HomeMy WebLinkAboutPCAgenda_90Oct22PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
October 22, 1990
7:30 p.m.
A. Call to Order
B. Roll Call
C. Approval of Minutes: August 27, 1990
D. City Council Minutes: September 12, 1990
E. REQUESTS, REPORTS, RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Request for a variance from 9-2.04(1)(c), the corner side
yard setback to construct a garage at 1457 Idaho in an R-1
zone.
2. Pre-application procedure for a subdivision of two existing
lots into three lots at 1794 Albert St. and 1800 Albert St.
in an R-1 zone.
3. Report on community land use planning forums held September
17 and 24, 1990.
4. Action on the City of Falcon Heights' Parking Policy.
5. Report on the City of Falcon Heights' 1991 Capital
Improvements Program (CIP)
6. Proposed addition to the zoning code governing garage and
boutique sales in residential zones.
7. Report on the city council policy review of Section 9-14.01
subdivision (b)(d) and (e) of the zoning code regarding rear
and side yard screening between business and residential
zones.
8. Planning Workshops.
F. ADJOURN
~ AGENDA ITEM C
.~
MINUTES
REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
AUGUST 27, 1990
7:00 P.M.
Meeting was called to order at 7:10 P.M. by Chairperson Boche.
pR F.SF.T7T
Barry, Boche, Finegan, Nestingen, Daykin, Duncan
City Planner Susan Hoyt
ABSENT:
Gibson Talbot
City Councilmember Paul Ciernia
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes of the July 23,1990 meeting were unanimously approved.
A REQUEST FROM MR. DONALD SWANSON FOR A PERMITTED ACCESSORY USE PERMIT
FOR A UTILITY SHED AT 1824 ASBURY IN AN R-1 ZONE.
City Planner Hoyt indicated to the commission that Mr. Swanson proposes
to construct a utility shed, 8 ft. x 8 ft. x 7 ft. tall in his rear
yard. The shed will be 5 ft. from the side lot line, 12 ft. from
the rear of his dwelling and approximately 29 ft. from the rear 7_ot
line. It will be painted cream color with a dark roof to match the ~~
house. The structure meets all the requirements in Section 9-2.04(1)(c)
and (i) of the Zoning Code. It does not require a building permit.
The Commission voted unanimously to grant the permitted accessory
use permit.
A REQUEST BY LOWELL ANDERSON FOR A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 9-13.02(3)(c)(4)
OF THE ZONING CODE REGARDING THE MAXIMUM AREA OF A BUSINESS SIGN
IN A B-2 ZONE, FOR FALCON HEIGHTS PHARMACY AT 1707 SNELLING AVENUE.
Mr. Anderson proposed to replace his existing business sign with
a sign of similar square footage, 123.75 square feet. The new sign
exceeds the 75 square foot maximum business sign allowed in a B-2
zone under Section 9-13.02(3)(c)(4) of the Zoning Code.
Mr. Anderson requested this variance due to the unique circumstances
described briefly as:
- ~ -
~r
(1) conformity with the adjacent sign of Design Modern Interiors
(2) necessity of capturing the attention of motorists on Snelling
to the regional medical supply nature of the business
(3) necessity of competing with the large AMOCO sign in the corner
of the shopping center
(4) necessity cf replacing the outmoded current sign to eliminate
the inefficient energy use of neon and to eliminate the large
word, "DRUGS".
The Commission voted unanimously to grant the variance based on the
unique circumstances governing Mr. Anderson's sign .selection in order
to promote his business.
REQUEST BY MS. PAULINE BOSS AND MR. DUDLEY RIGGS FOR A VARIANCE FROM
SECTION 9-2.04 (2)(d) OF THE ZONING CODE, REGARDING THE REAR YARD
SETBACK ON A THROUGH LOT, AND 9-13.04(6)(a), REGARDING DRIVEWAY ACCESS,
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DOUBLE GARAGE AT 1586 BURTON STREET IN
AN R-J_ ZONE .
City Planner Hoyt briefed the Commission on this request which involves
a portion of a home remodeling making the existing singJ_e car garage
into a study/guest room and creating a new double car garage. The
house is situated on a through lot. A variance from the 30 foot
rear yard requirement on a through lot is necessary for the project.
The current structure is 17 feet from the property line; the proposed
garage will be 5 feet from the line.
The unique characteristics governing this site are:
(1) The buildings along Burton are situated to conform
to the angle of the sideyard of 2190 FolwelJ_ to the
north of their property and, therefore, a sideyard
setback is really what exists.
(2) The proposed setback is in close conformance with
adjacent properties of 10 ft. or less to the north
and 9 ft. to the south.
(3) The unique topography, a hillside and several pines,
plus the location of neighboring homes make this plan
the least intrusive one.
After some discussion and presentation of the plans as drawn by the
architect, the Commission unanimously approved the variance from
Section 9-2.04(2)(d) regarding the rear yard setback on a through
lot, and also 9-13.04(6)(a), regarding driveway access. The approval
was given based on the unique topography and site characteristics
criteria as stated in Chapter 9-15.03 (Subd. 4) of the Municipal
Code, "Standards for Granting a Variance".
- 2 -
! ~
•
PLANNER'S REPORT
Susan Hoyt, City PJ.anner, delivered a brief overview of planning
activities she has been involved in over the past year. They are
as follows:
1. Making procedures thorough, consistent, understandable
and well documented.
2. Providing information on planning issues.
3. Becoming familiar caith the Zoning Code, identifying problems
and amending those that need immediate attention.
4. Creating a workable Parking Policy.
5. Addressing the City's future through Comprehensive Planning.
Commissioner Boche thanked Susan for her wor:c over the past year.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
The City Planner introduced Mr. Fred Hoisington, the consultant with
whom she has been working on the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mr.
Hoisington presented some of his preliminary planning information
and analysis to the Commission. He spoke of the upcoming "Community
Forums" to be held on September 17 and 24 in which the residents'
input will be received. Invitations will be mailed to approximately
200-300 residents on September 6th.
There will be small group discussions and open forum/reports. Dis-
cussion topics will include assets & opportunities, problems and
needs, issues and vision for the future.
The objective of these meetings is to obtain the community's goals
and incorporate those into the city's plan. Commissioners brought
up the impact of the State Fair and the University of Minnesota's
policy toward its agricultural land on the future of the city.
Mr. Hoisington stressed the importance of the- Planning Commission
attending both meetings, if at all possible.
PARKING POLICY
Planner Hoyt reviewed the draft of the Falcon Heights Parking Policy.
Some minor changes were made on page 5 under No. 2, "Procedures for
Designating Residential Permit Parking Areas".
- 3 -
•
Commissioner Boche suggested the policy be given to the City Attorney
for a general opinion that it complies with the law and also whether
~~
the po?.icy is 'defendable Planner Hoyt agreed to do this and suggested
the draft policy be placed on the October agenda for action.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 P.M.
Patricia Phillips
Acting Recording Secretary
Susan Hoyt, Ci 1 ner
- 4 - •
i•
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SEPTELIBER 12, 1990
Baldwin convened the meeting at 7:00 P.M.
ALL P4EMBERS P°,ESENT
Baldwin, Ciernia, Gehrz, Jacobs and Wallin.
Maurer, Ldiessner and Chenoweth.
ADDENDUM TO AGENDA
Also present were
Council added Item F(4), DeMartino Liability Claim, to the
Policy Agenda by unanimous consent.
MINUTES OF 8/22/90 APPROVED
The Minutes of August 22, 1990 were approved by unanimous consent.
APPROVAL OF COPdSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Council approved the following Consent Agenda items by unanimous
consent:
1. Disbursements
a. General Disbursement through 9/12/90, $112,097.94
b. Payroll 8/15/90-8/31/90,. $9,955.49
2. Commission Minutes
a. Parks & Recreation Minutes of 8/20/90
b. Planning Commission Minutes of 8/27/90
_~ 3. Approval of an Accessory Use Permit for Construction
of a Utility Shed at 1824 Asbury
--~ 4. Approval of a Variance to Allow Replacement of a Business
Sign at Falcon Heights Pharmacy, 1707 N. Snelling,
such Sign to Exceed the 75 Square Foot Maximum
_~ 5. Approval of a Variance to the 30 Foot Rear Yard Requirement
to Allow Construction of a Garage at 1586 Burton
6. Resolution R-90-35 Proclaiming 9/22/90 as National
Voter Registration Day
7. Licenses: Otterkill Plastering Co., A0588, Craig
Ridisell Construction, #0590, and Blaine Heating and
A/C, #0589_
J
~>(, CLEVELAND AVENUE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Maurer briefly commented on items in his letter dated September
5, 1990 relating to the final draft of the Cleveland Avenue
feasibility report. Dan Soler of Ramey County Public Works
reviewed the project which originally provided for a 52 foot
wide street with four traffic lanes which would allow no space
for a pathway without obtaining additional right-of-way from
the University of Minnesota. He explained that the Minnesota
Department of Transportation anticipates amending their design
standards which would allow decreasing the width of the street,
.and the County's proposal for Cleveland Ave. has been amended
to provide for construction of a 48 foot roadway .with two traffic
lanes and a center turn lane. This would allow space for a s
pathway on the east side of Cleveland without obtaining additional
right-of-way and would address the City of Roseville's objection
to a four lane roadway. The amended plan would increase the
cost to Falcon Heights due to the fact that the County funding
policy provides for payment of 1000 of travel lanes but only
25% for shoulders. The increased cost to the City for the
narrower roadway would be approximately $39,000. Council discussed
whether or not it was prudent to construct a pathway at a cost
of $39,000, and other possible options. Following the discussion
Jacobs moved, seconded by Wallin, that Ramsey County be requested
to come back with a design for a 52 foot roadway, striped for
• two lanes, with a center turn lane which would reduce the City's
financial responsibility. Upon a vote being taken the following
voted in favor thereof: Jacobs, Gehrz and Wallin, and the
following voted against the same: Baldwin and Ciernia. Motion
carried.
HAf9LINE AVENUE PROJECT TO BE DISCUSSED AT 9/26/90 COUNCIL MEETING
Baldwin asked Mr. Soler why Hamline Avenue, which is scheduled
for reconstruction in 1991, could not be narrowed to 48 feet
if the criteria is being amended. Soler replied that it would
require preparing new plans which would be costly and that
the County has some time constraints in using their bonding
funds. Council requested that the item be placed on the next
Council Agenda.
DeMARTINO LIABILITY CLAIM TO BE SUBMITTED TO CITY'S INSURANCE
CARRIER
Baldwin explained that Marvin DeMartino, 1345 W. California,
has submitted a claim to the City for repair of the sewer line
at his residence. Mr. DeMartino was of the opinion that the
City should pay for the repair as the break was in the area
where the cast iron pipe from the house connected to the clay
pipe installed by the City in 1958. He also felt it was damaged
by heavy equipment at the time Hamline Avenue was reconstructed
,,..
lained that the present City Code stipulates
in 1986_ Baldwin exp p y airs to the
that the property owner is res onsible for an rep
line from the building to the main sewer and this requirement
has been in effect since 1972 wheS fromnthat meeting indicateded.
He also explained that the m_nu owner responsible for the
the intent was to make the property
stub. Mr. Deyartino was in atseodsibility andithatethellinelief
that th~ cost is the City s re P construction o~ Hamline.
was damaged by heavy equipment during
He also felt that the intent oortliabilityninsurancegue. Wiessner
explained that the City pays f ~ claim to the insurance
and the normal procedure is to gresent ant
lit on the
company for them to determine if there is liabi y
art. of the City or Ramsey County~hesdiscussionneL"•rVeDeMartinoruction
p ro ect. Following t
was a County p ~
was advised that the matter will be submitted to the insuranc
ossible and that Staff will obtain an opinion
company as soon as p
on the wording of the Ordinance.
KSHOP SCHEDULED FOR CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S PERFORMANCE REVIEW
WOR
Wiessner explained the proposed process and requested that
each Councilmember complete the appraisal sheet for discussion •
at a workshop. Council agreed to the procedure and scheduled
the workshop for September 26, 1990, 5:30 to 7:00 P.M.
