My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-2003 Planning Comm. Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
07-10-2003 Planning Comm. Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2008 2:02:36 PM
Creation date
7/22/2008 1:49:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JULY 10, 2003 <br />Motion seconded by Wojcik. <br />Motion carried 3 - 2. Knudsen and Keis voted against. <br />rINAL PLAT - Kevin Von Reidel, Dayspring Development, appeared before the <br />THE PRESERVE Commission requesting final plat approval for The Preserve. Jeff <br />McDonnell, ProTerra Design, presented the revised final plat to the <br />Commission. McDonnell began by reviewing specific details of the City <br />Engineer's recommendations indicating either their agreement with the <br />recommendation or that they would work with the City Engineer to <br />address the issues raised. <br />McDonnell indicated that based on the City Engineer's and City Planner's <br />reports the primary discussion point appears to be the retaining walls <br />which are proposed as part of The Preserve. McDonnell indicated that <br />they agree with the City Engineer's recommendation that the retaining <br />walls being used along the road would be poured concrete and engineered <br />and built in compliance with MN DOT specifications. McDonnell pointed <br />out that the retaining walls are necessary because of the grades involved in <br />maintaining an adequate cover over Williams Pipeline at the location <br />where Preserve Trail crosses over the pipeline. <br />With regard to the individual retaining walls planned on the back of many <br />of the lots, McDonnell indicated that the City Engineer would be <br />responsible for ensuring that these walls are installed correctly. As each <br />individual lot is developed, the City Engineer will need to guide the <br />construction process to ensure that the walls on the back of the lots are <br />installed correctly. McDonnell reported that Dayspring is agreeable to <br />addressing the retaining wall issue as part of the Development Agreement <br />including, for example, the types of materials that must be used, the <br />requirements for each individual wall to be engineered based on the type <br />of house to be constructed as well as the type of soils on each lot. <br />McDonnell again indicated that the City Engineer will have to review <br />building plans for each house as it is constructed and ensure that the <br />retaining wall is properly engineered and installed. McDonnell indicated <br />that Dayspring will be liable to sell lots that are buildable. However, the <br />specific details of each of the retaining walls cannot be known until the <br />type of house to be constructed on each individual lot is known. The City <br />Engineer will have to work with the property owner at the time of house <br />construction. <br />Keis asked the height of these retaining walls. McDonnell indicated that <br />the wall along the street will be between 8 and 10 feet in height at its <br />highest point and 4 feet in some areas. McDonnell pointed out that any <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.