My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-2003 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
09-10-2003 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:28:46 PM
Creation date
7/18/2008 3:36:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 <br />PRELIMINARY The City Administrator presented the preliminary 2004 Budget and <br />2004 BUDGET requested that the Council take action this evening to certify the <br />preliminary 20041evy. The Administrator informed the Council that <br />staff's recommendation is to levy to the City's State-imposed levy limit of <br />$2,132,880, The Administrator noted that as part of the State's budget <br />crisis, aid to cities was cut. The State's aid cut for Little Canada was <br />$196,000. The State is allowing cities to levy back up to 60% of this lost <br />aid. <br />The Administrator pointed out that the preliminary 2004 Budget proposes <br />a 6.3% increase in the gross levy, which translates to a 7.36% increase in <br />the net levy. All of this levy increase is attributable to the recovery of lost <br />State aid. However, given that the City's tax capacity (tax base) has <br />grown by over I 1%, our tax rate will actually drop by 3.25%. <br />The Administrator pointed out that the State will use 2003 levy amounts in <br />determining levy limits going forward. Therefore, staff is recommending <br />levying to the State-imposed levy limit to ensure that the appropriate base <br />level is set. The Administrator noted that Ramsey County is levying to its <br />levy limit, as are many other municipalities. <br />The Administrator also pointed out that the State will likely have <br />continuing budget pressures; therefore, additional aid cuts to cities are <br />likely. Anderson asked what other aid are potential targets for State cuts. <br />The City Administrator felt the main target would be the Market Value <br />Homestead Credit. Other potential aid cuts would be PERA Aid, Fire <br />State Aid, and MSA dollars. The Administrator suggested that another <br />potential target would be city fund balances. The State has discussed <br />county, school district, and city unreserved fund balances, and sees these <br />dollars as a potential source of money that could be drawn down. The <br />Administrator noted that Little Canada has no unreserved fund balances. <br />He also explained that given the City only received tax dollars from the <br />County twice each year, the General Fund investment balance is used to <br />finance City operations for six months and prior to receipt of its first tax <br />settlement check. <br />The Administrator pointed out that one hears use of a business analogy for <br />the way government sector should be run. The Administrator pointed out <br />that when businesses are facing difficult financial times, the business <br />operation could be cut back as a result of operational slowdowns. The <br />government sector cannot do that, and cities have to continue to provide <br />police and fire protection, plow streets, service utilities, etc. The <br />Administrator noted that during difficult financial times, there is typically <br />an increase in demand for public services. Fahey noted that the City does <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.