HomeMy WebLinkAboutPCAgenda_95Nov27•
y.
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
November 27, 1995
7 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Tom Brace _ Lee Barry _ Alex Hanschen _ Paul Kuettel _
Wendy Treadwell _ Betty Wilcox - Ken Salzberg _
Sue Gehrz _ Wayne Groff
7. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
September 25, 1995
3. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
November 8, 1995 (Draft)
4. Update on the comprehensive planning study of the Community Business
District/southeast corner of Snelling and Larpenteur
5. Information on Livable Communities Act
6. Land use comparisons for the metropolitan area
7. Review of proposed amendments to the zoning code
8. Update on meeting schedule for December, 1995
9. Adjourn
MINUTES
REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
(• September 25, 1995
7:00 p.m.
PRESENT ABSENT ALSO PRESENT
Lee Barry Betty Wilcox Susan Hoyt, Administrator
Wayne Groff Carla Asleson, Planner
Alex Wanschen
Pavl• Kuettel
Wendy Treadwell
Tom Bi`ace (7:09 p.m.)
Chair Barry called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of the June 26, 1995 meeting were approved as presented. There were no planning
commission meetings held in July or August.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Administrator Hoyt reviewed the city council minutes with the planning commission, noting
• that the city will be working with Falcon Heights Elementary to develop better park facilities
for the northeast quadrant of the city.
INTRODUCTION OF NEW PLANNING COMMISSIONER
The newest planning commissioner, Wayne Groff, was introduced to the other commissioners.
REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CHAPTER 9-2 06 OF THE ZONING CODE FOR ADDITIONAL
FENCE HEIGHT AT 1710 ST. MARY'S STREET
Planner Asleson explained that Dale Huff and Linda Fite of 1710 St. Mary's Street are
requesting a variance to construct an eight foot high privacy fence along their rear property
line. Without a variance, the zoning code allows fences up to six feet in height, which is a
reasonable. regulation for most properties in the city. The Huff/Fite property, however, is
unique in that it abuts a commercial property/alley that is used for the loading of appliances
and for refuse disposal. An adequate screen between the residential and commercial zones
is therefore desired. The applicants have cited noise and visual unattractiveness of the
commercial property as their hardship statements. The fence would run only along the rear
line of the property and not along the northern or southern side lot lines.
Letters were mailed to property owners abutting 1710 St. Mary's Street, explaining this
request. Staff received a call expressing support for the variance from Marianne McNulty,
1700 St. Mary's Street. Ms. McNulty received a similar variance for her property in 1992 for
reasons similar to those cited by Mr. Huff and Ms. Fite.
• Commissioner Kuettel asked the applicants about the design of their fence. Mr. Huff explained
that the fence would be of the same design as their neighbor to the south (1700 St. Mary's).
. .
A motion was made by Commissioner Treadwell to approve the resolution recommending
approval of the variance to the city council. Seconded by Commissioner Hanschen and
('. unanimously approved.
REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CHAPTER 9-13.04 OF THE ZONING CODE TO PERMIT TWO
ACCESS DRIVES TO THE PROPERTY AT 1386 W. IDAHO AVENUE
Administrator Hoyt reported that Michael Zalk and Sissel Ilstad of 1386 W. Idaho Avenue have
requested a variance to permit two access drives to the double, tandem garage that they
propose to build on their property. Other than the dual access issue, the proposed garage
meets all other conditions of the zoning code.
The requested variance would allow the applicants to access their garage from both the street
and from the alley (the property currently has street access to the existing single car garage).
The new, double car garage could be built in a standard configuration with driveway access
only from the street or only from the alley. This type of configuration would require much
more paving and would reduce the amount of open space in the rear yard.