FUNDS TO BE TRANSFERRED TIES CONFERENCEY TO FUND ATTENDANCE
AT NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CI
Baldwin explained that if aes Conferencebitswalllbe necessary
the National League of Cite
to transfer funds to ossibleheCi~rnia thenlmovedgthatefunds
to attend if at all p Fund in an amount sufficient
be transferred from the Contingency
to cover casts for attendancenanimouslytional League of Cities
Conference. Motion carried u
Tom Baldwin, Mayor
ATTEST:
I
i
i
Shirley Chenoweth
City Clerk
Meeting Date: 10 22 90
Agenda Item: E-1
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Request for a variance from 9-2.04(1)(c), the
corner side yard setback to construct a garage at 1457 Idaho in
an R-1 zone.
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Dave and Grace Gorringe, Property Owners
Susan Hoyt, City Planner
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
Mr. and Mrs. Gorringe of 1457 Idaho are requesting a variance of
14 ft. 6 inches from the fifteen foot corner side yard setback
required in Section 9-2.04(1)(c) of the zoning code to construct
a new 24' by 24' garage on the same site as the existing garage.
ATTACHMENT 1 - Letter stating reasons for variance, 10/4/90
ATTACHMENT 2 - Site Plan for proposed garage at 1457 W. Idaho
ATTACHMENT 3 - Planner's report on the request for a variance for
1457 Idaho
ATTACHMENT 4 - Standards for granting a variance
ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Review and discuss
2. Approval due to the unique characteristics of the site.
~ ,~,({,,,~~r 1
•
October 4, 1990
Sue Hoyt - City Planner
City of Falcon Heights
Falcon Heights, Mn.
Dear Sue,
I would like to apply for a variance so that I can build a new 2-car garage
where our existing one car garage now rests.
The main reason for the 2-car garage is to get both of our cars off the street
to prevent vandalism, to prolong the life of the cars, and to make our corner
lot safer. Curr~tly one of our cars impedes visibility of local traffic and
children when it rests in the driveway or on the street.
We feel we need the variance so that we can build the new garage the same 16
feet from the curb and one foot from the alley for several reasons:
1. We have a small backyard which we do not want to make smaller.
i 2. We have two children and a large dog who use the backyard daily.
3. We have expensive shrubbery, fencing, and a large tree that would be
eliminated if we had to build further into the yard.
4. We have a permanently cemented-in children's gym/swing/playhouse that
would have to be eliminated.
5. Because of the reasons above, we don't feel an alley entrance would work.
I am planning to match the aluminum siding to the siding on our house so that
the garage will blend in and enhance the look of our neighborhood.
Please approve this variance as soon as possible as I would like to complete
construction this fall.
Sincerely,
Dave and Grace Gorringe
1457 Idaho Ave. W.
646-0120
•
-~ ~~a0
~,
;, ~
_ ' ~ -i~'
-ro cvr~a
I ~- ~~' r
~~
I~
D
I ~
I
._-~ --
~~
N
~~ ~
t5
~X t 5--r~ nl ~
~~ ~~~ ~
--_---
~.. ~ , ~ -.
~ ~iv+ ~~ Cam' L ~C
CHPr~~ N~ ren~~ I
~~~ C
1~
~ C
C~ILD's ~ ~~
~Y ~ ~
s~-~~
C~""~ ~
(~
.~, ~~
~~,
~'.'4~-k
~~~~
-i +
n
`.~~
r-..,
~ ~
CEcv1~' ~ .~
t~T) ° -~~
~~
~:
~!
tt''
~l E' ~'~' S=~,
~~s7 TQ ~ ~~~ ~ , j
~-~iza
f
s, - --
Meeting Date 10-22-90
Agenda Item E-1
Attachment 3
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Susan Hoyt, City Planner
RE: Request for a variance from 9-2.04(1)(c), the corner
side yard setback from 1457 W. Idaho
The Gorringe's are requesting a variance of 14 ft. 6 inches from
the 15 ft. minimum corner side yard setback required in 9-
2.04(1)(c) of the zoning code. The variance is necessary to
construct a new 24 ft. by 24 ft. garage with the garage entrance
in the same location as the existing garage.
Mr. Gorringe explained, and site inspection confirms, that moving
the garage back 15 ft. from the property line, or re-directing
the entrance toward the east parallel to the alley, would require
removing the playground, landscaping, fence, and tree. The
• proposed garage conforms to other setbacks on the street. The
variance appears to meet all standards for granting a variance in
9-15.03.
~' ~ - ~ PLANhTING AND DEQELOPI~NT 9-15.03
•
Subdivision ~}. Standards for Granting of Var;:ance. -No variance shall
be granted unless the City Council shall make without qualification on
the basis of evidence presented at the meeting the following findings:
a. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the
public welfare;
b. That the granting of the variance kill not substantially
diminish or impair property values or improvements in the area;
c. That the granting of the variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights;
d. That the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light
and air to adjacent property; ~ .
e. That the variance will not impair the orderly use of the public
streets;
f. That the variance will not increase the danger of fire or
endanger the public safety;
kig. -iThether the shape, topographical condition or other similar
characteristic of the tract is such as to distinguish it _
-~ substantially from all of the other properties in the zoning
district of which it is a part, or whether a particular hardship, as
. distinguished from mere inconvenience to the owner, would result if
.the strict letter of the Chapter were carried out;
. ~. Ti~hether the variance is sought principally to increase financial
.gain to the owner of the property,~and to determine whether a
substantial hardship to the owner would result from a denial of the,
- variance;
i. jihether the oonditions which give rise to the application for
the variance arose after the adoption of this Chapter of the Code of
- the-City of-Falcon Heights or any amendment thereto which placed the
tract in a zoning district different from what it Bras tinder the
Chapter. In the consideration of this item,-the City shall make -
diligent inquiry as~to all changes in the property end shall refuse
to~grant-the-variance if the problem is one that can be solved
through a proper application of a-conditional use permit-or as
amendment of the Zoning code.-~-Financial hardship shall-not be a
basis for the granting of a-~r-arianee when the owner purchased the
property in reliance on~a promise that a variance Would be granted, ,
and the City shall dismiss the-appeal if it shall appear that the -
property was purchased on such reliance.
Subdivision 5. Conditions. The Citp may attach such conditions to
the grant of the variance as it shall determine will be necessary or
desirable to bring it within the purpose and intent of the Chapter. A
. public record shall be maintained of such conditions.
.April 29, 1991
MEMO:
TO: File
1800 Albert and 1794 Albert
RE: Subdivision
Planner Tim Malloy called to say that according to the City's
zoning code 9-2.03 on lot provisions, the subdivision as
proposed by Weber and Warkentien cannot be done.
•
Meeting Date: 10-22-90
Agenda Item: E-2
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Pre-application for a subdivision of two lots
into three lots at 1794 and 1800 Albert St. in an R-1 zone.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mr. Willis Warkentien, property owner of 1794
Albert St.
REVIEWED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Planner
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
On behalf of his neighbor, Mr. Weber of 1800 Albert St. and
himself, Mr. Warkentien submitted a pre-application for a
subdivision of the rear yards of two existing lots on 1794 and
1900 Albert St. into a third lot on Garden Avenue.
The pre-application procedure is designed to give Mr. Warkentien
an opportunity to explain his proposal to the Planning
Commission.
ATTACHMENT l: Warkentien letter dated 10/4/90
ATTACHMENT 2: Plat map with lots
ATTACHMENT 3: Site plan of proposed subdivision
ATTACHMENT 4: Planner's preliminary report on the proposed
subdivision
ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Review and discuss
A~~i ~~~ 1
1794 North Albert Street
Falcon Heights, MN 55113
October 4, 1990
Susan Hoyt
City Planner
City of Falcon Heights
2077 W. Larpenteur Avenue
Falcon Heights, MN 55113-5594
Re: Subdivision of Lots 43 and 44, Larpenteur Villas
Dear Mrs. Hoyt:
We are enclosing the sketch of the plan to create a third lot
on the rear 100 feet of lots 43 and 44.
We propose a 100 foot by 146.79 foot lot to run North and
South and open onto Garden Avenue.
Lot number 44 is owned by Donald and Mitzi Weber and lot
number 43 is owned by Willis and Cornelia Warkentien. Both
owners desire this proposed creation of a new (3rd) lot.
As shown, the proposed lot will be 100 feet in width and
146.79 feet in length. Lot 44 will remain 68.55 feet in width
but will be reduced in depth by 100 feet to 195.40 feet.
Lot 43 will remain 78.21 feet in width and be reduced in depth
to 195.40 feet. All three lots will emceed 10,000 square feet
in size.
As you requested in your letter of September 12, 1990, I have
prepared an additional plat showing the placement of the
buildings on each lot. Each home is situated 60 feet back
from the front property line and 74 feet back from the East
edge of Albert Street.
Thank you for your cooperation in presenting this proposal to
the City Planning Commission.
Sincerely,
Donald Weber
Willis Warkentien
i•
• ~ ~ '~ E ktsT, NG ~uE~
V~trt~- ~~lu,
13z, i 33.L'a 87.8 ~'~ ro0~1' li2bi rl_ 197~4i 13°1301 1'DS ~f` ~12D.14 143 ~ .GIiG ~1b 11
1 a.~t• 334.x•+. _ ... wb.w• :- l ~ 4
~- ~ R UGGLES v ~ AV E. ~ ~ °a9~ °~° m ~'~c a (~) 23. m
~ '
+_
~ 12(91)
B.19 it. ~ ~
1 --~,•;
(8g)4 i0
r 19~~) • t39° ~81~
~ .IS a.e. •w
SC 0
}
~ • ~ ~
" (131)
bT'
~~,pp
Q
.. •
° wZ~ V
~
Cam')
15
; ~ 3_Se
Ig ' SCHOOL• DISTRICT N0. 623
• •ZSU,
,1
r75) (
'
Q 17~) ~2TG
.zsa~.
J s ~(
4)
. a
e 7
la~n
). .2s a.a.
lJ ~~)~
. Z_j.~,~ .. ~ .2SJI.e.
c __
... .a .AI ' .1 -_
las. e, _
t) (se) I v
(ac) 2~:
~ !s-A ~
.;,~ ~ /_ 1
~9s 40'
1
(I) X95.40• .M
~
~. ~ tTr). ~
.. .
•ti (M} (5)
e •• (~) (6~ ~ ~ • b'
2
~~'
N (~) ~
2 (8j ~'
(37) 2 (9)
(36) ~ a (Ip)
• w
w
~~) ~ ! - 3o.tN ~ w
- --frs = z (1t~~ 4
(34) ~2 M • -.___ .
.121 3
. (33~ i
i1
2
~•
~.-h¢ - (13) 5 w
i
Q ~-~ yZ
~'^'~~ ~~ --
f151 a ~ ~~.yj r> ~. ~, ..
N .
(29] ,L (1~1. v
I ~__b
4
« ... 4 33' 3 4th o• ~
:. (Z7} ( ~ . '. ~ ~.
1.
)
~` rz~) ;
''
,~
ti ' a to ~ .9 _.~t •a
-.- 3) - ~b (~1 (moo' o (62) . S
` 43 ~~ pis
~ a a o ' its..
~ o~eo~w 0 2 $
~ 3 u.
~63,
l~l
` I /,
~1 v 1.12 k. ~~) ~
21~: 1 L - -
~ - E
O
37 _
.
~/a, • .Og g2' !•L' ii'
1
..
.
`.. (114 .~
N 1~ ICHE
2 ~..
S3
4 R
~
33 . s a a~ en at' sr
~ 43
i,
~.
f ~ 4i
65 .. .. .. .. .. ..
"~ (93') (9~l i9s) C5G% X97) (9aJ Cgs)
is ~91)
M
~. -~
2
3
4
5
6
~ 8
O
"(9~ R ~ S E
5%.
se.2a Gsti
.,,
n
1 N
'
'
I
4
s 4
~
~ ~
ul-.
~
•~0
183'
~t4 (51) m
>a3• ~ ~
(52} 1 ~ (53
^
_
~ a 13 (`~~ `^
m 6zT .L
z
s Cs4~
w:
i ~
..
IZ (`~~ : - -
3 (55.
.~
J a ~
~ ~
~
11 (481' --
f 4 (56)
:, J.
v ~es•
ie
~
~.
Io (4'7) 1 z'
~51)
I
y3 3 ~~ ~
c. ~' O~.~s W
. ~
4~ N G yt
~.w~. _ (~k51 ro
i8S'
° 2 ~
~ ~ n) ~
.
'M
~~
,~ a•
3 ~t
~Q
~ e
4SD. 80°K~1279
BOUNTY OF R.
u+ .4.55 •
Y °~.
