HomeMy WebLinkAboutPCAgenda_92Sep28r
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
September 28, 1992
7:30 p.m.
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL: Lee Barry Len Boche
Steve Huso Carolyn Nestingen Ken Salzberg
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
D. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
E. REPORTS, REQUESTS, RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Request for a variance in §9-4.01[4)(c) of the zoning
code, the sideyard setback, at 1603 Northrop Street
2. Request to contract with the Hoisington Koegler Group to
review and revise the city's business zones
3. Review and approve the proposed 1993 five year capital
improvement program (CIP)
F. ADJOURN
•
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
July 27, 1992
PRESENT'
ABSENT'
ALSO PRESENT'
Lee Barry Len Boche Paul Ciernia, Council
Marie Furton Ed Finegan Liaison
Steve Huso Carolyn Nestingen
Ken Salzberg Susan Hoyt, Admin-
istrator/Planner
Meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Lee Barry, chair.
Minutes of the Special Planning Commission Meeting of July 8, 1992
were approved as written.
REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE OPERATION OF A
CERAMICS CLASS AS A HOME OCCUPATION AT 1484 CALIFORNIA AVENUE IN AN
R-1 ZONE.
The property owner, Maureen Blustein is requesting a conditional
use permit to operate a ceramics class three evenings per week from
6:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. in the basement of her single family home on
California Avenue. The C.U.P. is required because one part of the
home occupation does not meet condition 9-14.02[25](d)(4) which
requires that no more than normal parking be associated with the
home occupation. Ms. Blustein's home business may result in a
maximum of ten cars beyond what is associated with her family.
Ms. Blustein stated that she has been negotiating a lease
arrangement with the proprietors of Northome Shopping Center to
lease up to ten spaces in the parking lot to the west of her home.
She also stated that her evening classes would be held during the
week and not on weekends.
Chair Barry questioned whether Ms. Blustein had a signed copy of
the letter agreement with Northome Shopping Center. She indicated
she is waiting for approval of the Conditional Use Permit before
signing the lease.
Ken Salzburg asked whether the extra fire wall had been installed
and Ms. Blustein said that the fire marshal indicated a fire door
would be adequate and would be installed before the classes begin.
A neighbor, Ruth Gabriel, attended the meeting and wanted to be
sure what the parking arrangements would be. She was satisfied
• after hearing of the pending lease agreement with Northome Shopping.
Center proprietors.
•
1. The home occupation (ceramics classes) must meet all
requirements of §9-14.01, Subd. 25 with the exception of
2. Hours of operation be limited to three evenings during the
week from 6:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M.
3. Number of participants be limited to ten persons.
4. Deliveries be restricted to routine deliveries typical
of any non-business residence in an R-1 zone.
5. A current lease between property owner and Northome
Shopping Center providing parking spaces for the number of
students in class.
•
7. The facilities meet the fire marshal's, electrical
inspectors and building official's codes. The fire
marshal annually inspects the business with the renewal
of the home occupation license.
8. No sales of class ceramics products to outside parties
be conducted on the premises. In other words, no on-
going craft shop or sales. (The property owner may have
garage and craft sales as defined in the zoning code.)
Motion was made by Ken Salzburg and seconded by Marie Furton to
approve the conditional use permit as amended by discussion:
6. Class participants be required to park in the Northome
parking lot.
9. Any hazardous wastes such as paints and glazes be
disposed of according to the approved practice as
recommended by the fire marshal.
The motion carried unanimously.
T~he`e being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:55 P.M.
Patricia Phillips,
ing Secretary
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 9, 1992
Baldwin convened the meeting at 7:00 p.m.
ALL MEMBERS PRESENT
Baldwin, Ciernia, Gehrz, Gibson Talbot and Jacobs. Alwo present
were Chenoweth, Hoyt and Maurer.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF 8/20/92 AND 8/26/92
Council approved the following minutes by unanimous consent:
1. Special Meeting of August 20, 1992
2., Regular Meeting of August 26, 1992
CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED
Council approved the following Consent Agenda by unanimous
consent:
1. Disbursements:
a. General Disbursements through 9/2/92, $19,174.29
•
2. b. Payroll, 8/16/92 - 8/31/92, $10,267.13
Scheduling the following public hearings:
a. Hearing on delinquent utility assessments, October
14, 1992 at 7:00 p.m.
b. Hearing on delinquent diseased tree removal
charges, October 14, 1992 at 7:15 p.m.
3. Adoption of Resolution R-92-34 rescinding Resolution
R-92-12 regarding conditional use permit for veterinary
clinic at 1533 W. Larpenteur
4. Designation of election judges for November 3, 1992
general election
5. Awarding the tree trimming contract for. the 1992 fall
trimming in the University Grove area to S and S Tree
Specialists
6. Authorizing replacement of yard hydrant at Community
Park
7. Resignation of Marie A. Furton from the Planning
Commission
8. Licenses: Green Mechanical, Inc, #0981 and Bunk Bed
Bargains Co. #0982
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION R-92-35 ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON
1992 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Maurer presented the proposed street improvement project which
includes certain streets in University Grove and Falcon Woods 1
• and 2, together with a proposed schedule for implementation and
completion of the project if approved. He explained that the
first step in the process is ordering the engineer to prepare the
• MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 9, 1992
PAGE 2
feasibility study. Baldwin explained that the decision to
upgrade the city streets was established by the city's
infrastructure improvement program and the only decisions to be
made with each upcoming improvement is to approve the finite
details for each project. Following a brief discussion Jacobs
moved adoption of Resolution R-92-35 which carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION R-92-35
A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON 1993 STREET
IMPROVEMENTS
ASSESSMENT POLICY FOR ALLEYS TO BE ADDRESSED AT 9/23/92 MEETING
Maurer reviewed his report dated September 3, 1992 (a copy of
which is on file in the city office) regarding reconstruction of
the city's deteriorating alleys. A discussion ensued regarding
a possible survey of affected property owners to obtain their
opinions on the matter, estimated cost of such a project, and the
possibility of amending the present assessment policy for alleys.
Council concurred that the assessment policy should be addressed
• prior to a survey of the property owners. Maurer will prepare
adjustments to the alley assessment policy based on an 80/20 and
a 90/10 split for Council consideration.
