Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPCAgenda_90Dec17• PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA DECEMBER 17, 1990 7:30 p.m. A. CALL TO ORDER: B. ROLL CALL: Barry Finnegan C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: D. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: E. REPORTS, REQUESTS, RED 1. Proposed schedule for _ Boche Daykin Duncan Nes ingen Gilson Talbo~- November 26, 1990 November 28, 1990 COMMENDATIONS: the comprehensive plan 2. Discussion of the proposed concept plan and draft policies to get direction on specific flan/policy directions where the Commission expressed questions 3. Reviews: a) Conditional use permit for J.J.'s Pool and Game Arcade b) Conditional use permit for Coiffure de Chien c) Review of "no parking between signs" on Arona between California and Larpenteur 4. Report on the term of conditional use permits. 5. Planning Commission meeting schedule and re-appointments 6. Planning request timetable for 1991 F. ADJOURN • MINUTES REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 26, 1990 7:30 p.m. Meeting was called to order at 7:35 by Chairperson Boche. PRESENT: Barry, Boche, Daykin, Duncan, Finegan, Nestingen, Gibson Talbot APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of the October 22 regular meeting and November 13 special meeting were unanimously approved as written. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ZONING CODE SECTIONS 9- Chairman Boche opened the public meeting at 7:40 p.m. He explained that the Planning Commission proposes to amend zoning code sections 9-4.01 Subdivision 3 Permitted Accessory Uses to read: (1) Garage and residential boutique sales limited to two sales each calendar year per residential unit, not to exceed ten consecutive days or two consecutive weekends. Planner Hoyt explained that garage and boutique sales are not included as a permitted accessory use in residential zones. Nevertheless, the occasional single family or neighborhood garage sale/boutique sale occurs without complications and complaints. However, a number of complaints from residents adjacent to dwellings where these sales frequently occur suggests that some regulation of these sales may be in order. Garage and boutique sales generate more traffic, parking demands and goods in a driveway and yard than are consistently desirable in a residential zone. Mr. Warren Peterson, 1373 Hoyt, attendee at the public hearing, asked who initiated the proposed amendment. Planner Hoyt explained that the staff did, based upon complaints received from residents adjacent to neighbors having unlimited garage sales. A commissioner asked if anything can be done if a resident violates this ordinance. Planner Hoyt explained that a warning of the code violation would be given first. If this warning was ignored, a citation could be issued which could result in a fine. As a final step, the resident could be taken to court for 1 • repeatedly violating a zoning code. Chairman Boche moved to close the public hearing at 8 p.m. After a brief discussion, the commission unanimously moved to place this amendment on the agenda of the City Council to be reviewed and approve/disapprove at its December or January meeting. REPORT ON THE THIRD COMMUNITY LAND USE PLANNING FORUM AND THE S P OC SS STAF Chairperson Boche thanked Commissioner Finegan for chairing the special planning commission meeting and the Third Community Land Use Planning Forum in his absence which was held November 13, and asked him for a brief summary of the forum. Commissioner Finegan stated there were approximately 60 people in attendance. The public response has been very strong at these forums and had clearly shown the public wants to be involved in the planning process. The key point for the forum was that residents are opposed to strip development along Larpenteur. Avery general discussion of the concept plan followed. Chairperson Boche asked if there was a timeline set for the rest of the schedule. Planner Hoyt stated at this point there is not a specific date set but hoped to be finished by June, 1991. Planner Hoyt was asked to talk to Fred Hoisington about a timeline and report back at the December, 1990 commission meeting. Commissioners asked if those attending the last forum will receive drafts of the policies. Planner Hoyt stated that all participants in the forums will be invited to a meeting discussing these policies after city commissioners, staff, and the consultant prepare the next draft. Copies will be made available to anyone who requests one and to those attending the public meetings. A public hearing will be held on the final draft plan. The city council will review the draft parking policy at its January, 1991 meeting. REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND OTHER ITEMS DESIGNATED FOR Planner Hoyt asked how the planning commission would like staff to carry out reviews of conditional use hermits and parking designations that the commission identified for review. It was decided that staff will provide a report on the two • ~1 conditional use hermits and the Arona 'no harking' designation at the next meeting. She will also determine whether or not a conditional use permit expires when the business use closes at the location. Meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Dee Swenson, Recor ing Secre ary Susan Hoy Ci y P anner • • i• MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 1990 Baldwin convened the meeting at 7:00 P.M. ALL MEMBERS PRESENT (~= -a ~, Baldwin, Ciernia, Gehrz, Jacobs and Wallin. Also present were Wiessner and Chenoweth. ADDENDUM TO AGENDA Council added the following item to the policy agenda: F(7), Consider Issuing a Special Temporary Permit to Allow a Rooftop Display on the Bullseye Building. MINUTES OF 11/14/90 APPROVED The Minutes of November 14, 1990 were approved by unanimous consent. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED The following Consent Agenda items were approved by unanimous consent: 1. Disbursements: a. General Disbursements through 11/28/90, $83,765.57 b. Payroll, 11/1/90 - 11/15/90, $8,611.29 2. Commission Minutes: a. Solid Waste Commission Minutes of 11/1/90 b. Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes of 11/15/90 3. Check Cancellations: a. No. 24606, 11/6/90, issued to Road Rescue in Amount of $105.61, Duplicate Payment b. No. 24618, 11/7/90, issued to Suburban Chamber of Commerce in Amount of $8.00, Participant Could not Attend Meeting 4. Northwest Youth & Family Services Amendment to Joint Agreement 5. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Air Monitoring Site Lease Extension 6. Cancellation of 12/26/90 Council Meeting PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED 1991 BUDGET Baldwin opened the hearing and explained to the public the procedures to be followed during such hearing. Wiessner reveiwed the budget process, all major changes, and then presented graphs showing sources of revenue, expenditures, and other items of interest. Baldwin noted a written comment from Hafsa Meah, 1597 Hollywood Court, indicating they feel the taxes are too high in all three taxing districts, City, School and County. He then asked for comments from the public. MRS. MELVIN WIGDAHL, 1445 W. LARPENTEUR, stated she was concerned about increased fees for sewer and recyling as she MINUTES NOVEMBER 28, 1990 PAGE 2 does not recycle and being on a fixed income the higher sewer • fees make it difficult to remain in her home. She also felt the whole County is suffering from inflation and that ,people should make themselves heard on the local and state levels. Baldwin assured Mrs. Wigdahl that her concern regarding sewer rates would be passed on to the Metro Waste Control Commission as their rate increase to the City has made the City increase necessary. KEN LANCASTER, 1905 N. SNELLING, commented oh the proposed increase in employee compensation and felt that $330 per employee was an exorbitant price for insurance. He felt employees are overcompensated and that those funds should be used to assist residents who are disabled or on a fixed income. BOB BROWN, 1592 MAPLE KNOLL, questioned whether or not information on one of the handouts regarding the tax rate would be correct if the University population was deducted. Wiessner explained that the tax__rate is based. on property value, not on population. CARL JESSEN, 2161 FOLWELL, expressed his thanks for the informative presentation and for a job well done. DAVID BELL, 1834 ASBURY, commented on the fact that major businesses are trying layoffs to be competitive and reduce . costs, and questioned why everything here keeps going up. Baldwin replied that the City has made changes reducing costs, i.e., changing the policing contract from Ramsey County to Roseville. He also explained that the City's work load has increased, and that there is a difference between businesses and government in that businesses can choose to make reductions, whereas a municipality must meet the needs of the residents regardless of the economy. Mr. Bell felt that police and fire protection are a necessity, but why not reduce costs in other areas. Baldwin replied that the City has looked at other areas and have decreased some costs. Wiessner added that the City makes use of two senior volunteers rather than hiring part time help as a means of keeping costs down. MRS. WIGDAHL commented on the City's organizational chart and asked about the employment of the attorney, engineer and fiscal consultant. Baldwin explained that these people work on a consulting basis, and are not full time employees. Jacobs explained that the City is pursuing grants on a federal and state level in an attempt to reduce costs, and that the City has received a $69,000 grant for park use which will save a significant amount. Wiessner commented on the fact that the City's cost per capita is much lower than others, but that most of the costs fall on the residential property because there is so little commercial property in the City. There being no others wishing to be heard Baldwin closed the hearing at 8:15 P.M. MINUTES NOVEMBER 28, 1990 PAGE 3 • ADOPTION OF THE 1991 BUDGET - RESOLUTION R-90-44 Ciernia moved adoption of Resolution R-90-44 adopting the 1991 Budget as presented. Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION R-90-44 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1991 BUDGET AND CERTIFYING THE 1991 TAX LEVY - - ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 0-90-9 AUTHORIZING COLLECTION OF A FEE FOR COLLECTION OF SOLID WASTE Baldwin explained that Council had previously decided to bill residents directly on the utility bills for recycling services rather than going through Ramsey County, and must now adopt an Ordinance to implement the process. The recycling portion of the solid waste fee presently being charged on the tax statement will be removed as of January 1, 1990 Jacobs then moved adoption of Ordinance 0-90-9 which carried unanimously. ORDINANCE 0-90-9 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5, PART 14 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS AND AUTHORIZING THE COLLECTION OF A FEE FOR SOLID WASTE • ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION R-90-45 ESTABLISHING FEES FOR COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLES Council briefly discussed the proposed resolution which will provide for a fee to cover the cost of collection of recyclables from all households within the City. Gehrz moved adoption of Resolution R-90-45 which carried unanimously. RESOLUTION R-90-45 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES FOR COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLE SOLID WASTE AND INCORPORATING SUCH FEES INTO SECTION 5-14.07 (UTILITY FEES) OF THE CITY CODE • Council disccused the possibility of adding commercial businesses to the recycling program and made some suggestions for items to be included in the Request for Proposals for recycling services. SEWER TELEVISING/CLEANING TO BE INCLUDED IN 1991 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Baldwin presented quotes for televising and televising/cleaning of the sanitary sewers in the street construction areas. Jacobs moved that the contract be awarded to VISU-CLEAN for televising and cleaning the sewers at a cost of $3,225.00. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTES NOVEMBER 28, 1990 PAGE 4 DISCUSSION OF CITY SHARING IN COST OF SEWER REPAIRS - CONTINUED . FROM LAST MEETING Baldwin commented on Gedde's letter of November 16; 1990 (a copy of which is on file in the City office) regarding any further liability on the part of the City sharing in the cost of repair of private sewer line repairs. He explained that other Cities maintain the main only, however Council concurred they were inclined to share in this cost up to a limited amount, such amount yet to be determined. The City Attorney was directed to draft an ordinance which would allow the City to participate in a portion of the cost without incurring any further liability. NO ACTION TAKEN ON PROPOSAL FROM METRO RELATIONS, INC. Wiessner explained that Metro Relations, Inc, is proposing to monitor the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and is asking that Falcon Heights consider participation. Wiessner recommended not taking action at this time, but that Council consider looking into Suburban Rate Association. Council agreed and will be presented further information regarding the Association at a future meeting. UPDATE ON FALCON HEIGHTS-ROSEVILLE COOPERATION STUDY Wiessner explained that the City has been notified that the grant application for funds for the joint study has been denied which will require a change in plans if the Cities wish to continue. Some possible options given were were to look for other funding, use of City reserve funds, or downsizing the project. A joint workshop will be held at Roseville City Hall on January 7, 199 to discuss the matter. Wiessner suggested the Falcon Heights City Council hold,a workshop prior to the joint meeting to discuss options. SPECIAL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVED FOR J'S LIQUORS, 1557 W. ~ LARPENTEUR, TO ALLOW A ROOFTOP