:G° ~ ,-~I~ l0'1~ •.~ \ X17
.utr-~' 3
~a rg L .S~ v~1.eE f ~r~ E ~s ~ 3, .~6 /. ~b6
~ .. / X6.7 9
Pry ~ Pv~~9 ~ at .~
boa ` X f~,G. 79 ' ~ ~~
~~ `79 s~uq~q~ ~ ~~
•
rc1 .~ ~
~aT N-~f- ~ ~aT ~$
~~.s~' .~ /9S~' 78,x/ x i~-f~
13, boa., S~~ ~~. FT /S~ ~'~.. ?~'~' ~~ F f
0
c
c` dtl G.+QVR~
/Idas~
,~ ~i4RAC E
S'~ a~ `x.z~' v -
3 ~ X fit'
o ,
•~~
iJmu-sue
it,Z~X„tR'
6 GA~~
~~
9~`
3v' x
~ I
O
• \
~~
Gl~e~~ s Gr~14-R KF'Nr~ Ei/ 3
t £~o o •4 I ~-e~fi- I -? ~ ~ .4 l be..fi
0
Sc~tGG
l~ "'= .r
'_ ~~
r~
•
MEMORANDUM:
Meeting Date 10-16-90
Agenda Item E-2
Attachment 4
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Susan Hoyt, City Planner
RE: Information on the Proposed Subdivision of the Two Lots at
1794 and 1800 Albert Street into Three Lots
The following information is relevant to Mr. Warkentien's pre-
application for a subdivision of 1794 and 1800 Albert Street.
1. Subdivision of lots 43 and 44 of Larpenteur Villas into
three lots. Two will be developed. One will be vacant.
2. Lot Size:
a. Existing:
Lot 43 = 78.21 x 295.40 = 23,103.23 sq. ft.
Lot 44 = 68.58 x 295.40 = 20,258.53 sq. ft.
b. Proposed:
Lot 43 = 78.21 x 195.40 = 15,282.23 sq. ft.
Lot 44 = 68.58 x 195.40 = 13,400.53 sq. ft.
New Lot = 100 x 149.79 = 14,679 sq. ft.
3. Conformance with lot size cri teria for single family
dwelling in the zoning code:
a. Lot area:
The minimum lot area is 10,000 sq. ft. All three lots
substantially exceed this minimum.
b. Lot width:
Interior lots. The minimum interior lot width is 75 ft.
The interior lots, proposed lot 43 and the new Garden
lot meet this criterion.
Corner lots. The minimum corner lot in a new
subdivision is 90 ft. The proposed lot 44 falls short
of this requirement by 21 sq. ft.
4. Setbacks of existing structures on proposed lots.
The proposed lots 43 and 44 will already be built up since
they are currently occupied with single family dwellings and
will remain there. These structures meet all the setback
requirements of the zoning code. Their location on the lot
should not impact the required setbacks of a new structure
on the proposed Garden lot.
1
~~ ~ t I
5. Public Utilities.
Public sewer and water are already connected to lots 43 and
44. New sewer and water connections would be necessary to a •
new structure along Garden. Electricity and telephone hook-
ups would be necessary. However, the availability of these
services to adjacent properties should make this fairly
simple.
6. Access
Access to the new lot is directly south off of Garden
Avenue.
7. Impact on adjoining neighbors.
Neighboring property owners will view a house rather than
open space from their rear yard.
8. Conformity with adjacent lots and lots within the immediate
area.
The proposed subdivision of two large lots at the north end
of the block between Albert Street and Hamline Avenue will
create three smaller lots. The lots on the east side of
Albert and west side of Hamline are unusually long,
approximately 250 feet, with the exception of the lots along
Larpenteur.
There are examples of similar small sized lots within the •
adjacent blocks to this proposed subdivision.
9. Conformity with comprehensive plan.
The current comprehensive plan does not specifically address
subdividing of existing lots for single family homes.
Subdividing existing lots may increase the number of
households in the city and add new housing stock to a
developed community. It may also create a mish-mash of
inconsistent lots and higher than desired density on some
blocks. Therefore, it will be useful to address these type
of requests with policies, followed by a subdivision
ordinance of existing lots.
The Commission's comments upon Mr. Warkentien's proposal and
experience with these requests will assist me in reviewing this
request and preparing a larger policy document and, possible,
ordinance.
2
Meeting date: 10-22-90
Agenda Item: E-3
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Report on the Community Land Use Planning
Forums held on September 17 and 24, 1990
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Susan Hoyt, City Planner
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
Approximately sixty residents and business persons attended the
two community planning forums to provide their thoughts about the
community. These comments are being used in preparing goals for
the comprehensive plan.
ATTACHMENT 1 - Summary of citizen comments from the two ccmmunity
forums .
ACTION REQUESTED:
For your information
•
FALCON HEIGHTS
2077 W. LARPENTEUR AVENUE FALCON HEIGHTS, MN 55113-5594 PHONE (612) 644-5050 FAX (612) 644-8675
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 5, 1990
TO: City Council, Planning Commission, Staff
FROM: Susan Hoyt, City Planner
RE: Catalogued Responses To Topics From The Two Community
Planning Forums
The attached sheets list all the groups' comments to questions
about the city discussed at the community forums.
The comments are not prioritized, nor do they necessarily
demonstrate unanimity. They will be used to prepare the goals
for the comprehensive plan.
If you have questions about the process used or the comments,
I'll be happy to talk to you.
SH/ds
attachment
.~
•
HOME OF THE MINNESOTA STATE FAIR AND THE U OF M INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURE
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
~~~
9/1'x/90
SUMMARY OF FIRST COMMUNITY LAND USE PLANNING FORUM
• COMPILED FROM GROUP RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONS
(The answers are not prioritized).
QUESTION 1: WHAT ARE FALCON HEIGHTS STRENGTHS? ITS ASSETS?
* Small town atmosphere in a metropolitan area
* Proximity to both St. Paul and Minneapolis
* Stable, attractive residential neighborhoods
* Responsible, active, friendly residents
* Accessible, open city government
* Some businesses, but not too commercial
* Good schools
* Good public services
* Good housing stock
* High property values
* Lots of open space (fields, playgrounds, parks,
* University of Minnesota (employment, open space,
environment)
* State Fair Grounds (open space,identity)
* Gibbs Farm
* Diversity of ages in population
* Safe
* Wildlife
* No industrial pollution
golf course)
college
~CTESTION 2: WHAT ARE ITS WEAKNESSES? ITS PROBLEMS AND NEEDS?
* Lack of civic identity
* Limited tax base (much land is non-taxable)
* No open land for development
* Small size difficult to maintain independent services
* Divided elementary school boundaries in east & west part of City
* Population decline in number of people per household
* State Fair traffic (note disagreement)
* Unstable businesses in commercial area
* Access to commercial property difficult
* SE Corner of Larpenteur and Snelling (Northome, Clark's, Pizza Hut)
* Aesthetic improvements needed along Snelling, Larpenteur and
Cleveland
* Barrier between east and west Falcon Heights created by Snelling
* Inconsistency in traffic flow along streets (e.g. Fairview 40 mph)
* Proximity to extensive, expanding commercial development in
Rosedale/Har Mar area
* Failure of the Stratford Office Park (land by city hall)
* Above ground wires for telephone, NSP, cable disrupt neighborhood
aesthetics
* Lack of sidewalks (strong disagreement)
* University property behind the greenhouses poorly maintained
QUESTIONt 3: HOL WADTT THECITYUTO GROW?ROUT GROWTH PSTD CF..ANGE? HOW DO ~ ,
YO
* Grow only to enable financing city services
* Growth not an end objective •
* No need to grow, improve the existing city
* Grow by adding younger families into existing housing
* Keep the small town and current character of the city
* Keep existing businesses
* Develop a better commercial area - improved access, signing,
walkways
* De-emphasize retail expansion
* Increase business, cffice, possibly light manufacturing uses (wish
no pollution)
* Emphasize and maintain the residential neighborhoods
* No more multi-family housing
* Expand existing bike trails
* Consider a "low-impact, cosmetic" overhead pedestrian wal?{way over
Snelling
* P_dd trees and foliage along Snelling to reduce noise level
* No curbs
QUESTION 4: WHAT IS THE CITY'S PRESENT IDENTITY? SHOULD IT CHANGE?
IF SO, HOW?
* University of Minnesota and the State Fair either identify Falcon
Heights or usurp Falcon Heights' identity
* No need to change identity, prevent deterioration
* To insiders: a small, quiet community - a well-kept secret
* To outsiders: a bedroom community in the metro area
* Strong identity among residents and neighborhoods
* Need more PR on how nice it is here, possibly using identification
by street signs
* Need a landmark or a center to define the area such as the school
QUESTION 5: HOW DOES YOUR GROUP FEEL ABOUT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT?
TAX BASE? INDUSTRY?
* Limited land available for development
* Necessary to maintain financial viability
* Improve and redevelop existing facilities, commercial properties
* Economic development with businesses with low environmental impact
such as small business, office buildings and possible light
manufacturing
* Develop vacant land by city hall
* Property tax incentives to maintain and improve property
QUESTION 6: DEALER'S CHOICE?
* Do neighborhood planning
* This is a good place to live, keep the city working well
•
10/3/90
SUNIIKARY OF SECOND COMMUNITY LAND USE PLANNING FORUM
COMPILED FROM GROUP RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS
(The answers are not prioritized)
QUESTION 1: WE ARE INTERESTED TO KNOW HOW YOUR GROUP FEELS
ABOUT THE FOLLOWING AS THEY RELATE TO FALCON
HEIGHTS:
a. Environmental protection?
* No additional pollution
* Reduce air pollution at major intersections like Snelling
& Larpenteur and Hamline & Larpenteur
* More hazardous waste clean-ups
* Encourage recycling
* Encourage saving and replacing trees .
* Consider the environmental impact of any redevelopment and
new development including transportation
* No heavy industry
•
b. University of Minnesota agricultural .lands?
* Preserve them as they are
* Consider beautification along the edges of the fields
* Be prepared for a contingency plan if ownership changes
such as:
- consider keeping the land as open space
- consider revising the current zoning to include business
use along Larpenteur and possibly multi-family use
- consider single family housing
c. Adequacy of public services?
* Generally very adequate
* Improve tree trimming and grass maintenance
* Provide curbside leaf pick-up
* Consider organized or integrated garbage collection
(almost a complete consensus)
* Maintain independent haulers
* Evaluate the police and emergency services
* Improve drainage on Lindig Street
* Underground wiring of power, telephone, cable throughout
the city
* Keep level of service provision equivalent to other north
suburban communities
d. Parks, recreation, open space, trails, etc.?
* Dramatically improve the "hole" in the Northome
~~
neighborhood
* No net loss of park space
* Provide a wading pool
* Provide a firepit
* Increase supervised recreation activities, especially ice
skating
* Improve traffic control at Cleveland and Roselawn by the
1
y>
community park
* Improve the bikeway and walkway system via painted bike
lanes, signs and linkages to other cities' bike paths
* Purchase community park from the University
e. Redevelopment? •
* Redevelop the southeast corner of Larpenteur and Snelling
Consider an office park or a restaurant and nice motel or
light manufacturing
* Encourage homeowners to remodel and upgrade existing homes
* No multi-story development
* Improve the use and maintenance of the University property
behind the greenhouses on Cleveland Avenue
f. Traffic? Light Rail transit (LRT)?
* Enforce speed limits and reduce speed limit on Fairview
* Reduce or control traffic on Snelling, possibly by working
with the county
* Traffic light at Fairview and Larpenteur (in the works)
* Improve mass transit availability
* Skybridge over Snelling to expedite pedestrian crossings
* Light Rail Transit must be carefully studied to see if it
is worth the expense
- LRT will inevitably be disruptive to the community
regardless of its location
- Prefer emphasizing other modes of mass transit to LRT
- If LRT is an inevitable necessity consider locating it
along Cleveland Avenue to Co. Rd. B (not unanimous)
otherwise Snelling Avenue is the logical and preferred •
route (many groups did not address a specific route for
LRT, but commented on its expense and questionable
benefit)
g. Heritage preservation?
* Generally, preserve the heritage the city currently enjoys
* Continue to preserve the Gibbs Farm site
* Consider a local ordinance to acknowledge or preserve the
University Grove neighborhood which represents over sixty
years of a planned and architecturally designed community.
h. State fairgrounds?