Staff's review of this proposal included an analysis of whether this property is unique. The
property in question is one of six properties in the city that has a detached garage entirely in
its rear yard with access from the street rather than from the alley (there are an estimated 220
homes on interior lots with alley access to the garage). Therefore, this property is uniquely
situated because it does not have alley access for its detached garage in a neighborhood
whose urban design standards are developed around the concept of rear access to accessory
structures. These design standards are meant to maintain front yard landscaping along the
f street. From that design standpoint, this property should be using alley access rather than
driveway access. However, the driveway to the street was put into place many years ago and
the applicants should not be denied the right to use the alley access that was intended for
their property. The alley design of this neighborhood also reflects the intent of the current
zoning code to maintain open spaces in residential areas, especially in rear yards. This
particular garage configuration does maximize open space and prevents the need to remove
a mature birch tree in the rear yard.
Property owners abutting the subject property were notified about the proposed garage but
did not contact staff with comments.
Hoyt stated that the planning commission had two alternatives:
• Deny the variance request because there is not a demonstrated hardship nor unique
characteristic on this property that justifies approving a variance for more efficient
access to the proposed garage; or
• Approve the variance request because: a) the property is uniquely situated as one of
six properties that has a detached garage entirely in the rear yard with access from the
street rather than the alley; b) the property is unique because it has the opportunity to
utilize rear alley access to a rear yard accessory structure, which is what the-alley was
designed for; c) the proposal is consistent with the intent of the zoning code because
it maximizes greenspace in the property's rear yard and protects the property's current
configuration of open space and vegetation; and d) the proposal is consistent with the
i . intent of the original neighborhood design by utilizing alley access to a detached
accessory structure in the rear yard with a driveway of no more than six feet in length,
similar to other drives off of alleys in the neighborhood.
Hoyt stated that staff recommends approval of the variance with two conditions: 1) that the
garage remain in its proposed configuration in the rear 46 feet (38%) of the property and 2)
• that the driveway to the street be removed if there is no longer direct vehicle access from the
street into the garage. She also noted that staff would not likely have recommended approval
if the proposal had been to add street access to a garage that already had alley access,
because street access should be discouraged whenever it is not already existing. Also, staff
would not likely have recommend approval of a variance to add alley access to an existing
attached garage with street access because this would involve adding another long driveway
to the rear of the property which would be inconsistent with the goal of maintaining
greenspace unless the property conditions were very unique.
.~~
Michael Zalk, property owner, stated that he had no objections to the conditions on the
variance proposed by staff. He also stated that he has explained his plans to his neighbors
and they have voiced no objections. Furthermore, he stated that when the garage is built, it
may be a bit smaller than the 15' x 40' garage shown on his application. It is his intent to
keep the structure as small as possible while still being functional.
Commissioner Brace asked about the proposed garage's setback from the alley. Administrator
Hoyt responded that since the garage door would be parallel to the alley, a five foot setback
is required to allow for vehicles to turn into the building. The Zalk/Ilstad proposal shows a six
foot setback. Mr. Zalk commented that although he would have preferred a greater setback,
he wanted to minimize the amount of paved. and built space on his property.
Commissioner Brace then asked for clarification on staff's recommendation to require removal
of the existing driveway to the street. Administrator Hoyt explained that if a property owner
• were to connect the proposed garage to the existing house and could not access the garage
from the street, the driveway would have to be removed. The rationale for this decision is
that if the driveway is not going to be used for garage access, it should be turned into
greenspace to make the property consistent with others in the neighborhood.
Motion was made by Commissioner Kuettel to approve the resolution recommending approval
of the variance to the city council with the conditions as noted by staff. Seconded by
Commissioner Brace and unanimously approved.
REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS RELATED TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
SNELLING AND LARPENTEUR AVENUE
Administrator Hoyt told the commission that the city had hired a consultant to analyze the
potential future uses of the southeast corner and make recommendations as to the future use
of this property on topics such as design guidelines and how to make the property blend in
with neighboring properties. The commission will be appraised of the consultant's
recommendations in the coming months.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
Carla Asleson, Planner and Recording Secretary
'' •
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING ~ `
MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 8, 1995 ~~ ;rte
~~ ~
Mayor Baldwin convened the meeting at 7:03 p.m.
PRESENT
Baldwin, Gehrz, Gibson Talbot, Hustad, and Jacobs. Also present were Hoyt, Asleson,
and Maurer.