DISPLAY ON BULLSEYE BUILDING Ciernia moved that a request from J's Liquors to allow a rooftop display during the store grand opening on December 6th through 8th be approved. Motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:14 P.M. Tom Baldwin, riayor ATTEST • Shirley Chenoweth, City Clerk Meeting Date 12/17/90 Agenda Item E-1 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM DESCRIPTION: Proposed schedule for the comprehensive plan SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Planner (in consultation with Fred Hoisington, Planning Consultant) REVIEWED BY: Jan Wiessner, City Administrator EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION: The Commission requested an updated schedule for the comprehensive planning process. This schedule is attached for your information. The attached schedule includes a review of the draft policies by the Park, Solid Waste and Human Rights Commissions and City staff. If their comments are substantially different from the proposed policies, I am recommending a special January Planning Commission workshop to discuss how to incorporate and consolidate these comments into the policies prior to the regularly scheduled January Planning Commission meeting. Since the concept plan and the policies are the crux of the comprehensive plan once they are completed, the remaining time will be spent writing it, reviewing it and approving it. ATTACHMENT 1 - PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SCHEDULE ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Review, discuss and change as necessary. • • Meeting Date 12/17/90 Agenda Item E-1 Attachment 1 December 5, 1990 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SCHEDULE 1. City Council resolution requesting a second Dec. 12 extension from the Metropolitan Council until December 31, 1991 2. Revise draft policies with consulting Dec. 17 planner and staff 3. Policy revision to Planning Commission Dec. 17 (for discussion and change in key items) 4. Policies distributed to staff Jan. 3 5. Policies distributed to commissions a) Human Rights ~ b) Solid Waste Jan. 3 c) Park Jan. 14 6. Planning Commission policy workshop (Saturday,) Jan. 19 (if needed) 7. Planning Commission public meeting Jan. 28 (send invitations to past participants) 8. Staff/consultant write draft comprehensive Feb./ Mar.* plan 9. Planning Commission review of draft March 25* comprehensive plan 10. Planning Commission public hearing on draft April 22* comprehensive plan il. City Council action on comprehensive plan April 24 or May 22* * Flexible, if writing goes smoothly we may move date up or move it back if it goes more slowly Meeting Date 12 17 90 Agenda Item 2 C7 CITY. OF FALCON HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM DESCRIPTION: Discussion of the proposed concept plan and ra ~o ides o get direction on specific plan/policy directions where the Commission expressed questions. SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Planner Susan Hoyt, City Planner EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION: Due to time constraints, a second revision of the policies is not attached to this agenda item, but will be distributed at the meeting. However, there are some key points in the concept plan and draft policies that Commissioners questioned or expressed reservations about at the special Planning Commission meeting on November 13, 1990. Therefore, before proceeding further with the policies, some clarification is necessary. Of course, any other plan elements or policies are open for discussion too. A. CONCEPT PLAN: 1. The proposed location of a neighborhood retail center in the vicinity of Lindig and Larpenteur 2. The identification of Gibbs Schoolhouse as an historic site B. POLICIES: 1. (TRANSPORTATION) To cooperate with the University of Minnesota in reducing their dependence on Cleveland Avenue as a main entrance to the campus. 2. (GENERAL DEVELOPMENT) To restrict developments throughout the City to three stories or 35 feet in height. ATTACHMENT 1 Memo discussing these plan elements/policy issues ATTACHMENT 2 Bugle article on Gibbs Schoolhouse ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Discuss and clarify Commission position on the plan elements and policies. Meeting Date 12/17/90 Item E-2 Attachment 1 MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Susan Hoyt, City Planner RE: Discussion and clarification of key concept plan elements and policies The following questions and information may be useful as you review the concept plan elements and draft policies highlighted on the agenda cover sheet. A. CONCEPT PLAN 1. The location of a possible neighborhood retail center in the vicinity of Lindig and Larpenteur (roughly in area of B & J Florist). a. Relationship to oal #10 - "improved but concen ra ed neig or ood retail centers" 28 agree/10 disagree/4 no opinion, several comments to retain only the existing commercial centers (Commissioners raised this question.) • b. Service area - To the North - Falcon Woods and some Roseville homes To the West - University Grove neighborhood (also has Speedy Market in SAP and Super America at Eustis and Larpenteur. The Lindig location may be quicker for the east end of the Grove). To the East - Garden Avenue, St. Mary, Fry neighborhood (also has Tom Thumb) To the South - U of M people as they enter and exit at Gortner c. Traffic Flow - From the North - From Fairview or Tatum onto Larpenteur. A stoplight is proposed for Fairview and Larpenteur. From West - From Larpenteur From East - From Larpenteur From South - From Gortner d. Commercial adjacent to residential use - Existing Conditions - already a commercial use exists in this vicinity, B & J Florist 1 • Shifting Conditions - Traffic levels, lights, loading, noise, hours of operation mad increase with change to neighborhood retail Controls - May control for the impact of some new conditions through zoning by requiring a conditional use 2. Designation of the Gibbs Schoolhouse on the southwest corner of Cleveland and Larpenteur across from Gibbs Farm as an historic site. Built in 1873, it remained open until the early 1960's. a. Designation of site - Not formally designated as significant by the county, state or nation. However, identified on state historical society survey as possibly worth investigating b. Current status - County Historical Society is ronting an effort to raise funds to save the structure after the recent fire. The University may not be interested in retaining the building on site. However, it is considered more significant on its site. B. POLICIES 1. (TRANSPORTATION) To cooperate with the University of Minnesota in reducing its dependence on Cleveland Avenue as a main entrance to campus. Mr. Hoisington described this change in entrance to the University as hutting more traffic onto Hoyt from Snelling entering the State Fair Grounds parking lot. Commissioners familiar with campus traffic patterns asked if Commonweath, not Hoyt, was the route most heavily used from Snelling. Due to the confusion over this policy, I spoke with the University Planner, Harvey Turner, about the University's plans regarding entrances to campus. He said that the University has no major plans to change access. The University will always look to the west. The symbolic and visitor entrance will remain Cleveland. However, he said that Folwell, Commonwealth at Snelling and Gortner act as functional entrances for persons going to parking areas including the State Fair grounds. The development of the University transitway between campuses may increase State Fair parking use, but not • involve major shifts in entrances. Therefore, I recommend dropping this policy. 