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION REGARDING INTENT TO REIMBURSE 1993 STREET
IMPROVEMENT COSTS FROM TAX EXEMPT DEBT
Hoyt explained that this is a federal government regulation which
requires cities to declare their intent to reimburse expenditures
from tax exempt debt sold after March 2, 1992. Since the city
plans to do street improvements in 1993 and may wish to issue
bonds, it "is necessary to adopt the proposed resolution. Gehrz
moved adoption of Resolution R-92-36 which carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION R-92-36
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO 1993 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
DECLARING INTENT OF CITY TO REIMBURSE COSTS THEREOF WITH
TAX-EXEMPT DEBT
REQUEST FOR STOP SIGNS ON ARONA AT RUGGLES DISCUSSED
Maurer addressed the request from Arona Street residents that a
stop sign be placed at the intersection of Arona and Ruggles to
reduce speeding on Arona Street. 'He explained that typically
• signs are not used for traffic control and that there are some
drawbacks such as more noise and fumes from vehicles stopping and
starting, and giving pedestrians a feeling a false security when
MINUTES
• MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 9, 1992
PAGE 3
crossing the street. Following a discussion staff was directed
to prepare a response to the request indicating that Council is
not opposed to placement of the signs but making them aware of
possible problems.
UPDATE ON CITY'S TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS
Fiscal Consultant Steve Apfelbacher reviewed his report dated
September 3, 1992 (a copy of which is on file in the city office)
relating to the status of the city's tax increment districts,
possible use of any remaining TIF revenue after the districts
terminate, and the feasibility of issuing refunding bonds for
certain districts. Apfelbacher also explained that the current
owners of District 2-1/Bullseye has expressed interest in finding
a solution to remove or reduce the minimum market value as
established in the development agreement. Council agreed that if
the matter can be worked out to the city's satisfaction they
might be interested and directed Apfelbacher to pursue further
discussion with the property owners.
Apfelbacher recommended no decision be made regarding issuing
• refund bonds until after the discussion with the Bullseye owners.
If an agreement with Bullseye cannot be reached TIF District 2-1
could be included in refunding for the other districts.
Apfelbacher will provide Council with the results of the
discussion at a future meeting.
ITEM P-5, CONSIDERING OF REFUNDING CITY BONDS DEFERRED
This matter was deferred due to the action taken on the previous
item.
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION RELATING TO REDUCING THE 1993 DEBT LEVY ON
G.O. DEBT
Ciernia moved adoption of Resolution R-92-37 which carried
unanimously.
.RESOLUTION R-92-37
A RESOLUTION REDUCING THE 1993 DEBT LEVY ON
GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT
1993 BUDGET HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/9/92 WITH CONTINUATION ON
12/16/92
Council by unanimous consent scheduled the public hearing on the
• 1993 budget for 7:05 p.m. on December 9, 1992 and the
continuation hearing (if necessary) for 7:05 p.m., December 16,
1992.
1992.
MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 9, 1992
PAGE 4
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE PROPOSED 1993 BUDGET
Gibson Talbot moved adoption of Resolution R-92-38 which carried
unanimously.
RESOLUTION R-92-38
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE PROPOSED GENERAL
FUND BUDGET OF $1,032,038 AND CERTIFIED LEVY
OF $686,164 TO THE RAMSEY COUNTY AUDITOR
1993 FIRE CONTRACT WITH CITY OF LAUDERDALE APPROVED
Hoyt explained that the contract is the same as the 1992 contract
approved by Council in June except for the call rate increase
from $292.00 per call to $306.00 per call., Jacobs moved approval
of the contract which carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
• .The meeting was adjourned at 8:36 p.m.
Tom Baldwin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Shirley Chenoweth, City Clerk
•
1-C
subdivision 4. Standards for Granting of Variance. No
variance shall be granted unless the city council shall make
without qualification on the basis of evidence presented at
the meeting the following findings:
a. That the granting of the variance will not be
detrimental to thee-public welfare;
b. That the granting of the variance will not substantially
diminish or impair property values or improvements in the
area;
c. That the granting of the variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights;
d. That the variance will not impair an adequate supply of
light and air to adjacent property;
e. That the variance will not impair the orderly use of the
public streets;
f. That the variance will not increase the danger of fire
or endanger the public safety;
g. Whether the shape, topographical condition or other
similar characteristic of the tract is such as to
distinguish it substantially from all of the other
properties in the zoning district of which it is a part, or
whether a particular hardship, as distinguished from mere
inconvenience to the owner, would result if the strict
letter of the chapter were carried out;
h. Whether the variance is sought principally to increase
financial gain to the owner of the property, and to
determine whether a substantial hardship to the owner would
result from a denial of the variance;
i. Whether the conditions which give rise to the
application for the variance arose after the adoption of
this chapter of the code of the City of Falcon Heights or
any amendment thereto which placed the tract in a zoning
district different from what it was under the chapter. In
the consideration of this item, the city shall make diligent
inquiry as to all changes in the property and shall refuse
to grant the variance if the problem is one that can be
solved through a proper application of a conditional use
permit or an amendment of the zoning code. Financial
hardship shall not be a basis for the granting of a variance
when the owner purchased the property in reliance on a
promise that a variance would be granted, and the city shall
dismiss the appeal if it shall appear that the property was
purchased on such reliance.
Subdivision 5. Conditions. The city may attach such
conditions to the grant of the variance as it shall
determine will be necessary or desirable to bring it within
the purpose and intent of the chapter. A public record
shall be maintained of such conditions.
•
•
Date:9/28/92
Agenda item: 2
ITEM: Request to contract with the Hoisington Koegler Group
to review and revise the city's business zones
SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Administrator
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
In November, 1991 the planning commission completed the new
comprehensive plan for the city under the guidance of the
Hoisington Group. Several recommendations were included in the
implementation section of the document (Attachment A). The first
four related to the city's business zones. These zones require
some careful review and revisions to make sure that the
permitted, conditional and permitted accessory uses are
compatible with the current and future business districts in the
city.
Reviewing and revising these districts can guarantee that the
appropriate controls are in place to keep the land uses
compatible within each district, as well as compatible with the
adjacent residential properties. The close proximity between
residential and commercial land uses makes this a critical issue
to assure neighborhood quality on into the future.
The Hoisington Koegler Group submitted a proposal for
out these activities for not more than $2,000. There
in the city's 1992 planning budget to cover the cost
project.
