My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-2003 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
09-10-2003 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:28:46 PM
Creation date
7/18/2008 3:36:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 <br />the site. The townoffice concept is proposed as two stories in height with <br />each unit consisting of approximately 2,000 square feet. <br />LaValle pointed out that parking has become a huge issue in the area of <br />the Market Place Shopping Center, and indicated that the developer should <br />be informed that the development will have to have adequate parking. <br />Fahey pointed out that while the Council's preference appears to be the <br />townoffice concept, which should in no way be construed as approval of a <br />14-unit townoffice development. <br />Anderson asked George Sherman's feelings relative to the marketability of <br />the townoffice proposal. The City Administrator indicated that Sherman <br />contemplated a townoffice development on this site. The Administrator <br />indicated that while Sherman will be proceeding with the development of <br />some office complexes south along Rice Street, it is felt that the <br />townoffice concept will not compete with what Sherman is proposing. <br />Montour expressed some concern with the townoffice market, indicating <br />that it does not appear the Edgewater or the Tacheny projects are full. The <br />City Administrator indicated that it was his understanding that all the units <br />in those two projects have been sold. Blesener suggested that there would <br />be some synergy at work in having this type of development in close <br />proximity. <br />2 A.M. BAR LaValle indicated that the Cities of St. Paul, Roseville, and Maplewood <br />CLOSING have approved 2 a.m. bar' closings, and two of the bar owners in the City <br />have requested that Little Canada consider doing the same. <br />Fahey stated that he did not view these cities adopting the 2 a.m. closing <br />time as an overwhelming tide, and saw no reason to change the bar closing <br />time. Blesener suggested that if the bar owners are interested staying open <br />until 2 a.m., they should submit a written request asking for Council <br />consideration of the issue. Anderson also suggested that the bar owners <br />provide information documenting that they are losing money by not being <br />allowed to stay open until 2 a.m. <br />Fahey stated that he still favored taking the wait and see approach on this <br />matter to see if there is a compelling business justification or need for the <br />City to allow bars to remain open until 2 a.m. <br />ADJOURN Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2003-9-2I0 - AD.IOURNING <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.