2 2. (GENERAL DEVELOPMENT) To restrict developments throughout the City to three stories or 35 feet in height. Commissioners inquired about the value of this policy given some of the proposals for developments on the southeast corner which included five stories. Mr. Hoisinc~ton responded that the only section in the City that might accommodate a taller than three story building is the southeast corner of Larpenteur and Snelling since retaining the small town, low density appearance of the community is desirable. He explained that if a proposal came forward, the height limit would provide negotiating leverage with developers and, if desirable, the policy could be amended for this specific site. However, the specific policy could also be excluded, if Commissioners felt it would be too restrictive and phrased less specifically. Please raise other plan elements and policies that need clarification and direction from the Commission. • 3 .._.~ O w o w -~ ~ °' ova ~ '; ~ aiu ?"~ co n ~ O•' ~' N y ~ ~ (D D ' :T• G: :-c ~ to ( .. ~ ~ ~ 0. n.'O O A ~ ~ < A C ~~`< ~ ~"` ' ,~ ~ ~ ~ ,may ~ ~ fD ~ NAc a o a,o rn ar. < ° < ° ~ ^ ~ ~` ] ~ fD y BCD ~ ~ - o c n ~ C aG ~ a o '" ~ ~ :y ~ • w ~ ~ ~ O lD ~. G ~• O i1. ~ to ~e .t to (D 'z• p G p O p4 ~ O N ~ ~ ry K ~ O_ ~ ~ rr "" 3 c O w ~ ~ G D- .« ~ Cl. ~ to O ; ~ O N A G (9 :Z Etr .Y ~ rD c O. ,..' w A O A~ y n• O~ 0 O N 0. G A 0 a ~' K p A ~ W ~ o _: ~ o ~ x o ~.~ p; -•~ O o• cn C• ^-3 w co n ~ .~ ce ~ ~ ;~ ~ T ~ C. ti <• p, C n to ~ y O ~ [~D ~ o fl.. ~ ?. ~ O ~ N v' C [~ p~ ~ =- r•. - w ~ a O~~~ ~ ry. ~ Q4 ,..~ y ~ O A~ ~ O y O C• ~. ~ C y ~ ~ p n• ~'. - < 0.O 7 ~ A << O w ~. ~ !D -~ Z A r: 0. ~ << N w 0 ~ _"'~ G O -" fD O~ 0.y h lD ~ ~_• O rt~ A S S y G w `G O b G ~ C• p rn~ y- G y C ~' 4. n G CD v, N y~~ G f) G y n• ~ 0.O ~ .: .C ~ N H (D H O ~ S-. ~ y y ~ ~ ,-~~• ~ - ~ ~ ~ •~. O ~ ~ ~. ~ fD ,., j ~ `•G Q. p C <n tt4 ~ ~•c C A 0. C w O.. ~ C., w C va ~ S -• .~ w m w ~ n... n o cn ~ .* ~* ~ pp p: A cn fD ~ cC cn fD C, y ~ O. ~ ~' C ~ ~ C 'U ~ 'A"~s d ~ ~ .~ d ~ f~D y C' ~ .w+ .,,,i G t~i~ j A A ~ ~ O 0. dCi ~p pQ v+ a i l7~~ i !D ... O ~ ~ O Q ~ ~Oeic d ~} 7 F~ f) Q p o _~ ~ ~ O ~ .. A ~ ... _ ~ ~ j C "" ~~ as ~ w A O nw ~J' A CT C r ~. f~ A O .~ . n e~ ; ~e o. .,, • p . .. . fD ~ ..' .. R. ~''y e~' ~--- 1 ~~ • • • Schoolhouse-from 1 land donated by Heman Gibbs. In the mid-1800s, Gibbs farm- steaded 160 acres straddling • Larpenteur Avenue. A wooden stove heated the classroom as children from the surrounding farms of Rose township came for their lessons. By the mid-1930s, other larger schools were being built in the area; yet the Gibbs school continued to serve as a kindergarten up until the early 1960s. "The schoolhouse today is located in one of the most urban counties in Minnesota and is a reminder to the area that it actually had a very rural past," . said Truer. "The schoolhouse also represents the transition in education, too." While the Ramsey County Historical Society has not yet taken any official position on the fate of the building, Hoisington said he wants to see the building saved. "There are so few buildings from the 19th century up there that it would' be a shame to see anything torn down or destroyed," he said. The University is currently reviewing its preliminary decision to take down the old schoolhouse and turn the corner into a gateway to the St. Paul campus, according to Clinton Hewitt, Assistant Vice President for Physical Planning at the University. ,. "I've received calls, I've had - conversations with the city of Falcon Heights, and I've talked with the Ramsey County Historical Society staff about the the historical importance of the site and facility," said Hewitt. "We certainly will weigh carefully any suggestions." . Citing cost and the building's ,,unsuitability, city administrator _ ~~° Janet Weissner said Falcon - _ Heights is no longer considering - - - moving the building to a local parlLand using it as a shelter. But.~Veissner said the city is in _ support of the Historical Society's efforts to save the structure. The Historical Society has organized an open meeting at Falcon Heights City Hall, 2077 Larpenteur Ave., on Wed Dec 5 at T~~to measure local community- support toward saving the schoolhouse. Representatives from the -University will participate in the meeting and will report any proposals to the adminis- tration and Boazd of Regents. °In the final analysis, we would have a concern that a building on the campus is being used for a campus . purpose and that there are funds to adequately maintain it," said Hewitt. Hoisington believes the open meeting will be a good way to get everyone in the . community involved. "We don't want to see the building torn down and then have a discussion-about it after-~~ ~i°: wards," said yoisington. • Truer sees a lot.of potential for the building. "I think it would be a wonderful - ` research facility for the - community and several different historical societies," she said. "There's plenty of room, so it could also bean excellent exhibit space." -_ =-_ _~ - ~:. Photo by Truman Olson Tamara Truer, manager of Gibbs Farm, stands inside the schoolhouse that the Gibbs children attended a century ago and ponders what Its fate will be. Meeting Date 12 17 90 Agenda Item - • CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM DESCRIPTION: Reviews of two businesses with conditional use perms s a 1 4 W. Larpenteur and 1660 North Snelling and a "no parking between signs" designation on either side of the alley along Arona between California and Larpenteur. SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Planner REVIEWED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Planner EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION: The review process for the two conditional use permits and "no parking between signs" designation involves checking for complaints and requesting police data on the properties or place in question. Please find the attached memo from Tom Alleva of the Roseville Police Department regarding these reviews. ATTACHMENT 1 - Memo dated 12/10/90 from City Planner ATTACHMENT 2 - Police Report dated 11/14/90 ATTACHMENT 3 - Conditional Use Permit, 1544 W. Larpenteur • ATTACHMENT 4 - Conditional Use Permit, 1660 Snelling Ave. N. ATTACHMENT 5 - Planner's Memo dated 5/14/90 on McAllister "No Parking" request ATTACHMENT 6 - Letter dated 3/16/90. from Ms. McAllister ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Review and discuss 2. Recommend that staff meet with Mr. Joe Sacco and