 Comprehensive Content Leadership and Governance Candid Communications Strategy and Implementation Customers & Civic Engagement Performance Measurement Operations Work Systems Workforce- Engagement & Development Achieving and Reporting Results Change Management 95 •KNOW YOURSELF •Self Awareness •KNOW YOUR ENVIRONMENT •Situational Awareness •KNOW HOW TO ACT/REACT •Emotional Awareness 96 Deep Dives AWARE CLEAR SELF Session 1 Self-awareness assessment Problems of not seeing yourself Developing greater self-awareness Session 2 Being more open, sharing more What are Emotions? Balanced emotions Relishing feedback, learning from it OTHER Session 3 Relationship-awareness assessment Problems of not seeing others Finding strengths in others Session 4 Active Constructive Responding Listening skills; Developing empathy Building strong relationships TEAM Session 5 Team -awareness assessment Problems of not seeing teams Trust Session 6 Skills for strong teams Dealing with conflict Commitments, Accountability, Results ORGANIZATION Session 7 Organizational -awareness assessment Problems of not seeing your organization Culture and structure Session 8 Vision, mission, values alignment Leadership Spans of Control GENERAL Session 9 Retreat All peer groups Session 10 Year-end reflections Lessons Learned 97 Find out what corporate executives already know… Vistage The Board Forum Entrepreneur’s Organization Young President’s Organization CEO Roundtable CEO Think Tank Founder Institute True North Groups Institute 98 Join Your Colleagues! 99 www.compasspeergroup.com 100 BLANK PAGE  101 Item Amber Flats – Planned Unit Development Proposal Description Amber Flats is a proposed 100-unit affordable housing apartment building to be located directly to the west of the existing Amber Union Apartments. The purpose of this application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) is to allow for the construction of this apartment building along with flexibility in City Code guidelines. THE PROPOSAL Buhl Larpenteur West LLC is the owner and developer of Amber Union Apartments. The new apartment building will be situated in the existing overflow parking lot next to Amber Union. Amber Flats will be an affordable housing apartment building with 100-units, consisting of 60 1-bedroom units and 40 2-bedroom units. Parking for residents will be provided in 51 surface parking stalls and 63 sublevel stalls for a total of 114 parking spaces. Why a PUD? A PUD is intended to permit flexibility of site design, the conservation of land and open space through clustering of buildings and activities, and an incentive to developers to plan creatively by providing density bonuses. This can be achieved by allowing deviations from standards including setbacks, heights and similar regulations. Additionally, a PUD is required for all developments having two or more principal uses or structures on a single parcel of land. This project will only have one building on the parcel of land, so it would not necessarily need to be a PUD. However, there are several deviations from City Code in regard to height, impervious surface, and parking requirements that would call for either a variance or PUD. As this is a larger development and there would be more than one variance necessary, a PUD would be the best option to allow for the flexibility being called for. Current Status of Property & City Code Requirements Below are excepts from City Code with the standard requirements for new developments in the zoning district this property is currently located in. Meeting Date November 15, 2023 Agenda Item Policy Item H-1 Attachment See below. Submitted By Hannah Lynch, Community Development Coordinator 102 Bolded next to each item is how the proposal does or does not currently meet those requirements and any additional staff notes. This property is currently zoned R5M, High Density Residential Mixed Use. Sec. 118-182 (b) Purpose and intent. The purpose of the mixed use high density residential district is to provide high density, primarily apartment style, rental and condominium housing with limited commercial uses within the same structure. The intent of the district is to meet or exceed the city’s comprehensive plan density goal of 28 residential units per acre. Proposal meets this intent. Sec. 118-182 (c) Permitted uses. (1) Apartment buildings with a maximum of 40 dwelling units per acre. Proposal meets this requirement @ 39 dwelling units per acre. Sec. 118-182 (g) Lot area, height, lot width, and yard requirements. (1) The following minimum requirements shall be observed subject to additional requirements except as modified in this section and in section 113-241: Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard 2.5 acres N/A – Not a new lot. 200 feet N/A – Not a new lot. 30 feet Proposal meets this requirement @ >45’. 10 feet or ½ the height of the building, whichever is greater Proposal meets this requirement @ >25’. 30 feet Proposal meets this requirement @ >50’. (2) The required setback from a lot line abutting property zoned R-1 is 50 feet. Proposal meets this requirement @ 162’ & >128’. (4) Except as provided in section 113-243, the maximum height is four stories or 40 feet, whichever is less. Proposal does not meet this requirement, but is only about 3’ off. For reference, Falcon Heights Town Square is around 49’ in height at its tallest point, and the existing Amber Union building is over 52’ in height at its tallest point. This building would be stepping down from that. Sec. 113-241 – Required yards and open spaces (b) Permitted encroachments on required yards. The following shall be permitted encroachments into setback and height requirements except as restricted by other sections of this chapter: (4) In no event shall off-street parking, structures of any type, buildings, or any impervious surfaces cover more than 75 percent of the lot area. The existing lot is a total of 2.72 acres. Existing impervious surface on lot is 2.30 acres which is around 85% impervious. The proposed impervious surface is 2.07 acres 103 which is around 76% impervious. While this is still higher than City Code, it is a net decrease in impervious surface of .23 acres. DIVISION 2. – OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING Sec. 113-310 – Residential districts (3) The following provisions apply to the R-5M district: The requirements of the R- 4 district shall apply except that at least 80 percent of the required parking spaces for apartment buildings shall be below grade and integrated into the apartment building. (2) The following provisions shall apply to the R-3 and R-4 districts: (e) Off-street parking spaces required (one space equals 350 square feet) shall be as follows for: Multiple-family dwellings. At least two parking spaces per dwelling unit. By code, this property would require 200 parking spaces, with 80% of those being below grade (160 spaces). As proposed, there are to be 51 surface parking spaces and 63 sublevel parking spaces for a total of 114 parking spaces. This equals to 1.14 parking stalls per unit. This does not meet City Code, however the project does provide access to the Route 61 Line and Metro A Line bus stations. In addition, when comparing this to the Amber Union Apartment project which only provided 1.08 parking stalls per unit, this project does allow for slightly more parking. Reports from Amber Union property management state that approximately 80% of the current allotted spaces are used despite full occupancy. THE PUD / CITY CODE AMENDMENT PROCESS Notice Required Planned unit developments may be permitted in the legislative discretion of the city council. The application and hearing process for a planned unit development is the same as is required for other zoning chapter amendments. The standard notice requirement for amendments to a zoning district boundary is mailing a notice to all property owners within 350’ of the property. As a best practice however, the City mails to all property owners and residents within 500’. The notice was also posted at City Hall and published in the Pioneer Press on October 14 and October 16, 2023. Comprehensive Plan Consistency A PUD must be consistent with the city comprehensive plan and the intent and purpose of the City Code provisions relative to land use, subdivision and development. Several relevant goals have been provided below for reference, however a full copy of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan can be found online: 104 https://www.falconheights.org/government/departments/community- development-planning-and-zoning/comprehensive-plan From Falcon Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan: Housing Goals: 3. Keep housing affordable, maintenance affordable, and accessible to all income levels. General Land Use Goals 8. Encourage vertical development by minimizing impervious surfacing and maximizing space. Larpenteur Corridor Policies 3. Allow flexibility in development standards on Larpenteur to recognize the challenge of redeveloping small properties on a scale similar to surrounding residential development. Neighborhood Goals 5. To encourage the availability of a diverse housing stock. 6. To provide opportunities for affordable housing in proximity to public transportation, commercial services and recreational facilities. 11. On transit routes, allow the replacement of existing medium-density multi-family structures at equal or high density, incorporating best practices for conserving green space and promoting active living. Commercial/Business Goals 3. To ensure access and safety for pedestrians and those using non- motorized transportation. 6. To provide convenience parking in sufficient amounts to meet parking demand. NOTES AND ANALYSIS FROM STAFF Planning Staff – Overall, this plan does a good job of mostly conforming to City Code requirements. Were it not for the height, impervious surface, and parking details, this project could have been issued a permit administratively and would not have required any public hearing or discussion by the Planning Commission. As it stands, the deviations from City Code are not overly concerning. The height, while not meeting Code, will still be less than the building next to it (Amber Union) and across Snelling (Falcon Heights Town Square). While the impervious surface is just over Code requirements, it is still bringing that impervious surface amount down from its existing use as a parking lot. Finally, the parking is off from City Code by 86 spaces, however as this property is proposed to be affordable housing and is located by public transit, the additional spaces may not be necessary. Amber Union currently has a parking ratio of 1.08 parking stalls per unit, and was approved by both the Planning Commission and City Council with this amount. This apartment building will have 105 more than that at 1.14 parking stalls per unit, and will include sublevel parking. In addition, requiring more parking to bring it up to 2 parking stall per unit would most likely increase the impervious surface on the site, further increasing the nonconformity of that feature of City Code and increasing the harmful effects of impervious surface to the environment. Ramsey County – Comments Attached Engineering – Comments Attached Fire Marshal – Comments Attached Future Steps After recommendation from the Planning Commission, City Council may act upon the proposed amendment. Pursuant to Minn. Stats. §15.99, the amendment must be approved or denied within 60 days from the date a properly completed application is received by the city. Recommendation from Planning Commission The Planning Commission met on October 24, 2023 and held a public hearing. Minutes from that hearing have been attached. After hearing comments and discussion, the Planning Commission voted 6-1 to recommend approval of the PUD. Minutes from that meeting have been attached. The Planning Commission recommends the following conditions be placed upon the PUD: (a) All surface parking shall be offered at no charge to residents. This has been removed from the recommendation drafted for City Council after consultation with the City Attorney. (b) Trees shall be planted and/or maintained along Larpenteur Avenue and Underwood Street as shown in plans submitted by UrbanWorks, dated 10/16/2023. (c) Snow storage may not be stored in any parking area for more than 48 hours. (d) Open space as shown on plans submitted by UrbanWorks, dated, 10/16/2023, may not be converted into additional parking. (e) Charging stations for not less than four electric vehicles must be provided on site. Number of charging stations was not decided by the Planning Commission. After speaking with developer, they are intending to have at least four charging stations. (f) Developer shall comply with all recommendations from Ramsey County, City Engineer, and Fire Marshal. Budget Impact None. 106 Attachment(s) - Application for PUD - Narrative from applicant - Proposed plans from applicant - Posted Notice - Newspaper Notice - Newspaper Notice Affidavit - Notice to Property Owners / Residents - Section 113-35 from Falcon Heights City Code – Amendments to Zoning Code - Notes from Ramsey County - Notes from City Engineer - Notes from Fire Marshal - DRAFT Minutes from October 24, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT City Council Findings and Decision - DRAFT Amber Flats PUD Ordinance - DRAFT Amber Flats PUD Summary Ordinance Action(s) Requested The Planning Commission of Falcon Heights recommends approval of the Amber Flats PUD along with conditions as stated within drafted ordinance. 107 108 (2) a. The planned unit development will be established as a safe, clean and well-designed living environment. Careful thought and consideration have been put into the layout of the building footprint to minimize impacts to surrounding neighbors, particularly Hollywood Court which is adjacent to the property. The building is proposed to be placed as far west as possible on the site without violating code required setbacks and maintains the large vegetative buffer on the southeast of the site to allow for mitigated impact on the surrounding neighborhood. The building is designed to be efficiently built while sustaining a high-quality aesthetic. It is the project team’s goal to create LIHTC housing that is all but indiscernible from market rate housing which is achieved through larger windows and higher quality unit finishes than what is typical, along with thoughtful design practices. The aesthetic design of the building was inspired by the Amber Union project in certain design aspects including material colors, chamfered corners and other Art Deco inspired characteristics. The proposed planned unit development notably maintains the existing parking easement stalls which were previously and currently provided to the Amber Union Apartments project. Parking for the project will be mostly provided through the construction of an underground parking structure within the footprint of the building, with the addition of a number of surface stalls. The PUD includes new green space and sidewalks on the property, allowing for greater connectivity for the new residences to surrounding retail businesses located on the Larpenteur Snelling corridor, along with access to the Purple Line and Metro A Line bus stations located on the corner of Larpenteur and Snelling which are approximately 700 feet or approximately 1/8 of a mile away. The three major parks in Falcon Heights are also interconnected by trails and roads stemming from Larpenteur Ave. Surrounding land uses along the south side of Larpenteur include single-family homes, the existing 125-unit Amber Union Apartment building and other housing projects including Larpenteur Manor Apartments and the Hendrickson. In addition to the new housing use being directly adjacent to other residential uses to the east, west and south, the project would increase density along the Larpenteur-Snelling Corridor and deliver affordable housing along a transit line which are identified goals in the Falcon Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The project would also provide new patrons for the retail and local businesses located across the street to the north of Larpenteur. (2) b. The final ownership of the planned unit development will consist of an ownership structure typical of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) project including a project LIHTC investor partnership. The final ownership structure includes Buhl Larpenteur West, LLC as General Partner and Sponsor, who is ultimately responsible for managing the project and asset. Buhl Larpenteur West, LLC and its property management agents would be responsible for maintaining the newly built housing structure including janitorial cleaning, removing refuse and recycling, pest control and other typical interior maintenance items to ensure a clean and safe environment for our tenants. Exterior maintenance items would include window washing, parking lot sweeping, general site trash pickup, landscaping maintenance of grass and planted areas, snow and ice removal along sidewalks on Larpenteur Ave W and along sidewalks and paved areas on the project site. On-site play equipment will also be cleaned and maintained by the property management team. On-site maintenance will be consistent with typical expectations for an apartment building. (2) c. The planned unit development is anticipated to have a total of 100 units with 60 1-bedroom units and 40 2-bedroom units. The planned unit development is anticipated to have a total of 140 beds. 109 CONTACTS NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE: EMAIL: 612-590-1643 pete@buhlinvestors.com harry@buhlinvestors.com 5100 EDEN AVE, SUITE 317 EDINA, MN 55436 BUHL INVESTORS PETE DEANOVIC HARRY MOHAGEN OWNER / DEVELOPER NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE: EMAIL: 612-455-3100 dmiller@urban-works.com mbarnett@urban-works.com 901 N 3RD ST, SUITE 145 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC DAVID MILLER MARY BARNETT ARCHITECT NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE: EMAIL: 952-908-2664 mike@frana.com 633 2ND AVE S HOPKINS, MN 55343 FRANA COMPANIES MIKE BENEDICT GENERAL CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE: EMAIL: 763-843-0474 jtimm@bkbm.com 6120 EARLE BROWN DR, SUITE 700 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55430 BKBM ENGINEERS JOHN TIMM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE: EMAIL: 763-251-1011 dan.elenbaas@kimley-horn.com ryan.calrson@kimley-horn.com 767 EUSTIS ST, SUITE 100 SAINT PAUL, MN 55114 KIMLEY-HORN DAN ELENBAAS RYAN CARLSON CIVIL ENGINEER NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE: EMAIL: 763-257-7928 jsymynkywicz@damonfarber.com 310 4TH AVE, SUITE 7050 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 DAMON FARBER JESSE SYMYNKYWICZ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE: EMAIL: 612-279-4203 rstephans@ctamep.com 3433 BROADWAY ST NE, SUITE 475 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 CAIN THOMAS ASSOCIATES RYAN STEPHANS MEP ENGINEER GENERAL NOTES 1.DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 2.SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE AND SHALL REVIEW THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS AND INTENT OF THE SCOPE OF THE WORK PRIOR COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO GENERAL CONTRACTOR FOR CLARIFICATION. N NAME # # # AXXX # AXXX 4 1 AXXX 3 # AXXX - - - - SYMBOL INDEX SECTION NUMBER SECTION CUT CUT LINE ELEVATION CALLOUT SHEET NUMBER CUT LINE DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER SECTION DETAIL CALLOUT DETAIL NUMBER PRIMARY SHEET NUMBER DETAIL CALLOUT AREA DETAIL CALLOUT SECONDARY REVISION CLOUD (top of parapet, sill, etc.) DOOR TAG NORTH ARROW KEYNOTE TAG ROOM TAG INTERIOR TAGS WINDOW TAG # MATERIAL TAG WDW KEY xxx xxx JOINT LINE FLOOR TRANSITION TAG FLOOR MAT x' - x"CRPADCARD READER DOOR OPERATOR INTERIOR FIXTURE TAGXX1 XX1 INTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL TAG ELEVATION NUMBER SHEET NUMBER SPOT ELEVATION REVISION TAG REVISION CLOUD POLAR INDICATOR DOOR NUMBER WINDOW TYPE KEYNOTE NUMBER MATERIAL DESIGNATION ACCESS CONTROL SYMBOLS HEIGHT ABOVE AFF ROOM NUMBER ROOM NAME ROOM AREA# KEY © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2023901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PUD APPLICATION 10.16.2023 10/16/2023 3:54:49 PMC:\!Revit Project Files\23-0013 A22 Central_lfrazierNZVSX.rvtLARPENTEUR AVE W / FALCON HEIGHTS, MN 5511310/16/2024 23-0013 SITE PLAN LF MEB TITLE SHEET G001BUHL - FALCON HEIGHTS AMBER FLATS PUD APPLICATION PARKING STALLS AREA SUMMARY UNIT COUNT VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX 10.16.2023 SITE CITY, ST SUBLEVEL SURFACE TOTAL PARKING ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 2 4 COMPACT PARKING STALL 0 0 0 STANDARD PARKING STALL 61 49 110 GRAND TOTAL 63 51 114 GROSS BUILDING AREA GROSS AREA SUBLEVEL 1 24,404 SF LEVEL 1 23,291 SF LEVEL 2 23,467 SF LEVEL 3 23,467 SF LEVEL 4 23,467 SF GRAND TOTAL 118,094 SF UNIT TYPE SCHEDULE NLSF LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 TOTAL 1BR 32,224 SF 12 16 16 16 2BR 35,465 SF 7 11 11 11 GRAND TOTAL 67,689 SF 19 27 27 27 G001 TITLE SHEET SURVEY ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY SURVEY. ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY C000 COVER SHEET C100 GENERAL NOTES C200 SITE DEMOLITION PLAN C300 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN C302 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS C400 SITE DIMENSION PLAN C401 SITE DETAILS C500 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C501 GRADING DETAILS C600 UTILITY PLAN C601 UTILITY DETAILS AL101 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A001.0 SUBLEVEL 1 - OVERALL PLAN A101.0 LEVEL 1 PLAN - OVERALL A102.0 LEVEL 2 PLAN - OVERALL A301 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A351 BUILDING AXONOMETRIC VIEW A352 BUILDING AXONOMETRIC VIEWSUBLEVEL ACCESSIBLE PARKING 2% REQUIRED 63 * .02 = 1.26 STALLS REQUIRED 2 PROVIDED SURFACE ACCESSIBLE PARKING 2% REQUIRED 51 * .02 = 1.02 STALLS REQUIRED 2 PROVIDED 60 40 100 110 111 112 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\UrbanWorks\Falcon Heights Affordable\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C0-COVER SHEET.dwg October 16, 2023 - 2:40pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORCOVER SHEETC000FALCON HEIGHTSAFFORDABLE HOUSINGBUHLFALCON HEIGHTSMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.DAN ELENBAAS, P.E.XX/XX/XXXXX44614DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16084401210/16/2023AS SHOWNPGSPGSDLENORTH VICINITY N.T.S. SITE FALCON HEIGHTS, RAMSEY COUNTY, MN 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A ANSI full bleed D (34.00 x 22.00 Inches) SHEET. 3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. NOTES: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DF/DAMON FARBER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN 310 S 4TH AVE, SUITE 7050, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 CONTACT: JESSE SYMYNKYWICZ, ASLA, PLA PRINCIPAL CELL: 763.257.7928 OFFICE: 612.332.7522 DAMONFARBER.COM PROJECT TEAM: ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED BY: DAN ELENBAAS, P.E. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 OWNER / DEVELOPER BUHL 5100 EDEN AVENUE, SUITE 317, EDINA MN, 55346 TELEPHONE: 612.968.3728 CONTACT: PETER DEANOVIC FALCON HEIGHTS AFFORDABLE HOUSING S21, T29N, R23W FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call ARCHITECT URBAN WORKS ARCHITECTURE, LLC 501 N THIRD ST, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 CONTACT: MARY BARNETT DIRECT: 612.455.3120 MOBILE: 763.458.5563 SITE BENCHMARKS: (LOCATIONS SHOWN ON SURVEY) SBM #1 TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT NEAR THE NE CORNER OF NEIGHBORING SITE AT INTERSECTION OF LARPENTEUR AVE AND SNELLING AVE. ELEVATION=959.18 (NGVD 29) BENCHMARKS LARPENTEUR AVE W SNELLING AVEUNDERWOOD STSheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title C000 COVER SHEET C100 GENERAL NOTES C200 SITE DEMOLITION PLAN C300 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN C301 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS C400 SITE DIMENSION PLAN C401 SITE DETAILS C500 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C501 GRADING DETAILS C600 UTILITY PLAN C601 UTILITY DETAILS 113 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\UrbanWorks\Falcon Heights Affordable\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C1-GENERAL NOTES.dwg October 16, 2023 - 2:40pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORGENERAL NOTESC100FALCON HEIGHTSAFFORDABLE HOUSINGBUHLFALCON HEIGHTSMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.DAN ELENBAAS, P.E.XX/XX/XXXXX44614DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16084401210/16/2023AS SHOWNPGSPGSDLEGENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE MN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION *STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION* (LATEST EDITION) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK, EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. 4. THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL "D" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ACSE 38/02, ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATA BY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK. 5. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. 8. ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER. 9. ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THE OWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILT INFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. ALL AS-BUILT DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES ARE ENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 11. ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELL DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED. 12. ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY OBLIGATION TO PAY FOR A RELATED CHANGE ORDER. 14. SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE DOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATION, ASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION, INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALK INSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE OF MN NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SHALL MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LOG AND RECORD ANY ADJUSTMENTS AND DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS WITHIN THE SWPPP DOCUMENTS STORED IN THE JOB SITE TRAILER. BMPS SHOWN ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALL JURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIED PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A 0.5-INCH OR GREATER RAINFALL EVENT. 6. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: 6.1. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING OR DETERIORATION. 6.2. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO VERIFY THAT A HEALTHY STAND OF VEGETATION IS MAINTAINED. SEEDED AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RE-SEEDED AS NEEDED. REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 6.3. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. 6.4. THE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC ADDITIONS OF ROCK TOP DRESSING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 6.5. THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC ADDITIONS OF TOP DRESSING IF THE TEMPORARY PARKING CONDITIONS DEMAND. 6.6. PERFORM ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 2 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION. PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES 1. ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE LOCAL CITY OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS, OR MN DOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS IF NOT COVERED BY LOCAL CITY OR COUNTY REGULATIONS. 2. ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D) AND CITY STANDARDS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES, PARKING STALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS, AND MISCELLANEOUS STRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 4. ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB. 5. THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET. 6. ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINT SEALANT. 7. THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN THE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 9. ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 10. BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PER A.D.A). GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 11. MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET. GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST BMP'S AS NECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS SO THAT SURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY GRADING DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR UTILITIES. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS, POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES. 5. BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT THE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE PARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLY INSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED. 6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 4" OF TOPSOIL AT COMPLETION OF WORK. ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REGRADED AND SODDED. 7. AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST AND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL ADEQUATELY DRAIN TOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED. 8. WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT FULL DEPTH FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAME TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS. 10. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED PERMITS. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 11. FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY OR TO MN DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 12. ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THE AREAS SHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED TO MINIMUM COVERAGE OF 70% IN ALL AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND SCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 14. SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 48 HOURS OF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT EROSION, SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTING AREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND MN DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 17. PAVEMENTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE SITE SPECIFIC GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT, CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS AND MN DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 18. SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED SURFACE GRADE OR FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 19. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. 20. IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 21. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT COMPENSATION. 22. BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE. 23. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLANKET. 24. ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 25. ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE. 26. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE MINIMUM GRADES ARE MET WITHIN PAVED AREAS, 1.2% FOR ASPHALT PAVING AND 0.6% FOR CONCRETE PAVING. WATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES, AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 2. ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 4. DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. 5. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I. PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED. ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6. WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE. 7. ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE COMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 8. UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO BACK FILLING. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY . 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 10-FEET AND A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18-INCHES BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER MANHOLES AND PIPES, 11. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 12. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 13. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING & COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER". EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE. 14. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 15. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 16. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT. 17. ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORM STRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 2.0% SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN. 18. PROVIDE INSULATION OF UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICES IF 7 FEET OF COVER CANNOT BE PROVIDED. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 20. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE AND BELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 21. A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 5-FEET IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER IS UTILIZED. 22. GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITY COMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 23. COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. 24. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH AND SPECIFICATIONS. 25. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS. 26. REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 27. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS. 28. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS FOR ROUTING OF PROPOSED ELECTRICAL & COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES AND SITE LIGHTING LAYOUT. THIRD PARTY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THIRD PARTY CONSULTANTS. TEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: ·DENSITY TEST REPORTS ·BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM ·PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER ·LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS ·ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITY 114 EXISTING UTILITY BUILDING TO BE REMOVED EXISTING 36" STORM LINE TO BE REMOVED AND REROUTED EXISTING UNDERGROUND STORM TANK TO BE REMOVED A A A A A B B B B B B B B B B C D D D E E E EE E E E F F F G G G H H H H H H I I I I EXISTING PORTION OF STORM SEWER EASEMENT TO BE ABANDONED AND RELOCATED EXISTING HIGHWAY EASEMENT TO BE ABANDONED J G This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\UrbanWorks\Falcon Heights Affordable\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C2-DEMO PLAN.dwg October 16, 2023 - 2:41pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORSITE DEMOLITIONPLANC200FALCON HEIGHTSAFFORDABLE HOUSINGBUHLFALCON HEIGHTSMNDATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16084401210/16/2023AS SHOWNPGSPGSDLENORTH LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE BUILDING REMOVE TREE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES PROPERTY LINE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE EXISTING J-BARRIER EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SIGN EXISTING FLARED END SECTION EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE EXISTING WELL EXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER EXISTING ROOF DRAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING METAL COVER EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE EXISTING CABLE BOX EXISTING GUY WIRE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE CLEARING & GRUBBING FILL & ABANDON UTILITY LINES EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER LEGEND FULL DEPTH SAWCUT Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE BUILDING REMOVE TREE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES PROPERTY LINE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE EXISTING J-BARRIER EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SIGN EXISTING FLARED END SECTION EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE EXISTING WELL EXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER EXISTING ROOF DRAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING METAL COVER EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE EXISTING CABLE BOX EXISTING GUY WIRE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE CLEARING & GRUBBING FILL & ABANDON UTILITY LINES EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER LEGEND FULL DEPTH SAWCUT 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) OF ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING OF THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY REQUIRED PERMITS FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL FROM THE APPROPRIATE LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE, INCLUDING THE TYPE OF DEBRIS AND LOCATION WHERE IT WAS DISPOSED. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 5. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES TO PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN PROPOSED WORK AREA. 6. EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON AVAILABLE RECORD PLAN DATA AND/OR FIELD UTILITY MARKINGS AND ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION. ADDITIONAL UNMARKED OBSTACLES MAY EXIST ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED UNDERGROUND FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING REMOVAL OF SERVICE LINES AND CAP ANY ABANDONED LINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE PROPOSED WORK. 7. ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC. (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY, RAMSEY COUNTY, AND MINNESOTA DOT AS NECESSARY. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10. PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION, INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS / SWPPP. 11. CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT OR CURB, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE CITY WATER AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED. 13. IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE REQUIREMENTS. 14. IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE; ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL NOT BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. 16. IF CONTAMINATED MATERIAL IS ENCOUNTERED ON THE PROJECT SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STOP WORK AND NOTIFY THE OWNER AND ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES KEYNOTE LEGEND SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT REMOVE EXISTING CURB REMOVE EXISTING SIDEWALK REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT REMOVE EXISTING TREE REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRICAL LINE / EQUIPMENT REMOVE EXISTING STORM LINE REMOVE EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE REMOVE EXISTING FIBER OPTIC A B C D E F G H I J DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.DAN ELENBAAS, P.E.XX/XX/XXXXX44614115 PROP. BUILDING FFE = 957.25 BFE = 947.25 AVE GRADE = 956.14 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE INLET PROTECTION (TYP.) SILT FENCE (BEHIND CURB)956955954 952953954953 952 951 950 950 951 952 952 951 95 0954955 956 956955 955956955956 957 955955948949950951952953957 956955953952953952 952953956950 955 951952 953954 956957955953954956957 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\UrbanWorks\Falcon Heights Affordable\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C3-EROS PH1 PLAN.dwg October 16, 2023 - 2:42pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTH 1. INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL (I.E. SILT FENCE) AND INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER INLETS. 2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND CONCRETE WASHOUT. 3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 4. CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS. 5. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE. 6. BEGIN MASS SITE GRADING AND ROUGH GRADE SITE SUFFICIENTLY TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. 