HomeMy WebLinkAboutPCAgenda_92Mar30PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
March 30, 1992
7:30 p.m.
A. CALL TO ORDER:
B. ROLL CALL: Lee Barry Len Boche Ed Finegan
Marie Furton Steve Huso Carolyn Nestingen
Ken Salzberg
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 24, 1992
D. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
E. PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR
A VETERINARY CLINIC AT 1553 WEST LARPENTEUR AVENUE
F. REPORTS, REQUESTS, RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Update on Comprehensive Plan
G. STAFF UPDATE:
1. Cleveland Avenue Reconstruction
2. Rottlund Home Development
3. Falcon Heights/Roseville Cooperative Study
4. Other
H. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS
I. ADJOURN
MINUTES
REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
February 24, 1992
7:30 p.m.
PRESENT: ABSENT: ALSO PRESENT:
Lee Barry Ed Finegan Susan Hoyt,Administrator
Len Boche Carolyn Nestingen acting as planner
Marie Furton Ken Salzberg Paul Ciernia, Council Member
Steve Huso
Meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Lee Barry, Chair.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The minutes of the January 27, 1992 meeting was unanimously
approved as written.
REPORTS REOUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Request for a variance from 69-2 04(1)(c) of the zoning code
by M_ r Raymond Kinney 1447 W. Idaho St.
Mr. Kinney requested the commission approve a 1/2 foot
sideyard variance in order to construct a new garage, 21 ft.
by 22 ft. The new garage would be located in the same
position from the side lot line as the current garage which
is 4 1/2 ft. from the side lot line rather than 5 ft. as the
code requires. If the variance were granted, a two car
garage could be built without requiring relandscaping his
rear yard. Mr. Kinney's neighbors expressed no objection to
the request.
Staff recommended the variance request be granted as it
meets the requirements of the zoning code and would not
substantially diminish or impair property values in the
area.
Boche moved to grant the variance request, and it was
unanimously approved by the commission.
2. Report on the city's 1992 community development block grant
application for blight elimination.
The commission discussed the city's application of a
$191,550 grant of CDBG money to Ramsey County on February
14, 1992. The grant was requested for the clearance of 2061
Larpenteur, to relandscape the property and to relocate the
present residents. Hoyt explained the property is in
substandard condition and is not compatible with the current
zoning code. The grant is a very competitive grant and
Falcon Heights would be competing with all of suburban
Ramsey County, so if the grant is denied, other options may
have to be considered.
3. Regional transit plan review at council workshop 3/11/92
Staff invited all commission members to attend the city
council workshop. Councilmember Sam Jacobs, MTC manager and
representative to the Regional Transit Board, will be
discussing the new regional transit plan. This plan
represents a shift in the approach to regional transit
planning.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:50.
Susan Hoyt, Administrator/Planner
Dee Swenson, Recording Secretary
•
Meeting Date: 3/30/92
Agenda Item E-1
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Public hearing on a request for a conditional
use permit to operate a veterinary clinic at
1553 West Larpenteur Avenue in a B-2 zone
SUBMITTED BY: Dr. Douglas LeMay, DVM, proposed tenant
REVIEWED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Administrator acting as planner
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
Dr. LeMay is proposing to operate a veterinary clinic at 1553 West
Larpenteur Avenue in Bullseye Shopping Center (see attachment A).
The use is not a permitted use, but is a conditional use in § 9-
10.01[2](n) of the zoning code. A conditional use goes with the
property, not with the proprietor. The conditional use must be
approved if all the conditions governing it are met (see attachment
B) .
The staff report describes the key items that must be met and the
proposed conditions for granting this permit.
ATTACHMENT:
A. Description of proposed veterinary clinic
B. Conditions governing approval of a conditional use permit
C. Staff report
ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Hold public hearing on conditional use permit.
2. Discuss permit application and proposed conditions.
3. Approve permit with conditions.
r
.7
~J
Planning Commission
i~:arch 5, 1992
Re: Planned Veterinary Hospital at 15;3 ~. I.arpenteur.
The planned Veterinary Hospital will be owned and operated
by Douglas G. I,eVay DVi~~i. Dr. LeMay has lived in the Roseville-
Falcon Heights area for over 28 years and has been practicing
veterinary medicine in the metro area for over 4 years.