ATTACHMENTS:
carrying
are funds
of this
A - Hoisington/Koegler Proposal
B - Section of Comprehensive Plan
C - Business Zones (and Zoning Map)
r~
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend the hiring of the Hoisington Koegler Group to review
and revise the city's business zones as recommended in the city's
comprehensive land use plan.
Hoisington Kcegler Group Inc.
H IC
~~ 1
Ms. Susan Hoyt, City Administrator ~ ~ 1gg2
City of Falcon Heights ~~Q
2077 West Larpenteur Avenue
Falcon Heights, MN 55113-5594
z-A
September 4, 1992
Re: Proposal for Drafting Zoning Ordinance Business District Amendments
Dear Ms. Hoyt:
Per your request, I herewith submit this proposal to assist the Cit3r of Falcon Heights
with the updating of its Zoning Ordinance to bring it into compliance with the new
Comprehensive Plan specifically regarding commercial districts.
Our Work Program will include the following:
1. Review of existing zoning ordinance business provisions.
2. Development of zoning concepts to be reviewed with business persons.
3. One meeting with business representatives to present the proposed amendment
concepts (City to make all meeting arrangements).
4. Preparation of ordinance amendments considering comments from business
persons.
5. One meeting with City Staff to review ordinance changes.
6. Attendance at one Planning Commission and one City Council meeting (or
public hearings) to assist with the presentation of the ordinance amendments.
Based on the above Work Program, the fee will not exceed $2,000. The City will be
billed on an hourly plus expenses basis in accordance with the attached hourly rate
schedule.
We thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal and look forward to being of
continuing service to the City of Falcon Heights.
Sincerely,
• Fr d Hoisington, AICP
Planning Consultant
FLH/glh
7300 Metro Boulevard /Suite 525
Land Use /Environmental ^ Planning /Design
^ Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 (612) 835-9960 Fax: (612) 835-3160
•
HOISINGTON GROUP INC.
1992 HOURLY RATES
•
Principal .................................................$ 7 5- 9 0'/ h r
Professional ...........................................$ 4 0- 6 0/ h r
Technician ........................................ $ 3 5 / h r
Secretarial ..................................................... $ 3 2 / h r
Testimony .................................................. $120/hr
C:
•
:7
a
O
O
to
0
Z
a
Z
N
T
I..L
O ~i
~ ~'
~ 'c
cn .Q O
N
-.`. p (~S
~ ~ ~
~a
~ O m
O
C U __~
•- .L E
U j _
N :~ ~~
~ U ~
__ O
O Q (~
~. ~
~ a. ~
~ '~ ~
m-
~ ~ -
C ~? ~
•C U O
O X ;r
N m 'r
~ ~ C
m
~ U a oC
ao of
~ ~
L O 3 ~
'~ O ~
Q. U O
C O ~ '
O .~ E O
"~`" ~_
'y ~ O O
O C
~ ~ U .~,,
U U O C
;~ r-=- C C
~ O N O
_~~ O
.U O C •O a
O ~ ~ ~ ~
.~~~~ ~
cii O
~ U O Q ~
o ~ -~ ~
o ~- ~
O U ~ ~
O i 0..
-~ ~ .a a~
U c O •C N
O N ~ O ~
L
N
O ~ ~ m ~
N ~ ~ O O
ai ~ oU c
~ ~ ~ L (~
~~~~~
N
a~
a~
C
~E
i
O
c
O
U
C
O
c
ro
a~
O
U
C
(~
m
a
0
T
O
O)
C
.~
O
O
N
v
.O
0
Q
CD
.O
c
c~
m
m
N
N
~ U
(~ 'C
E vs
Q~
T
W
c
0
.~
O
O
m
U
C
c~
E
0
c
O
U
m
N
O
a~i o
~ 'cn
T
t'~
U
.~
00
w
m
,~-•
O
N
C
W
N
~ ~3
'~ U
C
~ 3
n. m c
O U (~
m ~ d
~ ~ ~
•-
•~ o
..• p ._
~ ~3
i .N m
~ 3 c
~~c~
^. c~ °-
0
~ ~ U
O ~ O
~ 'D ~
'y C •-
tIS N
p i C
~~~
o ~ u,
U
~ ~ ~
~ d~
N
T
~ Q
C O
E
N ~
0
~ C
C _O
QN
Q
L U
~ '~
O Q
O
~O W
~~
'~ Rf
Z N
M m
~ ~ m
m O O
m N O
~ m
U ~
M
O
.~ ,Q C
c~
c0
~
7
m N ~ N
O
=
V N 3
~ ~~~~~
~ ~ N ~ O C .V
O ~
~
O
U U
'~ ~ C
~
O
N o c~
O N '~= O~
U ~ ~ ~ > 7
~ j
~ U N '-
c~ i U _
O N ~ ~
~ ~ ~ _
V~ ~ ~ ~
N .N.. O ,'~. O f~ O O Q
O Q ~
O~ O~
m N
~ c~
u
QOO~
o ,RS ~
~
°~
cn
~-
w
~ `~
O V j N ~~~~ U U
~~. rte..
~ Q-
a ~ C ~ > ~' ~ .~
C~ ~ N~ cn O
m .
~0 O O
i
~ 0 0~ O O Q
'
C
O N N
> ~
Q' "-
N ~ ~ ~
~ i ~ ~> O
~ O
Uc ~ OC U3-N°Q°
rY ~ ~ ~
Q~
a
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 9-7.01/8.01 ~~
i. Off street parking spaces required (1) space
• equals three hundred fifty (350) squ feet) shall be as
follows for:
Multiple dwellings. A east two (2) parking spaces
per dwelling unit e t that two and one-half (2
1/2) parking spa per dwelling unit are required
for multiple s of ten or less that abut no
parking (on reet curb) zones. At least one half
(1/2) of a required spaces shall be enclosed.
(Gaya requirements may be waived for apartment
pro' cts designed and intended for occupancy by low
ome families).
Sub ision 6. Signs. As permitted by the "R-1" district.
ubdivision 7. Swimmincr Pools. As permitted by the "R-1"
district.
PART 8. "B-1" LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT
r
~/ 9-8.01 "B-1" Limited Business District
Subdivision 1. Permitted Uses. No structure or land shall
be used except for one (1) or more of the following uses:
a. Municipal buildings and structures, excluding storage
of maintenance equipment and trucks over one and one-half
(1 1/2) tons, stockpiling of aggregate and open storage
of material, but including fire fighting apparatus,
provided these shall not be located within thirty (30)
feet of any lot of an abutting lot in an "R" District.
b. Banks and other financial institutions.
c. Medical and dental clinics.
d. Offices of a general nature when the employment
within the building and the operations do not include
retail sales or warehousing from the site.
e. Art studio, interior decorating studio, photographic
studio, music studio, dance studio provided no
manufacturing is conducted on the site.
