My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-2015 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
10-28-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2015 3:09:12 PM
Creation date
10/23/2015 2:54:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 13 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS <br />3. Identification of Value, Classification, Tax Capacity and Minimum Assessment <br />Agreements: <br />The market value, tax capacity and local tax rate that are considered as the base values for the <br />district are dependent upon the date the County Auditor receives the request for certification of <br />the final TIF district. If a request for certification is received on or before June 30, the <br />current payable year's estimated market value and local tax rate are to be considered as <br />the base values and rate. If the request for certification is received by the County <br />Auditor after June 30, the current assessment year's estimated market value and the <br />subsequent year's local tax rate are considered to be the base value and rate of the <br />district. The County Auditor should review the values and rates used in the assumptions and <br />should snake sure the TIF Authority has used the correct values when trying to determine <br />anticipated TIF revenues. <br />4. District Type & Duration (see Table 13.01-2 below) <br />a) Determination of Type of District — verify that the projects intended plans and the <br />acceptable district types are agreeable <br />b) Duration — The County should verify that the duration dates and planned decertification <br />dates are within the statutory guidelines. TIF Authorities can indicate a decertification <br />date/year that is less than the maximum amount of years to run. In some instances, TIF <br />plans assume a possible decertification date that is earlier than the maximum but do not <br />indicate that the district will definitely decertify upon that date. <br />5. Examination of Permits <br />The TIF plan must certify that no building permits had been issued on any of the affected <br />parcels for 18 months prior to the request for certification of the district. If permits have been <br />issued on any of the affected parcels, the improvement is not to be included within the retained <br />portion of the TIF District. <br />6. Examination of any Assessment Agreements <br />In some of the TIF plans, a certification of a minimum market value or assessment agreement <br />is indicated. There are cases where the minimum assessment agreement is referred to in a <br />development plan, which is generally recorded with the County Recorder. In any case, the <br />County Auditor should check with the County Assessor as to whether that office has seen the <br />plans for the improvements and if they had certified a minimum assessed value based upon the <br />plan. If nothing has been provided to the Assessor, the County Auditor should contact the TIF <br />Authority and question the validity of the agreement. <br />7. Financial Analysis <br />The County Auditor should review the assumptions and financial analysis sections of the TIF <br />plan. Some of the areas that the County should review are as follows: <br />a) Projected tax increment dollars <br />b) Sharing of increment <br />c) Fiscal Disparity Election <br />d) Bonded Debt <br />e) Percentage of NTC already in TIF in Municipality & County in comparison to total <br />TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 13,01 - g <br />REVISION DATE; NOVEMBER, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.