* "We like it", "We live with it", "Preserve it"
* Oppose the construction of any major public facilities on
the site including a 60,000 seat stadium
* Be pro-active in visualizing what might be there if the
fairgrounds moves
i. Housing?
* Continue current height restrictions (3 story)
* Encourage good quality rental housing with enough parking
* Preserve the current housing mix
* If development occurs encourage single family dwellings if •
they are marketable
2
r~ ~M
•
j. Neighborhood conservation?
* Maintain the existing neighborhoods
* Leave as much existing open space as possible, do not
develop all existing open space
* Encourage neighborhoods to develop own identity through
associations, block parties and neighborhood watch
* Enforce the city codes to maintain neighborhoods
* Consider an ordinance to restrict the rental and
subdivision of single family dwellings
k. Community cohesiveness? Is it "together"?
* People are neighborly and open
* Cohesive because no "burning" issues divide us
* There are physical barriers, but still community spirit
* Foster more communitywide events and classes
* Consider expanding social services such as childcare
QUESTION 2: IF YOU COULD VISUALIZE THE FALCON HEIGHTS OF YEAR
2,000, WHAT WOULD YOUR GROUP WANT TO SEE?
oriented and service oriented
* If the University sells the agricultural land, the land
should be single family homes
* Beautification of Snelling, Larpenteur and Cleveland
Avenues
QUESTION 3: WHAT THREE THINGS ARE MOST IMPORTANT TO REALIZING
YOUR GROUP'S YEAR 2,000 VISION?
* More or less the same visage as now, major change would be
a detriment
* Thriving community with its own identity
* An improved urban landscape (nice, signs, street lights,
buried wires)
* A stable, well maintained business community and
residential neighborhoods
* Lower property taxes
* Limited skyscrapers on the University campus
* Developed park at Idaho and Snelling
* LRT along Snelling Avenue (not agreed that LRT is useful)
* SE corner a new development, possibly small-scale, niche
* No development of University lands
* No development of the Minnesota State Fair grounds
* Contingency plan if University and State Fair lands change
* Redevelopment of the SE corner of Larpenteur and Snelling
* No decrease in parks or open space
* Stable, well planned economic development including
attracting and maintaining good businesses in the
commercial district
* Involve adjoining residents in discussing development
proposals
* Sound management
* Financial resources
* Involved residents
* Good property values
* Commitment from the city
3
Meeting Date: 10-22-90
Agenda Item: E-5
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Review of and recommendation on the City of
Falcon Heights proposed Capital Improvements Program for 1991
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Staff
City Council
Staff
City Council
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
In order to meet state statutes and involve the Planning
Commission in the budget planning process for public
improvements, the City Council requests the Planning Commission
to review, comment upon and recommend the attached Capital
Improvements Program (CIP) for 1991.
Tom Kelly, City Accountant, will be present to discuss this.
ATTACHMENT 1 - CIP, 1991
ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Review and Discuss
2. Recommend to City Council
i • H
w
c~
ca
at
•
A
z
a
w
H
Z
W
E
W
O
a
a
E
H
a
Q
H
H
a
U
O
O
W
O
a
0
a
a
r-;
r
H
T=.
r-~
L=7
2
O
cJ~
[=a
H
..r
C7
H
[-.~ H
W
C7
z r.~
o a
U t~
G ~
rr-~-H O~
~=1
~"~
H
H
U
H
2
H
Q ¢
a Q
O
H
H
~+
H
cn
G=7
Q
H
H
H
H
U
Q
C
b
r-t
a
c
a,
a~
0
s~
a
E
H
.,~
~,
U
.~
w
ca
H
2
ru
O
v
H
a
d
Z
6
C
O
.,~
.,a
.~
.~
a
~'
U
b
N
O
4-I
G
N W
rp ,SG
•~+ ~+
~ +~
r0 CL
~~
C C
•r-t td
~~
N ~
U1 G
_~
~7
4-1 •.-1
a
~ ~
~~
.~
NU
?~ O
~~
.~
v~
me
~ a~
~~
v
~>
~o
s~ s~
•~ Q,
~.t
U •~
~~
~ C
N
c
o ~
a.J N
U ~
N N
W U
y~
•~ a
~~
H ~:
_~
•
•
(WrJ J II
¢¢'
{- F-
IJ ~
~ LL
n~
J
a
O
H
U]Cn2~n
I ';+
M W M M I -+
.+ n I
I
I
I
1
~,~ i iJ ~~ I ~ U
.~ a] U7 ~.~ I ~ U
~.:, m t0 !~ I 1
tU~?JOJIL I S
-+tp-+S I M
fsJ 1 f•]
O 'J V
I :~ I
I O U? I f•i
W I U7 w' .. J
+ I '._+
C n ~~
1 f•] I f•]
~ q I .y I CU
'- w 1 I
~ W I I
li Z I
I
f
i I
I
I
I
m .ti t~? i0
i I
_
1
W 1 i,p W n m I
!7 i tU U? I
a I I
U G7 4- I i
W w l I
U L1 U I
~ I
Z Z C I I
a w l I
z 2
~ 1
I I
I
+
11 1
q I
a W _ •* ,~
~-+ W I ~'U I '"'J
U Z i O ':~ I n
I m ~A t`3 I ':~
ll7F-~s I !~!DnOJ I S
m W W q 1 I ~-+
*~E?W I I
I ~U?Z I I
O I 1
•.+ c I I
m a I I
m ~
•+ •+ I
1
I t
I
I
I
Z I ff
LJ 1 J
E I ~
W 1 ~
> I o
~ 1
~ I J ~.
a q l Z a
H ~ I H f--1
tL I z t- a
J I Q L1 a a
a I ;~ J U? W U
f- I HU1C
y I tIfA~sU J
a I ccWew
Q I F¢3C 'r
U I N ~
~Uo>, 4
-
I Z H
! l:J J
I E¢:SrtY
I q*-e~S
~t~.aa
I J t 0@ t 0 i L'?
I ~.~NU?S I t0
a I ~? I,? nJ n I •
zw I h?Mmo? t a
~ U i -+ M M I m
W ~ j
I
-~ J I I
T ~ I i
m w
.~ I
1
i I
I
I
I
1
N ~' .~ U7 I
I
I n '.~ ':r n 1 U?
q i O L•? O O I ~.
I S n!DL? 1 O
~ I '+ M O
l1 N I -~ 1 '?J
G I I
J W i 1
a lJ I !
F- Z 1 I
O I I
F- I
I
I I
I
I
I
U? '_ + U? 1
cn 1 n ~_ '~' n I ~~
q :~? I L•? U7 ' M I O
j m I _
I 1
W I I I
U I 1
a '? ~ i I
C m I I
W T j I
'+ I 1
~ - `~
I M ~' U? I OJ
q 1 n !~ M, !U I u7
Z i M Q I iU
u7 ~ L7 1 I -"
q 11 ,^.. I I
W W I !
w -W I I
z m z l I
1- T
+ 1
I 1
I
z . I
W I
I u7 M W M I
O
I t,? QJ 3 I
^ W l m ,_~ rr, M 1 f••
c J 1 m d m M 1 ~n
a w 1 ~D n m~ l a
[A a 1 ~ M U7 I --~
.+ q J I 1 •"
Z r I ~
J ~ ~ I I
? l1 ~ I
I
~+ a I I
n I I
I 1
U I I
F I
Z
W
E
W
D
a ~
M
J
a
i-
.r
a
a
U
W q
Z w ~+
W U1~1-
> Y U a
~ ~ J! W
~ O W ¢ J
a 3 C U a
Z W F-
M L
H F
J J W ~
a tS ~
~ Z ~ N
Wald
iZ ~
IW a
~ ;~ a
` ~ ,J ~~ rJ 1 •~ I V7 V7 Ir'1 ~D '3 I •+
Q 1 fl !~ ~.d rJ •~, I 'J I U7 ,,p r~ v 1 'J
~ I p .., .-, I N I ., ,-, r~ V7 I ,-,;
O I I~ 1 I~
F- ~
1
I
1
'J
'J I
I '1
1 '^ I
I
I
'J
'J I
''
I G
~ ^ I
Q I ._, I ,_5 I p
j .t .+ I V7 I V7 I !r7
W l ~
~ ~ j I I I
I I
I I
I
I _
~+
1 '^ I
I
V
J
'J
1 p "' III I v I •1 ~J I '~
I O I ~, ~ d
~~ 1 tU Q ,- J Q I Q' 1 1 I
I
.. .. I I
T I
~' I
1 I
I I
1 I
I
I I
1 I
I I
I
1 , , ,^. 1 .~ ,. I I N ~~ ~~ I '
d I m +~+ Q V7 1~ i ~?1 ~U lT I~
I I
,n I
~ 1
1 1
1 I 1
1
1
1
_ 1
1 _
I I
I
I
'; I
1
'J
' U
I ~ ~~ U
'/ 1 1
'
~
^ J
' I 'J
_ ^' \ I _ I _
'
' O I '~_
m
r+ 1
i ,
1 I
I I
I I
1
I
1 1
I I
I
_ I
1
I '"
~;~
m
'" 1
I
I
i I ^'
I
I I
I
I I
I •
v
1 r, r ~• .r I H 1 1 n I
!~~ I -, I I
I
.n
.., 1
1
I i
I I
I
I I
I
I
1 I
I I
I
I I
I
.-, L U7 I ~' Q1 -
3 1
I
U
Z Q^
iil I !!~ R7
l m m In
LT W I
Cj C W I .~ -+ •~ Z I
I
Z ~I Z I
r, W I ~
LL } I
1
2 I CfI r7 i
•rZ W I CCC I
UO CtLL I >>~ 1
H X 1"'1 1 1
u7 t- W J I '~ V7 1
~n ¢ i i'1 I
m ¢ I
., I- J i r,~ ,~, I ,
Ul Q I ,.~ - I
I ~-+ Z E- I ~7J f ~ ~ 1
'-+ rA I ICJ t` ':~ 1
,-' ,-i ~~ O I +-+ -+ 1
m .c ~ U I I
m^ 1 I
.-+ rl O I
I I
1
1
I
I
1
I
F-
rIl
I
i
I I I W U
I ~
1 I W I CJ W ~
tr, I 1 r.1 I Z > O
E 1 U_ I !T I ~-+ O !t1
W I i J i
U7 .. ,~ _ I O
I O I
I A
rc
~1
f',
I Z
'' >' ~ {' ~ Q 1 I~ Z
~
~ 1 N J '~
~
n
cn m
4 V1
1-
O
I J
I [I
I LL
I
lL
J U
Z
Q
'- I iA
I W W ••
l;J IL tr >, = W
L :! +:
LU IG
I •+
I CC
Q
A
Q .
I Z ;~ -N ~ ti k i N v. 0. > ,~ :=t U I U I W ¢ W I- W Z
~ ~
T j = ~ .~ ~ ,~ \ _ '~ ^! V- O 3 L t1
1
~ :I N f0 >•
T ;
y~ I Q
I Z I W
I u7 2
F J
[, n
Q E
Q U_
U l U 3 N r6 d~ N^ a i~ . r:
t~ y p a _ rr J
1 Q ills 3 F .,~ ~' y Q .a i~ W? L A C U ,y .., -• I r-, I O > U
I i eY d i x ++ ~. ~L U '~ '-+ U C~ U "- U > ~ O. I LL I >- \ O
1 W >. u +G ~!- r~ N~ ., y Z y ., W' L J L ~G C~ I I~ C7 W J O 1-
I W !- tY +> 3 `r- 0 W U 7 ++ U '~ .. W in c .~ 'L ~+ iL U 1 ~~ I I Q Z u 2 ~
a O
F
I U~ W N U 2 iU U I 1 E•- H Q tY
i Ea,...
.,,.
~.,~.,,.~.~ i
y...~_,. Z
~......,. I
i I N
i~ ^
o >
¢ W
w
n
I ~~o
QUUStLL7 a ~.
o¢mr~alli~
iRS,r~q
UL*Is,rjA
rn
x
[n
O
z
Q f
1
D I
1- i
1
•
iY A I
~ W 1
~ W I
!=1. Z I
U7 I
m s
-~1 I
i tD I ;D 1
r Ui Li h~ r~ ! m I
L~ s m r ~ I~ IJ I
rV 1?J ' ~D 1
I I
I i
_
v 1 !
