My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-2015 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
10-28-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2015 3:09:12 PM
Creation date
10/23/2015 2:54:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 13 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS <br />Figure 13.01-1 shows a classic, and more optimistic, example illustrating the benefits of TIF. In this <br />illustration the value of the property is on a trend to decline (or stagnate) over time absent any <br />intervention such as the use of TIF. The implementation freezes the value for tax purposes and the <br />investments raise the value of the property, placing it on a more positive long-term trend. The taxes <br />associated with the increased value are captured to pay for the investments, but plenty of benefit to all <br />taxing districts is realized in the prevention of further tax base erosion and additional tax base upon the <br />termination of the district. <br />Figures 13.01-2 and 13.01-3 display more critical, and sometimes pessimistic, examples of the impact of <br />TIF. In Figure 13.01-2, the premise is that the value—even if the TIF activities do induce a boost— <br />would increase over time and the freezing of the taxable value essentially takes value away from the <br />taxable base of the taxing districts. In this scenario there is some benefit down the road after the district <br />terminates, but it must be weighed against the cost of the lost tax base in the interim. <br />FIGURE 13.01-2 <br />A CRITICAL EXAMPLE OF TIF <br />V <br />A <br />L <br />U <br />E <br />TIF activities induce an <br />Increasing value, increase in valuation <br />no blight <br />TIF plan is•••••••••- <br />enacted• • • • • • • • Captured value <br />1 <br />TIF terminated <br />1 <br />Value would continue Original <br />to appreciate absent taxable <br />the use of TIF value <br />Benefit to other <br />Value hijacked from other <br />taxing jurisdictions <br />4 <br />taxing jurisdictions / <br />TIME <br />Figure 13.01-3 is the most pessimistic view, arguing that the development would have occurred without <br />TIF and therefore all of the captured value is a loss to the affected taxing districts, with no positive <br />benefit associated with what amounts to a pure subsidy. <br />Each of these scenarios has the potential to be true, ultimately making TIF a good tool only to the extent <br />that it is prudently and appropriately used. TIF might be best suited to redevelop blighted areas or to be <br />employed in situations where the free market fails to produce appropriate investment in a property. <br />Entities that use TIF must understand that capturing the tax base to pay for the development may keep it <br />from being available to lower taxes for general purposes. <br />TAX INCREMENT FINANCING <br />REVISION DATE: NOVEMBER, 2010 <br />13.01-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.