Laserfiche WebLink
One other aspect to consider in this analysis relates to the creation of the in-house planner <br />position. Currently, the salary of the Code Enforcement/Utility Billing position is <br />allocated between the general fund (65.75%), the water fund (17.12%) and the sewer <br />fund (17.13%) to reflect duty assignments. If we create the new position, this employee's <br />salary should be 100% in the General Fund while the new part-time Utility Billing Clerk <br />would be 33% General Fund, 33% Water Fund and 34% Sewer fund. The net result of <br />this transaction would be to shift about $29,600 in costs to the General Fund to more <br />accurately reflect funding allocations. The reason to do this is to prevent the utility funds <br />from subsidizing general fund operations; thereby leading to higher utility rates. <br />Staff's perspective for Wednesday's meeting is we need to choose a levy percentage that <br />is acceptable. We do not necessarily have to decide on all of the options listed (or those <br />not yet discovered). However, by picking a percentage, we need to be relatively <br />confident it is attainable. Based on the Council's discussion at the last meeting, getting to <br />a 4% preliminary levy increase and a 3% final increase seems attainable at this time. <br />Further discussion regarding some of the options listed can continue over the next couple <br />of months before a final decision needs to be made. <br />