Subdivision 2. Conditional Uses. No structure or land
shall be used for the following uses except by conditional
use permit:
•
54
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 9-8.01
.]
a. Hospitals for human care, nursing homes, rest or
retirement homes, provided the site shall contain not
less than six hundred (600) square feet of lot area
for each person to be accommodated and that no
building be located less than thirty (30) feet from
the side lot line.
b. Funeral homes and mortuaries.
c. Radio and television studios.
d. Radio and television receiving and transmitting
devices.
e. Private clubs and lodges not operated for a profit.
f. Academies, colleges, universities and churches.
g. Historical buildings, museums, art institutes,
galleries and playhouses.
h. Multiple dwellings as permitted and regulated in an
"R" District.
i. Bank and other financial drive in facilities.
j. Veterinarian clinics.
k. Nurseries - day and school
1. Research centers and laboratories.
•
Subdivision 3. Permitted Accessory Uses. The following
uses shall be permitted accessory use.
a. Off street parking and loading, signs, fences, and
decorative landscape features as regulated herein.
b. Temporary construction buildings (approved by Zoning
Administrator).
c. Accessory structures other than private garages as
regulated herein. The design and placement of the
accessory buildings must be approved by the Council as
being in harmony with the surrounding limited business
district .after review and recommendation by the Planning
Commission.
d. Essential service structures, provided no building
shall be located within thirty (30) feet of an abutting
lot in an "R" District.. The placement of the essential
service structure must be approved by the Council as
being in harmony with the surrounding limited business
district after review and recommendation by the Planning
Commission.
e. Public telephone booths or drive up. The placement
of the telephone booth or drive up must be approved by
the Council as being in harmony with the surrounding
limited business district after review and recommendation
by the Planning Commission.
•
f. Other as deemed normal, customary, and incidental to
the principal use as approved by the Zoning
Administrator.
55
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 9-8.01/9.01
.Subdivision 4. Lot Area, Heiqht, Lot Width and Yard
.Requirements.
'• a. No structure or building shall exceed three (3)
stories or thirty-five (35) feet in height, whichever is
higher except as provided in 9-2.07 of this Code.
b. A side yard abutting on a street shall not be less
than thirty (30) feet and when abutting a lot in an "R"
district shall not be less than thirty (30) feet.
c. The following minimum requirements shall be observed
subject to additional requirements, exceptions and
modifications as set forth in this Section and in 9-2.03.
Lot Lot Front Side Rear
Width Area Yard Yard Yard
90' 12,500 30' 10' or 1/2 the 20'
sq.ft., height of the
building, which-
ever is greater
PART 9.
9-9.01
r~
Maximum lot coverage by structures or paved surfaces of
any type is 75%
"B-1-A" LIMITED BUSINESS AND PROCESSING DISTRICT
"B-1-A" Limited Business and Processing District
Subdivision 1. Permitted Uses. No structure or land shall
be used except for one (1) or more of the following uses:
a. Any use permitted in "R-4 district."
b. Facilities for the wholesale and retail sales of
garden supplies.
c. Banks and financial facilities.
Subdivision 2. Conditional Uses. No structure or land
shall be used except for one (1) or more of the following
uses.
a. Hospitals, rest homes, sanatoriums for human
care.
56
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 9-9.01
b. Mortuaries.
• c. Processing and limited fabrication of a product in
conjunction with any permitted use when such products are
wholly processed within a building and such use is deemed
appropriate and consistent with the character of the
district and environs. Where such uses consist of more
than one principal building, plans for such
development shall be submitted as a Planned Unit
Development as regulated in Part 16.
d. Research centers and laboratories.
e. Publishing and printing houses.
f. Facilities for the wholesale and retail sales of
garden supplies.
Subdivision 3. Permitted Accessory Uses. Any use permitted
in Subdivision 2 of Section 9-8.01 and as regulated therein.
The following additional uses shall be permitted accessory
uses.
a. Accessory structures other than private garages as
regulated herein. The design and placement of the
accessory buildings must be approved by the City Council
as being in harmony with the surrounding business
district after review and recommendation by the Planning
Commission.
b. Essential service structures, provided no building
shall be located within thirty (30) feet of an abutting
lot in an "R" District. The placement of the essential
service structure must be approved by the city council as
being in harmony with the surrounding limited business
district after review and recommendation by the Planning
Commission.
Subdivision 4. Lot Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard
Requirements.
a. No structure or building shall exceed three (3)
stories or thirty-five (35) feet in height whichever is
the greater except as provided for in Section 15.
b. A side yard abutting on a street shall not be less
than thirty (30) feet and when abutting a lot in an "R"
District shall not be less than forty (40) feet.
c. The following minimum requirement shall be observed
subject to additional requirements, exceptions and
modifications as set forth in this Section and Section
15.
r~
L
57
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 9-10.01
Lot Lot Front Side Rear
. Width Area Yard Yard Yard
100' 15,000 sq.ft. 50' 20' 20'
Maximum lot coverage by structures or paved surfaces of any type
is 75%.
P "B-2" RETAIL BUSINESS DISTRICT
9-10.01 "B-2", Retail Business District
subdivision 1. Permitted Uses. No structure or land shall
~~ be used except for one (1) or more of the following uses:
a. Antique or gift shop.
b. Appliance sales and repair.
c. Art and school supply store.
d. Auto accessory store.
e. Bakery goods sales and baking of goods for retail
sales on premises.
f. Bicycle sales and repair.
g. Book, office supply and stationery store.
• h. Candy, ice cream and popcorn, nuts, frozen dessert
and soft drink shop, but not of the drive in type.
i. Camera and photographic supply store.
j. Delicatessen.
k. Drug store.
1. Dry cleaning and laundry pick-up stations including
incidental pressing and repair.
m. Dry goods store.
n. Furniture store, rugs and floor covering sales.
o. Gift or novelty store.
p. Grocery, fruit or vegetable store.
q. Hardware store.
r. Hobby store including handicraft classes not to
exceed ten (10) persons.
s. Jewelry sales and repair store.
t. Laundromat of the self service type.
u. Library.
v. Meat market, but not including processing for a
locker.
w. News stand.
x. Offices.
y. Paint, wallpaper sales. .
z. Photographic studio.
