Laserfiche WebLink
n1INUT>/s <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 24, 2002 <br />CA[3LE TV Council Member Montour reported that the City's Cable TV Producer <br />AWARDS was recently awarded City Producer of the Year by CTV Channel 15. The <br />Little Canada I Iistorical Society's video was awarded a Showcase <br />Programming Award. <br />PUD P1JRM,IT Mayor Fahey opened the Public Hearing to consider a Planned Unit <br />~ Development Permit and Architectural Review for the development of <br />ARCFIITECTURAl,nrne townof£ces at 2990 Rice Street as proposed by Dan and Pete Tacheny. <br />RLVII;W - It was noted that both the City Planner and the Planning Commission have <br />2990 RICJJ STR. - recommended approval subject to some conditions. <br />TACH_ENY <br />Scalze asked for clarification on the issue of an easement for a sidewalk along <br />Rice Street. The City Planner reported that the applicant has agreed to provide <br />au easement for a sidewalk along Rice Street- The Planner pointed out that <br />there is adequate right-of-way along South Owasso Blvd. for a sidewalk. <br />Anderson pointed out that there is a 10-foot setback proposed along Rice <br />Street, and questioned the ability to fit a sidewalk into that area. The City <br />Planner agreed Chat the area between the edge of the roadway and the proposed <br />buildings would be narrow, but felt there was room fora 5 to 6 foot wide <br />sidewalk. 'T'here will be a limited area for landscaping. <br />Jim Trossen, architect representing the Tacheny's, reviewed the landscape plan <br />and noted that there was a total of 180 landscaping plants/trees proposed for <br />the site. It was noted that actual plant materials may be modified to provide <br />for salt-tolerant plantings along the edge of the roadways. <br />Montour asked about signage. Trossen indicated that a brick and stucco <br />monument sign was proposed for the corner of Rice Street and South Owasso <br />Slvd. However, the specific design of the sign has not yet been determined. <br />Trossen reviewed the site plan and noted that the 68 parking stalls proposed <br />meet ordinance requirements. He also noted that the parking IoC would be lit, <br />and location of those lights will be determined by their engineer. <br />Anderson asked the standard setback for an office development. The City <br />Planner noted that the minimwn setback from the right-of--way in the B-3 <br />District is 30 feet. However, this property is zoned PUD. Fahey noted that the <br />decreased setback results in more intense development on the site- The <br />Planner also noted that while the building setback in the B-3 District is 30 feet, <br />parking can be 5 feet from the property line. As part of this development <br />review, parking areas were originally oriented toward the street. The City <br />asked that fhe buildings be oriented toward the street making the buildings <br />more of an emphasis along the street. <br />2 <br />