Laserfiche WebLink
<br />year’s levy increase versus just reducing the tax rate. Another way to think of it is we increase <br />the levy by $150,000; the growth in the tax base from decertifying 3-2 will offset that amount <br />essentially acting like a 0% levy increase. <br /> <br />If we can take advantage of Falcon Heights joining the contract group and the <br />decertification of TIF District 3-2, our levy increases by $179,836 while our tax rate <br />projects at 25.001. This means to have an effective 0% impact on a tax payer with no <br />valuation change, we would need to reduce the levy by $29,836. <br /> <br />This budget maintains our current amount of Local Government Aid (LGA) usage in the General <br />Fund ($146,901) even though our LGA allotment is increasing by $41,749 in 2018. By <br />maintaining the same amount of LGA in the GF, we are effectively working toward our goal of <br />reducing our GF reliance on LGA given our increasing expenditures. The percentage of LGA in <br />the General Fund in 2017 is 40.9%. In 2018, that percentage drops to 38.5% based on the initial <br />numbers. (Note: We are certified to receive $432,383 of LGA in 2018 versus the $390,634 we <br />received this year. The balance of $285,482 is going to the General Capital Improvement Fund <br />per policy.) <br /> <br />On the General Fund revenue side, the one major adjustment is the addition of a reimbursement <br />from Hoggsbreath for the cost of weekend deputy service. This is an offsetting expense in the <br />Sheriff’s Contract. WE also reflect less TIF administrative fees assuming the decertification of <br />TIF 3-2. We have continued to budget building permit revenues very conservatively for two <br />reasons. One reason is without much undeveloped land, it is tough to plan for consistent new <br />construction given redevelopment is usually needed. The other reason is we want to avoid <br />shortfalls during economic downturns that would force other expense reductions to keep the <br />budget balanced. In a year when activity is higher than those projections, we will typically see a <br />transfer to the General Capital Improvement Fund which also helps keep pressure off levy <br />increases to support capital expenditures. <br /> <br />On the expense side of things, they are up 6.2% in the General Fund. Some of the major expense <br />drivers are as follows: <br /> <br />• Election costs return which adds $17,250. <br />• Sheriff’s costs as previously discussed. <br />• We are anticipating health insurance cost increases of 15%. <br />• From a salary perspective, we projected a 4.0% cost of living adjustment salary scales <br />plus steps. This percentage is higher than the typical cost of living, but I believe we <br />might be lagging in some key positions. Therefore, this budget is more aggressive to <br />accommodate potential adjustments. A more detailed study will be prepared and <br />discussed at a later date. <br />• In the Parks & Recreation area, we budgeted at current staffing levels which increases <br />costs by about $33,500. We also transferred some temp salaries from Public Works to <br />reflect utilization. Overall, this department is up 15.52%. <br /> <br /> <br />