My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-09-2017 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
08-09-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 10:28:07 AM
Creation date
8/21/2017 1:55:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> <br />Property). These areas had additional restrictions and were late season additions. No deer were <br />taken from these areas in 2011. <br />In 2012, hunt areas again remained essentially the same. 20 deer taken in Little Canada and an <br />additional 7 were taken in the Spoon Lake area, a new site added by the City of Maplewood in <br />2012. <br />In 2013, 12 deer were taken from approved hunt areas. An additional eight deer were taken in <br />Maplewood in the Spoon Lake Area and Fisher’s Corner. <br />In 2014, only six deer were taken in Little Canada. An additional seven deer were taken in <br />nearby Maplewood properties (See Exhibit B). <br />In 2015, the only permit issued was for the Frattalone Property. No hunting on other sites was <br />permitted. <br />In 2016, no hunting was permitted within the City. <br />It is important to state that it is not the City’s intent to eradicate deer from the community. <br />Rather, deer are considered to be a valuable element of Little Canada’s ecosystem in <br />which, absent natural predators, humans must assume the role of controlling the deer <br />population at healthy and socially acceptable levels. <br />It appears the majority of residents favor the City’s efforts to attempt to control the population. <br />The number of complaints about deer impacts to property had been increasing prior to the <br />program’s implementation. As we have continued our efforts and as the population has dropped, <br />complaints have subsided. <br />Our Control Program has been publicized in the City’s newsletter and been the subject of <br />conversation at many Council Meetings. In 2011, the City’s Community Survey was completed. <br />We specifically asked about our wildlife control programs. The results of that survey show <br />support for this type of effort with 59% deeming this program essential or very important <br />and only 9% calling it “unimportant”. Furthermore, when discussing funding of this program, <br />78% wanting to maintain or increase the service while 21% wanted to cut or eliminate funding. <br />It should also be noted that “out-of-pocket” expenditures for the deer control program are very <br />low relative to the City’s Budget and runs well less than $1,000 per year. There is staff time <br />devoted to coordinating the program that is not accounted for in that number. <br />Deer Management Goal/Objectives/Policies <br />Management Goal: Manage white-tailed deer populations within the city at socially acceptable <br />levels. <br />Management Objectives: <br />• Develop an operational management program to maintain deer populations within <br />acceptable limits <br />• Maintain an overall deer population in the community of approximately 10 deer per <br />square mile (40 deer) <br />• Manage deer populations within the City so as not to exceed 20 deer per square mile
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.