COMMUNITY FORUM
There was no one wishing to take advantage of the community forum.
MINUTES OF OCTOBER 25, 1995
Minutes were approved by unanimous consent.
CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED
Motion was made by Councilmember Jacobs to approve the consent agenda. Motion
passed unanimously.
1. Disbursements
2. Licenses
3. Scheduling of public hearing on delinquent utility payments
4. Payment for Falcon Heights School playground improvements
5. Cancellation of December 6 and December 27 meetings and scheduling of
December 20, 1995 meeting
6. Request for use of Community Park shelter as a site for the Lions' Club holiday tree
sale
POLICY AGENDA
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 95-29 CERTIFYING THE CITY RETURNS OF
NOVEMBER 7, 1995
The city council, acting as the canvassing board for the city, is responsible for certifying
election returns prior to their being sent to the Ramsey County Auditor. At the November
7, 1995 election, Sue Gehrz received the most votes for the office of Mayor and Sam
Jacobs and Jan Gibson Talbot received the most votes for the two city council seats.
Motion was made by Councilmember Hustad to approve Resolution 95-29, certifying the
city election returns. Motion passed unanimously.
EXPLANATION AND APPROVAL OF THE LARPENTEUR AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY
PLAN
Engineer Maurer explained that the county's reconstruction of Larpenteur Avenue will
involve the city council approving the acquisition of several easements. He introduced
Dan Soler of Ramsey County, who could explain the details more thoroughly.
City Council Minutes
November 8, 1995
Page 2
Soler noted that the municipalities involved in the reconstruction must approve the
easements because this project involves federal funds. Most of the easements are
temporary in nature and would ordinarily just be obtained on an informal basis.- Soler
showed the council the proposed easements, explaining that most are being acquired in
order to allow crews to perform nearby construction or to facilitate drainage. Permanent
easements are being requested for traffic signals at Cleveland/Larpenteur and at
Gortner/Larpenteur and also for parking on the south side of Larpenteur between Arona
and Pascal. No permanent easements are being requested from residential properties
except the parking easement for the apartment properties on the south side of Larpenteur.
Soler further explained that they are erring on the conservative side in their request by
asking for more easement than the county may eventually need.
Councilmember Gehrz asked about plans for a tunnel under Larpenteur to connect the
north and south sides of the golf course. Soler replied that the plans are not concrete at
this point; it may depend upon whether funding is available. Lighting the tunnel is an
issue that will .eventually need to be addressed. Mayor Baldwin commented that there is
areal hazard to golfers crossing Larpenteur but that the city will likely have little impact
over whether it is built. The University of Minnesota will have to find the funds to pay for
its construction and the county will need to determine if a tunnel under their road is an
appropriate use.
Motion was made by Councilmember Jacobs to approve the Larpenteur Avenue right-of-
way plan. Motion passed unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 95-30, ELECTING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE
METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT
Administrator Hoyt reported that the Metropolitan Council is encouraging cities to
participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. The program is designed to
provide financial incentives to communities throughout the metro area to accommodate
affordable housing. The Met Council establishes benchmark goals for several indicators
that are used to measure a community's affordability. With its current housing stock,
Falcon Heights nearly meets or exceeds all of these benchmarks and therefore will not be
required to expand its affordability measures. There are no financial implications one way
or the other for the city to participate in this voluntary program.
Following a discussion of the benchmark data, a motion was made by Councilmember
Gibson Talbot to approve Resolution 95-30. Motion passed unanimously.
REVIEW OF DRAFT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
Administrator Hoyt explained that staff has been working to review and revise the city's
tax increment financing plan, which was last amended in 1988. The council received a
copy of the staff's most recent draft of the proposed amendments; however, the city
attorney must still review the amendments for conformity to current TIF laws. The staff
also reviewed the principles and procedures for private requests for city financial
City Council Minutes
November 8, 1995
Page 3
assistance with the council. Hoyt recommended postponing the scheduling of a public
hearing until the attorney has completed his review of the proposed amendments.
