Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPCMin_89Jun5MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 5, 1989 • Vice-Chair Finegan called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. Barry, Boche, Carroll, Daykin, Duncan, Finegan, and Grittner. PRESENT Also present was Council Liaison Wallin, Administrator Wiessner and Planner Malloy. Nestingan and Carroll. `a'BS~ Barry moved, seconded by Boche, to approve the May 1, 1989 5/1/89 Planning Commission Minutes as pre sented. Motion carried MINUTES APPROVED unanimously. Vice-Chair Finegan announced that the Publi c Hearing on OFF-SALE the request for a Conditional Use Permit to establish an LIQUOR STORE "Off-Sale" retail liquor store in Bullseye Center was withdrawn. COND. USE No hearing will be needed. WITHDRAWN Thomas G. Johnson, 1836 Moore, requested a Permitted Accessory. THOMAS G. Use, to construct a Gazebo on his property. He advised JOHNSON, neighbors have voiced no objections. Mr. Johnson then reviewed 1836 MOORE construction plans. After a short discussion on height, PERMITTED location and construction materials, the Permitted Accessory ACCESSORY USE Use was approved unanimously. APPROVED • Wayne L. Gladfelter, 1754 Arona, requested a Permitted Accessory Use, to construct a Gazebo on his property. He reviewed the construction and placement. Duncan moved, seconded by Barry, to approve the Permitted Accessory Use, which was unanimously approved. As requested by Council, the Planning Commission reconsidered setback requirements for corner lots. Wallin reviewed the reasoning behind Councilmembers concerns that they should be addressed differently than proposed. Chairman Black arrived at 8:00 P.M. Discussion ensued regarding the proposed language on the use of conditional use process so that it would not become a burden to the property owners, potential safety hazards, adoption of a dual rate structure for commercial vs. residential conditional use requests and how should the section be worded to accomplish the best results. Grittner was of the opinion that applying a conditional use in these instances was not appropriate. Daykin and Duncan agreed, the guidelines need to be more fully spelled out, they are too nebulous. WAYNE L. GLADFELTER, 1754 ARONA, PERMITTED ACCESSORY USE APPROVED SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ON CORNER LOTS • After a lengthy discussion, Finegan moved, seconded by Barry the following language amendment to Section 9-2.04 of the Code: • -2- Section 9-2.04 Accessory Buildings and Structures Subdivision 1 . Genera 1 c . ice-s~vey--bvr~r~-izrgs--inT-a-T~si~rtia~-distY-rct may-be--izrcat-e~-n-vt-~e-ss--than-fives-f 5~-feed-f-rvnrt~re-src~e ~rrt--fig-anrrf-zv~-f -~~--fiat--~-tfi~-rearr-fa-r rrn~ A c c e s s o r y buildings, other than garages in a residential district may be located not less than five feet from an interior side or rear lot line unless the accessory structure is located in the rear twenty percent of the lot, in which case they can be located not less than one foot from the interior side or rear lot line (overhangs may not extend into the one foot side or rear yard setback). Garages in a residential district may be located not less than five feet from an interior side or rear lot line unless they are located in the rear twenty percent of the lot, adjacent to an alley and oriented such that the vehicular access door does not face the alley in which case they can be located not less than one foot from an interior side or rear ]ot line (overhangs may not extend into the one foot side or rear yard setback). Accessory buildings, including garages, on a corner lot in a residential district, may be ]_ocated within the corner • side yard subject to a conditional use permit. The issuance of such permits shall comply with the provision in Section ~9-15.04 of this Code (conditional uses). Design and placement of such structures must be consistent with the surrounding residential district, and shall be evaluated based on the following criteria: visibility, height, safety and potential distraction to passing motorists. Upon a vote being taken, the following voted in favor thereof: Barry, Boche, Duncan, Finegan, and the following voted against the same: Black, Daykin and Grittner. Motion approved. Finegan moved, seconded by Boche, to request staff to review the fee structure for conditional use requests and set an economical fee structure for residential vs. commercial conditional use requests. Motion approved unanimously. Administrator Wiesner presented the Job Description for the Part-Time Planner and advised that four candidates will be interviewed for the position on Thursday, June 8. SETBACKS ON CORNER LOTS APPROVED PART-TIME PLANNER POSITION JOB DESCRIPTION • -3- • • Chairman Black indicated that the Subcommittee on the Parking Issue will be scheduling another meeting. Finegan moved, seconded by Barry to adjourn the Planning AnT~URNMENT Commission Meeting at 8:45 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Approved: 7 ro r Edgar ineg n, S retary Submitted by: Katherine J. i erman •