1 I
! ,~, I
I I
~~
U7
U7 I 1
i !
O ^ ! Id I
1?J I f~ !
1 I
I I
I !
I 1
I ~~ 1
1 i
i S
i~ I r~
.t I
m
m
.,
r~
m
m
~,
iU
IT
it
_ j:u
P. iU
!;IJ
I tU
m
.~ !.!J
~
m r!J
(n
-•+ I
I
u I
I
I
Z G 1
H 1' 1 IJ'1 I !?J
U G Q I :' •d m
Z W 1 I~ lr C*
Q = W I --! -+ -~
Z 2 Z I
*~ W I
W 'r I
I
I r_n rn rn ,n
,-, • w I ~ ~ c ~:
J W s LL I » > >
- ~ x !-+ I
!0 U
W J
I _
I 1?J H 1~1J ti
mw
Y
~
I _
! !J
¢ I U7
I ~ Z F- I d
H W I CQ
~w rdu I u7
~1 H I
i
_ I ~~ I
I I
d I S I
h7 1 r'] I
I i
1 1
r~7
°7 1
I ~?J
S I OJ I
t•7 I P7 I
I r'7 I
I ~:!J
I
I
I
!-!J
= I •:u
~;~ I Id
1 !:u
i
I
I
I
nJ
U?
,^
L7
ro
A 1 ~*
1 !?J
1 ti0
r - Im
<-1 r~ I CIJ
I Id
1
I
I
~~ I v
! ~~
~ I u]
1 r~
I
I
_ I ,~
~.~ 1
r I S
h) I r~
I ~._+
d I d
r•7 1 f•7
I
I
1
I
i
:* i '~
r) I r~
iU _. _ !?J
vi S 1 !?J
!:U I 1•)
C'J I !:U
I
I
;, ~
_ I
I
I
!:u !•) 1 ~
_ I C!J
~+ LL O 1
I i
I
i
I
I I
I i
r
n
I I U I L
r^ ~
SJ) I I U 1 Z '..]
s I I !Y I *-' J to
iW I I ~ I U ,. ¢
t- I I o f L ~n I- :d
I ¢ I I G f ~ - '-'
J I f- I J I ~~ O " Q U
~¢ I I O 1 H L U j
!--
I --+
~+ '
1- I I ¢
•
!-+ I C ~ W I 'J I ~ J W LL W
LL I m e ~ - I ..1¢ > > H
I ~ c !~ I ¢ 1 T r- O F J IL
I U .+ U~ W ~ I ~ i U7 C! ''' 1~1 W > J
I a U !7= Gr ? W 1 1 0 '^ U I.J w
I J tT I I F- !-; ~ ~ ~ ¢ F
• I W W U tJ I I Q C [n W~ >
!¢ -. s~ x 1 ! '~ Z m rr 2 J
.-n IL L7J 11 17i Q Q :~ lTl "' LL H In
, :~~ '~ ,J I L' I I t~ ~'~ ti N {I~ I tD
j ~ flj U~ .-1 f~7 ~ j I ' J I .. .. .y t0 tU 1 IU
I ~
O I
I
I I ~ I
I I
~ ~ I
1
~
I
I I I
I_ I
V
'.~.
..'
G I
'r
.J _ _ 'J V J I V
~ . r?1 13
7 W I pJ .+ 11 1 -+ + I
~. W I I I I
~ Z I 1 I I
L !
I I I
I I I
I 1 1
I I
~~ I
'J
1 I
I v 1 0
I __
I I
7 I
M
U7 ! j I fi I I
I
m I , ~ I
m
., I
1 ~ ~
I I
I
I
I
1
,~ 1 I
I _ I
I 1
J
G I
1_
I •"'
I
d I '"''
i•7 I _' I
i f•1 i ''
f•] i !•7
I
m 1 I
m I
.-1 I
I I I
1 I
I I
I I
I
I
_
-
I ^ I
I -. I
..
~,
..
,
.. i
I ,. , y 7 I~
In I ,,~ ! :-,~ i I t9
1
m !
`~` I
I
I I I
i i
I I
I I
I
I
1
I
I I '~ I
m I -+ I I 1
m I
I
I
1 I I
I 1
I I
I I
I I I
I
I
I
I
,-t I ,^,
I ~ I .. t
I (~l I ,^
r~~ 1 ~_.
I 1.~
m I ~~~ I r~ I f'~ I ''}
I
m
`' 1
I
I I
i i I
I
I
O I j i I
H r ,^, ,^:
~
~ I
j a i cn m I
U W I m m .T m I
ci ¢ Z I I
W I i
~-+ ? 1 I
It I I
I L~ L7 O !f! '~ I
a W I ~ s s s s I
*, a tL i .. } ~ t
U Cri
x r-I I
Y W J I u; ~ i
U7 fY I ,-+ I J ,'U
m o I
m 3 1 I .,;~ _ I
1 U
h 1
Z
C'
'.~
,~ ~^~ I
:, I- O I t~ ~ r
-+ J L7 O I -+ ~+ .•• 1
m i71 r-+ U 1 I
m a
O I
I I
I
I
i
I
1
I
1 i I W
1 I I it
~ J i w i u ~
(n 1 J I U I Z O
F 1 i I [i l r~ lQ
~
I
~ I 7
~ 1 U J
2
r-1 1 Q > Z J I I 2 S-
J I n a 'r. c 'r I J I a IZe a Q U
1 7 a U ~ '= ~ fI I Z I` ¢ Z ate.
.~ 1 [.~ 1 f, J W ~_
r I S: i` I O I
P
y N !11 li c
L
tr I Z I W O iq E
U
a ,-r ;, r I Z I ~~: h Q CC G x
I
n j ~ c, O ~ 1 ~~ I ^" 3 O > O W f9 J
L~
O ly I W W ~ 3~ O =2
1 0 3 ~
~ ~ s l;! 1
I 1 3
I tU LfI r'
Z W
iD W
U> ~ N
a O
I h
I Y ~ oG Y ..~ Z fD
12 I 1 fA ~ r-+ ~ '-+ O 1 h
I 11 U W :II W W O ~ I
I I
I Z ~?"
^ O
Z >
J J ~
tiZ a ~
I J O 3 ~ Z O ~ O
- ( 12 ~ 1 .T. J Z p
1 Q~
'r' t_. W
..._.rn J
ri W
m .-1 'n CO fJl Ti W a r Z
•
•
•
•
I
I 'J
Q I U7
!- i 4J
O f .+
1- I
W N I
¢ p I
~ W i
H W 1
7 Z i
t`
%r O
~~ m
(~ m
d
r~
I
U7 f 7
rrJ ~
- :,
: I
~
'J 'J I
I '~
N ~.., I cD
PJ I ,J)
W I 1
.r I nJ
1
1
'J I 'J
',:, -~ 1 O
'J I J I 'J
OnO I U7
°:1 U ':'J I t
W ~-O
ti I r-0
I
U7
m
m
.-i
I =' ..
I '_, W
• I '_• i~J
~ I '~' I
m I !?J a
m
., I CJ
1
i
1 'J J
!~ I U7 I '~ 'J' ' ' ~~
Cn ! ,-! n .., J r!J H
m
-+ I U
I ~-
I _
1 'r•1
I '~ 1
nJ I .^. (1)
m i r , ~,
m
~ I
I
I
1
-
I
I
I U
i !?J
--! I •`, I
N I (~ n
m 1 U
I
_ ':'J
I
Ul (J]
r!J 1-
.^ irJ .^. Iii ,~. irJ ~ .y i~ !_, irJ
~
~ ~ T s ~ cn I ~~ c~
!'~ ~
.. ~ ~ ~ „ ,.
N= - -r) .i
I I U7 I CU
f~'~u-+£UlCUh7 I
~- ~ N U
iJ (•1 J ~ t'J
•_, frJ '_, I
I „ ~7 b7 N
~• J ri r) " r~i ~- LrJ t-
rq ,~ t9 - id i~7
U7 I i- I~ i '_, 1v I
.:U n '7J CO •:' G1 O a U7 rA U7 O
U .?J ~ !?J ;- ( i irJ F- ~
I •;.,
I U7
I r:q
'J ^
(']
"' 1 I O
i! F
. J
i .t
~
.. I
I
I
I
I
I ':,
I t0
In
I .-r
I
~ O
I '~
I rU i
I
i
I U7
I 'U
I ~
I ~
I
I
J --. I Y
Q W I I 1' iY
f- U i i CC Q W
'-+ Z I ~ I Q Yf1U
n ¢ I (~ O I nrr Z£
Q N N Z I Z Z I Q W Q W
UW W W 1 ~+ ~ 10711>ZI-
U UI- 1 U It N I Z OWN
D7 O+-+ I N Q F' ~ I JHC7MN
O O Z 1 !- Z J N
F-Cq tJl£ I Z ~+ W W ¢ W I W Z}QJ
Lii W W~ 12 W W O O I N£ '-i Q
•
-J O I t' n' > ~ i- U I EUIY~
UZ ZN I IL D W 1OOC~I-
W W t:JY I ^' 2 ~} p O p 1 SUW2
¢? >+Y 1 0 f- n> Z J W I Q >n I
W W rS 1 O A I
~~
~n
IN H J 1 > Q I
Z I N
O
r
Y J i 0 ;J J J J W O I I U
£
~ J 1 ~+
n
I n
I
Q ¢ 1 I- H ~ IY ¢ N N
I Z Z n Z Z J p ~
1 0 O ~S W W ¢ Z
rr p di U {~ (D CO 7
~~
J I U7 'J I N
ry f- .i ~ I U7
~ OU
W CD 1 ~
¢ a I
~ W I I
~ Z I I
W I I
67 ~ ~
~ I I
V
~. 1 ~* i d'
L7~ i f') I f'?
~ i I
I '~'
I '''
I U7
r~ I ..
m I
>* I
I
'J
~J
u~
~IJ
m I
I
I
n
H I
I
I
I
i I
i
I
i
C>' I
I
I
I
i I
I
I
!
I
m
>, I
i
i
I
i
I I
1
Z !:J I
~-+ U N I I^ T 1-~
f~ r_ a i I~ o r-
Z t:J I ~'i ~± m
c; Z I
~+ uJ I
;L } !
W 1
J I tf) fll ~7
rr L - • W I ~ (r IY
U Q ~ i_ I >- ?- >
]~ H
L7 W W J I U7 ll~ ~7
LT E- I ~, .
7 I
ti %-+ I 'J 'J I
Q J 1 ~ ,"'. 1
Crr F-U I I
tr Q I I
+-+ d i
I
I I
i ~
I W tll
1 3 C-l
I J Z
y
[!I 1 '~ Z
I c~ o W
u7 I z r t-
t- I ~ :.~ z
H I a ¢ H
I ~ x F
J ! Y [C I-
q I W
t- 13 W W Y
4 I i] lT !Y !Z
G I J W W rS
~ I fTi W W -
U 1 a a
3 J
I O Z Z ~
I Z x 2 !-
I !A ~ O O
1
I ..
I '-~
-~ '~
., I-
I
I
i
I
i
1
1
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
'J I 'J
67 ~ I U7
-f 1}~ I _! I ItJ
f+l 1 f~1
I
I
I
I r
I
I
I
I
I
_
j 1
i '..
I
I
i
I
I
I
- I
I
,
,_
I~1 _
'.iJ { V
f•7 I f'?
U? I U7
.. I -,
I
I
I
I
!_
I `_
I
I
i;7
W
U
•
•
(A I A ~
W I Z ~
U i 7 O
c Its. fn
z
wiz
lr
J t U
S I >
~, I to S
J I D
Z
W _
! L~ l7 ~ F-1
Q i R !L J ~-
I r--y
1-r ~ ~- > J
IJ_ I Z Q
! J W W F
I rT G l] l..!
I I- a u t-
I - I~
I ~ 7
T
I ~{ I_j .
U w in
•
I _ 'J `J 'J I 'J
J I '~' U7 h7 I
Q I ~.; ;~ CU I r?J I 4J
r7 I Q ., I rtrn ,~ 1 ,-,
h 1
I
I I
!
I I
I
I
I
I
rJ 1
-_
I I
'-+
1
W L7 1 .;
~' I I
C q I p !_ I
7 W 1 i
t I
!- W I ~ 77
i I
~ Z ! 1 I
~ I
I
I
!
1 !