APPROVAL OF COMMUNITY PLAYROOM STAFF APPOINTMENTS
The council received a copy of the individuals who desire seasonal appointment as
playroom attendants for the 1995-96 season. Councilmember Hustad excused himself
from this vote, as a member of his family was proposed for appointment.
Motion was made by Councilmember Gehrz to approve the hiring of Diane Meyer, Julie
Obermiller, Nan Knutsen, Kathy Schaefer, Greg Schaefer, and Wendy Teisberg as seasonal
playroom attendants. Motion passed unanimously.
CITY INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Councilmember Gehrz announced activities related to Minnesota Chemical Health Week
and asked about the city's policy about animals in city parks. She was informed that the
Park and Recreation Commission is currently examining that topic.
Mayor Baldwin congratulated the winning mayoral and council candidates and thanked
them for running.
Councilmember Gibson Talbot thanked her campaign supporters for their work on her
campaign.
Administrator Hoyt noted the end of streetsweeping, the coming of the hockey boards and
rink flooding, and the progress on the school playground construction.
The council also had a brief discussion regarding the process that was used to select a
new Councilmember in 1990, in anticipation of a January 1996 vacancy in Councilmember
Gehrz's seat. This topic will be more fully discussed in 1997 once the office is officially
vacant.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:14 p.m.
Tom Baldwin, Mayor
Carla Asleson
Recording Secretary
~f
City of Falcon Heights
Planning Commission
Date: 11 /27/95
ITEM: Update on the comprehensive planning study of the Community Business
District/southeast corner of Snelling and Larpenteur
SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Administrator
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
The city is working with Fred Hoisington, a planning consultant, to review the way
the southeast corner is addressed in the comprehensive plan. In an effort to
determine if and when redevelopment might be feasible in the future, Fred Hoisingotn
and the administrator met with some developers to get their insights into the area.
Staff will briefly summarize these discussions for commissioners.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Staff update.
U
City of Falcon Heights
Planning Commission
Date: 1 1 /27/95
•
~~
ITEM: Information on the Livable Communities Act
SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Administrator
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
The 1995 state legislature passed legislation directed at expanding affordable housing opportunities
throughout the metropolitan area. The program is "Livable Communities" and is being administered
by the Metropolitan Council. Cities are being asked to voluntary participate in the program and, as part
of their participation, to establish "affordability" goals. There are some financial incentives for
participating to some communities. They are directed at cleaning up polluted sites and building new
affordable housing.
CITY Il~iDF.X BENCHMARK GaAL
affordability
Ownership 60% I 68-77%
Rents! I 85% 45138% -
Life-Cycle
Type (Non-single family
detached) ~5% 36-31%
OwnerJrenter Mix 56144% (64-74) /
(2b-36)%
Density
Single-Family Detached 3.~/acre I ' 1.3-2.9/acre
Ylultifamiiy I I7/acre I 12-IS/acre
__1
The City of Falcon Heights has agreed to participate with the understanding that the community is
already very affordable. The city exceeds the affordability benchmark in a number of areas, which are
established based upon planning areas and a 51 15,000 home as affordable. Most notably the city's
rental housing has 85% of the housing stock affordable. (This is not only university housing.) The
owner occupied housing is slightly shy of the benchmark. However, given the city's rental affordability
and high density development, it is unlikely that the Metropolitan Council will look for active increases
in this area. This is particularly true because Falcon Heights single family market values increased at
a slower rate (1.64% from 1994 to 1995) than some of the outlying suburbs like White Bear Township
(3.12% from 1994 to 1995) where new single family construction is going on. If housing values
continue to rise more rapidly in the further suburbs than in Falcon Heights, Falcon Heights will become
more affordable by comparison.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Staff update for commission information.
-! 1-95 (1:4d a~~!
