Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> STAFF REPORT <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />TO: Mayor Keis and Members of City Council <br /> <br />FROM: Heidi Heller, City Clerk <br /> <br />DATE: October 6, 2017 <br /> <br />RE: Ordinance 820, Amending the Fee Schedule for Licenses & Development Fees <br /> <br /> <br />Staff is proposing amendments to the Fee Schedule. The additions are shown in blue and the <br />deletions are stricken and shown in red. The new fee for an intoxicating liquor license for <br />billiard halls is added as discussed at the last Council meeting. The amendment to the <br />parades/public assembly fee is simply to correct the amount so it is consistent with the permit <br />cost indicated in the City Code. <br /> <br />Since most of the planning applications are now being handled by the Associate Planner, staff <br />has determined that the fee structure should be changed to better serve applicants and simplify <br />internal processing. Costs for processing planning cases in-house are much lower than they had <br />been with the planning consultant. Currently, in order to determine how much each planning <br />applicant will be charged when the case is complete, staff tracks every case’s consultant <br />invoices, public hearing mailing and publishing costs, and city staff time, and then adds an <br />administrative fee (20% of the total costs or $100, whichever is higher). Since costs are much <br />lower with the Associate Planner, we found that most applicants are now receiving a refund. <br /> <br />Staff is proposing that the Developer Deposits be changed to Development Fees, and they would <br />now be a flat fee rather than a deposit. There is also language added above the development fee <br />list stating that applications are subject to additional charges for consulting costs or excess staff <br />time and may be charged in addition to the initial development fee. <br /> <br />As you can see, most of the development fees are lower than the developer’s deposits were. This <br />will better serve applicants by not having to pay as much up front, or wait for a refund, and also <br />simplify internal processing of planning application costs and eliminate processing refunds. <br />Staff will monitor cases that are more involved to determine if the applicant should be charged <br />more. In some instances, staff will know at the time of application that the case will be more <br />complicated and require additional funds upfront. <br /> <br />Staff also suggests adding a few more fee types to the fee schedule to help applicants know how <br />much the fee will be for their specific request. <br /> <br />Staff recommends the Council adopt Ordinance 820, amending the Fee Schedule relating to <br />Licenses and Development Fees. <br /> <br />