My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-23-2003 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
07-23-2003 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:28:14 PM
Creation date
7/18/2008 3:35:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 23, 2003 <br />Planner further noted that the City Engineer's preference is for the first <br />plat proposal submitted. <br />Fahey indicated that the Council relies on its professional staff in these <br />matters, and it appears that the developer has done nothing to address the <br />recommendations of the City Planner and the City Engineer to bring the <br />plat into conformance with the Subdivision Ordinance. Fahey noted that <br />there is no hardship present to warrant varying from the Ordinance, and <br />recommended that the developer redraw the plat to bring it into <br />conformity. <br />Blesener asked if the cul-de-sac should be straight in from the intersection <br />or offset. The Planner replied that it was acceptable to offset the cul-de- <br />sac. The Planner suggested another possibility for addressing the issues <br />may be to enlarge the cul-de-sac. <br />Carlson asked for an explanation of the front yard setback that would be <br />required as it relates to R-1 zoning as well as the Shoreland Ordinance. <br />Fahey pointed out the explanation that was given to Mr. Carlson at the <br />Planning Commission meeting that the property is zoned R-1 and the <br />Shoreland Ordinance also applies. When two standards are applicable, it <br />is the more restrictive of the two standards that is enforced. The City <br />Planner explained that that was con~ect. <br />Fahey stated that it appeared to him that the developer has done nothing <br />since the Planning Commission meeting to bring the plat into conformance <br />with the Subdivision Ordinance and suggested that the developer do so. <br />He noted that the City is up against the 60-day requirement. Therefore, if <br />action is tabled until the August 13`x' meeting, the developer will have to <br />waive the 60-day requirement. Carlson requested action be tabled until <br />August 13°i so that they can redrawn the plat and indicated that he would <br />waive the 60-day requirement. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOL UTION NO. 2003-7--161-CONTINUING THE PUI3I,IC <br />HEARING ON THE HAMEL ESTATES PLAT UNTIL THE AUGUST <br />13, 2003 COUNCIL. MEETING SU73JECT TO THE APPLICANT <br />WAIVING THE 60-DAYREQUIREMENT AND WITIIOUT THAT <br />WAIVER, THE PRELIMINARYAND FINAL PLAT WILL. ]3E <br />DEEMED DENIED <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, LaValle, Blesener, Anderson, Montow•. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.