P001
MEDIAN CHANGE iN MARKITT VALUE QF SINGL$ FAMtCY H
• pN1E
iRAMSa:Y counrrn 5 gY CITY
P~ ~ X910
Munk) aftty ?994 Median
Nome Value 1'995 Medlar
PercerrC
amen ~+Ilts Home Value cltan e
Fakan Heights 127500 130'! SQ
248
Gem taste ~09s00 111400
1.6~
Lauderdale 1008[70 102~pp _ _
2.08
tlttfe Canada 70&Ot7 71~pp
1.13
Map+ewood 9995Q ZQ1950
2.00
Mounds 1/Ieyy ssloo ~~
2.43
New Brygnton 83100 - 85300
2:65
North oaks 102900
100
4.27
North St:
Paul 24760p 2!r'&3CiQ 3.51
.
Roseville 789f)Q $140p
3.17
Shoreview gs9ao X8300
2.50
.
~p~ng take Park 1?~ 1184pp
2.96
St Anthony 7920t? ~~
2.27
St P'aui 1?1900 1'12800
-~
Vadnals Helght5 6780Q ~~
~~
UUt'tlte Bear Lake 1052op 108400
3-iy4
White Bear -~~ 85200 g75Qb
2.70
1d09pp 1Q4050
3.12
as
•
4
PbsHt" Wand ia7t trarfsn,ir~~ .,._~_ _.._.
benchmarks:
lannina Areas and
R. I11AN6H •E/MLL t
[Al, LINWOOO North
S
t ' EVAN! fil°IOVE ^ETN[L St1 Paul
ec ors North ~~ ~
Minnea polis
Fully Developed Area A.Y.LY .NOOVIA NAr `°`""LY°
LAK! L
NEW ICAND4
Developing Area AMOK. `° , r,AK`
Freestanding Growth AO EA. '
LA,TOr
e ~~ ~
, ~~~~ Northeast t
LINO LAKE[ '
Paul
c
oN 4,N~ .
Center
Northwest RA.10•
CN Y.LI
laA"' ~ N000
`
"`r
Rural Area
M/nneap0/%S
..EO'
L6
INOTON
~~ ~~~~
ClNTL111r~LLL NA=T
(~n
~`1N Y ®(a(
u~, Y Ifs
AOCKf
OAO
Cg1CORAM
YAK[ OAOY[-
•AOOKLYN 7 OA
[ ~ [vI[w
MOATN l
..."
LnuNN1T[A
~s}.~~1 I1I}~. IIIfT~~11 I
I IILYV ~ p~~~ey~. ,riW,~
0.:0
~YT .AAK ' LLT L'.
N ~R t 000
OAKE.
LIR
Se
ctor names in .
~
. 1 T GAANT
AR[
it
li
INOLR[NO[NC[ ^.oRITTO
~ a aeN
(la LCL Aoliu• LI~q oYLOI
NTK::
a
cs „, M1 ; Q
. L TLR
YAAL[
-LAIN r[LINA ~~rY OUTN
IT. ANTN
L i.7 .. .'.:
~..
. t.
A- KNM
.: KOI/Y tLL[' NA NOI
. '.. YRORT
...
~
. J
~ fT:' ..
LAKL
.:: L(INO4Kl a OLOEtI ...
' AOL ::: EAYTOWN
ALLL. ~ 'A.Ldwooo-..:.. .......
[R10wN YINNtTAI LTA - a:
' . :
_ I[OA~
~ .
~
aONO
IM N ~~~~~
:: ::.
1
" wLET
LAKLLANO
NOLLrM000
'. Ifs jl
ITONKA
~
I
lT~ NNLAA
LOY/E
-AAK OLif - L
R. AAYL LLANO
WARRTO"LI t0 lT•
1/ACIYt
YOVNO 1/- ! M
' ~ [LANG LN 011[•
S "«u
f
L
outh rl e V t f110A1wO00. ~~ wl[T w000LUA1
'. EATON T. YARPL -qNT
Mi
li '°'"` _. lT.
'•°` '
~,
nneapo
N[w wAewu
OUYANT sYlQ o.,
oN AN NAfaN
lD[N
ou.Nn.
