Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 23, 2015 <br />rational is to prevent the utility funds from subsidizing General Fund <br />operations, thereby leading to higher utility rates. <br />The Administrator again noted that items 1, 2, 4, and 5 are easy changes to <br />implement. However, the rest of the list will warrant more discussion. <br />Montour noted that as it stands the preliminary budget projects a 6.25% <br />net levy increase, and a more acceptable increase needs to be achieved. <br />He pointed out that the purpose of this evening meeting is to set the <br />preliminary 2016 Budget with additional work to be done in the future to <br />lower that number. <br />Keis pointed out the City's past practice to keep levy increases relatively <br />stable with the goal being a 3% increase or less. Keis indicated that there <br />will be a lot of discussion as the City moves forward in its budget process. <br />He indicated that he was comfortable with a preliminary levy increase of <br />4% with the goal being 3% or less for the final budget. Fischer agreed, <br />and pointed out that implementing items 1, 2, 4, and 5 result in a drop of <br />about 1.5%. Fischer stated that he would support a 4% increase for the <br />preliminary budget, and felt that a goal of a 3% increase or less was <br />achievable for the final budget. <br />Torkelson asked about the Truth In Taxation notices mailed by the <br />County, and whether or not property owners understood that the <br />preliminary budget increase may actually be lower when the final budget <br />is adopted. Keis described the notice which also includes levy increases <br />estimated by the County and School Districts. Montour indicated that <br />when he first moved to Little Canada and began receiving these notices, <br />he assumed that the preliminary increase projected was what the final tax <br />increase would be. Montour noted that the notices that property owners <br />receive contain contact information for the City, County, and School <br />Districts, and encouraged property owners to express any concerns they <br />might have to the appropriate agency. <br />The City Administrator reported that the upcoming newsletter will contain <br />an article describing the budget process. He noted that the Council will <br />adopt the final 2016 Budget in December. The Administrator also pointed <br />out that in addition to the levy increase, property value changes also <br />impact the amount of property taxes that an owner will pay. <br />The Parks & Recreation Director asked that the Council give careful <br />consideration to the Parks & Recreation Department staffing changes that <br />are identified in the September 18th report. The Director noted that while <br />he is a short -timer with the City, he felt it important to retain the current <br />staffing levels in order to maintain youth programs and promote <br />7 <br />