•
58
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 9-10.01
aa. Pipe and tobacco shop.
bb. Record shop.
cc. Restaurant, cafe, tea room.
dd. Shoe sales and repair.
ee. Sporting goods stores.
ff. Variety store.
gg. Wearing apparel shop.
hh. Picture framing.
ii. Radio, television and electronic equipment supply
and repair.
jj. Beauty Shop
kk. Barber Shop
11. Tanning Studio
mm. Video Rental Shop
nn. Packaging and office supplies
oo. Printing or duplicating services provided that no
more than six (6) employees are employed on premises
at any one time.
pp. Multiple dwellings as permitted and regulated in an
"R" District.
qq. Business or trade school when conducted entire
within a building.
rr. Diaper and hand laundry service, dry cleaning plant,
provided not more than six (6) persons are employed
on the premises at any one time.
ss. Electrical service, heating, plumbing, appliance or
air conditioning service shop, provided that no more
than six (6.) persons are employed in repair or
• processing.
tt. Garden supply store provided it is conducted
entirely within an enclosed structure.
uu. Newspaper and publishing office
w. Pet shop provided the operation shall not include
the boarding of pets on the site, the maintaining of
pens or cages outside of the building or the
operating so as to cause an offensive
odor or noise.
ww. Photographic supplies and processing of film and
prints
xx. Seat cover, upholstery or drapery shop
yy. Television and radio stations
zz. Wholesale distribution, wholesale office and show
rooms
Subdivision 2. Conditional Uses. No structure or land
shall be used for the following uses except by conditional
use permit.
a. Motor fuel stations subject to the performance
standards as specified in Section 9-14, Subd. 17,
of this code.
b. Drive-in establishments subject to the performance
. standards Section 9-14, Subd. 14, of this code.
59
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 9-10.01
c. Those uses permitted in Subdivision 1 of Section
9-9.01.
d. Broadcast and telecommunications transmission tower
facilities.
e. Advertising signs.
f. Commercial auto repair and used car sales.
g. Boat and marine sales when conducted entirely within
a building.
h. Building material yard, provided it is conducted
entirely within an enclosed structure.
i. Car wash establishments.
j. Commercial greenhouse provided all outside storage is
fenced in such a manner so as to screen the stored
material from view when observed from the public street
and adjacent residential areas.
k. Hotels, motor hotels and motels, provided the site
shall contain not less than six hundred (600) square feet
• of lot area per unit.
1. Optical and jewelry manufacturing.
m. Armories, convention halls, sports arenas and
stadiums, bowling gymnasiums, Y,M.C.A., Y.W.C.A., night
clubs.
n. .Veterinarian offices and small animal hospitals
provided there shall be no boarding of animals, except
for hospitalization, on the site nor the placement of
cages or pens outside of the building.
o. Retail liquor store.
p. Billiard/pool hall, game arcades, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The operation of such establishments shall
not negatively impact the reasonable peace and
quiet of surrounding residential areas.
2. Hours of operation shal be limited to 10 a.m.
to 12 midnight. All applicable curfews will be
enforced on the premises.
60
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 9-10.01
3. Implementation of a security plan, which must
• be approved by the local law enforcement official,
will be required. The security plan shall include
provisions for the following; adequate security
lighting, controlling loitering and any disorderly
behavior within the building, in the parking lot
or anywhere else on the premises; prohibiting the
sale, use or possession of alcohol or any other
controlled substance without a prescription.
4. Rear door will serve as an emergency exit only.
5. Adequate supervision will be required including
a minimum of two adult employees on the premises
during all hours of operation until closing.
Additional supervisory and/or security personnel may
be required at the city council's discretion.
6. No person shall establish, maintain or operate
an amusement establishment as defined in this
ordinance without a license issued by the city.
7. Compliance with all other applicable provisions
of the Falcon Heights city ordinances shall be
required.
8. Other conditions, as deemed appropriate by the
. city council, may be applied in response to site
specific conditions at the time the conditional use
permit is issued. Violation of any of the above
stated conditions or any other conditions included
as part of the approved conditional use permit shall
be deemed ample grounds for revocation of the
permit.
9. The conditional use permit shall terminate upon
a change in amusement establishment ownership and/or
the closing of the amusement establishment..
Other retail uses of a similar nature may be added to the
above list of conditional uses upon request and approval
by the Planning Commission and the Council.
•
61
• PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 9-10.01
Subdivision 3. Permitted Accessory Uses. Any use permitted
in Part 8 Subdivision 2 and as regulated therein. The
following additional uses shall also be permitted accessory
uses.
a. Accessory structures other than private garages as
regulated herein. The design and placement of the
accessory buildings must be approved by the City Council
as being in harmony with the surrounding business
district after review and recommendation by the Plan-
ning Commission.
b. Essential service structures, provided no building
shall be located within thirty (30) feet of an abutting
lot in an "R" District. The placement of the essential
service structure must be approved by the City Council as
being in harmony with the surrounding business district
after review and recommendation by the Plan-
ning Commission.
• Subdivision 4. Height and Yard Requirements.
a. No structure or building shall exceed three (3)
stories or thirty-five (35) feet in height whichever is
the greater except as provided for in 9-2.07.
b. A side yard abutting on a street shall not be less
than thirty (30) feet and when abutting a lot in an "R"
District shall not be less than forty (40) feet.
However, no side yard shall be required when adjacent to
a party wall, subject to the regulations of 9-2.05.
c. Rear yard requirements may be reduced to ten (10)
feet at alley lines.
d. The following minimum requirements shall be observed
subject to the additional requirements, exceptions and
modifications as set forth in this Section and Section
9-2.05.
Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard
30' 10' 20'
•
62
•
Meeting Date: 9/28/92
Agenda Item 1
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Request for a variance in §9-4.01[4](c) of
the zoning code, the sideyard setback, at
1603 Northrop Street.
SUBMITTED BY: Andy and Carolyn Collins, Property Owners
REVIEWED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Administrator acting as planner
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
The Collins' are proposing to build an attached two car garage by
adding an additional 14 feet of width to the existing 11.95 foot
garage on the northwest side of their house. The area of the
proposed garage is 521 square feet. The northwest corner of the
garage addition will come within 2.68 feet of the adjacent
sideyard property line rather than within the 5 feet required by
the zoning code. Therefore, a variance of 2.32 feet is
necessary. (The city required a survey of the property line by a
registered surveyor to accurately determine setbacks, therefore,
measurements appears in hundredths.) (See attachment B)
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Site Plan
B - Staff Report
C - Reasons for granting a variance
ACTION REQUESTED:
Discuss and approve the request for a variance of 2.32 feet in
the rear ten feet of the garage addition of the sideyard setback
at 1603 Northrop Street.
