Laserfiche WebLink
M 1N U'TES <br />CITY COl1NC1L <br />~GBRUARY 27, 2002 <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, LaValle, Montour, Fahey, Anderson. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />RECI!;SS At this point in the meeting, 9:30 p.m., Council took a short recess. The <br />meeting was reconvened at 9:42 p.m. <br />CALL FOR Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />I'UBL1C <br />HEARING - RE.SOL UT/ON NO. 20112-2-4 / -CAL/_/NG A PU13LlC HEARING <br />ZONING TOCONSIDERAZON/NGCODEAMENDMENTAI_LOW/NG <br />CODE .STORM SHELTERSA.SAC'OND/TIONALU.SE <br />AMENllM.ENT <br />RELATIVE The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />TO STORM Ayes (5) Scalze, LaValle, Montour, Anderson, Fahey. <br />SIiELTERS Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />TWIN LAKE The City Administrator reviewed his report relative to an amendment <br />PINES to the Twin Lake fines Development Agreement which would allow <br />DEVELOPMENT the combination ofOutlot A with Lot 12 The Administrator noted <br />AGREEMENT that Outlot A was originally platted as a common area for the Twin Lake Pines <br />development. The developer is requesting that Outlot A be combined with Lot <br />12. It is his position thaC this will better protect from the use of this area as an <br />access to the adjacent park in Vadnais Heights. <br />Scalze suggested that if the amendment is approved, that the following <br />language be added to the end of the sentence in #2, °or access to "Twin Lake <br />other than the owner's personal single-family use". <br />Len Pratt, developer of'fwin Lake Pines, appeared before the Council and <br />related the intention in creating Outlot A as to establish sane common <br />property for the development while ensuring that Outlot A could not be <br />commingled with the Vadnais Heights Park. Pratt felt that combining the <br />ownership of Outlot A with Lot 12 would better serve this purpose. Pratt felt <br />the property would be better maintained and that taxes would be paid if it were <br />owned by one individual rather than under the common ownership of the <br />development. <br />Fahey stated that he wanted to ensure that the property would not be <br />subdividable. Pratt agreed, and indicated that there would be restrictions <br />placed on the deed to prevent the future subdivision of the property. Pratt also <br />indicated that there are easements over this property that would also restrict the <br />ability to develop this land. Pratt felt that combining Outlot A with Lot 12 <br />1~ <br />