Laserfiche WebLink
Sewer <br /> <br />The 2015 Sewer Utility Fund budgeted a loss of $52,520. The projected 2015 results yield a surplus <br />of $22,410. <br /> <br />In reviewing rate comparisons, staff believes our minimum sewer charge is too high for lower <br />volume users. In 2014, we reduced our minimum sewer charge from $55 per quarter to $50. We <br />were able to do that given the dramatic reduction in treatment costs paid to Metropolitan <br />Environmental Services at that time. Currently, the $50 minimum has covered usage up to 15,000 <br />gallons based on winter quarter water usage. Users of 6,000 gallons are paying $8.33per 1,000 <br />gallons of sewer usage versus our rate of $3.58 for users of over 15,000 gallons. That disparity is <br />seems too high. <br /> <br />Staff is also recommending that we add/clarify some other situations. They are: <br />1. Winter quarter water usage is the basis for sewer billings for all residential properties. Staff <br />is recommending that properties with over four units will have sewer charges based on each <br />quarter’s water usage; subject to a minimum charge based on usage of 8,000 gallons per <br />quarter, per unit. The rational for this is the larger complexes all have deduct meters for <br />irrigation uses. Therefore, high water usage would mean high sewer usage also. Another <br />factor is in looking at usage by quarter for larger complexes, a number of them have lower <br />water usage in subsequent quarters versus the winter quarter. (See Water Usage Analysis <br />Chart attached) <br />2. Sewer only accounts with private wells will remain at the $50 per quarter minimum. The <br />reasoning for this is we have no idea of sewer usage given no meter readings exist. In many <br />cases actual sewer flows could result in higher charges than $50. <br />3. Sewer only billing accounts connected to a municipal water supply (VH apartments on <br />Count Road D) will have their minimum increased to $55 per quarter if no water meter <br />readings are supplied. In this case, VH has decided not to provide us with water usage <br />amounts. In our own research, we learned that they would be using more than our 8,000 <br />gallon minimum assumption. This charge is more representative of actual usage that was <br />observed at the affected complexes. <br /> <br />Staff has undertaken an analysis of our sewer rates and usage to evaluate changes in our rate <br />structure. Based on this review, here are the key factors for your consideration: <br /> <br />• We need to generate about $60,000 to $70,000 of new revenue based on 2016 projections. <br />• If we keep our same rate structure of a $50 minimum, but increase the per 1,000 gallon rate <br />from 3.58 to 3.95 or just over 10%, we generate about $64,000 in new revenue. All users <br />of 13,000 or less gallons will see no increase in rates (this covers the vast majority of our <br />residential users) and the highest impact would be to 15,000 gallon users who would see a <br />19% increase. (That is due to the minimum gallons falling from 15,000 to 13,000 which <br />gives 2,000 gallons of usage at the per gallon rate that did not previously exist. The total <br />increase to this volume user equals $18.70 per quarter. <br />• If we simply lowered the minimum charge to $45 per quarter and increased the rate to $4.00 <br />per 1,000 gallons, we only generate about $2,100 of additional revenue for the year. While <br />this lowers the number of gallons covered by the minimum from 15,000 to 11,000, it <br />negatively impacts the revenue generation because so many customers are within this <br />range. This results in too great of a shift between users across the range of customers. <br /> <br /> <br /> 8