Mr. Jim Sacco of J.J.'s about meeting the conditions by increasing control over the rear exit and the interior security of the business. i• Meeting Date 12 17 9 Agenda Item E- Attachment 1 • MEMO DATE: 12/10/90 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Susan Hoyt, City Planner RE: Review of two businesses with conditional use permits and one "no parking between signs" designation 1. J.J.'s POOL AND GAME ARCADE - Northome Center, 1544 W. Larpenteur a. Com laints. This summer, one complaint from an adjacent proffer y owner was received regarding the driving of vehicles around the back parking lot between 11 p.m. and midnight. I spoke with the business owner and he met with the resident to discuss the problem. She indicated that the owner was courteous and the situation improved after their conversation. b. Police Re ort. (Attachment 2) Fifteen police calls re a e o is property. Nine of the fifteen were related to assaults or fights. This is atypical for other businesses in the City. Deputy Chief Alleva said • that increasing the interior security and the parking lot security with possible increased staffing might help. c. Conditions. (Attachment 3) From conversations with the i y orney, it appears the City cannot change the conditions of the conditional use permit once it is approved or businesses would be constantly required to meet new conditions after they opened. However, the City can enforce the conditions. The following conditions require attention: (1) Condition #2 regarding use of the back parking lot (2) Condition #3 regarding the back door exit An automatic lock for emergency exit only might be required to enforce this condition. (3) Condition #6 posting of "no loitering" signs on exterior of property (4) Condition #8 interior security might be improved with recommendations from police. (5) Condition #9 regarding expulsion of persons and controlling disorderly conduct in the parking lot 1 • • d. Recommendation. The police report identifies a security pro em a 's. The lack of residents complaints suggests that the security problem is confined to the parking lot and premises rather than affecting the surrounding residential neighborhoods. The conditional use permit provides the City leverage for enforcing security measures. The most effective way to carry out the enforcement of these conditions is for the City staff, including police personnel, to meet with the business owners to discuss ways to increase security. This will require touring the premises with police personnel and the fire marshal. To date, the owners have demonstrated a willingness to work with the City. By beginning in a cooperative rather than heavy-handed spirit, the business and City may achieve the best results. 2. COIFFURE DU CHIEN PET GROOMING AND LIMITED BOARDING - 1660 Snelling Avenue, North a. Com laints. One complaint was received prior to the opening o this establishment. The complaint came from another dog groomer outside the City. She stated her concern over the owner's "professionalism". She was told that the City cannot control for good business • practices, but did put conditions regarding the size of the operation on the property and conformance to state statutes. The caller was relieved to hear this. (Attachment 4) b. Police reports. None c. Recommendation. None 3. "NO PARKING BETWEEN SIGNS" DESIGNATION ON EITHER SIDE OF THE ALLEY ON ARONA BETWEEN CALIFORNIA AND LARPENTEUR a. Back round. (See attachment 5) The Planning ommission recommended, and the City Council approved, the placement of "no harking between signs" on either side of the alley to increase safety for alley use and for the residents of 1513 California as they exit their driveway. The resident of 1513 California originally requested a "No Parking" designation for the entire half block alongside her house because residents of the apartment building to the north park there. Commissioners recommended the alley posting rather than the half-block posting because there was a concern that residents would park in the Northome lot, and possibly add to the problems there. (Coincidentally, it is the resident of 1513 California who complained about the parking lot activity from J.J.'s.) • • b. Police report: The police report indicated that there were ive accidents at the intersection of Arona and Larpenteur, and one accident in the alley behind 1504 Larpenteur. However, none of these were related to the "no parking between signs" posting. c. Field r~e o~rt. Several drive-bys indicate that people are o~ ng~~ie no parking signs. Cars continue to park along Arona to the north and south of these signs adjacent to 1513 California. d. Resident _r~eport. As of this writing, the resident of 'i~i~Z~ali o~ rnia has not been reached about her driveway exit. 3. Recommendation. No action if safety issue is solved. • 3 ` 11/15/1'9© 20 35 FROM CITY OF ROSEUILLE TO FALCON HEIGHTS P.©2 AGENDA ITEM E-3 ATTACHMENT 2 • November 14, 1990 TO; Susan Hoyt, City Planner FROM: Tom Alleva, Roseville PolXCe Department ,, SIIBJECTt REVIEW OF TWO CONDITIONAL IISE FE~tMITB AND ONE ~'NO PARKING" DESIGNATION I have reviewed the activity at each location from January 1994 through October 1990. I have also checked with the various shift sergeants and their officers persona]. views on activity at the three locations. I, JJ'S POOL AND GAME ARCADE - 544 W. LAI~PENTEUR officer JJ's has generated 15 police calls plus numerous drive-throughs. DATF CN TIME TXPE OF CALL • 2-23-90 11:26 J?M Fight - Verbal arguments inside, kicked outside CN 90007630 Combatants were where a fight ensued. Alcohol involved. 2_24_90 1.:00 PM Possess].on/Consumption of A1COho1- CN 90007759 Undex'age drinking in rear Iot. 3-31-90 12:37 AM Motor Vehicle Accident CN 90012931 4_8_90 14;11 PM Weapons ComplaXnt - A group of of white CN 90014360 Hmongs harassed a group kids, shooting out a car window with a pellet gun. 8-2-90 10:26 PM Assault CN 90034818 $_2_94 10;28 PM Assault - Same suspect as in CN 90034820 previous Assault. g_Z..gO 11:45 PM Runaway/Warxant Arrest - Father inside a ON 94038130 y son pointed out ~tunaw • JJ's. 8-17-90 8:46 PM Assault - 1~Iutual co~a-batants CN 50037558 outside JJ's. • • 11i15i194~1 2G:37 FF,'OM CITY C1F P,USEVILLE .r2_ 8--20-90 CN 90038135 8-~24-90 CN 90038852 9-Z9-90 CN 90045045 1a-10-90 CN 90046782 10-13--90 CN 90047343 10-I5-90 CN 90047585 i0~18-90 CN 90047994 TO FALCGh! HEIGHTS P.03 11:59 PM Recovered Bicycle - in rear Iot. 4:43 PM Warrant Arrest - assisted Ramsey County Sheriff's in a Warrant Arrest. 9:53 PM Assault/Damage to Property - Oriental males were suspected of assaulting the JJ's manager. 3:10 PM Assault - in rear lat. 12:30 AM Assault -Same suspect as ~.n above Assault. 4:30 PM Threat Complaint - Related to Assault of 10-x0-90. 