My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-05 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
09-14-05 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:41:45 PM
Creation date
6/6/2008 2:14:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 14, 2005 <br />Net Levy increase at 5.72% The second, Exhibit B demonsh~ates the <br />percentage change in the 2006 levy if the City levies back the 2006 cut, <br />Gross Levy increase at 8.02% and Net Levy increase at 10.84%. The <br />third, Exhibit C, calculates the percentage change in levy if the <br />infiastructure fund (electric franchise fee) absorbs the MVHC cut, Gross <br />Levy increase at 3.74% Net Levy increase at 5.95% <br />The Director explained that the Market Value Homestead Credit is a crediC <br />that the State gives on property taxes for lower valued homes. As home <br />valuations increase, the amount of credit decreases and is no longer <br />applicable once a home value reaches a certain point. The City <br />Administrator explained that homeowners are still getting the benefiC of <br />the MVHC, the State has decreased the amount of reimbursement to cities <br />for this credit. Again, LitCle Canada's reimbursement of this credit from <br />the State is anticipated to be less than $5,000. <br />The Finance Director indicated that under the three scenarios explained <br />above, the net levy increases range from 5.72% to 10.84%. She noted the <br />City's action in late 2003 initiating a franchise fee to deal with the State's <br />budget cuts and to help with funding trail completion. Given the fact that <br />the low end of 5.72% is not truly feasible, and given the past action of <br />establishing the franchise fee, it is staff's recommendation that the <br />Infrastnrcture Fund absorb a portion of Che MVHC cut. Based on that <br />recommendation, the Finance Director reported that the budget was <br />prepared assuming the Infrastructure Fund would absorb 50% of the <br />MVHC cut. As a result, the following are some of the key highlights for <br />the preliminary 2006 Budget: <br />• Our gross levy is projected to increase by 2.77% ($2,048,298 vs. <br />$2,131,418). <br />• Our net levy is projected to increase by 4.84% ($1,955,014 vs. <br />$1,864,775). <br />• Our Fiscal Disparities distribution has decreased by $31,178 <br />($235,465 vs. $266,643) and has a 2.l% negative impact on the net <br />levy. This is due to growth in our commercial tax base. <br />• Our Tax Capacity (tax base) has grown by over 16% based on <br />preliminary numbers submitted by the County ($11,123,960 vs. <br />$9,459,049). <br />• Our Tax Rate will drop from 23.682 to 21.432% in 2006. This is <br />a 9.5% reduction in our tax rate! <br />• We have implemented the levy for the Infrastructure Fund <br />based on the amount originally recommended by the Debt Levy <br />Reduction Committee ($157,200), less the 2006 MVHC cut of <br />$102,019 resulting in a levy of $55,181. Again, the franchise fees <br />on the electric utility are going to this fund. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.