7. START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. 8. TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE OR AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES AND/OR CITY GRADING PERMIT(S). 9. TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DENUDED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE. 10. CONSTRUCT UNDERGROUND SITE UTILITIES AND STORM SEWER, INCLUDING UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. 11. INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION AT ANY NEW STORM SEWER STRUCTURES AS EACH STRUCTURE IS CONSTRUCTED. 12. COMPLETE SITE GRADING AND PERMANENTLY STABILIZE AREAS TO BE VEGETATED AS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE. 13. PLACE PAVEMENT BASE MATERIAL AND INSTALL SUBDRAINAGE SYSTEM. 14. CONSTRUCT PAVEMENTS, CURB & GUTTER, AND SIDEWALKS. 15. AS APPROPRIATE, REPLACE & MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WITHIN PAVED AREAS AS WORK PROGRESSES. 16. COMPLETE FINAL GRADING AND INSTALL OF PERMANENT STABILIZATION (SEEDING, SODDING, ETC.) WITHIN LANDSCAPED AREAS. 17. WHEN THE SITE HAS ACHIEVED FINAL STABILIZATION AS DEFINED BY THE APPLICABLE EROSION CONTROL PERMITS, REMOVE ALL REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND RE-STABILIZE ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL NOTE: THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION IS INTENDED TO CONVEY THE GENERAL CONCEPTS OF THE EROSION CONTROL DESIGN AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETAILED PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY, PRIOR TO AND/OR DURING CONSTRUCTION IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE IS NECESSARY. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION ROCK ENTRANCE INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SAFETY FENCE BIOROLL LEGEND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call PREPARED FOREROSION ANDSEDIMENTCONTROL PLANC300FALCON HEIGHTSAFFORDABLE HOUSINGBUHLFALCON HEIGHTSMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.DAN ELENBAAS, P.E.XX/XX/XXXXX44614DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16084401210/16/2023########PGSPGSDLE1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT, AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY, ENGINEER OR OWNER. 4. SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE MUST BE REMOVED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ANY FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR. 5. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE LAND DISTURBANCE AND CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON THE PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 8. ALL WASH WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED BEFORE DISPOSAL. 9. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11. RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. 12. STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF DRAINAGE WAYS SUCH THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF WILL NOT BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. PROVIDE STABILIZATION MEASURES SUCH AS PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL BMP'S, SEEDING, OR OTHER COVERING AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT EROSION. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL BMP DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OF STORM WATER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING, CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUELS, LUBRICANT OILS, PESTICIDES, AND SOLID WASTE MATERIALS. 14. EROSION CONTROL BMP'S SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT, AND INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SHALL MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LOG AND RECORD ANY ADJUSTMENTS AND DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS WITHIN THE SWPPP DOCUMENTS STORED IN THE JOB SITE TRAILER. EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP BY NOTING ON THE SITE MAPS IN THE JOB SITE BINDER TO REFLECT THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND GENERAL CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SITE FOR THE DURATION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. AT A MINIMUM, UPDATES SHALL BE MADE DAILY TO TRACK CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS DESCRIBED IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTING THE LOCATION OF THE JOB SITE TRAILER, TEMPORARY PARKING & LAYDOWN AREAS, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL & MATERIAL STORAGE, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED FACILITIES THAT MAY IMPACT STORMWATER RUNOFF. SWPPP UPDATES & AMENDMENTS 116 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\UrbanWorks\Falcon Heights Affordable\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C3-EROS DETAILS.dwg October 16, 2023 - 2:42pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FOREROSION ANDSEDIMENTCONTROL DETAILSC301FALCON HEIGHTSAFFORDABLE HOUSINGBUHLFALCON HEIGHTSMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.DAN ELENBAAS, P.E.XX/XX/XXXXX44614DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16084401210/16/2023AS SHOWNPGSPGSDLEBIO-LOG PER MNDOT SPEC SECTION 3897, FILL WITH ROCK LOG PER MNDOT SPEC, CRUSHED CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE FL O W 5" Ø GEOTEXTILE SOCK, TYPE WOVEN MONOFILAMENT CONFORMING TO MNDOT SPEC. 3886 TABLE 3886-1J. MACHINE SLICE ENDS SECURELY CLOSED TO PREVENT LOSS OF OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE FILL, SECURED WITH 50 PSI ZIP TIE SEAM JOINED BY TWO ROWS OF STITCHING WITH A PLASTIC MESH BACKING OR HEAT BONDED GRADATION SIEVE SIZE PERCENT PASSING 1 1/2" 1" 3/4" 3/8" NO. 4 NO. 10 NO. 40 NO. 200 100 95-100 65-95 30-65 10-35 3-20 0-8 0-3VARIES,SEE PLAN6" MIN.SAND FILLVARIES, SEE TABLE 6"SAND FILL"D" DEPTH TO TOP OF PIPE "W" WIDTH OF INSULATION PERPENDICULAR TO PIPE "I" THICKNESS OF INSULATION REQUIRED 2 FT TO 3 FT 8 Ft 4 IN 3 FT TO 4 FT 8 Ft 4 IN 4 FT TO 5 FT 8 Ft 4 IN 5 FT TO 6 FT 4 Ft 2 IN 6 FT TO 7 FT 4 Ft 2 IN OVER 7 FT 0 Ft 0 IN 117 PROP. BUILDING FFE = 957.25 BFE = 947.25 AVE GRADE = 956.14 18.0'21.7'9.0' 60.0'30.0'23.0' 5.0' R33.0' R18.0' 24.0' R6.0' R6.0' R5.9' R11.0' 10.5'18.0'9 11 9 3 6.1'6.0'6.0'ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45 DEG 2' O.C. ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESSIBLE PARKING B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER RAIN GARDEN SEE SHEET C501. 23.0'74.3'LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION 62.3'355.7'69.0' 98.6' 22.0' 18.0'35.1'9.0'18.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'R5.6' R5.4'This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\UrbanWorks\Falcon Heights Affordable\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg October 17, 2023 - 11:39am©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONKnow what'sbelow. before you dig.Call RNORTH LEGEND PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 2.72 AC / 118,500 SF DISTURBED AREA 1.45 AC / 63,000 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2.30 AC / 100,319 SF EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 0.42 AC /18,181 SF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 2.07 AC / 90,293 SF PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 0.65 AC / 28,207 SF NET DECREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.23 AC / 10,026 SF SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING R5M PROPOSED ZONING R5M PROPOSED LAND USE HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTAL SITE PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF STOOPS, TRUCK DOCKS, TRASH ENCLOSURES & PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS. REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LIGHT POLES, CONDUITS, AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 2. REFER TO CERTIFIED SITE SURVEY OR PLAT FOR EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING EASEMENTS, PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, AND ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY & PARCEL INFORMATION. 3. DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE DRAWN TO THE FACE OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT, AND AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 4. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATING EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED WORK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TRAFFIC SIGNS, LIGHT POLES, ABOVEGROUND UTILITIES, ETC. PERFORM WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 5. TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 9.0-FEET IN WIDTH AND 18-FEET IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 6. MONUMENT SIGN(S) ARE DETAILED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIGN DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND REQUIRED PERMITS WITH THE OWNER.PREPARED FORSITE DIMENSIONPLANC400FALCON HEIGHTSAFFORDABLE HOUSINGBUHLFALCON HEIGHTSMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.DAN ELENBAAS, P.E.XX/XX/XXXXX44614DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16084401210/16/2023########PGSPGSDLEBUILDING DATA TOTAL BUILDING AREA 24,267 SF MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT N/A PARKING SUMMARY REQUIRED PARKING N/A TOTAL PROPOSED PARKING TBD PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FENCE SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION RIGHT OF WAY PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION CONCRETE SIDEWALK SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION STORM WATER AREA SEE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILS 118 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\UrbanWorks\Falcon Heights Affordable\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE DETAILS.dwg October 16, 2023 - 2:43pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORSITE DETAILSC401FALCON HEIGHTSAFFORDABLE HOUSINGBUHLFALCON HEIGHTSMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.DAN ELENBAAS, P.E.XX/XX/XXXXX44614DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16084401210/16/2023########PGSPGSDLEACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL N.T.S. 12" 6" 8" 6" 7 1/2" 13 1/2" 3/8" 7" 119 PROP. BUILDING FFE = 957.25 BFE = 947.25 AVE GRADE = 956.14 D60 LF - 36" RCP @ 0.94% 35 LF - 12" HDPE @ 8.43% 1.80%1.55%D D D D 4 LF - 6" PVC @ 1.00% 15 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.73% 7 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.73% 237 LF - 36" RCP @ 0.30% 63 LF - 36" RCP @ 0.30% PROPOSED 10' STORM SEWER EASEMENT956955954 948949950951952953952953952953953952956 95 6 955955 956957 956957 955SCARIFY EXISTING SOIL AND AVOID COMPACTION 51 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.73% ME:954.67 ME:954.59 ME:954.52 ME:953.45 ME:953.72 ME:953.67 953.20 953.20 947.25 947.25 947.25 947.20 947.20 947.20 ME:953.67 ME:953.35 ME:952.90ME:953.00 ME:951.65 953.50 954.10 ME:953.40 953.91TW:953.75 952.95953.45 956.20 956.20 955.65 BW:956.08 BW:957.23 955.79 955.29 955.70 955.20 955.64 955.18 955.55 955.09 954.75BW:955.49 TW:957.25 BW:956.60 BW:956.66 TW:957.25 957.25 956.89 ME:955.90 955.77 956.42 955.07955.20 955.34 ME:955.34 ME:955.41 ME:955.20 ME:954.85 956.75 955.34 955.38 955.20 956.65 BW:956.85957.12 TW:957.25 TW:957.25 957.25 TW:956.75 BW:948.18 BW:948.23 TW:953.75 953.75 951.98 952.12 952.61 952.76 TW:953.70 BW:953.69 TW:954.14 ME:955.01 ME:955.07 SALVAGED UNDERGROUND STORM CHAMBERS STMH 101 RE:954.27 OCS 301 RE:953.50 STUB TO BUILDING REF. MEP PLANS FOR CONTINUATION TRENCH DRAIN STMH 102 RE:953.59 OCS 201 RE:952.78 STMH 104 RE:954.66 STMH 103 RE:954.59 STMH 202 RE:954.86 CONNECT TO SALVAGED UNDERGROUND STORM CHAMBERS CONNECT TO SALVAGED UNDERGROUND STORM CHAMBERS 956.75 950 955 951952 953954 956957955953954956957956957 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\UrbanWorks\Falcon Heights Affordable\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C5-GRADING PLAN.dwg October 16, 2023 - 2:43pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTH GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. PERFORM GRADING WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 4. FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. 5. IN PAVED AREAS, ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE THE SITE READY FOR SUB-BASE. 6. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 7. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG CURB & GUTTER REPRESENT THE FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8. EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 9. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES THAT PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO COLLECTION POINTS. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 1.25% IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT AREAS AND A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.50% IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 10. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.50% ALONG CURB & GUTTER. REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD THE GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM THE GUTTER. 11. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4-INCHES OF AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL UNDER PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, AND TRAILS UNLESS OTHERWISE DETAILED. 12. GRADING FOR SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS, SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT STATE & NATIONAL ADA STANDARDS: ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 8.3% (1:12). SIDEWALK CROSS-SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 5.0%. ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS AND ACCESS AISLES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% IN ANY DIRECTION. A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1.50% IS PREFERRED. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVEMENT INSTALLATION. CHANGE ORDERS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR ADA COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, RESTORE ADJACENT OFFSITE AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH OR EXCEED THE ORIGINAL CONDITION. LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4-INCHES OF TOPSOIL. 14. EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D PROPOSED RIDGE LINE PROPOSED SWALE PROPOSED TOP/BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION TW:0.0 BW:0.0 Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R PREPARED FORGRADING ANDDRAINAGE PLANC500FALCON HEIGHTSAFFORDABLE HOUSINGBUHLFALCON HEIGHTSMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.DAN ELENBAAS, P.E.XX/XX/XXXXX44614DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16084401210/16/2023AS SHOWNPGSPGSDEEINFILTRATION BMP NOTES 1. TO THE EXTENT PRACTICABLE, LIMIT USE OF HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPOSED INFILTRATION BMP. UTILIZE AN EXCAVATOR WITH A TOOTHED BUCKET TO AVOID COMPACTING OR SMEARING OF SOILS. 2. AFTER INITIAL EXCAVATION AND ROUGH GRADING, PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) DOUBLE RING INFILTROMETER TESTS WITHIN THE INFILTRATION AREA AT THE ELEVATION OF THE BASIN BOTTOM. PROVIDE THE RESULTS TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMPLETING INSTALLATION OF THE BASIN OR UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. 3. IF CLAY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED, OVER-EXCAVATE AS NECESSARY TO REACH NATIVE SANDY/SILTY SOIL. BACKFILL THE ADDITIONAL EXCAVATION WITH SUITABLE ENGINEERED FILL MATERIAL. 4. IF NATIVE SUBGRADE SOILS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PROPOSED INFILTRATION AREA ARE DETERMINED TO NOT BE CONDUCIVE TO THE DESIGN INFILTRATION REQUIREMENTS, REMOVE AND REPLACE THE POORLY INFILTRATION SOILS TO A DEPTH WHERE THE EXISTING NATIVE SUBGRADE SOILS MEET OR EXCEED THE DESIGN INFILTRATION REQUIREMENTS AS REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FINAL EXCAVATION OF THE INFILTRATION AREA AND INSTALLATION OF ANY ENGINEERED SOIL MUST OCCUR IN DRY CONDITIONS TO PREVENT SMEARING AND COMPACTION. 6. REMOVE ANY EXCESS SOILS THAT ENTER THE INFILTRATION BASIN PRIOR TO FINAL STABILIZATION. 7. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INFILTRATION/FILTRATION SYSTEM INSTALLATION AND FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE TRIBUTARY AREA, PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT THE BMP DRAINS DOWN WITHIN 48 HOURS. RETAINING WALL NOTES 1. RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS. 2. PLANS SHOW THE HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF THE TOP OF THE WALL AND PROVIDES FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATIONS AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM FACE OF THE WALL ONLY. 3. RETAINING WALL DESIGN PLANS SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED TO THE REVIEWING AUTHORITY AND KIMLEY-HORN ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR APPROVAL. 4. RETAINING WALL DESIGNER MUST ACCOUNT FOR DRAINAGE AROUND THE WALL AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN. SURFACE RUNOFF SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO DRAIN OVER THE TOP OF THE WALL. 5. RETAINING WALL MATERIAL AND COLOR SHALL BE SELECTED BY THE OWNER. 6. RETAINING WALL DESIGNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION AS NEEDED FOR DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED WALL. 120 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\UrbanWorks\Falcon Heights Affordable\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C5-GRADING DETAILS.dwg October 16, 2023 - 2:44pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORGRADING DETAILSC501FALCON HEIGHTSAFFORDABLE HOUSINGBUHLFALCON HEIGHTSMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.DAN ELENBAAS, P.E.XX/XX/XXXXX44614DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16084401210/16/2023########PGSPGSDLE6" 2.5" MANHOLE (WALL OR BASE) WEIR REINFORCEMENT @ WALL AND BASE NOTES: 1. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE PRE-CAST ANCHORS: HVA ADHESIVE ANCHOR SYSTEM, WITH HVA ADHESIVE CAPSULES AND #5 REBAR, AS MANUFACTURED BY HILTI CORP. 2. REINFORCEMENT BARS IN WEIR NOT SHOWN. UPSTREAM SIDE OF WEIR DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF WEIR #4 ANCHOR PRE-CAST INTO MANHOLE 12" O.C. 121 PROP. BUILDING FFE = 957.25 BFE = 947.25 AVE GRADE = 956.14 CONNECT TO EX. SSWR MH IE:945.60 SE IE:945.46 E IE:945.46 W STUB PROP. SSWR IE:945.89 NW73 LF - 8 " PVC @ 0 .40% CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN W/ 6"X6" TEEPROPOSED GAS SERVICE AND METER EXISTING HYDRANT 45° BEND, PROVIDE MECHANICAL JOINTS PROPOSED 3" DOMESTIC SERVICE PROPOSED 6" FIRE SERVICE PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN W/ 6"X3" TEE PROPOSED 8" SSWR SERVICEPROPOSED FIBER OPTIC PROPOSED FIBER OPTIC This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\UrbanWorks\Falcon Heights Affordable\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C6-UTILITY PLAN.dwg October 16, 2023 - 2:44pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER LEGEND CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO EXISTING PROPOSED Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call PREPARED FORUTILITY PLANC600FALCON HEIGHTSAFFORDABLE HOUSINGBUHLFALCON HEIGHTSMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.DAN ELENBAAS, P.E.XX/XX/XXXXX44614DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16084401210/16/2023########PGSPGSDLEUTILITY PLAN NOTES 1. INSTALL UTILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY SPECIFICATIONS, STATE PLUMBING CODE, AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 4. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE: PVC: ASTM D-2729, D-3034 PVC SCH 40: ASTM D-1785, F-714, F-894 SANITARY SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE: PVC: ASTM D-2729, D-3034 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-2794, F-1866 5. WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE: PVC: ASTM D-1785, D-2241, AWWA C-900 DUCTILE IRON: AWWA C115 WATER MAIN FITTINGS SHALL BE: PVC: ASTM D-2464, D-2466, D-2467, F-1970, AWWA C-907 DUCTILE IRON: AWWA C-153, C-110, ASME 316.4 5. