Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMNII551ON <br />NOVEMBER 13, 2003 <br />that outdoor storage can be allowed by CUP. Keis stated that he was not <br />in favor of a lot of outdoor storage on the property. <br />Sedaghat pointed out the storage on the Frattalone site. Knudsen pointed <br />out that Frattalone stores organic material versus the vehicles proposed by <br />Valor. <br />Knudsen stated that he agreed with Keis' position allowing the storage of <br />50 repairable vehiclesin the back and 30 vehicles in the sales lot to be <br />moved to the front. <br />Sedaghat and Peterson felt that code enforcement issues in Ryan Industrial <br />Park have been handled unevenly from one property to the next. Peterson <br />indicated that they have complied with all the requirements made by the <br />City. <br />Keis disagreed, pointing out that Valor is has relocated their sales lot to <br />the front of the property in violation of their CUP and has no permit for <br />the outdoor storage that is occurring on the property. <br />Sedaghat indicated that he has people who pick up the tires, radiators, and <br />other recyclables. However, they pick up these materials when their <br />schedules permit. Sedaghat indicated that he has no control over this. <br />Keis suggested that Sedaghat would have the ability to control the <br />scheduled pick-up of recyclables under a contract situation. <br />The City Planner suggested that action on the CUP amendment be tabled <br />given that the applicant does not agree with the conclusions of the City <br />Engineer and has indicated the desire to hire their own engineer to review <br />the site. The Planner further noted that the site plan submitted does not <br />reflect what the applicant wants to do with the site. The Planner <br />recanmended that the applicant be required to submit a proposed site plan <br />that clearly reflects how they proposed to utilize the site. <br />Roycraft indicated that he is confused about the nature of Valor's <br />business. He also expressed concern about the viability of the business <br />and the fact that any CUP that is approved for this property would run <br />with the property and is able to be transferred to another business. <br />Peterson felt that any CUP that is approved for Valor would only reflect <br />the Valor business and would not be able to be transferred to another <br />business. <br />Keis outlined the issues that need to be resolved. The first is the <br />relocation of the retail sales lot to the front of the property. Keis asked <br />-5- <br />