"' ""° n` AAY
, lw Ar Southeast
WAGONIA
CAYOEN
LAKE20WN - .K.I AIL St
Paul
. eA_,~I~
~/YRY Y If1~~aywT
ILJ Y NAIKA
.. ~ .. tLO0Y1KOTOM -
L401N IN VI L AK
LA OML
T• f
ENYAAK
. E 60T TA6['~
Y MO AY[RIC
AAA(((~~~,E CN• A -:' ~
t ~ OAOY!
OYO
NOKw LEMON
~
OANLCA[N
OAAY
A y~ KEOM - LNAKOMt
:
tAYAOt WRM fY1 Lli~
IR
'
~
rd/NG AYEAICA
~
..
~. A
Lt
.
:
YAiLLY
AOL(YOUMt
QOLOONf
gNArwea
LouuYLLE ...
i.:: .~nlow;.-.: .... ..
- ..
• ~
.. ...... NININC(A
.. ~ ...:: .....::: :• ~~
.. `:.
_.
. .....LAKt ::
..........
.: c:c:::::
:: :.::::::::::
:::::eo~itc
__ ..
NANGOCK LAM
iKANCILCO LANG CA[[K :: ;A
......... K[YI LGi:::.::
......::::::::::
YtAY1LL10N
10AR
/AINO LA
K[
.........
.........
CAEdf
AN[A
..........
....... EY/1AL
^
AA EMAN YENMA
T'
UMNEN(:E - ~~ g
~®~~
::
~.. ~® YfAY410r
~ `' Y' South St
Paul
.[ I ` South Minneapolis $T N• °T~"~ ,
DOUGUI
Atw rAAR[T CA[iLL LJ NLw
LUKELY LEILE /lNN[ NQEMA CEOM LAKE ~}.~ fUR[/A AOCL TAI [A
LLRO NArATON YIt WILLE
N[w MAOYE
0 ~
L 0
20 30 C
I 1
AEENV.tE wArML O AANOOv
wrA AAwoaLAN
1
Miles
R~~~~'t' County
ST. PAUL City
LINWOOD Township
I. 1PRINO LAKE PARK I1, PALCON NEIONt9 21. VlVOOIANp
2. COLUMBIA NEIOMS 12. LILYOAU: ZZ. WAY2ATA
J. WKIERWE 17. MENOOTA D. NRPORT
~. OIRCNWOOD IE. 9UNf18N WEE 2t. U.4. GOVT.
!. PINe BPIIINOB IL. 9Pi11N0 PARK 24. MEDK:INE WEe
d. WVOfALL 10. MINNeTONKA BeACN ?4. R4B[MNt OALe
>'. LlouNOevlew II. roNK eAr n cRYlTAL
e. Yn+ne aeAR nvP Is. exceuEloR 2t. NtW NOPe
O. O!M W(e It. OReeNW000 Zo. d100KLYN CeNTER
10. WJOeROALe 20. O[EPMAVlN -
d.
City of Falcon Heights
Planning Commission
Date: 11 /27/95
ITEM: Land Use Comparisons for the Metropolitan Area
SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Administrator
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
The Metropolitan Council provided the city with land use information over the past
two decades. The attached information reviews land use changes by category for
Falcon Heights, Ramsey County and the metropolitan area for 1970, 1980 and 1990.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 - Land use map of Falcon Heights
• 2 - Graphs of land use distribution for 1970, 1980 and 1990
• 1990 Land Use
The 1990 land use data was developed by the Metropolitan Cowncil using aerial photos taken at an
elevation of 19,200 feet Land use changes between 1984 and 1990 were delineated on 36" x 36"
mylar overlays on top of existing 1984 land use data. This information was then digitized into
the Councils computer system using PC Arclnfo Software. Each of the 251 individual photo tiles
were edgematched. Additional registration carrections were performed using the Minnesota Department
of Transportation Road Center Line data as a reference. The resulting land use data is presumed
to meet national map accuracy standards for 1:24,000.
RESIDENTIAL 1, 2 & 11
- Single family homes and associated yard area.
