Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> <br />Property). These areas had additional restrictions and were late season additions. No deer were <br />taken from these areas in 2011. <br />In 2012, hunt areas again remained essentially the same. 20 deer taken in Little Canada and an <br />additional 7 were taken in the Spoon Lake area, a new site added by the City of Maplewood in <br />2012. <br />In 2013, 12 deer were taken from approved hunt areas. An additional eight deer were taken in <br />Maplewood in the Spoon Lake Area and Fisher’s Corner. <br />In 2014, only six deer were taken in Little Canada. An additional seven deer were taken in <br />nearby Maplewood properties (See Exhibit B). <br />In 2015, the only permit issued was for the Frattalone Property. No hunting on other sites was <br />permitted. <br />In 2016, no hunting was permitted within the City. <br />It is important to state that it is not the City’s intent to eradicate deer from the community. <br />Rather, deer are considered to be a valuable element of Little Canada’s ecosystem in <br />which, absent natural predators, humans must assume the role of controlling the deer <br />population at healthy and socially acceptable levels. <br />It appears the majority of residents favor the City’s efforts to attempt to control the population. <br />The number of complaints about deer impacts to property had been increasing prior to the <br />program’s implementation. As we have continued our efforts and as the population has dropped, <br />complaints have subsided. <br />Our Control Program has been publicized in the City’s newsletter and been the subject of <br />conversation at many Council Meetings. In 2011, the City’s Community Survey was completed. <br />We specifically asked about our wildlife control programs. The results of that survey show <br />support for this type of effort with 59% deeming this program essential or very important <br />and only 9% calling it “unimportant”. Furthermore, when discussing funding of this program, <br />78% wanting to maintain or increase the service while 21% wanted to cut or eliminate funding. <br />It should also be noted that “out-of-pocket” expenditures for the deer control program are very <br />low relative to the City’s Budget and runs well less than $1,000 per year. There is staff time <br />devoted to coordinating the program that is not accounted for in that number. <br />Deer Management Goal/Objectives/Policies <br />Management Goal: Manage white-tailed deer populations within the city at socially acceptable <br />levels. <br />Management Objectives: <br />• Develop an operational management program to maintain deer populations within <br />acceptable limits <br />• Maintain an overall deer population in the community of approximately 10 deer per <br />square mile (40 deer) <br />• Manage deer populations within the City so as not to exceed 20 deer per square mile