• 24 September 1992 1-B
MEMO
TO: Planning Commissioners
FROM: Susan Hoyt, City Administrator
RE: Request for a variance in the sideyard setback requirement
for 1603 Northrop Street
Request
The Collins are proposing to build an attached two car garage by
adding an additional 14 feet of width to the existing 11.68 foot
garage on the northwest side of their house. The area of the
proposed garage is 516 square feet. The northwest corner of the
garage addition will come within 2.68 feet of the adjacent
sideyard property line rather than within the 5 feet required by
the zoning code. Therefore, a variance of 2.32 feet is
necessary. (The city required a survey of the property line by a
registered surveyor to accurately determine setbacks, therefore,
measurements appears in hundredths.) (See attachment B)
Staff review
Garaae Dimensions
Staff reviewed the request for a variance and looked for
alternatives to a variance for the garage addition. Given the
location of the house on the lot, the only alternative to the
variance limits the extension of the garage to 11.68 ft.
Garage Dimensions Area
W/O Variance 23.63 ft. X 20.11 ft. = 475.20.sq. ft.
With Variance 25.95 ft. X 20.11 ft. = 521.85 sq. ft.
Standard 2 1/2 24 ft. X 24 ft. = 576 sq. ft.
car garage
Although the 23.6 foot width is adequate for a two and a half car
garage, the total area is less than the standard garage that the
zoning code typically accommodates because the garage length
remains the same (20 ft.) to keep within the existing lines of
the house and to avoid reworking the rear of the original garage.
Lot Shape
The garage addition is proposed 2.68 feet from the property line
for the rear part of the structure only due to the pie shape of
. the lot. The sideyard requirement of 5 feet should be met in the
first half of the structure. And, therefore a variance is needed
only for the rear 10 feet of the structure, with the maximum
• variance being in the northwest corner of the addition for 2.32
ft.
Adiacent structures/style
The addition will parallel a garage on the neighbor's property
and be several feet from the adjacent structure (see Attachment
C). The garage addition will keep the same style and roof line as
the existing one car garage.
Neighbor's comments
The neighboring property owners, Drs. O'Leary, at 2252 Folwell
verbally stated they did not object to the granting of a variance
for this addition.
Staff recommendation
Staff recommends the granting of a variance of 2.32 feet in the
rear ten feet of the addition in the sideyard setback §9-4.01 [4)
(c) of the zoning code for the following reasons:
• It's a reasonable way to accommodate the off-street
parking and storage space provided by a two and a half
• car garage.
• Over the past two years the city revised the zoning
code to accommodate garages with 576 sq, ft. of storage
area on the city's smallest lots, and, therefore, it is
reasonable to grant additional area.
• The shape of the lot requires a smaller setback in the
rear to make the addition possible.
• The proposed addition does not adversely impact the
neighboring property owner's property.
• The request meets the conditions for granting a
variance, specifically (c) property enjoyment and (g)
shape of lot (see Attachment D).
0
0
x
O
6`
a
W
--~ ,
. ~,
a ~ 1
~ ~ J
~, ~ ~ } c
~~ o
~ ~ ~~ _ ~
x7 N (~
~bQQ 6 c ~ \ ~
r- ~
~. D d ~
,ti`s ~~-~ - ~~i`
-~
~ ,^ - ~ ~` .
~~ '4 ~ o ~'
~~
~ r
O ~ ~ ~ ~
,~ .
~ ,~. .
~ ~i - ~ ~ :~
n ~ _ ~
~ y
7s r~
~U ~
~"_...~ O
•
Meeting Date: 9/28/92
Agenda Item 3
ITEM: Review and approve the proposed 1993 five year capital
improvement program (CIP)
SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Administrator
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
State statute and good planning practices require that the
planning commission review the city's capital improvement program
to determine if it is in keeping with the city's plans. The
proposed 5 year CIP is attached for review and comment.
Staff will go over the CIP at the meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - 5 year CIP (1993. - 1998)
RECOMMENDATION:
Review, comment and adopt the 1993 CIP.
.3A
CAPITAL IHPROVEHENTS PROGRAH
s a a a s s s s a s s a s s s a a a s s a a s s a s s s s a s s a a a s s s a a a a s s s s s a s s s a s a s
The Capital Improvements Program is a planning document
which defines and sets priorities for the community's
capital ~ojects, usually for a five year period with
annual updates. It usually includes text, maps, tables
of projects, costs by year, and a proposed method for
project financing.
This plan is intended to ensure that improvements are
made to the community on an equitable basis and that
utility projects precede street projects, etc. The
capital improvements plan may be adopted after holding
public hearings which give residents an opportunity to
gain a better understanding of the improvement process
and time to anticipate improvements and investments in
their area.
The plan is not a final commitment to projects, and each
project requires additional approval by the governing
body prior to proceeding. The plan assists the governing
body in determining what projects to commit to on an
• annual basis and also prepare bonding documents if
needed.
The Capital Improvements Program is a responsible part of
the planning process because it places fiscal
responsibility on goals and helps the community develop
at a reasonable and affordable rate.
The Capital Improvements Program should reflect the goals
and plans of the Comprehensive Plan and the community
needs reflected in the Overall Economic Development
Program or Community Needs analysis.
n
U
RAMMf1A A~OCJATiOM
L
47
•
1993 FI VE_ YEAR
~ CAPITAL IMPR
OVEMENT PLAN
~J
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
•
ACTIVITY: Five Year Capital Improvement Plan
1993 BUDGET
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION: Describe and plan for current and future capital
expenditures and their financing sources.
ANALYSIS~COMMENTS: This section is divided into five sections. They
are: Administration, Fire & Rescue, Public Works, Park & Recreation, and
Street Projects.
The graph below demonstrates that the major capital improvements will be
to replace the city's aging infrastructure and recreation facilities.