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76 HDPE: ASTM F-714, F-894 PVC: ASTM D-2729 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-1785, D-2665, F-794 DRAIN TILE SHALL BE: PE: ASTM F-6667 PVC: ASTM D-2729 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE: ASTM D-3212 PVC: ASTM D-2729, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-794, F-1866 6. WHEN CONNECTING TO AN EXISTING UTILITY LINE, FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION, DEPTH, AND SIZE OF THE EXISTING PIPE(S) PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE NEW LINES. NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. 7. PLACE AND COMPACT ALL FILL MATERIAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 8. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-6" COVER ON ALL WATER LINES. 9. FOR WATER LINES AND STUB-OUTS UTILIZE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 10. MAINTAIN 18-INCH MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION WHERE SEWER PIPE CROSSES WATER LINES (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). PROVIDE 10-FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN SEWER PIPE AND WATER LINES. 11. IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES (OR ANY OBSTRUCTION EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY PIPE MATERIAL SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR PVC C900 AND HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18-INCH VERTICAL SEPARATION MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 12. ALL PVC & HDPE SEWER AND WATER PIPE SHALL HAVE A TRACER WIRE INSTALLED IN THE TRENCH AND TERMINATED PER THE DETAILS. 13. UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PLACING BACKFILL. 14. IN PAVEMENT AREAS, RAISE MANHOLE CASTINGS TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. IN GREEN AREAS, RAISE MANHOLE CASTINGS TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION & INSTALL A WATERTIGHT LID. 15. REFER TO PLUMBING PLANS FOR LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND ROOF DRAINS TO THE INTERIOR BUILDING SYSTEMS. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) & METERS ARE LOCATED INSIDE THE BUILDING. 16. CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 17. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18. REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 19. EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILED SURFACE ELEVATIONS. 20. EXCESS MATERIAL, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNUSABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 21. COORDINATE WITH THE PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS. 22. WHERE STORM SEWER ROOF DRAINS HAVE LESS THAN 4-FEET OF COVER IN PAVED AREAS OR 3-FEET OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, PROVIDE 3-INCH THICK INSULATION A MINIMUM OF 5-FEET IN WIDTH, CENTERED ON THE PIPE. 23. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WATER-TIGHT CONNECTIONS. 24. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT. BOOTED COUPLERS AT THE STRUCTURE OR A WATER STOP WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT MAY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES. 25. CONTRACTOR SHALL AIR TEST ALL STORM SEWER PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. 122 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\UrbanWorks\Falcon Heights Affordable\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C6-UTILITY DETAILS.dwg October 16, 2023 - 2:45pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORUTILITY DETAILSC601FALCON HEIGHTSAFFORDABLE HOUSINGBUHLFALCON HEIGHTSMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.DAN ELENBAAS, P.E.XX/XX/XXXXX44614DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16084401210/16/2023########PGSPGSDLENO SCALE 48" OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE - RAIN GARDEN FLOW FLOW OCS SECTION B-B PLAN VIEW SEE PLANS FOR CASTING TYPE PRECAST MANHOLE SECTION CORE (1) 4" OPENING IN WEIR WALL. SYSTEM 2 IE: 952.50 #4 REBAR 12" O.C. EW SEE DETAIL FOR WEIR REINFORCEMENT @ WALL AND BASE INTEGRAL BASE OUTLET PIPE (SEE PLANS FOR MORE DETAIL) SYSTEM 2 IE: 951.50 RIM ELEVATION (SEE PLAN) WEIR ELEVATION SYSTEM 2 IE: 953.00 GROUT INFILL A A 12" PIPE FROM FES IE: 951.50 12"SECTION A-A NO SCALE 48" OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE - UNDERGROUND FLOW FLOW OCS SECTION B-B PLAN VIEW SEE PLANS FOR CASTING TYPE PRECAST MANHOLE SECTION CORE 10" OPENING IN WEIR WALL. SYSTEM 1 IE: 950.25 #4 REBAR 12" O.C. EW 24" PIPE FROM UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION SYSTEM SYSTEM 1 IE: 949.50 SEE DETAIL FOR WEIR REINFORCEMENT @ WALL AND BASE INTEGRAL BASE 24" PIPE (SEE PLANS FOR MORE DETAIL) SYSTEM 1 IE: 950.25 RIM ELEVATION (SEE PLAN) WEIR ELEVATION SYSTEM 1 IE: 952.25 GROUT INFILL A A SECTION A-A 10" ORIFICE ELEVATION ORIFACE INVERT SYSTEM 1: 950.25 VARIABLE 3" 64" 3" 5" 48" 48" 27" 16" 16" 4" ORIFICE ELEVATION ORIFACE INVERT SYSTEM 1: 952.50 123 AFFORDABLE MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 45'-3 1/8"62'-4"23'-5"98'-4"44'-5"355'-6"50'-3 5/8"25'-4 3/4"62'-4"162'-0"SURFACE PARKING 21 STALLS SURFACE PARKING 30 STALLS STORMWATER POND RETAINING WALL RAMP TO UNDERGROUND PARKING LARPENTEUR AVE WUNDERWOOD ST. COURTYARD128'-1 3/8"9'-0"18'-0"9'-0"9'-0"9'-0"ACCESSIBLE ROUTE9'-0"18'-0" GENERAL SITE NOTES: 1.DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING 2. 3. 4. DIMENSIONS AT CMU ARE TO FACE OF CMU UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED DIMENSIONS AT CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SITE NOTES AND FEATURES ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE. REFER TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR DETAIL.© URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2023901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PUD APPLICATION 10.16.2023 10/16/2023 3:54:49 PMC:\!Revit Project Files\23-0013 A22 Central_lfrazierNZVSX.rvtLARPENTEUR AVE W / FALCON HEIGHTS, MN 5511310/16/2024 23-0013 SITE PLAN Author Checker ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN AL101BUHL - FALCON HEIGHTS 1/16" = 1'-0"AL101 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN1 N124 GENERAL PLAN NOTES: 1.DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING 2.DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 3.DIMENSIONS AT UNIT DEMISING ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALLS 6.EXTEND ALL SHAFTS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING OR TOP OF ROOF PENETRATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE 8.ALL RESIDENTIAL DEMISING WALLS AT METAL STUD LOCATIONS ARE TYPE K3, K6, K6A, K8, K8A, AND K8B 1HR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 10.ALL RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS AT METAL STUD LOCATIONS ARE TYPE B6, 1 HR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 12.ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B ACCESSIBLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 13.MAINTAIN 8'-2" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT AT PARKING AREAS INDICATED ON PLANS, ALL OTHER PARKING AREAS SHALL PROVIDE 7'-2" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT 4.DIMENSIONS AT CMU ARE TO FACE OF CMU UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 7.NO PENETRATIONS OR OPENINGS ALLOWED IN SHAFT WALLS UNLESS THEY EXPRESSLY SERVE THE SHAFT 5.DIMENSIONS AT CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 9.ALL RESIDENTIAL DEMISING WALLS AT WOOD STUD LOCATIONS ARE TYPE V3, V6, V6A, V8, V8A, AND V8B 1HR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 11.ALL RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS AT WOOD STUD LOCATIONS ARE TYPE W6, 1 HR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 14.PROVIDE WALL BLOCKING AT KITCHEN WALLS AND ALL BATHROOM LOCATIONS INDICATED ON SHEET AR000 KEYNOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 B D EA F G H I J K L M N OC A301 2 A301 1 A3013 A301 416'-0"28'-6"16'-0"12'-6"24'-0"60'-6"36'-6"97'-0"12'-1"24'-0"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"28'-6"30'-0"17'-6"11'-0"16'-0"16'-0" 355'-6" PARKING 18'-0"24'-0"18'-0"18'-0"24'-0"18'-0"TYP.9'-0"TYP. 9'-0"62'-4"36'-0"WATER ELEC TRASH ELEV. LOBBY 62'-4"© URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2023901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PUD APPLICATION 10.16.2023 10/16/2023 3:54:44 PMC:\!Revit Project Files\23-0013 A22 Central_lfrazierNZVSX.rvtLARPENTEUR AVE W / FALCON HEIGHTS, MN 5511310/16/2024 23-0013 SITE PLAN Author Checker SUBLEVEL 1 - OVERALL PLAN A001.0BUHL - FALCON HEIGHTS Keynote Text 1/16" = 1'-0"A001.0 A001.0 - SUBLEVEL 1 PLAN - OVERALL1 N125 GENERAL PLAN NOTES: 1.DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING 2.DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 3.DIMENSIONS AT UNIT DEMISING ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALLS 6.EXTEND ALL SHAFTS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING OR TOP OF ROOF PENETRATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE 8.ALL RESIDENTIAL DEMISING WALLS AT METAL STUD LOCATIONS ARE TYPE K3, K6, K6A, K8, K8A, AND K8B 1HR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 10.ALL RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS AT METAL STUD LOCATIONS ARE TYPE B6, 1 HR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 12. ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B ACCESSIBLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 13.MAINTAIN 8'-2" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT AT PARKING AREAS INDICATED ON PLANS, ALL OTHER PARKING AREAS SHALL PROVIDE 7'-2" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT 4.DIMENSIONS AT CMU ARE TO FACE OF CMU UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 7.NO PENETRATIONS OR OPENINGS ALLOWED IN SHAFT WALLS UNLESS THEY EXPRESSLY SERVE THE SHAFT 5.DIMENSIONS AT CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 9.ALL RESIDENTIAL DEMISING WALLS AT WOOD STUD LOCATIONS ARE TYPE V3, V6, V6A, V8, V8A, AND V8B 1HR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 11.ALL RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS AT WOOD STUD LOCATIONS ARE TYPE W6, 1 HR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 14.PROVIDE WALL BLOCKING AT KITCHEN WALLS AND ALL BATHROOM LOCATIONS INDICATED ON SHEET AR000 KEYNOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 B D EA F G H I J K L M N OC A301 2 A301 1 A3013 A301 4 884 SF 2 BR UNIT 120 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 118 885 SF 2 BR UNIT 116 885 SF 2 BR UNIT 115 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 117 535 SF 1 BR UNIT 113 535 SF 1 BR UNIT 114 885 SF 2 BR UNIT 112 885 SF 2 BR UNIT 111 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 109 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 107 537 SF 1 BR UNIT 105 537 SF 1 BR UNIT 103 887 SF 2 BR UNIT 101 893 SF 2 BR UNIT 102 537 SF 1 BR UNIT 104 537 SF 1 BR UNIT 106 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 108 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 110 159'-11 7/8"24'-10 1/4"170'-3 7/8"62'-0"36'-0"98'-0"62'-0" 355'-2" BIKE STORAGE 128 LAUNDRY 119 MECH 122 TRASH 123 ACTIVITY ROOM 129 AMENITY 121 AMENITY 125 MANAGEMENT OFFICE 126 MAIL RESIDENTIAL LOBBY MEETING ROOM 127 AMENITY 124 © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2023901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PUD APPLICATION 10.16.2023 10/16/2023 3:54:45 PMC:\!Revit Project Files\23-0013 A22 Central_lfrazierNZVSX.rvtLARPENTEUR AVE W / FALCON HEIGHTS, MN 5511310/16/2024 23-0013 SITE PLAN Author Checker LEVEL 1 PLAN - OVERALL A101.0BUHL - FALCON HEIGHTS Keynote Text 1/16" = 1'-0"A101.0 A101.0 - LEVEL 1 PLAN - OVERALL1 N126 GENERAL PLAN NOTES: 1.DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING 2.DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 3.DIMENSIONS AT UNIT DEMISING ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALLS 6.EXTEND ALL SHAFTS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING OR TOP OF ROOF PENETRATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE 8.ALL RESIDENTIAL DEMISING WALLS AT METAL STUD LOCATIONS ARE TYPE K3, K6, K6A, K8, K8A, AND K8B 1HR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 10.ALL RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS AT METAL STUD LOCATIONS ARE TYPE B6, 1 HR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 12. ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B ACCESSIBLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 13.MAINTAIN 8'-2" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT AT PARKING AREAS INDICATED ON PLANS, ALL OTHER PARKING AREAS SHALL PROVIDE 7'-2" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT 4.DIMENSIONS AT CMU ARE TO FACE OF CMU UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 7.NO PENETRATIONS OR OPENINGS ALLOWED IN SHAFT WALLS UNLESS THEY EXPRESSLY SERVE THE SHAFT 5.DIMENSIONS AT CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 9.ALL RESIDENTIAL DEMISING WALLS AT WOOD STUD LOCATIONS ARE TYPE V3, V6, V6A, V8, V8A, AND V8B 1HR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 11.ALL RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS AT WOOD STUD LOCATIONS ARE TYPE W6, 1 HR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 14.PROVIDE WALL BLOCKING AT KITCHEN WALLS AND ALL BATHROOM LOCATIONS INDICATED ON SHEET AR000 KEYNOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 B D EA F G H I J K L M N OC A301 2 A301 1 A3013 A301 4 884 SF 2 BR UNIT 220 62'-0"36'-0"62'-0" 887 SF 2 BR UNIT 226 891 SF 2 BR UNIT 227 885 SF 2 BR UNIT 225 887 SF 2 BR UNIT 224 521 SF 1 BR UNIT 223 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 222 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 221 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 217 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 218 885 SF 2 BR UNIT 216 885 SF 2 BR UNIT 215 535 SF 1 BR UNIT 214 535 SF 1 BR UNIT 213 885 SF 2 BR UNIT 212 885 SF 2 BR UNIT 211 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 210 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 209 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 208 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 207 537 SF 1 BR UNIT 206 537 SF 1 BR UNIT 205 537 SF 1 BR UNIT 204 537 SF 1 BR UNIT 203 893 SF 2 BR UNIT 202 887 SF 2 BR UNIT 201 TRASH 231 LAUNDRY 229 355'-2"98'-0"ELEV. LOBBY 228 539 SF 1 BR UNIT 219 MECH 230 © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2023901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PUD APPLICATION 10.16.2023 10/16/2023 3:54:47 PMC:\!Revit Project Files\23-0013 A22 Central_lfrazierNZVSX.rvtLARPENTEUR AVE W / FALCON HEIGHTS, MN 5511310/16/2024 23-0013 SITE PLAN Author Checker LEVEL 2 PLAN - OVERALL A102.0BUHL - FALCON HEIGHTS Keynote Text 1/16" = 1'-0"A102.0 LEVEL 2 - 4 PLAN - OVERALL1 N127 REFER TO G005 AND G006 FOR ADDITIONAL EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTE INFORMATION 2.REFER TO SPECIFICAITON FOR DETAILED EXTERIOR MATERIAL INFORMATION GENERAL EXTERIOR NOTES: 1. KEYNOTES: LEVEL 1 957'-3" LEVEL 2 970'-8 7/8" ROOF 999'-2 1/2" SUBLEVEL 1 947'-3" LEVEL 3 980'-2 3/4" LEVEL 4 989'-8 5/8" BDE AFGHIJKLMNO LEVEL 1.1 961'-3" C [MET-PANEL-1][WDW-FG][BRICK-1][MET-PANEL-1][BRICK-1][CMU-1][MET-PANEL-1][BRICK-1][MET-PANEL-1][WDW-FG][MET-PANEL-1][CMU-1][AFS-SF-1][BRICK-1][DR-OVHD-SEC]AVG GRADE 956'-1 3/4"41'-11 1/2"43'-0 3/4"LEVEL 1 957'-3" LEVEL 2 970'-8 7/8" ROOF 999'-2 1/2" SUBLEVEL 1 947'-3" LEVEL 3 980'-2 3/4" LEVEL 4 989'-8 5/8" 123456 LEVEL 1.1 961'-3"[MET-PANEL-1][WDW-FG][BRICK-1][AFS-SF-1][AFS-SF-1][MET-PANEL-1][WDW-FG]AVG GRADE 956'-1 3/4"43'-0 3/4"41'-11 1/2"LEVEL 1 957'-3" LEVEL 2 970'-8 7/8" ROOF 999'-2 1/2" SUBLEVEL 1 947'-3" LEVEL 3 980'-2 3/4" LEVEL 4 989'-8 5/8" 1 2 3 4 LEVEL 1.1 961'-3"[CMU-1][MET-PANEL-1][WDW-FG]AVG GRADE 956'-1 3/4"43'-0 3/4"41'-11 1/2"LEVEL 1 957'-3" LEVEL 2 970'-8 7/8" ROOF 999'-2 1/2" SUBLEVEL 1 947'-3" LEVEL 3 980'-2 3/4" LEVEL 4 989'-8 5/8" B D EA F G H I J K L M N O LEVEL 1.1 961'-3" C [BRICK-1][WDW-FG][MET-PANEL-1][CMU-1][BRICK-1][MET-PANEL-1][WDW-FG][WDW-FG]AVG GRADE 956'-1 3/4"43'-0 3/4"41'-11 1/2"© URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2023901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PUD APPLICATION 10.16.2023 10/16/2023 3:54:48 PMC:\!Revit Project Files\23-0013 A22 Central_lfrazierNZVSX.rvtLARPENTEUR AVE W / FALCON HEIGHTS, MN 5511310/16/2024 23-0013 SITE PLAN Author Checker BUILDING ELEVATIONS A301BUHL - FALCON HEIGHTS Keynote Text [AFS-SF-1](08 41 13) ALUMINUM-FRAMED STOREFRONT, EXTERIOR APPLICATION, THERMALLY-BROKEN; CROSS-SECTION DIMENSIONS: 2" X 4.5"; FINISH: ANODIZED; COLOR: BLACK; GLAZING METHOD: CAPTURED PERIMETER, SSG INTERIOR [BRICK-1](04 20 01) BRICK MASONRY VENEER, FINISH 1 [CMU-1](04 27 31) REINFORCED CONCRETE UNIT MASONRY, BURNISHED FINISH [DR-OVHD-SEC] (08 36 13) OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR [MET-PANEL-1] (07 42 00.01) METAL WALL PANEL, RIBBED [WDW-FG](08 54 13) FIBERGLASS WINDOW, COLOR: BLACK 1/16" = 1'-0"A301 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST1 1/16" = 1'-0"A301 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH2 1/16" = 1'-0"A301 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH3 1/16" = 1'-0"A301 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST4 128 © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2023901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PUD APPLICATION 10.16.2023 10/16/2023 3:54:48 PMC:\!Revit Project Files\23-0013 A22 Central_lfrazierNZVSX.rvtLARPENTEUR AVE W / FALCON HEIGHTS, MN 5511310/16/2024 23-0013 SITE PLAN Author Checker BUILDING AXONOMETRIC VIEW A351BUHL - FALCON HEIGHTS VIEW LOOKING SOUTH VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST 129 © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2023901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PUD APPLICATION 10.16.2023 10/16/2023 3:54:48 PMC:\!Revit Project Files\23-0013 A22 Central_lfrazierNZVSX.rvtLARPENTEUR AVE W / FALCON HEIGHTS, MN 5511310/16/2024 23-0013 SITE PLAN Author Checker BUILDING AXONOMETRIC VIEW A352BUHL - FALCON HEIGHTS VIEW LOOKING SOUTHWEST VIEW LOOKING WEST 130 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning Commission at its regular meeting at 7:00 p.m. on October 24, 2023, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 2077 W. Larpenteur Ave, will hold a public hearing to consider the application of Buhl Larpenteur West LLC for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for 100 apartment units located directly to the west of the current Amber Union PUD. The application and other planning documents will be available upon request no later than October 20, 2023. It will also be available on the City’s website at www.falconheights.org. If you have any questions regarding the public hearing, please contact Hannah Lynch, Community Development Coordinator at (651) 792-7613 or hannah.b.lynch@falconheights.org. Dated: October 13, 2023 Hannah B. Lynch, Community Development Coordinator City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota 131 CITY of FALCON HEIGHTS PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission at its regular meeting at 7:00 p.m. on October 24, 2023, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 2077 W. Larpenteur Ave, will hold a public hearing to consider the application of Buhl Larpenteur West LLC for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for 100 apartment units located directly to the west of the current Amber Union PUD. The application and other planning documents will be available upon request no later than October 20, 2023. It will also be available on the City’s website. If you have any questions regarding the public hearing, please contact Hannah Lynch, Community Development Coordinator at (651) 792-7613 or hannah.b.lynch@falconheights.org. 132 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY 1 | P a g e Kayla Tsuchiya, being duly sworn on oath, says: that she is, and during all times herein state has been, Inside Sales Representative of Northwest Publication, LLC., Publisher of the newspaper known as the Saint Paul Pioneer Press, a newspaper of General circulation within the City of St. Paul and the surrounding Counties of Minnesota and Wisconsin including Ramsey and Kanabec. That the notice hereto attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper and was printed and published therein on the