A recent market study has shover, that the area has a need
for and could support an additional veterinarian. The ~larned
Hospital will be 2 „ 00 sq. ft. and located ir. the Bullseye
Shopping Center.
There are several aspects of a Veterinary i-:ospital that
need to be considered:
1. Employees: The Hospital will be staffed with 2~ -
6 employees. The staff would be as
follows:
Veterinarians 1 - 2
Technicians 12 - 2
Receptionists - 1~
_ Kennel Titiorkers - ~
2~ - b
i•
2. Hours: M-F 7:30 am - 6:00 pm
Sat. 8:00 am - 12:00 pm
Emergency calls as needed
•
•
3. Parking: Two spaces will be reserved fcr
Hospital paring. There are sever, (7)
:no re spaces ir. front of the Hospital
and approximately fifty-five (55) spaces
for the entire center.ir+orkins or. ar.
appointment basis trere should be r.o
more than 3-4 client cars at the
Hospital at ore time.
4. Noise: This is the primary corcerr. in a
Veterinary Hospital. To recuce noise
to the ad,;acent business' s the commor.
walls will be sourdprccfed up to the
roof level. In additior, the Kerr.ei area
and exam-rooms will also have additional
soundproofing in the interior walls.
5. Odors: To control odors both the ker,r.el and Darx
Room will have seperate exhaust fans.
E. Boarding: There will be no boarding at the Hospital.
Gnly hospitalized, recovering, or groomed
pets will stay in the Hospital. The length
of stay depends on t'r.e conditior, of t'r.e pet.
Current plans would allow for a maximum of
fourteen (14) pets as follows: 3 Large,
. 4 Medium, 7 Small.
r
7. Biological 'paste: Tr,ere are r,o regulations pertaining
to tris waste. Current standards are to
dispose of the waste ir, tr,e trash. Tr,e
contractor is presently considering if a
flushing system could be installed in the
runs.
~. Haaardous ~tiaste: State: regulates the disposal of
sharps. X11 sharps will be stored
ir, a regulation container and
transported off premise ;:y a
• licensed transporter.
County: regulates used developing
chemicals. Current projected
levels of use would be under the
regulated levels. A scavenger
system is available to process the
chemicals before disposal if
needed.
9. itadiatior,: The ~-ray room will be set up according tc
State guidelines (Chapter 4730. r'or added
protection tre room will also be lined with
• 1/32" lead. The State regulations will be
followed concerning the equipment, testing,
exposure to x-rays, and maintenance.
10. Grooming: A seperate area for grooming will be
established. Grooming will be done on
a limited basis - probably 2-3 days a
week in the morning hours. Tre pets will
only stay in t're ~~ospital on t'rle clay they
are groomed.
If you have any further questions or concerns please contact
Dr. Louglas G. I,ei~iay at 347-0512 or 488-7y2b. Thank You.
~rEerely,
D~elugla G . LeMa~VM
•
-~
7
~ ~
~~
-, .~
U 005`0£ 005`Z£
~j ~ anuany Su~iaus g
v ~ ~
Li
~•~
~~
V
1
i--~
y~
i--+
~;
~~
3
~~.
U
~aa.~S ~uo~
--
1
i ~
i t
a
p~o~ a~~~uoi~ /
anuan~ ~uTjjaus •~
Q~
L--.
~r
1 r
CCi
r
~ c
~ ~
V~~
G "
rte,, ~= y
Cy a> ~
.~
.~
>~~
_¢
~~~~~
=o~
ao~~
~ ~ ~ M
3 0 ~_ ~~
M ~ u
~J
~~
^ll
~1J
V ~
C
~..1
. r..i ~ ~_
~•~
O '~ ~
cn
~~
Nom:
~~~
~ M
M •--
~ `~'
~ z
S~ce ~je ~r-y
G~l~ s, ~ e re cf
~ ~
Lam.. y
Q~
~ j
'~
G~ ,a
V1 ..r
VO
ov;v-,
~~~
o ,-, ..~
N •-- M
c~ ~
Q ~
C ~
w ~¢
u.~E=
SUITE 1533
China Town
2,742.10 sq.ft
SUITE 1537 ~
Vacant
1,154.17 sq.ft
SUITE 1539
Hoover
1,154.17 sq.ft
su1TE 1x41
Sports Injury
1,154.17 sq.ft
SUITE 1543
Vacant
1,154.17 sq.ft
SUI'T'E 1545
Paul Revere Pizza
1,154.17 sq.ft
SUITE 1547
Focus 1 Hr.