Source: City of Falcon Heights 1993 Budget Document
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
1993 .BUDGET
.DEPARTMENT: Administration
ACTIVITY: Five Year Capital Improvement Plan
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION: Administration section provides for capital
expenditures in and around city hall
ANALYSIS/COMMENTS: The 1993 planned expenditures are for replacement of
existing equipment and include:
• The city fax machine will be six years old and technological
advances have made the current fax obsolete.
• The city has been replacing office chairs over the last three
years. This money is to replace the remaining three office chairs.
• The replacement of the IBM XT computer with a faster more
efficient computer.
• The improvement and replacement of the loud speaker system in the
council chambers. This will improve the sound within the council
chambers as well as on cable TV.
• The purchase of audio equipment which will allow the city
• to make better us of its cable network and inform the city
residents of city business.
• Replacement audio visual aids such as slide projector and easel.
• Replacement of council folding tables and chairs.
• Replacement of the old voting booths with new lightweight modern
booths.
• Remodeling of .the entryway in city hall.
These improvements will have little or no cost impact on future
operations other than to make set-up for elections easier and less time
consuming.
1993 THRU 1997 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
• GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
CAPITAL ITEMS
1993
1994
----
1995 1996
--------- -
1997 FUTURE
NEEDS
TOTAL
OFFICE AREA: -------- --------- ---------
-----------
computers 7 000
'
printers
800 51,000
software 5800
copier
fax machine
1,500
9,000
10,000 50
519,000
telephone system 51,500
office chairs
2,000 15,000 515,000
desks/partitions
3
000 52,000
filing system
2,000 , 53,000
carpenting/curtains
20 000 52,000
520,000
KITCHEN AREA:
stove
microwave
50
refigerator 50
table/chairs 1,000 51,000
cabinets/counters 1,000 51,000
5,000 55,000
MEETING AREA:
a.v.
cable equipment 5,000
1 000
'
2,000
57,000
miscellaneous
675 51,000
table/chairs
• carpenting/curtains
2,000
8,000 5675
510,000
12 000
remodeling
20,000
10
000 512,000
, 530,000
MISCELLANEOUS:
voting booths 5,500
voting machines
1,000
16,000 55,500
517
000
building sign 500 ,
roof
10
000 5500
remodeling
1 500 , 510,000
-
-------- --------- 51,500
70TAL CAPITAL ITEMS
522,175
572,800 --
511,500 513,000 -------
51,000
546,000
5166,475
FUNDING SOURCES:
GENERAL CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT FUND 22,175 72,800 11,500 13,000 1,000 45,500 5165,975
SALVAGE VALUE
500 5500
CAPITAL NOTES/BONDS
50
OTHER SOURES
50
TOTAL FINANCING -
522,775 ------- --
572,800 ------- --------- --
511,500 513,000 ------- --
51,000 -------
546,000
5166,475
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
1993 BUDGET
• DEPARTMENT: Public Safety Improvements
ACTIVITY: Five Year Capital Improvement Plan
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION: This section provides capital expenditures of the
volunteer fire department.
ANALYSIS/COMMENTS: All planned purchases for 1993 are for replacement of
old equipment. This replacement includes:
• backboard stretchers for both ambulances;,
• the yearly ongoing replacement of the self-contained breathing
apparatus (SCBA);
• the first year of a four year replacement plan for radio pagers
and packsets (ten pagers for three years and one packset for four
years);
• miscellaneous equipment such as fire boots, coats, helmets, etc.
The replacement of these items will have little impact on future
expenditures. They will help the city to retain its ISO rating in the
future.
n
LJ
•
• PUBLIC SAFETY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
FUTURE
CAPITAL ITEMS
------ - 1993
-------- - 1994
-------- - 1995
------- 1996 1997 NEEDS TOTAL
PUMPER/HOSE TRUCK - - -------- - -------- - -------- -
300,000 ----------
5300,000
EQUIPMENT
LADDER/TELASQUIRT 50
EQUIPMENT 50
90 AMBULANCE
80,000 50
580,000
EQUIPMENT 750 12,500 513,250
79 AMBULANCE
EQUIPMENT
350
12,500 50
512,850
OTHER EQUIPMENT:
hoses 0 7,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 55,000
scba 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 518,000
pagers/pack sets 6,000 6,000 5,250 750 518,000
miscellaneous 3,000 .7,100 4,500 4,500 4,500 16,500 540,100
civil defense siren 10,000 510,000
FIRE HALL:
remodeling
furniture 50
kitchen equipment 50
TOTAL CAPITAL ITEMS
• FUNDING SOURCES:
-------------------
PUBLIC SAFETY CAPIT.
IMPROVEMENT FUND
RESCUE SERVICE FUND
CAPITAL NOTES/BONDS
SALVAGE VALUE
DONATIONS
OTHER SOURCES
TOTAL FINANCING
SO
SO
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
513,700 530,200 526,850 59,850 59,100 5407,500 5497,200
11,850 16,950 14,350 9,850 9,100 327,500 5389,600
1,850 13,250 12,500 80,000 5107,600
50
50
50
50
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
513,700 530,200 526,850 59,850 59,100 5407,500 5497,200
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
1993 BUDGET
• DEPARTMENT: Public Works
ACTIVITY: Five Year Capital Improvement Plan
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION: The Public Works section is for equipment which is
used in the area infrastructure maintenance.
ANALYSIS/COMMENTS: 1993 expenditures include:
• replacement of the radio equipment which was purchased in the
early '80's. The city is currently having problems with the
system in that the radios pick up other signals;
• a new item to improve the Public~Works storage area. This area is
currently an older privacy type fencing which is unsecured. This
would be improved both aesthetically and in security;
• the purchase of a tripod & harness for the lowering of public
works personnel into confined spaces such as manholes;
• replacement of the city limit signs which have the old city logo
and population data on them.
The storage improvement would have some time impact on the Public Works
• department. Public Works would have to spend time reorganizing and
cleaning up the Public Works area. This is a one time time-constraint
and is believed to have little impact on the future operating budget.
•
PUBLIC uORKS
FUTURE
CAPITAL ITEMS
--------- 1993
--------- 1994
--------- 1995
------- 1996 1997 NEEDS TOTAL
HALF TON PICK UP -- --------- --------- --------- -----------
TRUCK W/PLOD 20,000 $20,000
1 TON TRUCK 25,000 $25,000
SEWER JETTER 20,000 $20,000
GENERATOR 10,000 $10,000
RADIO EQUIPMENT 6,000 $6,000
TRI-POD & HARNESS 3,500 $3,500
PORTABLE GENERATOR 3,000 $3,000
NUMATIC HAMMER 2,000 $2,000
STORAGE/REAR BLDG.
