My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-05 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
09-28-05 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:41:40 PM
Creation date
6/6/2008 2:15:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 28, 2005 <br />sewer system. <br />Von Riedel indicated acceptance. <br />City Engineer Recommendations: <br />Plat <br />An access limitation should be shown on the west lot line of Lot 1 to prevenC driveway <br />access to McMenemy Street. <br />Von Riedel indicated acceptance. <br />Grading Plan <br />1. A ten-foot bench graded for vehicle access should be provided around the top of all Che <br />ponds for future city maintenance. The access roads to the ponds should be designated <br />on the plan and must be within the drainage and utility easements granted. <br />Von Riedel indicated acceptance. <br />2. The plan indicates an ordinary high water level of the wetland to the north. The source of <br />this information should be provided and proof of its accuracy. <br />Von Riedel indicated acceptance. <br />Boulevard grades appear to be as steep as 3:1 in some areas. The Developer previously <br />agreed to grade a 5-foot boulevard behind the curb at 2% and a maximum of 3:1 slopes <br />after the boulevard. <br />Von Riedel indicated acceptance. <br />4. Several notes are included on the grading plan as to a maximum wall height of 4 feet. It <br />appears that the wall on Lot 3 is six feet high. All walls should be reviewed for a <br />maximum height of 4 feet and top and bottom wall elevations provided on all walls to <br />ensure this. <br />Von Riedel indicated acceptance. <br />5. The drainage Swale that is shown between Lot 3 and Lot 4 is not contained within the <br />drainage and utility easement that is being dedicated and is very close to the proposed <br />house pad location. The drainage ditch should be widened and constructed per the detail <br />provided in the plans. It may be necessary to grant a larger drainage and utility easement <br />so that the swale is entirely within the easement. It should also be noted that the drainage <br />swales will need Co be graded back to the edge of the no disturb zone to ensure that the <br />storm water runoff from each lot does not drain onto adjacent property behind the houses <br />in the area that can be graded and developed. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.