Laserfiche WebLink
Do Housing Rehabs Pay Their Way? 4 3 3 <br />Exhibit 1 diagrams the relationship between CDC housing rehab activities and <br />their fiscal, economic, and social benefits and costs. CDC programs receive <br />subsidies from local governments (which are fiscal costs in this analysis). The <br />CDCs use these local government funds, combined with fiinds from other sources <br />including national organizations and sale of completed housing products, to <br />rehabilitate housing. This activity generates social and economic impacts. These <br />economic impacts in turn generate fiscal (on -budget) benefits, which are used to <br />Offset fiscal costs. The relationship of fiscal benefits and costs, expressed in a <br />ratio, is a primary indicator of fiscal efficiency. <br />Moving from the fiscal dimension on top of Exhibit 1 through the economic and <br />toward the social dimension on the bottom, quantification of the benefit -cost <br />factors becomes increasingly more difficult. Question marks next to the economic <br />Exhibit 1 I CDC Housing Rehabilitation Programs and Social, Economic and Fiscal Flows <br />Costs (Exhibit 3) <br />1) Administrative <br />2) Building in Kind <br />3) Mortgages/Loans/Grants <br />4) Infrastructure <br />5) Property Tax Abatement <br />6) Technical Expertise <br />s <br />Benefits (Exhibit 3) <br />1) Construction Income Tax <br />2) Direct Property Tax <br />FISCAL 3) Indirect Property Tax <br />4) Loan Repayment <br />5) Material Sales Tax <br />6) New Occupant Income Tax <br />7) New Occupant Sales Tax <br />ECONOMIC <br />Benefits (Exhibit 8) <br />l) Job Creation <br />2) Minority Contractors <br />3) Economic Impacts <br />4) Retail/Material Sales <br />5) Increased Property Value <br />Cost (?) <br />Benefits <br />1) Providing low-income households with <br />affordable housing <br />2) Improved quality of housing & satisfaction <br />SOCIAL 3) Increased home equity/ access to credit market <br />4) Benefits of homeownership on the family <br />Lj' 5) Improved Neighborhood stability <br />Cost (?) <br />J R E R I Vol. 25 No. 4 — 2003 <br />13 <br />