10:45 AM Burglary Nine of the fifteen calls related to assaults or fights. It is an unfortunate sign of the times that violence is on the increase throughout the 'U.S. These types of Calls involve multi--Car response and involve many more police personnel hours than non' violent calls. They, of course, reflect society, but not in a good light. JJ's should work on interior and rear parking lot security, .even if they have to hire additional help. Locking the rear exit or prohxbitir~g any entry via the rear door may help, but Would increase pedestrian traffic walking easterly around to the front entrance. Restricting hours may also help, as six of the incidents happened 2tt 11 PM or later. 2. COIFFURE DU CHIEN PET GROOMING - 1660 N. SHELLING We have had no contact with or complaints relating to this establishment. 3. "NO PARKING BETWEEN SIGNS" ON EITHER SIDE OF Tf~E ALLEY ON HE EAST SIDE OF ARONA BETWEEN TAF2PEN~UR AND CALIFORNIA We have had five accidents on Larpenteur at Arona, and one accident in the alley behind 1504 Larpenteur. None of these related to the "No Parking" signs. We have had no other calls or complaints regarding traffic and the parking signs. -3- • One comment from the officers would be to try to eliminate some of the signs along Axona, between California and Larpenteur. There are numerous parking regulation signs and they could be confusing. Please call me if you have any other questions or concerns about these three situations. TJA/ a • • TOTAL P.~74 R-89-18 ' ~~ Nc= ~~ • CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS C C O U N C I L R E S O L U T I O R Date August 9, 1989 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION R-89-5 GRANTING A USE PERMIT FOR OPERATION OF A GAME ARCADE AT 1544 WEST LARPENTEUR (NORTHOME SHOPPING CENTER) WHEREAS, the City of Falcon Heights received an application dated December 21, 1988 for the issuance of a conditional use permit to establish a game arcade in Northome Shopping Center, 1544 West Larpenteur; and WHEREAS, the City Council did carefully consider the. request as well as the recommendations made by the City's Planning Commission after holding the required Public Hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights that a conditional use permit for the establishment of a game arcade at 1544 West Larpenteur Avenue be granted subject to the following conditions: (1) Maximum hours of operation will be 10:00 A.M. to 12:00 Midnight Sunday through Thursday and 10:00 A.M. to 1:00 A.K. Friday and Saturday. All existing applicable curfews will be enforced on the premises. (2) Restriction on use of back parking Iot after 9:00 F.M. will be adequately posted by property owner: (a) Game Room parking will be restricted to front and side parking lots after 9:00 P.M. Property owner will install appropriate signage. (b) All Arona exits from parking lot shall be posted "left turn only after 9:00 P.M.". (3)" The back door will be an exit only, conforming to Fire Code. Wallin Moved by TEAS Naffs BALD~+ I N C I ERNI A CHENOk'ETH WALLIN BUSH 5 in Favor 0 Against Approved by ~~L~ Mayor August 9, 1989 D `/ -, Attested by ~/' City Cle k August 9, 1989 Date Adopted by Council August 9, 1989 ••~ • -2- (4) No less than present level of illumination in the rear parking lot will be provided. (5) No alcoholic beverages (including 3.2 beer or wine) or controlled substances without a prescription shall be sold, possessed, or consumed on the premises of the game room, the common areas within the building, or the parking areas. (6) The property owner will post on the exterior of the premises "No Loitering" and will prevent any loitering in coon areas within the building or in the parking areas and sidewalks adjacent to the building. (7) Any person who has been convicted of a feloay, controllearsuistance abuse, or gambling law violation within the past five y prohibited from working as an attendant at the game room. (8) The interior of the game room will be free of obstructions to visual supervision by attendants and will be adequately lighted. (9) Game room management will take all reasonable action to expel intoxicated persons and will allow no disorderly conduct on the premises, parking areas and adjacent sidewalks. (10) Adequate adult supervision will be provided until one-half hour after closing to ensure that the health, safety and welfare and existing community standards of peace and quiet are maintained. At Council's discretion, additional supervisory and/or security personnel may be required. (11) First review period of this conditional use will be within three months after opening with annual reviews to follow on anniversary date of opening. Review will also be required upon a change in proprietorship or focus of the business. The purpose of reviews will be foryadhet~usiness editions to address any concerns created b (12) All advertising, signage or promotion of the business will focus on attracting family oriented business. (13) At least fifty (50) percent of the interior space will be designated as a "21o Smoking" area. c; C ~~~~`. ~' ~~ ~,~rv~ E -3 No. R-90-25 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS C O U N C I L R E S O L U T I O N Date June 27, 1990 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A PET GROOMING AND PET BOARDING BUSINESS AT 1600 N. SNELLING, NORTHOME SHOPPING CENTER, IN A B-2 DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City of Falcon Heights received an application from Roberta Madison for the issuance of a conditional use permit to operate a pet grooming and pet boarding business at 1600 N. Snelling, Northome Shopping Center in a B-2 District; and WHEREAS, the City Council did carefully consider the request as well as the recommendations made by the City's Planning Commission after holding the required Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, it was determined that the conditional use permit meets all the general and specific requirements set forth in Section 9-15.04, Subdivision 3(a) of the Zoning Code; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Falcon Heights that a conditional use permit for the operation of a pet grooming and boarding business at 1600 N. Snelling be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. Maintain limited boarding as a secondary business. Board a maximum of ten animals including the business owners animals, but not including animals on the premises for grooming only with no overnight accommodation. 2. Adhere to all Animal Welfare Laws in Chapter 343 of the Minnesota State Statutes. Approved by ~~~ - /~f p Mayor ~ i• YEAS NAYS BALDWIN Absent CIERNIA GEHRZ WALLIN Absent JACOBS June 2 7 ; - -19 30 D e 3 In Favor Attested by City Clerk June- 27 , 1990 Date 0 Against Adopted by Council June 27, 1990 • ~ Council Resolution Pet Grooming & Boarding Business June 27, 1990 Page 2 3. Maintain a clean environment inside and outside the business with sanitary disposal of all wastes, cleaning up after clients on the walk and in the parking lot as necessary. 4. Keep the business within the building except for the coming and going of clientele. No outside cages, kennels, or exercising of animals. 