My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-2004 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
11-24-2004 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:39:29 PM
Creation date
7/17/2008 9:30:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 24, 2004 <br />Millennium Charity plus for this additional funding and their support of <br />various City projects over the past several years. Total donations for the <br />project are now at $97,500. <br />Mayor Fahey added the City Council's thanks to Millennium Charity Plus <br />as we(I as Canadian Days and LC12A. <br />ARCHITEC- Mayor Fahey opened the Public Heating to consider the Architectural <br />TURAL Review of a proposed office condominium building at 206 Little Canada <br />REVIEW - Road proposed by have Rustad. It was noted that the City Planner has <br />20G LITTLE indicated that the proposal is not consistent with the City's Architectural <br />CANADA Guidelines relative to building materials. The Planning Commission has <br />ROAD - recommended approval subject to enhancement of entry points and review <br />DAVE RUS'I'A,D and approval of a landscaping plan for the site. <br />Fahey stated that it was his position that if the City has Architectural <br />Guidelines iu place, those guidelines should be followed. If the City is not <br />going to follow the guidelines, then they should be changed. Fahey stated <br />that he was not in agreement with the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation, and felt that the stand~u ds should be complied with. <br />Fahey asked Mr. Rustad why he cannot build the building utilizing brick <br />or stucco on the exterior in compliance with the Architectural Guidelines. <br />Dave Rustad reported that they are proposing a ledge rock on the lower <br />portion of the front of the building, around entrance doors, as well as on <br />the lower portion of the north elevation. In addition to this ledge rock, a <br />hardy board is proposed on the remainder of the building. Rustad reported <br />that hardy board is a masonry lap siding. It is a little more expensive than <br />stucco and about 60% more expensive than steel siding. Rustad presented <br />a picture of a building that has a hardy board siding. Rustad indicated that <br />lie would be open to using stucco, however, felt the hardy board siding <br />was a superior product. <br />'The City Planner indicated that hardy board is a fiber cement product that <br />did not exist at the time the Architectural Guidelines were drafted. <br />"therefore, hardy board was not included in the listing of masonry products <br />that meet the guidelines. The Planner indicated that the intent of the <br />guidelines is to ensure that the buildings in the business areas do not have <br />a residential appearance. <br />Blesener asked the lap widths being proposed. Rustad replied that he <br />would anticipate 6 to 12 inch widths. <br />Rustad noted that his building will be abutting some residential properties, <br />and he wanted to propose a building that fit with the area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.