~
I I
J
I
U7 1 I
I I
I
m i i
~+ I
I I
1
1 I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I I
..'
I ~: ~
I
~ 1
G
I
I
!
m I
~ '
'~ 1
I
m 1
I
I i
!
1 I
I
j
j
i
I _
J 1
I
1 ,J
f•) I '~ 1 v I ,w,
to I ~~ I., Q 1 3
m I
j
i
I I
I
I
I
I
i _ I
I
I I I 'J
_
!
6~ i ; ~1 CU ~D 1 ~il
m
• r I
!
I I
I
_
'
_ I
~
I
-'
! ~.:~ e7 _
! U~ t _.
-1 1 - ''JJ ~.IJ 1 ''J I " J
m I ~-7 I S irJ I CU
Cn I
1 I
I i
I
O
j
I I
I 1
I
Z ~ I
L' L7 1
U Q q 1
Z W i
Q ~ J I
Z Q Z I
M W I
!~! } !
Q ~ I
J W I
U G L it i
Y H 1
u7 W J I
m c I
m;_ 1 I
- _
- _ I
" O 1 _ _
- - I _ _
- - - i r _ _ ~ I
CO ;- JI I , . ". ~~ L7 ~"• "~ 1 '~ •~
• L7 I C' ~ ':U I !!7 ~ ?J ~.~ I
Y O O 1 !T OJ W' C;J l''J t~ i _
~J tL I r:'J i L'1 OJ I rj
m 4 1 I I I; I I
~• a I I
! 1 +
I I
I
1 1
I
I
t
U I
I
I I '~ Y I C7
I 1 lL ~ I
U? I Y I ~ ¢
~, Z I J
Z i z 1
W I Q I W '- '~ I W
h I d I Z J ~ h
r, 1
1 0 U
Q
'" J I
r
.A
J { •r I h Z Q N -!~ t O F- O ~ 7 1 Q O
Q 1 N U
f u~ 5= ID r tt1 W _ ~ ;_v E f1; I cy S
{- I ~ I to :~ •, N .-r .,
_ ill rA w J Q 1 Q. rI
• I O I *-+ J ^~ ^ 'L i? ? Z J O O O 0 1 2 R 2 q
a I ~ I~ ;-? t ti W• ~' [a 'J J '.~ i I w ice! ~-+
U I O I G u '6 i u1 ++ ~ x x G? ~ J q l rT Z Q J
I U I --r ~ D N z\ IJI 'J ~n H !a1 2 r+ l N G ~~
I I q Y ~'+ 3~ i ru ~ Z ~ - I q Y } !-
I I Z Y '% N !G ~~ N -~ l1 •"' J 7_ U '7 1 Z ~T Q O
I I QQ.II N--r U ~a ~:r i~ W ~ 1 O Q J '-
I 1 J 1 = i s 1 f1
' 1 f Cfl L^ ,
I I ...-. .. .. .. ,. .. 4 rn i:: ,. .. I .. ,. .~
1 1 W W ~ I
J
H
O
F-
~ U7 I
~ ^ I
Ut. Z ~
I
I
I
I
1
U7 I
m t
~n 1
H I
1
I
I
m j
Ln I
~ 1
1
I
th
m
m
m I
m I
r+ I
I
I
I
m
m
U to
¢ ~
5 W
¢ Z
W
}
X H
WJ
. W I
e ~ I
'J 'J
'J V
'J I `J
I V 'J
J 'J
'~ J I ;J
J I V V 'J 'J '.' '~ 'J U 'J
'J O J '.J J V J I 'J
I J
I J
U7 U7 I `~ v 'J 'J I ''•' J J U7 U7 O ':~ ' ' ' I G I 4J
1 f~1 I ,~ m N *+ I V7 ~' U7 r ,+ rA W '?J ~
. I~?J 1 M
I •, .• I pJ , ~?J ., r•~ I o I a
• I
I 1
I I
-~
I
I
I N
I
I
1
1 I
I _ I 1
I 'J I `'' O'• r^JO'JOO 1 0 1 0
I V7 I U7 ~' ^ U7 U7 ~J ':~ • ' r I '~ I U7
I rU I ~?J v U7 r -+ QJ ~ tU ^ 1 n1 1 ~
j
I
I
I ., nJ r. M I rJ
I ~+
I 1 ~
I -+
1 _
.J
1 _
I I
I
I '~ I I 1 ':r
I ~.
~ I '~' I 1 0
I .
U7 I '~~ I I U7
I
I
I riJ I iU
I
1 I
I
1 I 4J
I
I
J I
I
I J
.j
r^J I
I
1 .J I
1
J I
I
J
O I ':J I I I
,;~ I O I'^' I 1 0
U7 I U7 •~ U7 I U? I I ~J
t~ I !q
I Q' iU i tD
I
I I
I
I I ~
I "
I
u I
I
I I
I
I I
I
I ~ I
1
I .7
I `:J I '• I I G
I I U7
r 1 r
I
I bJ *+ I t)
I
I I
I
! I r
I T.
I
I
I
I
O
'=+ I
I
I
i
I
I
1 0
I 'J ':
+ I I I v
I
I
I fM .
~?J I l7
I
I I
I
~ I M
I ~
~ •
j
I
I_ i
I _
I I
i _
I v I
I
I ~+
I = p i ~• I I U7
U7 ~ UJ ~ ~~ nJ
i
I
I
I ~~ 1 •t
I
I
I I
I
! I
I ~
I
I 'J ~l I 'J I - - 'J 'J 'J
~ I 'J I 'J
I r1 ,^r ~J I ';J 'J I -r ~] r,j ij ^~ l1
1r '. I '.J I 'J
J 1 O U7 U7 I '.~ I '~ ' ' U7 U7 ' • ' ' ;J '~ I ':~ I U7
`~ I nJ
O O I I I I
;- U I 1 1
I
I i
I
j
m
i " J Z
I
{
I ~ •. J O
I
I
I ¢
I p ¢ ¢OO~+
I I W W I W I R CZOf-
I I ¢ i] I ;: 1 ~ 7 ¢ Cl U fA W
W ~ I
O
S Y~ i W W¢ U O
' F
Z I O I H E I fA O J
I fr '+ NZZ~+JINC ¢ L7
W 1 ¢ I Z } W i S N > r- t Q N= ~+ '-+ ~^ F•- U ~ Y
J I F j a p ~ r:7 1 C -+ A I W U W Z J A W Y '1
¢ I ~°+ I C 5 W I A I- N ¢ W I q'L >+-~W W>Z¢ I J
H 1 U! I W CI ~ J I l:J ~ iJ G E I S OI z 3 4 ¢ f1
" Z ¢
*+ I ¢ I ;- ¢ O ~-+ +-+ I d ;0 A !- F 0 D J~ 3 Z
I Q O I-
~ I W I J W A Z 2 1 ~ ]: O 2 1 r' i rJOWZOW Z O
fI I ~ I W W O ¢ I W J Z J C 1 u -~ '•+ 11 J W! J f~ F-
U I 1 2 T > I- I J ¢ S O I -~ '-+ q U W J O J
'
~ :- O 1 A Z -+ T¢¢ F ¢
1 X 1 1 >- i =I I U w O IY I '+ ,. H U [7 tl O I--
I I CC ~I J F- I U n ~ `' a lL
I
J t~~ O
I I¢ J !7 O 1 '~ ¢
OG .. ..
a ~ _ ~ ~ w c~ I- z I ,. o-i ~
`
I I 1 ,. -, .. Z ~?i r
i
1 -~
I .. ,.
1 ~
ni fi .. nj f•7
•
• Ct)
J
Q
0
2 p
~ W
F- W
~ Z
LL
U7
m
m
.,
~ I
m 1
.ti 1
1
t~ 1
m I
m I
i
r1
L J
•
i
17J
m
m
~ I
m I
lT I
-+ I
I
I
C'J I
Z CS I
H ~~ N I
U Q A I
Z W 1
¢ ¢ W I
Z ¢ Z I
• `+ W I
IL } I
Z i
a¢ I
y J w I
Ua a U_ I
X 1-1 I
U7 W J I
ma 1
mE
~a J I
U ff I
I Z F- i
~) ~+ N i
..Y t' O 1
mz +/U 1
m¢ z I
-+ a o 1
'.! `J rJ '~ I J rJ 'J I V ~ rJ I rJ I rJ
`J J O I `J ' J I J ~J J I r" I J
U7 G O I U7 v '~ I '~ O '3 1 0 I U7
N 'J 'U7 I 'J O1 O I IiJ J O I G I t~l
t0 r Yp I t'J t` U7 1 nJ O •• 1 .+ I 47
~ I m
I I -~
1 -• I ..
I I ,~
I -+
~.:+ I I
O 1
O 1
'v
G 1 ':~ I I 1 ';~
I rJ I I I ';~
',;, 1 0 I I I '~
G I ';~ I I 1 O
m I A
I
1 1
1
I I
I
1 I ra
I
I
I
v
I
I
I
I I
~
I
t
1
t I
O
I
1
I
1 I
v
I
I
I
I
':/
`~ I
V I
'7
r
J I
r
J I
r
J
'~ rJ 1 0 1 O 1 '._, 1 6
~ I
J 1 U 1 7 1
Q •.^
i U7
PJ ' U ~ d
I
I ~
I
I t`1 i t~1
I
I i t
I
1
1
I I
I I
I I
1
I '^ O 1 ',_, rJ G I I '~
I
I
I i
I
I I
I
I i .~
I
t
1
I I
i I
I _ I
1
•;~ I ,~ '~ I '~ I I ';,~
fIJ I i1J
I
I
I t'] t0 1 1•Q
1
I
1 I
I
I
I 1 CD
I
I
I
_
V I
I _
I ~''
~~ I
I
1 O
A I
I
I '~ 1
1
I '.~
U7 I U7 + I~, v I v I U7
.~ f~ I S
I
1
i
I 'U I CU
I
I
I
1 1
I
I
I
I I I,p
I
I
1
l i I
~
1 I
I
I
w '
1 1 ~ i n r
z i A o
I I q c
a
1 Z .~ !JJ I Z !r
Ul i Y i 7 C7 7 J > I 7 CD
U I tY I LL Z 1 1 J O I LL rn
rz I Q I } ~-1 1 W z l ~ Y
O I a l h rn !- J I I- G7 Z rD 1 f- N F- ¢
N I} I W Z Z W I W Z } I W Z U7 a
I {- 1 E ff O Z I E ¢ O : ~
w
I H I
w
z
F
rn l
w
x
S . I W W J
~ I Z I > r~ F 1 > ' ¢ rn 1 > ' > Q
O O 1 0 q ¢ 1 0 s~ F
W I E I ~ A ~ U T I C ~ W I C 2 Z O
> I L I a W O ff l a O ? I ~. O O i-
l:J I O I E H J A I F J 1-+ I E
~ I U I 1-+ ff CO ff '-+ I H rq ff Z I `-•+ N J
I I Z Z i- I Z !- O I Z Q
I I N J [~ O O I J O ~ I Q ~ O
1 I Z Q .-. ,-/ F- I ff
I 1 •~ E- Ul I'•' 1 F F- 1 t- t- H
I I Z a~ A Z I a> Z I n> z
I I O QW Z O I ffIJ O I ffW0
rTi UJ ~ q UJ A UJA
Meeting Date: 10-22-90
Agenda Item: E-4
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Action on City of Falcon Heights Parking Policy
SUBMITTED BY: Parking Committee
Susan Hoyt, City Planner
REVIEWED BY: Jan Wiessner, City Administrator
Susan Hoyt, City Planner
Shirley Chenoweth, City Clerk
Ron Savard, Police Department
Tom Gedde, City Attorney
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
Attorney Tom Gedde reviewed the city~s proposed parking policy
with special attention to the residential permit parking section.
Mr. Gedde explains that the city may move ahead with the
residential permit parking policy and action, if a public purpose
is clearly identified (see attachment 1). Section B. 1. a and b
of the proposed parking policy clarifies when residential permit
parking will be necessary.
ATTACHMENT 1 - Letter from City Attorney dated 9/17/90
ATTACHMENT 2 - Draft Parking Policy dated 9/12/90
ACTION REQUESTED:
Recommend to City Council
A-rt~r~.~~r- ~.
JENSEN, HICKEN, GEDDE ~ SCOTT, P. A.
n
J
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
300 ANOKA OFFICE CENTER
2150 THIRD AVENUE
ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303-2296
OF COUNSEL
HADLEY, CHARLES S.
