Laserfiche WebLink
Summary and Recammendation <br />The PUD appears to be in order, based on the City's zoning requirements and <br />Comprehensive Plan for the area. The one comment would relate to the layout of the <br />eight-unit building, and any additional effort that might decrease the exposure of parking <br />lots to the street. Also noted would be the landscaping plan issues highlighted in this <br />report, including the following: <br />• Landscaping along the south building line, and/or south property line. <br />• Landscaping along the east building line <br />As noted in the report, plat information is missing from the submission. Because the <br />Cify will want to review the layout of the plat, and the various restrictions affecting <br />basement use in the association documents, Planning staff recommends the following: <br />1. Approval of the Architectural design, subject to the comments related to <br />landscaping in this report. <br />2. Approval of the Planned Unit Development permit, subject to the site planning <br />and landscaping comments above, subject to the comments of the City <br />engineer, subject to approval of the Final Plat, and subject to approval of the <br />association documents by the City Attorney. <br />3. Tabling action on the Preliminary and Final Plats until the next scheduled <br />meetings to permit the applicant an opportunity to submit plat documents for <br />review. <br />pc: Kathy Glanzer <br />Steve Westerhaus <br />Lee Elfering <br />Greg Schroeder <br />John Mathern, Mendota Homes, 2345 Rice St., Ste 209, Roseville, MN 55113 <br />