678.37 sq.ft
SUITE 1549
Dentists
1,560.77 sq.ft
SUITE 1553
Vacant
2,308.34 sq.ft
SUITE 1555
Fantastic Sam
1,154.17 sq.ft
SUITE 1557B
Kitchens Direct
1,302.41 sq.ft
SUITE 1557
J's Liquor
2,205 sq.ft
SUITE 1559
Vacant
2,810 sq.ft
1
t~
i
u
v
a
`~
`~
'-]
I
U
L__
r.
I
v
:`
~~
,,
C
r
~ o
~ ~t
o ~~
V
~ o
~ ~ w
~ C_
>~
~ c~~~
~ o ~,.-~
~ ~ ~
3`n ~~
Fo~~
~--+ ~
~ ~
r4.J ~
v ~ ~
~ :~
~~ O
.~ ~ ~
~ ~~~
~ ~
~-+
~ ~
_~
~t~ •~
~ ` ~
M O
MM M ,-.
N-i ~ ~
__ ____ i
~ _ i
-~,
.~~
,x
_ti
O
~ -
•
•
r~
1992
Generator
Infectious Waste Management Plan
Biennial Renewal
`~, v .•=,lplL VAR •. .~,
~~, 6 ~'~ ii ~ • ~
w° ~_
_ ' % •:~
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Environmental Health D~v~s~on
Infectious Waste Control Unit
1992
GENERATOR'S INFECTIOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
A person may prepare a common management plan for all generating facilities owned and operated by the
person. !f a single plan is prepared to cover multiple facilities, the plan must identify common policy and
procedures for the facilities and any management procedures that are facility specific. The plan must identify
each generating facility covered by the plan (Minn. Stat. § 116.79 subd. 1 [a]).
List all generating facilities covered by this plan.
1~~'me. Ver~~~ nary/ ~'lV1 c2. t-/~.~r2 1uC, 1 ~ t/ ~ bc' T in..~,. .
~~se..,1(e iyJ~., ~ ~ I ~ 3 a so ~aEe e,-Pr f't,P ~~ ~ ~ •'F
List all nongenerating facilities owned and operated by the generator (i.e., billing offices, nonembalming
mortuaries).
Person responsible for the managemerrt of infectious waste~~S ~ ~~~ ~ Vt~l
Phone number ( / 1 Z ) 3Y7 - 07 /Z
The management plan must describe, to the extent the information is applicable to the facility (Minn. Scat.
§ 116.79, subd. 1 [b]):
The type of infectious waste and pathological waste that the person generates or handles (Minn. Stat § 116.79,
subd. 1 [b][1]);
1. Type of waste generated: (check all that apply)
[ ]Laboratory WasteSharps
[ ]Blood [ J Research Animal Waste
[ ]Regulated Body Fluids [ ]Pathological Waste
The segregation, packaging, labeling, collection, storage, and transportation procedures for the infectious
waste or pathological waste that will be followed. (Minn. Stat. § 116.79, subd. 1 [bj [2])
Describe what activities, programs and locations at and associated with the facility generate infectious or
naifinlnniral waaial
2. Segregation. All untreated infectious waste must be segregated from other waste material at its point of
generation and maintained in separate packaging throughout collection, storage, and transport.
3. Packaging. Infectious waste must be packaged, contained, and transported in a manner that prevents
release of the waste material (Minn. Stat. § 116.78, subd. 1).
Sharps must be placed in puncture-resistant containers (Minn. Stat. § 116.78, subd. a).
t.. ~....L.......~•
4. Labeling. All bags, boxes, and other containers used to collect, transport, or store infectious waste
must be clearly labeled with a biohazard symbol or with the words 'infectious waste' written in letters no
less than one inch in height (Minn. Scat. § 116.78, subd. 2).
