My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-2004 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
05-13-2004 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2008 10:06:54 AM
Creation date
7/16/2008 9:24:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ivtlNU~r;=s <br />CITY COtiNCII, <br />NOV"EV1[3IiR 26, 3003 <br />3165/3].67 information. <br />SPRUCE <br />S"TREET - iy-Ir. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />VALOR <br />RESOLUTIO_V N0. ?003-I I-370 - T_.~113LING ACTION ON THE <br />A,~fEND~LIENT TO CONDITION,~17_ USE PERdIIT AND U-1RIAzVCE <br />FOIZ 3165-3167 SPRUCE STREET, V.gLOR ENTERPRISES, <br />PENDIiVG A RECOfIL1IENDATION FRO~tit THE PLANNING <br />C0~>I~ifIS.SlON. <br />The fore<roing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, LaValle, Pahey, Montour, Anderson. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Arrl;^+,NDrviLN'T iVlayor Pahey opened the public hearing to consider an amendment to <br />TO ZON1N(; to the Zoning Code relative to accessory and principal buildings. Fahey <br />CODE - noted that the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the <br />ACCESSORY amendment. <br />& PRINCIPAL <br />BUI:GAINGS There was no one from the general public present wishing to comment on <br />this matter. <br />Upon motion by Fahey, seconded by Anderson, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />The City Planner indicated that the proposed amendment clarifies the <br />definitions of accessory use/building and principal use building as well as <br />establishes single-family dwelling performance requirements. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOL UTION N0. ?003-1I-27Z - A~'~ZENDING SECTION 902 OF <br />T77E LITTLE C=1N,4DA CZTY CODE ADDRESSING ACCESSORY <br />USE/BUILDL~VG,~1ND PRINCIR9L USE/BUILDING DEFINITIONS <br />AND ES7:-113I_ISHING SINGLE-F,4itiIIL Y D GVELLING <br />PERFOR,'pIANCE REn UIRE~LIENTS <br />The foreg>oin~s resolution ~~uas duty seconded by N[ontour. <br />ryes (5) LaValle, Ytontour, Anderson, Blesener, Fahey. <br />.Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Anderson noted the moratorium that is in puce relative to dais matter. The <br />Citv .yttornev noted that ,h~ moratorium ordinance contained an <br />a;uiration date and reoonumended ,hat it be showed to expire on its own. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.