following date(s): Saturday, October 14, 2023 Newspaper Ref./AD Number#:_71509437_ Client/Advertiser:_City of Falcon Heights _______________________________________ AFFIANT SIGNATURE Subscribed and sworn to before me this 16th day of October, 2023 True Lee _______________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC Ramsey County, MN My commission expires January 31, 2025 133 October 13, 2023 Dear Resident: You are cordially invited to a public hearing before the Falcon Heights Planning Commission for the purpose of taking public comment regarding a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a building with 100 apartments to be located directly to the west of Amber Union apartments. The location of this development is PIN 212923110029 and PIN 212923110028, to the west of Amber Union apartments with a driveway along Larpenteur Avenue West. The plan will include 100 residential apartments, consisting of a mix of 1- and 2- bedroom units, with surface and sublevel parking. The Planning Commission will meet and hold a Public Hearing on these matters on Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 7:00 PM at Falcon Heights City Hall, 2077 Larpenteur Avenue West, Falcon Heights, MN 55113. During the meeting on Tuesday, October 24, city staff will present information regarding the PUD. The Planning Commission will also hear public comment and discuss before making a recommendation to City Council. The application and other planning documents will be available upon request no later than October 20, 2023. It will be also be available on the City’s website. If you have questions or comments before the hearing, you may contact City Hall at 651-792-7600 or myself directly at hannah.b.lynch@falconheights.org. Sincerely, Hannah B. Lynch City of Falcon Heights Community Development Coordinator 134 Sec. 113-35 - Amendments (a) Initiation of amendments. An amendment to this chapter may be initiated by the city council, the planning commission, or by petition of a property owner whose property would be affected by the proposed amendment. (b) Application for amendment. All applications for amendments initiated by a property owner shall be filed with the zoning administrator on an official application form. The application shall be accompanied by a fee established by city council resolution and a cash escrow, in an amount determined by the zoning administrator, to reimburse the city for all out-of-pocket costs the city may incur in reviewing the application. When the amendment involves the changing of zoning district boundaries, the application shall be accompanied by an abstractor's certified property certificate listing the property owners within 350 feet of the boundaries of the property to which the amendment relates. (c) Public hearing. When a proposed amendment to this chapter has been properly initiated, the city clerk shall call a public hearing before the planning commission. A notice of the time, place, and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the city's official newspaper at least ten days prior to the hearing. When an amendment involves changes in district boundaries affecting an area of five acres or less, a similar notice shall be mailed at least ten days before the date of the hearing to each owner of affected property and property situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property to which the amendment relates. The failure to give mailed notice to individual property owners, or defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceeding, provided a bona fide attempt to comply has been made. The planning commission shall conduct the hearing and make a recommendation to the city council. (d) Action by city council. The city council shall not act upon a proposed amendment until it has received the recommendation of the planning commission or until 60 days after the first regular planning commission meeting at which the proposed amendment was considered. (e) Consistency with comprehensive plan. No amendment to this chapter shall be adopted which is in conflict with the city's comprehensive plan. (f) Time deadline; approval requirements. Pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 15.99, an application for an amendment must be approved or denied within 60 days from the date a properly completed application is received by the city unless the time period is waived by the applicant or extended as provided by statute. Approval of an amendment shall require a majority vote of all the members of the city council. Amendments which change all or part of the existing classification of a zoning district from residential to either commercial or industrial require a two-thirds majority vote of all members of city council. (Code 1993, § 9-15.05; Ord. No. 97-06, § 1, 9-24-1997) State Law reference – Amendments, Minn. Stats. § 462.357, subds. 2 – 4. 135 Amber Flats PUD – Notes from Ramsey County Scott Mareck, Senior Transportation Planner, Multimodal Planning: Ramsey County has reviewed this site plan and have the following comments: • Right-of-Way: If this site is platted 50 feet of right-of-way dedication will be required by Ramsey County along Larpenteur Avenue, per the attached Ramsey County Major Street Plan (COPIED BELOW) (Contact: Dan Baar – County Surveyor – copied). • Traffic: See attached email (COPIED BELOW) with traffic comments previously provided to developer representative, David Miller. Trip generation study is requested to include impact to/from nearby transit stop and recommendation regarding long crosswalk distance and its effect on increased usage by housing development (Contact: Luis Flores – County Traffic Engineer – copied). • Stormwater/Drainage: Please provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) (Contact – Molly Churchich – County Environmental Services – copied). • Permitting: Sanitary connection permit will be required from Ramsey County. 136 137 David – Great talking to you. Per our conversation, relocating the access eastward and resizing it will have to take into consideration the presence of the raised median, highlighted in red below: With change in land use, it’s important to understand the frequency of westbound left turning vehicles and the possibility of them “spilling” onto the inner westbound through lane. If it’s proposed that the raised median be eliminated to allow for queuing of more than one left turning vehicle it is also important to note how this would affect storage/operations for east left turning vehicles onto St. Mary’s St. Going beyond your inquiry about access, it would also be useful to know how the new development will affect transit boarding/alighting at the corner of Fry St. Please let me know if any other questions/comments come up. Have a good weekend, Luis C. Flores, PE, PTOE | Engineer III | Traffic 138 Amber Flats PUD – Notes from City Engineer Stephanie Smith, Falcon Heights Interim City Engineer: We have reviewed the submitted plans for the Amber Flats PUD Application and offer the following comments: - Resubmit drainage maps and HydroCAD analysis for the 2 year, 10 year, and 100 year storm events for existing and proposed conditions using Atlas 14 rainfall data. Additional comments may be generated once this information can be reviewed. - Include pre and post underground storm tank calculations in HydroCAD - Runoff calculations should use the Weighted-Q or SBUH weighting, instead of the Weighted CN. - Confirm 85% of new impervious surface is treated through a stormwater BMP. - Provide soil borings with infiltration rates, at a minimum, one in the location of the proposed BMP(s). - The 100yr HWL within the proposed underground system must be kept below the top of rock section. Modify the BMP(s) as needed. - Rock backfill for BMP(s) shall be angular granite or approved equal, and not limestone or other carbonate material - Provide pretreatment of stormwater for sediment and gross floatables prior to discharge into the proposed BMP(s) (ex. sump w/ a hood or a baffle, or alt.). - Berm height must be minimum 6” higher than 100yr HWL for basin(s). - Label Emergency Overflow (EOF) routes from all low points and show elevations of high point along EOF route. Elevation must meet free-boarding requirements for nearby structures. - Provide a planting plan/restoration plan for the disturbed soils and BMP(s). - Add a note on the SWPPP and Utility Page that a City-approved dewatering/pumping plan is required prior to any pumping activity. Notify the City prior to beginning any pumping activity. - Add a note to the Erosion Control Sheet to notify City prior to beginning any and all construction activity to verify Erosion Control Measures are in place. - Add a note to the Grading Plan to notify City at least 24 hours prior to the construction of stormwater BMPs. - Provide language for proposed public easements. - Provide a copy of the Watershed District Permit(s), or documentation that a permit is not required. - Provide a copy of the NDPES Permit(s), or documentation that a permit is not required. - Provide a copy of the Ramsey County Permit(s), or documentation that a permit is not required. - Provide a copy of the MNDoT Permit(s), or documentation that a permit is not required. 139 - Watermain work shall be coordinated with St Paul Regional Water. - Provide an executed Operation & Maintenance Agreement in favor of the City of Roseville that has been recorded with Ramsey County. The template agreement can be found at www.cityofroseville.com/privatebmp. - Provide an Operation & Maintenance plan for all stormwater BMP’s. The Maintenance plan should include a narrative of maintenance and inspection activities, schedule, BMP locations, design details, contact person responsible for long-term maintenance, etc. An example can be found at: www.cityofroseville.com/privatebmp. - Submit contact information for the trained erosion control coordinator responsible for implementing the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the site. If that person has not been selected, a SWPPP Amendment is required prior to construction. - Plans signed by a Professional Engineer licensed in Minnesota, prior to issuance of permits. - An asbuilt for site grading and stormwater infrastructure will be required prior to final approval and release of Erosion Control and Grading escrow money. - Plans shall use Roseville Standard Detail Plates for construction. - All public utility materials and construction shall meet the latest City of Roseville specifications. - Provide Pedestrian Access Route for use during construction for the south Larpenteur Avenue sidewalk. - Plan revised to show pavement removal and restoration on Larpenteur Avenue associated with construction of the sanitary sewer service connection. - Sanitary sewer service shall be connected to a wye on the main within Larpenteur Avenue, unless approved by the City. Approved manhole connections require a KOR-N-SEAL connection or approved equal and must match the existing invert. 140 Amber Flats PUD – Notes from Fire Marshal Adrian Neis, Falcon Heights Fire Marshal: - If we are only reviewing site plan, my comments would be 20’ minimum width for access roads. - Supported weight of road - Dimensions of the south parking area for turnaround. - FD access within 150’ interior? I would have to see if allowable increases for fully sprinklered. - Is this 13r or 13 sprinkler system? - Fdc location. 141 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS Planning Commission City Hall 2077 West Larpenteur Avenue MINUTES October 24th, 2023 at 7:00 P.M. A. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M. B. ROLL CALL: Scott Wilson _X_ Laura Paynter _X_ Jacob Brooks _X_ Mike Tracy _X_ Jim Mogen _X_ Rick Seifert _X_ Jake Anderson _X_ Council Liaison Gustafson _X_ Staff Liaison Lynch _X_ C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Paynter made a motion to approve agenda; approved 7-0. D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Regular Meeting – September 26, 2023 2. Workshop – September 26, 2023 Council Liaison Gustafson noted an incorrect date on the September 26, 2023 workshop minutes. Commissioner Anderson made a motion to approve September 26, 2023 workshop minutes with the updated date, and the September 26, 2023 regular meeting minutes. Minutes were approved 7-0. E. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Amber Flats – PUD Proposal Chair Wilson invited Staff Liaison Lynch to give an overview of the PUD proposal. Staff Liaison Lynch described the project and went through City Code requirements and how this proposal does and does not meet City Code. The proposal is for Amber Flats, a 100- unit affordable housing apartment building to be located in the parking lot directly to the west of the existing Amber Union Apartments. The plan is for sixty 1-bedroom units and forty 2-bedroom units. 114 parking spaces are proposed, with 51 of them being 142 surface-level parking spaces and 63 of them being located sublevel in a garage below the apartment building. City Code dictates apartment buildings located in the R-5M zoning district to have a maximum of 40 dwelling units per acre, have setbacks of 30’ in the front, 10’ or ½ the height of the building on the side, 30’ on the rear, and 50’ abutting R-1 zoned property. The proposal meets all of these standards. It is proposed to have 39 dwelling units per acre, have over 128’ from the building to any R-1 zoned property (east side), have a setback of over 45’ on the front, over 25’ on the west side, and over 50’ on the rear side of the property. City Code also dictates requirements about the height of buildings, impervious surface, and parking. These are three areas the proposal does not meet the requirements. Buildings must have a maximum height of 40’ or four stories, whichever is less. This project is going to end up being around 43’ in height. Additionally, there is a maximum impervious surface coverage amount of the property of 75%. After the completion of the project, the property will be 76% impervious. Finally, for an apartment building in R-5M with 100 units, 200 parking spaces would be required, with 160 of those located underground in a garage in the same building as the apartments. Currently 114 parking spaces are proposed, with 51 of them being surface-level parking spaces and 63 of them being located sublevel in a garage below the apartment building. Staff Liaison Lynch then handed the presentation off to Harrison Mohagan from Buhl Investors and David Miller from UrbanWorks Architecture LLC. Harrison Mohagan began by giving an overview of the timeline of development on the southwest corner of Larpenteur and Snelling Avenues and an update on Amber Union’s progress for occupancy and awards they have received. He stated there were several takeaways from the Caribou proposal which was rejected in March 2023, including the need for more density, a concern over traffic impacts from the drive-through, necessary pedestrian improvements, and idling car concerns. With these takeaways, Buhl and UrbanWorks have come up with the design for Amber Flats. David Miller gave a brief overview on the design choices for Amber Flats. The idea is for Amber Flats to look to Amber Union for its design, but rather than imitating a historic design, instead draw respectful inspiration. Amber Flats is set back from the road to have the front of the building align with the front of Amber Union. They are also planning to utilize the existing Larpenteur curb cut, but narrow it slightly, and possibly move it east, depending on Ramsey County. They are also looking to add sidewalks and pathways through the site for pedestrians. Miller continued with his presentation and stated the reason for the height being 3’ over what City Code requires is due to poor soil qualities and contamination issues. This determines how the underground garage is placed, which pushed the entire building slightly higher. In addition, the goal was to maintain a smaller footprint on the site so going taller was the best option for this. He also addressed the parking difference. As a parking lot, the area was far over the allowed impervious surface amount, and their plan brings that down. However, if they were to include the required amount of parking, 143 which they feel is too much parking, it would again raise the amount of impervious surface on the property. The intent was to find a balance in these areas. Harrison Mohagan continued the presentation and gave an overview of the project benefits, looking to the Falcon Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposal will provide multifamily housing along a transit line and the Larpenteur Corridor, it will shrink existing pavement surface by .23 acres, it will provide a better pedestrian experience along Larpenteur, provide new patrons for businesses in the area, deliver new housing without impacting parking reserved for Amber Union, and retain trees along the southeast of the site, adjacent to Hollywood Court. Finally, Mohagan addressed parking by stating Amber Union currently only uses 90% of their 135 parking stalls, leaving an excess of 13 stalls. Utilizing the same method and assuming Amber Flats would also utilize only 90% of their 114 stalls, there would be an excess of 11 parking spots, leaving an excess of 24 parking stalls for the two developments. Following these presentations, Chair Wilson opened the Public Hearing for comments. 1. Maureen Hanson Cox – 1639 Larpenteur Avenue, Cox Insurance – Mentioned the Comprehensive Plan references affordable housing for older citizens and students. Stated she believes for housing for the UofM students and older citizens would be great, but she doesn’t believe that is what this affordable housing will be. 2. Emily Benz – 1746 St. Mary’s Street – Concerns over parking; stated between the two buildings, there should be around 450 parking spots, but only around 250 are allocated. She asked if the demographics change, if more parking spots are needed, what are the contingency plans. She also asked about the number of spots for guest parking. 3. Val Gyurci – 1607 Hollywood Court – Concerns over how trash will be handled; Amber Union is currently having issues with trash control. Asked if trash would be self-contained within the building and if it would be retrieved, but having it outside and accessible has not been positive for Amber Union. 4. Farook Meah – 1597 Hollywood Court – Believes parking will be a problem. Mr. Meah stated he asked previous City Administrator about Amber Union parking and was told it would be addressed when it became a problem. Believes now the parking there is an issue. He does not want additional residents parking on Hollywood Court with people parking late at night on the road. Also concerned about safety and security, and trash control issues. Asked if trash would be the same as east Amber Union building or annex building. 5. Irene Gengler – 1611 Hollywood Court – Does not understand where the sidewalks are that are being referenced. Stated there are not sidewalks and asked where you can walk in Falcon Heights currently, other than crossing Snelling and Larpenteur. 6. Hannah Conner – 91 Mid Oaks Lane, Roseville – Stated she has an office on Larpenteur and the sidewalks and street crossings are not used. Questions about if there is a City Code for restrictions, why is it not followed. Also asked if an 144 accommodation was made for Amber Union, how and why that is the new standard. Suspicious that Caribous was never a viable option but was rather a proposal with the housing to follow all along. Also asked about occupancy of 1- bedroom and 2-bedroom apartments. Concerns over traffic and cars with parking, as well as about safety. Stated she works across from there and sees police cars in the parking lot very often. She stated the calls to the police department have increased significantly since Amber Union was built and adding another 100-units would again increase that. 7. Rice Davis – 1407 California Avenue – Asked the height of 1550 Larpenteur and clarified the height of Amber Union. Asked the sizes of the units. Also needs definition on what affordable housing means and what would that be in dollar- terms. 