Describe the facility's procedure for labeling:
rt Ta
5. Collection. Containers which have been in direct contact with infectious waste must be disinfected prior
to reuse. -
Infeciious waste may not be compacted or maed with other waste materials prior to incineration or
disposal. Compaction is acceptable only if ft is part of an infectious waste system, approved by thz
commissioner of health or the commissioner of the pollution control agency, that is designed to prevent
exposure during storage, transportation, and disposal (Minn. Stat. § 116.78, subd. 3 and subd. 7).
Describe the facility's procedure for the callectiort of infectious and pathological waste within the
facility: L
Leo tln0 lar~ Prir,lrn,. G.,,,1 /,~GG~~G._4 ~nr a s~~G/ds r~CrL
2
rlncrriho tha tacflitv's arocedure for segregation: (~ _
- g, ~ Storage. Infectious and pathological waste must be stored in a specially designated area that is
designed to prevent the entry of vermin and that prevents access by unauthorized persons (Minn. Stai. §
116.78, subd. 6).
7. Decontamination and disposal on-site. The management plan must identify any
method of decontamination of infectious or pathological waste that takes place on-site
(Minn. Slat. § 116.79, subd. 1 [b][3]).
Decontamination method:
• The management plan must identify the method used for any on-site disposal (Minn.
Scat. § 116.79, subd. 1 [b] [3J).
Disposal method: / .
Of' R r Gu 6~e
8. Incineration on-site. A person who incinerates on-site must submit an attachment to the generator's
management plan detailing the incinerating operation (Minn. Stat. § 116.79 subd. 4 (a]).
Do you incinerate on-site? [ ]Yes ~ No
If yes, attach a copy of the management plan submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to
this management plan.
3
Describe the facility procedure for storing infectious and pathological waste:
g• _ Transporters and off-site disposal. The management plan must identify the transporters and disposal
facilities that will be used for the Infectious waste (Minn. Stat. $ 116.79, subd. 1 [bJ[4J).
Complete the appropriate information:
[ ]Self transported
[ 1) Commercial transporter
J Transported by another generator
Name c~,ca~ asre hv~
Address RR 7 S~oa N Q~~r~e Sv, ~e u City S~. ~ ~ 1 State ~~
Phone Number (~O/Z 17 7 7 - 73 ~ 7 Contact Person iq ~~ G/e~, ^
Other transporters or storage facilities
Name
Address City State
Phone Number ~ 1 - Contact Person
Disposal facility
Name
Address COY.
State
Phone Number L .) - Contact Person
Contingency system
10. Training program. The management plan must identify the seeps that will be taken to minimize the
exposure of employees to infectious agents throughout the process of disposing of infectious or
pathological wastes (Minn. Scat § 116.79, subd. 1 [b] [5]).
Do you provide annual Employee Right-To-Know training?
Date Iasi offered
[ J Yes [~J No
4
i
i k
~j-~..
Cluantity. To the extent applicable to the facility, management plans must be accompanied by a
statement of the quantity of infectious and pathological waste generated, decontaminated, stored,
incinerated, or disposed of at the facility during the previous two-year period. Quantities must be
reported in gallons or pounds. (Minn. Stat. § 116.79, subd. 1 [d])
Complete the following information for each generating tacility stating whether
gallons or pounds:
Generated (total)
Decontaminated on-site
Disposed of {sewered)
Stored on-site
(maximum at any one time)
Incinerated on-site
Disposed of
(transported off-site)
•
•
Infectious Waste pathological Waste ~harn~
_____ f ~t
~- _1.---
_~ --~
_~- f ~r
Phone Number
_~/~/ `~/
Date
5
Title
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 9-15.0
Names and addresses of the owners of all property
(9) rt as contained in the current
abutting the sub~eet prope Y~
real estate tax rolls, including properly located across the
street, avenue or alley from the subject property.
ubdivision 3. Hearing. The City Council or Planning Commission shall
S '
hold a public hearing within thirty (30) days of the date of filing e
application, or at the next regularly scheduled meeting after said
thirty (3~) days, after publishing notice of such hearing in the
official newspaper and sending ~oKnersoatcleastttene(1)sdaysiprior to
application as abutting property _.
the date of the hearing.