5. Review the status of the operation within six months of ter approval . • i• ~'~- ~ ~-3 May 14, 1990 ~O: PARKING COMMITTEE FROM: SUSAN HOYT TAFF, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: MC ALLISTER "NO PARKING" REQUEST BACKGROUND On March 23, 1990, Ms. Susan McAllister, 1513 California, requested the Planning Commission to consider posting a "no parking" zone adjacent to her dwelling along the eastside of Arona Street between California and Larpenteur. The request was made because cars are parking on Arona alongside her home. Ms. McAllister reported that the parked vehicles create a safety hazard when she backs out of her driveway, and that the occupants of the vehicles leave litter and harm the landscaping in her side yard. She reported that the cars belong to the occupants of the apartment building on the corner of Arona and Larpenteur. The Planning Commission referred this item to the staff for research and the Parking Committee for its consideration. INFORMATION Existing Parking ReguJ_ations (See Figure 1) * No parking on Arona between Hoyt and California (By Council resolution in 1976 due to a state aid street.) • * No parking on the western one-half block of Larpenteur between Arona and Pascal * No parking on the west side of Arona alongside Northome Shopping Center between California and Larpenteur * No parking along the west side of Arona north of Larpenteur (due to being a state aid street) On-Site Report Several drive-bys of the site indicated that from one to four cars were parked an Arona alongside the McAllister property at various times of the day. Some of these cars infringed on the five feet of space adjacent to the driveway, which can create a visibility problem for users of the McAllister driveway. Approximately two to three cars were also parked adjacent to the apartment building on the corner of Arona and Larpenteur. There were also about four cars on the eastern side of the Northome Shopping Center lot, possibly associated with the apartment building residents. There are nine garages and no off-street, surfaced parking for the ten-unit apartment building. On drive-bys on Pascal and Arona, staff noticed that parking was allowed adjacent to the single family dwellings located near apartment buildings on Arona at the end of Crawford and at Larpenteur and Pascal. However, there were not as many cars parked at these dwellings because some paved off-street parking was available behind the units, and because parking was allowed on Larpenteur • in front of the Arona and Pascal building. -2- Police Report • The Roseville Police officers found no safety problems associated with the existing parking arrangement on this block during their drive-bys of the neighborhood. Follow-U~ Staff spoke with the owner/manager of the apartment building about tenant parking. The owner said there were currently twelve cars associated with the ten units. She also said that most tenants did not rent the garage space, but preferred on-street parking or parked in the Northome lot. She said no formal arrangements exist with the owner of the Northome Shopping Center.. .She also said that she knew of no complaints associated with residents and guests parking in this lot or on the street. As part of her request, Ms. McAllister suggested an arrangement be made with the Northome owners to accommodate the apartment parking demand. Since the apartment owners and residents are not breaking any code requirements nor requesting any action from the City, it is difficult to see on what grounds we could require the owner of the apartments to work out an agreement with the Northome owners. Such an agreement would probably lead to a charge to the apartment owners and/or the elimination of the casual parking arrangement now available to the apartment dwellers. • Furthermore, in the past loitering and occasional vandalism have Although the City encourages off-street parking with residential units, it is difficult to encourage tenants to rent and use garages when they may be awkward to access from the alley, and cost more than the alternatives of parking on the street or in the Northome lot. Perhaps reducing the on-street parking availability might result in increased tenant use of garage space.. ALTERNATIVES Given the information on the parking situation, the following alternatives come to mind: 1. Make no changes. i• occurred in the Northome lot. Encouraging more cars in the lot, especially overnight, might possib]_y exacerbate this problem by decreasing the visibility of the Northome lot for the police patrolling the area. Therefore, the staff has not suggested that the apartment owner/manager contact the owner of the Northome Shopping Center about formalizing this parking arrangement. .r 2. Post "no parking between signs five feet to the south of the McAllister driveway and five feet to the north of the furthest edge of the alley. This will increase visibility when McAllister's leave their driveway, thereby eliminating the safety hazard. It will leave two to three parking spaces for apartment residents adjacent to their residence. • 3 3. Post "no parking" signs from the alley south to California along the eastside of Arona, thereby, eliminating all parking adjacent to the McAllister home. This might result in 1) additional cars in the Northome lot; and/or 2) using the parking garages and/or 3) parking in front of the McAllister or neighbors homes along California. 4. Switch the parking on this section of Arona to the westside of the street between the driveway exits in the Northome lot and make the eastside of Arona between California and Larpenteur "no parking". Then no parking would exist by the apartments or the McAllister home. This might reduce the amount of on-street parking spaces, create a safety hazard due to right turns off of Larpenteur or out of the shopping center onto Arona, and reduce visibility into the Northome lot for the police patrols. • i• ,~ ~t~r-, ~, E 3 • I• March 16, 1990 To: From: Subject: City of Falcon Heights (Planning Commission; City Council) Colin and Susan McAllister 1513 California Avenue West (NE corner of Calif and Arona) Request for No Parking Zone on West Side of Residence ~i~;~ ' ~1 _ `,L2 ,l-~ We have lived, very happily, at 1513 California for the past three years. We would change very little with our situation here, but one aspect of life on this corner is becoming unbearable. Hopefully, you will be able to help us with our problem. Immediately behind us (facing Larpenteur) is a series of apartments. We are acquainted with the owner and some of the tenants, and find them to be very nice people. However, some of the tenant cars, parked alongside of our house (the western side-- along Arona) are a real trouble to us. Our reasons for requesting a "no parking zone" on this particular section of Arona (the only section where "no parking" is not enforced, to our knowledge, in the immediate area) are many and varied. Please allow us to explain. First, in the past three years, we have worked very hard to raise the value of our home, and thus the value of our Falcon Heights neighborhood. We have succeeded, by three independent appraisals, in doing so-- by $30,000. But having a used car lot outside our door really detracts from the appearance we have tried to create. Second, and more tangibly, we spend roughly X300 each year for flowers