My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-21-2016 ADDITIONS Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
12-21-2016 ADDITIONS Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 10:28:19 AM
Creation date
1/4/2017 2:57:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Heidi Heller <br />Subject:FW: AY Exclusive Sales Listing Agreement - LITTLE CANADA - Owasso 12.21.2016 <br />Attachments:AY Exclusive Sales Listing Agreement - LITTLE CANADA - Owasso 12.21.2016.docx <br /> <br />Below in red are the changes recommended by the City Attorney to the listing agreement. You will note they made a <br />number of the requested changes, but not all of them. <br /> Number 2 is the one year term. With the 30‐day cancellation, this isn’t a big deal. <br /> Number 3 is to protect the broker. They don’t want a contact coming to us and we negotiate a deal without <br />their involvement. Given our control on what we accept, this isn’t a problem in my opinion. <br /> Number 5 deals with the commission. As we discussed at the workshop, this is a standard commercial listing <br />commission arrangement. <br /> Number 7 deals with indemnification over commission payment. Given the exposure, I think the language is ok. <br /> Number 8 is their corporate position. Your call on how you want to handle it. I’m not overly concerned, but I <br />guess you never know. <br /> <br />Comments from Bruce Bahneman: <br /> <br />Joel, <br /> <br />The following modifications to the listing agreement have made: <br /> <br /> <br />#1 – AY made the change ‐ Listing price. ‐ A set listing price is necessary to determine whether or not the agent has <br />satisfied its obligations under the listing contract. In this matter there is no set price. I would recommend adding the <br />additional language to ii: <br />“The Owner is not obligated to accept any purchase agreement from AY until the terms of said purchase are <br />approved by the Owner’s City Council.” <br /> <br />#2 – Agreement terms will remain as proposed ‐ Term. This is a one year listing contract which is approximately double <br />the usual term for a commercial listing agreement. <br /> <br />#3 – Agreement terms will remain as proposed ‐ Owner Referrals. Under the terms of this agreement AY is the sole <br />negotiating agent for the City. The City is not allowed to negotiate any terms of the purchase on its own. <br /> <br />#4– AY made the change ‐ viii. Needs to be amended to include the following: <br />“The Owner has no obligation to pay a commission until such time as the Owner’s City Council approves a <br />purchase agreement and there is a successful closing of said purchase agreement.” <br /> <br />#5 – Agreement terms will remain as proposed ‐ Under the terms of their agreement, if an outside broker is used by the <br />Buyer, you will pay an additional 2% commission on top of the 8% you are already paying AY. Standard practice is to <br />pay the Buyer’s agent out of the commission due the listing agent, AY. <br /> <br />#6‐ Made the change but kept commission schedule as we proposed – Alternative Transaction. If in lieu of a purchase <br />agreement, AY negotiates an option the commission should be the standard 8% due when the buyer exercises the <br />option and there is a successful closing. Mere execution of an option should not trigger a claim for commission. In <br />terms of leases, which would be another alternative transaction, there is no local custom that I am aware of. Either <br />you or I will need to research what rates are being charged for negotiating a commercial lease. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.