~.~,~,,~~ a. General and Special Requirements: The Planniang~sommianssi~onni~zesr
G~ Council shall consider to what extent the app
~~, possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional use, what
modifications to the plan and what conditions on approval could further
'~W~ minimize the adverse effects of the proposed use. The .following
~ development standards shall be considered general requirements for all
conditional use permits except as hereinafter provided.
(1) The land area and setback requirements of the property
containing such a use or activity meet the minimums established for
the district.
(2) When abutting a residential use, the property shall be screened
and landscaped .
~) Where applicable, all City, county, state and federal laws,
• regulations and ordinances shall be complied with and all necessary
permits secured.
(~) Signs shall not adversely impact adjoining or surrounding
residential uses.
(5) Adequate off-road parking and loading shall be provided. Such
parking and loading shall be screened and landscaped from abutting
residential uses.
/(6) The road serving the use or activity must be ofansafsucheuse or
design to accommodate the proposed use or activity,
activity shall not generate such additional extra traffic as to
create a nuisance or hazard to existing traffic or to surrounding
land use .
~j(7) All access roads, driveways, parking areas, and outside
storage, servioe, or sales areas shall be surfaced or grassed to
control dust and drainage.
(83 All open and outdoor storage, sales and service areas shall be
screened Prom view from public streets and from abutting residential
uses or districts.
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 9-15.0,
•
•
(g) All lighting shall be designed to prevent any direct source of
light being visible from adjacent residential areas or from the
public streets.
(10) The use or activity shall be properly drained to control
surface water runoff .
(11) The architectural appearance and functional plan of the
building and site shall not be so dissimilar to thT~e evaluesgor
buildings or area as to cause impairment in grope y
constitute a blighting influence.
(12) The proposed water, sewer and other utilities shall be capable
of accommodating the proposed use.
/(13) That the proposed use conforms to the comprehensive municipal
plan. Such a f finding shall be based upon the following
considerations:
(a) That certain uses may not be considered appropriate
within the interior of residential neighborhoods because of
noise, traffic, or other conditions that would tend to affect
adversely the residential character of the neighborhood and
possible reduce property values. These uses are considered
appropriate only on the periphery of residential
neighborhoods, or under such conditions as the Planning
Commission may deem proper. The uses may represent "buffer"
uses for those areas lying between single family dwellings and
non-residential uses.
(b) That certain uses are considered, as a rule, unsuitable
in Business Districts because of inherent bus~roximity to
characteristics (e.g. traffic, noise, glare), p
residential areas, the fact that they tend not to serve nearby
residential areas, or may adversely affect nearby permitted
business uses.
(c) That certain uses are considered generally unsuitable in
Industrial Districts, because of conditions that would tend to
discourage other industrial development in the vicinity.
These conditions include noise, vibrations, dust, glare,
unsightliness or similar nuisances. Certain other industrial
land uses are considered generally inappropriate because they
represent under-utilization of land. This, in turn, means a
low tax return Prom land that under fuller development would
be contributing needed revenue to the community's tax base.
Such uses, however, may be considered as temporary uses.
r
PLANNING AND DEIELOPMENT 9-15.0
(d) That certain temporary uses that are generally not
suitable within a particular Zoning district are potentially
orar basis. This may be due to the lack of
suitable on a t~P y ro erty, to a short-term need (such
development on existing p P roe of adverse
as highway construction), or to a limited deg
effects, upon adjacent land use.
These standards shall be strictly applied unless it is found in the
particular case that the community safety, health and welfare can as
well or better be served by modifying them. Any special requirements
articular case which are imposed elsewhere in this
applicable to the p
chapter shall be met in each case.
lications are reviewed by the Planning Commission but acted upon
~ihen aPP
the City Council, tre Planning Commission shincluding all recommended
Council whatever action it deems advisable, ermit.
conditions on the granting of the conditional use p
Subdivision ~4. Action: In acting upon applications for conditional
use permits, the Planning Commission or City Council shall consider the
effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals, comfort,
convenience and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands,
existing and anticipated traffic conditions, including parking
facilities on adjacent sites. When applications are reviewed byCouncil
Planning Commission but acted upon by the City Council the Creturn the
may hold whatever public hearings it deems advisable or may
application to the Planning Commission for further consideration.