- Multi-family housing including duplex, triplex, townhomes and
apartment buildings, associated parking and adjacent grounds
- Single family homesteads and buildin
s
i
g
assoc
ated with agricultural
production.
NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPED 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7
- Commercial retail
d
ffi
an
o
ce uses and their associated parking
d
d
an
a
jacent grounds.
- Industrial buildings, storage yeards and mining extractive uses.
- Public institutions
schools and
,
government facilities (except
outdoor recreation areas).
- Public and private airports and associated buildings and facilities.
- Nature
• preserves, parks, golf courses and outdoor recreation lands.
production.
:::: ~ NON-URBAN 8
-Open land or agricultural lands with out buildings.
- Vacant land reserved for industrial development
~, .
- Vagnt land held by public or semi public organizations
WETLANDS
National Wetland Inventory Wetlands
OUTSIDE CITY
Areas outside the boundaries of a city but completely surrounded by
the cit
b
i
y
e
ng mapped.
ROADS 9
^ - Four or more lane divided highways with rights-of-ways greater than
200 feet.
WATER 10
• Open water areas.
~~ ~ MUSH LINE
~ `/ Municipal Urban Service Area boundary as of Dec. 1992.
/U ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROADS
/~ / LOCAL ROADS
• /v
1.990 Land Use for City of
•
•
Falcon Heights
p I 1 I I I I I I I I
.....
.... .......•.. .... :..::..:..: ..: ~ -~ ~ ~ 4
..
.......
........ z~
~..
...
........
~ ~:
^^ -
?A+t°
~~
.......... :........... .... .... i _ I
Y! ~ ....
..:
~.
.. .
I
I
1
\I
Felon Halphte
Metropollten Coundl beptamber 21, 1996
I
~~ ~~_ ~
I. .: I i
i I i
~ I /
bole ~howe t /4 tulle IewaemenL
FALC:,ON HEIGHTS LAND USE (IN ACRES)
1970 _-- ~~~~-~ 1980
RAMS,EY COUNTY LAND USE (IN ACRES)
1970 ~ 1980
1
ax n ~%~ ,.
METROPC
1970
nwuamua
)LITAN AREA LAND USE (I~
1980
~.~n.~u
i~re~w
xwrovnre
-/-_
1990
1990
uwwwnzeo
was ~smuw
r«•~vn
vue~k~
n[cnfwµ coM Yncva
INW~RUL
J ACRES)
lsso
weic a
xoxa+ekcn ix
~* waa a amuua
~~
7
•
City of Falcon Heights
Planning Commission
Date: 1 1 /27/95
•
ITEM: Review of proposed amendments to the zoning code
SUBMITTED BY: Carla Asleson, Administrative Assistant/Planner
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
Staff is in the process of preparing several minor amendments to the city zoning
code. The proposed changes, with one or two exceptions, would clarify the
existing code rather than create new policy. Proposed text containing these
changes will be brought to Monday night's meeting.
Among the proposed amendments are:
• A requirement that when an attached garage is converted to living space,
the owner must construct a replacement garage on the property. If the
property has access to an alley, the existing driveway would be required to
be removed.
• A clarification regarding the placement of decks, stoops, and covered
porches in front yards.
• Changes to the requirements for a hot tub vs. a swimming pool (currently,
the zoning requirements are the same)
• Corrections where there is contradictory requirements within the zoning code
ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Review proposed amendments to the zoning code.
2. Schedule a public hearing on the amendments for January 22, 1996.
•
P
City of Falcon Heights
Planning Commission
Date: 1 1 /27/95
ITEM: Update on meeting schedule for December 1995
SUBMITTED BY: Carla Asleson, Administrative Assistant/Planner
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
The planning commission's regular meeting date for next month falls on December
25, a legal holiday. A request to have a variance considered at the planning
commission's December meeting was received this week (too late to be considered
this month). Therefore, the December meeting needs to be rescheduled to
December 1 1 to consider this variance in a timely manner.
Please check your calendars and indicate to staff whether you will be able to
attend a meeting on December 1 1 th. A quorum of four commissioners is needed
to take action at a commission meeting.