LUTHER, RICHARD L.
HOWSE, G. CRAIG
BOCK, EDWARD A., JR.
GEDDE, THOMAS A.
HICKEN, JEFFREY P.
HOWARD, ROBERT A.
JENSEN, DAVID L.
NATTKE, PAUL E.
SCOTS, MICHAEL J.
TELEPHONE (612) 421-4110
TELECOPIER (612) 421-1040
September 17, 1990
,Ms. Susan Hoyt
r^alcon Heights City-Planner
City of Falcon Heights
2077 West Larpenteur Avenue
Falcon Heights, MN 55113-5594
RE: Draft Parking Policy for the City of Falcon Heights
Dear Ms. Hoyt:
This letter is in response to your memo of September 11, 1990
. asking for my comments on the draft parking policy for the
City of Falcon Heights. In particular, you ask whether desig-
nation of residential permit parking areas is permissible.
The League of Minnesota Cities addressed this issue in a re-
search memorandum dated January, 1986. It observed that prob-
lems of congestion sometimes arise in residential areas which
are near institutions or commercial areas which attract a
large number of transient parkers. Area residents may then
encounter difficulty in finding on-street parking spots near
their homes. Some cities have attempted to alleviate this
problem through the use of a permit system for residential
parking whereby permits are issued to residents to allow park-
ing on designated streets and any vehicles parked on those
streets which do not display a permit are subject to tagging
or impoundment.
There does not appear to be any state law prohibiting this
type of parking regulation. However ordinances of this type
have been challenged as violating equal protection clauses. of
the state and federal constitutions. Some courts have over-
turned such ordinances on these grounds. However other courts
have upheld such ordinances and the U.S. Supreme Court in the
1977 case of County Board of Arlington County Virginia v
Richards, upheld a residents-only parking ordinance. In up-
holding the ordinance the court observed that a distinction
• between residents and non-residents may be valid where there
Ms. Susan Hoyt
Page 2
September 17, 1990
is a rational basis for the distinction. Therefore it would
appear to be possible for a Minnesota city to limit on-street
parking on certain streets to area residents.
The division of authority on the issue is sufficient such that
the outcome of a legal challenge to any such ordinance cannot
be predicted with certainty. I do believe the City can pro-
ceed with such regulations in good faith, and if it chooses to
do so, can reduce the likelihood of the regulations being
~ challenged, or being found unconstitutional, by careful draft-
ing which addresses the overall public purpose and rat_ Tonal
basis for the legislation.
Yours truly,
HIC~~j GEDDE & SCOTT, P.A.
'mamas A. Gedde
Falcon Heights City Attorney
TAG/abg
•
x~
•
I. PARKING POLICIES
A. GENERAL
The City's parking philosophy is to provide a safe, orderly, and,
when possible, convenient parking environment for residents, trade
and visitors within the city, while keeping the streets primarily
for safe and efficient traffic flow.
B. SPECIFIC
1. Maintain the streets primarily for safe and efficient traffic
flow.
2. Maintain the residential character of the City°s neighborhoods
and the 'small-scale' or 'village' character of the overall
City by attempting to alleviate parking conflicts between
residential neighborhoods and non-residential uses when they
appear; and by utilizing complementary new parking facilities
when they are necessary.
3. Encourage property owners to accommodate parking demands
generated by the property particularly redevelopment and
• new development, by enforcing the parking requirements in
the zoning code and working with property owners, residents
and/or proprietors when parking problems develop.
4. Cover the cost of parking administration and enforcement
by charging fees to the individuals for these services, whenever
possible.
5. Adopt temporary parking restrictions when necessary to accommodate
the Minnesota State Fair and other special circumstances.
6. Consider a variety of on street and off street parking solutions
to parking problems including posting restrictions, permit
parking, shared parking, parking lots, parking ramps, and
re-routing traffic. The simplest solution shall be selected.
7. Select the most efficient and least disruptive solution to
a par'.~cing problem.
II. PROC~iIRES FOR HADIDLING PARKING P1~BLEMS
A. ORIGINATION
Parking problems arise when parking demands conflict with fixed
amounts of available on and off street parking to produce an
• unsafe and/or inconvenient parking situation.
~- /Z-fin
•
- 2 -
B. IDENTIr^ICATION
Parking problems come to the attention of the City when:
1. A city official reports a safety problem and/or inconvenience
problem.
2. A resident(s), proprietor(s) and/or a property owner(s) reports
a safety and/or an inconveniece problem.
C. EVALUATION
1. Problem: A possible immediate threat to public safety:
a. The appropriate city staff shall i~, lately research
the reported parking situation. The city staff must
visit the site and assess the parking conditions at various
times of the day as well as collect other useful information
including state and county rules governing the street(s)
• in question. The city planner shall prepare a written
report on the nature and severity of the reported parlcing
problem and alternative solutions for the city administrator
as soon as possible but no more than five working days
after the reported problem.
b. If the parking situation is determined to be a threat
to public safety, the city administrator rust take the
necessary action to alleviate the dangerous situation.
A report of the steps taken shall be made to the Planning
Commission and the City Council at their earliest meeting
dates. Any revisions in the action taken nay be made
at this time.
2. Problem: A possible, but not immediate, threat to public
safety and/or inconvenience to residents, businesses, and/or
institutions:
a. If notice of the parking problem arose from a city official,
city staff shall research the reported parking problem.
Staff shall visit the site, assess the parking conditions
at various times of the day and collect other useful
information including state and county rules governing
the streets in question. The staff shall also determine
whether the problem area is limited to the area specified
• in the complaint or broader in scope.
Gf' /L -cjC;
•
- 3 -
b. If notice of the parking problem arose from a resident(s),
proprietor(s) and/or property owner(s) complaint, the
city staff shall request a formal written request be
submitted to the City defining the nature of the problem,
the affected area and, whenever possible, the names of
other affected property owners in agreement with the
problem. The city staff shall research the reported
parking problem. Staff shall visit the site, assess
the parking conditions at various times of the day and
collect other useful information including state and
county rules governing the streets in question. If appropriate,
residents and/or property owners in the affected area
shall be contacted for their opinion about the existence
and/or extent of the parking problem. The staff shall
also determine whether the problem area is limited to
the area specified in the complaint or is broader in
scope.
c. If staff research suggests that the City needs
to take action to alleviate the parking situation,
the city planner shall make a report with the proposed
alternatives to the Planning Corunission for its review •
and recommendation. The Planning Commission recommendation
and staff report will go to the City Council for final
action.
d. If staff research suggests that the City does
not need to take action to alleviate the parking situation,
the city planner shall report the state of the request
at the next Planning Commission and City Council meetings.
III. PARKING RF~TCTIONS
A. POSTED PARKING RESTRICTIONS
1. Posting parking restrictions on streets may be used to control
on-street parking problems in specific areas for various
lengths of time. When such a solution is proposed, the
affect on nearby streets must be taken into account.
2. Restrictions shall contain as few conditions as possible
so they are easily understood and enforced.
3. Restrictions adopted to alleviate a specific parking problem
shall be as consistent as possible in a neighborhood and
throughout the City. For example, "two hour parking 8:00 •
A.M_ to 4:00 P.M. P9onday through Friday" should be used
throughout the City rather than some "one hour parking 8:00
A.M. to 4:00 P.M. Monday through Friday".
9~- i2 -90
4. On-street posted signs shall include:
a) "No Parking Anytime"
No parking anytime" is to be used when parking at anytime
of day or night is a safety threat to the public or
a chronic inconvenience to residients and/or property
owners.
b) Parking for a specified period of time
Signs restricting parking for a specified period of
time shall be used to control traffic turnover for commercial
areas and 'prevent the inconvenience to residents of
long-term parking in residential neighborhoods near ,
businesses and institutions_ These shall include "15
Minute Parking", "Two Hour Parking from 8:00 A.f1. to
4:00 P.M. Monday through Friday".
c) "No Parking" for a specified distance
Signs restricting parking for a specified distance are
useful to eliminate safety hazards near alleys, driveways
and stop signs. Examples include: "No parking between
signs", "No parking here to corner".
B. RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMITS
1. Purpose/Policy
rkin shall be ursued as a solution
a. Residential permit pa g p
to a parking problem only when all other solutions
have been determined inadequate.
b. Residential districts congested because of heavy residential
and non-residential traffic and parking are eligible
to request residential permit parking. It is the purpose
of this policy to reduce the flow of commuter traffic
from year-round non-residential traffic for parking
into an adjoining residential neighborhood; to reduce
air pollution and other environmental effects of automobile
commuting; to enhance the quality of life in the residential
areas by reducing noise, traffic hazards and litter;
to protect the residents from unreasonable burdens
in gaining access to their residences; to preserve
the character of the residential district; to promote
• efficiency in maintaining the streets in a clean and
safe condition; to preserve the safety of children
and other pedestrians; and to promote traffic safety;
and to promote the peace, good order, comfort, convenience
and welfare of the inhabitants of the City.
~-!Z - cjo
•
- 5 -
c. Pdo residential parking permits shall guarantee any
permit holder of a designated parking space, but shall
provide general par}:ing subject to availability in
designated areas during the posted, specified times.
2. Procedures for Designating Residential Permit Parking Areas
a. Submitting a request
1) Petition
The designation of a residential permit parking
area shall be initiated by a petition filed with•
the city staff stating that residents of a particular
residential area are encountering serious problems
because of excessive par}sing by persons who are
associated with nearby nonresidential uses. A
filing fee shall accompany every petition. The
fee is identified in chapter five of the city code.
2) Signatures
The petition must be signed by owners of 75% of
the residential structures in the area. Only one
owner per structure may sign. No signature shall
be valid where multiple owners in a household express
disagreement on whether the area should have residential
permit parking.
Any signer may withdraw his/her name by filing
a written request. If for any reason the number
of signers falls below 75% prior to the public
hearing, the petition shall be deemed defective
and shall not be considered. The person and/or
group responsible for submitting the petition will
be notified of this finding prior to the public
hearing.
3) Minimum Size
The request for residential permit parking must
be a minimum of 600 linear feet.
b. Request Review Process
1) Staff Review
After receiving the petition, the city staff shall •
assess. the nature of the problems, if any, caused
by nonresidential parking in a residential area.
The city planner shall submit a report to the Planning
Commission The r~ rt must include the following
~po
information : y ~~ L ~~~
•
- 6 -
a. The need assessment for residential permit
parking
b. The specific area petitioned for residential
permit parking
c. The guidelines for who and how one nay obtain
a residential parking permit
d. The potential implications of such a parking
arrangement in the area
e. If the permit parking area is recommended,
the report must also include:
(1) A recommended review period to evaluate
the resie~ential permit parking district
•
(2) The specific area recommended for residential
permit par,cing
2) Policy Review
The city planner shall submit the report with
its recommendation to the Planning Commission.
A public hearing shall be held on the request.
The Planning commission shall submit a recommendation
to the City Council. The City Council shall make
the final decision. If the City Council designates
a residential permit parking district, the resolution
shall state the need for the district, the location,
hours (if applicable), streets to be posted permit
parking and the procedure for issuing permits
to eligible residents.
3. Permit Eligibility and Fees
a. Resident Permits
Residents living on streets designated in the residential
permit parking district may annually apply for a
non-transferable residential parking permit for each
car owned or leased, currently licensed and in operating
condition at the address. Anon-refundable annual
residential permit fee will be charged. The fee
shall be identified in chapter five of the city code.
A false application shall be grounds for denial of
the residential permit.
-<Z~ f~;
- 7 -
b. Lost Permits
A duplicate permit may be obtained for a fee, if
the application submits a notarized, written statement
to the City that the original permit was lost. The
fee shall be identified in chapter five of the city
code.
c. Placement of Permit
Annual residential parking permit stickers shall
be permanently affixed to the inside. of the vehicle
in the lower rear corner of the left side window
closest to the rear of the vehicle.
C. EXCEPTIONS
1. Emergency Vehicles
Emergency vehicles are exempt from posted parking restrictions
when responding to an emergency.
2. Snow Emergencies
After a two inch snowfall, no on street parking is allo~.~ed
until the street is plowed to its full width.
3. State Fair Parking
a. Temporary "no parking" signs shall be posed on streets
designated by the City Council during the Minnesota
State Fair.
b. Temporary parking permits shall be issued to residents
and/or property owners of designated apartment buildings
along streets designated "no parking" by the City Council
during the Minnesota State Fair.