(a} Approval: If it is determined that the general. and special
requirements of this chapter will be satisfied by applicant's plan,
uch ermit and may impose conditions relating to
the City may grant s p
the general and special requirements in each case, including
durational conditions.
(b) Denial: Conditional use permits may be denied by resolution.
Such resolution shall state the reasons for denial, but may
incorporate by reference the mortseshan~~r8ct~ti~nyoando~Yhother
planning Commission, staff rep ~
material relevant to the decision.
Subdivision 5. Termination: If compliance with all of the
conditions of the conditionalthe ermittisadeemed terminatede unless the
time prescribed by the City, P liance for an
Council, in its sole discretion, extends the timeolationmof a continuing
additional permit not to exceed one year. Any ermit,
condition shall violationsservedeupontthe permit holderlinathesmanner of
after notice of and upon the Council
a civil summons at least 10 days prior to hearing,
finding at the revocation hearing that the condition violated remaermit
necessary to carry out the purposes of this section and that the p
holder is unable or unwilling to satisfy the condition. Such finding
shall be made by mjority vote, upon the preponderance of the evidence
•
113
•
c
1992
DATE: March 24-
~~ TO: Planning Commissioners
Tanner
FROM• Susan Hoyt, Administrator acting as p
• for a conditional use permit for a veterinary ofithe
RE: Request enteur Avenue under §9-10.01[2](n)
at 1553 West Larp
zoning code
ro osed veterinary clinic for
tion of the p P ro osed use, its
The applicant s descrip describes the p P
enteur Avenue clearlarking and health & sanitation
1553 West Dare ation, staffing, P
hours of p
issues. center and it
rho ing
ro osed use is within an existing P
Since the p P the site conditions
enerate excessive noise or traffic, three
will not g ermit are met if there
a request for a conditional us o P the city code,
governing Under §15.04[6](26) 200 square
is enough parking. lus one space for every As
s aces are required p bud et of 15 spaces.
parking P for a total parking g le arking
feet (11.5 spaces), demonstrates, there is amp P
the diagram in Attachment A
for this activity. ro erty owners
ermit procedure all p P mail of
As part of the conditional use P ublished in the local
within 350 feet of the proposed business were ntofied y
earing and a legal notice was p
the public h no calls or letters of complaint have
paper, As of this writing ro oral.
arding this p P
been received reg
osed business meets the requirements for being
hment B), staff recommends
Since the prop ermit (Attar conditions that
granted a conditional u ra n ed with the followin sanitation, noise
that such a permit be g the health,
eration, rooming
control the--size of the op
and odor associated with a veterinary clinic with a smal g
business. These are:
clinic with grooming as a secondary use
1, Operate a veterinary to ees.
with a maximum of six emP y Cha ter 343 of the
to all Animal Welfare Laws in P
2. Adhere
Minnesota State Statutes.
intain a clean environment insiwastes,oucleaninge P rafter
3, Ma dis osal of all
with sanitary P arking lot as necessary.
clients on the walk and in the P t for the coming
the business within the builidng excep or
4, Keep No outside cages, kennels,
and going of clientele.
exercising of animals.
ound roof the common walls to adjacent businesses and the
5. S P
kennel area and exam rooms.
6. Control odors in the kennel and dark room with separate
exhaust fans.
7. Limit hospital stays to recovering animals with a maximum of
14 pets to stay.
8. Dispose of hazardous waste as regulated by the county and
state.
9. Set up and maintain the x-ray room as required by state
statute.
•
Meeting Date: 3/30/92
Agenda Item F-1
r
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Update on Comprehensive Plan
SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Administrator
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
• City's 1991 comprehensive plan was approved by Metro Council
and Community Development Committee on March 23, 1992
• Full Metro Council act on plan on April 9, 1992
• Metro Council acts on plan April 9, 1992
• Metro Council staff report is attached. Key points:
/ Waste water treatment flows from U of M and State Fair
should be documented through a Tier One study
/ The council would like the city to work with the State
Fair to encourage separation of sanitary/storm sewers.
The council realizes the city has no authority to require
it to do so
ATTACHMENT:
A. Metropolitan Council Staff Report
L~