8. Joan Paulson – 1511 Idaho Avenue – Stated the big issue is the parking being far off from the current City Code. Asked if the underground parking for Amber Flats would be assigned with each unit, or if the underground parking is an additional cost. Stated there could be underground spots with no one able to afford it. Stated this is a simple math problem. A new unit is being put in that is oversized for the space it has. Cut down the number of units to cut down the number of parking spots. There could be fewer units by adding larger units instead of the smaller ones, or cut off the back of the building or one of the stories. 9. Emily Benz (Second statement) – 1746 St. Mary’s Street – Stated where her home is located, she either has to pull out onto Larpenteur or onto Snelling. Otherwise, they have to go about 2 miles out of the way to loop around to Fairview to then go to Snelling. She has young drivers and when they leave the house, they are nervous that they are trying to make left-hand turns at uncontrolled intersections. Stated an additional 100 cars daily will further back up the traffic. Also has noticed an increased police presence. She made a call to Ramsey County and in the past 365 days there have been 403 calls for service at Amber Union. Has concerns about adding at least another 140 people on that corner. 10. Victoria Long – 1717 Albert Street – Wanted to echo concerns about policing especially in light of how Falcon Heights has changed in that area in the last 8 years, and how the city is currently unclear on the future of the policing. Believes another 100 units will impact that. States that City also recently received a grant for the Larpenteur & Snelling Corridor Development Study, and approving this before the study is completed does not make sense. Stated plans will have changed after study is completed by experts. 11. Connie Aiken – 1589 Hollywood Court – Seconded a lot of things that have been said about trash, being accessible getting in and out of the area of Hollywood Court, and about parking. She has heard that Amber Union is charging extra for guest parking and overflow parking at Amber Union is not being used. The road in front of her house is now a normal parking spot and it would be nice for her guests to have room to park too. She has also spoken to police in the area and they are checking on Amber Union every day. She has seen 1 AM parties, there has been a shooting, a stolen car in her neighborhood. Seems like more than they used to deal with in the past. She also sent a message off to Trader Joe’s to find out if they would considering building in the space. 145 12. Gary Kwong – 1700 Fry Street – Board President of Metropolitan Interfaith Council on Affordable Housing – Supports having 60% AMI ($60,000 annual salary) housing at this site. Has worked with many immigrants who do not make that annually when they first arrive. Immigrants do not have $30K instant income and also find housing unless you have 80% AMI housing, which is expensive and not profitable for a developer, and it’s difficult to get grants for that sort of building. Regarding crime and traffic, it is not disproportionate to the population of Falcon Heights. Additionally, Falcon Heights does not want to drop below 5,000 in population because then it would not be a city of the first class which would reduce subsidies. In St. Paul, everyone has to pay yearly for a street parking permit because the street parking is not owned by the residents. Stated some of the police calls are emergency medical and fire calls. It is disproportionate to his house emergency calls, but there are more people there so there will be more calls. Supports more public housing because MetCouncil still has requirements for each city to have enough affordable and workforce housing and the city needs to maintain that standard. 13. Chuck Laszewski – 1713 St. Mary’s Street – Was at the Caribou hearing and was opposed to that, however he is in support of this proposal. Neighbors have raised legitimate concerns and hopes Planning Commission will find a way to mitigate some of those concerns. This proposal is consistent with the City’s goals and the comprehensive plan, unlike the drive-through proposal. It is a necessary element in the battle to combat global warming. To reduce the use of fossil fuels, citizens need to live in more densely-constructed housing in cities with easier access to stores and jobs by foot and transit. Amber Flats does this perfectly. Amber Union being at 100% occupancy while only using 90% of its parking is not a fluke. Younger generations today do not own cars at the same rate as the older generations. This is a continuing trend. We also have good transit in both directions. Falcon Heights is only 2.2 square miles. Remove the UofM and State Fair, both non-taxable, and Falcon Heights is only 1 square mile. As such, the state kicks in around 40% of the City budget. The City does not have its own fire department or police department. We do have our own parks and rec department but if kids want to participate they have to go to Roseville or St. Paul. In order to remain a separate City, we need to approve as many legitimate tax-paying developments as possible in the one square mile. Amber Flats does this. Stated that when Philando Castile was gunned down in 2016, the City appointed a task force which came up with dozens of recommendations on policing and inclusion. One recommendation which was approved by City Council was to invest in continuously sustaining and expanding affordable housing options. Amber Flats fits that. Stated that he and his wife lived in federally-subsidized housing when he got his first job and his household did not reach anywhere near $60,000, and he believes they were still okay neighbors. Finally, regarding crime, the City Council has been dealing with this. A consultant was hired last year to do an in-depth analysis on crime and policing in Falcon Heights, and two of his major points were that looking at 2018 through last year, the total number of incidences reported to the sheriff’s office declined from 2781 in 2018 to 2163 last year, which also includes three months of 146 occupancy at Amber Union. The second point was that over those five years, the daily calls to police by Falcon Heights residences averaged two. 14. Maureen Hanson Cox (second statement) – 1639 Larpenteur Avenue, Cox Insurance – Regarding taxes, would like to know what Amber Union pays in property taxes compared to what 1639 Larpenteur pays in property taxes. 15. Victoria Long (second statement) – 1717 Albert Street – One additional suggestion, possibly make Hollywood Court permit parking. 16. Irene Gengler (second statement) – 1611 Hollywood Court – State she and the Hollywood Court residents dread the State Fair in terms of parking. It is hard to get parking permits to guests. They get lost or fall down, and she does not believe permit parking on Hollywood Court is a good idea. 17. Ric Cox – 1639 Larpenteur Avenue – Cox Insurance – Stated 10-12 years ago when his family purchased 1639 Larpenteur, he spoke with the City about a PUD. The property was then mostly parking lot. The City turned him down and stated it was not acceptable and they would need to go by City Code requirements. They have invested a fair amount into the building and add value to the community. This year they did a remodel, and they recently asked about getting help on a few issues. They would like to add more parking for the growth of their firm and they were told by the City that they would need to stay within the Code for impervious surface. He respects that he is supposed to stay within guidelines of the Code. They have also experienced the changes of habits of community and employees, but they know they will not have enough parking in their location. They also don’t have enough cold storage and can’t add more because they are at the maximum amount for impervious surface, even though they added a lot of green space when they developed the building originally. He would like Council to be consistent. If they approve the PUD, it basically allows the developers to not follow the Code and apply for a variance. He believes this is important. Roseville has not allowed a PUD since 2009 because it is inconsistent and they prefer to stay within the Code, which possibly should be rewritten. If they cannot add a few parking spots, and the proposal is asking to reduce the parking by around 40%, why is that justified. Roseville stated they would allow adjustments within 5% of the Code. 40% is significant, but they want to add a few parking spots for snow storage or growth and they were told that is not likely to happen. He also feels they have a responsibility as business owners to be good citizens to provide walkways, more parkland, etc., and there is not enough of that in the area. It would be more acceptable if they were asking for a reduction in parking allowance and were providing a park for Falcon Heights. He stated the Amber Union tenants use their parking lot for a basketball court, sleeping in their alley, etc., and they have not called Ramsey County Sheriff’s Department. Doesn’t believe the statistics other residents mentioned regarding crime were accurate because he thinks they’ve changed. They would like to remain there but if there is a PUD allowed, that is pretty inconsistent when they are just asking for a little help on their end. 18. Kent Paulson – 1511 Idaho Avenue – Wants to make sure Ric Cox’s question and concerns are addressed by the end of the meeting. There are three problems with the proposal that are being overlooked and yet they were not willing to bend for Cox Insurance. Would like one member of the Planning Commission address 147 that and tell them why. Planning Commission Chair Wilson explained that has nothing to do with the PUD today and that matter did not come before the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission does not know anything about the issue. 19. Farook Meah (second statement) – 1597 Hollywood Court – Agrees with Ms. Gengler that parking permits on Hollywood Court would be harsh on the residents. Instead of that, putting a “residential parking only” sign up. They pay for the surfacing of the road there and the resurfacing of the alley, and he still wants to question their safety. There are no lights on the street and they need to be considered. 20. Chuck Long – 1717 Albert Street – Stated he would not be addressing the merits of the proposal because he does not believe the Planning Commission should address the merits of the proposal at this time. Wants to talk about process and procedure. He is aware of the City applying for and receiving a $50,000 grant to study the Larpenteur & Snelling corridor. The study has been started but not completed. Given that the City has obtained a sizeable investment, and it probably talks about a long-range plan and the highest and best uses of the corridor, and the recommendations forthcoming from that, to take any action that would impact that study before the information from the study been received, the purpose of the study is being defeated if projects are being approved before even having the benefit of that information. If the study is going to be done, step back and wait to benefit from the study and recommendations, and then make decisions. 21. Kristen Tran – 1745 Arona Street – Understands affordable housing, but in her backyard she has heard the sirens. She knows it may not all be crime and could be medical, but the more people being added the more it increases the traffic and things like that. Just believes a look should be taken at that and about adding more people and traffic, and the study. 22. Joan Paulson (second statement) – 1511 Idaho Avenue – Noted that a few references from the packet to City Code were incorrect and need to be updated. She also requests that acronyms be defined in the document and in the hearing. Chair Wilson called twice for additional speakers before calling for a motion to end the hearing. Commissioner Mogen moved to close the public hearing, hearing was closed by consent. F. NEW BUSINESS 1. Amber Flats – PUD Proposal Chair Wilson opened the floor for comments, questions, and discussion from Commissioners. Planning Commission Questions: • Commissioner Tracy – Asked why the decision was made to only have 1- and 2- bedroom units. Harrison Mohagen stated was purely economical. These projects 148 are becoming more difficult to execute and Amber Union had so many because it was a historic building with strange layouts and they were able to add the larger units into it. They were happy to include these units at that time because the economic outlook was different then, but now decisions about unit-mix comes back to efficiency. Stated otherwise a deal like this, that is already difficult to find funding for, is simply not possible. • Commissioner Mogen – What is the trash plan for the new building? Mohagen stated the plan for Amber Flats would be like the east building of Amber Union, with interior trash and trash chutes. Regarding the trash issues brought up by residents about the outdoor trash at Amber Union, they currently hold townhalls at the apartment building to educate residents on the proper ways to bring trash to the dumpsters. • Commissioner Mogen – Asked about the plan for guest parking and charging for parking. Mohagen stated they would plan to charge for the underground parking. They have looked at comparables in the Twin Cities to inform them about this on the cost, and it has not been determined yet. For the surface parking, there would be a small service fee or no fee. There is permitted parking for all of the stalls and a guest parking area designated for guests, employees, and people coming in to inquire about leasing. Mogen asked if Amber Union charges for parking. Mohagen stated it does not currently. They are working with the property manager there to have everyone in Amber Union sign a parking agreement, regardless of if they use it, so they can identify and address issues. • Mayor Gustafson – Asked if they currently utilize permit parking at Amber Union for the residents. Mohagen answered they do, but it can be better. They are wanting everyone to sign an agreement rather than just have a fob, so they can track everyone in a spot and any potential problems that arise. • Commissioner Mogen – Asked if the trees in the plan along Larpenteur and Underwood would be able to be added as a condition of the PUD. Mohagen answered yes, they are committed to tree preservation and addition. • Chair Wilson – How many parking spots at Amber Flats will be for guests/employees/future tenants, and is it park of the 114 total proposed? Mohagen answered he does not have an exact number, but it would typically be driven by the property manager. Making an assumption, he would probably say they would attribute the parking that they believe would end up being extra (10% from the presentation) to the designated guest/employee parking. • Harrison Mohagen additionally wanted to address a few points made by Hannah Conner (91 Mid Oaks Lane, Roseville). At the time of the Caribou proposal, they did have a phase two which was multifamily affordable housing. They would have loved to do the Caribou deal, but Caribou and other coffee places are also only doing the drive-through only options. • Chair Wilson thanked Mohagen and Buhl for bringing back another plan but there are still a few questions to address. • Vice-Chair Paynter – Asked about exterior lighting. The City of Falcon Heights does not do a great job at street lighting. Asked them to talk about exterior lighting. David Miller stated they want to make sure surfaces in a public area are safe a secure. A lighting plan hasn’t been done yet, but they’d probably have 149 downlights along the building and on sidewalks. They would also have typically lit parking lot standards with full cutoff fixtures and dark sky compliance. • Vice-Chair Paynter – Asked if the tan brick in the renders would be on a different plane. Miller stated that is still being priced out so he can’t commit or promise anything, but they’d like to be able to do the vertical stack bond. • Vice-Chair Paynter – Asked if they would be getting any money from the state for financing on this project. Mohagen stated they are not. They are investigating every and all grants possible. They are currently pursuing the Emerging Developer Grant from Ramsey County and would look to pursue any other grants through the county or other public agencies. He thanked the City of Falcon Heights as they were a huge help with getting grants for Amber Union, whether by supporting via a resolution or otherwise, and they were able to identify and be awarded about $3 million in grants. They have been successful in getting grants in the past for projects, and that is underway. • Commissioner Brooks – If they were approved for the PUD status, is the funding in place to complete the project? Mohagen stated not yet, but getting the approval would be the green light to start the bonding process. For Amber Union, they received approval for the project then went into the bond process four times, and you can only do this every six months. It is extremely difficult to complete deals currently, and it is not a lucrative project. They still want to do it and are passionate about affordable housing. They will try to get every grant possible and make the bond process easier and quicker. In the past they deepened the AMI on Amber Union to jump ahead in the order for bonding. Miller added that often having an approved project improves the scoring to receive those bonds. • Commissioner Tracy – Do they know now what rent will be? Mohagen stated there is a guideline for affordable housing but he didn’t have it in front of him. City Administrator Jack Linehan stated the guidelins are set and they vary per year. They look at AMI which is set annually. They don’t know what it will be, but if they were to assume the AMI is $100,000, 60% AMI would be $60,000, which would be the limit of income. Affordable housing is considered to be 30% of the take-home pay which would set the rent at around $1500/month. • Commissioner Mogen – Is this receiving TIF funding, or is it the plan to receive TIF funding? Mohagen stated they will try to get every grant, but it is possible. But the City has not approved TIF funding at this point. • Commissioner Mogen – What is the plan if the grants don’t come in? Is there a market-rate plan? Mohagen stated they have not considered that at this time. Miller stated that interest rates would have to remarkably change. Mohagen stated that unfortunately, market-rate projects are also becoming extremely difficult to execute. • Commissioner Mogen – What will the size of the units be? Miller stated the 1- bedroom units would be between 500 and 600 square feet, and the 2-bedroom units would be just over 900 square feet, which is consistent with another Buhl project in St. Paul. • Chair Wilson – Asked about the sidewalks and trails. How will that be different from where they are currently? Miller stated in regard to sidewalks and pedestrian paths, the biggest impact will be at Larpenteur and Fry where a lot of 150 pedestrians cross. There is a large amount of landscaping and breathing room in the proposed plan and narrow the existing curb cut for pedestrians to cross. Also, all along the parking stalls between the building and surface parking, there will be a sidewalk that extends the length of that. • Chair Wilson – Asked about snow removal. Will it be hauled off-site or will they be using some of the parking spaces proposed for snow storage? Miller stated a lot will either be shipped offsite or put into the stormwater area. Wilson asked if they can guarantee they won’t be covering a lot of parking spots for more than a couple of hours while waiting on it to be shipped out? Mohagen stated they could probably come to an agreement on the number of stalls. • Chair Wilson – Asked about plans for safety and the police calls, and to combat that to give some ease of mind to neighbors. Mohagen stated they take safety in their buildings very seriously and they do not tolerate crime. When first starting a building, they get a new group of people in and that will happen again for the new building. There is a process with Fair Housing to bring in new eligible tenants. A background check is completed and they do call previous landlords. Even with that, it doesn’t catch people that can create problems. If there is an incident, they are moving to evict immediately. Then they can either go through the process again, or they can get referrals from existing residents. He notes the current residents also want a safe place to live. They do not want crime and they are there to have a home that is affordable to them. The townhalls have been a great time for the community to talk to each other and identify problems. As they continue to operate the building, if there is a problem, they are looking to evict and then backfill with a tenant who won’t create problems. That has been a good process for them. He does believe anecdotally, the crime calls have gone down as they’ve operated for just about a year now. And he believes it’s an important distinction the density of the building and a lot of the calls are health and fire related. • Chair Wilson – Has a concern about the underground parking being charged for. He asked if what if they open it and they only have 20 people willing to pay, and then spots unutilized, and then we start having issues with people parking on neighboring roads such as Hollywood Court. Mohagen stated at that point, it’s not only a public issue it’s also an economic issue because they aren’t making money on the stalls and they’d reduce the price. Chair Wilson asked if they’d then be flexible on that, because he wants to make sure all stalls are utilized if they are going to be deviating from City Code parking requirements so much. Miller stated a lot of property management companies charge enough to only have 1-2 parking stalls available at a time, so it is a dynamic pricing. Mohagen stated it’s a mini supply and demand. Mohagen also stated he would talk to the property manager at Amber Union to let residents know where guests can park on site instead of neighboring roads. • Commissioner Mogen – Asked if there is every any agreement with the bank for financing that they have to charge a certain amount for parking? Mohagen stated it would be a part of the financial projections, but it would not lock them into that. If they do not achieve a certain part of those projections, they would not lose their financing. 