Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPCMin_94Oct24MINUTES REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 24, 1994 PRESENT ABSENT ALSO PRESENT Tom Brace Wendy Treadwell Susan Hoyt, City Administrator Paul Kuettel Carla Asleson, Planner Lee Barry Sam Jacobs, Council Liaison Lisa Lampi Kay Andrews Ken Salzberg Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Chair Lee Barry. Minutes of September 26, 1994 were approved as written. PLAN REVIEW OF AN ESSENTIAL SVENIUE STRUCTURE AT HARVEST STATES COOPERATIVES, 1667 SNELLING A Carla Asleson, city planner, summarized Harvest States' request to install a water cooling system for their corporate headquarters at 1667 Snelling Avenue. She said that a water cooling tower is proposed to be located behind the Snelling Avenue side of the building set back 40' from the building and approximately 75' from the south lot line. It will be about 19' in height. These measurements are in compliance with the setback and height regulations of the B-3 zoning district. Mark Whims, the contractor for Harvest States, was introduced. He explained that the purpose of the tower is to remove hear from the water in the cooling system which is then dissipated into the atmosphere and then channel the water to operate an air conditioning system. This cooling system will replace the existing once- through well water system that is presently being utilized. He said that the State Department of Natural Resources is requiring that all users of once-through well water systems convert to a water efficient alternative. Mr. Whims said that the noise level would be below the required decibel level. A low volume motor will be used during the summer only and the system will be shut down and drained in the fall. Asleson said that the building official had reviewed the submitted plans and found them to be in conformance with the Minnesota Uniform Building Code. Commissioner Salzberg moved to recommend approval of the plans for the following reasons: • The tower is in conformance with zoning code regulations for height and • setbacks; • • The height of the tower is reasonable, particularly when compared to the height of the main building. The tower's total height, including the handrail, is 10'. The zoning code allows buildings to be built as high as 35'; • The tower will not impact adjacent residential properties by blocking the view of nearby streets of properties. The tower will be set back approximately 75' from the Hollywood Court properties. The zoning code requires only a 40' setback when a commercial parcel abuts residential property; • The neutral color of the tower will blend with the existing office building; and • The tower, whether in its present design or another, must be built to conform with state regulations. Motion seconded by Commissioner Brace and passed unanimously. REPORT ON THE PARKING SITUATION ON TATUM STREET Administrator Hoyt briefed the commission on a request from Mr. Fedir Chrun of 1794 Tatum Street. Mr. Chrun has requested that the planning commission and • city council study the parking situation on Tatum Street. Mr. Chrun's letter of request states that since part of Tatum Street is not regulated with respect to parking, individuals are parking their cars there all day long. Mr. Chrun claims that this narrows the amount of space for cars driving down the street. Also, because Tatum Street has no sidewalks, people walking on the street must be very careful when walking in the street, especially when the speed limit of 30 miles per hour is being ignored. Mr. Chrun wrote that he would like to recommend that parking be limited to two hours per day everywhere on Tatum with parking permits issued to residents. Planner Asleson described the situation on Tatum Street as observed by city staff. An average of eleven cars are using Tatum Street as a long-term, daytime parking arrangement each day. A search of license plate numbers shows that the overwhelming majority of the parkers are non-Tatum Street residents. The parkers are primarily using the non-restricted portions of Tatum rather than the two-hour zones. Administrator Hoyt outlined several alternatives that the commission could eventually consider for Tatum and/or Lindig Streets: • Determine that the situation does not warrant further restrictions. • Expand the daytime, two hour parking restrictions to both sides of Tatum • and/or Lindig Streets. • Notify residents that the option of residential permit parking if 75% of property owners in the area will agree to the arrangement. A petition from several neighbors of Mr. Chrun was received by city staff earlier in the day. The petition asks that the planning commission delay any action on the Tatum matter for another month. Asleson noted that staff was not requesting that any action be taken at this time, but would like direction from the commission as to their next step in the process. After a lengthy discussion, the commission determined that they would like to get input from Tatum and Lindig Street residents regarding the parking issue before making any recommendation. The commission directed staff to notify residents of these two streets that the issue would be discussed at the November 28, 1994 meeting. Meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Carla Asleson, City Planner • Dee Swenson Recording Secretary