and lawn maintenance. This includes general fertilizers, etc., plus a whole row of salvia flowers along our fence each year. We are known in the neighborhood for these flowers, and they mean alot to us. As well, Falcon Heights has planted two mature trees on the Arona avenue, and we have planted two seedlings. The damage done each year to our landscaping efforts is really perplexing. It ranges from cigarette butts to glass in the grass (we have atwo-year old daughter who is discovering the joys of walking barefoot) to trash in general. Not to mention general trampling damage to the grass, and the loss of two seedlings and numerous salvias last summer, alone. We are really trying hard to make an ugly section of Arona (Northome) a little more pleasant, but it's a frustrating effort. Third, the nuisance of having cars parked along our house is annoying in every season. In the winter months, snow plows often miss our driveway section of the road altogether because the tenants have forgotten to move their cars off Arona. Each of the past three springs, I have manually swept up the gravel off of Arona caused by car owners not moving their cars on the designated day for the street sweeper. This costs me about two hours of my time, plus alot of nasty swearing. Not to mention our rubbish pickup costs. Whatever the season, the trash is really an eyesore-- people dump their ashtrays on our lawn or on the street. There is a non-stop supply of food wrappers, pop cans, and glass. Fourth, the parking of cars near our driveway is really a danger to us. Often we have had to manuver our way out of our driveway because the cars were simply parked too close to our ezit. This is not only maddening, but also severely limits our ability to view oncoming cars. We have often pulled out into someone else's way because we were not able to see their approach from the south. As well, our 10-year old Irish Setter was seriously hurt last autumn by a car whose driver failed to see her dart out from between the parked cars on Arona. We realize that a loose dog is obviously our fault as owners, but still, our mistake could have been easily compounded by the problems of the parked cars. And caused much more serious injuries-- to our dog and people in the car. Fifth, the noise factor. Cars come and go all day and all night. With very loud people, most of the time. I wish the driverslpassengers would come into our home and put our two-year old back to sleep each time they awaken her with their loud discussions! We recognize the fact that, on this corner, we can't observe total silence, but we do live in asemi-residential neighborhood, at least, and would appreciate others' observance of this fact. I'm sorry that I have rambled on in this manner. But this means much to us. We have worked for the past three years to improve our little corner of Falcon Heights, and hope that its governing body will return the favor. I don't think our request fora "no parking" zone is impractical. Often tenant cars park in the back Northome lot, and so hopefully more long-term arrangements can be made with Northome management. That lot is rarely more than 10 ~ full, ezcept perhaps far an hour or two on winter Saturday afternoons. So, there you are. We thank you for your consideration of our request. We enjoy living in Falcon Heights very much, and for your continual caring attitude. Sorry for being such pests!!! i• Sincerely, Colin and Susan McAllister (and Maddie) !t, ~~--~ l ~3 Meeting Date 12/17/90 Agenda Item E-4 C7 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM DESCRIPTION: Report on the duration of conditional use perms s SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Planner EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION: The Planning Commission requested that staff determine the duration of conditional use permits in the zoning code. City Attorney, Tom Gedde, was asked about this by telephone. He explained that it is ideal to have the conditional use permits expire when the business closes. However, the City of Falcon Heights code does not identify this as the expiration date. The city attorney will provide a statement about this for the December 17, 1990 meeting. For your information, the following sections of the state statutes and the zoning code are relevant to this discussion. STATE STATUTE 462.3595 SUBD. 3 DURATION • A conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the municipality from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS CHAPTER 9-15.04 SUBD. 1 (a) A conditional use permit shall applx to the use and land and not to a particular person or firm; any change in land ownership, lease, rental, occupancy or similar change shall not affect the permit or its conditions except as may be specifically authorized and required by the City. ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Review and discuss 2. Determine zoning code provisions to address the duration issue i• Meeting Date 12 17 90 Agenda Item - CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM DESCRIPTION: Planning Commission 1991 meeting schedule and re-appoin men s SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Planner EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION: Meetin Schedule T e P anning Commission meets the fourth Monday of each month unless a holiday falls on that day. 1991 Planning Commission Schedule January 28 February 25 March 25 April 22 May 20* (third Monday due to holiday) June 24 • July 22 August 26 September 23 October 28 November 25 December 16 (third Monday due to December 23) Re-Appointments Two Commissioners' terms expire in 1990, Commissioner Barry and Commissioner Flanagan. Commissioner Barry is completing his first three year term and may be re-appointed by the Council. Commissioner Flanagan served the Commission since March, 1985, which means he is not eligible to serve another full three year. term. However, if willing, he may serve for a total of eight years. ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Responses from Commissioners Barry and Flanagan concerning their re-appointments. i• Meeting Date 12/17/90 Agenda Item E-6 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM DESCRIPTION: 1991 Timetable for Planning Requests SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Planner EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION: Rezoning($50) Conditional Use ($20) Variance($20) Subdivision($25) Permitted Platting ($50) Access Use($20) PROJECT PROJECT PLANNING DUE DATE DUE DATE AGENDA OUT COMMISS ION MEETING an. an. an. 23 an. Feb. 5 Feb. 11 Feb. 19 Feb. 25 ar. 5 Mar. 12 Mar. 19 Mar. 25 r. 2 Apr. 9 Apr. 16 Apr. 22 Apr. 30 May 7 May 1 4 May 2 0 June 4 June 11 June 18 June 24 July 2 July 9 July 16 July 22 Aug. 6 Aug. 13 Aug. 20 Aug. 26 Sept. 3 Sept. 10 Sept. 17 Sept. 23 Oct. 8 Oct. 15 Oct. 22 Oct. 28 Nov. 4 Nov. 12 Nov. 19 Nov. 25 Nov. 26 Dec. 3 Dec. 10 Dec. 16 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Feb. 13 Feb. 27 Mar. 27 Apr. 24 May 22 June 26 July 24 Aug. 28 Sept. 25 Nov. 13 Nov. 27 Jan. 8 ACTION REQUESTED: For your information