151 • Commissioner Brooks – Mentioned the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and stated it mentions that when considering a PUD, a project should provide enough public benefit to justify the potential impacts. He asked Mohagen to speak to the public benefits of the project. Mohagen stated the major benefit to the public would be providing housing for people who cannot afford it. The need for affordable housing is usually the top thing brought up in comprehensive plans, and the need is very high across the Twin Cities. He stated often they have tenants move in, have a stable and affordable housing situation with kids, and then they are able to achieve economic mobility with the stability. From what he’s heard from folks involved with advocating for affordable housing, that is the goal. Someone is provided with stable, affordable housing and they are able to move up and out to provide that opportunity for someone else. He stated another benefit is the reduction in impervious surface on the lot. Right now the lot is a parking lot and that is not the highest and best use for the lot. There will be more green space. The Comprehensive Plan states shrinking impervious surface is a benefit to the community. He finally stated new community members to interact with existing community members, and to provide new dollars to local businesses. • Mayor Gustafson – What do you seen as the occupancy rate per dwelling unit? Mohagen stated it will be less than Amber Union because of the lack of 3- and 4- bedroom units. There are standards that the property manager follows in terms of Fair Housing, and there are multiple inspections from MHFA and HUD. He is not currently sure of the occupancy, but they will follow all guidelines proposed by the MHFA and HUD. • Commissioner Mogen thanked Mohagen and Miller for being very candid and straight-forward and willing to address the concerns and questions from commissioners and residents. Planning Commission Discussion: • Chair Wilson stated the Planning Commission will want to discuss now the proposal and the need for a PUD. • Commissioner Mogen began by stating he loves the plan, even with the parking. He believes it is perfect. It is the nice density needed. He stated that yes, it is a percent higher on impervious surface and 3’ higher on height, but even as variances those would probably pass. The only thing here is the very significant adjustment to the parking requirements. It is a legitimate concern. He also wants to recognize that as he talks about this project, it is not “these residents” that are going to be using it, but rather “our neighbors.” They are not “somebody else,” but instead people who live in our community. When talking about security and police calls, if they happen along his street, he is not concerned about it, but he is concerned about his neighbor getting a call to their house. He is not concerned about the number of cars coming and going. Any use of the property will have traffic. He too is concerned about his son pulling out of St. Mary’s Street, but it will not be because of a few more people pulling out of Amber Union and Amber Flats. Regarding the Comprehensive Plan and public benefits, the plan has a ton of benefits – more affordable housing, open space, green space, it’s improving walkability, it’s a better use than a parking lot, it provides new residents and 152 new tax base, new customers, etc. It is a not a drive-through and is better for the environment. It is a good use of the property. Even the trash issue was addressed. The only thing is the parking, and he is a little concerned about charging for parking which would narrow down the availability of parking, but he believes that has been addressed. They are motivated to have underground parking be fully sold. He is concerned about parking for surface parking, which would be like any dorm, and would not be utilized. He would like to make a condition that surface parking not be charged for, and that the trees along Larpenteur and Underwood on the plan remain part of the project as proposed. He also believes there should be a condition about snow storage on site, that they cannot store it in a parking area for more than 2-3 days. • Commissioner Tracy – Stated he is supportive of the project, but there is a second light needed. Chair Wilson stated it is a county road and is out of our control. Commissioner Tracy stated he is concerned, regardless, without an additional light there could be a problem. • Vice-Chair Paynter – Began by talking about the Larpenteur & Snelling Corridor Development Study and the timing of this proposal. He agrees that the timing is not ideal, however the developer has a right to apply for this project and it needs to be considered against the current zoning code. She stated this is a high- density, residentially-zoned property and this a good use of that land. The variances being requested are minor, aside from the parking, and she believes if the developer believes if it is enough parking, it probably is. Younger people don’t have as many cars as the older generation, and the trends in urban development are toward less parking. Many cities are eliminating parking requirements all together, so this is a very appropriate use. • Commissioner Seifert – Stated this is his first meeting with the Planning Commission. He does believe the parking is a concern, but he does believe from everything he has seen, cities are requiring less parking and that is the trend. He is glad a lot of the concerns were addressed, such as with the trash, and he also seconds that the parking volume is lowered and should not be utilized for snow. He is also concerned about the parking being charged for. • Commissioner Anderson – Stated that he echoes the thoughts of the other Commissioners. He thinks it is a perfect plan for that current parking lot, and thinking about PUDs, he goes back and forth on the concept of them as sometimes they don’t make a lot of sense, but this time it does make sense. He also states the Comprehensive Plan is very clear that affordable housing is the point of a PUD. He is glad the concerns were addressed and the City needs to be vigilant moving forward and making sure the tree canopy is maintained and the trash is monitored. • Commissioner Brooks – He agrees with the other Commissioners as well, but he is also still concerned about parking. The property is zoned R-5M and just making a few changes, the property would go through without it even coming to the Planning Commission. • Commissioner Mogen – Stated he wanted to add one more condition to the PUD, that the open space cannot be converted into parking. • Chair Wilson – Asked Staff Liaison Lynch how to move forward with contingencies to the PUD. Lynch stated generally a PUD is written up to state 153 that it will go by the plans that are given to us, and generally there is a 5% variance written into that in case of necessary dimensional changes. If the plan is showing open space as open space, they would have to build according to that, and if they ever wanted to change that, they would have to go back through this process. Regarding the concern about paying for surface-level parking, she stated she would have to consult with the city attorney for advice on if that can be written into the PUD or not. She also stated this is a recommendation to City Council and we can include these items as what the Planning Commission believes should be included. • Chair Wilson – Thanked Buhl for listening to the resident concerns about the drive-through and coming back with a plan that worked better for the City. Wilson stated as a side-note to Chuck Long, that the Larpenteur & Snelling Corridor Development Study has been started and one community meeting has been held. He invited everyone to attend these meetings to provide their thoughts and feedback on the future of the City. It will be a longer study, and we are looking at how much more density we want in the City, and it will most likely not lead to the City wanting less density along the A-Line. He believes that is probably one thing they are confident in saying, that density is wanted there according to the Comprehensive Plan and will likely come out of the study as well. He believes waiting a year for this would be a problem, and they would end up with a similar plan. Wilson continued by stating regarding the parking, he was the only current Commissioner sitting when Amber Union came through, and it was approved at 1.09 parking spaces per unit which was well below the 2 spaces per unit required. He was very concerned at the time, but he can attest to the fact that the parking lot is usually very empty. He thinks the mass transit helps, and Minneapolis just approved a building with no parking spots. We are a first-ring suburban city, but we do still need to think about the underground parking to make sure it is utilized. • Vice-Chair Paynter – Asked the developer if there are any plans for charging stations. Mohagen stated they do exist and are used at Amber Union, and they would be happy to include them on this project. He does know that many tenants at Amber Union also do use the A-Line and Route 61. Paynter recommends they add a condition about charging stations for EVs. • Chair Wilson asked Staff Liaison Lynch about the next steps. Lynch stated the conditions the Planning Commission is proposing which include: free surface parking, maintaining the trees on the plan along Larpenteur and Underwood, snow storage not in a parking area for more than a couple of days until it’s taken off-site, open space cannot be converted into parking, and charging stations for EVs on site. She stated if the Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to City Council for approval of the PUD with those conditions, she would write up a draft PUD for the city attorney to review, then it would go to City Council to review and discuss and vote on. Vice-Chair Paynter added a condition about lighting, that all sides of the building and parking areas are lit. • Chair Wilson asked Staff Liaison Lynch to go over the next steps for the audience. Lynch stated it would go before City Council at a future meeting and they would vote on it. It would not be another public hearing unless Council decided to do that. Mayor Gustafson reminded the Commission that the Fire 154 Marshal, City Engineer, and Ramsey County are also still reviewing the plans. Lynch stated yes, and as part of the recommendation, any notes from those parties would also need to be addressed by the developer. They are generally technical requirements that would not change the overall design of the property, but we would require them to be addressed. Chair Wilson called for a motion for a recommendation of approval or disapproval of the Amber Flats PUD to City Council with the conditions outlined previously and subject to addressing comments from the Fire Marshal, City Engineer, and Ramsey County, and including a 5% variance from plans as approved by the City Administrator. Commissioner Mogen made a motion for approval as outlined above, seconded by Commissioner Paynter. A vote was made and the motion passed 6-1, with Commissioner Brooks in opposition. G. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Staff Liaison Report Staff Liaison Lynch noted the Larpenteur & Snelling Corridor Development Study is ongoing and there are cards available with QR codes to a survey and an interactive map online for residents to add comments. She welcomed everyone to get involved and they would be including the links online and in the weekly newsletter. She stated when the next community meeting is scheduled, they would be getting it out to everyone as well. 2. Council Liaison Report Mayor Gustafson stated the next City Council meeting would be the following night, Wednesday, October 25 at 7 PM. H. ADJOURN Commissioner Brooks made a motion to adjourn, motion was carried by consent. Meeting was adjourned at 9:04 PM. 155 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA IN RE: Application of Buhl Larpenteur West LLC, 5100 Eden Avenue, Suite 317, Edina, MN 55436, for Amber Flats Planned Unit Development FINDINGS OF FACT at Ramsey County Property IDs 212923110029 and 212923110028, Falcon Heights, MN 55113. On October 24, 2023, the Falcon Heights Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Buhl Larpenteur West, LLC, 5100 Eden Avenue, Suite 317, Edina, MN 55436 for Amber Flats PUD, to be located on the vacant lots otherwise known as Ramsey County Property IDs 212923110029 and 212923110028. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) preceded by published and mailed notice. The applicant was present, and the Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak. The Falcon Heights City Council now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The subject property consists of two parcels, Ramsey County Tax Parcel IDs 212923110029 and 212923110028, located at the southwest corner of Larpenteur Avenue and Snelling Avenue in Falcon Heights, MN and legally described as follows: PID 212923110029: The East 250 feet of the North 500 feet except the West 150 feet of the East 160 feet of the North 283 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 21, Township 29, Range 23, West of the Fourth Principal Meridian. 156 PID 212923110038: The West 150 feet of the East 160 feet of the North 283 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 21, Township 29, Range 23, West of the Fourth Principal Meridian; (“Subject Property”) 2. The Subject Property is currently zoned R-5M, High Density Residential Mixed Use. 3. In October 2023, an application was received for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a multifamily apartment complex consisting of 100-units to be located in the two vacant lots directly to the west of the existing Amber Union Apartments. According to a review of the plans, the need for a PUD is due to the flexibility from City Code guidelines that would be required. There are three areas where deviations from City Code would be needed. 4. The Falcon Heights Planning Commission finds this project meets all guidelines in City Code, except for guidelines around height, impervious surface, and parking. (a) According to section 113-243, the maximum height of a building is four stories or 40 feet, whichever is less. This project comes in at approximately 43’ in height. (b) According to section 113-+241, the maximum impervious surface coverage amount for this site is 75 percent of the lot area. This project will have approximately 76 percent impervious surface. (c) According to Section 113-310, multiple-family dwellings must have at least two parking spaces per dwelling unit, with at least 80 percent of the required parking to be located below grade and integrated into the apartment building. At these amounts, Amber Flats would be required to have 200 parking spaces, with 160 of 157 those located below grade. This project is proposing 114 parking spaces total, with 63 of those located below grade. 5. The City of Falcon Heights Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting on October 24, 2023 to conduct a public hearing and issue a recommendation on the requested PUD. The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to recommend approval of the PUD request. 6. A PUD may be permitted in the legislative discretion of the city council. The Planning Commission and City Council must consider the following general requirements and standards identified in Section 113-201 in rezoning property to PUD: a. A PUD must be consistent with the city comprehensive plan and the intent and purpose of the City Code provisions relative to land use, subdivision and development. Finding: The City Council finds the application and submitted plans to be consistent with the city comprehensive plan. The proposal provides a public benefit to the city in the means of new residents, a larger tax-base, and more affordable housing (City of Falcon Heights – 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter II, Chapter VIII). b. Whenever joint common open space or service facilities for individual owners or users are provided within the PUD, the PUD plan shall provide reasonable assurance of adequate operation and maintenance of such open space and service facilities. Finding: The project will provide shared open space and facilities to occupants of the apartment building. Based on testimony from Buhl Larpenteur West, LLC, these facilities will be adequately maintained and operated by a property management 158 company, the City Council finds that reasonable assurance has been provided of adequate operation and maintenance of such open space and service facilities is provided. c. When a PUD provides for common or public open space, the total area of common or public open space or security in any stage of development, shall, at a minimum, bear the same relationship to the total open space to be provided in the entire PUD as the stages or units completed or under development bear to the entire PUD. Finding: The City Council finds this requirement to not be applicable. The full PUD will be completed during one stage. d. Whenever any PUD is to be completed in stages, no such stage shall, when averaged with all previously completed stages, have a residential density that exceeds 125 percent of the proposed residential density of the entire PUD. Finding: The City Council finds this requirement to not be applicable. The full PUD will be completed during one stage. e. All development shall be carefully phased so as to ensure that it will not cause an unreasonable burden upon the city in providing services and utilities or cause a deleterious impact upon the natural environment. Finding: The City Council finds the proposed PUD will be constructed in one phase and will not place an unreasonable burden upon the city in providing services and utilities or cause a deleterious impact upon the natural environment. 