My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-2002 Planning Comm. Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
07-11-2002 Planning Comm. Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2008 12:04:39 PM
Creation date
7/23/2008 11:47:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MrNU•rrs <br />PLANNING COM~~IISSION <br />JULY 11, 2002 <br />T)RIV>/ - operating his business from this property anti has been allowed to have <br />CARL JOHNSON a small amount of outdoor storage in conjunction with the business. <br />Germanson reported that their proposal is to retain the B-W Zoning along <br />the front of the property, but have 1-1 Zoning on the back parcel He <br />reviewed the site plan showing the proposal to divide this property into <br />three lots. He also reviewed the proposed road plan through the property <br />German pointed out that Lot 2 as proposed would contain the existing <br />Knox building, Lot I is proposed to have a future building of 30,450 <br />square feet, and Lot 3 would be the 1-I lot that would contain Carl <br />Johnson's business. German pointed out Johnson is planning to add a <br />70,000 square Foot ol7ice/showroom building and a possible another <br />30,000 square foot building on Lot 3. <br />Keis asked if Johnson planned to sell the front two lots. Germanson <br />indicated that he may sell the properties under either a building to suit <br />arrangement, o~ may develop them as rental property. <br />Germanson pointed out that they wanted to make a distinedve line <br />between the B-AN Zoning on the front and the I-I on the back He pointed <br />out that their plan includes eliminating the 0,000 square foot building that <br />is immediately behind (he I<noa building. Germanson also noted that the <br />buildings on the fi ani two lots will provide sa~ecning for the back <br />property. Germanson indicated that the Watershed has indicated that there <br />are no ponding requircinen(s for this property. He further pointed out that <br />the southern portion of Lot > has very poor soils. <br />Knudsen asked if the canopies would come down. Germanson reported <br />that they would eliminate the three-sided shed that would straddle the <br />property line bcnvicen L.ot I end Lot 3 However, their plan would be to <br />leave the other three canopy structures, except for about half of one of <br />these canopies that would be eliminated if the 10,000 square foot <br />office/showroom building is consu'ucted on Lot 3, <br />Germanson reported that they ~~~ould be seeking Ttl' assistance for the <br />development oP f_ot I, and then indicated that perhaps a 20,000 square foot <br />building would be developed on this lot. <br />Knudsen asked why the Ihree canopies arc proposed to remain. Johnson <br />reported that as part of the rezonin~~ of Lot 3, they are seeking outdoor <br />storage on this property. Johnson indicated that the outdoor storage would <br />be screened by the existing and proposed buildings on this site as well as <br />by the addition of landscaping. <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.