4. Temporary Parking Permits
a. Temporary "no parking" signs shall. be issued for the
following reasons:
1. For construction and service vehicles necessary
for performing work on a property
2. For special event parking or visitor parking in
a residiential permit parking district
3. For visitor parking in a residential. permit parking
district •
~-l2-`lam
t
II
u
b. A temporary parking permit shall be issued for a minimum
of one day and a maximum of two weeks. The applicant
shall identify the purpose for the permit and the length
of time required for the temporary parking permit.
• c. A temporary parking permit shall be placed over the
post holding the rear view mirror or in some other
conspicuous spot inside the front windshield of the
vehicle where it is visible to law enforcement personnel.
d. A temporary parking arrangement using a bag over a
sign to cover up the parking restrictions shall be
issued for one to three days. The applicant shall
• identify the purpose for the bag(s) and the length
of time required for this temporary parking arrangement.
The bag(s) shall be returned by the person using it.
e_ Temporary parking permit fees are designated in chapter
five of the city code.
D. ENFORCEMENT
Penalties for violating the City's parking restrictions are defined
in:
~! 2 -/~
r~
L_J
APPENDIX ONE:
Parking Fees to Add to Chapter Five of the City Code
1. Temporary Permits $10.00/event
2. Filing Fee for Petition for Residential Permit Parking $25.00
• 3. Annual Residential Parking Permits $25.00
4. Lost Residential Parking Permits $10.00
•
~_~Z-y~
Meeting Date
Agenda Item
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
10-22-90
E-6
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Proposed addition to the zoning code governing
garage and boutique sales in a residential zone.
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Susan Hoyt, City Planner
Susan Hoyt, City Planner
Shirley Chenoweth, City Clerk
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
The zoning code does not address the number or type of garage
sales in residential neighborhoods. In order to control
"chronic" garage sales with merchandise brought onto the property
from non-residential places, the attached additions to the code
are intended to regulate flagrant abusers of garage sales. They
are not intended as a mechanism to discourage annual residential
garage and boutique sales held by homeowners or their neighbors.
ATTACHMENT 1 - Proposed zoning code additions governing garage
and boutique sales in an R-1 zone.
ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Review, discuss, change as desired
2. Schedule public hearing, if desired
• 4
• MEMORANDUM:
TO: Planning Commission
Meeting Date
Agenda Item
Attachment
10-22-90
E-6
1
FROM: Susan Hoyt, City Planner
RE: Proposed Zoning Code Additions Governing Garage and
Boutique Sales in an R-1 Zone
The zoning code does not address the number or type of garage
sales allowed in residential zones. In order to be able to
control "chronic" garage sales with merchandise brought onto the
property from outside the home and neighborhood, the following
additions to the code are intended to regulate flagrant abusers
of garage sales. They are not intended as a mechanism to
discourage annual residential garage and boutique sales held by
homeowners and their neighbors or to eliminate moving sales or
estate sales.
9-4.01 Subdivision 3 Permitted Accessory Uses
(1) Garage and residential boutique sales limited to one sale
each calendar year per residential unit, not to exceed ten
consecutive days or two consecutive weekends (proposed
10/22/90).
• 9-1.02 Rules and Definitions
132 (proposed) Sale - Garage
A garage sale is a sale of used household and personal items
conducted on residential premises, where the property sold
consists of items owned by the occupant or the premises at
which the sale takes place, or by friends of such occupant,
and where the sale is conducted by such occupant or friends.
Items for sale shall not have been purchased for resale or
received on consignment for the purpose of resale. (proposed
10/22/90)
133 (proposed) Sale - Residential Boutique
A residential boutique sale is the sale of handcrafted items
conducted on residential premises, where the items sold are
made by the occupant of the premises at which the sale takes
place, or by friends of such occupant, and where the sale is
conducted by said occupant or friends of such occupant.
Items for sale shall be made in the home and not purchased
for resale from any retail or wholesale business source nor
received on consignment for the purpose of resale.
(proposed 10/22/90)
. Please comment on the restrictiveness of the proposed
legislation.
Meeting Date 10-22-90
Agenda Item E-7
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Information on an upcoming discussion with the
City Council on retroactively enforcing rear and side yard
screening between businesses and residential properties, section
9-14.01 Subd. 5(b)(d)(e) of the zoning code.
SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Planner
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION•
The City Council will be discussing the policy of retroactive
screening of businesses included in section 9-14.01, subd.
5(b)(d)(e) of the zoning code. The screening of existing
businesses from adjacent residential zones is desirable. This is
routinely included in site plans for new development prior to
approval. However, retroactive enforcement requires greater
sensitivity to consistency in the business community, existing
site limitations, and additional expense to property owners. The
City Council will provide direction on this issue.
ATTACHMENT 1 - Section 9-14.01, Subdivision 5
ACTION REQUESTED
For your information
r
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 9-14.01
. c. Chemical insecticides or herbicides shall be stored, handled and
utilized as per the standards set forth by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency.
Subdivision 5. Screening. (All existing uses shall comply with this
standard by January 1, 1989).
a. Screening shall be required in residential zones where:
1. Any off-street parking area contains more than four (4)
parking spaces and is within thirty (30) feet of residential
zone; and .
2. Where the driveway to a parking area of more than six (6)
parking spaces is within five (5) feet of an adjoining
residential use or zone.
Where any business or industrial use (structure, parking or
s orage) is adjacent to property zoned for residential use, that
business or industry shall provide screening along the boundary of
the residential property. Screening shall also be provided where a
business, parking lot, or industry is across the street from a
residential zone, but not on the side of a business or industry
considered to be the front.
• c. All exterior storage sr all be screened. The exceptions are:
1. Merchandise being displayed for sale;
2. Materials and equipment currently used for construction on
the premises; and
3. Merchandise located on service station pump islands.
® The screening required in this section shall consist o~ earth
mounds, berms, or ground forms; fences and walls; landscaping (plant
materials) or landscaped futures (such as timbers) used in combina-
tion or singularly so as to block direct visual access to as object.
Required screening shall be as approved by the City Council.
sting land uses may be required to install screening if so
ordered by the City Council following public hearing.
86
Meeting Date 10-22-90
Agenda Item E-8
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Planning Workshops
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Susan Hoyt, City Planner
EXPLANATION/DESCRIPTION:
Two planning workshops are available to learn more about the
decision-making and laws governing planning commissions.
If you would like to attend one, please let Susan or Dee know.
The city will pay for your registration.
ACTION REQUESTED:
For your information
ANNUAL PLANNING INSTITUTE: THE BASICS
For those new to land use planning and zoning
or interested in a review of fundamentals
9:00 a.m. INTRODUCTION TO DAY
9:15 INTRODUCTION TO PLANNING
• Why plan?
- Enabling legislation
-Philosophical reasons
- Practical reasons
• Players in the planning process (includes
video)
• Understanding the planning process
• Elements of a comprehensive plan
10:00 BASIC PLANNING TOOLS-PART I:
ZONING, VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMITS
Definitions, Rationale, Uses, Myths/ Mis-
conceptions, How to's, Non-conforming Uses.
10:55 REFRESHMENT BREAK
11:10 ZONING CASE STUDIES:
HYPOTHETICAL PROBLEM SOLVING
Participants are placed into small groups in
which they work on rural or urban zoning
issues based on actual situations and timely
concerns.
1:00 p.m. YOUR LEGAL LIMITS: YOUR ROLE AS
A DECISION MAKER
• The changing environment in land use
• Legal limits
• Procedures to keep from being sued
• When something goes wrong, who's liable?
• Conflict of interest
• How your attorney can help
• Video presentation: "Rudehaven"
2:00 HOT ISSUES-PART I: ANSWERS
TO YOUR QUESTIONS (Faculty Panel)
2:20 BASIC PLANNING TOOLS-PART II:
SUBDIVISION REGULATION
Definition, ~ Rationale, Uses, Content,
Procedures, Design Standards, Financial
Guaranties, Special Provisions.
2:55 REFRESHMENT BREAK
3:10 EVALUATION OF A SUBDIVISION
PROPOSAL: A SIMULATION
Participants work in small groups to evaluate
a developer's subdivision plan using standard
planning tools-the comprehensive plan,
ordinances, aerial and soil maps.
4:10 HOT ISSUES-PART II: ANSWERS
TO YOUR QUESTIONS (Faculty Panel)
12:15 p.m. LUNCH
4:30 ADJOURN
CORE FACULTY
IAN TRAQUAIR BALL, Planner and Attorney,
Rasmussen & Ball
WILLIAM GRIFFITH, Attorney, Larkin, Hoffman,
Daly & Lindgren
ROBERT LOCKYEAR, Director of Planning and Public
Affairs, Washington County
GEORGE MARKS, Council Member,
City of St. Anthony
KAREN SCHAFFER, Assistant Attorney,
Dakota County
FEE
The $60 per person registration fee includes lunch,
refreshment breaks and handout materials.
This course has been approved for six hours of Continuing
Real Estate Education Credit.
.An excellent book, The Job of the Planning Commissioner,
by Albert Solnit, is available at the discount price of $11.00
for attendees of this program. If interested, please check
. appropriate place on registration form.
Note: This curriculum has been revised and updated from
previous years.
DATES/LOCATIONS
Wednesday, November 14, 1990
Regency Inn & Conference Center
1402 East Howard Street
Hibbing, MN 55746
(218)262-3481
Saturday, January 26, 1991
Holiday Inn North
2200 Freeway Blvd.
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
(612)566-8000
Tuesday, March 19, 1991
Earle Brown Center
U of M St. Paul Campus
1890 Buford Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55108
(Enter through Fairgrounds)
(612) 624-3275
Thursday, Apri14, 1991
Holiday Inn & Conference Center
1701 4th Street N.W.
Austin, MN 55912
(507) 433-1000
Page 2
BEYOND THE BASICS
Here's an excellent opportunity to enhance your
skills in two areas: planning for development (of
any size) in residential and commercial sites,
plus conducting public hearings or meetings.
This workshop is the next step for anyone
familiar with the basics of zoning and
subdivision regulation. Previous attendance at
the Annual Planning Institute or at least one
year on a planning commission or governing
body is suggested.
8:00 a.m. REGISTRATION
8:30 PLANNING FOR DEVELOPMENT
(Of Any Size!)
• Some definitions and background
• How tools relate to each other
• Subdivision exactions and dedications
• Role of comprehensive plan; standards
• Public and private sector perspectives
12:00 raon LUNCH
12:45 DUE PROCESS AND OTHER LEGAL
CONSIDERATIONS IN CONDUCTING
PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS
• Legal notice
• Open Meeting Law
• Conflict of interest
. Making findings of fact
Complete with video vignettes
"WHAT'S HOT, WHAT'S NOT"
• Summary of recent land use cases
• Proposed land use legislation
2:15 BREAK
2:30 SURVIVAL SKILLS: COPING WITH
THE REALITIES OF THE PLANNING
PROCESS
PRACTICAL GUIDELINES
FOR SUCCESS
9:45 BREAK
10:05 • Presentation of hypothetical cases
• Focused small group discussions on specific
issues involved in considering residential and
commercial development
CORE FACULTY
PETER RACHMAN, Attorney, Leonard, Street
and Deinard
JOHN SHARDLOW, Vice President, Dahlgren,
Shardlow and Uban, Inc.; planning consultant
specializing in planning development for all
types of communities
ELECTED OFFICIAL from a local community near
each workshop site
FEE
The $75 per person registration fee includes lunch,
refreshment breaks and handout materials.
This course has been approved for 6.5 hours of Continuing
Real Estate Education Credit.
The Job of the Planning Commissioner is available for
purchase by attendees of this program. (See description
on page 2.)
3:30 QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION OF
SPECIFIC SITUATIONS (Faculty Panel)
4:30 ADJOURN
DATES/LOCATIONS
Thursday, January 10, 1991
Sunwood Inn & Convention Center
One Sunwood Plaza
St. Cloud, MN 56302
(612) 253-0606
Wednesday, March 20, 1991
Earle Brown Center
U of M St. Paul Campus
1890 Buford Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55108
(Enter through Fairgrounds)
(612) 6243275
Thursday, May 2, 1991
Midway Motor Lodge
1517 16th Street S.W.
Rochester, MN 55902
(507) 289-8866
•
7
Page 3