IMPROVEMENTS 28,000 $28,000
CITY SIGNS 1,000 $1,000
ROOF REPAIR 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 30,000 $35,000
TOTAL CAPITAL ITEMS --------- -
$39,500 -------- -
$6,000 -------- -
$26,000 -------- -
$21,000 -------- -
51,000 --------
$60,000
$153,500
FUNDING SOURCES
-----------
--------
PUBLIC uORKS CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT FUND 36,000 6,000 13,000 21,000 1,000 40,000 $117,000
SANITARY SEWER FUND 3,500 7,500 10,000 $21,000
STORM SEDER FUND 5,500 10,000 $15,500
SALVAGE
VALUE
, $U
BONDING/OTHER
$0
-
TOTAL FINANCING -------- --
$39,500 ------- -
$6,000 -------- -
$26,000 -------- --
$21,000 ------- -
$1,000 -------- --
$60,000 ---------
$153,500
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
1993 BUDGET
DEPARTMENT: Park and Recreation
ACTIVITY: Five Year Capital Improvement Plan
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION: This section provides planned improvements to the
city parks system.
ANALYSIS/COMMENTS: 1993 expenditures include maintenance items such as
resurfacing tennis courts, ballfield rehabilitation and some major
improvements to the University Grove park.
These improvements will require additional time for maintenance by the
public works staff in the future.
Note: Any capital improvements planned for Falcon Heights school will be
coordinated with Independent School District 623 which owns and operates
the school facilities.
PARK and RECREATION
CAPITAL ITEMS
COMMUNITY PARK:
rink flooding improv
tennis court lights
play equipment
landscaping
signage
parking Lot improv.
volleyball sand pit
trail rehab
vita course improv.
basketball court imp
ballfield rehab
bleachers
ice rink lights
play area shelter
TOTAL COMMUNITY PARK
CURTISS FIELD:
landscaping
ballfield rehab
ice rink improv
fence replacement
play equipment
parking lot improv.
TOTAL CURTISS FIELD
FUTURE
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 NEEDS TOTAL
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
SO
3,000 53,000
50
800 1,000 1,000 1,000 $3,800
2,500 52,500
10,000 510,000
3,000 53,000
6,000 56,000
10,000 510,000
6,000 15,000 521,000
SO
1,200 51,200
10,000 510,000
--------- -
-------- --------- --------- --- SO
------ -
532,300
520,000 51,000 52,200 -------- -----------
SO 515,000 570,500
500 500 51,000
1,500 51,500
5,000 55,000
2,000 10,000 512,000
SO
SO
53,500 5500 55,500 510,000 SO SO 519,500
UNIVERSITY GROVE:
landscaping 50
ice rink improv
park improvements 70,000 50
• play equipment 570,000
50
parking lot improv. SO
TOTAL UNIVERS. GROVE 570,000 $0 SO 50 50 50 570,000
FALCON HEIGHTS SCHOOL:
ice rink improv
ballfield rehab
miscellaneous improv
TOTAL F. H. SCHOOL
TRAIL SYSTEM IMPROV.
PARK MAINTENANCE:
snow blower
riding mowers
tractor
TOTAL PARK MAINT.
50
5,000 55,000
2,000 10,000 50,000 562,000
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
57,000 510,000 550,000 SO 50 50 567,000
40,000 100,000 5140,000
3,000 53,000
4,000 54,000
50
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
53,000 50 54,000 50 SO 50 57,000 ,
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
TOTAL CAPITAL ITEMS 5115,800 570,500 560,500 512,200 50 5115,000 5374,000
FUNDING SOURCES
-------------------
PARK & RECREATION
CAPITAL FUND 115,800 30,500 60,500 12,200 115,000 5334,000
SALVAGE VALUE
DONATIONS/GRANTS
• INFRASTRUCTURE
TOTAL FINANCING
50
SO
40,000
540,000
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
5115,800 570,500 560,500 512,200 50 5115,000 5374,000
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
1993 BUDGET
ACTIVITY: Street Project Five Year Capital Improvement Plan
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION: The Street Projects section provides the planned
reconstruction of the city's infrastructure.
ANALYSISjCOMMENTS: 1993 will be the second year of the four year street
improvement plan.
The street projects will effect the city's park maintenance operating
budget in the form of maintaining, cleaning and removing snow from the
non-motorized pathways. -Also starting in 1994 when sealcoating projects
increase for maintenance of streets involved in the improvement plan.
.,
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
CAPITAL ITEMS
1993
---------
1994
---------
1995 1996
--------- FUTURE
1997 NEEDS TOTAL
SEALCOATING
13,125
20,000 ---------
20,000 20,000 --------- --------- -----------
20,000 20,000 5113,125
ALLEY REPLACEMENT 112,500 112,500 5225,000
AUTUMN, SUMMER,
and PRIOR 132,615 5132,615
UNIVERSITY GROVE
AREA 236,250 5236,250
PASCAL, LARPENTEUR
TO ROSELAWN 160,000 5160,000
HOL70N, LARPENTEUR
TO ROSELAWN 160,000 5160,000
FOWELL AVE. OVERLAY 21,000 521,000
RUGGLES,
HOLTON TO HAMLINE
ALBERT & SHELDON,
RUGGLES TO ROSELAWN 35,000 535,000
LARPENTEUR AVE.
WEST CITY LIMITS
. TO SNELIING 148,000 5148,000
SNELLING TO HAMLINE 133,000 5133,000
CLEVELAND AVE.
--------- -
-------- -
-------- -- 50
TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS
5402,990
5656,000 ------- -
5132,500 5132,500 -------- --------- -----------
520,000 520,000 51,363,990
FUNDING SOURCES
----------
---------
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
170,971
280,545
5451,516
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 170,972 265,545 112,500 112,500 5661,517
MSA FUNDS
50
GENERAL FUND 13,125 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 5113,125
STORM SEWER FUND 47,922 68,910 5116,832
SANITARY SEWER FUND
50
WATER FUND 21,000 521,000
BONDING/OTHER
50
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
TOTAL FINANCING 5402,990 5656,000 5132,500 5132,500 520,000 520,000 51,363,990