159 DECISION: The Falcon Heights City Council hereby approves the Applicant’s request for a Planned Unit Development, subject to the following conditions: (a) Trees shall be planted and/or maintained along Larpenteur Avenue and Underwood Street as shown in plans submitted by UrbanWorks, dated 10/16/2023. (b) Snow storage may not be stored in any parking area for more than 48 hours. (c) Open space as shown on plans submitted by UrbanWorks, dated, 10/16/2023, may not be converted into additional parking. (d) Charging stations for not less than four electric vehicles must be provided on site. (e) Developer shall comply with all recommendations from Ramsey County, City Engineer, and Fire Marshal. ADOPTED this ______ day of ____________, 2023, by the City Council of Falcon Heights, Minnesota. CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS BY: ______________________________ Randall C. Gustafson, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Jack Linehan, City Administrator 160 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 23-08 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 113 OF THE FALCON HEIGHTS CITY CODE REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R-5M TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF FALCON HEIGHTS ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Chapter 113 of the Falcon Heights City Code is hereby amended to add a new Section 113-212 to read as follows. Section 113-212 – Amber Flats Planned Unit Development (a) Legal description. The legal description of this PUD is as follows: PID 212923110029: The East 250 feet of the North 500 feet except the West 150 feet of the East 160 feet of the North 283 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 21, Township 29, Range 23, West of the Fourth Principal Meridian. PID 212923110038: The West 150 feet of the East 160 feet of the North 283 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 21, Township 29, Range 23, West of the Fourth Principal Meridian; (“Subject Property”) (b) Purpose. The purpose of the Amber Flats Planned Unit Development is to provide for multi-family apartments. (c) Permitted uses and zoning regulations. The R-5M mixed use high density residential district regulations shall apply to the property subject to the following modifications: a. Permitted uses: 1. One principal structure consisting of 117,000 square feet and 100 apartment units. 2. No conditional uses. 3. No interim uses. 4. Setbacks as depicted in the Architectural Site Plan dated October 16, 2023 prepared by UrbanWorks Architecture, LLC. 161 b. Parking. Vehicle parking shall be as follows: 1. 51 surface parking stalls as depicted in the Architectural Site Plan dated October 16, 2023 prepared by UrbanWorks Architecture, LLC. 2. 63 sublevel parking stalls as depicted in the Sublevel 1- Overall Plan dated October 16, 2023 prepared by UrbanWorks Architecture, LLC. (d) Development plan. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plan, which is on file with the city and which is incorporated herein by reference. (1) The following plans prepared by UrbanWorks Architecture, LLC with up to five percent variance as approved by the city administrator: a. Site development plans, dated October 16, 2023, prepared by UrbanWorks Architecture, LLC including: 1. Site demolition plan. 2. Erosion and sediment control plan. 3. Site dimension plan. 4. Grading and drainage plan. 5. Utility plan. 6. Architectural site plan, including overall, sublevel 1, level 1, level 2 7. Building elevations. (e) Additional conditions. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following additional conditions. (1) Trees shall be planted and/or maintained along Larpenteur Avenue and Underwood Street as shown in plans submitted by UrbanWorks, dated 10/16/2023. (2) Snow storage may not be stored in any parking area for more than 48 hours. (3) Open space as shown on plans submitted by UrbanWorks, dated, 10/16/2023, may not be converted into additional parking. (4) Charging stations for not less than four electric vehicles must be provided on site. SECTION 2. Zoning Map. The zoning map of the City of Falcon Heights shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. 162 SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED this ______ day of ____________, 2023, by the City Council of Falcon Heights, Minnesota. CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS BY: ______________________________ Randall C. Gustafson, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Jack Linehan, City Administrator 163 SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 23-08 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 113 OF THE FALCON HEIGHTS CITY CODE REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R-5M TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.191, in the case of a lengthy ordinance, a summary may be published. While a copy of the entire ordinance is available without cost at the office of the City Clerk, the following summary is approved by the City Council and shall be published in lieu of publishing the entire ordinance: The purpose of this ordinance is to amend Chapter 113 of City Code to rezone property from R-5M to PUD, Planned Unit Development, to allow for the development of a 100- unit affordable housing apartment building. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage. APPROVED for publication by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota this ______ day of ____________, 2023. CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS BY: ________________________________ Randall C. Gustafson, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________________ Jack Linehan, City Administrator 164 BLANK PAGE  165 Item Amendment to Administrative Manual Regarding Guidelines for Snow and Ice Control and Pathway / Sidewalk Maintenance Map Description The Administrative Manual Regarding Guidelines for Snow and Ice Control was last updated in September 2022 to include Lauderdale as part of the plowing responsibilities of the City. At, that time, additional sidewalks and pathways were referenced on the map but no determinations were made for areas within the 2023 Pavement Management Project until construction was completed and for commercial properties along Snelling/Larpenteur. The City Council must now make determinations for snow removal guidelines for the Garden Avenue sidewalk, Ruggles Pathway and commercial properties so updates can then be made to our Snow and Ice Control policy of the Administrative Manual and Pathway / Sidewalk Maintenance Map to include these areas. Budget Impact N/A Attachment(s) •Amended policy •Pathway / Sidewalk Maintenance Map Action(s) Requested Staff recommend determining maintenance of pathways / sidewalks post 2023 PMP Management Project and approving the amended policy and proposed map. Meeting Date November 15, 2023 Agenda Item Policy H2 Attachment Amended Policy; Sidewalk Map Submitted By Jack Linehan, City Administrator 166 Page 1 of 5 Administrative Manual Section VII D. GUIDELINES FOR SNOW AND ICE CONTROL 1. Introduction The City of Falcon Heights believes that it is in the best interest of the public for the city to assume basic responsibility for control of snow and ice on city streets. Reasonable ice and snow control is necessary for routine travel and emergency services. The city will provide this in a safe and cost effective manner, keeping in mind safety, budget, personnel and environmental concerns. City crews remove snow on local streets, streets designated by contract within the City of Lauderdale, some public pathways, designated city parking lots at City Hall, Community Park and Curtiss Field, and ice rinks. 2. Commencement of Operations The city’s Public Works Director will decide when to begin snow or ice control operations on city streets. The criteria for that decision are: a. Accumulation of 2 inches or more, with continual snowfall, warrants commencement of plowing operations; b. Drifting of snow may warrant partial or full operations depending on conditions; c. Icing of pavements may warrant partial or full sanding operation depending on conditions; d. Time of snowfall in relationship to anticipated level of use of streets. Snow and ice control operations are expensive due to personnel and equipment costs. Consequently, street snowplowing operations will not generally be conducted for snowfalls of less than 2 inches. 3. Procedures Snow will be plowed in a manner so as to minimize any traffic obstructions. The snow shall be pushed from left to right. The discharge shall go onto the boulevard area of the right-of-way without regard for driveways or sidewalks. It is the city’s goal to have the entire street system cleared after a “typical” snowfall in approximately 5 hours. Depending on snowfall conditions, duration of the storm, equipment and personnel, cleanup operations can fluctuate. 167 Page 2 of 5 One of the most frequent and most irritable problems in removal of snow from the public streets is the snow deposited in driveways during plowing operations. Snow being accumulated on the plow blade has no place to go but in the driveway. It is not possible to comply with special requests or conduct special maneuvers in attempt to minimize snow in driveways. 4. Priorities and Schedules a. Street snowplowing The city has designated Prior Ave. (off of Larpenteur Ave.) and Garden Ave. (Hamline to Snelling Aves.) as top priorities. This classification is based on need to provide access for emergency vehicle fire and medical services and for access to the elementary school. Clearing of these streets is followed by the following neighborhoods subject to weather conditions, weather forecasts, equipment, and availability of crews. Typical routes if equipment and crews are available: East Plow West Plow 1. Northome 1. University Grove 2. Northeast 2. Falcon Woods 3. Snelling West 3. Lindig/Tatum 4. Hollywood Court 4. Lauderdale b. City Hall parking lot Clearing of snow from the city hall parking lot will be the first priority of the work week day for the Parks/Public Works staff. Evening and weekend snow removal will be done at the discretion of the Public Works Director based on scheduled meetings and facility rentals. c. Public pathways There are approximately 6 miles of paved public pathways for commuter and recreational pedestrian use. The city will plow all trails and sidewalks that abut city property and parks as conditions permit, as well as the areas indicated on the map in Appendix A. Conditions that challenge the crews ability to clear snow include: 1) recurring snowfalls resulting in snow accumulation; 2) drifting; 3) limited space for snow storage and 4) availability and condition of the equipment. Pathway clearing is conducted by the Parks/Public Works staff between 8:00 am and 4:00 pm. A map of sidewalks and trails in included as Appendix A to these guidelines. 168 Page 3 of 5 d. Ice Skating Rinks Ice rinks are maintained for the recreational pleasure of the community. Given the high level of community use of the rinks outside of the traditional workday and workweek, rinks are kept free of snow and open for use during these times. Removal of snow from the ice rinks will be done at the discretion of the Public Works Director. Generally, if a “weekend” snowfall should occur and cease prior to noon Sunday, an attempt will be made to clear the rinks and make them available for the weekend. Generally, if a “weekday” snowfall ceases prior to 4:00 p.m., an attempt will be made to make the rinks available for the evening. Consideration of the following factors will be given in the scheduling of ice rink snow removal: condition of pathways (passable), current weather conditions and forces (favorable for skating). 5. Use of Sand and Salt The city limits the use of sand and salt because it can have adverse effect on the environment. Application is limited to steep grades, curves and intersections and is not intended to provide for widespread bare pavement during winter conditions. The city is not responsible for damage to grass caused by the sand/salt mixture and therefore will not make repairs or compensate residents for salt damage to turf areas in the right-of-way. 6. Property Damage Snowplowing and ice control operations can cause property damage even under the best of circumstances and care on the part of the operators. The most common types of damage are to improvements in the right-of-way which extends about 10 to 15 feet beyond the curb. The intent of the right-of-way is to provide room for snow storage, utilities, sidewalks and other city uses. The city will assume no liability for personal property that is stored in the right-of-way. Damage to fences, trees or other structures will be repaired or replaced by the city if they are on private property and if the damage could have been avoided. Turf that is scraped or gouged by plow equipment will be repaired by top dressing and seeding the following spring if the damage could be avoided. Residents are requested to assist by watering the areas that are repaired. The city will assume liability for mailboxes damaged during plowing, if it is determined that the plow made direct contact with a mailbox. If a mailbox is damaged due to indirect contact, including the force of snow, the city assumes no responsibility. Final cleaning adjacent to mailboxes is the responsibility of each property owner. 7. Fire Hydrants Each of the 150 or so fire hydrants scattered throughout the city are equipped with a marker for the purpose of providing increased visibility during the winter season. In addition, the city will encourage residents to keep hydrants clear of snow. Hydrants at 169 Page 4 of 5 major intersections and covered by heavy snow from plows will be kept accessible as needed and as feasible with city crews and equipment. 8. Parking Restrictions Providing quality snow removal on city streets requires the street to be free of vehicles or other obstacles. Vehicles left parked on the street for extended periods of time created significant operational problems for snowplow operators as well as safety problems due to packed snow and ice remaining on the roadway around the vehicle. Parking on city streets is not allowed after a 2 inch accumulation of snow. Vehicles must remain off the streets for up to 48 hours or until a street have been plowed full-width, whichever comes first. In the instance that streets have been plowed but an additional 2 inches or more of snowfall occurs, vehicles must remain off the street (see City Code Section 46-28). Any vehicle parked in violation of the City Code is subject to a parking citation and is also declared to be a public nuisance. This nuisance may be abated by removing and towing away vehicles under the direction of the City’s contracted police agency. Ramsey County Sheriff’s Department. From November 15 to April 1, residents may park one passenger vehicle on the unsurfaced portion of their front yard. This provision only applies to properties with a single-width driveway. The vehicle must be parked parallel to the driveway (see City Code Section 113-310). 9. Responsibility of Property Owners Residents and/or their contracted snow removal company must keep all snow on the private property. It is a public nuisance to shovel or plow snow into or across the streets or alleys. Clearing of alleyways is the responsibility of property owners adjacent to the alley. The alley must be cleared within 24 hours after snowfall has ended. Residents are encouraged to manage the alley with one contractor so as to have a uniform plowing. Some sidewalks in the city must be cleared by the adjacent property owners (see Appendix A). Public sidewalks must be cleared of snow and ice within 24 hours after a storm has ended. Failure to do so is a public nuisance. City staff will monitor the sidewalks and will leave door hangers to remind residents of the sidewalk snow removal regulations. Sidewalks that are not cleared in the appropriate timeframe may be cleared by city staff or a contracted party. The cost of abatement will be billed to the property owner (see City Code Section 22-48). In only the most extreme instances will City staff provide a courtesy plow of sidewalks that are not usually maintained by the City. If snow removal occurs during a day of trash collection, receptacles awaiting pickup should be set back at least two feet behind the curb line, not in the street. 170 Page 5 of 5 10. Information and Comments Comments and complaints will be taken during normal working hours at city hall. Complaints that warrant a short term response will typically be responded to within 24 hours of receiving the complaint, whenever feasible to do so. Policy amended by City Council on September 14, 2022November 2023 171 Pathway / Sidewalk Maintenance Map Updated November 2023 172 BLANK PAGE  173 Item Authorizing the City Administrator to Execute Grant Applications on the City’s Behalf Description Whenever possible, city staff look for grant funds available to aid in various City projects, requesting the City Council’s prior approval in order to submit the grant application. However, at times, staff are made aware of grants with very little time given to apply, let alone seek prior approval to apply. Rather than time constraints hindering staff from submitting a grant application altogether, Staff requests Council’s approval to allow the City Administrator to apply for grant funds when necessary, making sure to inform Council of any grant funds applied for at the earliest convenience. This is a common practice in neighboring cities. Furthermore, if the City would be selected to receive grant funds, the City Council would still retain the right to approve /not approve the receipt of any such grant funds at that time. This approval will be beneficial with the upcoming Community Park rebuild. The city hopes to apply for dozens of various grants ranging in size and probability of award. Budget Impact N/A Attachment(s) • Resolution 23-75 Authorizing the City Administrator to Execute Grant Applications on the City’s Behalf Action(s) Requested Staff recommend approval of resolution in support of authorizing the City Administrator to execute grant fund application. Meeting Date November 15, 2023 Agenda Item Policy H3 Attachment Resolution 23-75 Submitted By Jack Linehan, City Administrator 174 - CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS COUNCIL RESOLUTION November 15, 2023 No. 23-75 - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE CERTAINGRANT APPLICATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS WHEREAS, the City of Falcon Heights has applied for a variety of grants which benefit the City; and WHEREAS, the Falcon Heights City Council encourages staff to continue to identify and apply for grants as a means to fund the policies, priorities and programs of the City, as established by actions of the Council; and WHEREAS, grant submittals sometimes require verification of authority to apply on behalf of the City, and the required timeframes for submittal sometimes may not allow for Council authorization prior to application deadlines; and WHEREAS, the Falcon Heights City Council may still elect not to accept grant funds if the City Administrator has applied for and receives any that they do not approve of during Council action; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota: 1. That the City Administrator is authorized to execute grant applications on behalf of the City of Falcon Heights in cases where Council authorization cannot be practically obtained prior to an application deadline, and where any matching funds or other city financial obligation related to the grant are accounted for either in the City budget or by previous Council action; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Administrator will report any such grant applications to the City Council after the application is submitted. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moved by: Approved by: ________________________ Randall C. Gustafson Mayor GUSTAFSON ____ In Favor Attested by: ________________________ LEEHY Jack Linehan MEYER ____ Against City Administrator WEHYEE WASSENBERG 175 BLANK PAGE  176 Item Law Enforcement Contract Discussion Description A discussion of the latest updates on the proposed police services options with the City of St. Paul. Budget Impact N/A Attachment(s) N/A Action(s) Requested Staff recommends the City Council discuss the contract options with the City of St. Paul for policing services. Meeting Date November 15, 2023 Agenda Item Policy H4 Attachment N/A Submitted By Jack Linehan, City Administrator 177