My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-2002 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
02-13-2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:05:38 PM
Creation date
7/23/2008 2:05:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 13, 2002 <br />Scalze asked if Morton was in negotiations with any other prospective tenants. <br />Morton replied that he is in discussions with a dentist that would like to be <br />located in this area. <br />Morton noted that US Bank is requiring apre-lease of 45% of the building. If <br />that pre-lease is accomplished, then conventional financing is in place. Morton <br />stated that he would prefer to obtain his own financing, but asked the City's <br />position on providing short-term financing should the pre-lease requirement <br />not be met. Morton indicated that he should know within the next couple of <br />weeks whether the mechanical company will proceed with a lease. <br />Scalze asked if there would be any fumes or odors as a result of the testing <br />function that the mechanical company performs. Morton replied that there <br />would not He anticipated that 1,000 to 2,000 square feet of the 20,000 square <br />feet they need would be utilized for testing. He noted that the use would be <br />primarily ofi'ice in nature. Morton again described his idea of putting a <br />basement under a portion of the building for this mechanical company's testing <br />operation. <br />Morton stated that he will present City staff with the results of his negotiations <br />within the next couple of weeks. He indicated that he would then like to <br />proceed with finalization of a development agreement as soon as possible. <br />Morton again asked if he would have public financing to fall back on should <br />the pre-lease requirement for the conventional financing not be met. <br />The City Administrator noted that public financing does present some risk to <br />the City since there may be no tenants for the building in the short-term. <br />I-Iowever, the City would have the developer's equity position to fall back on. <br />"fhe Administrator suggested that he have Ehlers & Associates review the <br />developer's financing position over the next couple of weeks and put together <br />a risk analysis for the Council's consideration. <br />Montour stated that he is struggling with the idea of the City providing short- <br />term tnancing. Montour noted that it appears redevelopment is imminent for <br />the southeast corner, and suggested that the City not rush into any financing <br />commitments at this point. Montour stated that he wanted to ensure that <br />whatever happens on the northeast corner compliments the redevelopment that <br />occurs on the southeast corner. <br />Fahey felt that the two developments will complement one another and noted <br />that the City will require that coordination occurs. <br />Morton stated that he wanted to get a development agreement in place to level <br />the playing field. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.